利用Red同源重组系统进行牛β酪蛋白基因敲除

利用EL350基因工程菌进行同源重组, 成功进行基因敲除已有报道, 但利用该系统进行乳腺生物反应器质粒构建的研究却未见报道。实验采用含有完整的牛b 酪蛋白基因的CSN2质粒作为基因打靶的载体, 设计不同的同源臂, 成功地敲除了b 酪蛋白基因的编码区。并且同时利用同源重组技术对敲除不同大小的DNA片段的效率进行了研究。为进一步利用CSN2质粒两端的调控序列, 插入新的基因, 研究其表达功能, 或者进行乳腺生物反应器的研究奠定了基础。     

重组人gdnf乳腺特异表达载体转染牛胎儿成纤维细胞的研究

为了制备重组人GDNF牛乳腺生物反应器,采用组织块贴壁法分离培养雌性牛胎儿成纤维细胞,连续继代培养75d,进行形态观察和染色体分析,在此基础上,转染带有新霉素抗性和红色荧光蛋白双重筛选标记的重组人gdnf乳腺特异表达载体pNR-GDNF,G418筛选阳性抗性克隆,进行PCR法鉴定。结果表明,分离培养的牛胎儿成纤维细胞具有正常的形态、分裂增殖特性和染色体数目;目的基因已整合到转基因细胞的染色体上。     

人乳铁蛋白cDNA 基因乳腺表达载体的构建与鉴定

为了构建人乳铁蛋白基因 (hLF) 的乳腺表达载体并验证其在乳腺细胞中的表达情况,本载体以山羊β-casein基因上游包括启动子、外显子1、内含子1、部分外显子2作为5′端调控序列,下游包括部分外显子7、内含子7、外显子8、内含子8、外显子9及3′部分基因组片段作为3′端调控序列,长度分别为6.2 kb和7.1 kb,将hLF基因 (目的基因) 和Neo基因 (筛选标记) 分别插入到5′端调控序列和3′端调控序列的下游,构建成pBC1-hLF-Neo载体,其全长为25.348 kb。为了检测该载体的生物学     

ht-Pam基因在山羊β-酪蛋白基因座定位整合的研究

利用体细胞基因打靶与核移植技术制备动物乳腺生物反应器是当今转基因定位整合表达的一种新技术。分别克隆山羊的β-酪蛋白基因5′调控区的6.3kb片段,外显子7、外显子8和9三个基因片段,并与克隆的人tPA突变体cDNA一起构建了含有neo和tk正负筛选标记基因的β-酪蛋白基因打靶载体P^GBC4tPA,并验证了neo基因、tk基因以及Cre-LoxP系统的有效性。将线性化的P^GBC4tPA通过电转染整合到山羊胎儿成纤维细胞基因组中,利用G418和GANC进行抗性细胞克隆的药物筛选,初步获得抗性细胞克隆244个,PCR检测后获得阳性细胞克隆31个,其中初步验证2个细胞克隆转植基因整合位点重组后的基因序列正确,并且该细胞克隆能够有效扩增。这为下一步基因打靶体细胞核移植制备山羊乳腺生物反应器奠定了基础。     

Red/ET重组在基因打靶载体快速构建中的应用

通过合理应用Red/ET重组技术实现基因打靶载体的快速构建。在Red/ET重组介导下,首先从基因组DNA中将靶基因片段亚克隆至打靶质粒载体中,随后将两端带有50 bp同源臂的抗性筛选基因插入并替换靶基因上的目标序列,如此两步操作即可完成一个传统型基因敲除打靶载体的构建;结合Cre-loxP系统,在传统型基因敲除打靶载体的基础上,经过再一轮的Red/ET重组就能够成功实现条件性基因敲除打靶载体的构建。整个实验过程不需要PCR扩增长、短臂序列,也不涉及酶切、连接反应,因此,不仅省时、省力,而且所构建的基因打靶载体序列准确,无突变。此实验方法的建立为加速后基因组时代的基因功能研究提供了一条捷径。     

人血清白蛋白基因的打靶研究

为获得整合有人血清白蛋白(HSA)基因的猪胎儿成纤维细胞克隆,从猪基因组文库中杂交筛选得到猪血清白蛋白(PSA)基因全序列35kb并克隆了人血清白蛋白cDNA序列,扩增猪血清白蛋白基因5′调控序列7.2kb片段及第一内含子至第四内含子2.8kb的片段;构建了含有neo及tk正负筛选标记基因的人血清白蛋白基因打靶载体,并验证了neo基因的有效性。将线性化的打靶载体通过电击转染的方法整合到猪胎儿成纤维细胞基因组中,利用G418及GANC进行细胞克隆的抗药性筛选,PCR及Southern blot鉴定抗药性细胞克隆,最终获得3个发生同源重组的细胞克隆。这为下一步进行体细胞核移植制备生产人血清白蛋白转基因猪奠定了基础。     

通用型基因打靶载体的构建及其功能鉴定

为了构建适合大多数基因座位点打靶的通用型基因打靶载体及打靶成功后去除正选择标记基因,以克隆载体pGEM-3Z为骨架,插入了一个正选择标记基因新霉素磷酸转移酶基因(neo).两个相同的负选择标记基因单纯疱疹病毒胸苷激酶基因HSV-tk1和HSV-tk2,并在neo的两侧各添加了一个方向相同的LoxP(10cus of crossing-over(X)in P1)序列及两个不同的多克隆位点序列,从而构建了载体pA2T.插入的两个不同的多克隆位点序列中,neo和HSV-tk1之间的多克隆位点序列有8个稀少的酶切位点、neo和HSV-tk2之间的多克隆位点序列有5个稀少的酶切位点,neo、HSV-tk1和HSV-tk2有各自独立的转录单元.脂质体法转染山羊成纤维细胞,用遗传霉素(G418)和丙氧鸟苷(GAC)进行正负筛选,验证了正负选择标记基因的生物活性,证明通用型基因打靶载体pA2T构建成功.栽体pA2T转化组成性表达Cre重组醇(Cyclization recombination protein)的大肠杆菌BM25.8,检测到LoxP序列的生物活性,结果表明pA2T中的正选基因可以被Cre重组酶去除.因此,本研究所构建的通用型基因打靶载体pA2T,根据不同的基因座设计同源臂后,插入到MCS中可直接用于不同基因座位点的打靶,并能够在打靶成功后用Cre重组酶去除基因组中插入的neo基因,为用基因打靶的方法制作转基因动物提供了便利.     

Myostatin基因打靶载体的构建及猪胎儿成纤维细胞Myostatin基因的敲除

目的:用缺口修复等技术构建Myostatin(肌肉生长抑制素,MSTN)基因打靶载体,并对大白猪胎儿成纤维体细胞进行转染,获得基因敲除细胞。方法与结果:首先构建用于MSTN基因同源长臂(LA)的抓捕载体,然后在大肠杆菌内利用Red同源重组系统介导的缺口修复,从含大白猪MSTN基因座的细菌人工染色体上亚克隆9.9 kb的LA到抓捕载体上,经过部分序列测定,同源性为100%;通过PCR获得1.4 kb的同源短臂(SA);将LA和SA连入载体pLOXP,构建含有neo和tk正负筛选标记基因的MSTN基因打靶载体pLOXP-MSTN-KO;将线性化的pLOXP-MSTN-KO通过电转染整合到大白猪胎儿成纤维细胞基因组中,利用G418和丙氧鸟苷进行药物筛选,获得抗性细胞克隆890个,通过PCR和DNA测序鉴定获得基因敲除的细胞克隆4个。结论:构建了有效的MSTN基因打靶载体,通过转染获得基因敲除细胞,为利用体细胞核移植制备MSTN基因敲除猪奠定了基础。     

体细胞基因打靶制备动物乳腺生物反应器的策略与应用

在转基因动物研究中,由于基因表达调控元件的人工拼接和外源基因在动物基因组中随机整合所带来的“位置效应”,致使转基因动物外源基因的表达水平不高并且差异较大。为此,利用定位整合优势,对以基因同源重组为基础的基因打靶技术进行了大量研究。介绍了就利用体细胞基因打靶和核移植技术制备动物乳腺生物反应器的策略和应用情况做一综述,并对提高基因打靶效率的各种策略,打靶细胞的选择,转基因细胞核移植的低融合事件以及基因打靶制备乳腺生物反应器的优越性进行分析。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor