Molecular basis of the interaction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Eaf3 chromo domain with methylated H3K36

Eaf3 is a component of both NuA4 histone acetyltransferase and Rpd3S histone deacetylase complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It is involved in the regulation of the global pattern of histone acetylation that distinguishes promoters from coding regions. Eaf3 contains a chromo domain at the N terminus that can bind to methylated Lys-36 of histone H3 (H3K36). We report here the crystal structures of the Eaf3 chromo domain in two truncation forms. Unlike the typical HP1 and Polycomb chromo domains, which contain a large groove to bind the modified histone tail, the Eaf3 chromo domain assumes an autoinhibited chromo barrel domain similar to the human MRG15 chromo domain. Compared with other chromo domains, the Eaf3 chromo domain contains a unique 38-residue insertion that folds into two short beta-strands and a long flexible loop to flank the beta-barrel core. Both isothermal titration calorimetry and surface plasmon resonance studies indicate that the interaction between the Eaf3 chromo domain and the trimethylated H3K36 peptide is relatively weak, with a K(D) of approximately 10(-4) m. NMR titration studies demonstrate that the methylated H3K36 peptide is bound to the cleft formed by the C-terminal alpha-helix and the beta-barrel core. Site-directed mutagenesis study and in vitro binding assay results show that the conserved aromatic residues Tyr-23, Tyr-81, Trp-84, and Trp-88, which form a hydrophobic pocket at one end of the beta-barrel, are essential for the binding of the methylated H3K36. These results reveal the molecular mechanism of the recognition and binding of the methylated H3K36 by Eaf3 and provide new insights into the functional roles of the Eaf3 chromo domain.     

Molecular basis for chromatin assembly and modification by multiprotein complexes

Abstract: Epigenetic regulation of the chromatin landscape is often orchestrated through modulation of nucleosomes. Nucleosomes are composed of two copies each of the four core histones, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, wrapped in ~150 bp of DNA. We focus this review on recent structural studies that further elucidate the mechanisms used by macromolecular complexes to mediate histone modification and nucleosome assembly. Nucleosome assembly, spacing, and variant histone incorporation are coordinated by chromatin remodeler and histone chaperone complexes. Several recent structural studies highlight how disparate families of histone chaperones and chromatin remodelers share similar features that underlie how they interact with their respective histone or nucleosome substrates. Post‐translational modification of histone residues is mediated by enzymatic subunits within large complexes. Until recently, relatively little was known about how association with auxiliary subunits serves to modulate the activity and specificity of the enzymatic subunit. Analysis of several recent structures highlights the different modes that auxiliary subunits use to influence enzymatic activity or direct specificity toward individual histone residues.     

A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, γ‐H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double‐strand break repair

Although recent studies highlight the importance of histone modifications and ATP‐dependent chromatin remodelling in DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair, how these mechanisms cooperate has remained largely unexplored. Here, we show that the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex, earlier known to facilitate the phosphorylation of histone H2AX at Ser‐139 (S139ph) after DNA damage, binds to γ‐H2AX (the phosphorylated form of H2AX)‐containing nucleosomes in S139ph‐dependent manner. Unexpectedly, BRG1, the catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF, binds to γ‐H2AX nucleosomes by interacting with acetylated H3, not with S139ph itself, through its bromodomain. Blocking the BRG1 interaction with γ‐H2AX nucleosomes either by deletion or overexpression of the BRG1 bromodomain leads to defect of S139ph and DSB repair. H3 acetylation is required for the binding of BRG1 to γ‐H2AX nucleosomes. S139ph stimulates the H3 acetylation on γ‐H2AX nucleosomes, and the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 is responsible for this novel crosstalk. The H3 acetylation on γ‐H2AX nucleosomes is induced by DNA damage. These results collectively suggest that SWI/SNF, γ‐H2AX and H3 acetylation cooperatively act in a feedback activation loop to facilitate DSB repair.     

DSIF and RNA polymerase II CTD phosphorylation coordinate the recruitment of Rpd3S to actively transcribed genes

Histone deacetylase Rpd3 is part of two distinct complexes: the large (Rpd3L) and small (Rpd3S) complexes. While Rpd3L targets specific promoters for gene repression, Rpd3S is recruited to ORFs to deacetylate histones in the wake of RNA polymerase II, to prevent cryptic initiation within genes. Methylation of histone H3 at lysine 36 by the Set2 methyltransferase is thought to mediate the recruitment of Rpd3S. Here, we confirm by ChIP-Chip that Rpd3S binds active ORFs. Surprisingly, however, Rpd3S is not recruited to all active genes, and its recruitment is Set2-independent. However, Rpd3S complexes recruited in the absence of H3K36 methylation appear to be inactive. Finally, we present evidence implicating the yeast DSIF complex (Spt4/5) and RNA polymerase II phosphorylation by Kin28 and Ctk1 in the recruitment of Rpd3S to active genes. Taken together, our data support a model where Set2-dependent histone H3 methylation is required for the activation of Rpd3S following its recruitment to the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain.     

Quantifying epigenetic modulation of nucleosome breathing by high-throughput AFM imaging

Nucleosomes are the basic units of chromatin and critical for storage and expression of eukaryotic genomes. Chromatin accessibility and gene readout are heavily regulated by epigenetic marks, in which post-translational modifications of histones play a key role. However, the mode of action and the structural implications at the single-molecule level of nucleosomes is still poorly understood. Here we apply a high-throughput atomic force microscopy imaging and analysis pipeline to investigate the conformational landscape of the nucleosome variants three additional methyl groups at lysine 36 of histone H3 (H3K36me3), phosphorylation of H3 histones at serine 10 (H3S10phos), and acetylation of H4 histones at lysines 5, 8, 12, and 16 (H4K5/8/12/16ac). Our data set of more than 25,000 nucleosomes reveals nucleosomal unwrapping steps corresponding to 5-bp DNA. We find that H3K36me3 nucleosomes unwrap significantly more than wild-type nucleosomes and additionally unwrap stochastically from both sides, similar to centromere protein A (CENP-A) nucleosomes and in contrast to the highly anticooperative unwrapping of wild-type nucleosomes. Nucleosomes with H3S10phos or H4K5/8/12/16ac modifications show unwrapping populations similar to wild-type nucleosomes and also retain the same level of anticooperativity. Our findings help to put the mode of action of these modifications into context. Although H3K36me3 likely acts partially by directly affecting nucleosome structure on the single-molecule level, H3S10phos and H4K5/8/12/16ac must predominantly act through higher-order processes. Our analysis pipeline is readily applicable to other nucleosome variants and will facilitate future high-resolution studies of the conformational landscape of nucleoprotein complexes.