Conserved amphipathic helices near the N-terminus and C-terminus of the alpha subunit of cranin (dystroglycan)

Cranin (dystroglycan) is a ubiquitously expressed extracellular matrix receptor, synthesized as a single precursor, which is cleaved into an extracellular subunit (alpha) and a transmembrane subunit (beta). The primary sequence of cranin (dystroglycan) is known from cDNA cloning, and the protein has been strongly implicated in morphogenesis, cell adhesion and human disease. Nevertheless, the domain structure of the alpha subunit has not been well studied; although the protein binds to matrix proteins, to the beta subunit, to cell surfaces, and possibly to other membrane proteins such as sarcoglycans, the domains responsible for mediating these interactions remain unknown. Here I report computer analyses that identify two distinctive amphipathic alpha-helical regions near the N-terminus and C-terminus of the alpha subunit, which are conserved in all species for which sequence information is currently available. This finding should stimulate and guide experimental studies designed to understand how the alpha subunit is associated with the cell surface and with its various ligands.     

Rab18 binds PLIN2 and ACSL3 to mediate lipid droplet dynamics

Lipid droplet (LD) is a vital organelle governing lipid homeostasis and Rab18 has been linked to lipid metabolism. However, the mechanisms of Rab18-mediated LD dynamics in myoblast cells remain elusive. Here, we report that Rab18 plays an important role in oleic acid (OA)-induced LD accumulation in mouse myoblast C2C12 cells. Rab18 was translocated from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to LDs during LD accumulation, which was regulated by perilipin 2 (PLIN2), a major LD protein. LD-associated Rab18 bound with the C terminus of PLIN2 and the LD localization of Rab18 was diminished when PLIN2 was depleted. Moreover, loss of function of Rab18 led to reduced triacylglycerol (TAG) level and fewer but larger LDs. In contrast, overexpression of Rab18 resulted in elevated TAG content and LD number. Furthermore, LD-associated Rab18 interacted with acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 3 (ACSL3), which in turn promoted the LD localization of this protein. These data show that Rab18 interacts with PLIN2 and forms a complex with PLIN2 and ACSL3, which plays a critical role in LD accumulation and dynamics of myoblast cells.     

Design of stable α‐helices using global sequence optimization

The rational design of peptide and protein helices is not only of practical importance for protein engineering but also is a useful approach in attempts to improve our understanding of protein folding. Recent modifications of theoretical models of helix‐coil transitions allow accurate predictions of the helix stability of monomeric peptides in water and provide new possibilities for protein design. We report here a new method for the design of α‐helices in peptides and proteins using AGADIR, the statistical mechanical theory for helix‐coil transitions in monomeric peptides and the tunneling algorithm of global optimization of multidimensional functions for optimization of amino acid sequences. CD measurements of helical content of peptides with optimized sequences indicate that the helical potential of protein amino acids is high enough to allow formation of stable α‐helices in peptides as short as of 10 residues in length. The results show the maximum achievable helix content (HC) of short peptides with fully optimized sequences at 5 °C is expected to be ～70–75%. Under certain conditions the method can be a powerful practical tool for protein engineering. Unlike traditional approaches that are often used to increase protein stability by adding a few favorable interactions to the protein structure, this method deals with all possible sequences of protein helices and selects the best one from them. Copyright © 2009 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The NTPase activity of the double FYVE domain–containing protein 1 regulates lipid droplet metabolism

Lipid droplets (LDs) are transient lipid storage organelles that can be readily tapped to resupply cells with energy or lipid building blocks and therefore play a central role in cellular metabolism. However, the molecular factors and underlying mechanisms that regulate the growth and degradation of LDs are poorly understood. It has emerged that proteins that establish contacts between LDs and the endoplasmic reticulum play a critical role in regulating LD metabolism. Recently, the autophagy-related protein, double FYVE domain–containing protein 1 (DFCP1/ZFYVE1) was shown to reside at the interface of the endoplasmic reticulum and LDs, however, little is known about the involvement of DFCP1 in autophagy and LD metabolism. Here, we show that DFCP1 is a novel NTPase that regulates free fatty acid metabolism. Specifically, we show that DFPC1-knockdown, particularly during starvation, increases cellular free fatty acids and decreases the levels of cellular TAGs, resulting in accumulated small LDs. Using selective truncations, we demonstrate that DFCP1 accumulation on LDs in cells and in vitro is regulated by a previously unknown NTPase domain. Using spectroscopic approaches, we show that this NTPase domain can dimerize and can hydrolyze both ATP and GTP. Furthermore, mutations in DFCP1 that either impact nucleotide hydrolysis or dimerization result in changes in the accumulation of DFCP1 on LDs, changes in LD density and size, and colocalization of LDs to autophagosomes. Collectively, our findings suggest that DFCP1 is an NTPase that modulates the metabolism of LDs in cells.     

Phosphorylation stabilizes the N‐termini of α‐helices

The role of phosphorylation in stabilizing the N‐termini of α‐helices is examined using computer simulations of model peptides. The models comprise either a phosphorylated or unphosphorylated serine at the helix N‐terminus, followed by nine alanines. Monte Carlo/stochastic Dynamics simulations were performed on the model helices. The simulations revealed a distinct stabilization of the helical conformation at the N‐terminus after phosphorylation. The stabilization was attributable to favorable electrostatic interactions between the phosphate and the helix backbone. However, direct helix capping by the phosphorylated sidechain was not observed. The results of the calculations are consistent with experimental evidence on the stabilization of helices by phosphates and other anions. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 49: 225–233, 1999     

Structural requirements for cellular uptake of α‐helical amphipathic peptides

The structure of the cell‐permeable α‐helical amphipathic model peptide FLUOS‐KLALKLALKALKAALKLA‐NH₂ ( I ) was modified stepwise with respect to its helix parameters hydrophobicity, hydrophobic moment and hydrophilic face as well as molecular size and charge. Cellular uptake and membrane destabilizing activity of the resulting peptides were studied using aortic endothelial cells and HPLC combined with CLSM. With the exceptions that a reduction of molecule size below 16 amino acid residues and the introduction of a negative net charge abolished uptake, none of the investigated structural parameters proved to be essential for the passage of these peptides across the plasma membrane. Membrane toxicity also showed no correlation to any of the parameters investigated and could be detected only at concentrations higher than 2 μm . These results implicate helical amphipathicity as the only essential structural requirement for the entry of such peptides into the cell interior, in accord with earlier studies. The pivotal role of helical amphipathicity was confirmed by uptake results obtained with two further pairs of amphipathic/non‐amphipathic 18‐mer peptides with different primary structure, net charge and helix parameters from I . The amphipathic counterparts were internalized into the cells to a comparable extent as I , whereas no cellular uptake could be detected for the non‐amphipathic analogues. The mode of uptake remains unclear and involves both temperature‐sensitive and ‐insensitive processes, indicating non‐endocytic contributions. Copyright © 1999 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Surface features of the lipid droplet mediate perilipin 2 localization

All eukaryotic organisms store excess lipid in intracellular lipid droplets. These dynamic structures are associated with and regulated by numerous proteins. Perilipin 2, an abundant protein on most lipid droplets, promotes neutral lipid accumulation in lipid droplets. However, the mechanism by which perilipin 2 binds to and remains anchored on the lipid droplet surface is unknown. Here we identify features of the lipid droplet surface that influence perilipin 2 localization. We show that perilipin 2 binding to the lipid droplet surface requires both hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Reagents that disrupt these interactions also decrease binding. Moreover, perilipin 2 binding does not depend on other lipid droplet-associated proteins but is influenced by the lipid composition of the surface. Perilipin 2 binds to synthetic vesicles composed of dioleoylphosphatidylcholine, a phospholipid with unsaturated acyl chains. Decreasing the temperature of the binding reaction, or introducing phospholipids with saturated acyl chains, decreases binding. We therefore demonstrate a role for surface lipids and acyl chain packing in perilipin 2 binding to lipid droplets. The ability of the lipid droplet phospholipid composition to impact protein binding may link changes in nutrient availability to lipid droplet homeostasis.     

Monotopic topology is required for lipid droplet targeting of ancient ubiquitous protein 1

Ancient ubiquitous protein 1 (AUP1) is a multifunctional protein, which acts on both lipid droplets (LDs) and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Double localization to these two organelles, featuring very different membrane characteristics, was observed also for several other integral proteins, but little is known about the signals and mechanisms behind dual protein targeting to ER and LDs. Here we dissect the AUP1 targeting signals by analyses of localization and topology of several deletion and point mutants. We found that AUP1 is inserted into the membrane of the ER in a monotopic hairpin fashion, and subsequently transported to the hemi-membrane of LDs. A single domain localized in the N-terminal part of AUP1 enables its ER residence, the monotopic insertion, and the LD localization. Different specific residues within this multifunctional domain are responsible for achieving the complex spatial distribution pattern. A mutation of three amino acids, which changes AUP1 topology from hairpin to transmembrane, abolishes LD localization. These findings suggest that the cell is able to target a protein to multiple intracellular locations using a single domain.     

Marginally hydrophobic transmembrane α‐helices shaping membrane protein folding

Cells have developed an incredible machinery to facilitate the insertion of membrane proteins into the membrane. While we have a fairly good understanding of the mechanism and determinants of membrane integration, more data is needed to understand the insertion of membrane proteins with more complex insertion and folding pathways. This review will focus on marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helices and their influence on membrane protein folding. These weakly hydrophobic transmembrane segments are by themselves not recognized by the translocon and therefore rely on local sequence context for membrane integration. How can such segments reside within the membrane? We will discuss this in the light of features found in the protein itself as well as the environment it resides in. Several characteristics in proteins have been described to influence the insertion of marginally hydrophobic helices. Additionally, the influence of biological membranes is significant. To begin with, the actual cost for having polar groups within the membrane may not be as high as expected; the presence of proteins in the membrane as well as characteristics of some amino acids may enable a transmembrane helix to harbor a charged residue. The lipid environment has also been shown to directly influence the topology as well as membrane boundaries of transmembrane helices—implying a dynamic relationship between membrane proteins and their environment.     

Membrane partitioning and lipid selectivity of the N-terminal amphipathic H0 helices of endophilin isoforms

Endophilin is an N-BAR protein, which is characterized by a crescent-shaped BAR domain and an amphipathic helix that contributes to the membrane binding of these proteins. The exact function of that H0 helix has been a topic of debate. In mammals, there are five different endophilin isoforms, grouped into A (three members) and B (two members) subclasses, which have been described to differ in their subcellular localization and function. We asked to what extent molecular properties of the H0 helices of these members affect their membrane targeting behavior.We found that all H0 helices of the endophilin isoforms display a two-state equilibrium between disordered and α-helical states in which the helical secondary structure can be stabilized through trifluoroethanol. The helicities in high TFE were strikingly different among the H0 peptides. We investigated H0-membrane partitioning by the monitoring of secondary structure changes via CD spectroscopy. We found that the presence of anionic phospholipids is critical for all H0 helices partitioning into membranes. Membrane partitioning is found to be sensitive to variations in membrane complexity. Overall, the H0 B subfamily displays stronger membrane partitioning than the H0 A subfamily. The H0 A peptide-membrane binding occurs predominantly through electrostatic interactions. Variation among the H0 A subfamily may be attributed to slight alterations in the amino acid sequence. Meanwhile, the H0 B subfamily displays greater specificity for certain membrane compositions, and this may link H0 B peptide binding to endophilin B's cellular function.     

Synthesis and characterization of β‐peptide helices as transmembrane domains in lipid model membranes

Aggregation, orientation and dynamics of transmembrane helices are of relevance for protein function and transmembrane signaling. To explore the interactions of transmembrane helices and the interdependence of peptide structure and lipid composition of the membranes, β‐peptides were explored as model transmembrane domains. Various hydrophobic β‐peptide sequences were synthesized by solid phase peptide synthesis. Conformational analyses of β‐peptide helices were performed in organic solvents (methanol and 2,2,2‐trifluoroethanol) and in large unilamellar liposomes (dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine and dioleoylphosphatidylcholine) indicating 12‐ and 14‐helix conformations, depending on β³‐amino acid sequences. The intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of β³‐homotryptophan units inserted in the center or near the end of the sequence was used to verify the membrane insertion of the β‐peptides. A characteristic blue shift with peripheral β³‐homotryptophan compared with β‐peptides with central tryptophan served as indication for a transmembrane orientation of the β‐peptides within the lipid bilayer. Copyright © 2016 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Hydrophilic surface maps of channel-forming peptides: analysis of amphipathic helices

Ion channels may be formed by bundles of amphipathic -helices aligned parallel to one another and spanning a lipid bilayer membrane, with the hydrophilic faces of the helices lining a central pore. In order to provide insight into the packing of such helices in bundles, a method has been developed to evalute hydrophilic surface maps of amphipathic -helices and to display these surfaces in a readily interpretable form. The procedure is based upon empirical energy calculations of interactions of a water molecule with an amphipathic -helix. The method has been applied to three channel-forming peptides: Staphylococcal -toxin; alamethicin; and a synthetic leucine- and serine-containing peptide. Particular emphasis is placed upon the effects of sidechain conformational flexibility on hydrophilic surface maps. Å family of models of the -toxin; helix is generated by a simulated annealing procedure. The results of hydrophilic surface map analyses provide more exact definition of the centre of the hydrophilic face of amphipathic helices, and of the variation of the position of the centre in response to changes in sidechain conformation. This information is used to define families of preliminary models for a given ion channel, as is illustrated for -toxin.Abbreviations ABNR adopted basis Newton-Raphson - CFP channel-forming peptide - HSM hydrophilic surface map - MHP molecular hydrophobicity potential - RMSD root mean square deviation Correspondence to: M. S. P. Sansom     

Relationship of sidechain hydrophobicity and α-helical propensity on the stability of the single-stranded amphipathic α-helix

The aim of the present investigation is to determine the effect of α-helical propensity and sidechain hydrophobicity on the stability of amphipathic α-helices. Accordingly, a series of 18-residue amphipathic α-helical peptides has been synthesized as a model system where all 20 amino acid residues were substituted on the hydrophobic face of the amphipathic α-helix. In these experiments, all three parameters (sidechain hydrophobicity, α-helical propensity and helix stability) were measured on the same set of peptide analogues. For these peptide analogues that differ by only one amino acid residue, there was a 0.96 kcal/mole difference in α-helical propensity between the most (Ala) and the least (Gly) α-helical analogue, a 12.1-minute difference between the most (Phe) and the least (Asp) retentive analogue on the reversed-phase column, and a 32.3°C difference in melting temperatures between the most (Leu) and the least (Asp) stable analogue. The results show that the hydrophobicity and α-helical propensity of an amino acid sidechain are not correlated with each other, but each contributes to the stability of the amphipathic α-helix. More importantly, the combined effects of α-helical propensity and sidechain hydrophobicity at a ratio of about 2:1 had optimal correlation with α-helix stability. These results suggest that both α-helical propensity and sidechain hydrophobicity should be taken into consideration in the design of α-helical proteins with the desired stability.     

Identification of the lipid droplet targeting domain of the Cidea protein

Cidea, the cell death-inducing DNA fragmentation factor-α-like effector (CIDE) domain-containing protein, is targeted to lipid droplets in mouse adipocytes, where it inhibits triglyceride hydrolysis and promotes lipid storage. In mice, Cidea may prevent lipolysis by binding and shielding lipid droplets from lipase association. Here we demonstrate that human Cidea localizes with lipid droplets in both adipocyte and nonadipocyte cell lines, and we ascribe specific functions to its protein domains. Expression of full-length Cidea in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells or COS-1 cells increases total cellular triglyceride and strikingly alters the morphology of lipid droplets by enhancing their size and reducing their number. Remarkably, both lipid droplet binding and increased triglyceride accumulation are also elicited by expression of only the carboxy-terminal 104 amino acids, indicating this small domain directs lipid droplet targeting and triglyceride shielding. However, unlike the full-length protein, expression of the carboxy-terminus causes clustering of small lipid droplets but not the formation of large droplets, identifying a novel function of the N terminus. Furthermore, human Cidea promotes lipid storage via lipolysis inhibition, as the expression of human Cidea in fully differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes causes a significant decrease in basal glycerol release. Taken together, these data indicate that the carboxy-terminal domain of Cidea directs lipid droplet targeting, lipid droplet clustering, and triglyceride accumulation, whereas the amino terminal domain is required for Cidea-mediated development of enlarged lipid droplets.     

Initial structural and dynamic characterization of the M2 protein transmembrane and amphipathic helices in lipid bilayers

Amphipathic helices in membrane proteins that interact with the hydrophobic/hydrophilic interface of the lipid bilayer have been difficult to structurally characterize. Here, the backbone structure and orientation of an amphipathic helix in the full-length M2 protein from influenza A virus has been characterized. The protein has been studied in hydrated DMPC/DMPG lipid bilayers above the gel to liquid-crystalline phase transition temperature by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Characteristic PISA (Polar Index Slant Angle) wheels reflecting helical wheels have been observed in uniformly aligned bilayer preparations of both uniformly 15N labeled and amino acid specific labeled M2 samples. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange studies have shown the very slow exchange of some residues in the amphipathic helix and more rapid exchange for the transmembrane helix. These latter results clearly suggest the presence of an aqueous pore. A variation in exchange rate about the transmembrane helical axis provides additional support for this claim and suggests that motions occur about the helical axes in this tetramer to expose the entire backbone to the pore.     

Structure of the human RAD17–RFC clamp loader and 9–1–1 checkpoint clamp bound to a dsDNA–ssDNA junction

The RAD9–RAD1–HUS1 (9–1–1) clamp forms one half of the DNA damage checkpoint system that signals the presence of substantial regions of single-stranded DNA arising from replication fork collapse or resection of DNA double strand breaks. Loaded at the 5′-recessed end of a dsDNA–ssDNA junction by the RAD17–RFC clamp loader complex, the phosphorylated C-terminal tail of the RAD9 subunit of 9–1–1 engages with the mediator scaffold TOPBP1 which in turn activates the ATR kinase, localised through the interaction of its constitutive partner ATRIP with RPA-coated ssDNA. Using cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) we have determined the structure of a complex of the human RAD17–RFC clamp loader bound to human 9–1–1, engaged with a dsDNA–ssDNA junction. The structure answers the key questions of how RAD17 confers specificity for 9–1–1 over PCNA, and how the clamp loader specifically recognises the recessed 5′ DNA end and fixes the orientation of 9–1–1 on the ssDNA.