共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Cian J. Lynch Raquel Bernad Isabel Calvo Sandrina Nóbrega-Pereira Sergio Ruiz Nuria Ibarz Ana Martinez-Val Osvaldo Graña-Castro Gonzalo Gómez-López Eduardo Andrés-León Vladimir Espinosa Angarica Antonio del Sol Sagrario Ortega Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo Enrique Rojo Javier Munoz Manuel Serrano 《Cell reports》2018,22(2):396-410
8.
9.
10.
Summer A. Morrill Alexandra E. Exner Michael Babokhov Bradley I. Reinfeld Stephen M. Fuchs 《The Journal of biological chemistry》2016,291(22):11540-11550
The C-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II in eukaryotes is comprised of tandemly repeating units of a conserved seven-amino acid sequence. The number of repeats is, however, quite variable across different organisms. Furthermore, previous studies have identified evidence of rearrangements within the CTD coding region, suggesting that DNA instability may play a role in regulating or maintaining CTD repeat number. The work described here establishes a clear connection between DNA instability and CTD repeat number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. First, analysis of 36 diverse S. cerevisiae isolates revealed evidence of numerous past rearrangements within the DNA sequence that encodes the CTD. Interestingly, the total number of CTD repeats was relatively static (24–26 repeats in all strains), suggesting a balancing act between repeat expansion and contraction. In an effort to explore the genetic plasticity within this region, we measured the rates of repeat expansion and contraction using novel reporters and a doxycycline-regulated expression system for RPB1. In efforts to determine the mechanisms leading to CTD repeat variability, we identified the presence of DNA secondary structures, specifically G-quadruplex-like DNA, within the CTD coding region. Furthermore, we demonstrated that mutating PIF1, a G-quadruplex-specific helicase, results in increased CTD repeat length polymorphisms. We also determined that RAD52 is necessary for CTD repeat expansion but not contraction, identifying a role for recombination in repeat expansion. Results from these DNA rearrangements may help explain the CTD copy number variation seen across eukaryotes, as well as support a model of CTD expansion and contraction to maintain CTD integrity and overall length. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
《Molecular cell》2023,83(14):2449-2463.e13
17.
18.
Juha Kurkela Julia Fredman Tiina A Salminen Taina Tyystjrvi 《Molecular microbiology》2021,115(1):1-11
The conserved omega (ω) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the only nonessential subunit of bacterial RNAP core. The small ω subunit (7 kDa–11.5 kDa) contains three conserved α helices, and helices α2 and α3 contain five fully conserved amino acids of ω. Four conserved amino acids stabilize the correct folding of the ω subunit and one is located in the vicinity of the β′ subunit of RNAP. Otherwise ω shows high variation between bacterial taxa, and although the main interaction partner of ω is always β′, many interactions are taxon‐specific. ω‐less strains show pleiotropic phenotypes, and based on in vivo and in vitro results, a few roles for the ω subunits have been described. Interactions of the ω subunit with the β′ subunit are important for the RNAP core assembly and integrity. In addition, the ω subunit plays a role in promoter selection, as ω‐less RNAP cores recruit fewer primary σ factors and more alternative σ factors than intact RNAP cores in many species. Furthermore, the promoter selection of an ω‐less RNAP holoenzyme bearing the primary σ factor seems to differ from that of an intact RNAP holoenzyme. 相似文献
19.
20.