Conformation of myosin interdomain interactions during contraction: deductions from muscle fibers using polarized fluorescence

Myosin cross-bridge subfragment 1 (S1) is the ATP catalyzing motor protein in muscle. It consists of three domains that catalyze ATP and bind actin (catalytic), conduct energy transduction (converter), and transport the load (lever arm). Force development during contraction is thought to result from rotary lever arm movement with the cross-bridge attached to actin. To elucidate cross-bridge structure during force development, two crystal structures of S1 were extrapolated to working "in solution" or oriented "in tissue" forms, using structure-sensitive optical spectroscopic signals from two extrinsic probes. The probes were located at two interfaces containing the catalytic, converter, and lever arm domains of S1. Observed signals included circular dichroism (CD) and absorption originating from S1 in solution in the presence and absence of actin and fluorescence polarization from cross-bridges in muscle fibers. Theoretical signals were calculated from S1 crystal structure models perturbed with lever arm movement from swiveling at three conserved glycines, 699, 703, and 710 (chicken skeletal myosin numbering). Best agreement between the computed and observed signals gave structures showing that actin binding to S1 causes movement of the lever arm. A three-state model of S1 conformation during contraction consists of three actin-bound cross-bridge states observed from muscle fibers in isometric contraction, in the presence of MgADP, and in rigor. Structures best representing these states show that most of the lever arm rotation occurs between isometric contraction and the MgADP states, i.e., during phosphate release. Smaller but significant lever arm rotation occurs with ADP dissociation. Structural changes within the S1 interfaces studied are discussed in the accompanying paper [Burghardt et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4834-4843].     

Ultra-fastChara myosin: A test case for the swinging lever arm model for force production by myosin

Recent breakthroughs and technological improvements are rapidly generating evidence supporting the “swinging lever arm model” for force production by myosin. Unlike previous models, this model posits that the globular domain of the myosin motor binds to actin with a constant orientation during force generation. Movement of the neck domain of the motor is hypothesized to occur relative to the globular domain much like a lever arm. This intramolecular conformational change drives the movement of the bound actin. The swinging lever arm model is supported by or consistent with a large number of experimental data obtained with skeletal muscle or slime mold myosins, all of which move actin filaments at rates between 1 and 10 μm/sin vitro. Recently myosin was purified, fromChara internodal cells.In vitro the purifiedChara myosin moves actin filaments at rates one order of magnitude faster than the “fast” skeletal muscle myosin. While this ultra fast movement is not necessarily inconsistent with the swinging lever arm model, one or more specific facets of the motor must be altered in theChara motor in order to accommodate such rapid movement. These characteristics are experimentally testable, thus the ultra fast movement byChara myosin represents a powerful and compelling test of the swinging lever arm model.     

Electron Tomography of Cryofixed,Isometrically Contracting Insect Flight Muscle Reveals Novel Actin-Myosin Interactions

Background

Isometric muscle contraction, where force is generated without muscle shortening, is a molecular traffic jam in which the number of actin-attached motors is maximized and all states of motor action are trapped with consequently high heterogeneity. This heterogeneity is a major limitation to deciphering myosin conformational changes in situ.

Methodology

We used multivariate data analysis to group repeat segments in electron tomograms of isometrically contracting insect flight muscle, mechanically monitored, rapidly frozen, freeze substituted, and thin sectioned. Improved resolution reveals the helical arrangement of F-actin subunits in the thin filament enabling an atomic model to be built into the thin filament density independent of the myosin. Actin-myosin attachments can now be assigned as weak or strong by their motor domain orientation relative to actin. Myosin attachments were quantified everywhere along the thin filament including troponin. Strong binding myosin attachments are found on only four F-actin subunits, the “target zone”, situated exactly midway between successive troponin complexes. They show an axial lever arm range of 77°/12.9 nm. The lever arm azimuthal range of strong binding attachments has a highly skewed, 127° range compared with X-ray crystallographic structures. Two types of weak actin attachments are described. One type, found exclusively in the target zone, appears to represent pre-working-stroke intermediates. The other, which contacts tropomyosin rather than actin, is positioned M-ward of the target zone, i.e. the position toward which thin filaments slide during shortening.

Conclusion

We present a model for the weak to strong transition in the myosin ATPase cycle that incorporates azimuthal movements of the motor domain on actin. Stress/strain in the S2 domain may explain azimuthal lever arm changes in the strong binding attachments. The results support previous conclusions that the weak attachments preceding force generation are very different from strong binding attachments.     

The Lever Arm Effects a Mechanical Asymmetry of the Myosin-V-Actin Bond

Myosin-V is a two-headed molecular motor taking multiple ATP-dependent steps toward the plus end (forward) of actin filaments. At high mechanical loads, the motor processively steps toward the minus end (backward) even in the absence of ATP, whereas analogous forward steps cannot be induced. The detailed mechanism underlying this mechanical asymmetry is not known. We investigate the effect of force on individual single headed myosin-V constructs bound to actin in the absence of ATP. If pulled forward, the myosin-V head dissociates at forces twice as high than if pulled backward. Moreover, backward but not forward distances to the unbinding barrier are dependent on the lever arm length. This asymmetry of unbinding force distributions in a single headed myosin forms the basis of the two-headed asymmetry. Under load, the lever arm functions as a true lever in a mechanical sense.     

Myosin motor domain lever arm rotation is coupled to ATP hydrolysis

We have investigated coupling of lever arm rotation to the ATP binding and hydrolysis steps for the myosin motor domain. In several current hypotheses of the mechanism of force production by muscle, the primary mechanical feature is the rotation of a lever arm that is a subdomain of the myosin motor domain. In these models, the lever arm rotates while the myosin motor domain is free, and then reverses the rotation to produce force while it is bound to actin. These mechanical steps are coupled to steps in the ATP hydrolysis cycle. Our hypothesis is that ATP hydrolysis induces lever arm rotation to produce a more compact motor domain that has stored mechanical energy. Our approach is to use transient electric birefringence techniques to measure changes in hydrodynamic size that result from lever arm rotation when various ligands are bound to isolated skeletal muscle myosin motor domain in solution. Results for ATP and CTP, which do support force production by muscle fibers, are compared to those of ATPgammaS and GTP, which do not. Measurements are also made of conformational changes when the motor domain is bound to NDP's and PP(i) in the absence and presence of the phosphate analogue orthovanadate, to determine the roles the nucleoside moieties of the nucleotides have on lever arm rotation. The results indicate that for the substrates investigated, rotation does not occur upon substrate binding, but is coupled to the NTP hydrolysis step. The data are consistent with a model in which only substrates that produce a motor domain-NDP-P(i) complex as the steady-state intermediate make the motor domain more compact, and only those substrates support force production.     

The structural basis of muscle contraction

The myosin cross-bridge exists in two conformations, which differ in the orientation of a long lever arm. Since the lever arm undergoes a 60 degree rotation between the two conformations, which would lead to a displacement of the myosin filament of about 11 nm, the transition between these two states has been associated with the elementary 'power stroke' of muscle. Moreover, this rotation is coupled with changes in the active site (CLOSED to OPEN), which probably enable phosphate release. The transition CLOSED to OPEN appears to be brought about by actin binding. However, kinetics shows that the binding of myosin to actin is a two-step process which affects both ATP and ADP affinity and vice versa. The structural basis of these effects is only partially explained by the presently known conformers of myosin. Therefore, additional states of the myosin cross-bridge should exist. Indeed, cryoelectron microscopy has revealed other angles of the lever arm induced by ADP binding to a smooth muscle actin-myosin complex.     

The structural basis of myosin V processive movement as revealed by electron cryomicroscopy

The processive motor myosin V has a relatively high affinity for actin in the presence of ATP and, thus, offers the unique opportunity to visualize some of the weaker, hitherto inaccessible, actin bound states of the ATPase cycle. Here, electron cryomicroscopy together with computer-based docking of crystal structures into three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions provide the atomic models of myosin V in both weak and strong actin bound states. One structure shows that ATP binding opens the long cleft dividing the actin binding region of the motor domain, thus destroying the strong binding actomyosin interface while rearranging loop 2 as a tether. Nucleotide analogs showed a second new state in which the lever arm points upward, in a prepower-stroke configuration (lever arm up) bound to actin before phosphate release. Our findings reveal how the structural elements of myosin V work together to allow myosin V to step along actin for multiple ATPase cycles without dissociating.     

Detection of the swings of the lever arm of a myosin motor by fluorescence resonance energy transfer of green and blue fluorescent proteins

The "lever-arm" model of a myosin motor predicts that the lever-arm domain in the myosin head tilts and swings against the catalytic domain during ATP hydrolysis, resulting in force generation. To investigate if this "swing" of the lever arm really occurs during the hydrolysis of ATP, we employed fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between two fluorescent proteins [green (GFP) and blue (BFP)] fused to the N and C termini of the Dictyostelium myosin-motor domain. FRET measurements showed that the C-terminal BFP in the fusion protein first swings against the N-terminal GFP at the isomerization step of the ATP hydrolysis cycle and then swings back at the phosphate-release step. Because the C-terminal BFP mimics the motion of the lever arm, the result indicates that the lever arm swings at the specific steps of the ATP hydrolysis cycle, i.e., at the isomerization and phosphate-release steps. The latter swing may correspond to the power stroke of myosin, while the former may be related to the recovery stroke.     

The myosin relay helix to converter interface remains intact throughout the actomyosin ATPase cycle

Crystal structures of the myosin motor domain in the presence of different nucleotides show the lever arm domain in two basic angular states, postulated to represent prestroke and poststroke states, respectively (Rayment, I. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15850-15853; Dominguez, R., Freyzon, Y., Trybus, K. M., and Cohen, C. (1998) Cell 94, 559-571). Contact is maintained between two domains, the relay and the converter, in both of these angular states. Therefore it has been proposed by Dominguez et al. (cited above) that this contact is critical for mechanically driving the angular change of the lever arm domain. However, structural information is lacking on whether this contact is maintained throughout the actin-activated myosin ATPase cycle. To test the functional importance of this interdomain contact, we introduced cysteines into the sequence of a "cysteine-light" myosin motor at position 499 on the lower cleft and position 738 on the converter domain (Shih, W. M., Gryczynski, Z., Lakowicz, J. L., and Spudich, J. A. (2000) Cell 102, 683-694). Disulfide cross-linking could be induced. The cross-link had minimal effects on actin binding, ATP-induced actin release, and actin-activated ATPase. These results demonstrate that the relay/converter interface remains intact in the actin strongly bound state of myosin and throughout the entire actin-activated myosin ATPase cycle.     

Transient kinetics and mechanics of myosin's force-generating rotation in muscle: resolution of millisecond rotational transitions in the spin-labeled myosin light-chain domain

We have used electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) of spin-labeled scallop muscle, in conjunction with laser flash photolysis of caged ATP, to resolve millisecond rotational transitions of the myosin light-chain domain (LCD) during transient force generation. We previously used EPR to resolve two distinct orientations of the LCD [Baker, J. E., Brust-Mascher, I., Ramachandran, S., LaConte, L. E., and Thomas, D. D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 2944-2949], correlated these structural states with biochemical states in the actin-myosin ATPase reaction, and showed that a small shift in the steady-state distribution between these two LCD orientations (i.e., a net lever arm rotation) is associated with force generation in muscle. In the study presented here, we measured millisecond changes in this orientational distribution (i.e., the rates of transition between the two LCD orientations) in muscle following flash photolysis of caged ATP, in both the presence and absence of Ca. The transient acquired in the absence of Ca is dominated by a rapid (1/tau(1) = 37 s(-1)) disordering transition from the single orientation in rigor to the bimodal orientation distribution observed for detached cross-bridges in relaxation (i.e., the reversal of the lever arm rotation), followed by a recovery phase (1/tau(2) = 2.4 s(-1)) of very small amplitude (small fraction of heads participating). In the presence of Ca, the transient exhibited a similar initial disordering phase (1/tau(1) = 38.5 s(-1)), followed by a recovery phase (1/tau(2) = 8.33 s(-1)) of substantial amplitude, corresponding to the forward rotation and ordering of the lever arm. A standard kinetic model was used to fit these data, revealing rate constants consistent with those previously determined by other methods. Surprisingly, a comparison of the EPR transients with force transients reveals that the rate of force development (91 s(-1)) is faster than the rate of the forward lever arm rotation (8 s(-1)). This observed relationship between the kinetics of the lever arm rotation and transient force development in muscle provides new insight into how myosin both generates and responds to muscle force.     

A mathematical model of mechanical responses of contracting muscle fibers to temperature jumps

A structural and kinetic model of actomyosin interaction in a contracting muscle fiber has been proposed, based on the assumption that the myosin molecular motor generates force in two steps. Initially, a nonstereospecifically attached myosin head rolls on the actin surface and stereospecifically locks on actin. Then its α-helical lever arm (neck domain) tilts about its catalytic domain. The model also includes the modern scheme of ATP hydrolysis by actomyosin. The results of modeling presented here quantitatively reproduce all experimentally observed characteristics of the responses of tension and stiffness of muscle fibers to T-jumps of different amplitudes.     

Probing Muscle Myosin Motor Action: X-Ray (M3 and M6) Interference Measurements Report Motor Domain Not Lever Arm Movement

The key question in understanding how force and movement are produced in muscle concerns the nature of the cyclic interaction of myosin molecules with actin filaments. The lever arm of the globular head of each myosin molecule is thought in some way to swing axially on the actin-attached motor domain, thus propelling the actin filament past the myosin filament. Recent X-ray diffraction studies of vertebrate muscle, especially those involving the analysis of interference effects between myosin head arrays in the two halves of the thick filaments, have been claimed to prove that the lever arm moves at the same time as the sliding of actin and myosin filaments in response to muscle length or force steps. It was suggested that the sliding of myosin and actin filaments, the level of force produced and the lever arm angle are all directly coupled and that other models of lever arm movement will not fit the X-ray data. Here, we show that, in addition to interference across the A-band, which must be occurring, the observed meridional M3 and M6 X-ray intensity changes can all be explained very well by the changing diffraction effects during filament sliding caused by heads stereospecifically attached to actin moving axially relative to a population of detached or non-stereospecifically attached heads that remain fixed in position relative to the myosin filament backbone. Crucially, and contrary to previous interpretations, the X-ray interference results provide little direct information about the position of the myosin head lever arm; they are, in fact, reporting relative motor domain movements. The implications of the new interpretation are briefly assessed.     

Mutation of a conserved glycine in the SH1-SH2 helix affects the load-dependent kinetics of myosin

The ATP hydrolysis rate and shortening velocity of muscle are load-dependent. At the molecular level, myosin generates force and motion by coupling ATP hydrolysis to lever arm rotation. When a laser trap was used to apply load to single heads of expressed smooth muscle myosin (S1), the ADP release kinetics accelerated with an assistive load and slowed with a resistive load; however, ATP binding was mostly unaffected. To investigate how load is communicated within the motor, a glycine located at the putative fulcrum of the lever arm was mutated to valine (G709V). In the absence of load, stopped-flow and laser trap studies showed that the mutation significantly slowed the rates of ADP release and ATP binding, accounting for the ~270-fold decrease in actin sliding velocity. The load dependence of the mutant's ADP release rate was the same as that of wild-type S1 (WT) despite the slower rate. In contrast, load accelerated ATP binding by ~20-fold, irrespective of loading direction. Imparting mechanical energy to the mutant motor partially reversed the slowed ATP binding by overcoming the elevated activation energy barrier. These results imply that conformational changes near the conserved G709 are critical for the transmission of mechanochemical information between myosin's active site and lever arm.     

Characterization of three regulatory states of the striated muscle thin filament

The troponin-tropomyosin-linked regulation of striated muscle contraction occurs through allosteric control by both Ca(2+) and myosin. The thin filament fluctuates between two extreme states: the inactive "off" state and the active "on" state. Intermediate states have been proposed from structural studies and transient kinetic measurements. However, in contrast to the well-characterised, on and off states, the mechanochemical properties of the intermediate states are much less well understood because of the instability of those states. In the present study, we have characterized a myosin-induced intermediate that is stabilized by cross-linking myosin motor domains (S1) to actin filaments (with a maximum of one S1 molecule for 50 actin monomers). A single S1 molecule is known to interact with two adjacent actin monomers. A detailed analysis revealed that thin filaments containing S1 molecules cross-linked to just one actin monomer (actin(1)-S1 complexes) are regulated with a 79% inhibition of the ATPase in the absence of Ca(2+). In contrast, filaments containing S1 molecules cross-linked at two positions, to two adjacent actin monomers (actin(2)-S1 complexes) totally lose their regulation in a highly cooperative manner. This loss of regulation was due both to an enhancement of the ATPase activity without calcium and an inhibition of the ATPase with calcium. Filaments containing actin(2)-S1 complexes, with significant ATPase activity in the absence of calcium (about 50%), did not move on a myosin-coated surface unless calcium was present. This partial uncoupling between the ATPase activity and in vitro motility in the absence of calcium demonstrates that the mechanical steps require actin-myosin contacts, which take place only in the on state and not in the off or intermediate states. These data provide new insights concerning the difference in cooperativity of Ca(2+) regulation that exists between the biochemical and mechanical cycles of the actin-myosin motor.     

Force generation by recombinant myosin heads trapped between two functionalized surfaces

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements have revealed that the lever-arm domain of myosin swings when it hydrolyzes Mg-ATP. It is generally accepted that this swing of the lever arm of myosin is the molecular basis of force generation. On the other hand, the possibility that the force might be generated at the interface between actin and myosin cannot be ignored. However, there is a third possibility, namely, that myosin itself generates force without actin. Thus, using recombinant subfragment 1 molecules of Dictyostelium myosin II that were trapped between two functionalized surfaces of a surface-force apparatus, we determined whether myosin itself could actually generate force. Here, we report that, despite the absence of actin, myosin heads themselves have a capacity to generate a force (at least ~0.2 pN/molecule) that is coupled to the structural changes. Although the role of actin should not be neglected because muscle physiologically shortens as a result of the interaction between actin and myosin, in this work the focus is on the question of whether the catalytic domain of myosin has the capacity to generate force.     

How myosin motors power cellular functions: an exciting journey from structure to function: based on a lecture delivered at the 34th FEBS Congress in Prague, Czech Republic, July 2009

Molecular motors such as myosins are allosteric enzymes that power essential motility functions in the cell. Structural biology is an important tool for deciphering how these motors work. Myosins produce force upon the actin-driven conformational changes controlling the sequential release of the hydrolysis products of ATP (Pi followed by ADP). These conformational changes are amplified by a 'lever arm', which includes the region of the motor known as the converter and the adjacent elongated light chain binding region. Analysis of four structural states of the motor provides a detailed understanding of the rearrangements and pathways of communication in the motor that are necessary for detachment from the actin track and repriming of the motor. However, the important part of the cycle in which force is produced remains enigmatic and awaits new high-resolution structures. The value of a structural approach is particularly evident from clues provided by the structural states of the reverse myosin VI motor. Crystallographic structures have revealed that rearrangements within the converter subdomain occur, which explains why this myosin can produce a large stroke in the opposite direction to all other myosins, despite a very short lever arm. By providing a detailed understanding of the motor rearrangements, structural biology will continue to reveal essential information and help solve current enigma, such as how actin promotes force production, how motors are tuned for specific cellular roles or how motor/cargo interactions regulate the function of myosin in the cell.     

The "roll and lock" mechanism of force generation in muscle

Muscle force results from the interaction of the globular heads of myosin-II with actin filaments. We studied the structure-function relationship in the myosin motor in contracting muscle fibers by using temperature jumps or length steps combined with time-resolved, low-angle X-ray diffraction. Both perturbations induced simultaneous changes in the active muscle force and in the extent of labeling of the actin helix by stereo-specifically bound myosin heads at a constant total number of attached heads. The generally accepted hypothesis assumes that muscle force is generated solely by tilting of the lever arm, or the light chain domain of the myosin head, about its catalytic domain firmly bound to actin. Data obtained suggest an additional force-generating step: the "roll and lock" transition of catalytic domains of non-stereo-specifically attached heads to a stereo-specifically bound state. A model based on this scheme is described to quantitatively explain the data.     

Myosin S2 Origins Track Evolution of Strong Binding on Actin by Azimuthal Rolling of Motor Domain

Myosin crystal structures have given rise to the swinging lever arm hypothesis, which predicts a large axial tilt of the lever arm domain during the actin-attached working stroke. Previous work imaging the working stroke in actively contracting, fast-frozen Lethocerus muscle confirmed the axial tilt; but strongly bound myosin heads also showed an unexpected azimuthal slew of the lever arm around the thin filament axis, which was not predicted from known crystal structures. We hypothesized that an azimuthal reorientation of the myosin motor domain on actin during the weak-binding to strong-binding transition could explain the lever arm slew provided that myosin’s α-helical coiled-coil subfragment 2 (S2) domain emerged from the thick filament backbone at a particular location. However, previous studies did not adequately resolve the S2 domain. Here we used electron tomography of rigor muscle swollen by low ionic strength to pull S2 clear of the thick filament backbone, thereby revealing the azimuth of its point of origin. The results show that the azimuth of S2 origins of those rigor myosin heads, bound to the actin target zone of actively contracting muscle, originate from a restricted region of the thick filament. This requires an azimuthal reorientation of the motor domain on actin during the weak to strong transition.     

Elastic lever-arm model for myosin V

We present a mechanochemical model for myosin V, a two-headed processive motor protein. We derive the properties of a dimer from those of an individual head, which we model both with a four-state cycle (detached; attached with ADP.Pi; attached with ADP; and attached without nucleotide) and alternatively with a five-state cycle (where the powerstroke is not tightly coupled to the phosphate release). In each state the lever arm leaves the head at a different, but fixed, angle. The lever arm itself is described as an elastic rod. The chemical cycles of both heads are coordinated exclusively by the mechanical connection between the two lever arms. The model explains head coordination by showing that the lead head only binds to actin after the powerstroke in the trail head and that it only undergoes its powerstroke after the trail head unbinds from actin. Both models (four- and five-state) reproduce the observed hand-over-hand motion and fit the measured force-velocity relations. The main difference between the two models concerns the load dependence of the run length, which is much weaker in the five-state model. We show how systematic processivity measurement under varying conditions could be used to distinguish between both models and to determine the kinetic parameters.     

Secretory vesicle transport velocity in living cells depends on the myosin-V lever arm length

Myosins are molecular motors that exert force against actin filaments. One widely conserved myosin class, the myosin-Vs, recruits organelles to polarized sites in animal and fungal cells. However, it has been unclear whether myosin-Vs actively transport organelles, and whether the recently challenged lever arm model developed for muscle myosin applies to myosin-Vs. Here we demonstrate in living, intact yeast that secretory vesicles move rapidly toward their site of exocytosis. The maximal speed varies linearly over a wide range of lever arm lengths genetically engineered into the myosin-V heavy chain encoded by the MYO2 gene. Thus, secretory vesicle polarization is achieved through active transport by a myosin-V, and the motor mechanism is consistent with the lever arm model.