Polyadenylation regulates the stability of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial RNAs

Polyadenylation of RNAs plays a critical role in modulating rates of RNA turnover and ultimately in controlling gene expression in all systems examined to date. In mitochondria, the precise mechanisms by which RNAs are degraded, including the role of polyadenylation, are not well understood. Our previous in organello pulse-chase experiments suggest that poly(A) tails stimulate degradation of mRNAs in the mitochondria of the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma brucei (Militello, K. T., and Read, L. K. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 731-742). In this report, we developed an in vitro assay to directly examine the effects of specific 3'-sequences on RNA degradation. We found that a salt-extracted mitochondrial membrane fraction preferentially degraded polyadenylated mitochondrially and non-mitochondrially encoded RNAs over their non-adenylated counterparts. A poly(A) tail as short as 5 nucleotides was sufficient to stimulate rapid degradation, although an in vivo tail length of 20 adenosines supported the most rapid decay. A poly(U) extension did not promote rapid RNA degradation, and RNA turnover was slowed by the addition of uridine residues to the poly(A) tail. To stimulate degradation, the poly(A) element must be located at the 3' terminus of the RNA. Finally, we demonstrate that degradation of polyadenylated RNAs occurs in the 3' to 5' direction through the action of a hydrolytic exonuclease. These experiments demonstrate that the poly(A) tail can act as a cis-acting element to facilitate degradation of T. brucei mitochondrial mRNAs.     

PPR polyadenylation factor defines mitochondrial mRNA identity and stability in trypanosomes

In Trypanosoma brucei, most mitochondrial mRNAs undergo internal changes by RNA editing and 3′ end modifications. The temporally separated and functionally distinct modifications are manifested by adenylation prior to editing, and by post‐editing extension of a short A‐tail into a long A/U‐heteropolymer. The A‐tail stabilizes partially and fully edited mRNAs, while the A/U‐tail enables mRNA binding to the ribosome. Here, we identify an essential pentatricopeptide repeat‐containing RNA binding protein, kinetoplast polyadenylation factor 3 (KPAF3), and demonstrate its role in protecting pre‐mRNA against degradation by the processome. We show that KPAF3 recruits KPAP1 poly(A) polymerase to the 3′ terminus, thus leading to pre‐mRNA stabilization, or decay depending on the occurrence and extent of editing. In vitro, KPAF3 stimulates KPAP1 activity and inhibits mRNA uridylation by RET1 TUTase. Our findings indicate that KPAF3 selectively directs pre‐mRNA toward adenylation rather than uridylation, which is a default post‐trimming modification characteristic of ribosomal and guide RNAs. As a quality control mechanism, KPAF3 binding ensures that mRNAs entering the editing pathway are adenylated and, therefore, competent for post‐editing A/U‐tailing and translational activation.     

Degradation of hypomodified tRNA(iMet) in vivo involves RNA-dependent ATPase activity of the DExH helicase Mtr4p

Effective turnover of many incorrectly processed RNAs in yeast, including hypomodified tRNA(iMet), requires the TRAMP complex, which appends a short poly(A) tail to RNA designated for decay. The poly(A) tail stimulates degradation by the exosome. The TRAMP complex contains the poly(A) polymerase Trf4p, the RNA-binding protein Air2p, and the DExH RNA helicase Mtr4p. The role of Mtr4p in RNA degradation processes involving the TRAMP complex has been unclear. Here we show through a genetic analysis that MTR4 is required for degradation but not for polyadenylation of hypomodified tRNA(iMet). A suppressor of the trm6-504 mutation in the tRNA m(1)A58 methyltransferase (Trm6p/Trm61p), which causes a reduced level of tRNA(iMet), was mapped to MTR4. This mtr4-20 mutation changed a single amino acid in the conserved helicase motif VI of Mtr4p. The mutation stabilizes hypomodified tRNA(iMet) in vivo but has no effect on TRAMP complex stability or polyadenylation activity in vivo or in vitro. We further show that purified recombinant Mtr4p displays RNA-dependent ATPase activity and unwinds RNA duplexes with a 3'-to-5' polarity in an ATP-dependent fashion. Unwinding and RNA-stimulated ATPase activities are strongly reduced in the recombinant mutant Mtr4-20p, suggesting that these activities of Mtr4p are critical for degradation of polyadenylated hypomodified tRNA(iMet).     

Kinetoplastid RNA editing: in vitro formation of cytochrome b gRNA-mRNA chimeras from synthetic substrate RNAs.

RNA editing in the kinetoplastid Trypanosoma brucei results in the addition and deletion of uridine residues within several mitochondrial mRNAs. The site and number of uridines added appears to be directed by small (approximately 70 nt) guide RNAs (gRNAs), which can base pair to the edited sequences. We examined reactions involving synthetic cytochrome b (CYb) gRNA and pre-edited mRNA in vitro. A major product of the in vitro reaction is a chimeric RNA molecule containing both gRNA and mRNA sequences. Formation of the CYb gRNA-mRNA chimera was specific, since such molecules did not accumulate when either the gRNA or mRNA was substituted with control RNAs. The reaction required a free 3' hydroxyl on the gRNA and was unaffected by capping of the gRNA's 5' end. Direct RNA sequencing indicated that the CYb gRNA is covalently linked via its 3' poly(U) tail to one of the editing sites on the CYb mRNA. These results suggest that the U's added during editing are donated by the poly(U) tail of a gRNA via a chimeric gRNA-mRNA intermediate.     

Partially edited RNAs are intermediates of RNA editing in plant mitochondria

RNA editing in flowering plant mitochondria addresses several hundred specific C nucleotides in individual sequence contexts in mRNAs and tRNAs. Many of the in vivo steady state RNAs are edited at some sites but not at others. It is still unclear whether such incompletely edited RNAs can either be completed or are aborted. To learn more about the dynamics of the substrate recognition process, we investigated in vitro RNA editing at a locus in the atp4 mRNA where three editing sites are clustered within four nucleotides. A single cis-element of about 20 nucleotides serves in the recognition of at least two sites. Competition with this sequence element suppresses in vitro editing. Surprisingly, unedited and edited competitors are equally effective. Experiments with partially pre-edited substrates indicate that indeed the editing status of a substrate RNA does not affect the binding affinity of the specificity factor(s). RNA molecules in which all editing sites are substituted by either A or G still compete, confirming that editing site recognition can occur independently of the actual editing site. These results show that incompletely edited mRNAs can be substrates for further rounds of RNA editing, resolving a long debated question.     

Trypanosoma brucei guide RNA poly(U) tail formation is stabilized by cognate mRNA

Guide RNAs (gRNAs) are small RNAs that provide specificity for uridine addition and deletion during mRNA editing in trypanosomes. Terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) adds uridines to pre-mRNAs during RNA editing and adds a poly(U) tail to the 3' end of gRNAs. The poly(U) tail may stabilize the association of gRNAs with cognate mRNA during editing. Both TUTase and gRNAs associate with two ribonucleoprotein complexes, I (19S) and II (35S to 40S). Complex II is believed to be the fully assembled active editing complex, since it contains pre-edited mRNA and enzymes thought necessary for editing. Purification of TUTase from mitochondrial extracts resulted in the identification of two chromatographically distinct TUTase activities. Stable single-uridine addition to different substrate RNAs is performed by the 19S complex, despite the presence of a uridine-specific 3' exonuclease within this complex. Multiple uridines are added to substrate RNAs by a 10S particle that may be an unstable subunit of complex I lacking the uridine-specific 3' exonuclease. Multiple uridines could be stably added onto gRNAs by complex I when the cognate mRNA is present. We propose a model in which the purine-rich region of the cognate mRNA protects the uridine tail from a uridine exonuclease activity that is present within the complex. To test this model, we have mutated the purine-rich region of the pre-mRNA to abolish base-pairing interaction with the poly(U) tail of the gRNA. This RNA fails to protect the uridine tail of the gRNA from exoribonucleolytic trimming and is consistent with a role for the purine-rich region of the mRNA in gRNA maturation.