Genetic metabolic polymorphisms and the risk of cancer: a review of the literature

The purpose of this paper is to systematically analyse the design and results of epidemiological studies on the association between various types of cancer (lung, bladder, breast, colon, stomach) and four genetically-based metabolic polymorphisms, involved in the metabolism of several carcinogens (glutathione-S-transferase M1, debrisoquine hydroxylase, N acetyltransferase, aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase). These inherited polymorphisms usually cause modifications in the quality or quantity of the relevant enzymes. Such enzymes are involved in the activation/inactivation of known carcinogens and seem to modify the extent to which carcinogens interact with DNA in target tissues. Two enzymes, debrisoquine hydroxylase and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase, activate procarcinogens to carcinogens (phase I enzymes). The other two, glutathione-S-transferase M1 and N-acetyltransferase, mainly detoxity carcinogenic substances (phase II enzymes). Because of their role as host factors (modulating the action of carcinogens), it has been hypothesized that subjects presenting a specific phenotype for such polymorphisms could be at a greater risk of developing various types of cancer. A number of epidemiological studies have investigated such associations, often with discordant results. We examine and discuss the design of the studies, and present a meta-analysis of the available data.     

Genetic metabolic polymorphisms and the risk of cancer: a review of the literature

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to systematically analyse the design and results of epidemiological studies on the association between various types of cancer (lung, bladder, breast, colon, stomach) and four genetically-based metabolic polymorphisms, involved in the metabolism of several carcinogens (glutathione-S-transferase M1, debrisoquine hydroxylase, N acetyltransferase, aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase). These inherited polymorphisms usually cause modifications in the quality or quantity of the relevant enzymes. Such enzymes are involved in the activation/inactivation of known carcinogens and seem to modify the extent to which carcinogens interact with DNA in target tissues. Two enzymes, debrisoquine hydroxylase and aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase, activate procarcinogens to carcinogens (phase I enzymes). The other two, glutathione-S-transferase M1 and N-acetyltransferase, mainly detoxity carcinogenic substances (phase II enzymes). Because of their role as host factors (modulating the action of carcinogens), it has been hypothesized that subjects presenting a specific phenotype for such polymorphisms could be at a greater risk of developing various types of cancer. A number of epidemiological studies have investigated such associations, often with discordant results. We examine and discuss the design of the studies, and present a meta-analysis of the available data.     

Metabolomics of biomarker discovery in ovarian cancer: a systematic review of the current literature

Introduction

Metabolomics is the emerging member of “omics” sciences advancing the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of many cancers, including ovarian cancer (OC).

Objectives

To systematically identify the metabolomic abnormalities in OC detection, and the dominant metabolic pathways associated with the observed alterations.

Methods

An electronic literature search was performed, up to and including January 15th 2016, for studies evaluating the metabolomic profile of patients with OC compared to controls. QUADOMICS tool was used to assess the quality of the twenty-three studies included in this systematic review.

Results

Biological samples utilized for metabolomic analysis include: serum/plasma (n = 13), urine (n = 4), cyst fluid (n = 3), tissue (n = 2) and ascitic fluid (n = 1). Metabolites related to cellular respiration, carbohydrate, lipid, protein and nucleotide metabolism were significantly altered in OC. Increased levels of tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates and altered metabolites of the glycolytic pathway pointed to perturbations in cellular respiration. Alterations in lipid metabolism included enhanced fatty acid oxidation, abnormal levels of glycerolipids, sphingolipids and free fatty acids with common elevations of palmitate, oleate, and myristate. Increased levels of glutamine, glycine, cysteine and threonine were commonly reported while enhanced degradations of tryptophan, histidine and phenylalanine were found. N-acetylaspartate, a brain amino acid, was found elevated in primary and metastatic OC tissue and ovarian cyst fluid. Further, elevated levels of ketone bodies including 3-hydroxybutyrate were commonly reported. Increased levels of nucleotide metabolites and tocopherols were consistent through out the studies.

Conclusion

Metabolomics presents significant new opportunities for diagnostic biomarker development, elucidating previously unknown mechanisms of OC pathogenesis.

     

MTHFR polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) have been reported to alter the risk of ovarian cancer. However, the results are still inconclusive. For better understanding of the effect of these two polymorphisms on ovarian cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. An extensive search was performed to identify all case–control studies investigating such association. The strength of association between these two polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk was assessed by odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95?% confidence interval (95?% CI). 3,496 cases and 3,631 controls for C677T polymorphism and 3,280 cases and 3,346 controls for A1298C polymorphism were included in this meta-analysis. The results suggested that there were no significant associations between C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and ovarian cancer risk in overall comparisons in all genetic models (For C677T: TT vs. CC: OR?=?0.94, 95?% CI?=?0.71–1.24, P?=?0.65; CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.03, 95?% CI?=?0.93–1.14, P?=?0.57; TT/CT vs. CC: OR?=?1.01, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.16, P?=?0.87; TT vs. CC/CT: OR?=?0.93, 95?% CI?=?0.72–1.20, P?=?0.58. For A1298C: CC vs. AA: OR?=?1.05, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.25, P?=?0.65; CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.98, 95?% CI?=?0.88–1.08, P?=?0.66; CC/CA vs. AA: OR?=?0.99, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.09, P?=?0.85; CC vs. AA/CA: OR?=?1.06, 95?% CI?=?0.90–1.26, P?=?0.46). Subgroup analysis based on ethnicities and influence analysis did not perturb the results. In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are not associated with ovarian cancer risk, especially in Caucasians.     

Clinical and pathological characteristics of occult breast cancer and review of the literature

Purpose: Occult breast cancer is defined as axillary metastasis without clinically and/or radiologically evident primary tumor. In female patients presenting with isolated axillary nodes with adenocarcinoma, the most likely primary cancer is an invasive breast carcinoma. Herein we present our experience over this issue, together with a brief review of the literature about this clinically challenging condition. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1215 consecutive breast cancer patients treated at our clinic between 2004- 2010. Four of these patients presented with axillary nodal metastasis without clinical and radiological evidence of a primary breast tumor. Results: The incidence of occult breast cancer in our clinic was 0.32%. Median follow-up was 8 months. All patients were alive and remained free of disease at the end of the follow-up period. Conclusion: The prognostic factors for occult breast carcinoma are similar to that of its overt counterpart. The number of axillary lymph node involved and the hormone receptor status are considered significant prognostic predictors. Further studies with randomization and longer followup are needed for the establishment of a safe management plan.     

Psychological adjustment of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature

Objective  

Prostate cancer (PCA) is the most common malignancy and a major cause of death in men but, importantly, a substantial proportion will live for several years following diagnosis. However, they face the prospect of experiencing symptoms, side-effects of treatment and diminished quality of life. The patient's psychological adjustment is particularly complex, given the potential trajectory of the disease, from the point of diagnosis, with its immediate impact, to the phase of palliative care, with its attendant issue of facing mortality. Since a comprehensive review of the literature on psychological adjustment of men with PCA has not yet been done, we have documented relevant research, integrated findings and drawn conclusions, where possible, in order to map out clinical and research implications.     

Evaluating genetic association among ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer: evidence for a breast/ovarian cancer relationship

The possibility of a genetic relationship between ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer was investigated in data from a large multicenter, population-based, case-control study, the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Age-adjusted relative risks (RRs) for mothers and sisters of 493 ovarian cancer cases, 895 breast cancer cases, and 143 endometrial cancer cases versus 4,754 controls were calculated. Significantly elevated age-adjusted RRs were found for ovarian cancer (RR = 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6-4.9) and breast cancer (RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.1-2.1) among relatives of ovarian cancer probands and for breast cancer (RR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.7-2.5) and ovarian cancer (RR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.0-2.0) among relatives of breast cancer probands. Relatives of endometrial cancer probands had an elevated RR for endometrial cancer only (RR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.6-4.8). The genetic relationship between ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer was tested using a multivariate polygenic threshold model developed by Smith (1976), which was modified to accommodate three classes of probands. Estimates of heritability for ovarian, breast, and endometrial cancer were 40%, 56%, and 52%, respectively. There was a significant genetic correlation between ovarian and breast cancer (R12 = .484). Evidence for significant genetic overlap between endometrial cancer and either ovarian or breast cancer was not found. These results suggest the existence of a familial breast/ovarian cancer syndrome. Endometrial cancer, while heritable, appears to be genetically unrelated.     

Genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors to pancreatic cancer: A review of the literature

Some cases of pancreatic cancer (PC) are described to cluster within families. With the exception of PALLD gene mutations, which explain only a very modest fraction of familial cases, the genetic basis of familial PC is still obscure. Here the literature was reviewed in order to list the known genes, environmental factors, and health conditions associated with PC or involved in the carcinogenesis of the pancreas. Most of the genes listed are responsible for various well-defined cancer syndromes, such as CDKN2A (familial atypical mole-multiple melanoma, FAMMM), the mismatch repair genes (Lynch Syndrome), TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome), APC (familial adenomatous polyposis), and BRCA2 (breast–ovarian familial cancer), where PC is part of the cancer spectrum of the disease. In addition, in this review I ranked known/possible risk factors extending the analysis to the hereditary pancreatitis (HP), diabetes, or to specific environmental exposures such as smoking. It appears that these factors contribute strongly to only a small proportion of PC cases. Recent work has revealed new genes somatically mutated in PC, including alterations within the pathways of Wnt/Notch and DNA mismatch repair. These new insights will help to reveal new candidate genes for the susceptibility to this disease and to better ascertain the actual contribution of the familial forms.     

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older women with early breast cancer - a systematic review of literature

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is an analytical tool increasingly implemented in clinical practice. Breast cancer is primarily a disease of older people; however, most evidence-based research is aimed at younger patients. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was carried out to assess the use of CGA in older breast cancer patients for clinical decision making. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched. RESULTS: A total of nine useful full text article results were found. Only five of these were exclusively concerned with early breast cancer; thus, studies involving a variety of cancer types, stages and treatments were accepted, as long as they included early breast cancer. The results comprised a series of low sources of evidence. However, all results shared a common theme: the CGA has a use in determining patient suitability for different types of cancer treatment and subsequently maximizing the patient's quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: There is not yet sufficient high level evidence to instate CGA guidelines as a mandatory practice in the management of breast cancer, due to the heterogeneity of available studies. More studies need to be conducted to cement current work on the benefits of the CGA. An area of particular interest is with regard to treatment options, especially surgery and chemotherapy, and identifying patients who may be suitable for these treatments.     

Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration as a presentation of breast cancer – a case report and review of the literature

Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration is part of a rare spectrum of neurological syndromes whereby gynaecological, lung or breast cancers present primarily with neurological manifestations. The presence of onconeural antibodies and PET scanning help in the challenging diagnosis of these conditions but despite the treatment of the primary cancer, the prognosis for the neurological symptoms is poor.     

Loss of ovarian function and the risk of ovarian cancer

Animal models with premature ovarian failure resulting from the loss or depletion of germ cells consistently develop ovarian surface epithelial cell hyperplasia with invasion into the stroma and the development of ovarian tubular adenomas. In human ovaries, deep epithelial invaginations and inclusion cysts occur at increasing frequency with age and are thought to be the structures from which the majority of ovarian cancers arise. A feature that is common to these animal models and to post-menopausal women is a deficiency in the number of oocytes. The potential consequences of the loss or depletion of female germ cells, naturally or otherwise, include failure of follicle development, significant reductions in oestrogen and progesterone levels and elevation of circulating levels of gonadotropins. This review will consider the way in which these structural and hormonal changes affect ovarian cancer risk. Some lessons may be learned from gonad formation, since notable similarities exist between ovarian tumorigenesis and embryonic gonadogenesis including fragmentation of the basement membrane underlying the coelomic (surface) epithelium, the potential for the migration of epithelial cells into the gonad and the importance of the germ cells for the regulation of ovarian structure and function. Research was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.     

Antidepressants, eicosanoids and the prevention and treatment of cancer. A review

Among the mechanisms of carcinogenesis are oncogene synthesis and expression, upregulation of cyclooxygenase, accelerated cell replication, failed apoptosis, viral activation, disruption of signaling pathways, autoimmunity, immunosuppression, angiogenesis and metastasis. All fall within the orbit of eicosanoids and the enzymes that synthesize them. Antidepressants may be of benefit in the prevention and treatment of cancer, as they inhibit the synthesis, antagonize the actions and accelerate the degradation of such eicosanoids as prostaglandins and thromboxanes.