Diffusion of the second messengers in the cytoplasm acts as a variability suppressor of the single photon response in vertebrate phototransduction

The single photon response in vertebrate phototransduction is highly reproducible despite a number of random components of the activation cascade, including the random activation site, the random walk of an activated receptor, and its quenching in a random number of steps. Here we use a previously generated and tested spatiotemporal mathematical and computational model to identify possible mechanisms of variability reduction. The model permits one to separate the process into modules, and to analyze their impact separately. We show that the activation cascade is responsible for generation of variability, whereas diffusion of the second messengers is responsible for its suppression. Randomness of the activation site contributes at early times to the coefficient of variation of the photoresponse, whereas the Brownian path of a photoisomerized rhodopsin (Rh*) has a negligible effect. The major driver of variability is the turnoff mechanism of Rh*, which occurs essentially within the first 2-4 phosphorylated states of Rh*. Theoretically increasing the number of steps to quenching does not significantly decrease the corresponding coefficient of variation of the effector, in agreement with the biochemical limitations on the phosphorylated states of the receptor. Diffusion of the second messengers in the cytosol acts as a suppressor of the variability generated by the activation cascade. Calcium feedback has a negligible regulatory effect on the photocurrent variability. A comparative variability analysis has been conducted for the phototransduction in mouse and salamander, including a study of the effects of their anatomical differences such as incisures and photoreceptors geometry on variability generation and suppression.     

Multiple steps of phosphorylation of activated rhodopsin can account for the reproducibility of vertebrate rod single-photon responses

Single-photon responses (SPRs) in vertebrate rods are considerably less variable than expected if isomerized rhodopsin (R*) inactivated in a single, memoryless step, and no other variability-reducing mechanisms were available. We present a new stochastic model, the core of which is the successive ratcheting down of R* activity, and a concomitant increase in the probability of quenching of R* by arrestin (Arr), with each phosphorylation of R* (Gibson, S.K., J.H. Parkes, and P.A. Liebman. 2000. Biochemistry. 39:5738-5749.). We evaluated the model by means of Monte-Carlo simulations of dim-flash responses, and compared the response statistics derived from them with those obtained from empirical dim-flash data (Whitlock, G.G., and T.D. Lamb. 1999. Neuron. 23:337-351.). The model accounts for four quantitative measures of SPR reproducibility. It also reproduces qualitative features of rod responses obtained with altered nucleotide levels, and thus contradicts the conclusion that such responses imply that phosphorylation cannot dominate R* inactivation (Rieke, F., and D.A. Baylor. 1998a. Biophys. J. 75:1836-1857; Field, G.D., and F. Rieke. 2002. Neuron. 35:733-747.). Moreover, the model is able to reproduce the salient qualitative features of SPRs obtained from mouse rods that had been genetically modified with specific pathways of R* inactivation or Ca2+ feedback disabled. We present a theoretical analysis showing that the variability of the area under the SPR estimates the variability of integrated R* activity, and can provide a valid gauge of the number of R* inactivation steps. We show that there is a heretofore unappreciated tradeoff between variability of SPR amplitude and SPR duration that depends critically on the kinetics of inactivation of R* relative to the net kinetics of the downstream reactions in the cascade. Because of this dependence, neither the variability of SPR amplitude nor duration provides a reliable estimate of the underlying variability of integrated R* activity, and cannot be used to estimate the minimum number of R* inactivation steps. We conclude that multiple phosphorylation-dependent decrements in R* activity (with Arr-quench) can confer the observed reproducibility of rod SPRs; there is no compelling need to invoke a long series of non-phosphorylation dependent state changes in R* (as in Rieke, F., and D.A. Baylor. 1998a. Biophys. J. 75:1836-1857; Field, G.D., and F. Rieke. 2002. Neuron. 35:733-747.). Our analyses, plus data and modeling of others (Rieke, F., and D.A. Baylor. 1998a. Biophys. J. 75:1836-1857; Field, G.D., and F. Rieke. 2002. Neuron. 35:733-747.), also argue strongly against either feedback (including Ca2+-feedback) or depletion of any molecular species downstream to R* as the dominant cause of SPR reproducibility.     

Piecing together the timetable for visual transduction with transgenic animals

Transgenic mice bearing null or functional mutations are being used to define the roles of specific elements in phototransduction and also to time the molecular interactions. Genetic manipulation of the collision frequency between rhodopsin and transducin molecules identified this parameter as rate-limiting for the photoresponse onset. Genetic interference with rhodopsin phosphorylation and arrestin binding, transducin shut-off and calcium feedback has revealed their respective roles in shaping the response waveform. The timetable for all of these molecular events determines the amplitude, kinetics and reproducibility of the photoresponse.     

G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin regulates the phosphorylation of retinal insulin receptor

We have shown previously that phosphoinositide 3-kinase in the retina is activated in vivo through light-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the insulin receptor (IR). The light effect is localized to photoreceptor neurons and is independent of insulin secretion (Rajala, R. V., McClellan, M. E., Ash, J. D., and Anderson, R. E. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 43319-43326). These results suggest that there exists a cross-talk between phototransduction and other signal transduction pathways. In this study, we examined the stage of phototransduction that is coupled to the activation of the IR. We studied IR phosphorylation in mice lacking the rod-specific alpha-subunit of transducin to determine if phototransduction events are required for IR activation. To confirm that light-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the IR is signaled through bleachable rhodopsin, we examined IR activation in retinas from RPE65(-/-) mice that are deficient in opsin chromophore. We observed that IR phosphorylation requires the photobleaching of rhodopsin but not transducin signaling. To determine whether the light-dependent activation of IR is mediated through the rod or cone transduction pathway, we studied the IR activation in mice lacking opsin, a mouse model of pure cone function. No light-dependent activation of the IR was found in the retinas of these mice. We provide evidence for the existence of a light-mediated IR pathway in the retina that is different from the known insulin-mediated pathway in nonneuronal tissues. These results suggest that IR phosphorylation in rod photoreceptors is signaled through the G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. This is the first study demonstrating that rhodopsin can initiate signaling pathway(s) in addition to its classical phototransduction.     

The kinetics of inactivation of the rod phototransduction cascade with constant Ca2+i

A rich variety of mechanisms govern the inactivation of the rod phototransduction cascade. These include rhodopsin phosphorylation and subsequent binding of arrestin; modulation of rhodopsin kinase by S- modulin (recoverin); regulation of G-protein and phosphodiesterase inactivation by GTPase-activating factors; and modulation of guanylyl cyclase by a high-affinity Ca(2+)-binding protein. The dependence of several of the inactivation mechanisms on Ca2+i makes it difficult to assess the contributions of these mechanisms to the recovery kinetics in situ, where Ca2+i is dynamically modulated during the photoresponse. We recorded the circulating currents of salamander rods, the inner segments of which are held in suction electrodes in Ringer's solution. We characterized the response kinetics to flashes under two conditions: when the outer segments are in Ringer's solution, and when they are in low-Ca2+ choline solutions, which we show clamp Ca2+i very near its resting level. At T = 20-22 degrees C, the recovery phases of responses to saturating flashes producing 10(2.5)-10(4.5) photoisomerizations under both conditions are characterized by a dominant time constant, tau c = 2.4 +/- 0.4 s, the value of which is not dependent on the solution bathing the outer segment and therefore not dependent on Ca2+i. We extended a successful model of activation by incorporating into it a first-order inactivation of R*, and a first-order, simultaneous inactivation of G-protein (G*) and phosphodiesterase (PDE*). We demonstrated that the inactivation kinetics of families of responses obtained with Ca2+i clamped to rest are well characterized by this model, having one of the two inactivation time constants (tau r* or tau PDE*) equal to tau c, and the other time constant equal to 0.4 +/- 0.06 s.     

Molecular properties of rhodopsin and rod function

Signal transduction in rod cells begins with photon absorption by rhodopsin and leads to the generation of an electrical response. The response profile is determined by the molecular properties of the phototransduction components. To examine how the molecular properties of rhodopsin correlate with the rod-response profile, we have generated a knock-in mouse with rhodopsin replaced by its E122Q mutant, which exhibits properties different from those of wild-type (WT) rhodopsin. Knock-in mouse rods with E122Q rhodopsin exhibited a photosensitivity about 70% of WT. Correspondingly, their single-photon response had an amplitude about 80% of WT, and a rate of decline from peak about 1.3 times of WT. The overall 30% lower photosensitivity of mutant rods can be explained by a lower pigment photosensitivity (0.9) and the smaller single-photon response (0.8). The slower decline of the response, however, did not correlate with the 10-fold shorter lifetime of the meta-II state of E122Q rhodopsin. This shorter lifetime became evident in the recovery phase of rod cells only when arrestin was absent. Simulation analysis of the photoresponse profile indicated that the slower decline and the smaller amplitude of the single-photon response can both be explained by the shift in the meta-I/meta-II equilibrium of E122Q rhodopsin toward meta-I. The difference in meta-III lifetime between WT and E122Q mutant became obvious in the recovery phase of the dark current after moderate photobleaching of rod cells. Thus, the present study clearly reveals how the molecular properties of rhodopsin affect the amplitude, shape, and kinetics of the rod response.     

A 48 kDa protein arrests cGMP phosphodiesterase activation in retinal rod disk membranes

Photolyzed rhodopsin (R) catalyzes GTP-binding to alpha-transducins (T alpha); T alpha X GTPs then activate cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE). PDE activation is arrested by ATP in two ways: (i) initial velocity is suppressed, and (ii) PDE velocity rapidly returns to preactivation levels (turnoff). Arrestin (a 48 kDa protein) markedly enhances turnoff while not affecting initial velocity. Arrestin in the presence of ATP achieves rapid turnoff by directly inhibiting activated PDE, as indicated by its ability to inhibit the direct activation of PDE by T alpha X GMP--PNP (guanylyl-imidodiphosphate). Double reciprocal plots reveal a competition between arrestins and activated transducins for sites on PDE. Blocking R phosphorylation blocks initial velocity suppression but does not disturb rapid turnoff. Our data suggest a 2-fold mechanism for PDE deactivation: (i) formation of T alpha X GTPs is suppressed by R phosphorylation, while (ii) activation of PDE by T alpha X GTPs is competitively inhibited by arrestins when ATP is present.     

Dominant negative mutants of transducin-alpha that block activated receptor

Mutations counterpart to dominant negative RasSer17Asn in the alpha-subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins are known to also produce dominant negative effects. The mechanism of these mutations remains poorly understood. Here, we examined the effects and mechanism of the Ser43Cys and Ser43Asn mutants of transducin-like chimeric Gtalpha* in the visual signaling system. Our analysis showed that both mutants have reduced affinity for GDP and are likely to exist in an empty-or partially occupied-pocket state. S43C and S43N retained the ability to interact with Gtbetagamma and, as heterotrimeric proteins, bind to photoexcited rhodopsin (R*). The interaction with R* is unproductive as the mutants failed to bind GTPgammaS and become activated. S43C and S43N inhibited R*-dependent activation of Gtalpha* and Gtalpha, apparently by blocking R*. Finally, both Gtalpha* mutants lacked interaction with the gamma-subunit of PDE6, an effector protein in phototransduction. These results indicate that the S43C and S43N mutants of Gtalpha* are dominant negative inhibitors that bind and block the activated receptor in a mechanism that parallels that of RasSer17Asn. Dominant negative mutants of Gtalpha sequestering R*, such as S43C and S43N, may become useful instruments in probing the mechanisms of visual dysfunctions caused by abnormal phototransduction signaling.     

Overexpression of Rhodopsin Alters the Structure and Photoresponse of Rod Photoreceptors

Rhodopsins are densely packed in rod outer-segment membranes to maximize photon absorption, but this arrangement interferes with transducin activation by restricting the mobility of both proteins. We attempted to explore this phenomenon in transgenic mice that overexpressed rhodopsin in their rods. Photon capture was improved, and, for a given number of photoisomerizations, bright-flash responses rose more gradually with a reduction in amplification—but not because rhodopsins were more tightly packed in the membrane. Instead, rods increased their outer-segment diameters, accommodating the extra rhodopsins without changing the rhodopsin packing density. Because the expression of other phototransduction proteins did not increase, transducin and its effector phosphodiesterase were distributed over a larger surface area. That feature, as well as an increase in cytosolic volume, was responsible for delaying the onset of the photoresponse and for attenuating its amplification.     

Interaction between photoexcited rhodopsin and peripheral enzymes in frog retinal rods. Influence on the postmetarhodopsin II decay and phosphorylation rate of rhodopsin

The major peripheral and soluble proteins in frog rod outer segment preparations, and their interactions with photoexcited rhodopsin, have been compared to those in cattle rod outer segments and found to be similar in both systems. In particular the GTP-binding protein (G) has the same subunit composition, the same abundance relative to rhodopsin (1/10) and it undergoes the same light and nucleotide-dependent interactions with rhodopsin in both preparations. Previous work on cattle rod outer segments has shown that photoexcited rhodopsin (R*), in a state identified with metarhodopsin II, associates with the G protein as a first step to the light-activated GDP/GTP exchange on G. The complex R*-G is stable in absence of GTP, but is rapidly dissociated by GTP owing to the GDP/GTP exchange reaction. Low bleaching extents (less than 10% R*) in absence of GTP therefore create predominantly R*-G complexes, whereas bleaching in presence of GTP creates free R*. We report here that, under conditions of complexed R*, two reactions of R* in frog rod outer segments are highly perturbed as compared to free R*: (a) the spectral decay of metarhodopsin II (MII) into later photoproducts, and (b) the phosphorylation of R* by an ATP-dependent protein kinase. a) The spectral measurements have been performed using linear dichroism on oriented frog rod outer segments; this technique allows discrimination between MII and later photoproducts absorbing at the same wavelength. Association of R* with G leads to a strong reduction of the amount of MIII formed and to an acceleration of the decay of MIII. Furthermore, MII is significantly stabilized, in agreement with the hypothesis that MII is the intermediate which binds to G. b) The phosphorylation of R* is strongly inhibited under conditions of R*-G complex formation as compared to free R*. Interferences between reactions at the three sites involved in R* are discussed: the retinal binding site in the hydrophobic core is sensitive to the presence of GTP-binding protein at its binding site on the cytoplasmic surface of R*; the kinase and the GTP-binding protein compete for access to their respective binding sites, both located on the surface of R*. We also observed a slow and nucleotide-dependent light-induced binding of a protein of molecular weight 50 000, which we consider as the equivalent of the 48 000 Mr light-dependent protein previously identified in cattle rod outer segments.     

M opsin phosphorylation in intact mammalian retinas

The deactivation of visual pigments involved in phototransduction is critical for recovering sensitivity after exposure to light in rods and cones of the vertebrate retina. In rods, phosphorylation of rhodopsin by rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) and the subsequent binding of visual arrestin completely terminates phototransduction. Although signal termination in cones is predicted to occur via a similar mechanism as in rods, there may be differences due to the expression of related but distinct gene products. While rods only express GRK1, cones in some species express only GRK1 or GRK7 and others express both GRKs. In the mouse, cone opsin is phosphorylated by GRK1, but this has not been demonstrated in mammals that express GRK7 in cones. We compared cone opsin phosphorylation in intact retinas from the 13-lined ground squirrel (GS) and pig, cone- and rod-dominant mammals, respectively, which both express GRK7. M opsin phosphorylation increased during continuous exposure to light, then declined between 3 and 6 min. In contrast, rhodopsin phosphorylation continued to increase during this time period. In GS retina homogenates, anti-GS GRK7 antibody blocked M opsin phosphorylation by 73%. In pig retina homogenates, only 20% inhibition was observed, possibly due to phosphorylation by GRK1 released from rods during homogenization. Our results suggest that GRK7 phosphorylates M opsin in both of these mammals. Using an in vitro GTPgammaS binding assay, we also found that the ability of recombinant M opsin to activate G(t) was greatly reduced by phosphorylation. Therefore, phosphorylation may participate directly in the termination of phototransduction in cones by decreasing the activity of M opsin.     

Enhanced shutoff of phototransduction in transgenic mice expressing palmitoylation-deficient rhodopsin

Palmitoylation is a reversible, post-translational modification observed in a number of G-protein-coupled receptors. To gain a better understanding of its role in visual transduction, we produced transgenic knock-in mice that expressed a palmitoylation-deficient rhodopsin (Palm(-/-)). The mutant rhodopsin was expressed at wild-type levels and showed normal cellular localization to rod outer segments, indicating that neither rhodopsin stability nor its intracellular trafficking were compromised. But Palm(-/-) rods had briefer flash responses and reduced sensitivity to flashes and to steps of light. Upon exposure to light, rhodopsin became phosphorylated at a faster rate in mutant than in wild-type retinas. Since quench of rhodopsin begins with its phosphorylation, these results suggest that palmitoylation may modulate rod photoreceptor sensitivity by permitting rhodopsin to remain active for a longer period.     

Sequence of interactions in receptor-G protein coupling

Guanine nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins catalyzed by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a key event in many physiological processes. The crystal structures of the GPCR rhodopsin and two G proteins as well as binding sites on both catalytically interacting proteins are known, but the temporal sequence of events leading to nucleotide exchange remains to be elucidated. We employed time-resolved near infrared light scattering to study the order in which the Galpha and Ggamma C-terminal binding sites on the holo-G protein interact with the active state of the GPCR rhodopsin (R*) in native membranes. We investigated these key binding sites within mass-tagged peptides and G proteins and found that their binding to R* is mutually exclusive. The interaction of the holo-G protein with R* requires at least one of the lipid modifications of the G protein (i.e. myristoylation of the Galpha N terminus and/or farnesylation of the Ggamma C terminus). A holo-G protein with a high affinity Galpha C terminus shows a specific change of the reaction rate in the GDP release and GTP uptake steps of catalysis. We interpret the data by a sequential fit model where (i) the initial encounter between R* and the G protein occurs with the Gbetagamma subunit, and (ii) the Galpha C-terminal tail then interacts with R* to release bound GDP, thereby decreasing the affinity of R* for the Gbetagamma subunit. The mechanism limits the time in which both C-terminal binding sites of the G protein interact simultaneously with R* to a short lived transitory state.     

Rhodopsin-regulated Insulin Receptor Signaling Pathway in Rod Photoreceptor Neurons

The retina is an integral part of the central nervous system and retinal cells are known to express insulin receptors (IR), although their function is not known. This article describes recent studies that link the photoactivation of rhodopsin to tyrosine phosphorylation of the IR and subsequent activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, a neuron survival factor. Our studies suggest that the physiological role of this process is to provide neuroprotection of the retina against light damage by activating proteins that protect against stress-induced apoptosis. We focus mainly on our recently identified regulation of the IR pathway through the G-protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. Various mutant and knockout proteins of phototransduction cascade have been used to study the light-induced activation of the retinal IR. Our studies suggest that rhodopsin may have additional previously uncharacterized signaling functions in photoreceptors.     

Fast Electrical Potential from a Long-Lived,Long-Wavelength Photoproduct of Fly Visual Pigment

A rapid electrical potential, which we have named the M-potential, can be obtained from the Drosophila eye using a high energy flash stimulus. The potential can be elicited from the normal fly, but it is especially prominent in the mutant norp A^P12 (a phototransduction mutant), particularly if the eye color pigments are genetically removed from the eye. Several lines of evidence suggest that the M-potential arises from photoexcitation of long-lived metarhodopsin. Photoexcitation of rhodopsin does not produce a comparable potential. The spectral sensitivity of the M-potential peaks at about 575 nm. The M-potential pigment (metarhodopsin) can be shown to photoconvert back and forth with a "silent pigment(s)" absorbing maximally at about 485 nm. The silent pigment presumably is rhodopsin. These results support the recent spectrophotometric findings that dipteran metarhodopsin absorbs at much longer wavelengths than rhodopsin. The M-potential probably is related to the photoproduct component of the early receptor potential (ERP). Two major differences between the M-potential and the classical ERP are: (a) Drosophila rhodopsin does not produce a rapid photoresponse, and (b) an anesthetized or freshly sacrificed animal does not yield the M-potential. As in the case of the ERP, the M-potential appears to be a response associated with a particular state of the fly visual pigment. Therefore, it should be useful in in vivo investigations of the fly visual pigment, about which little is known.     

Involvement of protein kinase C in the phosphorylation of rhodopsin

The possibility that protein kinase C is involved in phototransduction by phosphorylating rhodopsin was explored in situ and in vitro. Pretreatment of intact retinas with phorbol myristate acetate markedly increased the light-dependent phosphorylation of rhodopsin, with the greatest effects observed at lower light levels. Phorbol myristate acetate treatment did not affect rhodopsin phosphorylation in retinas not exposed to light, suggesting that protein kinase C modulates the phosphorylation state of rhodopsin in a light-dependent manner. Limited proteolysis of rhodopsin phosphorylated in situ indicates that protein kinase C modifies rhodopsin on a domain distinct from that recognized by rhodopsin kinase. In vitro, protein kinase C purified from bovine retinas phosphorylated unbleached and bleached rhodopsin. Our results are consistent with protein kinase C phosphorylating unbleached rhodopsin in response to low light, suggesting that protein kinase C plays a role in light adaptation.     

Ca2+/recoverin dependent regulation of phosphorylation of the rhodopsin mutant R135L associated with retinitis pigmentosa

No single molecular mechanism accounts for the effect of mutations in rhodopsin associated with retinitis pigmentosa. Here we report on the specific effect of a Ca2+/recoverin upon phosphorylation of the autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa R135L rhodopsin mutant. This mutant shows specific features like impaired G-protein signaling but enhanced phosphorylation in the shut-off process. We now report that R135L hyperphosphorylation by rhodopsin kinase is less efficiently inhibited by Ca2+/recoverin than wild-type rhodopsin. This suggests an involvement of Ca2+/recoverin into the molecular pathogenic effect of the mutation in retinitis pigmentosa which is the cause of rod photoreceptor cell degeneration. This new proposed role of Ca2+/recoverin may be one of the specific features of the proposed new Type III class or rhodopsin mutations associated with retinitis pigmentosa.     

Determinants of single photon response variability

The responses to single photon absorptions (quantum bumps) vary randomly in size in Limulus photoreceptors. This variability is a natural consequence of simple chemical reactions involving a small number of molecules. The measured size distributions differ significantly from the exponential distribution predicted by the simplest transduction cascade models, one feature of which is that light-activated rhodopsin (R*) is turned off in a single step process. As shown in the companion paper, the nonexponential size distributions can be accounted for if R* is turned off in a multi-step process. This would lead to a nonexponential (peaked) distribution in the number of G- protein molecules activated during a quantum bump and to a nonexponential distribution in the size of bumps. To test this possibility we measured the distribution of quantum bump size under two conditions in which the variability in the number of activated G- proteins was eliminated. eliminated. In one method, bumps were produced by direct activation of single G-proteins using GTP-gamma-S; in the second GDP-beta-S reduced the R* gain to the point where most quantal events were due to activation of a single G-protein. In both cases the size distribution of bumps became much closer to an exponential distribution than that of normal light-induced bumps. These results support the idea that the size distribution of light-induced bumps is dependent on events at the R* level and reflects to the multi-step deactivation of R*.     

RGS expression rate-limits recovery of rod photoresponses

Signaling through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) underlies many cellular processes, yet it is not known which molecules determine the duration of signaling in intact cells. Two candidates are G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and Regulators of G protein signaling (RGSs), deactivation enzymes for GPCRs and G proteins, respectively. Here we investigate whether GRK or RGS governs the overall rate of recovery of the light response in mammalian rod photoreceptors, a model system for studying GPCR signaling. We show that overexpression of rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) increases phosphorylation of the GPCR rhodopsin but has no effect on photoresponse recovery. In contrast, overexpression of the photoreceptor RGS complex (RGS9-1.Gbeta5L.R9AP) dramatically accelerates response recovery. Our results show that G protein deactivation is normally at least 2.5 times slower than rhodopsin deactivation, resolving a long-standing controversy concerning the mechanism underlying the recovery of rod visual transduction.     

Physiological properties of rod photoreceptor cells in green-sensitive cone pigment knock-in mice

Rod and cone photoreceptor cells that are responsible for scotopic and photopic vision, respectively, exhibit photoresponses different from each other and contain similar phototransduction proteins with distinctive molecular properties. To investigate the contribution of the different molecular properties of visual pigments to the responses of the photoreceptor cells, we have generated knock-in mice in which rod visual pigment (rhodopsin) was replaced with mouse green-sensitive cone visual pigment (mouse green). The mouse green was successfully transported to the rod outer segments, though the expression of mouse green in homozygous retina was approximately 11% of rhodopsin in wild-type retina. Single-cell recordings of wild-type and homozygous rods suggested that the flash sensitivity and the single-photon responses from mouse green were three to fourfold lower than those from rhodopsin after correction for the differences in cell volume and levels of several signal transduction proteins. Subsequent measurements using heterozygous rods expressing both mouse green and rhodopsin E122Q mutant, where these pigments in the same rod cells can be selectively irradiated due to their distinctive absorption maxima, clearly showed that the photoresponse of mouse green was threefold lower than that of rhodopsin. Noise analysis indicated that the rate of thermal activations of mouse green was 1.7 x 10(-7) s(-1), about 860-fold higher than that of rhodopsin. The increase in thermal activation of mouse green relative to that of rhodopsin results in only 4% reduction of rod photosensitivity for bright lights, but would instead be expected to severely affect the visual threshold under dim-light conditions. Therefore, the abilities of rhodopsin to generate a large single photon response and to retain high thermal stability in darkness are factors that have been necessary for the evolution of scotopic vision.