Reduced severity of Rh-haemolytic disease after anti-D immunoglobulin.

A total of 2459 Rh-negative women who received anti-D immunoglobulin after a Rh-positive pregnancy were followed up in at least one subsequent pregnancy. There was a failure of protection rate of 1-6%. Follow-up of 53 subsequent infants of mother in whom protection had failed showed that the infants were less severely affected than would have been expected. This was confirmed by a comparative statistical analysis of the present series and a series of first affected cases before anti-D immunoglobulin was available, using the antibody titre during pregnancy and the haemoglobin levels at delivery.     

Prevention of Rh-haemolytic Disease: Results of the Liverpool “Low-risk” Clinical Trial

A clinical trial is reported in which Rh-negative primiparae, just delivered of an Rh-positive ABO-compatible infant and in whom fetal cell counts after delivery suggested less than 0·2 ml of circulating fetal blood, were treated with about 200 μg of anti-D gammaglobulin. Three (0·36%) out of 844 women thus treated developed anti-D in the subsequent six months; this is 10% of the incidence in untreated controls. Three (1·8%) out of 171 treated mothers had anti-D at the end of the second Rh-positive pregnancy, and this is 18% of the incidence in controls.Possible reasons for the occasional failure of the treatment are discussed and the results of this trial are compared with those of a previous trial in which 1,000 μg or more of anti-D was given to a different group of mothers. The combined results of the two trials lead to the conclusion that the passive administration of anti-D gammaglobulin after delivery affords in this population of Rh-negative women a 95% protection rate in the postdelivery period and an 89% protection rate by the end of the subsequent pregnancy.     

Prevention of Rh haemolytic disease.

Between 1970 and 1976 in the Yorkshire region the incidence of Rh antibodies in Rh-negative pregnant women fell by 70%. This decrease occurred in both old (long-standing) and new (first-affected) cases, which emphasised that the reduction in numbers was as much due to fewer pregnancies among Rh-negative mothers as to administration of anti-D immunoglobulin. Nevertheless, the incidence has begun to level out. The continued incidence of first-affected cases is caused by three main factors: failure of administration of anti-D immunoglobulin after normal deliveries and abortions; a steady incidence of antibodies in primigravidae; and cases in which administration of anti-D immunoglobulin had failed to protect. Administering anti-D antenatally might reduce the incidence of new cases among primigravidae who are sensitised before anti-D is normally given. Even without routine antenatal administration of anti-D, the incidence of severely affected Rh babies in the Yorkshire region could be reduced to one or two isolated cases a year in a population of three to four million by administering anti-D after all Rh-negative deliveries and after every abortion.     

Prevention of Rh-haemolytic Disease: Final Results of the “High-risk” Clinical Trial: A COMBINED STUDY FROM CENTRES IN ENGLAND AND BALTIMORE

The final results are reported of a trial of about 1,000 μg of anti-D gammaglobulin given intramuscularly to a selected high-risk group of Rh-negative primiparae just delivered of an ABO-compatible Rh-positive baby, the aim being to prevent them becoming immunized to Rh. Six months after delivery only 1 out of 173 treated mothers had been immunized as against 38 out of 176 controls. The crucial test of the prophylactic therapy depends on the presence or otherwise of anti-D at the end of a second Rh-positive pregnancy. Of 86 treated mothers two had antibodies at this time compared with 20 out of 65 controls.The results show a high degree of protection in this group of mothers.