Out-of-field organ doses and associated risk of cancer development following radiation therapy with photons

Innovations in cancer treatment have contributed to the improved survival rate of these patients. Radiotherapy is one of the main options for cancer management nowadays. High doses of ionizing radiation are usually delivered to the tumor site with high energy photon beams. However, the therapeutic radiation exposure may lead to second cancer induction. Moreover, the introduction of intensity-modulated radiation therapy over the last decades has increased the radiation dose to out-of-field organs compared to that from conventional irradiation. The increased organ doses might result in elevated probabilities for developing secondary malignancies to critical organs outside the treatment volume. The organ-specific dosimetry is considered necessary for the theoretical second cancer risk assessment and the proper analysis of data derived from epidemiological reports. This study reviews the methods employed for the measurement and calculation of out-of-field organ doses from exposure to photons and/or neutrons. The strengths and weaknesses of these dosimetric approaches are described in detail. This is followed by a review of the epidemiological data associated with out-of-field cancer risks. Previously published theoretical cancer risk estimates for adult and pediatric patients undergoing radiotherapy with conventional and advanced techniques are presented. The methodology for the theoretical prediction of the probability of carcinogenesis to out-of-field sites and the limitations of this approach are discussed. The article also focuses on the factors affecting the magnitude of the probability for developing radiotherapy-induced malignancies. The restriction of out-of-field doses and risks through the use of different types of shielding equipment is presented.     

Tumour size can have an impact on the outcomes of epidemiological studies on second cancers after radiotherapy

Obtaining a correct dose–response relationship for radiation-induced cancer after radiotherapy presents a major challenge for epidemiological studies. The purpose of this paper is to gain a better understanding of the associated uncertainties. To accomplish this goal, some aspects of an epidemiological study on breast cancer following radiotherapy of Hodgkin’s disease were simulated with Monte Carlo methods. It is demonstrated that although the doses to the breast volume are calculated by one treatment plan, the locations and sizes of the induced secondary breast tumours can be simulated and, based on these simulated locations and sizes, the absorbed doses at the site of tumour incidence can also be simulated. For the simulations of point dose at tumour site, linear and non-linear mechanistic models which predict risk of cancer induction as a function of dose were applied randomly to the treatment plan. These simulations provided for each second tumour and each simulated tumour size the predicted dose. The predicted-dose–response-characteristic from the analysis of the simulated epidemiological study was analysed. If a linear dose–response relationship for cancer induction was applied to calculate the theoretical doses at the simulated tumour sites, all Monte-Carlo realizations of the epidemiological study yielded strong evidence for a resulting linear risk to predicted-dose–response. However, if a non-linear dose–response of cancer induction was applied to calculate the theoretical doses, the Monte Carlo simulated epidemiological study resulted in a non-linear risk to predicted-dose–response relationship only if the tumour size was small (<?1.5 cm). If the diagnosed breast tumours exceeded an average diameter of 1.5 cm, an applied non-linear theoretical-dose–response relationship for second cancer falsely resulted in strong evidence for a linear predicted-dose relationship from the epidemiological study realizations. For a typical distribution of breast cancer sizes, the model selection probability for a resulting predicted-dose linear model was 61% although a non-linear theoretical-dose–response relationship for cancer induction had been applied. The results of this study, therefore, provide evidence that the shapes of epidemiologically obtained dose–response relationships for cancer induction can be biased by the finite size of the diagnosed second tumour, even though the epidemiological study was done correctly.     

Exploring Boron Neutron Capture Therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) is a radiotherapy that combines biological targeting and high LET radiation. It consists in the enrichment of tumour with ¹⁰B and in the successive irradiation of the target with low energy neutrons producing charged particles that mainly cause non-repairable damages to the cells.The feasibility to treat Non Small Cells Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with BNCT was explored. This paper proposes a new approach to determine treatment plans, introducing the possibility to choose the irradiation start and duration to maximize the tumour dose. A Tumour Control Probability (TCP) suited for lung BNCT as well as other high dose radiotherapy schemes was also introduced.Treatment plans were evaluated in localized and disseminated lung tumours. Semi-ideal and real energy spectra beams were employed to assess the best energy range and the performance of non-tailored neutron sources for lung tumour treatments.The optimal neutron energy is within [500 eV−3 keV], lower than the 10 keV suggested for the treatment of deep-seated tumours in the brain. TCPs higher than 0.6 and up to 0.95 are obtained for all cases.Conclusions drawn from [Suzuki et al., Int Canc Conf J 1 (4) (2012) 235–238] supporting the feasibility of BNCT for shallow lung tumours are confirmed, however discussions favouring the treatment of deeper lesions and disseminated disease are also opened. Since BNCT gives the possibility to deliver a safe and potentially effective treatment for NSCLC, it can be considered a suitable alternative for patients with few or no treatment options.     

A software tool for organ-specific second cancer risk assessment from exposure to therapeutic doses

The aim of this study was the development of a software tool (SCRcalc) for the automatic estimation of the patient- and organ-specific cancer risk due to radiotherapy. SCRcalc was developed using the Python 3.8.7 programming language. It incorporates equations and parameters of mechanistic models for the calculation of the organ equivalent dose (OED), the excess absolute risk (EA R) and the lifetime attributable risk (LA R) of carcinogenesis for various organs due to radiotherapy. Data from differential dose-volume histograms, as defined by a treatment planning system, could be automatically inserted into the program. Eighteen different cancer risk estimates for various organs were performed of patients subjected to radiation therapy with conventional and modulated techniques. These software estimates were compared with manual calculations. SCRcalc was developed as a standalone executable program without any dependencies. It enables direct estimations of the OED and LAR for various organs at risk. An important aspect of the software is that it does not require pre-processing of the DVH data. No differences were found between the SCRcalc results and those derived from manual calculations. The newly developed software offers the possibility to medical physicists and radiation oncologists to directly estimate the probability of radiotherapy-induced secondary malignancies for various organs at risk.     

Radiobiological models in prediction of radiation cardiotoxicity

Coronary disease induced by previous radiotherapy is the most common cause of death among patients treated with radiotherapy for cancer. Risk factors that may affect the frequency and intensity of radiotherapy’s cardiac toxicity are primarily the radiation dose and the volume of the heart exposed to radiation. The prolonged survival time of patients after radiotherapy, but also the intensive development of modern radiotherapy techniques results in the necessity of precise estimation of both tumor control probability, and the risk of normal tissue damage, thus the models describing the probability of complications in normal tissues have also been developed. The response from the cardiovascular system to high-dose radiation is known and associated with a pro-inflammatory response. However, the effect of low doses may be completely different because it induces an anti-inflammatory response. Also, there is no unambiguous answer to the question of whether RICD is a deterministic effect. Moreover, there is a lack of literature data on the use of known radiobiological models to assess the risk of cardiovascular complications. The models described are general and concerns any healthy tissue. Therefore, when planning treatment for patients, particular attention should be paid to the dose and area of ​​the heart to be irradiated.     

Why are dendritic cells central to cancer immunotherapy?

Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy is rapidly emerging as a viable alternative to radiation or chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer. The resurgence of interest in cancer immunotherapy reflects the promising results that have been obtained in both animal models and early clinical trials with the DC-based approach. Here I suggest that this optimism is justified because the efficient capture and presentation of antigens by DCs is central to the induction of an immune response. I argue that the mechanism by which DCs capture antigen suggests that the immune system might actually be 'blind' to tumours, thereby challenging the theory of immune surveillance.     

Peripheral organ doses from radiotherapy for heterotopic ossification of non-hip joints: Is there a risk for radiation-induced malignancies?

Radiotherapy, used for heterotopic ossification (HO) management, may increase radiation risk to patients. This study aimed to determine the peripheral dose to radiosensitive organs and the associated cancer risks due to radiotherapy of HO in common non-hip joints. A Monte Carlo model of a medical linear accelerator combined with a mathematical phantom representing an average adult patient were employed to simulate radiotherapy for HO with standard AP and PA fields in the regions of shoulder, elbow and knee. Radiation dose to all out-of-field radiosensitive organs defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection was calculated. Cancer induction risk was estimated using organ-specific risk coefficients. Organ dose change with increased field dimensions was also evaluated. Radiation therapy for HO with a 7 Gy target dose in the sites of shoulder, elbow and knee, resulted in the following equivalent organ dose ranges of 0.85–62 mSv, 0.28–1.6 mSv and 0.04–1.6 mSv, respectively. Respective ranges for cancer risk were 0–5.1, 0–0.6 and 0–1.3 cases per 10⁴ persons. Increasing the field size caused an average increase of peripheral doses by 15–20%. Individual organ dose increase depends upon the primary treatment site and the distance between organ of interest and treatment volume. Relatively increased risks of more than 1 case per 10,000 patients were found for skin, breast and thyroid malignancies after treatment in the region of shoulder and for skin cancer following elbow irradiation. The estimated risk for inducing any other malignant disease ranges from negligible to low.     

胸部肿瘤放射治疗的研究进展

随着物理学、计算机技术、影像学的发展,放射治疗方法在最近几十年也有了显著的进步与发展,而放疗技术是治疗癌症行之有效的方法。本文主要综述了胸部肿瘤的放射治疗最新的进展,其中包括乳腺癌、肺癌、食道癌和纵膈肿瘤的放射治疗。细胞对放射线的敏感性在分裂期最高,在DNA合成期其敏感性最低。放射疗法既不损伤周围正常组织,仅仅对异常增殖的癌肿给予大量的杀伤,同时机体又再次尽可能发挥最大的调节功能。伴随胸部肿瘤放疗技术的进步,对治疗这些肿瘤有非常重要的临床意义。     

Issues and epidemiological evidence regarding radiation-induced thyroid cancer.

The available information on the induction of thyroid cancer in humans by ionizing radiation is summarized and weaknesses or gaps in assessing risk are identified. Issues to be addressed include: average estimates of thyroid cancer risk from external irradiation, the effects of age on thyroid cancer induction, shape of the dose-response curve for acute irradiation, magnitude of risk at low doses, effects of dose fractionation or dose protraction, the relative effectiveness of iodine-131 (131I) in inducing thyroid cancer compared to external radiation, the temporal course of radiogenic thyroid cancer risk, mortality caused by thyroid cancer, host-susceptibility factors for radiogenic thyroid cancer, and biological factors in risk. It is concluded that the most important needs are to obtain more information on thyroid cancer risks following low-level or highly fractionated radiation exposures and following 131I exposure in children.     

Role of modern radiation therapy in early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: A young radiation oncologists’ perspective

The role of radiotherapy is well established in combined modality programs for early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma, but still debated with regards to late toxicity issues. Modern radiotherapy prescribing attitudes include lower doses and smaller fields, together with the implementation of sophisticated and dedicated delivery techniques. Aim of this review is to briefly discuss the current role of radiotherapy in this field and the potential future developments. Major trials conducted in recent years in early stage Hodgkin's lymphoma are critically reviewed and discussed with a focus on radiotherapy-related issues and with an attention to current treatment options by a “young” radiation oncologists’ perspective.     

Postoperative radiotherapy and late mortality: evidence from the Cancer Research Campaign trial for early breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE--To identify any excess mortality caused by adjuvant radiotherapy for early breast cancer. DESIGN--Prospective randomised clinical trial. Two thousand subjects needed for study to have a 90% chance of detecting a difference in survival rate of 7% with 95% significance. Patients were followed up until June 1988, giving follow up of 158-216 months. SETTING--A multicentre trial mainly drawing patients from centres in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS--2800 Women presenting with clinical stage I or II carcinoma of the breast from June 1970 to April 1975. INTERVENTIONS--One group of women (n = 1376) had simple mastectomy followed by immediate postoperative radiotherapy (1320 to 1510 rets). The remaining women (n = 1424) had simple mastectomy with subsequent careful observation of the axilla, radiotherapy being delayed until there was obvious progression or recurrence of disease locally. END POINT--Increased mortality in patients treated with radiotherapy from causes other than breast cancer. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Survival was measured from time of first treatment to death or last follow up. Deaths from any cause and from specified causes were counted as events. Comparison over the whole follow up showed a slight excess mortality in the group treated with radiotherapy (relative risk 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.94 to 1.15). The relative risk of death from breast cancer was 0.97 (0.87 to 1.08) but that of death from other causes was 1.37 (1.09 to 1.72), the increase mainly being in women who had had tumours of the left breast (1.61 (1.17 to 2.24)) and had been treated with orthovoltage (1.85 (1.27 to 2.71)). Analysis of causes of death after five years showed a relative risk of 2.11 (1.25 to 3.59) for new malignancies and of 1.65 (1.05 to 2.58) for cardiac disease, the increase in cardiac mortality being most pronounced in patients who had had tumours of the left breast and whose treatment had included orthovoltage radiation (relative risk 2.67 (1.28 to 5.55)). CONCLUSIONS--Adjuvant radiotherapy after simple mastectomy for early breast cancer produces a small excess late mortality from other cancers and cardiac disease. The risk has to be balanced against the higher risk of local recurrence when immediate postoperative radiotherapy is not given. The balance has to be assessed for each patient, and for many patients radiotherapy will still be desirable in the initial treatment of their early breast cancer.     

Is the risk for secondary cancers after proton therapy enhanced distal to the Planning Target Volume? A two-case report with possible explanations

It is often assumed that radiation-induced secondary cancer after proton therapy forms preferentially close to the distal fall-off of the spread-out Bragg peak because of an increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) with regard to cancer induction of low-energy protons. In this study we analyze to what extent dose gradients distal to the Planning Target Volume (PTV) may, independently from the RBE, contribute to enhanced radiation carcinogenesis. The study is based on two dogs which, out of 30 dogs treated with proton therapy at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), developed a secondary cancer. Both dogs were originally diagnosed and treated for a fibrosarcoma and developed an osteosarcoma 48 and almost 60 months, respectively, after radiotherapy. From the dose distributions of the initial radiotherapy for both dogs three-dimensional maps of secondary cancer complication probability (SCCP) were computed. The SCCP maps were analyzed in the regions where the dogs developed a secondary cancer. The SCCP maps showed an enhanced risk in the regions of the femur where the secondary cancers were detected, as compared to the SCCP of the total femur. Excess risk of radiation-induced cancer at the distal part of proton radiation fields can thus be explained using SCCP calculations on the basis of the physical dose distributions. Therefore, the occurrence of secondary cancer close to the distal dose gradients of proton therapy is not necessarily due to an increased RBE of low-energy protons. More extensive studies based on more patients will be necessary to further elucidate the factors influencing the development of secondary tumors.     

Bystander effects and radiotherapy

Radiation-induced bystander effects are defined as biological effects expressed after irradiation by cells whose nuclei have not been directly irradiated. These effects include DNA damage, chromosomal instability, mutation, and apoptosis. There is considerable evidence that ionizing radiation affects cells located near the site of irradiation, which respond individually and collectively as part of a large interconnected web. These bystander signals can alter the dynamic equilibrium between proliferation, apoptosis, quiescence or differentiation. The aim of this review is to examine the most important biological effects of this phenomenon with regard to areas of major interest in radiotherapy. Such aspects include radiation-induced bystander effects during the cell cycle under hypoxic conditions when administering fractionated modalities or combined radio-chemotherapy. Other relevant aspects include individual variation and genetics in toxicity of bystander factors and normal tissue collateral damage. In advanced radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the high degree of dose conformity to the target volume reduces the dose and, therefore, the risk of complications, to normal tissues. However, significant doses can accumulate out-of-field due to photon scattering and this may impact cellular response in these regions. Protons may offer a solution to reduce out-of-field doses. The bystander effect has numerous associated phenomena, including adaptive response, genomic instability, and abscopal effects. Also, the bystander effect can influence radiation protection and oxidative stress. It is essential that we understand the mechanisms underlying the bystander effect in order to more accurately assess radiation risk and to evaluate protocols for cancer radiotherapy.     

A systems-based mathematical modelling framework for investigating the effect of drugs on solid tumours

Background and Purpose

Most information on the dose-response of radiation-induced cancer is derived from data on the A-bomb survivors. Since, for radiation protection purposes, the dose span of main interest is between zero and one Gy, the analysis of the A-bomb survivors is usually focused on this range. However, estimates of cancer risk for doses larger than one Gy are becoming more important for radiotherapy patients. Therefore in this work, emphasis is placed on doses relevant for radiotherapy with respect to radiation induced solid cancer.

Materials and methods

For various organs and tissues the analysis of cancer induction was extended by an attempted combination of the linear-no-threshold model from the A-bomb survivors in the low dose range and the cancer risk data of patients receiving radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease in the high dose range. The data were fitted using organ equivalent dose (OED) calculated for a group of different dose-response models including a linear model, a model including fractionation, a bell-shaped model and a plateau-dose-response relationship.

Results

The quality of the applied fits shows that the linear model fits best colon, cervix and skin. All other organs are best fitted by the model including fractionation indicating that the repopulation/repair ability of tissue is neither 0 nor 100% but somewhere in between. Bone and soft tissue sarcoma were fitted well by all the models. In the low dose range beyond 1 Gy sarcoma risk is negligible. For increasing dose, sarcoma risk increases rapidly and reaches a plateau at around 30 Gy.

Conclusions

In this work OED for various organs was calculated for a linear, a bell-shaped, a plateau and a mixture between a bell-shaped and plateau dose-response relationship for typical treatment plans of Hodgkin's disease patients. The model parameters (α and R) were obtained by a fit of the dose-response relationships to these OED data and to the A-bomb survivors. For any three-dimensional inhomogenous dose distribution, cancer risk can be compared by computing OED using the coefficients obtained in this work.     

Radiation injury: some aspects of the oncogenic effects.

The late effects or irradiation stem from cell killing, mutation, and malignant transformation. Cancer is the major somatic late effect of exposure to low dose levels of radiation, and estimates of risk of cancer in man after irradiation are based entirely on human experience. The data for dose-response relationships for the induction of tumors by external irradiation in man have been obtained from a single exposure or a small number of exposures delivered at high dose rates. In contrast, exposure to environmental irradiation is mainly protracted over a long period of time and is delivered at a low dose rate. As yet no allowance has been made for the effect of protraction of the exposure time in estimating the risk of cancer, although an adjustment has been made in the case of estimates of genetic risk. Incidence of tumors has been the only parameter used for risk estimates, but latent period and degree of malignancy, which are probably both dose and dose-rate dependent, influence the nature of the risk from radiation. As the knowledge about the effects of low-level radiation has been accumulated and assimilated over the last 70 years, so has the concern for reasonable standards of safety. There are still problems in the estimation of radiation risks, but at least many of the relevant questions can now be framed. The problems of estimating risks for chemical carcinogens are clearly greater, but the experience gained from radiation studies should help in the design of the necessary experiments.     

Autophagy upregulation by inhibitors of caspase-3 and mTOR enhances radiotherapy in a mouse model of lung cancer

Autophagy has been reported to be increased in irradiated cancer cells resistant to various apoptotic stimuli. We therefore hypothesized that induction of autophagy via mTOR inhibition enhances radiosensitization in apoptosis-inhibited H460 lung cancer cells in vitro and in a lung cancer xenograft model. To test this hypothesis, combinations of Z-DEVD (caspase-3 inhibitor), RAD001 (mTOR inhibitor) and irradiation were tested in cell and mouse models. The combination of Z-DEVD and RAD001 more potently radiosensitized H460 cells than individual treatment alone. The enhancement in radiation response was not only evident in clonogenic survival assays, but also was demonstrated through markedly reduced tumor growth, cellular proliferation (Ki67 staining), apoptosis (TUNEL staining), and angiogenesis (vWF staining) in vivo. Additionally, upregulation of autophagy as measured by increased GFP-LC3-tagged autophagosome formation accompanied the noted radiosensitization in vitro and in vivo. The greatest induction of autophagy and associated radiation toxicity was exhibited in the tri-modality treatment group. Autophagy marker, LC-3-II, was reduced by 3-methyladenine (3-MA), a known inhibitor of autophagy, but further increased by the addition of lysosomal protease inhibitors (pepstatin A and E64d), demonstrating that there is autophagic induction through type III PI3 kinase during the combined therapy. Knocking down of ATG5 and beclin-1, two essential autophagic molecules, resulted in radiation resistance of lung cancer cells. Our report suggests that combined inhibition of apoptosis and mTOR during radiotherapy is a potential therapeutic strategy to enhance radiation therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.     

Risk of second bone sarcoma following childhood cancer: role of radiation therapy treatment

Bone sarcoma as a second malignancy is rare but highly fatal. The present knowledge about radiation-absorbed organ dose–response is insufficient to predict the risks induced by radiation therapy techniques. The objective of the present study was to assess the treatment-induced risk for bone sarcoma following a childhood cancer and particularly the related risk of radiotherapy. Therefore, a retrospective cohort of 4,171 survivors of a solid childhood cancer treated between 1942 and 1986 in France and Britain has been followed prospectively. We collected detailed information on treatments received during childhood cancer. Additionally, an innovative methodology has been developed to evaluate the dose–response relationship between bone sarcoma and radiation dose throughout this cohort. The median follow-up was 26 years, and 39 patients had developed bone sarcoma. It was found that the overall incidence was 45-fold higher [standardized incidence ratio 44.8, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 31.0–59.8] than expected from the general population, and the absolute excess risk was 35.1 per 100,000 person-years (95 % CI 24.0–47.1). The risk of bone sarcoma increased slowly up to a cumulative radiation organ absorbed dose of 15 Gy [hazard ratio (HR) = 8.2, 95 % CI 1.6–42.9] and then strongly increased for higher radiation doses (HR for 30 Gy or more 117.9, 95 % CI 36.5–380.6), compared with patients not treated with radiotherapy. A linear model with an excess relative risk per Gy of 1.77 (95 % CI 0.6213–5.935) provided a close fit to the data. These findings have important therapeutic implications: Lowering the radiation dose to the bones should reduce the incidence of secondary bone sarcomas. Other therapeutic solutions should be preferred to radiotherapy in bone sarcoma-sensitive areas.     

Estimation and reduction of the radiation dose to the fetus from external-beam radiotherapy

The appearance of a malignant disease during pregnancy is relatively rare. The use of external-beam radiation therapy is limited to non-pelvic tumors which are usually located above the diaphragm. However, supradiaphragmatic radiotherapy unavoidably exposes the fetus to secondary radiation due to head leakage, scatter from the machine and scatter produced inside the patient. This fetal exposure may be associated with an elevated risk for the development of deterministic harmful effects and/or carcinogenesis. The decision about the administration of radiotherapy in a pregnant patient is influenced by the fetal dose which must always be estimated before the patient’s treatment course. The methods employed for fetal dosimetry in external-beam radiotherapy are described in this review study. Direct dose measurements using thermoluminescent dosemeters or large ionization chambers placed on physical phantoms may be used. Monte Carlo simulations on computational phantoms may also provide accurate fetal dose calculations. The physical and/or computational phantoms need to simulate the full-scatter geometry of the pregnant patient. Typical fetal dose values attributable to radiation therapy for brain tumors, head and neck cancer, breast carcinoma and Hodgkin lymphoma at the first, second and third trimesters of gestation are presented. The effectiveness of different shielding devices for fetal dose reduction in radiotherapy is discussed. The effect of the dimensions and setup of the shielding material on the radiation dose received by the fetus is described. Moreover, practical methods for reducing the fetal dose by selecting the appropriate irradiation parameters are presented.     

Radiation-induced growth hormone deficiency

Deficiency of one or more anterior pituitary hormones may follow treatment with external irradiation when the hypothalamic-pituitary axis falls within the fields of irradiation. Hypopituitarism occurs in patients who receive radiation therapy for pituitary tumours, nasopharyngeal cancer and primary brain tumours, as well as in children who undergo prophylactic cranial irradiation for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, or total body irradiation for a variety of tumours and other diseases. The degree of pituitary hormonal deficit is related to the radiation dose received by the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Thus, after lower radiation doses isolated growth hormone deficiency ensues, whilst higher doses may produce hypopituitarism. The timing of onset of the radiation-induced pituitary hormone deficit is also dose-dependent. The main site of radiation damage is the hypothalamus rather than the pituitary, although the latter may be affected directly.