Sterols of Amphidinium species in the Operculatum Clade: Predominance of cholesterol instead of Δ8(14) sterols previously considered Amphidinium-specific biomarkers

The dinoflagellates Amphidinium carterae and Amphidinium corpulentum have been previously characterized as having Δ⁸⁽¹⁴⁾-nuclear unsaturated 4α-methyl-5α-cholest-8(14)-en-3β-ol (C_28:1) and 4α-methyl-5α-ergosta-8(14),24(28)-dien-3β-ol (amphisterol; C_29:2) as predominant sterols, where they comprise approximately 80% of the total sterol composition. These two sterols have hence been considered as possible major sterol biomarkers for the genus. Here, we have examined the sterols of four recently identified species of Amphidinium (Amphidinium fijiense, Amphidinium magnum, Amphidinium theodori, and Amphidinium tomasii) that are closely related to Amphidinium operculatum as part of what is termed the Operculatum Clade to show that each species has its sterol composition dominated by the common dinoflagellate sterol cholesterol (cholest-5-en-3β-ol; C_27:1), which is found in many other dinoflagellate genera, rather than Δ⁸⁽¹⁴⁾ sterols. While the Δ⁸⁽¹⁴⁾ sterols 4α-methyl-5α-cholest-8(14)-en-3β-ol and 4α,23,24-trimethyl-5α-cholest-8(14),22E-dien-3β-ol (C_30:2) were present as minor sterols along with another common dinoflagellate sterol, 4α,23,24-trimethyl-5α-cholest-22E-en-3β-ol (dinosterol; C_30:1), in some of these four species, amphisterol was not conclusively observed. From a chemotaxonomic perspective, while this does reinforce the genus Amphidinium's ability to produce Δ⁸⁽¹⁴⁾ sterols, albeit here as minor sterols, these results demonstrate that caution should be used when considering Δ⁸⁽¹⁴⁾ sterols, especially amphisterol, as Amphidinium-specific biomarkers within these species where cholesterol is the predominant sterol.     

Sterols of Testudodinium testudo (formerly Amphidinium testudo): Production of the Δ8(14) sterol gymnodinosterol and chemotaxonomic relationship to the Kareniaceae

Testudodinium testudo is a peridinin-containing dinoflagellate recently renamed from Amphidinium testudo. While T. testudo has been shown via phylogenetic analysis of small subunit ribosomal RNA genes to reside in a clade separate from the genus Amphidinium, it does possess morphological features similar to Amphidinium sensu stricto. Previous studies of Amphidinium carterae and Amphidinium corpulentum have found the sterols to be enriched in Δ⁸⁽¹⁴⁾ sterols, such as 4α-methyl-5α-ergosta-8(14),24(28)-dien-3β-ol (amphisterol), uncommon to most other dinoflagellate taxa and thus considered possible biomarkers for the genus Amphidinium. Here, we provide an examination of the sterols of T. testudo and show they are dominated not by amphisterol, but rather by a different Δ⁸⁽¹⁴⁾ sterol, (24R)-4α-methyl-5α-ergosta-8(14),22-dien-3β-ol (gymnodinosterol), previously thought to be a major sterol only within the Kareniaceae genera Karenia, Karlodinium, and Takayama. Also found to be present at low levels were 4α-methyl-5α-ergosta-8,14,22-trien-3β-ol, a sterol previously observed in Karenia brevis to be an intermediate in the production of gymnodinosterol, and cholesterol, a sterol common to many other dinoflagellates. The presence of gymnodinosterol in T. testudo is the first report of this sterol as the sole major sterol in a dinoflagellate outside of the Kareniaceae. The implication of this chemotaxonomic relationship to the Kareniaceae is discussed.     

Mono- and digalactosyldiacylglycerol composition of dinoflagellates. VI. Biochemical and genomic comparison of galactolipid biosynthesis between Chromera velia (Chromerida), a photosynthetic alveolate with red algal plastid ancestry,and the dinoflagellate,Lingulodinium polyedrum

Chromera velia is a recently discovered, photosynthetic, free-living alveolate that is the closest free-living relative to non-photosynthetic apicomplexan parasites. Most plastids, regardless of their origin, have membranes composed chiefly of two galactolipids, mono- and digalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG and DGDG, respectively). Because of the hypothesized shared red algal origin between the plastids of C. velia and dinoflagellates, our primary objectives were to examine how growth temperature affects MGDG and DGDG composition via positive-ion electrospray/mass spectrometry (ESI/MS) and positive ion/electrospray/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (ESI/MS/MS), and to examine galactolipid biosynthetic genes to determine if shared ancestry translates into shared MGDG and DGDG composition. When growing at 20°C, C. velia produces eicosapentaenoic acid-rich 20:5(n-3)/20:5(n-3) (sn-1/sn-2) MGDG and 20:5(n-3)/20:5(n-3) DGDG as its primary galactolipids, with relative percentage compositions of approximately 35 and 60%, respectively. At 30°C these are lessened by approximately 5 and 8%, respectively, by the corresponding production of 20:5/20:4 forms of these lipids. The presence of 20:5 at the sn-1 position is similar to what has been observed previously in a cluster of peridinin-containing dinoflagellates, but the presence of 20:5(n-3) at the sn-2 position is extremely rare. Thus, the forms of MGDG and DGDG in C. velia displayed similarities and differences to what has been observed in peridinin-containing dinoflagellates, such as Lingulodinium polyedrum, which produces 20:5/18:5 and 20:5/18:4 as the major forms of MGDG and DGDG. We develop conceptual models from the galactolipids observed and galactolipid-relevant gene annotations to explain the presence of polyunsaturated fatty acid-containing MGDG and DGDG in both L. polyedrum and C. velia.     

A revision of the Dip lop salts group of dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) based on material from the British Isles

SEM has made possible a detailed re-examination of the thecal plates of marine dinoflagellates belonging to the Diplopsalis group which have been collected in an extensive survey of the seas around the British Isles. Six genera are recognized: Diplopsalis, Diplopsalopsis, Dissodium, Oblea, Zygabikodinium and die new genus and species Boreadinium pisiformis Dodge 8c Hermes. The confused taxonomic history of the group is discussed, the valid species are listed and a key for the identification of the genera is given.     

PHAGOTROPHY IN THE FRESHWATER,PHOTOSYNTHETIC DINOFLAGELLATE AMPHIDINIUM CRYOPHILUM1

The cold-water, photosynthetic dinoflagellate Amphidinium cryophilum Wedemayer, Wilcox & Graham feeds phagotrophically on other dinoflagellate species. Food is ingested through a feeding tube, termed here the “phagopod,” which extends from the antapex. The peduncle of this organism plays no observable role in the feeding process. The phagopod is essentially a hollow cylinder composed electron-opaque material that is possibly deposited on a membrane. No Amphidinium cytoplasmic components, including microtubules or other cytoskeletal elements, were observed in the phagopod. Prefeeding cells aggregate, in small clumps near prey organisms with their phagopods extended. Eventually some cells commence feeding, first inserting the phagopod through the prey cell-covering and then slowly, over a period of 10 min or more, drawing cytoplasm through the phagopod and into a nascent food vacuole. Both light and electron microscopy suggest that one or more prey cell amphiesmal membranes remain intact during the feeding process. Upon completion of feeding, the Amphidinium cell swims off with a prominent food vacuole in the hypocone, leaving at least part of the phagopod attached to the prey cell. Phagotrophy in A. cryophilum seems to vary with light intensity. At low light intensities, cells feed phagotrophically and are nearly colorless, whereas at high light levels they feed much less frequently, if at all, and are brightly pigmented.