Analyses of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> cis</Emphasis> -acting elements that affect the transposition of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Mos1 mariner</Emphasis> transposons in vivo

The left (5) inverted terminal repeat (ITR) of the Mos1 mariner transposable element was altered by site-directed mutagenesis so that it exactly matched the nucleotide sequence of the right (3) ITR. The effects on the transposition frequency resulting from the use of two 3 ITRs, as well as those caused by the deletion of internal portions of the Mos1 element, were evaluated using plasmid-based transposition assays in Escherichia coli and Aedes aegypti. Donor constructs that utilized two 3 ITRs transposed with greater frequency in E. coli than did donor constructs with the wild-type ITR configuration. The lack of all but 10 bp of the internal sequence of Mos1 did not significantly affect the transposition frequency of a wild-type ITR donor. However, the lack of these internal sequences in a donor construct that utilized two 3 ITRs resulted in a further increase in transposition frequency. Conversely, the use of a donor construct with two 3 ITRs did not result in a significant increase in transposition in Ae. aegypti. Furthermore, deletion of a large portion of the internal Mos1 sequence resulted in the loss of transposition activity in the mosquito. The results of this study indicate the possible presence of a negative regulator of transposition located within the internal sequence, and suggest that the putative negative regulatory element may act to inhibit binding of the transposase to the left ITR. The results also indicate that host factors which are absent in E. coli, influence Mos1 transposition in Ae. aegypti.Communicated by G. P. Georgiev     

Regulation of mariner transposition: the peculiar case of mos1

Background

Mariner elements represent the most successful family of autonomous DNA transposons, being present in various plant and animal genomes, including humans. The introduction and co-evolution of mariners within host genomes imply a strict regulation of the transposon activity. Biochemical data accumulated during the past decade have led to a convergent picture of the transposition cycle of mariner elements, suggesting that mariner transposition does not rely on host-specific factors. This model does not account for differences of transposition efficiency in human cells between mariners. We thus wondered whether apparent similarities in transposition cycle could hide differences in the intrinsic parameters that control mariner transposition.

Principal Findings

We find that Mos1 transposase concentrations in excess to the Mos1 ends prevent the paired-end complex assembly. However, we observe that Mos1 transposition is not impaired by transposase high concentration, dismissing the idea that transposase over production plays an obligatory role in the down-regulation of mariner transposition. Our main finding is that the paired-end complex is formed in a cooperative way, regardless of the transposase concentration. We also show that an element framed by two identical ITRs (Inverted Terminal Repeats) is more efficient in driving transposition than an element framed by two different ITRs (i.e. the natural Mos1 copy), the latter being more sensitive to transposase concentration variations. Finally, we show that the current Mos1 ITRs correspond to the ancestral ones.

Conclusions

We provide new insights on intrinsic properties supporting the self-regulation of the Mos1 element. These properties (transposase specific activity, aggregation, ITR sequences, transposase concentration/transposon copy number ratio…) could have played a role in the dynamics of host-genomes invasion by Mos1, accounting (at least in part) for the current low copy number of Mos1 within host genomes.     

Assembly of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Tc1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">mariner</Emphasis> transposition initiation complexes depends on the origins of their transposase DNA binding domains

In this review, we focus on the assembly of DNA/protein complexes that trigger transposition in eukaryotic members of the IS630–Tc1–mariner (ITm) super-family, the Tc1- and mariner-like elements (TLEs and MLEs). Elements belonging to this super-family encode transposases with DNA binding domains of different origins, and recent data indicate that the chimerization of functional domains has been an important evolutionary aspect in the generation of new transposons within the ITm super-family. These data also reveal that the inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) at the ends of transposons contain three kinds of motif within their sequences. The first two are well known and correspond to the cleavage site on the outer ITR extremities, and the transposase DNA binding site. The organization of ITRs and of the transposase DNA binding domains implies that differing pathways are used by MLEs and TLEs to regulate transposition initiation. These differences imply that the ways ITRs are recognized also differ leading to the formation of differently organized synaptic complexes. The third kind of motif is the transposition enhancers, which have been found in almost all the functional MLEs and TLEs analyzed to date. Finally, in vitro and in vivo assays of various elements all suggest that the transposition initiation complex is not formed randomly, but involves a mechanism of oriented transposon scanning. Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available to authorised users in the online version of this article at . An erratum to this article can be found at     

The wild-type conformation of the Mos-1 Inverted Terminal Repeats is suboptimal for transposition in bacteria

The two inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) flanking the Mos-1 mariner element differ in sequence at four positions. Gel retardation experiments indicated that each of these differences has a significant impact on the quality of the interaction between the ITR and the Mos-1 transposase. We showed that the transposase binds to the 3' ITR better than to the 5' ITR. The results of transposition assays performed in Escherichia coli indicated that these differences have an influence on the rate of transposition and the stability of the transposition products. Finally, we find that the wild-type configuration of the Mos-1 element, with one 5' ITR and one 3' ITR, is less efficient for transposition in bacteria than that of an element having two 3' ITRs.     

Manipulating the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Caenorhabditis elegans</Emphasis> genome using <Emphasis Type="Italic">mariner</Emphasis> transposons

Tc1, one of the founding members of the Tc1/mariner transposon superfamily, was identified in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans more than 25 years ago. Over the years, Tc1 and other endogenous mariner transposons became valuable tools for mutagenesis and targeted gene inactivation in C. elegans. However, transposition is naturally repressed in the C. elegans germline by an RNAi-like mechanism, necessitating the use of mutant strains in which transposition was globally derepressed, which causes drawbacks such as uncontrolled proliferation of the transposons in the genome and accumulation of background mutations. The more recent mobilization of the Drosophila mariner transposon Mos1 in the C. elegans germline circumvented the problems inherent to endogenous transposons. Mos1 transposition strictly depends on the expression of the Mos transposase, which can be controlled in the germline using inducible promoters. First, Mos1 can be used for insertional mutagenesis. The mobilization of Mos1 copies present on an extrachromosomal array results in the generation of a small number of Mos1 genomic insertions that can be rapidly cloned by inverse PCR. Second, Mos1 insertions can be used for genome engineering. Triggering the excision of a genomic Mos1 insertion causes a chromosomal break, which can be repaired by transgene-instructed gene conversion. This process is used to introduce specific changes in a given gene, such as point mutations, deletions or insertions of a tag, and to create single-copy transgenes.     

Characterization of <Emphasis Type="Italic">EamaT1</Emphasis>, a member of <Emphasis Type="Italic">maT</Emphasis> family of transposable elements from the earthworm <Emphasis Type="Italic">Eisenia andrei</Emphasis> (Annelida,Oligochaeta)

The maT family is a unique clade within the Tc1-mariner superfamily, and their distribution is to date known as being limited to invertebrates. A novel transposon named EamaT1 is described from the genome of the earthworm Eisenia andrei. The full sized EamaT1 was obtained by degenerate and inverse PCR-based amplification. Sequence analysis of multiple copies of the EamaT1, which consisted of 0.9 and 1.4 kb elements, showed that the consensual EamaT1 with inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of 69 bp was 1,422 bp long and flanked by a duplicated TA dinucleotide. The EamaT1 is present in approximately 120–250 copies per diploid genome but undergoes an inactivation process as a result of accumulating multiple mutations and is nonfunctional. The open reading frame (ORF) of the EamaT1 consensus encoding 356 amino acid sequences of transposase contained a DD37D signature and a conserved paired-like DNA binding motif for the transposition mechanism. The result of ITRs comparison confirmed their consensus terminal sequences (5′-CAGGGTG-3′) and AT-rich region on the internal bases for ITRs-transposase interaction.     

Mutant Mos1 mariner transposons are hyperactive in Aedes aegypti

The development of genetic strategies to control the spread of mosquito-borne diseases through the use of class II transposons has been hampered by suboptimal rates of transformation and the absence of post-integration mobility for all transposons evaluated to date. Two Mos1 mariner transposase mutants were produced by the site-directed mutagenesis of amino acids, E137 and E264, to K and R, respectively. The effects of these mutations on the transpositional activities of Mos1-derived transposon constructs were evaluated by interplasmid transposition assays in Escherichia coli and Aedes aegypti. The transpositional activities of two Mos1 transposons, one with imperfect wild type inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) and another that contained two perfectly matched 3' ITRs, were increased when the mutant transposases were supplied in trans in E. coli. The use of the perfect repeat transposon with wild type transposase did not result in an increase in transposition frequency in Ae. aegypti. However, an improvement in the integrity of the transposition process did occur, as evidenced by a lower rate of recombination events in which the transgene was transferred. An increase in the transpositional activity of the perfect repeat transposon was observed in the mosquito in the presence of either mutant transposase, and in the case of the E264R transposase, the observed increase in transposition frequency was also accompanied by a further improvement in the integrity of transposition. We discuss the possible contributions of these mutant residues to the transposition of the perfect repeat Mos1 transposon, the implications of these results with respect to the molecular evolution of Mos1, and the potential uses of the perfect repeat transposon and mutant transposases for the improvement of Mos1 mediated germ line transformation of Ae. aegypti.     

The ITR binding domain of the Mariner Mos-1 transposase

Mariner-like elements are widespread eukaryotic transposons, but Mos-1 is the only natural element that is known to be active. Little is known about the biochemistry of mariner transposition. The first step in the process is the binding of the transposase to the 5' and 3' inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of the element. Using the 3' ITR of the element, we have determined the binding properties of a recombinant Mos-1 transposase produced in bacteria, and we have used deletion derivatives to localize the minimal ITR binding domain between amino acids 1 and 141. Its features and structure indicate that it differs from the ITR binding domain of the transposase encoded by Tc1-related elements.     

Survey of Mariner-Like Elements in the Housefly, Musca Domestica

The presence of mariner-like elements in four strains of the housefly, Musca domestica, was surveyed by PCR. Using the inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequences of the Mos 1element as primers, DNAs were successfully amplified from all strains of the housefly. Southern blot analysis indicated that these amplified DNAs were repetitive sequences in the genome of M. domestica. Sequence analyses of cloned PCR products showed that they were 45% identical to the Mos 1element. These fragments appeared to be nonfunctional, because they contained no intact open reading frame (ORF) capable of encoding transposase. We conclude that these DNAs are degraded mariner-like elements (MLEs) in M. domestica. Because these endogenous MLEs in M. domesticado not encode any functional proteins, they probably would not affect the behavior of mariner-based vectors if such were introduced into this species as transformation vectors.     

Conservation of Palindromic and Mirror Motifs within Inverted Terminal Repeats of mariner-like Elements

The transposase of the mariner-like elements (MLEs) specifically binds as a dimer to the inverted terminal repeat of the transposon that encodes it. Two binding-motifs located within the inverted terminal sequences (ITR) are therefore recognized, as previously indicated, by biochemical data obtained with the Mos1 and Himar1 transposases. Here, we define the motifs that are involved in the binding of a MLE transposase to its ITR by analyzing the nucleic acid properties of the 5' and 3' ITR sequences from 45 MLEs, taking into account the fact that the transposase binds to the ITR, using its CRO binding domains and the general characteristics of the cro binding sites so far investigated. Our findings show that in all the MLE ITRs, the outer half was better conserved than the inner half. More interestingly, they allowed us to characterize conserved palindromic and mirror motifs specific to each "MLE species". The presence of the palindromic motifs was correlated to the binding of the transposase dimer, whereas the properties of the mirror motifs were shown to be responsible for the bend in each ITR that helps to stabilize transposase-ITR interactions.     

Hvmar1, a mariner‐like element from the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens,can transpose in Drosophila melanogaster

Transposable elements of the mariner family are widespread and have been found in the genome of plants, animals and insects. However, most of these elements contain multiple inactivating mutations and so far, only three naturally occurring mariner elements are known to be functional. In a previous study, a mariner‐like element called Hvmar1 was discovered in the genome of the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens. Further analysis of the Hvmar1 nucleotide sequence revealed the presence of 30‐bp imperfect inverted terminal repeats and an intact open reading frame, which is considered to encode a functional transposase. In the present study, we show that the Hvmar1 element is active using interplasmid transposition assays in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. When injected into Drosophila embryos, the helper plasmid produced a transposase that was able to mediate transposition of the Hvmar1 element from a donor to a target plasmid. The transposition efficiency of Hvmar1 in D. melanogaster is approximately 11‐fold lower than that of the well‐known Mos1 mariner transposon. However, this efficiency is comparable to those observed previously with Mos1 in non‐Drosophila insects. We identified 10 independent interplasmid transposition events, albeit the recovery of these events was rare. In each case the Hvmar1 element transposed in a precise manner, with the characteristic TA dinucleotides being duplicated on insertion. Furthermore, two of the target sites identified have been used previously by Mos1 for insertion. The active transposition of Hvmar1 in D. melanogaster provides a basis for examining the mobility of this element in its natural host as well as a starting point for comparative studies with Mos1 and other functional mariner transposons.     

Transduplication resulted in the incorporation of two protein-coding sequences into the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Turmoil</Emphasis>-1 transposable element of <Emphasis Type="Italic">C. elegans</Emphasis>

   

Transposable elements may acquire unrelated gene fragments into their sequences in a process called transduplication. Transduplication of protein-coding genes is common in plants, but is unknown of in animals. Here, we report that the Turmoil-1 transposable element in C. elegans has incorporated two protein-coding sequences into its inverted terminal repeat (ITR) sequences. The ITRs of Turmoil-1 contain a conserved RNA recognition motif (RRM) that originated from the rsp-2 gene and a fragment from the protein-coding region of the cpg-3 gene. We further report that an open reading frame specific to C. elegans may have been created as a result of a Turmoil-1 insertion. Mutations at the 5' splice site of this open reading frame may have reactivated the transduplicated RRM motif.     

Transposase-transposase interactions in MOS1 complexes: a biochemical approach

Transposases are proteins that have assumed the mobility of class II transposable elements. In order to map the interfaces involved in transposase-transposase interactions, we have taken advantage of 12 transposase mutants that impair mariner transposase-transposase interactions taking place during transposition. Our data indicate that transposase-transposase interactions regulating Mos1 transposition are sophisticated and result from (i) active MOS1 dimerization through the first HTH of the N-terminal domain, which leads to inverted terminal repeat (ITR) binding; (ii) inactive dimerization carried by part of the C-terminal domain, which prevents ITR binding; and (iii) oligomerization. Inactive dimers are nonpermissive in organizing complexes that produce ITR binding, but the interfaces (or interactions) supplied in this state could play a role in the various rearrangements needed during transposition. Oligomerization is probably not due to a specific MOS1 domain, but rather the result of nonspecific interactions resulting from incorrect folding of the protein. Our data also suggest that the MOS1 catalytic domain is a main actor in the overall organization of MOS1, thus playing a role in MOS1 oligomerization. Finally, we propose that MOS1 behaves as predicted by the pre-equilibrium existing model, whereby proteins are found to exist simultaneously in populations with diverse conformations, monomers and active and inactive dimers for MOS1. We were able to identify several MOS1 mutants that modify this pre-existing equilibrium. According to their properties, some of these mutants will be useful tools to break down the remaining gaps in our understanding of mariner transposition.     

cis and trans factors affecting Mos1 mariner evolution and transposition in vitro, and its potential for functional genomics

Mos1 and other mariner/Tc1 transposons move horizontally during evolution, and when transplanted into heterologous species can transpose in organisms ranging from prokaryotes to protozoans and vertebrates. To further develop the Drosophila Mos1 mariner system as a genetic tool and to probe mechanisms affecting the regulation of transposition activity, we developed an in vitro system for Mos1 transposition using purified transposase and selectable Mos1 derivatives. Transposition frequencies of nearly 10^–3/target DNA molecule were obtained, and insertions occurred at TA dinucleotides with little other sequence specificity. Mos1 elements containing only the 28 bp terminal inverted repeats were inactive in vitro, while elements containing a few additional internal bases were fully active, establishing the minimal cis-acting requirements for transposition. With increasing transposase the transposition frequency increased to a plateau value, in contrast to the predictions of the protein overexpression inhibition model and to that found recently with a reconstructed Himar1 transposase. This difference between the ‘natural’ Mos1 and ‘reconstructed’ Himar1 transposases suggests an evolutionary path for down-regulation of mariner transposition following its introduction into a naïve population. The establishment of the cis and trans requirements for optimal mariner transposition in vitro provides key data for the creation of vectors for in vitro mutagenesis, and will facilitate the development of in vivo systems for mariner transposition.     

The mariner Mos1 transposase produced in tobacco is active in vitro

The mariner-like transposon Mos1 is used for insertional mutagenesis and transgenesis in different animals (insects, nematodes), but has never been used in plants. In this paper, the transposition activity of Mos1 was tested in Nicotiana tabacum, but no transposition event was detected. In an attempt to understand the absence of in planta transposition, Mos1 transposase (MOS1) was produced and purified from transgenic tobacco (HMNtMOS1). HMNtMOS1 was able to perform all transposition reaction steps in vitro: binding to ITR, excision and integration of the same pseudo-transposon used in in planta transposition assays. The in vitro transposition reaction was not inhibited by tobacco nuclear proteins, and did not depend on the temperature used for plant growth. Several hypotheses are proposed that could explain the inhibition of HMNtMOS1 activity in planta.     

Target site selection by the <Emphasis Type="Italic">mariner</Emphasis>-like element, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Mos1</Emphasis>

The eukaryotic transposon Mos1 is a class-II transposable element that moves using a “cut-and-paste” mechanism in which the transposase is the only protein factor required. The formation of the excision complex is well documented, but the integration step has so far received less investigation. Like all mariner-like elements, Mos1 was thought to integrate into a TA dinucleotide without displaying any other target selection preferences. We set out to synthesize what is currently known about Mos1 insertion sites, and to define the characteristics of Mos1 insertion sequences in vitro and in vivo. Statistical analysis can be used to identify the TA dinucleotides that are non-randomly targeted for transposon integration. In vitro, no specific feature determining target choice other than the requirement for a TA dinucleotide has been identified. In vivo, data were obtained from two previously reported integration hotspots: the bacterial cat gene and the Caenorhabditis elegans rDNA locus. Analysis of these insertion sites revealed a preference for TA dinucleotides that are included in TATA or TA × TA motifs, or located within AT-rich regions. Analysis of the physical properties of sequences obtained in vitro and in vivo do not help to explain Mos1 integration preferences, suggesting that other characteristics must be involved in Mos1 target choice.     

Structure-function analysis of the inverted terminal repeats of the sleeping beauty transposon

Translocation of Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon requires specific binding of SB transposase to inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of about 230 bp at each end of the transposon, which is followed by a cut-and-paste transfer of the transposon into a target DNA sequence. The ITRs contain two imperfect direct repeats (DRs) of about 32 bp. The outer DRs are at the extreme ends of the transposon whereas the inner DRs are located inside the transposon, 165-166 bp from the outer DRs. Here we investigated the roles of the DR elements in transposition. Although there is a core transposase-binding sequence common to all of the DRs, additional adjacent sequences are required for transposition and these sequences vary in the different DRs. As a result, SB transposase binds less tightly to the outer DRs than to the inner DRs. Two DRs are required in each ITR for transposition but they are not interchangeable for efficient transposition. Each DR appears to have a distinctive role in transposition. The spacing and sequence between the DR elements in an ITR affect transposition rates, suggesting a constrained geometry is involved in the interactions of SB transposase molecules in order to achieve precise mobilization. Transposons are flanked by TA dinucleotide base-pairs that are important for excision; elimination of the TA motif on one side of the transposon significantly reduces transposition while loss of TAs on both flanks of the transposon abolishes transposition. These findings have led to the construction of a more advanced transposon that should be useful in gene transfer and insertional mutagenesis in vertebrates.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Mariner Mos1</Emphasis> transposase optimization by rational mutagenesis

Mariner transposons are probably the most widespread transposable element family in animal genomes. To date, they are believed not to require species-specific host factors for transposition. Despite this, Mos1, one of the most-studied mariner elements (with Himar1), has been shown to be active in insects, but inactive in mammalian genomes. To circumvent this problem, one strategy consists of both enhancing the activity of the Mos1 transposase (MOS1), and making it insensitive to activity-altering post-translational modifications. Here, we report rational mutagenesis studies performed to obtain hyperactive and non-phosphorylable MOS1 variants. Transposition assays in bacteria have made it possible to isolate numerous hyperactive MOS1 variants. The best mutant combinations, named FETY and FET, are 60- and 800-fold more active than the wild-type MOS1 version, respectively. However, there are serious difficulties in using them, notably because they display severe cytotoxicity. On the other hand, three positions lying within the HTH motif, T88, S99, and S104 were found to be sensitive to phosphorylation. Our efforts to obtain active non-phosphorylable mutants at S99 and S104 positions were unsuccessful, as these residues, like the co-linear amino acids in their close vicinity, are critical for MOS1 activity. Even if host factors are not essential for transposition, our data demonstrate that the host machinery is essential in regulating MOS1 activity.     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">Caenorhabditis</Emphasis><Emphasis Type="Italic">briggsae</Emphasis> genome contains active <Emphasis Type="Italic">CbmaT1</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Tcb1</Emphasis> transposons

The maT clade of transposons is a group of transposable elements intermediate in sequence and predicted protein structure to mariner and Tc transposons, with a distribution thus far limited to a few invertebrate species. We present evidence, based on searches of publicly available databases, that the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae has several maT-like transposons, which we have designated as CbmaT elements, dispersed throughout its genome. We also describe two additional transposon sequences that probably share their evolutionary history with the CbmaT transposons. One resembles a fold back variant of a CbmaT element, with long (380-bp) inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) that show a high degree (71%) of identity to CbmaT1. The other, which shares only the 26-bp ITR sequences with one of the CbmaT variants, is present in eight nearly identical copies, but does not have a transposase gene and may therefore be cross mobilised by a CbmaT transposase. Using PCR-based mobility assays, we show that CbmaT1 transposons are capable of excising from the C. briggsae genome. CbmaT1 excised approximately 500 times less frequently than Tcb1 in the reference strain AF16, but both CbmaT1 and Tcb1 excised at extremely high frequencies in the HK105 strain. The HK105 strain also exhibited a high frequency of spontaneous induction of unc-22 mutants, suggesting that it may be a mutator strain of C. briggsae.     

Analysis of Tn3 sequences required for transposition and immunity

Tn3 is a 5-kb transposon (Tn) with 38-bp inverted terminal repeats (ITR). The two 38-bp terminal sequences are required in cis for Tn3 transposition. In this study, the role of the ITR in Tn3 transposition has been further dissected by the use of various mini-Tn3 Tn's. The transposition frequency of these mini-Tn's demonstrate that Tn3 contains no sequence other than the ITR sequences that are necessary for the first step in transposition; the two terminal repeats must be oriented as ITR for transposition to occur; the outside 34 bp of the ITR are required for transposition; and reducing the distance between the terminal sequences does not affect transposition frequency. Moreover, mutant copies of the ITR sequences that cannot function in transposition do not confer transposition immunity.