Use of retinoic acid for the analysis of dermal-epidermal interactions in the tarsometatarsal skin of the chick embryo

Feet of chicks are normally covered with scales. Injection of retinoic acid into the amniotic cavity of 10-day chick embryos causes the formation of feathers on the foot scales. To elucidate whether retinoic acid affects primarily the epidermis or the dermis, heterotypic dermal-epidermal recombinants of tarsometatarsal skin were tested as to their morphogenetic capacity, when grafted to the chick chorioallantoic membrane. Recombinants involving treated epidermis and untreated dermis formed feathered scales, while the reverse recombinants of untreated epidermis and treated dermis led to the formation of scales only. Likewise the association of treated tarsometatarsal dermis with untreated epidermis from a non-appendage-forming region (the midventral apterium) resulted in the formation of scales only. These results show that retinoic acid affects primarily the epidermis. Further insight into the mechanism of dermal-epidermal interaction was gained by heterotopic recombinations of early (8.5- and 10-day) untreated tarsometatarsal dermis with epidermis from the midventral apterium. These recombinants formed scales, proving that tarsometatarsal dermis is endowed with scale-forming properties as early as 8.5 days of incubation. Finally, it is concluded that retinoic acid acts on the chick foot epidermal cells by temporarily inhibiting their scale placode-forming properties, allowing their latent feather placode-forming properties to be expressed.     

Differentiation of embryonic chick feather-forming and scale-forming tissues in transfilter cultures

The dermal-epidermal tissue interaction in the chick embryo, leading to the formation of feathers and scales, provides a good experimental system to study the transfer between tissues of signals which specify cell type. At certain times in development, the dermis controls whether the epidermis forms feathers or scales, each of which are characterized by the synthesis of specific beta-keratins. In our culture system, a dermal effect on epidermal differentiation can still be observed, even when the tissues are separated by a Nuclepore filter, although development is abnormal. Epidermal morphological and histological differentiation in transfilter cultures are distinct and recognizable, more closely resembling feather or scale development, depending on the regional origin of the dermis. Differentiation is more advanced when epidermis is cultured transfilter from scale dermis than from feather dermis, as assessed by morphology and histology, as well as the expression of the tissue-specific gene products, the beta-keratins. Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel analysis of the beta-keratins reveals that scale dermis cultured transfilter from either presumptive scale or feather epidermis induces the production of 7 of the 9 scale-specific beta-keratins that we have identified. Feather dermis, although less effective in activating the feather gene program when cultured transfilter from either presumptive feather or scale epidermis, is able to turn on the synthesis of 3 to 6 of the 18 feather-specific beta-keratins that we have identified. However, scale epidermis in transfilter recombinants with feather dermis also continues to synthesize many of the scale-specific beta-keratins. Using transmission and scanning electron microscopy, we detect no cell contact between tissues separated by a 0.2-micron pore diameter Nuclepore filter, while 0.4-micron filters readily permit cell processes to traverse the filter. We find that epidermal differentiation is the same with either pore size filter. Furthermore, we do not detect a basement membrane in transfilter cultures, implying that neither direct cell contact between dermis and epidermis, nor a basement membrane between the tissues is required for the extent of epidermal differentiation that we observe.     

Analysis of corneal development with monoclonal antibodies. II. Tissue autonomy in cornea-skin recombinants

Developmental autonomy of corneal epithelial and stromal components was assessed by their subsequent differentiation after recombination with feather-forming thigh dermis and epidermis, respectively. Work by others has shown that feather-forming dermis exhibits strong inductive ability when used in such epithelial-mesenchymal recombinations. After culture of the recombinants on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of host embryos, differentiation as "cornea" was assessed immunohistochemically using the anti-corneal stromal matrix and anti-corneal epithelial antibodies described previously (Zak and Linsenmayer, Dev. Biol. 99, 373-381, 1983). Feather initiation and outgrowth and keratin synthesis served as markers for differentiation as skin. It has been found that corneal epithelia from 5-day embryos, when grown in association with feather-forming dermis from the thigh, will participate in feather formation. In such recombinants, when the corneal epithelium became incorporated into feathers it failed to express the corneal epithelial antigen, but in regions of the recombinant where feathers did not form, de novo expression of the antigen was sometimes detected. The limited liability of the epithelium is not present in corneal epithelia taken from embryos a day or two older. When such epithelia were used for making the recombinants, no feathers were formed and the corneal epithelial antigen was extensively produced. Thus epithelial determination occurs long before the epithelium would begin to overtly differentiate and express the epithelial antigen in vivo (about 12 days of development). In reciprocal recombinations of corneal stromas with feather-forming epidermis, the stromas proceeded to express the corneal stromal matrix specific antigen de novo after culture on the CAM. They did not, however, redirect differentiation of the epidermis which never expressed the corneal epithelial antigen and in some cases went on to keratinize. These results indicate that development of both the corneal epithelial and stromal components becomes autonomous at least several days before these tissues overtly differentiate. This suggests that the component tissues of the cornea may not interact in a manner typical of those of other organs which, in general, are thought to require continual interaction of their epithelial and mesenchymal components for normal development.     

Scale induction in the chick amnionic ectoderm attached to tarsometatarsal skin dermis

Under the influence of tarsometatarsal dermis of 13-17-day chick embryos, 6.8-day amnionic ectoderm can form scales and express keratins specific for scales. In contrast, 10.5-day shank dermis can induce both feather filaments and scales in the amnionic ectoderm.     

Origin of feathers: Feather beta (beta) keratins are expressed in discrete epidermal cell populations of embryonic scutate scales

The feathers of birds develop from embryonic epidermal lineages that differentiate during outgrowth of the feather germ. Independent cell populations also form an embryonic epidermis on scutate scales, which consists of peridermal layers, a subperiderm, and an alpha stratum. Using an antiserum (anti-FbetaK) developed to react specifically with the beta (beta) keratins of feathers, we find that the feather-type beta keratins are expressed in the subperiderm cells of embryonic scutate scales, as well as the barb ridge lineages of the feather. However, unlike the subperiderm of scales, which is lost at hatching, the cells of barb ridges, in conjunction with adjacent cell populations, give rise to the structural elements of the feather. The observation that an embryonic epidermis, consisting of peridermal and subperidermal layers, also characterizes alligator scales (Thompson, 2001. J Anat 198:265-282) suggests that the epidermal populations of the scales and feathers of avian embryos are homologous with those forming the embryonic epidermis of alligators. While the embryonic epidermal populations of archosaurian scales are discarded at hatching, those of the feather germ differentiate into the periderm, sheath, barb ridges, axial plates, barbules, and marginal plates of the embryonic feather filament. We propose that the development of the embryonic feather filament provides a model for the evolution of the first protofeather. Furthermore, we hypothesize that invagination of the epidermal lineages of the feather filament, namely the barb ridges, initiated the formation of the follicle, which then allowed continuous renewal of the feather epidermal lineages, and the evolution of diverse feather forms.     

Molecular mechanisms controlling dorsal dermis generation from the somitic dermomyotome

The initiation of the development of skin appendages (hair/feathers/scales) requires a signal from the competent dense dermis to the epidermis (Dhouailly, 1977). It is therefore essential to understand how to make a competent dermis. In recent years, a few studies have focused on the development of the dorsal dermis from the somitic dermomyotome. Our first aim in this review is to attempt to reconcile the available data on the origin of the dorsal dermis and summarize the present knowledge on the molecular mechanisms implicated in dermal lineage induction. Secondly, we open the discussion on the formation of a loose pre-dermal mesenchyme and more importantly of a dense dermis capable of participating in appendage development. To go further we draw a comparison between the chick and mouse systems to gain a new insight into how to initiate appendage morphogenesis and regulate the extent of hair/feather fields.     

Epidermal-dermal tissue interactions between mutant and normal embryonic back skin: site of mutant gene activity determining abnormal feathering is in the epidermis.

The site of the scaleless gene's activity in the development of abnormal feathers was determined by reciprocally recombining epidermis and dermis between normal and scaleless chick embryos and culturing the recombinants for seven days on the chorioallantoic membrane. When recombined with a common dermal source, feather development is enhanced by scaleless high line as compared to scaleless low line epidermis. Against a common responding tissue, 7-day normal back epidermis, significant differences were not found in feather inducing ability between normal, scaleless high line and scaleless low line dermis. It was concluded that, in relation to abnormal feathering, these tissue interactions reveal that the site of the scaleless gene's activity is the epidermis. A model of tissue interaction in the development of normal and abnormal feathers is presented. According to the model, the focus of the scaleless mutation and the genes accumulated by selection for high or low feather numbers is the epidermis, the effect being that the reactivity of the epidermis to dermal stimuli is altered. Subsequently, the epidermis controls the morphogenetic organization of the dermis. The scaleless dermis is presumed to contain normal positional information for the determination of feather structure and pattern.     

Analysis of morphogenesis and keratinization in transfilter recombinants of feather-forming skin

The relationships between feather morphogenesis, histogenesis, and biochemical differentiation were examined by recombining backskin epidermis and dermis, from chick embryos (Hamburger-Hamilton stages 27-31), with an intervening Nucleopore filter (pore size of 0.4 micron). The filter inhibited normal feather morphogenesis and histogenesis of barb ridges, yet feather-like filaments, which were free of dermal cells, formed from the epidermal cells. Using indirect immunofluorescence, with antiserum against alpha- and beta-keratins, the biochemical differentiation of the feather-like filaments was compared to normal feathers. In the feather-like filaments resulting from tissues of stages 27-29, cells containing beta keratins were occasionally seen at the periphery of the filaments, yet cells containing alpha-keratins were inappropriately located throughout the filaments. In a few feather-like filaments on recombinants resulting from tissues of stages 29.5-31, cells positive for beta-keratins were found in the center of the filament, but again alpha-keratins were also found. Surrounding these cells there were several layers of cells, arranged circumferentially, resembling sheath cells. Some sheath-like cells contained beta-keratins. We conclude that although feather epidermal cells, which are separated from their dermis by a Nuclepore filter, can undergo limited morphogenesis and the production of alpha- and beta-keratins, normal feather morphogenesis, histogenesis, and biochemical differentiation require the intimate associations of epidermis and dermis.     

Region-specific expression of scutate scale type beta keratins in the developing chick beak.

This study shows that different patterns of scutate scale type beta keratins are accumulated in the three adjacent structures of the embryonic chick beak: periderm, egg tooth, and cornified beak. The cornified beak accumulates all of the beta keratins of scutate scale except pp2,3. The periderm, which is the outermost, multilayered covering of the whole embryonic beak, accumulates only beta keratins 2,3, and p2,3 of the scutate scale pattern. The egg tooth, which is the rounded elevation on the dorsal surface of the upper beak, and the embryonic claw accumulate greatly reduced levels of 2,3 and p2,3 compared to scutate scale. Like cornified beak, the claw does not accumulate pp2,3, but both tissues express a potentially new beta keratin, beta keratin 8. Neither the histidine rich "fast" proteins (HRPs), which are expressed in embryonic scutate scales and feathers, nor the avian cytokeratin associated proteins (cap-1 and cap-2), which are expressed in scutate and reticulate scales, are expressed in any of the embryonic beak structures or in the claw. The implications of these findings with regard to regulation of terminal differentiation of avian skin are discussed.     

Differences in the histogenesis and keratin expression of avian extraembryonic ectoderm and endoderm recombined with dermis

The responses of the chorionic ectoderm and allantoic endoderm (from 8-day chick embryos) to dermal induction were compared through tissue recombinants grafted onto the chorioallantoic membrane. The chorionic epithelium formed the appropriate epidermis with a fully developed stratum corneum in response to both spur and scutate scale dermises. Analysis of these recombinant epidermal tissues by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) demonstrated that tissue-specific expression of the alpha (alpha) and beta (beta) keratin polypeptides occurred. In addition, indirect immunofluorescence studies with antisera to alpha or beta keratins showed that the beta stratum, which characterizes the epidermis of spurs and scutate scales, was formed, and the alpha keratins were distributed as in the normal epidermal tissues. In contrast, although the allantoic endoderm became stratified in association with either spur or scutate scale dermis, a stratum corneum with a beta stratum did not develop. SDS-PAGE analysis demonstrated that while the characteristic beta keratins of scutate scales and spur were not detected, most of the alpha keratins normally elaborated by these structures were present, suggesting that even without histogenesis of a stratum corneum the expression of alpha keratins of endoderm could be regulated in a tissue-specific manner by dermis. This study also demonstrated that there are differences in the abilities of the chorionic and allantoic epithelia to respond to the same dermal cues, which may reflect earlier restrictions in their developmental potentials.     

Development of sensory innervation in chick skin: comparison of nerve fibre and chondroitin sulphate distributions in vivo and in vitro

In bird skin, nerve fibres develop in the dermis but do not enter the epidermis. In co-cultures of 7-day-old chick embryo dorsal root ganglia and epidermis, the neurites also avoid the epidermis. Previous studies have shown that chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans may be involved. Chondroitin sulphate has therefore been visualized by immunocytochemistry, using themonoclonal antibody CS-56, both in vivo and in vitro using light and electron microscopy. Its distribution was compared to those of 2 other chondroitin sulphate epitopes and to that of the growing nerve fibres. In cultures of epidermis from 7-day-old embryonic chicks, immunoreactivity is found uniformly around the epidermal cells while at 7.5 days the distribution in dermis is heterogeneous, and particularly marked in feather buds. In vivo, chondroitin sulphate immunoreactivity is detected in the epidermis, on the basal lamina, on the surfaces of fibroblasts and along collagen fibrils. This localization is complementary to the distribution of cutaneous nerves. Chondroitin sulphate in the basal lamina could prevent innervation of the epidermis and the dermal heterogeneities could partly explain the nerve fibres surrounding the base of the feathers. Chondroitin sulphate could therefore be important for neural guidance in developing chick skin.     

Signaling dynamics of feather tract formation from the chick somatopleure

In the chick, most feathers are restricted to specific areas of the skin, the feather tracts or pterylae, while other areas, such as the apteria, remain bare. In the embryo, the expansion and closure of the somatopleure leads to the juxtaposition of the ventral pteryla, midventral apterium and amnion. The embryonic proximal somatopleural mesoderm is determined to form a feather-forming dermis at 2 days of incubation (E2), while the embryonic distal and the extra-embryonic somatopleure remain open to determination. We found a progressive, lateral expression of Noggin in the embryonic area, and downregulation of Msx1, a BMP4 target gene, with Msx1 expression being ultimately restricted to the most distal embryonic and extra-embryonic somatopleural mesoderm. Msx1 downregulation thus correlates with the formation of the pterylae, and its maintenance to that of the apterium. Suspecting that the inhibition of BMP4 signaling might be linked to the determination of a feather-forming dermis, we grafted Noggin-expressing cells in the distal somatopleure at E2. This elicited the formation of a supplementary pteryla in the midventral apterium. Endogenous Noggin, which is secreted by the intermediate mesoderm at E2, then by the proximal somatopleure at E4, could be sufficient to suppress BMP4 signaling in the proximal somatopleural mesoderm and then in part of the distal somatopleure, thus in turn allowing the formation of the dense dermis of the future pterylae. The same result was obtained with the graft of Shh-producing cells, but Noggin and Shh are both required in order to change the future amnion into a feather-bearing skin. A possible synergistic role of endogenous Shh from the embryonic endoderm remains to be confirmed.     

Origin of cutaneous smooth muscles in birds (author's transl)

The origin of smooth muscles in the skin of bird embryos has been analyzed in heterospecific quail/chick recombinants. The somitic mesoderm of the wing level of 2-day chick embryos was replaced by homotopic or heterotopic somitic mesoderm from quail embryos. The cellular constitution of tissues was observed in twelve recombinant embryos at 17 or 18 days of incubation. Results show that feather smooth muscles and vascular smooth muscles have the same origin as the cutaneous mesenchyme in which they differentiate. They are of somatopleural origin in the wing integument and of somitic (dermatomal) origin in the dorsal integument. This study further reveals that the muscular and connective tissue wall of blood vessels does not have the same embryonic origin as the endothelium. It is suggested that the latter originates from the primitive aorta.     

Region-specific deposition of dermal proteins between dermis and epidermis during induction of chick feather and scale rudiments

To begin to study the role of particular proteins in inductive tissue interactions, we have used density labelling techniques to determine whether any dermal proteins are found between embryonic chick dermis and epidermis at a stage when the dermis plays an important inductive role in epidermal differentiation. Epidermis will form feathers or scales depending on whether it interacts with dorsal or foot dermis, respectively, and the dermis can still influence epidermal differentiation when direct cell contact between the tissues is blocked by a membrane filter during culturing (Peterson & Grainger, 1985). In transfilter experiments, we detect a subset of dermal proteins within the filter between the tissues. Several of these dermal proteins are deposited in a region-specific manner, that is, they are only found associated with filters from either dorsal or foot dermis. We have previously shown that the expression of some of these proteins is specific to particular regions of dermis and is also associated with the inductive potential of the dermis (Peterson & Grainger, 1986). We detect only 17 dermal proteins which are transferred across the filter in these cultures and found in direct association with epidermis; of these 14 are common to both dorsal and foot dermis, and 3 are deposited in a region-specific manner. Our results lead us to hypothesize a significant function for certain dermal proteins in this inductive interaction either as part of the extracellular matrix or in direct association with epidermis.     

Avian skin development and the evolutionary origin of feathers

The discovery of several dinosaurs with filamentous integumentary appendages of different morphologies has stimulated models for the evolutionary origin of feathers. In order to understand these models, knowledge of the development of the avian integument must be put into an evolutionary context. Thus, we present a review of avian scale and feather development, which summarizes the morphogenetic events involved, as well as the expression of the beta (beta) keratin multigene family that characterizes the epidermal appendages of reptiles and birds. First we review information on the evolution of the ectodermal epidermis and its beta (beta) keratins. Then we examine the morphogenesis of scutate scales and feathers including studies in which the extraembryonic ectoderm of the chorion is used to examine dermal induction. We also present studies on the scaleless (sc) mutant, and, because of the recent discovery of "four-winged" dinosaurs, we review earlier studies of a chicken strain, Silkie, that expresses ptilopody (pti), "feathered feet." We conclude that the ability of the ectodermal epidermis to generate discrete cell populations capable of forming functional structural elements consisting of specific members of the beta keratin multigene family was a plesiomorphic feature of the archosaurian ancestor of crocodilians and birds. Evidence suggests that the discrete epidermal lineages that make up the embryonic feather filament of extant birds are homologous with similar embryonic lineages of the developing scutate scales of birds and the scales of alligators. We believe that the early expression of conserved signaling modules in the embryonic skin of the avian ancestor led to the early morphogenesis of the embryonic feather filament, with its periderm, sheath, and barb ridge lineages forming the first protofeather. Invagination of the epidermis of the protofeather led to formation of the follicle providing for feather renewal and diversification. The observations that scale formation in birds involves an inhibition of feather formation coupled with observations on the feathered feet of the scaleless (High-line) and Silkie strains support the view that the ancestor of modern birds may have had feathered hind limbs similar to those recently discovered in nonavian dromaeosaurids. And finally, our recent observation on the bristles of the wild turkey beard raises the possibility that similar integumentary appendages may have adorned nonavian dinosaurs, and thus all filamentous integumentary appendages may not be homologous to modern feathers.     

Cytochemical and molecular characteristics of the process of cornification during feather morphogenesis

Feathers are the most complex epidermal derivatives among vertebrates. The present review deals with the origin of feathers from archosaurian reptiles, the cellular and molecular aspects of feather morphogenesis, and focus on the synthesis of keratins and associated proteins. Feathers consist of different proteins among which exists a specialized group of small proteins called beta-keratins. Genes encoding these proteins in the chick genome are distributed in different chromosomes, and most genes encode for feather keratins. The latter are here recognized as proteins associated with the keratins of intermediate filaments, and functionally correspond to keratin-associated proteins of hairs, nails and horns in mammals. These small proteins possess unique properties, including resistance and scarce elasticity, and were inherited and modified in feathers from ancestral proteins present in the scales of archosaurian progenitors of birds. The proteins share a common structural motif, the core box, which was present in the proteins of the reptilian ancestors of birds. The core box allows the formation of filaments with a different molecular mechanism of polymerization from that of alpha-keratins. Feathers evolved after the establishment of a special morphogenetic mechanism gave rise to barb ridges. During development, the epidermal layers of feathers fold to produce barb ridges that produce the ramified structure of feathers. Among barb ridge cells, those of barb and barbules initially accumulate small amounts of alpha-keratins that are rapidly replaced by a small protein indicated as “feather keratin”. This 10 kDa protein becomes the predominant form of corneous material of feathers. The main characteristics of feather keratins, their gene organization and biosynthesis are similar to those of their reptilian ancestors. Feather keratins allow elongation of feather cells among supportive cells that later degenerate and leave the ramified microstructure of barbs. In downfeathers, barbs are initially independent and form plumulaceous feathers that rest inside a follicle. Stem cells remain in the follicle and are responsible for the regeneration of pennaceous feathers. New barb ridges are produced and they merge to produce a rachis and a flat vane. The modulation of the growth pattern of barb ridges and their fusion into a rachis give rise to a broad variety of feather types, including asymmetric feathers for flight. Feather morphogenesis suggests possible stages for feather evolution and diversification from hair-like outgrowths of the skin found in fossils of pro-avian archosaurians.     

Review: cornification,morphogenesis and evolution of feathers

Feathers are corneous microramifications of variable complexity derived from the morphogenesis of barb ridges. Histological and ultrastructural analyses on developing and regenerating feathers clarify the three-dimensional organization of cells in barb ridges. Feather cells derive from folds of the embryonic epithelium of feather germs from which barb/barbule cells and supportive cells organize in a branching structure. The following degeneration of supportive cells allows the separation of barbule cells which are made of corneous beta-proteins and of lower amounts of intermediate filament (IF)(alpha) keratins, histidine-rich proteins, and corneous proteins of the epidermal differentiation complex. The specific protein association gives rise to a corneous material with specific biomechanic properties in barbules, rami, rachis, or calamus. During the evolution of different feather types, a large expansion of the genome coding for corneous feather beta-proteins occurred and formed 3–4-nm-thick filaments through a different mechanism from that of 8–10 nm IF keratins. In the chick, over 130 genes mainly localized in chromosomes 27 and 25 encode feather corneous beta-proteins of 10–12 kDa containing 97–105 amino acids. About 35 genes localized in chromosome 25 code for scale proteins (14–16 kDa made of 122–146 amino acids), claws and beak proteins (14–17 kDa proteins of 134–164 amino acids). Feather morphogenesis is periodically re-activated to produce replacement feathers, and multiple feather types can result from the interactions of epidermal and dermal tissues. The review shows schematic models explaining the translation of the morphogenesis of barb ridges present in the follicle into the three-dimensional shape of the main types of branched or un-branched feathers such as plumulaceous, pennaceous, filoplumes, and bristles. The temporal pattern of formation of barb ridges in different feather types and the molecular control from the dermal papilla through signaling molecules are poorly known. The evolution and diversification of the process of morphogenesis of barb ridges and patterns of their formation within feathers follicle allowed the origin and diversification of numerous types of feathers, including the asymmetric planar feathers for flight.     

Regional specification of cutaneous appendages in mammals

Summary The problem of the regional specification of snout vibrissae and dorsal pelage hairs has been analysed in mouse embryos. Reconstituted homo-and heterotopic skin explants, consisting of epidermis and dermis from both regions, were cultured on the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick embryo.Recombinants of 12.5-day upper lip dermis and 12.5-day dorsal epidermis developed a small number of large vibrissal type follicles arranged in a recognizable rectangular vibrissal pattern. The reverse combinations of 12.5- or 14.5-day dorsal dermis and 11- to 12.5-day upper lip epidermis formed a single population of numerous and small follicles arranged in a typical pelage hair pattern (trio groups) or gave rise to a mixed population of follicles with both whiskers and pelage hairs.It is concluded that the dermis is responsible for the regional specification of the cutaneous appendages and their distribution pattern. However, at the time it was isolated, the upper lip epidermis already possesses the information for the morphogenesis of vibrissae, but remains malleable and responsive to the dermal influence.This work was supported in part by DGRST and CNRS     

Contribution of BDNF-mediated inhibition in patterning avian skin innervation

Multiple factors are involved in the development and regulation of sensory innervation in skin. The findings we report here suggest that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-mediated inhibition may play an important role in determining the pattern of sensory innervation in avian skin. In birds, cutaneous innervation is restricted to dermis, where axons form a ring of innervation around the base of each feather. Here we show that both BDNF message and protein are more abundant in avian epidermis than dermis when innervation is being established; the BDNF in dermis is localized to feather buds. In vitro, BDNF caused growth cones of NGF-dependent dorsal root ganglion neurons to collapse. Similarly, outgrowth of neurites toward BDNF-secreting fibroblasts was inhibited. The inhibitory effects of BDNF appear to be mediated by the low-affinity p75 neurotrophin receptor, rather than a trk receptor. Thus, the distribution of BDNF in embryonic avian skin and the inhibitory effects of BDNF on cutaneous neurites in vitro suggest that BDNF may be important in restricting axons from entering the epidermis and the core of feather buds during development in vivo.