ROS signaling in the hypersensitive response: When,where and what for?

Plants generally react to the attack of non-host and incompatible host microorganisms by inducing pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and localised cell death (LCD) at the site of infection, a process collectively known as the hypersensitive response (HR). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated in various sub-cellular compartments shortly after pathogen recognition, and proposed to cue subsequent orchestration of the HR. Although apoplast-associated ROS production by plasma membrane NADPH oxidases have been most thoroughly studied, recent observations suggest that ROS are generated in chloroplasts earlier in the response and play a key role in execution of LCD. A model is presented in which the initial outcome of successful pathogen detection is ROS accumulation in plastids, likely mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinases and caused by dysfunction of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. ROS signaling is proposed to spread from plastids to the apoplast, through the activation of NADPH oxidases, and from there to adjacent cells, leading to suicidal death in the region of attempted infection.Key words: biotic stress, chloroplasts, flavodoxin, hypersensitive response (HR), reactive oxygen species (ROS), ROS signaling     

Actin and microtubules in neurite initiation: are MAPs the missing link?

During neurite initiation microtubules align to form a tight bundle and actin filaments reorganize to produce a growth cone. The mechanisms that underlie these highly coordinated cytoskeletal rearrangements are not yet fully understood. Recently, various levels of coordination between the actin- and microtubule-based cytoskeletons have been observed during cellular migration and morphogenesis, processes that share some similarities to neurite initiation. Direct, physical association between both cytoskeletons has been suggested, because microtubules often preferentially grow along actin bundles and transiently target actin-rich adhesion complexes. We propose that such physical association might be involved in force-based interactions and spatial organization of the two networks during neurite initiation as well. In addition, many signaling cascades that affect actin filaments are also involved in the regulation of microtubule dynamics, and vice versa. Although several candidates for mediating these effects have been identified in non-neuronal cells, the general mechanism is still poorly understood. In neurons certain plakins and neuron-specific microtubule associated proteins (MAPs), like MAP1B and MAP2, which can bind to both microtubules and F-actin, are promising candidates to play key roles in the specific cytoskeletal rearrangements controlling the transition from an undifferentiated state to neurite-bearing morphology. Here we review the effects of MAPs on microtubules and actin, as well as the coordination of both cytoskeletons during neurite initiation.     

Signalling shortcuts: cell-surface receptors in the nucleus?

Do cell-surface growth-factor receptors and their ligands accumulate in the nucleoplasm under physiological conditions? And, if so, how do they get there and what function do they serve in this location? Recent advances have provided tantalizing hints to the answers to these questions, and hold the key to identifying a new mode of signal transduction.     

Holliday junctions in the eukaryotic nucleus: resolution in sight?

The Holliday junction is a key recombination intermediate whose resolution generates crossovers. Interplay between recombination, repair and replication has moved the Holliday junction to the center stage of nuclear DNA metabolism. Holliday junction resolvases in the eukaryotic nucleus have long eluded identification. The endonucleases Mus81/Mms4-Eme1 and XPF-MEI-9/MUS312 are structurally related to the archaeal resolvase Hjc and were found to be involved in crossover formation in budding yeast and flies, respectively. Although these endonucleases might represent one class of eukaryotic resolvases, their substrate preference opens up the possibility that junctions other than classical Holliday junctions might contribute to crossovers. Holliday junction resolution to non-crossover products can also be achieved topologically, for example, by the action of RecQ-like DNA helicases combined with topoisomerase III.     

Treatment with anthelminthics during pregnancy: what gains and what risks for the mother and child?

In 1994 and 2002, respectively, the World Health Organisation proposed that treatment for hookworm and schistosomiasis could be provided during pregnancy. It was hoped that this might have benefits for maternal anaemia, fetal growth and perinatal mortality; a beneficial effect on the infant response to immunisation was also hypothesised. Three trials have now been conducted. Two have examined the effects of benzimidazoles; one (the Entebbe Mother and Baby Study) the effects of albendazole and praziquantel. All three were conducted in settings of high prevalence but low intensity helminth infection. Results suggest that, in such settings and given adequate provision of haematinics, the benefit of routine anthelminthics during pregnancy for maternal anaemia may be small; none of the other expected benefits has yet been demonstrated. The Entebbe Mother and Baby Study found a significant adverse effect of albendazole on the incidence of infantile eczema in the whole study population, and of praziquantel on the incidence of eczema among infants of mothers with Schistosoma mansoni. Further studies are required in settings that differ in helminth species and infection intensities. Further research is required to determine whether increased rates of infantile eczema translate to long-term susceptibility to allergy, and to explore the underlying mechanisms of these effects. The risks and benefits of routine anthelminthic treatment in antenatal clinics may need to be reconsidered.     

Genetic and epigenetic alterations in breast cancer: what are the perspectives for clinical practice?

The worldwide incidence of breast cancer affects 1.2 million women each year. In contrast to the high occurrence of this malady, a decline in mortality is reported among industrialized countries. In this respect, both awareness campaigns and substantial progress achieved in therapy and diagnosis allowed for the enhancement of the survival rate in patients with breast cancer. Undoubtedly, oncology research programs played a relevant role in the improvement of therapeutics and diagnostics for breast cancer. Major strides were reported, especially over the last decade and a half, in better understanding molecular and cellular biology events involved in breast cancer pathogenesis and progression of the disease. However, therapeutic approaches for the treatment of patients with breast cancer need further improvement. Therapeutic interventions can chronically compromise both the state of health and quality of life of breast cancer survivors. In addition, current therapeutic approaches have not significantly improved the survival rate in patients with metastatic disease. On these grounds, it is necessary to develop more efficient therapeutics and diagnostic tools, which can improve the health and quality of life of breast cancer survivors and increase the survival rate in patients with metastatic disease. In this respect, the field of cancer research has placed a particular emphasis on the elucidation of genetic and epigenetic alterations that may lead to the pathogenesis of breast cancer and contribute to its progression.     

Actin and Microtubules in Cell Motility: Which One is in Control?

The cytoskeleton is composed of three distinct elements: actin microfilaments, microtubules and intermediate filaments. The actin cytoskeleton is thought to provide protrusive and contractile forces, and microtubules to form a polarized network allowing organelle and protein movement throughout the cell. Intermediate filaments are generally considered the most rigid component, responsible for the maintenance of the overall cell shape. Cytoskeletal elements must be coordinately regulated for the cell to fulfill complex cellular functions, as diverse as cell migration, cell adhesion and cell division. Coordination between cytoskeletal elements is achieved by signaling pathways, involving common regulators such as the Rho guanosine-5'-triphosphatases (GTPases). Furthermore, evidence is now accumulating that cytoskeletal elements participate in regulating each other. As a consequence, although their functions seem well defined, they are in fact overlapping, with actin playing a role in membrane trafficking and microtubules being involved in the control of protrusive and contractile forces. This cytoskeletal crosstalk is both direct and mediated by signaling molecules. Cell motility is a well-studied example where the interplay between actin and microtubules appears bidirectional. This leads us to wonder which, if any, cytoskeletal element leads the way.     

Does looping and clustering in the nucleus regulate gene expression?

There has been considerable interest in the way that chromatin is spatially organised within the cell nucleus and how that may relate to gene expression and its control. New molecular techniques have identified looped chromatin domains at the mammalian beta-globin and the Drosophila hsp70 loci. Looped domains may insulate chromatin from the influence of neighbouring domains, and the bases of loops may also act to concentrate proteins locally within the nucleus. The spatial clustering of sequences from the Drosophila bithorax complex, located in trans, has also been demonstrated. An emerging theme is that bringing DNA and proteins together within a defined sub-region of the nuclear volume facilitates both the activation and the repression of gene expression. Nuclear compartments may also be involved in the post-translational modification of proteins by sumoylation and ubiquitylation.     

Genomic imprinting and kinship in the social Hymenoptera: what are the predictions?

The kinship theory of genomic imprinting predicts that conflicts of interest between parents can promote the evolution of opposed expression patterns of maternally and paternally derived alleles in the offspring. The social Hymenoptera (ants, some bees, and some wasps) are particularly suitable to test this theory, because a variety of social conflicts are predicted due to relatedness asymmetries between female and male nestmates that are a corollary of haplo-diploid sex determination. Here I argue that the kin-selection predictions for genomic imprinting in social Hymenoptera might in many cases be more complex than previously suggested, because the optimal strategy will have to take fitness effects in different castes and sexes into account.     

Glycoproteins: what are the sugar chains for?

For many glycoproteins, the carbohydrate groups confer important physical properties such as conformational stability, protease resistance, charge and water-binding capacity. Equally important, however, are the roles of carbohydrate groups in biological recognition, where sequence diversity provides signals for protein targeting and cell-cell interactions.     

Proximate and ultimate causes: how come? and what for?

Proximate and ultimate causes in evolutionary biology have come to conflate two distinctions. The first is a distinction between immediate and historical causes. The second is between explanations of mechanism and adaptive function. Mayr emphasized the first distinction but many evolutionary biologists use proximate and ultimate causes to refer to the second. I recommend that ‘ultimate cause’ be abandoned as ambiguous.