Signal Recognition Particle and SecA Cooperate during Export of Secretory Proteins with Highly Hydrophobic Signal Sequences

The Sec translocon of bacterial plasma membranes mediates the linear translocation of secretory proteins as well as the lateral integration of membrane proteins. Integration of many membrane proteins occurs co-translationally via the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of ribosome-associated nascent chains to the Sec translocon. In contrast, translocation of classical secretory proteins across the Sec translocon is a post-translational event requiring no SRP but the motor protein SecA. Secretory proteins were, however, reported to utilize SRP in addition to SecA, if the hydrophobicity of their signal sequences exceeds a certain threshold value. Here we have analyzed transport of this subgroup of secretory proteins across the Sec translocon employing an entirely defined in vitro system. We thus found SecA to be both necessary and sufficient for translocation of secretory proteins with hydrophobic signal sequences, whereas SRP and its receptor improved translocation efficiency. This SRP-mediated boost of translocation is likely due to the early capture of the hydrophobic signal sequence by SRP as revealed by site-specific photo cross-linking of ribosome nascent chain complexes.     

The rat liver asialoglycoprotein receptor polypeptide must be inserted into a microsome to achieve its active conformation

Affinity chromatography on galactose-Sepharose has been utilized to demonstrate that rat liver asialoglycoprotein receptor synthesized in vitro in a reticulocyte lysate system is capable of binding carbohydrate ligand only when dog pancreas microsomes are present during translation. Analysis of receptor isolated from tunicamycin-treated rat hepatocytes indicates that glycosylation is not necessary for receptor activity. Genetically engineered receptor derivatives in which the natural membrane anchor is either deleted entirely or replaced with a cleavable signal sequence derived from dog preproinsulin have been used to demonstrate that: (a) inactive receptor made in the absence of membranes does not result from incorrect nucleation of folding around the hydrophobic portion of the polypeptide which is normally buried in the membrane and (b) the carbohydrate-binding domain of the receptor does not need to be tethered to the luminal side of the membrane to fold correctly. These results suggest that factors within the lumen of the microsomes are essential to establish the native conformation of the binding domain.     

An internal signal sequence: the asialoglycoprotein receptor membrane anchor

The human asialoglycoprotein receptor H1 is anchored in the membrane by a single stretch of 20 hydrophobic amino acids; the hydrophilic amino terminus faces the cytoplasm, and the carboxyl terminus is exoplasmic. We show here that glycosylation and insertion of the asialoglycoprotein receptor into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane is cotranslational and SRP-dependent and occurs without proteolytic cleavage. The membrane-anchor domain is necessary for membrane insertion, since a receptor with the segment deleted is neither inserted nor glycosylated. The segment is also sufficient for membrane insertion, since it will initiate translocation of a carboxy-terminal domain of rat alpha-tubulin across the membrane. We propose that a helical hairpin mechanism of membrane insertion is used both by cleaved amino-terminal and uncleaved internal signal sequences.     

Alterations to the signal peptide of an outer membrane protein (OmpA) of Escherichia coli K-12 can promote either the cotranslational or the posttranslational mode of processing

The signal sequence of the precursor of the Escherichia coli outer membrane protein OmpA was altered by oligonucleotide insertions into the corresponding gene. In one case, OmpA-S1, the hydrophobic core of the signal peptide, is reduced from 12 to 10 residues, and one positive charge is added near the NH2-terminus. In another case, OmpA-P1, the hydrophobic core is extended from 12 to 16 residues. The pro-OmpA protein is normally processed partially co- and partially posttranslationally. Processing of the pro-OmpA-S1 protein was entirely posttranslational and that of the pro-OmpA-P1 protein strictly cotranslational. Evidence is presented which strongly suggests that posttranslational processing reflects posttranslational translocation across the plasma membrane. The generation times of cells expressing pro-OmpA-P1 or pro-OmpA-S1 were identical and the pro-OmpA-S1 polypeptide could be chased into the mature protein in the absence of protein synthesis. Hence, it does not matter which mode of processing, or rather translocation, is used. The same oligonucleotides were inserted into the ompA gene of plasmid pRD87; a plasmid which leads to overproduction of the protein and to massive accumulation of both the mature protein and the precursor. In the OmpA signal sequence encoded by pRD87-P2 the hydrophobic core is extended from 12 to 20 residues. This peptide was also rapidly removed. Therefore, regardless of whether the hydrophobic core contains 12, 16, or 20 lipophilic residues, not only does the signal sequence always function correctly to mediate export, but in each case, the cleavage site is always accessible to the signal peptidase.     

Molecular mechanisms of cytokine receptor activation

Cytokine receptors are transmembrane proteins that transmit a signal into the cell upon ligand binding. Commonly, these molecules have one hydrophobic segment of about 20-26 amino acids that is believed to span the membrane as a helix and this divides these receptors into extra- and intracellular components. By utilizing two different epitopes, the cytokines bridge two receptor chains, resulting in a close proximity of the intracellular component and thereby initiating the intracellular signalling cascade. The dimerization event is believed to be the mechanism by which the signal is transmitted across a membrane. In the light of new results obtained for the erythropoietin receptor, James A. Wells questioned whether any dimer would be sufficient. This review will expand upon the above question by discussing the more complex signal-transducing receptor subunits of the Interleukin-6 type family of cytokines. Based on the recently solved quaternary structure of the Insulin receptor, possible analogies will be confronted.     

Insertion of a signal peptide-derived hydrophobic segment into the mature domain of OmpC, an outer membrane protein, does not interfere with the export of the following polypeptide chain across the cytoplasmic membrane of E. coli

The effects of a hydrophobic peptide segment inserted into the amino-terminal region of the mature domain of OmpC, an outer membrane protein, on its translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane was studied. Both the intact OmpC and central domain-deleted OmpC were examined. The hydrophobic segment was derived from the signal peptide of OmpF. Secretory translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane was examined by means of proteinase K treatment. Four monoclonal antibodies that recognize different regions of OmpC were used to characterize proteinase K-resistant fragments. Insertion of the hydrophobic segment did not appreciably prevent the translocation of these proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane, larger parts of them being found as mature forms, which were mostly localized outside the cytoplasmic membrane. Circumstantial evidence supports the view, on the other hand, that the inserted hydrophobic domain was retained in the cytoplasmic membrane. It is concluded, therefore, that the hydrophobic segment, although it is not exported across the cytoplasmic membrane, does not prevent the secretion of the following polypeptide chain. The secretion was dependent on the amino-terminal signal peptide. Insertion of positive charges immediately after the hydrophobic segment resulted in suppression of the translocation. Based on these results possible mechanisms by which the secretion of the polypeptide chain after the hydrophobic segment are discussed.     

2D NMR and structural model for a mitochondrial signal peptide bound to a micelle

The 19 amino acid signal peptide of rat liver aldehyde dehydrogenase, possessing a lysine substitution for an arginine and containing 3 extra amino acid residues at the C terminus, was studied by two-dimensional NMR in a dodecylphosphocholine micelle. In this membrane-like environment, the peptide contains two alpha-helical regions, both of which are amphiphilic, separated by a hinge region. The helix located closer to the C terminus is more stable than is the helix located near the N terminus. This suggests that the hydrophobic face of the C-terminal helix is buried within the hydrophobic region of the micelle. On the basis of these results a general model for protein translocation is presented in which the C-terminal amphiphilic helix of the signal region in the preprotein first binds to the mitochondrial membrane and then diffuses to the translocation receptor. The receptor then recognizes the N-terminal helix of the signal region, which is not anchored to the membrane. To explain how this signal peptide was imported into isolated mitochondria in the absence of energy or receptor protein [Pak, Y. K., & Weiner, H. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 14298-14307], a model for signal peptide translocation across a membrane barrier without the need for auxiliary membrane proteins is proposed. In this model the faces of the two helices fold upon each other, resulting in the mutual shielding of positively charged residues by the complementary hydrophilic face of the other amphiphilic helix.     

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) translocon can differentiate between hydrophobic sequences allowing signals for glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor addition to be fully translocated into the ER lumen

The signal sequence within polypeptide chains that designates whether a protein is to be anchored to the membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor is characterized by a carboxyl-terminal hydrophobic domain preceded by a short hydrophilic spacer linked to the GPI anchor attachment (omega) site. The hydrophobic domain within the GPI anchor signal sequence is very similar to a transmembrane domain within a stop transfer sequence. To investigate whether the GPI anchor signal sequence is translocated across or integrated into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane we studied the translocation, GPI anchor addition, and glycosylation of different variants of a model GPI-anchored protein. Our results unequivocally demonstrated that the hydrophobic domain within a GPI signal cannot act as a transmembrane domain and is fully translocated even when followed by an authentic charged cytosolic tail sequence. However, a single amino acid change within the hydrophobic domain of the GPI-signal converts it into a transmembrane domain that is fully integrated into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. These results demonstrated that the translocation machinery can recognize and differentiate subtle changes in hydrophobic sequence allowing either full translocation or membrane integration.     

A tripartite structure of the signals that determine protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Multilineage colony stimulating factor is a secretory protein with a cleavable signal sequence that is unusually long and hydrophobic. Using molecular cloning techniques we exchanged sequences NH2- or COOH-terminally flanking the hydrophobic signal sequence. Such modified fusion proteins still inserted into the membrane but their signal sequence was not cleaved. Instead the proteins were now anchored in the membrane by the formerly cleaved signal sequence (signal-anchor sequence). They exposed the NH2 terminus on the exoplasmic and the COOH terminus on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. We conclude from our results that hydrophilic sequences flanking the hydrophobic core of a signal sequence can determine cleavage by signal peptidase and insertion into the membrane. It appears that negatively charged amino acid residues close to the NH2 terminal side of the hydrophobic segment are compatible with translocation of this segment across the membrane. A tripartite structure is proposed for signal-anchor sequences: a hydrophobic core region that mediates targeting to and insertion into the ER membrane and flanking hydrophilic segments that determine the orientation of the protein in the membrane.     

Fusion of sequence elements from non-anchored proteins to generate a fully functional signal for glycophosphatidylinositol membrane anchor attachment

Glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor attachment is directed by a cleavable signal at the COOH terminus of the protein. The complete lack of homology among different GPI-anchored proteins suggests that this signal is of a general nature. Previous analysis of the GPI signal of decay accelerating factor (DAF) suggests that the minimal requirements for GPI attachment are (a) a hydrophobic domain and (b) a cleavage/attachment site consisting of a pair of small residues positioned 10-12 residues NH2-terminal to a hydrophobic domain. As an ultimate test of these rules we constructed four synthetic GPI signals, meeting these requirements but assembled entirely from sequence elements not normally involved in GPI attachment. We show that these synthetic signals are able to direct human growth hormone (hGH), a secreted protein, to the plasma membrane via a GPI anchor. Our results indicate that different hydrophobic sequences, derived from either the prolactin or hGH NH2-terminal signal peptide, can be linked to different cleavage sites via different hydrophilic spacers to produce a functional GPI signal. These data confirm that the only requirements for GPI-anchoring are a pair of small residues positioned 10-12 residues NH2 terminal to a hydrophobic domain, no other structural motifs being necessary.     

Charged residues are major determinants of the transmembrane orientation of a signal-anchor sequence

Uncleaved signal-anchor sequences of membrane proteins inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum initiate the translocation of either the amino-terminal or the carboxyl-terminal polypeptide segment across the bilayer. Which topology is acquired is not determined by the apolar segment of the signal but rather by the hydrophilic sequences flanking it. To study the role of charged residues in determining the membrane topology, the insertion of mutants of the asialoglycoprotein receptor H1, a single-spanning protein with a cytoplasmic amino terminus, was analyzed in transfected COS-7 cells. When the charged amino acids flanking the hydrophobic signal were mutated to residues of opposite charge, half the polypeptides inserted with the inverted orientation. When, in addition, the amino-terminal domain of the mutant protein was truncated, approximately 90% of the polypeptides acquired the inverted topology. The transmembrane orientation appears to be primarily determined by the charges flanking the signal sequence but is modulated by the domains to be translocated.     

The Pseudo Signal Peptide of the Corticotropin-releasing Factor Receptor Type 2a Decreases Receptor Expression and Prevents Gi-mediated Inhibition of Adenylyl Cyclase Activity

The corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2a (CRF_2(a)R) belongs to the family of G protein-coupled receptors. The receptor possesses an N-terminal pseudo signal peptide that is unable to mediate targeting of the nascent chain to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane during early receptor biogenesis. The pseudo signal peptide remains uncleaved and consequently forms an additional hydrophobic receptor domain with unknown function that is unique within the large G protein-coupled receptor protein family. Here, we have analyzed the functional significance of this domain in comparison with the conventional signal peptide of the homologous corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (CRF₁R). We show that the presence of the pseudo signal peptide leads to a very low cell surface receptor expression of the CRF_2(a)R in comparison with the CRF₁R. Moreover, whereas the presence of the pseudo signal peptide did not affect coupling to the G_s protein, G_i-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity was abolished. The properties mediated by the pseudo signal peptide were entirely transferable to the CRF₁R in signal peptide exchange experiments. Taken together, our results show that signal peptides do not only influence early protein biogenesis. In the case of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtypes, the use of conventional and pseudo signal peptides have an unexpected influence on signal transduction.     

Positively charged residues, the helical conformation and the structural flexibility of the leader sequence of pALDH are important for recognition by hTom20

Tom20, a mitochondrial outer membrane receptor necessary for protein translocation, was found to interact specifically with mitochondrial preproteins. The interaction of proteins containing an N-terminal matrix targeting signal was enhanced in an hydrophobic environment and the dependence of this interaction on the alpha helical conformation of the presequence was postulated. In order to test this hypothesis and to gain insights about the features of a matrix targeting signal necessary to be recognized by the receptor machinery including Tom20, the interaction of pALDH and signal sequence mutants to Tom20 in the absence and presence of a hydrophobic environment was investigated. Here we present evidence to show that in a hydrophobic environment the interaction between Tom20 and the leader sequence is strongly dependent on the positive charges within the signal sequence as well as on the flexibility of this signal.     

Stop-transfer activity of hydrophobic sequences depends on the translation system

Signal and stop-transfer sequences are the known determinants involved in topogenesis of integral membrane proteins. To study the characteristics of stop-transfer sequences, artificial proteins have been created on the DNA level based on the cDNA of the asialoglycoprotein receptor H1. Its internal signal/anchor domain initiates translocation of the downstream sequence across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. The ability of several hydrophobic sequences inserted into the translocating polypeptide to stop further transfer was analyzed by translation of the fusion proteins using the wheat germ extract and rabbit reticulocyte lysate systems with dog pancreas microsomes. We discovered that some of the sequences behave differently with respect to translocation across the membrane depending on the translation system. Expression of one of the fusion proteins in fibroblasts showed that the reticulocyte lysate system reflects more closely the in vivo situation than the wheat germ system. Our results suggest that in a homologous system the translating ribosomes interact with the translocation machinery and influence the termination of polypeptide transfer by hydrophobic sequences.     

Signal sequence-dependent function of the TRAM protein during early phases of protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Cotranslational translocation of proteins across the mammalian ER membrane involves, in addition to the signal recognition particle receptor and the Sec61p complex, the translocating chain-associating membrane (TRAM) protein, the function of which is still poorly understood. Using reconstituted proteoliposomes, we show here that the translocation of most, but not all, secretory proteins requires the function of TRAM. Experiments with hybrid proteins demonstrate that the structure of the signal sequence determines whether or not TRAM is needed. Features that distinguish TRAM-dependent and -independent signal sequences include the length of their charged, NH2-terminal region and the structure of their hydrophobic core. In cases where TRAM is required for translocation, it is not needed for the initial interaction of the ribosome/nascent chain complex with the ER membrane but for a subsequent step inside the membrane in which the nascent chain is inserted into the translocation site in a protease-resistant manner. Thus, TRAM functions in a signal sequence-dependent manner at a critical, early phase of the translocation process.     

The thylakoid proton gradient promotes an advanced stage of signal peptide binding deep within the Tat pathway receptor complex

Tat (twin arginine translocation) systems transport folded proteins across the thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts and the plasma membrane of most bacteria. Tat precursors are targeted by hydrophobic cleavable signal peptides with twin arginine (RR) motifs. Bacterial precursors possess an extended consensus, (S/T)RRXFLK, of which the two arginines and the phenylalanine are essential for efficient transport. Thylakoid Tat precursors possess twin arginines but lack the consensus phenylalanine. Here, we have characterized two stages of precursor binding to the thylakoid Tat signal peptide receptor, the 700-kDa cpTatC-Hcf106 complex. The OE17 precursor tOE17 binds to the receptor by RR-dependant electrostatic interactions and partially dissociates during blue native gel electrophoresis. In addition, the signal peptide of thylakoid-bound tOE17 is highly exposed to the membrane surface, as judged by accessibility to factor Xa of cleavage sites engineered into signal peptide flanking regions. By contrast, tOE17 containing a consensus phenylalanine in place of Val(-20) (V - 20F) binds the receptor more strongly and is completely stable during blue native gel electrophoresis. Thylakoid bound V - 20F is also completely protected from factor Xa at the identical sites. This suggests that the signal peptide is buried deeply in the cpTatC-Hcf106 binding site. We further provide evidence that the proton gradient, which is required for translocation, induces a tighter interaction between tOE17 and the cpTat machinery, similar to that exhibited by V - 20F. This implies that translocation involves a very intimate association of the signal peptide with the receptor complex binding site.     

Recognition of the carboxyl-terminal signal for GPI modification requires translocation of its hydrophobic domain across the ER membrane

A carboxyl-terminal hydrophobic domain is an essential component of the processed signal for attachment of the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor to proteins and it is linked to the site (omega) of GPI modification by a spacer domain. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the hydrophobic domain interacts with the lipid bilayer of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane to optimally position the omega site for GPI modification. The hydrophobic domain of the GPI signal in the human folate receptor (FR) type alpha was substituted with the carboxyl-terminal segment of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), including its membrane spanning region, without altering either the spacer or the omega site. The FR-alpha/LDLR chimera was not GPI modified but was attached to the plasma membrane by a polypeptide anchor. When the carboxyl-terminal half of the hydrophobic transmembrane polypeptide in the FR-alpha/LDLR chimera was altered by introduction of negatively charged (Asp) residues, or when the cytosolic domain in the chimera was deleted, the mutated proteins became GPI-anchored. On the other hand, attachment of a carboxyl-terminal segment of LDLR including the entire cytosolic domain to FR-alpha converted it into a transmembrane protein. The results indicate that in the FR-alpha/LDLR chimera the inability of the cellular machinery for GPI modification to recognize the hydrophobic domain is not due to the intrinsic nature of the peptide, but is rather due to the retention of the peptide within the lipid bilayer. It follows that the hydrophobic domain in the signal for GPI modification must traverse the ER membrane prior to recognition of the omega site by the GPI-protein transamidase. The results thus establish a critical topographical requirement for recognition of the GPI signal in the ER.     

TonB protein of Salmonella typhimurium. A model for signal transduction between membranes

The tonB gene product is required for several outer membrane transport processes in bacteria. The tonB gene from Salmonella typhimurium was sequenced and found to be similar to that of Escherichia coli. The TonB protein is highly proline-rich and includes an unusual segment consisting of multiple X-Pro dipeptide repeats. A synthetic peptide corresponding to this segment has been used to raise anti-TonB antibodies. TonB was shown to be associated with the cytoplasmic membrane, apparently anchored via a single hydrophobic N-terminal segment. Protease accessibility studies, and the use of a series of TonB-beta-lactamase fusions, showed that the rest of the TonB protein is periplasmic. Unusually, export of TonB is not accompanied by cleavage of the N-terminal signal peptide. In the accompanying paper, we show that TonB interacts directly with the outer membrane FhuA (TonA) receptor. Thus, TonB must span the periplasm, providing a link between the cytoplasmic membrane and receptors in the outer membrane. On the basis of these data, and those published by other laboratories, we propose a model whereby TonB serves as a "mechanical" linkage that, by transmitting protein conformational changes from the cytoplasmic membrane across the periplasm, acts as a means of coupling energy to outer membrane transport processes. Such a mechanism has general implications for signal transduction within and between proteins.     

The topogenic contribution of uncharged amino acids on signal sequence orientation in the endoplasmic reticulum

Signal sequences for insertion of proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum induce translocation of either the C- or the N-terminal sequence across the membrane. The end that is translocated is primarily determined by the flanking charges and the hydrophobic domain of the signal. To characterize the hydrophobic contribution to topogenesis, we have challenged the translocation machinery in vivo in transfected COS cells with model proteins differing exclusively in the apolar segment of the signal. Homo-oligomers of hydrophobic amino acids as different in size and shape as Val(19), Trp(19), and Tyr(22) generated functional signal sequences with similar topologies in the membrane. The longer a homo-oligomeric sequence of a given residue, the more N-terminal translocation was obtained. To determine the topogenic contribution of all uncharged amino acids in the context of a hydrophobic signal sequence, two residues in a generic oligoleucine signal were exchanged for all uncharged amino acids. The resulting scale resembles a hydrophobicity scale with the more hydrophobic residues promoting N-terminal translocation. In addition, the helix breakers glycine and proline showed a position-dependent effect, which raises the possibility of a conformational contribution to topogenesis.     

Molecular sorting of proteins into the cisternal secretory pathway

Cotranslational translocation of exportable proteins across the RER membrane prior to their release into the extracellular space has been essentially described by use of canine pancreatic microsomal membranes. Intracisternal segregation of nascent secretory proteins was observed to be irreversible and proteolytic removal of signal sequences resulted in conformationally mature and stable proteins. Structural studies on various translocation peptides from both eukaryotic and prokaryotic preparations showed that many of them have a comparable three-domain organization. A hydrophilic amino-terminal domain is followed by a core region of hydrophobic amino acids and by the region in which the proteolytic cleavage occurs. Membrane components involved in the translocation process namely the signal recognition particle and the SRP receptor as well as the way the vectorial transport mechanism of nascent secretory proteins occurs are also discussed.