Molecular crowding affects diffusion and binding of nuclear proteins in heterochromatin and reveals the fractal organization of chromatin

The nucleus of eukaryotes is organized into functional compartments, the two most prominent being heterochromatin and nucleoli. These structures are highly enriched in DNA, proteins or RNA, and thus thought to be crowded. In vitro, molecular crowding induces volume exclusion, hinders diffusion and enhances association, but whether these effects are relevant in vivo remains unclear. Here, we establish that volume exclusion and diffusive hindrance occur in dense nuclear compartments by probing the diffusive behaviour of inert fluorescent tracers in living cells. We also demonstrate that chromatin‐interacting proteins remain transiently trapped in heterochromatin due to crowding induced enhanced affinity. The kinetic signatures of these crowding consequences allow us to derive a fractal model of chromatin organization, which explains why the dynamics of soluble nuclear proteins are affected independently of their size. This model further shows that the fractal architecture differs between heterochromatin and euchromatin, and predicts that chromatin proteins use different target‐search strategies in the two compartments. We propose that fractal crowding is a fundamental principle of nuclear organization, particularly of heterochromatin maintenance.     

The response to DNA damage in heterochromatin domains

Eukaryotic genomes are organized into chromatin, divided into structurally and functionally distinct euchromatin and heterochromatin compartments. The high level of compaction and the abundance of repeated sequences in heterochromatin pose multiple challenges for the maintenance of genome stability. Cells have evolved sophisticated and highly controlled mechanisms to overcome these constraints. Here, we summarize recent findings on how the heterochromatic state influences DNA damage formation, signaling, and repair. By focusing on distinct heterochromatin domains in different eukaryotic species, we highlight the heterochromatin contribution to the compartmentalization of DNA damage repair in the cell nucleus and to the repair pathway choice. We also describe the diverse chromatin alterations associated with the DNA damage response in heterochromatin domains and present our current understanding of their regulatory mechanisms. Finally, we discuss the biological significance and the evolutionary conservation of these processes.     

Gold-nanoparticle-assisted laser perturbation of chromatin assembly reveals unusual aspects of nuclear architecture within living cells

Chromatin organization within the nucleus is a vital regulator of genome function, yet its mechanical coupling to the nuclear architecture has remained elusive. To directly investigate this coupling, we locally modulated chromatin structure in living cells using nanoparticle-based laser perturbation. Unusual differences in the response of the cell nucleus were observed depending on the nuclear region that was perturbed--the heterochromatin, the euchromatin, and the nuclear envelope. This response varied under different conditions of cellular perturbations such as ATP depletion, apoptosis, and inhibition of histone deacetylases. Our studies implicate heterochromatin organization in imparting mechanical stability to the cell nucleus and suggest that nuclear size and shape are the result of interplay between nuclear and cytoplasmic anchors.     

Simulating the chromatin-mediated phase separation of model proteins with multiple domains

We perform simulations of a system containing simple model proteins and a polymer representing chromatin. We study the interplay between protein-protein and protein-chromatin interactions, and the resulting condensates that arise due to liquid-liquid phase separation, or a via a “bridging-induced attraction” mechanism. For proteins that interact multivalently, we obtain a phase diagram which includes liquid-like droplets, droplets with absorbed polymer, and coated polymer regimes. Of particular interest is a regime where protein droplets only form due to interaction with the polymer; here, unlike a standard phase separating system, droplet density rather than size varies with the overall protein concentration. We also observe that protein dynamics within droplets slow down as chromatin is absorbed. If the protein-protein interactions have a strictly limited valence, fractal or gel-like condensates are instead observed. A specific example that inspired our model is heterochromatin protein 1, or HP1. Recent in vivo experiments have shown that HP1 exhibits similar droplet size buffering behavior as our simulations. Overall, our results provide biologically relevant insights into the general nature of protein-chromatin condensates in living cells.     

The triploid endosperm genome of Arabidopsis adopts a peculiar, parental-dosage-dependent chromatin organization

The endosperm is a seed tissue unique to flowering plants. Due to its central role in nourishing and protecting the embryo, endosperm development is subject to parental conflicts and adaptive processes, which led to the evolution of parent-of-origin-dependent gene regulation. The role of higher-order chromatin organization in regulating the endosperm genome was long ignored due to technical hindrance. We developed a combination of approaches to analyze nuclear structure and chromatin organization in Arabidopsis thaliana endosperm. Endosperm nuclei showed a less condensed chromatin than other types of nuclei and a peculiar heterochromatin organization, with smaller chromocenters and additional heterochromatic foci interspersed in euchromatin. This is accompanied by a redistribution of the heterochromatin mark H3K9me1 from chromocenters toward euchromatin and interspersed heterochromatin. Thus, endosperm nuclei have a specific nuclear architecture and organization, which we interpret as a relaxed chromocenter-loop model. The analysis of endosperm with altered parental genome dosage indicated that the additional heterochromatin may be predominantly of maternal origin, suggesting differential regulation of maternal and paternal genomes, possibly linked to genome dosage regulation.     

The Influence of Spatial Variation in Chromatin Density Determined by X-Ray Tomograms on the Time to Find DNA Binding Sites

In this work, we examine how volume exclusion caused by regions of high chromatin density might influence the time required for proteins to find specific DNA binding sites. The spatial variation of chromatin density within mouse olfactory sensory neurons is determined from soft X-ray tomography reconstructions of five nuclei. We show that there is a division of the nuclear space into regions of low-density euchromatin and high-density heterochromatin. Volume exclusion experienced by a diffusing protein caused by this varying density of chromatin is modeled by a repulsive potential. The value of the potential at a given point in space is chosen to be proportional to the density of chromatin at that location. The constant of proportionality, called the volume exclusivity, provides a model parameter that determines the strength of volume exclusion. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the mean time for a protein to locate a binding site localized in euchromatin is minimized for a finite, nonzero volume exclusivity. For binding sites in heterochromatin, the mean time is minimized when the volume exclusivity is zero (the protein experiences no volume exclusion). An analytical theory is developed to explain these results. The theory suggests that for binding sites in euchromatin there is an optimal level of volume exclusivity that balances a reduction in the volume searched in finding the binding site, with the height of effective potential barriers the protein must cross during the search process.     

Mesoscale Liquid Model of Chromatin Recapitulates Nuclear Order of Eukaryotes

The nuclear envelope segregates the genome of Eukaryota from the cytoplasm. Within the nucleus, chromatin is further compartmentalized into architectures that change throughout the lifetime of the cell. Epigenetic patterns along the chromatin polymer strongly correlate with chromatin compartmentalization and, accordingly, also change during the cell life cycle and at differentiation. Recently, it has been suggested that subnuclear chromatin compartmentalization might result from a process of liquid-liquid phase separation orchestrated by the epigenetic marking and operated by proteins that bind to chromatin. Here, we translate these observations into a diffuse interface model of chromatin, which we named the mesoscale liquid model of nucleus. Using this streamlined continuum model of the genome, we study the large-scale rearrangements of chromatin that happen at different stages of the growth and senescence of the cell and during nuclear inversion events. In particular, we investigate the role of droplet diffusion, fluctuations, and heterochromatin-lamina interactions during nuclear remodeling. Our results indicate that the physical process of liquid-liquid phase separation, together with surface effects, is sufficient to recapitulate much of the large-scale morphology and dynamics of chromatin along the life cycle of cells.     

HP1gamma associates with euchromatin and heterochromatin in mammalian nuclei and chromosomes

Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) is a nonhistone chromosomal protein, first identified in Drosophila, that plays a dose-dependent role in gene silencing. Three orthologs, HP1alpha, HP1beta, and HP1gamma, have been characterized in mammals. While HP1alpha and HP1beta have been unambiguously localized in heterochromatin by immunocytochemical methods, HP1gamma has been found either exclusively associated with euchromatin or present in both euchromatin and heterochromatin. Here, using an antibody directed against a peptide epitope at the carboxyl-terminal end of the molecule, we localize HP1gamma in both euchromatin and heterochromatin compartments of interphase nuclei, as well as in the pericentromeric chromatin and arms of mitotic chromosomes of 3T3 cells. This dual location was also observed in nuclei expressing HP1gamma as a fusion protein with green fluorescent protein. In contrast, when the distribution of HP1gamma was analyzed with antibodies directed against an amino-terminal epitope, the protein was detectable in euchromatin and not in heterochromatin, except for transient heterochromatin staining during the late S phase, when the heterochromatin undergoes replication. These data suggest that the controversial immunolocalization of HP1gamma in chromatin is due to the use of antibodies directed against topologically distinct epitopes, those present at the amino-terminal end of the molecule being selectively masked in nonreplicative heterochromatin.     

Proteins recognized by antibodies against isolated cytological heterochromatin from rat liver cells change their localization between cell species and between stages of mitosis (interphase vs metaphase)

Heterochromatin in the cell nucleus seems to concentrate various proteins, such as Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1, which maintain the repressed state of gene expression. However, it still remains obscure how protein composition related to chromatin structure is different between heterochromatin and euchromatin in interphase nuclei. We isolated cytological heterochromatin from sonicated interphase nuclei obtained from rat liver cells and prepared antisera against it. The dense heterochromatic bodies seen in the preparation of intact nuclei were duplicated in a relatively pure form during the preparation of heterochromatin. In the sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis, differences between the fractions of heterochromatin and euchromatin were noted by their protein composition. Isolated heterochromatin was then digested by DNase after partial digestion with trypsin and its dense structure changed to become highly sensitive to DNase. The prepared antibodies reacted with the heterochromatin region of rat liver cell nuclei and isolated cytological heterochromatin; however, they did not react with euchromatin. Using immunohistochemistry, the antibodies bound to each cell nucleus in all tissues observed; some cell types were distinguished by their differential stainability (e.g. staining in the cytoplasm). Staining of the mitotic cells showed that the proteins recognized by the antibodies were localized in the cytoplasm and, in part, on the chromosomes. Based on the results of molecular cloning from rat liver cDNA library using the antibodies as a probe, it seemed that the antibodies mainly recognized two proteins similar to arginase and general vesicular transport factor p115, respectively. The results obtained from these experiments reveal that some proteins located in the heterochromatin of interphase liver cell nuclei seem to play important roles in condensing a portion of the chromatin structure during interphase and suggest that proteins composing heterochromatin might be changed according to cell types or the stage of the cell cycle.     

Interactions of mercury and copper with constitutive heterochromatin and euchromatin in vivo and in vitro.

Mouse liver nuclei were fractionated into (condensed) heterochromatin and (noncondensed) euchromatin by differential centrifugation of sonicated nuclei. The fractions were subsequently characterized as unique nuclear species by thermal denaturation derivative profile analysis, which revealed the heterochromatin fraction enriched in satellite DNA and by endogenous metal content, which displayed partitioning of mercury in euchromatin over heterochromatin by a 10:1 ratio, with a comparatively uniform distribution of copper in both fractions. Fractionation of nuclei following in vivo challenge with copper showed enrichment of copper in heterochromatin, relative to euchromatin, while in vivo exposure to mercury resulted in a 20-fold accumulation of mercury in euchromatin, relative to heterochromatin. Using gel filtration and equilibrium dialysis to measure in vitro binding under relatively physiologic conditions of pH (6.0-7.0) and ionic strength (standard saline citrate or saline), the condensed and noncondensed chromatin fractions exhibited binding specificities toward mercury and copper similar to that observed in the in vivo metal challenge experiments. The level of mercury which binds to euchromatin in vitro, when measured either in physiologic [standard saline citrate (SSC)] or in dilute (1:100 SSC) salt solutions, was comparable (approximately 3 mug of Hg/mg of DNA) to that of in vivo euchromatin-bound mercury after 1 month of challenge with dietary metal. In contrast, copper showed little or no preference for the nuclear fractions in dilute salt solutions and displayed patterns which mimic in vivo binding only at higher ionic strengths (saline). Removal of proteins from the chromatin fractions resulted in a loss of binding specificity toward both metals. Therefore, the binding selectivity of condensed and noncondensed chromatin toward both mercury and copper appears to arise from protein or from protein-DNA associations. The state of chromatin condensation is especially critical in the case of copper.     

Sub-nuclear fractionation. I. Procedure and characterization of fractions

A procedure for fractionation of nuclei from rat liver, Xenopus liver and Xenopus erythrocytes is described. It is based on mild sonication of isolated nuclei for 7–12 sec in a nearly isotonic medium, separation of nuclear sap and centrifugation on a discontinuous sucrose density gradient containing Na and K citrate. Nuclei are thus separated in a single operation into 8 fractions representing nucleoplasm, euchromatin, nucleoli, heterochromatin and nuclear membranes. The sub-nuclear fractions were characterized by chemical composition (DNA, protein, RNA and phospholipid), electron microscopy, thermal denaturation properties of chromatin, relative binding of ${}^3\text{H-actinomycin D}$, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of nuclear proteins and titration of membranes against Triton X-100. Approx. 10% of total DNA was recovered as heterochromatin associated with membranes but the bulk of nuclear membranes co-sedimented with the major euchromatin zones. Subnuclear fractions prepared in this way retain virtually all the RNA polymerase activity bound to chromatin [41].     

Progressive polycomb assembly on H3K27me3 compartments generates polycomb bodies with developmentally regulated motion

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are conserved chromatin factors that maintain silencing of key developmental genes outside of their expression domains. Recent genome-wide analyses showed a Polycomb (PC) distribution with binding to discrete PcG response elements (PREs). Within the cell nucleus, PcG proteins localize in structures called PC bodies that contain PcG-silenced genes, and it has been recently shown that PREs form local and long-range spatial networks. Here, we studied the nuclear distribution of two PcG proteins, PC and Polyhomeotic (PH). Thanks to a combination of immunostaining, immuno-FISH, and live imaging of GFP fusion proteins, we could analyze the formation and the mobility of PC bodies during fly embryogenesis as well as compare their behavior to that of the condensed fraction of euchromatin. Immuno-FISH experiments show that PC bodies mainly correspond to 3D structural counterparts of the linear genomic domains identified in genome-wide studies. During early embryogenesis, PC and PH progressively accumulate within PC bodies, which form nuclear structures localized on distinct euchromatin domains containing histone H3 tri-methylated on K27. Time-lapse analysis indicates that two types of motion influence the displacement of PC bodies and chromatin domains containing H2Av-GFP. First, chromatin domains and PC bodies coordinately undergo long-range motions that may correspond to the movement of whole chromosome territories. Second, each PC body and chromatin domain has its own fast and highly constrained motion. In this motion regime, PC bodies move within volumes slightly larger than those of condensed chromatin domains. Moreover, both types of domains move within volumes much smaller than chromosome territories, strongly restricting their possibility of interaction with other nuclear structures. The fast motion of PC bodies and chromatin domains observed during early embryogenesis strongly decreases in late developmental stages, indicating a possible contribution of chromatin dynamics in the maintenance of stable gene silencing.