Palindrome-mediated chromosomal translocations in humans

Recently, it has emerged that palindrome-mediated genomic instability contributes to a diverse group of genomic rearrangements including translocations, deletions, and amplifications. One of the best studied examples is the recurrent t(11;22) constitutional translocation in humans that has been well documented to be mediated by palindromic AT-rich repeats (PATRRs) on chromosomes 11q23 and 22q11. De novo examples of the translocation are detected at a high frequency in sperm samples from normal healthy males, but not in lymphoblasts or fibroblasts. Cloned breakpoint sequences preferentially form a cruciform configuration in vitro. Analysis of the junction fragments implicates frequent double-strand-breaks (DSBs) at the center of both palindromic regions, followed by repair through the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway. We propose that the PATRR adopts a cruciform structure in male meiotic cells, creating genomic instability that leads to the recurrent translocation.     

Chromatin structural elements and chromosomal translocations in leukemia

Recurring chromosome abnormalities are strongly associated with certain subtypes of leukemia, lymphoma and sarcomas. More recently, their potential involvement in carcinomas, i.e. prostate cancer, has been recognized. They are among the most important factors in determining disease prognosis, and in many cases, identification of these chromosome abnormalities is crucial in selecting appropriate treatment protocols. Chromosome translocations are frequently observed in both de novo and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The mechanisms that result in such chromosome translocations in leukemia and other cancers are largely unknown. Genomic breakpoints in all the common chromosome translocations in leukemia, including t(4;11), t(9;11), t(8;21), inv(16), t(15;17), t(12;21), t(1;19) and t(9;22), have been cloned. Genomic breakpoints tend to cluster in certain intronic regions of the relevant genes including MLL, AF4, AF9, AML1, ETO, CBFB, MYHI1, PML, RARA, TEL, E2A, PBX1, BCR and ABL. However, whereas the genomic breakpoints in MLL tend to cluster in the 5' portion of the 8.3 kb breakpoint cluster region (BCR) in de novo and adult patients and in the 3' portion in infant leukemia patients and t-AML patients, those in both the AML1 and ETO genes occur in the same clustered regions in both de novo and t-AML patients. These differences may reflect differences in the mechanisms involved in the formation of the translocations. Specific chromatin structural elements, such as in vivo topoisomerase II (topo II) cleavage sites, DNase I hypersensitive sites and scaffold attachment regions (SARs) have been mapped in the breakpoint regions of the relevant genes. Strong in vivo topo II cleavage sites and DNase I hypersensitive sites often co-localize with each other and also with many of the BCRs in most of these genes, whereas SARs are associated with BCRs in MLL, AF4, AF9, AML1, ETO and ABL, but not in the BCR gene. In addition, the BCRs in MLL, AML1 and ETO have the lowest free energy level for unwinding double strand DNA. Virtually all chromosome translocations in leukemia that have been analyzed to date show no consistent homologous sequences at the breakpoints, whereas a strong non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair signature exists at all of these chromosome translocation breakpoint junctions; this includes small deletions and duplications in each breakpoint, and micro-homologies and non-template insertions at genomic junctions of each chromosome translocation. Surprisingly, the size of these deletions and duplications in the same translocation is much larger in de novo leukemia than in therapy-related leukemia. We propose a non-homologous chromosome recombination model as one of the mechanisms that results in chromosome translocations in leukemia. The topo II cleavage sites at open chromatin regions (DNase I hypersensitive sites), SARs or the regions with low energy level are vulnerable to certain genotoxic or other agents and become the initial breakage sites, which are followed by an excision end joining repair process.     

Segregation of two independent chromosomal translocations in one family

Summary A family with two independent reciprocal translocations t(3;19) and t(16;22) is described. The proband, a 4-week-old male, was phenotypically conspicious with multiple congenital anomalies. Cytogenetic examination revealed a balanced reciprocal translocation (3;19) and a supernumerary small marker chromosome. His mother carried two balanced reciprocal translocations, the one found in the proband and a reciprocal translocation (16;22). The maternal grandmother and a maternal uncle were identified as carriers of a single translocation (16;22). The findings in the family members permitted the identification of the proband's marker chromosome as a derivative chromosome 22 resulting in partial trisomy 16 and 22.     

Potential G-quadruplex formation at breakpoint regions of chromosomal translocations in cancer may explain their fragility

Genetic alterations like point mutations, insertions, deletions, inversions and translocations are frequently found in cancers. Chromosomal translocations are one of the most common genomic aberrations associated with nearly all types of cancers especially leukemia and lymphoma. Recent studies have shown the role of non-B DNA structures in generation of translocations. In the present study, using various bioinformatic tools, we show the propensity of formation of different types of altered DNA structures near translocation breakpoint regions. In particular, we find close association between occurrence of G-quadruplex forming motifs and fragile regions in almost 70% of genes involved in rearrangements in lymphoid cancers. However, such an analysis did not provide any evidence for the occurrence of G-quadruplexes at the close vicinity of translocation breakpoint regions in nonlymphoid cancers. Overall, this study will help in the identification of novel non-B DNA targets that may be responsible for generation of chromosomal translocations in cancer.     

A family with two different chromosomal translocations

The proband was a 22-year-old woman who had two spontaneous abortions in the first trimester of pregnancy. She had a consanguineous marriage with no history of malformation or developmental disorders in the family. Her gynecological examination was normal. Chromosome analysis of the family showed two different katyotypes 46,XY,t(1;16)(p22;p13) and 46,XX,t(1;16)(q24;q24) using high-resolution banding (HRB). Proband's family was also examined for chromosome analysis. A t(1;16)(p22;p13) was found in the husband's father and other relatives, and a t(1;16)(q24;q24) translocation in the proband's family. This second tanslocation is not found in her parents.     

AID and Igh switch region-Myc chromosomal translocations

Chromosomal translocations involving Ig heavy chain switch regions and an oncogene, like Myc, represent early initiating events in the development of many B cell malignancies. These translocations are widely believed to result from aberrant class switch recombination (CSR). Recent reports have produced conflicting models for the role of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) in this process. Here, we discuss possible roles of AID, CSR, and somatic hypermutation in generating chromosomal translocations and in tumor progression.     

Topoisomerase II and the etiology of chromosomal translocations

Acute leukemias with balanced chromosomal translocations, protean morphologic and immunophenotypic presentations but generally shorter latency and absence of myelodysplasia are recognized as a complication of anti-cancer drugs that behave as topoisomerase II poisons. Translocations affecting the breakpoint cluster region of the MLL gene at chromosome band 11q23 are the most common molecular genetic aberrations in leukemias associated with the topoisomerase II poisons. These agents perturb the cleavage-religation equilibrium of topoisomerase II and increase cleavage complexes. One model suggests that this damages the DNA directly and leads to chromosomal breakage, which may result in untoward DNA recombination in the form of translocations. This review will summarize the evidence for topoisomerase II involvement in the genesis of translocations and extension of the model to acute leukemia in infants characterized by similar MLL translocations.     

Induction and transmission of wheat-Haynaldia villosa chromosomal translocations

In order to develop more wheat-Haynaldia villosa translocations involving different chromosomes and chromosome segments of H. villosa, T. durum-H, villosa amphiploid was irradiated with ^60Co γ-rays at doses of 800, 1,200, and 1,600 rad. Pollen collected from the spikes 1, 2, and 3 days after irradiation were transferred to emasculated spikes of the common wheat cv. ‘Chinese Spring＇. Genomic in situ hybridization was used to identify wheat-H, villosa chromosome translocations in the M1 generation. Transmission of the identified translocation chromosomes was analyzed in the BC1, BC2, and BC3 generations. The results indicated that all three irradiation doses were highly efficient for inducing wheat-alien translocations without affecting the viability of the M1 seeds. Within the range of 800-1,600 rad, both the efficiency of translocation induction and the frequency of interstitial chromosome breakage-fusion increased as the irradiation dosage increased. A higher translocation induction frequency was observed using pollen collected from the spikes 1 day after irradiation over that of 2 or 3 days after irradiation. More than 70% of the translocations detected in the M1 generation were transmitted to the BC1 through the female gametes. All translocations recovered in the BC1 generation were recovered in the following BC2, and BC3 generations. The transmission ability of different translocation types in different genetic backgrounds showed an order of ‘whole-arm translocation 〉 small alien segment translocation 〉 large alien segment translocation＇, through either male or female gametes, In general, the transmission ability through the female gametes was higher than that through the male gametes. By this approach, 14 translocation lines that involved different H. villosa chromosomes have been identified in the BC3 using EST-STS markers, and eight of them were homozygous.     

Chromosomal translocations in cancer

Genetic alterations in DNA can lead to cancer when it is present in proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, DNA repair genes etc. Examples of such alterations include deletions, inversions and chromosomal translocations. Among these rearrangements chromosomal translocations are considered as the primary cause for many cancers including lymphoma, leukemia and some solid tumors. Chromosomal translocations in certain cases can result either in the fusion of genes or in bringing genes close to enhancer or promoter elements, hence leading to their altered expression. Moreover, chromosomal translocations are used as diagnostic markers for cancer and its therapeutics. In the first part of this review, we summarize the well-studied chromosomal translocations in cancer. Although the mechanism of formation of most of these translocations is still unclear, in the second part we discuss the recent advances in this area of research.     

The promiscuous MLL gene links chromosomal translocations to cellular differentiation and tumour tropism

MLL is a promiscuous gene involved in a diversity of chromosomal fusions in haematological malignancies, usually resulting from chromosomal translocations. MLL-associated chromosomal rearrangements usually occur in tumours of specific haematological lineages, suggesting a crucial role for the MLL fusion partner in determining disease phenotype (or tumour tropism). The MLL gene is homologous to Drosophila trithorax, and is likewise involved in embryo pattern formation. Common themes linking several of the MLL partners include a possible involvement in embryo patterning via Hox gene regulation and chromatin remodelling. These findings reinforce the link between developmental regulation and chromosomal translocations, and indicate the role of chromosomal translocation in activating genes capable of determining tumour phenotype in leukaemias and sarcomas.     

Biochemical mechanisms of chromosomal translocations resulting from DNA double-strand breaks

Exposure of mammalian cells to agents that induce DNA double-strand breaks typically results in both reciprocal and nonreciprocal chromosome translocations. Over the past decade, breakpoint junctions of a significant number of translocations and other genomic rearrangements, both in clinical tumors and in experimental models, have been analyzed at the DNA sequence level. Based on these data, reasonable inferences regarding the biochemical mechanisms involved in translocations can be drawn. In a few cases, breakpoints have been shown to correlate with sites of double-strand cleavage by agents to which the cells or patients have been exposed, including exogenous rare-cutting endonucleases, radiomimetic compounds, and topoisomerase inhibitors. These results confirm that translocations primarily reflect misjoining of the exchanged ends of two or more double-strand breaks. Many junctions show significant loss of DNA sequence at the breakpoints, suggesting exonucleolytic degradation of DNA ends prior to joining. The size and frequency of these deletions varies widely, both between experimental systems, and among individual events in a single system. Homologous recombination between repetitive DNA sequences does not appear to be a major pathway for translocations associated with double-strand breaks. Rather, the general features of the junction sequences, particularly the high frequency small terminal deletions, the apparent splicing of DNA ends at microhomologies, and gap-filling on aligned double-strand break ends, are consistent with the known biochemical properties of the classical nonhomologous end joining pathway involving DNA-dependent protein kinase, XRCC4 and DNA ligase IV. Nevertheless, cells with deficiencies in this pathway still exhibit translocations, with grossly similar junction sequences, suggesting an alternative but less conservative end joining pathway. Although evidence for participation of specific DNA end processing enzymes in formation of translocations is largely circumstantial, likely candidates include DNA polymerases lambda and mu, Artemis nuclease, polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase, tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase, DNase III, Werner syndrome protein, and the Mre11/Rad50/NBS1 complex.     

Reidentification of chromosomal CUP1 translocations in the wine yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Reciprocal translocations between chromosomes XVI and VIII were revealed in eight Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains (mostly wine ones) using pulse-field electrophoresis of native chromosomal DNAs and their hybridizations with the CUP1 and GAL4 probes. New and reciprocal translocations of at least the gene CUP1 occur at the expense of crossing-over in the hybrids of such strains with the genetic lines of normal karyotype during meiosis. Relationship between these reciprocal translocations and the sulfite (Na₂SO₃) resistance gene SSU1-R is discussed.