The residues of Ras and Rap proteins that determine their GAP specificities.

The oncogenic transformation of a normal fibroblast by mutated Ras genes can be reversed by overexpression of a Ras-related gene called Rap1A (or Krev1). Both Ras and Rap1A proteins are G proteins and appear to serve as signal transducers only in the GTP-bound form. Therefore, GAP1 and GAP3, which stimulate the intrinsic GTPase activities of normal Ras and Rap1A proteins, respectively, serve as attenuators of their signal transducing activities. In this paper, we describe the enzymatic properties of several mutated Rap1A and chimeric Ras/Rap1A (or -1B) proteins which lead to the following conclusions: (i) the GAP3-dependent activation of both Rap1A and -1B GTPases requires Gly12, but neither Thr61 nor Gln63; (ii) residues 64 to 70 of the Rap1 GTPases are sufficient to determine their specificities for GAP3; and (iii) residues 61 to 65 of the Ras GTPases are sufficient for determining their specificities for GAP1. Thus, the domains of the Ras or Rap1 proteins that determine whether their signals are attenuated by GAP1 or GAP3 are distinct from the N-terminal domain (residues 21 to 54) that determines whether their signals are oncogenic or antioncogenic. The Arg12 mutant of chimeric HaRas(1-54)/Rap1A(55-184) protein has been previously reported to be oncogenic (Zhang, K., Noda, M., Vass, W. C., Papageorge, A.G., and Lowy, D.R. (1990) Science 249, 162-165). In this paper, we show that the Val12 mutant of chimeric HaRas(1-54)/Rap1B(55-184) protein is also oncogenic, suggesting that the C-terminal geranylgeranylation of the Rap 1B protein can replace functionally the C-terminal farnesylation of the Ras protein to allow the G protein to be oncogenic.     

Rsr1 and Rap1 GTPases are activated by the same GTPase-activating protein and require threonine 65 for their activation

The Rsr1 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown to be essential for bud site selection (Bender, A., and Pringle, J. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 9976-9980). This protein of 272 amino acids shares approximately 50% sequence identity with both Ras and Rap GTPases. However, neither GTP binding nor GTPase activity of the Rsr1 protein has been reported. The Rsr1 protein shares with human Rap1 GTPases the four specific motifs, i.e. Gly-12, residues 32-40, Ala-59, and residues 64-70, that are required for GAP3-dependent activation of the Rap1 GTPases. In this paper we demonstrate that the intrinsic GTPase activity of the Rsr1 protein is stimulated by GAP3 purified from bovine brain cytosol. The Rsr1 GTPase is not activated by either GAP1 or GAP2 which are specific for the Ras and Rho GTPases, respectively. Thus, it appears that the Rsr1 GTPase is a new member of the Rap1 GTPase family. Replacement of Gly-12 by Val in the Rsr1 GTPase completely abolishes the GAP3-dependent activation. The chimeric GTPases, Ras(1-60)/Rsr1(61-168) and Rsr1(1-65)/Ras(66-189), are activated by GAP3 but not by GAP1. Replacement of Thr-65 by Ser in the latter chimeric GTPase completely abolishes the GAP3-dependent activation, indicating that Thr-65 is required for distinguishing GAP3 from GAP1. We have previously shown that Gln-61 and Ser-65 are sufficient to determine the GAP1 specificity. Replacement of Thr-35 by Ala in the common effector domain (residues 32-40) of the chimeric Ras/Rsr1 GTPases completely abolishes GAP3-dependent activation.     

Asparagine 26, glutamic acid 31, valine 45, and tyrosine 64 of Ras proteins are required for their oncogenicity.

Ras and Rap1 proteins are related GTP-dependent signal transducers which require Gly-12, the effector domain (residues 32-40), and Ala-59 for stimulation of their GTPase activities by GAP1 and GAP3, respectively. The replacement of Gly-12 by Val or Ala-59 by Thr potentiates the Ras oncogenicity and Rap1A antioncogenicity. However, the mutations in the effector domain, in particular the replacement of Thr-35 by Ala, abolish both Ras oncogenicity and Rap1A antioncogenicity, indicating that the effector domain is involved in interactions of these signal transducers with their targets as well as the GAPs. In this paper, we demonstrate that (i) replacement of Tyr-64 of the Ha-Ras protein or Phe-64 of the Rap1A protein by Glu or other non-hydrophobic amino acids reduces their intrinsic GTPase activities and abolishes their stimulation by GAP1 or GAP3, respectively, (ii) replacement of Tyr-64 by Gly and other non-hydrophobic amino acids results in complete loss of the oncogenicity of the v-Ha-Ras protein, indicating that the hydrophobic residue 64, in addition to the known effector domain, is essential for the Ras protein to interact with its target as well as GAP1. In addition we have found that Asn-26, Glu-31, and Val-45 of the v-Ha-Ras protein are required for its oncogenicity. Replacement of the Ras residues at either positions 26, 31, or 45 by the corresponding Rap1A residues abolishes the Ras oncogenicity.     

Unravelling the mechanism of dual‐specificity GAPs

The molecular mechanism by which dual‐specificity RasGAPs of the Gap1 subfamily activate the GTP hydrolysis of both Rap and Ras is an unresolved phenomenon. RasGAPs and RapGAPs use different strategies to stimulate the GTPase reaction of their cognate G‐proteins. RasGAPs contribute an arginine finger to orient through the Gln61 of Ras the nucleophilic water molecule. RapGAP contributes an asparagine (Asn thumb) into the active site to substitute for the missing Gln61. Here, by using steady‐state kinetic assays and time‐resolved Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) experiments with wild type and mutant proteins, we unravel the remarkable mechanism for the specificity switch. The plasticity of GAP1^IP4BP and RASAL is mediated by the extra GTPase‐activating protein (GAP) domains, which promote a different orientation of Ras and Rap's switch‐II and catalytic residues in the active site. Thereby, Gln63 in Rap adopts the catalytic role normally taken by Gln61 of Ras. This re‐orientation requires specific interactions between switch‐II of Rap and helix‐α6 of GAPs. This supports the notion that the specificities of fl proteins versus GAP domains are potentially different.     

ARAP3 is a PI3K- and rap-regulated GAP for RhoA

Rho and Arf family small GTPases are well-known regulators of cellular actin dynamics. We recently identified ARAP3, a member of the ARAP family of dual GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) for Arf and Rho family GTPases, in a screen for PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) binding proteins. PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) is the lipid product of class I phosphoinositide 3OH-kinases (PI3Ks) and is a signaling molecule used by growth factor receptors and integrins in the regulation of cell dynamics. We report here that as a Rho GAP, ARAP3 prefers RhoA as a substrate and that it can be activated in vitro by the direct binding of Rap proteins to a neighbouring Ras binding domain (RBD). This activation by Rap is GTP dependent and specific for Rap versus other Ras family members. We found no evidence for direct regulation of ARAP3's Rho GAP activity by PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3) in vitro, but PI3K activity was required for activation by Rap in a cellular context, suggesting that PtdIns(3,4,5)P(3)-dependent translocation of ARAP3 to the plasma membrane may be required for further activation by Rap. Our results indicate that ARAP3 is a Rap-effector that plays an important role in mediating PI3K-dependent crosstalk between Ras, Rho, and Arf family small GTPases.     

The Rap-RapGAP complex: GTP hydrolysis without catalytic glutamine and arginine residues

The GTP-binding protein Rap1 regulates integrin-mediated and other cell adhesion processes. Unlike most other Ras-related proteins, it contains a threonine in switch II instead of a glutamine (Gln61 in Ras), a residue crucial for the GTPase reaction of most G proteins. Furthermore, unlike most other GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for small G proteins, which supply a catalytically important Arg-finger, no arginine residue of RapGAP makes a significant contribution to the GTPase reaction of Rap1. For a detailed understanding of the reaction mechanism, we have solved the structure of Rap1 in complex with Rap1GAP. It shows that the Thr61 of Rap is away from the active site and that an invariant asparagine of RapGAPs, the Asn-thumb, takes over the role of the cis-glutamine of Ras, Rho or Ran. The structure and biochemical data allow to further explain the mechanism and to define the important role of a conserved tyrosine. The structure and biochemical data furthermore show that the RapGAP homologous region of the tumour suppressor Tuberin is sufficient for catalysis on Rheb.     

Insight into catalysis of a unique GTPase reaction by a combined biochemical and FTIR approach

Rap1 and Rap2 are the only small guanine nucleotide-binding proteins of the Ras superfamily that do not use glutamine for GTP hydrolysis. Moreover, Rap1GAP, which stimulates the GTPase reaction of Rap1 10(5)-fold, does not have the classical "arginine finger" like RasGAP but presumably, introduces an asparagine residue into the active site. Here, we address the requirements of this unique reaction in detail by combining various biochemical methods, such as fluorescence spectroscopy, stopped-flow and time-resolved Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The fluorescence spectroscopic assay monitors primarily protein-protein interaction steps, while FTIR resolves simultaneously the elementary steps of functional groups labor-free, but it is less sensitive and needs higher concentrations. Combining both methods allows us to distinguish weather mechanistic defects caused by mutation are due to affinity or due to functionality. We show that several mutations of Asn290 block catalysis. Some of the mutants, however, still form a complex with Rap1*GDP in the presence of BeF(x) but not AlF(x), supporting the notion that fluoride complexes are indicators of the ground versus transition state. Mutational analysis also shows that Thr61 is not required for catalysis. While replacement of Thr61 of Rap1 by Leu eliminates GTPase activation by Rap1GAP, the T61A and T61Q mutants have only a minor effect on catalysis, but change the relative rates of cleavage and (P(i)(-)) release. While Rap1GAP(N290A) is completely inactive on wild-type Rap1, it can act on Rap1(T61Q), arguing that Asn290 in trans has a role in catalysis similar to that of the intrinsic Gln in Ras and Rho. Finally, since FTIR works at high, and thus mostly saturating, concentrations, it can clearly separate effects on affinity from purely catalytic modifications, showing that Arg388, conserved between RapGAPs and mutated in the homologous RheBGAP Tuberin, affects binding affinity severely but has no effect on the cleavage reaction itself.     

Rap-specific GTPase activating protein follows an alternative mechanism.

Rap1 is a small GTPase that is involved in signal transduction cascades. It is highly homologous to Ras but it is down-regulated by its own set of GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). To investigate the mechanism of the GTP-hydrolysis reaction catalyzed by Rap1GAP, a catalytically active fragment was expressed in Escherichia coli and characterized by kinetic and mutagenesis studies. The GTPase reaction of Rap1 is stimulated 10(5)-fold by Rap1GAP and has a k(cat) of 6 s(-1) at 25 degrees C. The catalytic effect of GAPs from Ras, Rho, and Rabs depends on a crucial arginine which is inserted into the active site. However, all seven highly conserved arginines of Rap1GAP can be mutated without dramatically reducing V(max) of the GTP-hydrolysis reaction. We found instead two lysines whose mutations reduce catalysis 25- and 100-fold, most likely by an affinity effect. Rap1GAP does also not supply the crucial glutamine that is missing in Rap proteins at position 61. The Rap1(G12V) mutant which in Ras reduces catalysis 10(6)-fold is shown to be efficiently down-regulated by Rap1GAP. As an alternative, Rap1(F64A) is shown by kinetic and cell biological studies to be a Rap1GAP-resistant mutant. This study supports the notion of a completely different mechanism of the Rap1GAP-catalyzed GTP-hydrolysis reaction on Rap1.     

GAP1 family members constitute bifunctional Ras and Rap GTPase-activating proteins

GAP1(IP4BP) is a member of the GAP1 family of Ras GTPase-activating proteins (Ras GAPs) that includes GAP1(m), CAPRI, and RASAL. Composed of a central Ras GAP domain, surrounded by amino-terminal C(2) domains and a carboxyl-terminal pleckstrin homology/Bruton's tyrosine kinase domain, GAP1(IP4BP) has previously been shown to possess an unexpected GAP activity on the Ras-related protein Rap, besides the predicted Ras GAP activity (Cullen, P. J., Hsuan, J. J., Truong, O., Letcher, A. J., Jackson, T. R., Dawson, A. P., and Irvine, R. F. (1995) Nature 376, 527-530). Here we have shown that GAP1(IP4BP) is indeed an efficient Ras/Rap GAP, having K(m)s of 213 and 42 microm and estimated k(cat)s of 48 and 16 s(-1) for Ras and Rap, respectively. For this dual activity, regions outside the Ras GAP domain are required, as the isolated domain (residues 291-569) retains a pronounced Ras GAP activity yet has very low activity toward Rap. Interestingly, mutagenesis of the Ras GAP arginine finger, and surrounding residues important in Ras binding, inhibit both Ras and Rap GAP activity of GAP1(IP4BP). Although the precise details by which GAP1(IP4BP) can function as a Rap GAP remain to be determined, these data are consistent with Rap associating with GAP1(IP4BP) through the Ras-binding site within the Ras GAP domain. Finally, we have established that such dual Ras/Rap GAP activity is not restricted to GAP1(IP4BP). Although GAP1(m) appears to constitute a specific Ras GAP, CAPRI and RASAL display dual activity. For CAPRI, its Rap GAP activity is modulated upon its Ca(2+)-induced association with the plasma membrane.     

The C2 domain of SynGAP is essential for stimulation of the Rap GTPase reaction

The brain-specific synaptic guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating protein (SynGAP) is important in synaptic plasticity. It shows dual specificity for the small guanine nucleotide-binding proteins Rap and Ras. Here, we show that RapGAP activity of SynGAP requires its C2 domain. In contrast to the isolated GAP domain, which does not show any detectable RapGAP activity, a fragment comprising the C2 and GAP domains (C2-GAP) stimulates the intrinsic GTPase reaction of Rap by approximately 1 x 10(4). The C2-GAP crystal structure, complemented by modelling and biochemical analyses, favours a concerted movement of the C2 domain towards the switch II region of Rap to assist in GTPase stimulation. Our data support a catalytic mechanism similar to that of canonical RasGAPs and distinct from the canonical RapGAPs. SynGAP presents the first example, to our knowledge, of a GAP that uses a second domain for catalytic activity, thus pointing to a new function of C2 domains.     

Differential regulation of cellular activities by GTPase-activating protein and NF1.

The regulation of the GTPase activity of the Ras proteins is thought to be a key element of signal transduction. Ras proteins have intrinsic GTPase activity and are active in signal transduction when bound to GTP but not following hydrolysis of GTP to GDP. Three cellular Ras GTPase-activating proteins (Ras-gaps) which increase the GTPase activity of wild-type (wt) Ras but not activated Ras in vitro have been identified: type I and type II GAP and type I NF1. Mutations of wt Ras resulting in lowered intrinsic GTPase activity or loss of response to cellular Ras-gap proteins are thought to be the primary reason for the transforming properties of the Ras proteins. In vitro assays show type I and type II GAP and the GAP-related domain of type I NF1 to have similar biochemical properties with respect to activation of the wt Ras GTPase, and it appears as though both type I GAP and NF1 can modulate the GTPase function of Ras in cells. Here we report the assembling of a full-length coding clone for type I NF1 and the biological effects of microinjection of Ras and Ras-gap proteins into fibroblasts. We have found that type I GAP, type II GAP, and type I NF1 show markedly different biological activities in vivo. Coinjection of type I GAP or type I NF1, but not type II GAP, with wt Ras abolished the ability of wt Ras to induce expression from an AP-1-controlled reporter gene. We also found that serum-stimulated DNA synthesis was reduced by prior injection of cells with type I GAP but not type II GAP or type I NF1. These results suggest that type I GAP, type II GAP, and type I NF1 may have different activities in vivo and support the hypothesis that while type I forms of GAP and NF1 may act as negative regulators of wt Ras, they may do so with differential efficiencies.     

Analysis of Ras and Rap activation in living cells using fluorescent Ras binding domains

Ras GTPases regulate cellular growth and differentiation and are modulated by myriad stimuli including growth factors, cytokines, antigens, and UV irradiation. Ras GTPases are molecular switches that are active when GTP-bound and inactive when GDP-bound. The ability of these GTPases to signal requires that the GTP-bound form engage downstream effectors, interactions that occur only on the cytosolic surface of cellular membranes. Ras family proteins include H-Ras, N-Ras, K-Ras, and Rap1. Insight into the regulation and signaling properties of these molecules has come largely from in vitro studies relying on cellular extracts prepared following cellular stimulation. Since Ras GTPases are expressed on multiple cellular compartments that include the plasma membrane, vesicles derived from the plasma membrane, and other internal membranes such as the ER and Golgi complex, analysis of how their spatial distribution modulates signaling has remained unknown. We have developed fluorescent, GFP-based probes capable of selectively binding GTP-bound Ras or Rap1 in living cells. We have used these reporters to examine sites of cellular activation of Ras and Rap1 during growth factor stimulation. These studies have revealed new insights into the platforms from which these GTPases signal and have led to the hypothesis that GTPase signaling is modulated in a compartmentalized fashion. Here, we describe the design and implementation of fluorescent probes for Ras and Rap1.     

The novel RacE-binding protein GflB sharpens Ras activity at the leading edge of migrating cells

Directional sensing, a process in which cells convert an external chemical gradient into internal signaling events, is essential in chemotaxis. We previously showed that a Rho GTPase, RacE, regulates gradient sensing in Dictyostelium cells. Here, using affinity purification and mass spectrometry, we identify a novel RacE-binding protein, GflB, which contains a Ras GEF domain and a Rho GAP domain. Using biochemical and gene knockout approaches, we show that GflB balances the activation of Ras and Rho GTPases, which enables cells to precisely orient signaling events toward higher concentrations of chemoattractants. Furthermore, we find that GflB is located at the leading edge of migrating cells, and this localization is regulated by the actin cytoskeleton and phosphatidylserine. Our findings provide a new molecular mechanism that connects directional sensing and morphological polarization.     

Rap1A antagonizes the ability of Ras and Ras-Gap to inhibit muscarinic K+ channels

Rap1A is a Ras-related GTP binding protein which has an amino acid sequence identical to that of Ras in the putative "effector" domain (amino acids 32-40). The binding of Rap1A to Ras-GTPase activating protein (GAP) through this domain is a potential mechanism for explaining the observation that Rap1A can antagonize the ability of oncogenic Ras to transform cells. It was recently shown (Yatani, A., Okabe, K., Polakis, P., Halenbeck, R., McCormick, F., and Brown, A. M. (1990) Cell 61, 769-776) that the activation of M2-muscarinic receptor-coupled K+ channels in heart is inhibited by the addition of exogenous Ras and Ras-GAP. We have made use of this system in the present paper to show that Rap1A is able to effectively block this inhibitory action of Ras-GAP. We observed that both Rap1A-GDP and Rap1A-guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTP gamma S) were able to block the inhibitory effect of Ras-GAP upon channel activation. This effect occurred at picomolar concentrations of Rap1A, and the GTP gamma S-bound form of the protein was consistently found to be more potent than the GDP form. A Rap1A Thr35----Ala mutation which bound GTP gamma S did not prevent K+ channel inhibition by Ras-GAP, suggesting that the antagonism by wild type Rap1A involves an interaction with GAP in the effector domain. The effectiveness of Rap1A to inhibit Ras-GAP is dependent upon the amount of Ras-GAP present in the assay and can also be overcome by the addition of GTP-bound N-Ras (GC-43), suggesting a competitive mechanism is operative. Finally, a truncated form of Ras-GAP (GAP32) which is no longer dependent upon Ras for inhibition of the M2-activated K+ channel is also no longer sensitive to blockade by added Rap1A. These data support the concept of GAP as an effector of Ras action and indicate that Rap1A can serve as an inhibitor of Ras action in a system distinct from cell transformation by a competitive mechanism involving the GAP binding domain of Rap1A.     

A Point Mutation in p190A RhoGAP Affects Ciliogenesis and Leads to Glomerulocystic Kidney Defects

Rho family GTPases act as molecular switches regulating actin cytoskeleton dynamics. Attenuation of their signaling capacity is provided by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), including p190A, that promote the intrinsic GTPase activity of Rho proteins. In the current study we have performed a small-scale ENU mutagenesis screen and identified a novel loss of function allele of the p190A gene Arhgap35, which introduces a Leu1396 to Gln substitution in the GAP domain. This results in decreased GAP activity for the prototypical Rho-family members, RhoA and Rac1, likely due to disrupted ordering of the Rho binding surface. Consequently, Arhgap35-deficient animals exhibit hypoplastic and glomerulocystic kidneys. Investigation into the cystic phenotype shows that p190A is required for appropriate primary cilium formation in renal nephrons. P190A specifically localizes to the base of the cilia to permit axoneme elongation, which requires a functional GAP domain. Pharmacological manipulations further reveal that inhibition of either Rho kinase (ROCK) or F-actin polymerization is able to rescue the ciliogenesis defects observed upon loss of p190A activity. We propose a model in which p190A acts as a modulator of Rho GTPases in a localized area around the cilia to permit the dynamic actin rearrangement required for cilia elongation. Together, our results establish an unexpected link between Rho GTPase regulation, ciliogenesis and glomerulocystic kidney disease.     

Discriminatory residues in Ras and Rap for guanine nucleotide exchange factor recognition

The inability of the S17N mutant of Rap1A to sequester the catalytic domain of the Rap guanine nucleotide exchange factor C3G (van den Berghe, N., Cool, R. H., Horn, G., and Wittinghofer, A. (1997) Oncogene 15, 845-850) prompted us to study possible fundamental differences in the way Rap1 interacts with C3G compared with the interaction of Ras with the catalytic domain of the mouse Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor Cdc25(Mm). A variety of mutants in both Ras and Rap1A were designed, and both the C3G and Cdc25(Mm) catalyzed release of guanine nucleotide from these mutants was studied. In addition, we could identify regions in Rap2A that are responsible for the lack of recognition by C3G and induce high C3G activity by replacement of these residues with the corresponding Rap1A residues. The different Ras and Rap mutants showed that many residues were equally important for both C3G and Cdc25(Mm), suggesting that they interact similarly with their substrates. However, several residues were also identified to be important for the exchange reaction with only C3G (Leu70) or only Cdc25(Mm) (Gln61 and Tyr40). These results are discussed in the light of the structure of the Ras-Sos complex and suggest that some important differences in the interaction of Rap1 with C3G and Ras with Cdc25(Mm) indeed exist and that marker residues have been identified for the different structural requirements.     

Chaperone-mediated specificity in Ras and Rap signaling

Abstract

Ras and Rap proteins are closely related small guanosine triphosphatase (GTPases) that share similar effector-binding domains but operate in a very different signaling networks; Ras has a dominant role in cell proliferation, while Rap mediates cell adhesion. Ras and Rap proteins are regulated by several shared processes such as post-translational modification, phosphorylation, activation by guanine exchange factors and inhibition by GTPase-activating proteins. Sub-cellular localization and trafficking of these proteins to and from the plasma membrane are additional important regulatory features that impact small GTPases function. Despite its importance, the trafficking mechanisms of Ras and Rap proteins are not completely understood. Chaperone proteins play a critical role in trafficking of GTPases and will be the focus of the discussion in this work. We will review several aspects of chaperone biology focusing on specificity toward particular members of the small GTPase family. Understanding this specificity should provide key insights into drug development targeting individual small GTPases.     

Structural basis for the unique biological function of small GTPase RHEB

The small GTPase Rheb displays unique biological and biochemical properties different from other small GTPases and functions as an important mediator between the tumor suppressor proteins TSC1 and TSC2 and the mammalian target of rapamycin to stimulate cell growth. We report here the three-dimensional structures of human Rheb in complexes with GDP, GTP, and GppNHp (5'-(beta,gamma-imide)triphosphate), which reveal novel structural features of Rheb and provide a molecular basis for its distinct properties. During GTP/GDP cycling, switch I of Rheb undergoes conformational change while switch II maintains a stable, unusually extended conformation, which is substantially different from the alpha-helical conformation seen in other small GTPases. The unique switch II conformation results in a displacement of Gln64 (equivalent to the catalytic Gln61 of Ras), making it incapable of participating in GTP hydrolysis and thus accounting for the low intrinsic GTPase activity of Rheb. This rearrangement also creates space to accommodate the side chain of Arg15, avoiding its steric hindrance with the catalytic residue and explaining its noninvolvement in GTP hydrolysis. Unlike Ras, the phosphate moiety of GTP in Rheb is shielded by the conserved Tyr35 of switch I, leading to the closure of the GTP-binding site, which appears to prohibit the insertion of a potential arginine finger from its GTPase-activating protein. Taking the genetic, biochemical, biological, and structural data together, we propose that Rheb forms a new group of the Ras/Rap subfamily and uses a novel GTP hydrolysis mechanism that utilizes Asn1643 of the tuberous sclerosis complex 2 GTPase-activating protein domain instead of Gln64 of Rheb as the catalytic residue.     

Mechanism of the spatio-temporal regulation of Ras and Rap1

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) activates Ras and Rap1 at distinct intracellular regions. Here, we explored the mechanism underlying this phenomenon. We originally noticed that in cells expressing Epac, a cAMP-dependent Rap1 GEF (guanine nucleotide exchange factor), cAMP activated Rap1 at the perinuclear region, as did EGF. However, in cells expressing e-GRF, a recombinant cAMP-responsive Ras GEF, cAMP activated Ras at the peripheral plasma membrane. Based on the uniform cytoplasmic expression of Epac and e-GRF, GEF did not appear to account for the non-uniform increase in the activities of Ras and Rap1. In contrast, when we used probes with reduced sensitivity to GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), both Ras and Rap1 appeared to be activated uniformly in the EGF-stimulated cells. Furthermore, we calculated the local rate constants of GEFs and GAPs from the video images of Ras activation and found that GAP activity was higher at the central plasma membrane than the periphery. Thus we propose that GAP primarily dictates the spatial regulation of Ras family G proteins, whereas GEF primarily determines the timing of Ras activation.