The roles of phytochromes in elongation and gravitropism of roots

Gravitropic orientation and the elongation of etiolated hypocotyls are both regulated by red light through the phytochrome family of photoreceptors. The importance of phytochromes A and B (phyA and phyB) in these red light responses has been established through studies using phy mutants. To identify the roles that phytochromes play in gravitropism and elongation of roots, we studied the effects of red light on root elongation and then compared the gravitropic curvature from roots of phytochrome mutants of Arabidopsis (phyA, phyB, phyD and phyAB) with wild type. We found that red light inhibits root elongation approximately 35% in etiolated seedlings and that this response is controlled by phytochromes. Roots from dark- and light-grown double mutants (phyAB) and light-grown phyB seedlings have reduced elongation rates compared with wild type. In addition, roots from these seedlings (dark/light-grown phyAB and light-grown phyB) have reduced rates of gravitropic curvature compared with wild type. These results demonstrate roles for phytochromes in regulating both the elongation and gravitropic curvature of roots.     

Molecular and phenotypic specificity of an antisense PHYB gene in Arabidopsis

The family of phytochrome photoreceptors plays an essential role in regulating plant growth and development in response to the light environment. An antisense PHYB transgene has been introduced into wild-type Arabidopsis and shown to inhibit expression of the PHYB sense mRNA and the phyB phytochrome protein 4- to 5-fold. This inhibition is specific to phyB in that the levels of the four other phytochromes, notably the closely related phyD and phyE phytochromes, are unaffected in the antisense lines. Antisense-induced reduction in phyB causes alterations of red light effects on seedling hypocotyl elongation, rosette leaf morphology, and chlorophyll content, similar to the phenotypic changes caused by phyB null mutations. However, unlike the phyB mutants, the antisense lines do not flower early compared to the wild type. Furthermore, unlike the phyB mutants, the antisense lines do not show a reduction in phyC level compared to the wild type, making it possible to unequivocally associate several of the photomorphogenic effects seen in phyB mutants with phytochrome B alone. These results indicate that an antisense transgene approach can be used to specifically inhibit the expression and activity of a single member of the phytochrome family and to alter aspects of shade avoidance responses in a targeted manner.     

Interactions of phytochromes A,B1 and B2 in light-induced competence for adventitious shoot formation in hypocotyl of tomato (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Solanum lycopersicum</Emphasis> L.)

The interactions of phytochrome A (phyA), phytochrome B1 (phyB1) and phytochrome B2 (phyB2) in light-dependent shoot regeneration from the hypocotyl of tomato was analysed using all eight possible homozygous allelic combinations of the null mutants. The donor plants were pre-grown either in the dark or under red or far-red light for 8 days after sowing; thereafter hypocotyl segments (apical, middle and basal portions) were transferred onto hormone-free medium for culture under different light qualities. Etiolated apical segments cultured in vitro under white light showed a very high frequency of regeneration for all of the genotypes tested besides phyB1phyB2, phyAphyB1 and phyAphyB1phyB2 mutants. Evidence is provided of a specific interference of phyB2 with phyA-mediated HIR to far-red and blue light in etiolated explants. Pre-treatment of donor plants by growth under red light enhanced the competence of phyB1phyB2, phyAphyB1 and phyAphyB1phyB2 mutants for shoot regeneration, whereas pre-irradiation with far-red light enhanced the frequency of regeneration only in the phyAphyB1 mutant. Multiple phytochromes are involved in red light- and far-red light-dependent acquisition of competence for shoot regeneration. The position of the segments along the hypocotyl influenced the role of the various phytochromes and the interactions between them. The culture of competent hypocotyl segments under red, far-red or blue light reduced the frequency of explants forming shoots compared to those cultured under white light, with different genotypes having different response patterns.Abbreviations HIR: High irradiance response - LFR: Low fluence response - Pfr: Far-red absorbing form of phytochrome - phyA: Phytochrome A - phyB1: Phytochrome B1 - phyB2: Phytochrome B2 - phyA(B1, B2): Phytochrome mutant deficient in phyA (B1, B2) - phyAphyB1(B1B2,AB2): Double phytochrome mutant deficient in phyA and phyB1(B1, B2) - phyAphyB1phyB2: Triple mutant deficient in phyA, phyB1 and phyB2 - VLFR: Very low fluence response - WT: Wild-type tomato Communicated by R. Reski     

Effect of prolonged root hypoxia on the antioxidant content of tomato fruit

Tomato fruit quality depends on its metabolite content, which in turn is determined by numerous metabolic changes occurring during fruit development and ripening. The aim of this work was to investigate whether flooding affects the nutritional quality of tomato fruit, focusing on compounds essential to human health: carotenoids and ascorbate. To this end, tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv Micro-Tom) were submitted to prolonged root hypoxia (1–2% O₂) at first flower anthesis. Fruits were harvested at five stages of the ripening process and analysed for their carotenoid and ascorbate contents. Our results showed that the ripening of fruits that developed on hypoxia treated plants was not inhibited. However, root hypoxia significantly limits carotenoid and ascorbate accumulation in pericarp during fruit ripening, the strongest effects being observed at late stages of ripening. Limitation of both carotenoids and ascorbate accumulation seems to be primarily mediated by the reduced level of expression of genes of the corresponding metabolic pathway.     

Tissue‐specific and light‐dependent regulation of phytochrome gene expression in rice

Phytochromes are red‐ and far red light photoreceptors in higher plants. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) has three phytochromes (phyA, phyB and phyC), which play distinct as well as cooperative roles in light perception. To gain a better understanding of individual phytochrome functions in rice, expression patterns of three phytochrome genes were characterized using promoter‐GUS fusion constructs. The phytochrome genes PHYA and PHYB showed distinct patterns of tissue‐ and developmental stage‐specific expression in rice. The PHYA promoter‐GUS was expressed in all leaf tissues in etiolated seedlings, while its expression was restricted to vascular bundles in expanded leaves of light‐grown seedlings. These observations suggest that light represses the expression of the PHYA gene in all cells except vascular bundle cells in rice seedlings. Red light was effective, but far red light was ineffective in gene repression, and red light‐induced repression was not observed in phyB mutants. These results indicate that phyB is involved in light‐dependent and tissue‐specific repression of the PHYA gene in rice.     

A novel tomato F‐box protein,SlEBF3, is involved in tuning ethylene signaling during plant development and climacteric fruit ripening

Ethylene is instrumental to climacteric fruit ripening and EIN3 BINDING F‐BOX (EBF) proteins have been assigned a central role in mediating ethylene responses by regulating EIN3/EIL degradation in Arabidopsis. However, the role and mode of action of tomato EBFs in ethylene‐dependent processes like fruit ripening remains unclear. Two novel EBF genes, SlEBF3 and SlEBF4, were identified in the tomato genome, and SlEBF3 displayed a ripening‐associated expression pattern suggesting its potential involvement in controlling ethylene response during fruit ripening. SlEBF3 downregulated tomato lines failed to show obvious ripening‐related phenotypes likely due to functional redundancy among SlEBF family members. By contrast, SlEBF3 overexpression lines exhibited pleiotropic ethylene‐related alterations, including inhibition of fruit ripening, attenuated triple‐response and delayed petal abscission. Yeast‐two‐hybrid system and bimolecular fluorescence complementation approaches indicated that SlEBF3 interacts with all known tomato SlEIL proteins and, consistently, total SlEIL protein levels were decreased in SlEBF3 overexpression fruits, supporting the idea that the reduced ethylene sensitivity and defects in fruit ripening are due to the SlEBF3‐mediated degradation of EIL proteins. Moreover, SlEBF3 expression is regulated by EIL1 via a feedback loop, which supposes its role in tuning ethylene signaling and responses. Overall, the study reveals the role of a novel EBF tomato gene in climacteric ripening, thus providing a new target for modulating fleshy fruit ripening.     

Tomato contains two differentially expressed genes encoding B-type phytochromes,neither of which can be considered an ortholog of Arabidopsis phytochrome B

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) contains two B-type phytochrome genes (PHYB1 and PHYB2). Fragments of these two PHYB were cloned following amplification by the polymerase chain reaction of a portion of their relatively well conserved 5 coding regions. Polypeptides encoded by these gene fragments exhibit 90% sequence identity. These two PHYB are independently expressed in organ-specific fashion. In mature plants, PHYB2 mRNA is most abundant in fruit and PHYB1 mRNA in expanded leaves. A phylogenetic analysis fails to establish which tomato PHYB is orthologous to either Arabidopsis PHYB or PHYD, the latter being a second B-type phytochrome. Instead, this analysis indicates that following the divergence of the Solanaceae and Brassicaceae from one another, a PHYB gene duplicated independently in each lineage. Consequently, Arabidopsis PHYB mutants cannot be considered strictly equivalent to the tomato tri mutants, which appear to be mutated at the PHYB1 locus. Similarly, other putative PHYB mutants might not be equivalent to those described for Arabidopsis and tomato. This situation complicates efforts to determine PHYB function because there might be no one answer to this question.Abbreviations PCR polymerase chain reaction - PHY undesignated phytochrome gene - PHYA, PHYB, etc phytochrome gene(s) of the A, B, etc. type This research was supported by USDA NRICGP grant 93-00939 and by NATO travel grant CRG 931183. It was initiated when two of us (L.H.P., M.-M.C.-P.) spent a sabbatical year at the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique in Versailles, France. L.H.P. gratefully acknowledges support provided by a senior guest fellowship from the Ministère de l'enseignement superieur et de la recherche during his stay in Versailles. L.H.P. and M.-M.C.-P thank all of their colleagues in Versailles for their warm hospitality and their willingness to share their expertise with us. We also thank Russell Malmberg, Richard Meagher and Robert Price for helpful discussions concerning the interpretation of molecular phylogenies.     

Photomorphogenic mutants of tomato

Photomorphogenesis of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is being studied with the aid of mutants which are modified either in their photoreceptor composition or in their signal transduction chain(s). Phytochrome chromophore mutants, presumably deficient in all phytochromes, and mutants specifically deficient in phytochrome A (phy A) or B1 (phyB1) have been used to study the roles played by phytochromes in photomorphogenesis. In addition, other mutants, including transgenic lines overproducing phyA, exhibit exaggerated photomorphogenesis. Studies using these mutants are reviewed, with emphasis being placed on anthocyanin biosynthesis and plastid development as model systems for the dissection of the complex interactions between photoreceptors and to elucidate the nature of photoreceptor transduction chains. Recently, new mutants have been isolated by screening in a phyA, phyB1-deficient background. The novel phenotypes selected are candidates for mutants in additional photoreceptors or their transduction chains.     

Induced point mutations in the phytoene synthase 1 gene cause differences in carotenoid content during tomato fruit ripening

In tomato, carotenoids are important with regard to major breeding traits such as fruit colour and human health. The enzyme phytoene synthase (PSY1) directs metabolic flux towards carotenoid synthesis. Through TILLING (Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes), we have identified two point mutations in the Psy1 gene. The first mutation is a knockout allele (W180*) and the second mutation leads to an amino acid substitution (P192L). Plants carrying the Psy1 knockout allele show fruit with a yellow flesh colour similar to the r, r mutant, with no further change in colour during ripening. In the line with P192L substitution, fruit remain yellow until 3 days post-breaker and eventually turn red. Metabolite profiling verified the absence of carotenoids in the W180* line and thereby confirms that PSY1 is the only enzyme introducing substrate into the carotenoid pathway in ripening fruit. More subtle effects on carotenoid accumulation were observed in the P192L line with a delay in lycopene and β-carotene accumulation clearly linked to a very slow synthesis of phytoene. The observation of lutein degradation with ripening in both lines showed that lutein and its precursors are still synthesised in ripening fruit. Gene expression analysis of key genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis revealed that expression levels of genes in the pathway are not feedback-regulated by low levels or absence of carotenoid compounds. Furthermore, protein secondary structure modelling indicated that the P192L mutation affects PSY1 activity through misfolding, leading to the low phytoene accumulation.     

Fruit-localized phytochromes regulate lycopene accumulation independently of ethylene production in tomato

We show that phytochromes modulate differentially various facets of light-induced ripening of tomato fruit (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Northern analysis demonstrated that phytochrome A mRNA in fruit accumulates 11.4-fold during ripening. Spectroradiometric measurement of pericarp tissues revealed that the red to far-red ratio increases 4-fold in pericarp tissues during ripening from the immature-green to the red-ripe stage. Brief red-light treatment of harvested mature-green fruit stimulated lycopene accumulation 2. 3-fold during fruit development. This red-light-induced lycopene accumulation was reversed by subsequent treatment with far-red light, establishing that light-induced accumulation of lycopene in tomato is regulated by fruit-localized phytochromes. Red-light and red-light/far-red-light treatments during ripening did not influence ethylene production, indicating that the biosynthesis of this ripening hormone in these tissues is not regulated by fruit-localized phytochromes. Compression analysis of fruit treated with red light or red/far-red light indicated that phytochromes do not regulate the rate or extent of pericarp softening during ripening. Moreover, treatments with red or red/far-red light did not alter the concentrations of citrate, malate, fructose, glucose, or sucrose in fruit. These results are consistent with two conclusions: (a) fruit-localized phytochromes regulate light-induced lycopene accumulation independently of ethylene biosynthesis; and (b) fruit-localized phytochromes are not global regulators of ripening, but instead regulate one or more specific components of this developmental process.