Identification and characterization of a potent, selective, and orally active antagonist of the CC chemokine receptor-1

The CC chemokine receptor-1 (CCR1) is a prime therapeutic target for treating autoimmune diseases. Through high capacity screening followed by chemical optimization, we identified a novel non-peptide CCR1 antagonist, R-N-[5-chloro-2-[2-[4-[(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-2-methyl-1-piperazinyl ]-2-oxoethoxy]phenyl]urea hydrochloric acid salt (BX 471). Competition binding studies revealed that BX 471 was able to displace the CCR1 ligands macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha), RANTES, and monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3) with high affinity (K(i) ranged from 1 nm to 5.5 nm). BX 471 was a potent functional antagonist based on its ability to inhibit a number of CCR1-mediated effects including Ca(2+) mobilization, increase in extracellular acidification rate, CD11b expression, and leukocyte migration. BX 471 demonstrated a greater than 10,000-fold selectivity for CCR1 compared with 28 G-protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that BX 471 was orally active with a bioavailability of 60% in dogs. Furthermore, BX 471 effectively reduces disease in a rat experimental allergic encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis. This study is the first to demonstrate that a non-peptide chemokine receptor antagonist is efficacious in an animal model of an autoimmune disease. In summary, we have identified a potent, selective, and orally available CCR1 antagonist that may be useful in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases.     

Met-RANTES reduces vascular and tubular damage during acute renal transplant rejection: blocking monocyte arrest and recruitment.

Chemokines are thought to contribute to the cellular infiltrate characteristic of renal transplant rejection. We show that Met-RANTES, a chemokine receptor antagonist, suppresses recruitment of inflammatory cells into renal allografts. In a renal transplant model (Fisher RT1(lvl) rat kidney into Lewis RT1(l) rat) where no additional immune suppressant was used, Met-RANTES-treated animals showed a significant reduction in vascular injury score (16.10 +/- 5.20 vs. 62.67 +/- 18.64) and tubular damage score (15.70 +/- 5.22 vs. 33.00 +/- 6.44) relative to untreated animals. In a more severe rejection model (Brown-Norway RT1(n) rat kidney into Lewis RT1(1) rat), Met-RANTES significantly augmented low-dose cyclosporin A treatment to reduce all aspects of renal injury including interstitial inflammation (score 71.00 +/- 6.10 vs. 157.30 +/- 21.30). The majority of infiltrating cells in these models (60-70%) consisted of monocytes. Potential mechanisms of action of Met-RANTES were tested using monocyte attachment assays on microvascular endothelium under physiological flow conditions. Preexposure of microvascular endothelium to RANTES resulted in RANTES immobilization and RANTES-induced firm adhesion of monocytes only after prestimulation of the endothelium with IL-1beta. Met-RANTES completely inhibited this RANTES-mediated arrest. Thus, Met-RANTES may counter acute rejection by blocking leukocyte firm adhesion to inflamed endothelium.     

Treatment with BX471, a CC chemokine receptor 1 antagonist, attenuates systemic inflammatory response during sepsis

Sepsis is a complex clinical syndrome resulting from a harmful host inflammatory response to infection. Chemokines and their receptors play a key role in the pathogenesis of sepsis. BX471 is a potent nonpeptide CC chemokine receptor-1 (CCR1) antagonist in both human and mouse. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of prophylactic and therapeutic treatment with BX471 on cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis in the mouse and to investigate the underlying mechanisms. In sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture, treatment with BX471 significantly protected mice against lung and liver injury by attenuating MPO activity, an indicator of neutrophil recruitment in lungs and livers and attenuating lung and liver morphological changes in histological sections. Blocking CCR1 by BX471 also downregulated ICAM-1, P-selectin, and E-selectin expression at mRNA and protein levels in lungs and livers compared with placebo-treated groups. These findings suggest that blockage of CCR1 by specific antagonist may represent a promising strategy to prevent disease progression in sepsis.     

Chemokine-Induced secretion of gelatinase B in primary human monocytes.

Chemokines help control normal leukocyte trafficking as well as their infiltration into tissues during acute and chronic inflammation. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) help support the extravasation and infiltration of leukocytes through limited proteolysis of basement membranes and matrix material. The effect of the chemokines RANTES/CCL5, MCP-1/CCL and SDF-1/CXCL12 on secretion of the matrix metalloproteinase B and its endogenous inhibitor TIMP-1 was studied. RANTES/CCL5 and SDF-1/CXCL12 were found to induce MMP-9 secretion in primary human monocytes while TIMP-1 secretion was not affected. RANTES/CCL5 effects were mediated through CCR1 because the CCR1 antagonist BX471 was found to effectively block RANTES/CCL5-induced MMP-9 secretion.     

Chemokines and chemokine receptors in renal transplantation--from bench to bedside

Attraction of mononuclear cells to sites of inflammation requires a close interplay of the inflammatory signal presented via chemokines and specific receptors on effector cells. First studies on acute renal transplant rejection demonstrated the involvement of CC-chemokines, such as RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta and MCP-1, as well as CXC-chemokines such as IL-8 and IP-10, correlating with expression of the corresponding chemokine receptors, CCR1, CCR5 and CCR2 as well as CXCR3. Since then, the pathophysiologic relevance has been extended to chronic allograft nephropathy and transplant glomerulopathy. Chemokine expression can be triggered by different stimuli, e.g. brain death, ischemia, HLA-mismatch and infection. Furthermore, anti-inflammatory chemokines have been identified. Chemokine receptor 7, e.g. enhances homing of lymphocytes to lymphatic tissues and the Duffy antigen receptor, DARC, a non-specific receptor that binds and inactivates different chemokines. While measurement of chemokine expression in clinical transplantation may facilitate the differential diagnosis of allograft dysfunction, knowledge of the chemokine network has also widened the understanding of transplant rejection and opened novel therapeutic approaches. Observations from humans with mutations of the chemokine network as well as transplantation of animals with targeted deletions in this system suggest that manipulations of chemokine signalling may improve the success rates of transplantation. Blocking chemokines unselectively with Met-RANTES or specifically with small molecule inhibitors of various chemokine receptors has lead to improved outcome in animal models. Currently, first human trials are under way to investigate drugs that stimulate lymphocyte homing. Inhibitors of CCR1 and CCR5 are being tested for other human diseases and may eventually be available in transplantation. Nonetheless, chemokine blockade my rather serve as an adjunct in the management of transplant recipients than a new "magic bullet".     

Structure function differences in nonpeptide CCR1 antagonists for human and mouse CCR1

A useful strategy for identifying ligand binding domains of G protein-coupled receptors has been the exploitation of species differences in antagonist potencies. We have used this approach for the CCR1 chemokine receptor with a novel series of antagonists, the 4-hydroxypiperidines, which were discovered by high throughput screening of human CCR1 and subsequently optimized. The structure-activity relationships for a number of different 4-hydroxypiperidine antagonists for human and mouse CCR1 were examined by receptor binding and functional assays. These compounds exhibit major differences in their rank order of potency for the human and mouse chemokine receptor CCR1. For example, the initial lead template, BX 510, which was a highly potent functional antagonist for human CCR1 (K(i) = 21 nM) was >400-fold less active on mouse CCR1 (K(i) = 9150 nM). However, increasing the length of the linker between the piperidine and dibenzothiepine groups by one methylene group generated a compound, BX 511, which was equipotent for both human and mouse CCR1. These and other analogs of the lead template BX 510, which have major differences in potency for human and mouse CCR1, are described, and a model for their interaction with human CCR1 is presented.     

Predictions of CCR1 chemokine receptor structure and BX 471 antagonist binding followed by experimental validation

A major challenge in the application of structure-based drug design methods to proteins belonging to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the paucity of structural information (1). The 19 chemokine receptors, belonging to the Class A family of GPCRs, are important drug targets not only for autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis but also for the blockade of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 entry (2). Using the MembStruk computational method (3), we predicted the three-dimensional structure of the human CCR1 receptor. In addition, we predicted the binding site of the small molecule CCR1 antagonist BX 471, which is currently in Phase II clinical trials (4). Based on the predicted antagonist binding site we designed 17 point mutants of CCR1 to validate the predictions. Subsequent competitive ligand binding and chemotaxis experiments with these mutants gave an excellent correlation to these predictions. In particular, we find that Tyr-113 and Tyr-114 on transmembrane domain 3 and Ile-259 on transmembrane 6 contribute significantly to the binding of BX 471. Finally, we used the predicted and validated structure of CCR1 in a virtual screening validation of the Maybridge data base, seeded with selective CCR1 antagonists. The screen identified 63% of CCR1 antagonists in the top 5% of the hits. Our results indicate that rational drug design for GPCR targets is a feasible approach.     

The role of the CC chemokine, RANTES, in acute lung allograft rejection

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for patients with end-stage lung disease. Acute allograft rejection is a major complication of lung transplantation and is characterized by the infiltration of activated mononuclear cells. The specific mechanisms that recruit these leukocytes have not been fully elucidated. The CC chemokine, RANTES, is a potent mononuclear cell chemoattractant. In this study we investigated RANTES involvement during acute lung allograft rejection in humans and in a rat model system. Patients with allograft rejection had a 2.3-fold increase in RANTES in their bronchoalveolar lavages compared with healthy allograft recipients. Rat lung allografts demonstrated a marked time-dependent increase in levels of RANTES compared with syngeneic control lungs. RANTES levels correlated with the temporal recruitment of mononuclear cells and the expression of RANTES receptors CCR1 and CCR5. To determine RANTES involvement in lung allograft rejection, lung allograft recipients were passively immunized with either anti-RANTES or control Abs. In vivo neutralization of RANTES attenuated acute lung allograft rejection and reduced allospecific responsiveness by markedly decreasing mononuclear cell recruitment. These experiments support the idea that RANTES, and the expression of its receptors have an important role in the pathogenesis of acute lung allograft rejection.     

Why CCR2 and CCR5 blockade failed and why CCR1 blockade might still be effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Background

The aim of this study was to provide more insight into the question as to why blockade of CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 may have failed in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, using an in vitro monocyte migration system model.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Monocytes from healthy donors (HD; n = 8) or from RA patients (for CCR2 and CCR5 antibody n = 8; for CCR1 blockade n = 13) were isolated from peripheral blood and pre-incubated with different concentrations of either anti-CCR1, anti-CCR2, or anti-CCR5 blocking antibodies (or medium or isotype controls). In addition, a small molecule CCR1 antagonist (BX471) was tested. Chemotaxis was induced by CCL2/MCP-1 (CCR2 ligand), CCL5/RANTES (CCR1 and CCR5 ligand), or by a mix of 5 RA synovial fluids (SFs), and cellular responses compared to chemotaxis in the presence of medium alone. Anti-CCR2 antibody treatment blocked CCL2/MCP-1-induced chemotaxis of both HD and RA monocytes compared to isotype control. Similarly, anti-CCR5 antibody treatment blocked CCL5/RANTES-induced chemotaxis of RA monocytes. While neither CCR2 nor CCR5 blocking antibodies were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis, even when both receptors were blocked simultaneously, both anti-CCR1 antibodies and the CCR1 antagonist were able to inhibit SF-induced monocyte chemotaxis.

Conclusions/Significance

The RA synovial compartment contains several ligands for CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 as well as other chemokines and receptors involved in monocyte recruitment to the site of inflammation. The results suggest that CCR2 and CCR5 are not critical for the migration of monocytes towards the synovial compartment in RA. In contrast, blockade of CCR1 may be effective. Conceivably, CCR1 blockade failed in clinical trials, not because CCR1 is not a good target, but because very high levels of receptor occupancy at all times may be needed to inhibit monocyte migration in vivo.     

Angiotensin II-induced mononuclear leukocyte interactions with arteriolar and venular endothelium are mediated by the release of different CC chemokines

Angiotensin II (Ang-II) is associated with atherogenesis and arterial subendothelial mononuclear leukocyte infiltration. We have demonstrated that Ang-II causes the initial attachment of mononuclear cells to the arteriolar endothelium. We now report on the contribution of CC chemokines to this response. Intraperitoneal administration of 1 nM Ang-II induced MCP-1, RANTES, and MIP-1alpha generation, maximal at 4 h, followed by mononuclear leukocyte recruitment at 8 and 24 h. Using intravital microscopy within the rat mesenteric microcirculation 4 h after exposure to 1 nM Ang-II, arteriolar mononuclear cell adhesion was 80-90% inhibited by pretreatment with Met-RANTES, a CCR1 and CCR5 antagonist, or an anti-MCP-1 antiserum, without affecting the increased endothelial expression of P-selectin and VCAM-1. Conversely, leukocyte interactions with the venular endothelium, although inhibited by Met-RANTES, were little affected by the anti-MCP-1. Using rat whole blood in vitro, Ang-II (100 nM) induced the expression of monocyte CD11b that was inhibited by Met-RANTES but not by anti-MCP-1. Stimulation of human endothelial cells (human umbilical arterial endothelial cells and HUVECs) with 1-1000 nM Ang-II, predominantly acting at its AT(1) receptor, induced the release of MCP-1 within 1 h, RANTES within 4 h, and MCP-3 within 24 h. Eotaxin-3, a natural CCR2 antagonist, was released within 1 h and may delay mononuclear cell responses to MCP-1. Therefore, Ang-II-induced mononuclear leukocyte recruitment at arterioles and venules is mediated by the production of different CC chemokines. Thus, Ang-II may be a key molecule in the initial attachment of mononuclear cells to the arterial endothelium in cardiovascular disease states where this event is a characteristic feature.     

Molecular anatomy of CCR5 engagement by physiologic and viral chemokines and HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins: differences in primary structural requirements for RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and vMIP-II Binding.

Molecular analysis of CCR5, the cardinal coreceptor for HIV-1 infection, has implicated the N-terminal extracellular domain (N-ter) and regions vicinal to the second extracellular loop (ECL2) in this activity. It was shown that residues in the N-ter are necessary for binding of the physiologic ligands, RANTES (CCL5) and MIP-1 alpha (CCL3). vMIP-II, encoded by the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, is a high affinity CCR5 antagonist, but lacks efficacy as a coreceptor inhibitor. Therefore, we compared the mechanism for engagement by vMIP-II of CCR5 to its interaction with physiologic ligands. RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and vMIP-II bound CCR5 at high affinity, but demonstrated partial cross-competition. Characterization of 15 CCR5 alanine scanning mutants of charged extracellular amino acids revealed that alteration of acidic residues in the distal N-ter abrogated binding of RANTES, MIP-1 alpha, and vMIP-II. Whereas mutation of residues in ECL2 of CCR5 dramatically reduced the binding of RANTES and MIP-1 alpha and their ability to induce signaling, interaction with vMIP-II was not altered by any mutation in the exoloops of the receptor. Paradoxically, monoclonal antibodies to N-ter epitopes did not block chemokine binding, but those mapped to ECL2 were effective inhibitors. A CCR5 chimera with the distal N-ter residues of CXCR2 bound MIP-1 alpha and vMIP-II with an affinity similar to that of the wild-type receptor. Engagement of CCR5 by vMIP-II, but not RANTES or MIP-1 alpha blocked the binding of monoclonal antibodies to the receptor, providing additional evidence for a distinct mechanism for viral chemokine binding. Analysis of the coreceptor activity of randomly generated mouse-human CCR5 chimeras implicated residues in ECL2 between H173 and V197 in this function. RANTES, but not vMIP-II blocked CCR5 M-tropic coreceptor activity in the fusion assay. The insensitivity of vMIP-II binding to mutations in ECL2 provides a potential rationale to its inefficiency as an antagonist of CCR5 coreceptor activity. These findings suggest that the molecular anatomy of CCR5 binding plays a critical role in antagonism of coreceptor activity.     

The chemokine RANTES is a crucial mediator of the progression from acute to chronic colitis in the rat

Chemokines have well characterized proinflammatory actions, including the ability to induce extravasation of leukocytes that participate in chronic inflammation. In this study, we evaluated the role of a C-C chemokine, RANTES, in the chronic phase of a rat model of colitis. Colitis was induced by intracolonic administration of trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid. At various timepoints thereafter (2 h to 14 days), colonic tissue levels of several chemokines were measured. Unlike the expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant, the expression of RANTES was significantly elevated during the chronic phase of colitis (> or =7 days after induction). Colonic RANTES mRNA expression was also significantly elevated during the chronic phase of colitis. The numbers of macrophages and monocytes in the colonic mucosa increased substantially during the chronic phase, as did expression of two of the receptors (CCR1 and CCR5) to which RANTES is known to bind. Administration on days 7 through 14 after trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid administration of a CCR1/CCR5 receptor antagonist, Met-RANTES, resulted in a significant reduction of both macroscopic and microscopic colonic damage, as well as reducing the recruitment into the colon of monocytes, mast cells, and neutrophils. In some rats, treatment with Met-RANTES resulted in a near-complete resolution of colonic damage and inflammation. These results suggest a crucial role of RANTES in the progression from acute to chronic inflammation in a rat model of colitis.     

CCR5 deficiency aggravates crescentic glomerulonephritis in mice

The chemokine receptor CCR5 is predominantly expressed on monocytes and Th1-polarized T cells, and plays an important role in T cell and monocyte recruitment in inflammatory diseases. To investigate the functional role of CCR5 in renal inflammation, we induced a T cell-dependent model of glomerulonephritis (nephrotoxic serum nephritis) in CCR5(-/-) mice. Induction of nephritis in wild-type mice resulted in up-regulation of renal mRNA expression of the three CCR5 chemokine ligands, CCL5 (15-fold), CCL3 (4.9-fold), and CCL4 (3.4-fold), in the autologous phase of the disease at day 10. The up-regulated chemokine expression was paralleled by infiltration of monocytes and T cells, followed by renal tissue injury, albuminuria, and loss of renal function. Nephritic CCR5(-/-) mice showed a 3- to 4-fold increased renal expression of CCL5 (61.6-fold vs controls) and CCL3 (14.1-fold vs controls), but not of CCL4, in comparison with nephritic wild-type mice, which was accompanied by augmented renal T cell and monocyte recruitment and increased lethality due to uremia. Furthermore, CCR5(-/-) mice showed an increased renal Th1 response, whereas their systemic humoral and cellular immune responses were unaltered. Because the CCR5 ligands CCL5 and CCL3 also act via CCR1, we investigated the effects of the pharmacological CCR1 antagonist BX471. CCR1 blockade in CCR5(-/-) mice significantly reduced renal chemokine expression, T cell infiltration, and glomerular crescent formation, indicating that increased renal leukocyte recruitment and consecutive tissue damage in nephritic CCR5(-/-) mice depended on functional CCR1. In conclusion, this study shows that CCR5 deficiency aggravates glomerulonephritis via enhanced CCL3/CCL5-CCR1-driven renal T cell recruitment.     

Selection of CC chemokine receptor 5-binding peptide from a phage display peptide library

Human CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 5 is a G protein-coupled receptor involved in a broad range of human diseases that mediates HIV-1 viral entry into cells. Certain small molecule receptor antagonists to CCR5 have been useful in therapy for these diseases. In this study, CCR5-expressing CHO cells (CHO/CCR5 cells) were used to select CCR5-binding peptides from a phage-displayed 12-mers peptide library. All of the 30 clones selected from the library showed specific binding to CHO/CCR5 cells by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Seventeen out of the 30 clones shared the amino acid motif AFDWTFVPSLIL. The motif-containing phages and synthetic peptide AFDWTFVPSLIL blocked the binding of mAb 2D7 to CHO/CCR5 cells and competitively inhibited the ability of chemokine regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) binding to CHO/CCR5 cells. Furthermore, the peptide AFDWTFVPSLIL also inhibited RANTES induced increase in the intracellular Ca2+ level in CHO/CCR5 cells. These results suggest that the peptide AFDWTFVPSLIL was specific for CCR5 and that it might become a CCR5 antagonist.     

Differential role of CCR2 in islet and heart allograft rejection: tissue specificity of chemokine/chemokine receptor function in vivo

Chemokines have a pivotal role in the mobilization and activation of specific leukocyte subsets in acute allograft rejection. However, the role of specific chemokines and chemokine receptors in islet allograft rejection has not been fully elucidated. We now show that islet allograft rejection is associated with a steady increase in intragraft expression of the chemokines CCL8 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-2), CCL9 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-5), CCL5 (RANTES), CXCL-10 (IFN-gamma-inducible protein-10), and CXCL9 (monokine induced by IFN-gamma) and their corresponding chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, CCR1, and CXCR3. Because CCR2 was found to be highly induced, we tested the specific role of CCR2 in islet allograft rejection by transplanting fully MHC mismatched islets from BALB/c mice into C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) and CCR2-deficient mice (CCR2-/-). A significant prolongation of islet allograft survival was noted in CCR2-/- recipients, with median survival time of 24 and 12 days for CCR2-/- and WT recipients, respectively (p < 0.0001). This was associated with reduction in the generation of CD8+, but not CD4+ effector alloreactive T cells (CD62L(low)CD44(high)) in CCR2-/- compared with WT recipients. In addition, CCR2-/- recipients had a reduced Th1 and increased Th2 alloresponse in the periphery (by ELISPOT analysis) as well as in the grafts (by RT-PCR). However, these changes were only transient in CCR2-/- recipients that ultimately rejected their grafts. Furthermore, in contrast to the islet transplants, CCR2 deficiency offered only marginal prolongation of heart allograft survival. This study demonstrates the important role for CCR2 in early islet allograft rejection and highlights the tissue specificity of the chemokine/chemokine receptor system in vivo in regulating allograft rejection.     

Study of the role of CCR5 in a mouse model of intranasal challenge with Yersinia pestis

CCR5 is a chemokine receptor used by HIV-1 to enter cells and has recently been found to act as a pathogen associated molecule pattern receptor. Current positive selection for the high frequency of a CCR5-Delta32 allele in humans has been attributed to resistance to HIV, smallpox, and plague infections. Using an intranasal mouse model of Y. pestis infection, we have found that lack of CCR5 does not enhance host resistance to Y. pestis infection and that CCR5-mediated responses might have a protective role. CCR5-/- mice exhibited higher levels of circulating RANTES and MIP-1alpha than those exhibited by wild-type mice at the baseline and throughout the course of Y. pestis infection. High levels of RANTES and MIP-1alpha, which are CCR5 ligands that mediate Natural Killer cell migration, may reflect compensation for the absence of CCR5 signaling.     

Intracellular Signaling by the Chemokine Receptor US28 during Human Cytomegalovirus Infection

In patients with impaired cell-mediated immune responses (e.g., lung transplant recipients and AIDS patients), cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes severe disease such as pneumonitis. However, although immunocompetency in the host can protect from CMV disease, the virus persists by evading the host immune defenses. A model of CMV infection of the endothelium has been developed in which inflammatory stimuli, such as the CC chemokine RANTES, bind to the endothelial cell surface, stimulating calcium flux during late times of CMV infection. At 96 h postinfection, CMV-infected cells express mRNA of the CMV-encoded CC chemokine receptor US28 but do not express mRNA of other CC chemokine receptors that bind RANTES (CCR1, CCR4, CCR5). Cloning and stable expression of the receptor CMV US28 in human kidney epithelial cells (293 cells) with and without the heterotrimeric G protein α₁₆ indicated that CMV US28 couples to both Gα_i and Gα₁₆ proteins to activate calcium flux in response to the chemokines RANTES and MCP-3. Furthermore, cells that coexpress US28 and Gα₁₆ responded to RANTES stimulation with activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, which could be attributed, in part, to specific Gα₁₆ coupling. Thus, through expression of the CC chemokine receptor US28, CMV may utilize resident G proteins of the infected cell to manipulate cellular responses stimulated by chemokines.     

C-C chemokine receptor 3 antagonism by the beta-chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein 4, a property strongly enhanced by an amino-terminal alanine-methionine swap

Allergic reactions are characterized by the infiltration of tissues by activated eosinophils, Th2 lymphocytes, and basophils. The beta-chemokine receptor CCR3, which recognizes the ligands eotaxin, eotaxin-2, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP) 3, MCP4, and RANTES, plays a central role in this process, and antagonists to this receptor could have potential therapeutic use in the treatment of allergy. We describe here a potent and specific CCR3 antagonist, called Met-chemokine beta 7 (Ckbeta7), that prevents signaling through this receptor and, at concentrations as low as 1 nM, can block eosinophil chemotaxis induced by the most potent CCR3 ligands. Met-Ckbeta7 is a more potent CCR3 antagonist than Met- and aminooxypentane (AOP)-RANTES and, unlike these proteins, exhibits no partial agonist activity and is highly specific for CCR3. Thus, this antagonist may be of use in ameliorating leukocyte infiltration associated with allergic inflammation. Met-Ckbeta7 is a modified form of the beta-chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP) 4 (alternatively called pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokine (PARC), alternative macrophage activation-associated C-C chemokine (AMAC) 1, or dendritic cell-derived C-C chemokine (DCCK) 1). Surprisingly, the unmodified MIP4 protein, which is known to act as a T cell chemoattractant, also exhibits this CCR3 antagonistic activity, although to a lesser extent than Met-Ckbeta7, but to a level that may be of physiological relevance. MIP4 may therefore use chemokine receptor agonism and antagonism to control leukocyte movement in vivo. The enhanced activity of Met-Ckbeta7 is due to the alteration of the extreme N-terminal residue from an alanine to a methionine.     

Effects of blocking chemokine receptor CCR1 with BX471 in two models of fibrosis prevention and rescue in mice

BackgroundThe induction, progression and resolution of liver fibrosis are influenced by multiple chemokines. The inhibition of CCR1 signalling by a specific non-peptide inhibitor (BX471) reduces kidney fibrosis after unilateral ureteral obstruction via suppression of leukocyte recruitment in mice. However, it remains unclear whether selective CCR1 inhibition also affects hepatic fibrogenesis. Therefore we aimed to study the effect of this intervention on liver fibrosis in prevention (CCl₄ administration) and rescue (ABCB4-deficient mice) mouse models.MethodsIn the prevention model, hepatic fibrosis was induced by repeated injections of CCl₄. Additionally, the verum group was treated with subcutaneous injections of BX471, while controls received vehicle only. ABCB4 deficient mice (on the BALB/c-background) with sclerosing cholangitis and biliary fibrosis received BX471 or vehicle, respectively (rescue model). Liver histopathology was assessed after Sirius red staining of collagen, and hepatic collagen contents were measured. In addition, we performed gene expression analyses of fibrosis-related genes.ResultsBX471 injections were tolerated moderately well by all mice, and all mice developed hepatic fibrosis. Significant differences were neither observed in serum aminotransferase activities after 6 weeks of treatment between the two groups in the prevention nor in the rescue model. Interestingly, hepatic collagen contents were significantly higher in mice treated with BX471 in the prevention model as compared to controls but histological stages of liver sections did not differ. Of note, we observed only moderate effects on liver fibrosis in the ABCB4 knock-out model.ConclusionsOur data indicate that BX471 treatment did neither affect serum and tissue markers of liver injury and fibrosis in the CCl₄ model and only moderately in the Abcb4^-/- model of biliary fibrosis. The animal models indicate that treatment with BX471 alone is unlikely to exert major beneficial effects in chronic liver disease.