The maryland mammoth allele and rooting both perturb the fate of florally determined apices in Nicotiana tabacum.

The stability of the florally determined state in terminal and axillary buds of two tobacco cultivars was studied. We used Hicks and Hicks Maryland Mammoth, near-isogenic cultivars of Nicotiana tabacum differing at the recessive maryland mammoth locus which confers short-day behavior. The experimental design consisted of growing plants in short-day conditions and subjecting them to three bioassays in long-day conditions: in vitro culture of apices consisting of meristems and three to four leaf primordia; rooting of buds consisting of meristems and 8 to 12 leaves, leaf primordia, and internodes; and release from apical dominance of axillary buds in situ. Cultured terminal and axillary apices expressed floral determination, indicating that meristems can be florally determined. Two lines of evidence indicate that rooting destabilizes an already acquired florally determined state: cultured apices from both axillary and terminal buds produced fewer nodes after excision than homologous buds which were rooted; and a lower percentage of rooted axillary buds from Hicks Maryland Mammoth plants expressed floral determination than did homologous axillary buds grown out in situ in noninductive conditions. Rooted buds from the two genotypes expressed floral determination at different frequencies, but produced abnormal inflorescences at similar frequencies, indicating that roots and the maryland mammoth allele influence common as well as unique processes associated with floral determination.     

Floral determination in the terminal bud of the short-day plant Pharbitis nil

Temporal and spatial aspects of floral determination in seedling terminal buds of the qualitative short-day plant Pharbitis nil were examined using a grafting assay. Floral determination in the terminal buds of 6-day-old P. nil seedlings is rapid; by 9 hr after the end of a 14-hr inductive dark period more than 50% of the induced terminal buds grafted onto uninduced stock plants produced a full complement of flower buds. When grafted at early times after the end of the dark period the terminal buds of induced plants produced three discrete populations of plants: plants with no flowers, plants with two axillary flowers at nodes 3 and 4 and a vegetative terminal shoot apex, and plants with five to seven flowers including a terminal flower. The temporal relationship among these populations of plants produced by apices grafted at different times indicates that under our conditions, the region of the terminal bud that will form the axillary buds at nodes 3 and 4 becomes florally determined prior to floral determination of the region of the terminal bud giving rise to the nodes above node 4.     

Floral determination in axillary buds of Nicotiana silvestris

At anthesis of the terminal flower the developmental fates of axillary buds of the long-day plant Nicotiana silvestris were assessed in situ and in isolation. The in situ developmental fate was assessed by decapitating the plant above the bud in question and letting the bud mature. The developmental fate of isolated buds was assessed by removing the bud from the main axis, rooting it, and letting it mature. The number of nodes below the terminal flower of the mature shoot was indicative of the developmental fate of the bud. Terminal meristems of rooted axillary buds exhibited two patterns of development: (1) Their developmental fate was the same as that of in situ buds at the same node or (2) their developmental fate was the same as that of seed-derived plants. For example, terminal meristems of rooted buds from the fourth node below the inflorescence produced either 15 to 19 nodes or 36 to 40 nodes. In situ fourth buds produced 12 to 14 nodes while seed-derived plants produced 33 to 39 nodes. Terminal meristems of rooted axillary buds that exhibited the same developmental fate as that of in situ buds were determined for floral development. Although determined buds produced a terminal flower, all but one had abnormal inflorescences. That is, in the place of floral branches determined buds produced vegetative branches. Four buds that were not determined for floral development had their shoot tips rooted each time the plant bolted. Only when the plants were allowed to grow without being rerooted did they flower. These results indicate that roots may prevent and/or destabilize floral determination in N. silvestris.     

Determination for inflorescence development is a stable state,separable from determination for flower development in Pisum sativum L. buds

Terminal meristems of Pisum sativum (garden pea) transit from vegetative to inflorescence development, and begin producing floral axillary meristems. Determination for inflorescence development was assessed by culturing excised buds and meristems. The first node of floral initiation (NFI) for bud expiants developing in culture and for adventitious shoots forming on cultured meristems was compared with the NFI of intact control buds. When terminal buds having eight leaf primordia were excised from plants of different ages (i.e., number of unfolded leaves) and cultured on 6-benzylaminopurine and kinetin-supplemented medium, the NFI was a function of the age of the source plant. By age 3, all terminal buds were determined for inflorescence development. Determination occurred at least eight nodes before the first axillary flower was initiated. Thus, the axillary meristems contributing to the inflorescence had not formed at the time the bud was explanted. Similar results were obtained for cultured axillary buds. In addition, meristems excised without leaf primordia from axillary buds three nodes above the cotyledons of age-3 plants gave rise to adventitious buds with an NFI of 8.3 ±0.3 nodes. In contrast seed-derived plants had an NFI of 16.5 ±0.2. Thus cells within the meristem were determined for inflorescence development. These findings indicate that determination for inflorescence development in P. sativum is a stable developmental state, separable from determination for flower development, and occurring prior to initiation of the inflorescence at the level of meristems.     

Developmental physiology of floral initiation in Nicotiana tabacum L.

The central process in the making of a multicellular organismis the fating of cells and tissues for their terminal phenotypes.The formation of a flower from a shoot apical meristem completesa sequence of fating processes initiated in embryogenesis. Thefating of a vegetative meristem of Nicotiana tabacum L. to initiatea flower involves at least two signals and two developmentalstates. A signal from the roots maintains vegetative growth,or prevents flowering, in the young seedling. As the plant grows,the vegetative meristem gains greater competence to respondto the floral stimulus from the leaves until it is evoked, byfloral stimulus, into a florally determined state. The florallydetermined state is then expressed. These developmental processesnot only establish the time of floral initiation, but also regulateplant size as measured by the number of nodes produced. Key words: Plant size, floral stimulus, competence, floral determination, induction     

Induction and floral determination in the terminal bud of Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Maryland Mammoth,a short-day plant

Floral determination in the terminal bud of the short-day plant Nicotiana tabacum cv. Maryland Mammoth has been investigated. Plants grown continuously in short days flowered after producing 31.4±1.6 (SD) nodes while plants grown continuously in long days did not flower and produced 172.5±9.5 nodes after one year. At various ages, expressed as number of leaves that were at least 1.0 cm in length above the most basal 10-cm leaf, one of three treatments was performed on plants grown from seed in short days: 1) whole plants were shifted from short days to long days, 2) the terminal bud was removed and then rooted and grown in long days, and 3) the terminal bud was removed and then rooted and grown in short days. Whole plants flowered only when shifted from short days to long days at age 15 or later. Only rooted terminal buds from plants at age 15 or older produced plants that flowered when grown in long days. Only terminal buds from plants at age 15 or older that were rooted and grown in short days produced the same number of nodes as they would have produced in their original locations while buds from younger plants produced more nodes than they would have in their original locations. Thus, determination for floral development in the terminal bud, as assayed by rooting, is simultaneous with the commitment to flowering as assayed by shifting whole plants to non-inductive conditions.Abbreviations LD long day(s) - SD short day(s) - DN dayneutral     

Influence des corrélations entre organes sur la croissance et le développement floral des bourgeons cotylédonaires chez leScrofularia arguta Sol.

The importance of various correlative influences on growth and vegetative or floral development of cotyledonary buds inScrofularia arguta Sol. is shown. The terminal bud, on the one hand, inhibits growth of cotyledonary buds and, on the other hand, induces their early flowering. The cotyledon stimulates growth of its axillary bud, but has no action on its floral development. Leaves above the cotyledonary node have the same effect as the cotyledon. Finally, roots stimulate vegetative growth of cotyledonary buds and suppress floral expression, but only when apical dominance has been removed at an early stage of development.     

Erratum

The number of nodes produced by a bud meristem before differentiation into a flower is defined as its developmental potential. Decapitation, rooting, and grafting experiments were used to measure the developmental potential of the vegetative axillary bud meristems on Nicotiana tabacum. Decapitation experiments measure the in situ developmental potential while rooting and grafting experiments measure developmental potential in isolation and at a new location on the organism, respectively. A rooted or grafted bud exhibits one of two patterns of development: (1) It develops like an in situ bud or (2) It develops according to its new environment. For example, second axillary buds below the inflorescence produced 18.8 ± 0.8 nodes in situ, 17.9 ± 0.9 or 39.8 ± 1.1 nodes when rooted, and 22.2 ± 0.6 or 34.2 ± 0.7 nodes when grafted to the base of the plant. These results suggest that the buds which develop like in situ buds are developmentally determined while buds that develop according to their new environment are undetermined. On an individual plant, determined and undetermined buds are separated by one internode and only first, second, and third buds below the inflorescence exhibit determination.     

A COMPARATIVE DEVELOPMENTAL STUDY OF THE MUTANT SIDESHOOTLESS AND NORMAL TOMATO PLANTS

'Sideshootless,’ a mutant strain of tomato which does not produce axillary buds during vegetative growth, was compared with normally branching plants in order to study the nature of development particularly with regard to axillary buds. Sectioned material revealed no indication of axillary bud initiation in the sideshootless plant at any time during the vegetative phase of growth. In the normal plants, buds were noted to arise in the axil of the fifth youngest leaf. The buds take their origin in tissue which is in direct continuity with the apical meristem. The bud primordia later become set apart from the apex as vacuolation takes place in the surrounding tissue. At the time of floral initiation, the mutant and normal strains behave similarly. Axillary buds appear in the axils of the 2 leaves immediately below the floral apex. One of the buds elongates to overtop the existing plant axis; the other develops as a typical sidebranch. The inflorescence is pushed aside in the process. This pattern is repeated with each inflorescence; thus an axis composed of several superimposed laterals results.     

秋水仙素浓度和处理时间对茉莉腋芽生长发育的影响

为了解秋水仙素处理对茉莉﹝Jasminum sambac (Linn.) Aiton〕腋芽生长发育的影响,以长度为0(未萌发)、3~5和8~10 mm腋芽为实验材料,对500、1000和2000 mg·L-1秋水仙素溶液分别处理24和48 h后腋芽的生长状况以及萌发枝条和叶片的生长和发育状况进行分析,同时,对各处理组花粉母细胞的减数分裂行为进行观察;在此基础上,对秋水仙素处理后茉莉腋芽及萌发枝条的各生物学效应指标进行相关性分析。结果显示：经秋水仙素处理后,各处理组腋芽的生长率和处理指数,以及萌发枝条的长度、最大节间长、最大叶长、最大叶宽、现蕾数、现蕾率、最大蕾长、最大蕾宽和开花率总体上显著(P<0.05)低于对照组(用清水处理未萌发腋芽48 h),而腋芽的抑制率和死亡率显著高于对照组。总体上看,随秋水仙素质量浓度提高,腋芽的生长率和处理指数降低,而抑制率和死亡率升高,萌发枝条的长度和最大节间长缩短,开花率升高,其他指标呈波动变化;随处理时间延长,腋芽的生长率、死亡率和处理指数降低,但抑制率升高,萌发枝条仅现蕾数和开花率降低,其他指标均逐渐提高;随腋芽长度增加,腋芽的抑制率和处理指数降低,但死亡率升高,萌发枝条的现蕾率、现蕾数、最大蕾长和开花率均呈波动变化,其他指标均降低。经秋水仙素处理后,茉莉花粉母细胞在减数分裂过程中存在落后染色体、染色体桥和微核等异常现象,且随秋水仙素质量浓度和腋芽长度增加及处理时间延长,减数分裂后期的细胞异常率逐渐升高。相关性分析结果显示：细胞异常率与腋芽生长率呈显著负相关,与腋芽死亡率呈极显著正相关;腋芽生长率与腋芽抑制率和开花率分别呈显著和极显著(P<0.01)负相关;腋芽抑制率与现蕾率呈显著正相关;处理指数与细胞异常率呈极显著负相关。研究结果表明：秋水仙素浓度和处理时间对茉莉腋芽的生长发育有一定影响;综合考虑各生物学效应指标,茉莉腋芽适宜的诱导条件为用500 mg·L-1秋水仙素溶液处理3~5 mm腋芽24 h。此外,建议将处理指数作为秋水仙素对茉莉腋芽细胞减数分裂影响效应的评价指标之一。     

Development of Meristems of Weigela florida Variety 'Bristol Ruby' Following Reproductive Induction in Long Days

Weigela florida variety ‘Bristol Ruby’ has longday requirements for its growth and, in general, for its flowering.Vegetative development, floral initiation and floral organogenesisare described using scanning electron microscopy during photoperiodictreatment in long days, under controlled conditions. Flowering of axillary buds of cuttings has been studied. Theapex of Weigela at the vegetative phase is characterized bya very small hollow meristem. After 9 long days, the meristemenlarges and, after 12 long days, early axillary buds are initiatedin the axils of the leaves, which become bracts. When the numberof long days was increased, flowers were initiated in the budson the induced branches; first at the proximal part of the branchwhere development afterwards slowed down, then on the medianparts of the branch where development was accelerated. Two bracteoles are differentiated soon after floral initiation;first initiation of the calyx required 18 long days. Petals,stamens and ovary were rapidly initiated after that. Weigelaflowers are clustered; the inflorescence ceased growth by abortionof the terminal meristem or by formation of a terminal flower.In axillary buds of the fifth node the formation of the clusterwas completed about 20 days after the beginning of floral induction. Weigela florida ‘Bristol Ruby’, scanning electron microscopic analysis, vegetative meristem, floral development stages, long days induction     

NODE COUNTING IN AXILLARY BUDS OF NICOTIANA TABACUM CV. WISCONSIN 38, A DAY-NEUTRAL PLANT

A mature, quiescent, primary axillary bud on the main axis of a flowering Nicotiana tabacum cv. Wisconsin 38 plant, when released from apical dominance and before forming its terminal flower, produced a number of nodes which was dependent upon its position on the main axis. Each bud produced about one more node than the next bud above it. The total number of nodes produced by an axillary bud was about 6 to 8 greater than the number of nodes present above this bud on the main axis. At anthesis of the terminal flower on the main axis, mature, quiescent, primary axillary buds had initiated 7 to 9 leaf primordia while secondary axillary buds, sometimes present in addition to the primary ones, had initiated 4 to 5 leaf primordia. When permitted to grow out independently, primary and secondary axillary buds located at the same node on the main axis produced the same number of nodes before forming their terminal flowers. In contrast, immature primary axillary buds which had produced only 5 leaf primordia and which were released from apical dominance prior to the formation of flowers on the main axis produced only as many nodes as would be produced above them on the main axis by the terminal meristem, i.e., “extra” nodes were not produced. Therefore, it is the physiological status of the plant and not the number of nodes on the bud at the time of release from apical dominance that influenced the node-counting process of a bud. When two axillary buds were permitted to develop on the same main axis, each produced the same number of nodes as single axillary buds developing at these nodes. Thus, the counting process in an axillary bud of tobacco is independent of other buds. Axillary buds on main axes of plants that had been placed horizontally produced the same number of nodes as identically-positioned axillary buds on vertical plants, indicating that gravity does not play a major role in the counting, by an axillary bud, of the nodes on the main axis.     

Effect of Assimilate Supply on Development and Growth Potential of Axillary Buds in Roses

The effect of assimilate supply on axillary bud developmentand subsequent shoot growth was investigated in roses. Differencesin assimilate supply were imposed by differential defoliation.Fresh and dry mass of axillary buds increased with increasedassimilate supply. The growth potential of buds was studiedeither by pruning the parent shoot above the bud, by graftingthe bud or by culturing the bud in vitro. Time until bud breakwas not clearly affected by assimilate supply during bud development,Increase in assimilate supply slightly increased the numberof leaves and leaf primordia in the bud; the number of leavespreceding the flower on the shoot grown from the axillary budsubstantially increased. No difference was found in the numberof leaves preceding the flower on shoots grown from buds attachedto the parent shoot and those from buds grafted on a cutting,indicating that at the moment of release from inhibition thebud meristem became determined to produce a specific numberof leaves and to develop into a flower. Assimilate supply duringaxillary bud development increased the number of pith cells,but the final size of the pith in the subsequent shoot was largelydetermined by cell enlargement, which was dependent on assimilatesupply during shoot growth. Shoot growth after release frominhibition was affected by assimilate supply during axillarybud development only when buds sprouted attached to the parentshoot, indicating that shoot growth is, to a major extent, dependenton the assimilate supply available while growth is taking place.Copyright1994, 1999 Academic Press Assimilate supply, axillary bud, cell number, cell size, defoliation, development, growth potential, meristem programming, pith, Rosa hybrida, rose, shoot growth     

Florigen is involved in axillary bud development at multiple stages in Arabidopsis

The wide variety of plant architectures is largely based on diverse and flexible modes of axillary shoot development. In Arabidopsis, floral transition (flowering) stimulates axillary bud development. The mechanism that links flowering and axillary bud development is, however, largely unknown. We recently showed that FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) protein, which acts as florigen, promotes the phase transition of axillary meristems, whereas BRANCHED1 (BRC1) antagonizes the florigen action in axillary buds. Here, we present evidences for another possible role of florigen in axillary bud development. Ectopic overexpression of FT or another florigen gene TWIN SISTER OF FT (TSF) with LEAFY (LFY) induces ectopic buds at cotyledonary axils, confirming the previous proposal that these genes are involved in formation of axillary buds. Taken together with our previous report that florigen promotes axillary shoot elongation, we propose that florigen regulates axillary bud development at multiple stages to coordinate it with flowering in Arabidopsis.     

Shoot morphogenesis associated with flowering in Populus deltoides (Salicaceae)

Temporal and spatial formation and differentiation of axillary buds in developing shoots of mature eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) were investigated. Shoots sequentially initiate early vegetative, floral, and late vegetative buds. Associated with these buds is the formation of three distinct leaf types. In May of the first growing season, the first type begins forming in terminal buds and overwinters as relatively developed foliar structures. These leaves bear early vegetative buds in their axils. The second type forms late in the first growing season in terminal buds. These leaves form floral buds in their axils the second growing season. The floral bud meristems initiate scale leaves in April and begin forming floral meristems in the axils of the bracts in May. The floral meristems subsequently form floral organs by the end of the second growing season. The floral buds overwinter with floral organs, and anthesis occurs in the third growing season. The third type of leaf forms and develops entirely outside the terminal buds in the second growing season. These leaves bear the late vegetative buds in their axils. On the basis of these and other supporting data, we hypothesize a 3-yr flowering cycle as opposed to the traditional 2-yr cycle in eastern cottonwood.     

Development and Growth Potential of Axillary Buds in Roses as Affected by Bud Age

The effect of axillary bud age on the development and potentialfor growth of the bud into a shoot was studied in roses. Ageof the buds occupying a similar position on the plant variedfrom 'subtending leaf just unfolded' up to 1 year later. Withincreasing age of the axillary bud its dry mass, dry-matterpercentage and number of leaves, including leaf primordia, increased.The apical meristem of the axillary bud remained vegetativeas long as subjected to apical dominance, even for 1 year. The potential for growth of buds was studied either by pruningthe parent shoot above the bud, by grafting the bud or by culturingthe bud in vitro. When the correlative inhibition (i.e. dominationof the apical region over the axillary buds) was released, additionalleaves and eventually a flower formed. The number of additionalleaves decreased with increasing bud age and became more orless constant for axillary buds of shoots beyond the harvestablestage, while the total number of leaves preceding the flowerincreased. An increase in bud age was reflected in a greaternumber of scales, including transitional leaves, and in a greaternumber of non-elongated internodes of the subsequent shoot.Time until bud break slightly decreased with increasing budage; it was long, relatively, for 1 year old buds, when theysprouted attached to the parent shoot. Shoot length, mass andleaf area were not clearly affected by the age of the bud thatdeveloped into the shoot. With increasing bud age the numberof pith cells in the subsequent shoot increased, indicatinga greater potential diameter of the shoot. However, final diameterwas dependent on the assimilate supply after bud break. Axillarybuds obviously need a certain developmental stage to be ableto break. When released from correlative inhibition at an earlierstage, increased leaf initiation occurs before bud break.Copyright1994, 1999 Academic Press Age, axillary bud, cell number, cell size, pith, shoot growth, Rosa hybrida, rose     

Relative importance of nodal roots and apical buds in the control of branching in Trifolium repens L.

Clonal species are characterised by having a growth form in which roots and shoots originate from the same meristem so that adventitious nodal roots form close to the terminal apical bud of stems. The nature of the relationship between nodal roots and axillary bud growth was investigated in three manipulative experiments on cuttings of a single genotype of Trifolium repens. In the absence of locally positioned nodal roots axillary bud development within the apical bud proceeded normally until it slowed once the subtending leaf had matured to be the second expanded leaf on the stem. Excision of apical tissues indicated that while there was no apical dominance apparent within fully rooted stems and very little in stems with 15 or more unrooted nodes, the outgrowth of the two most distal axillary buds was stimulated by decapitation in stems with intermediate numbers of unrooted nodes. Excision of the basal branches from stems growing without local nodal roots markedly increased the length and/or number of leaves on 14 distally positioned branches. The presence of basal branches therefore prevented the translocation of root-supplied resources (nutrients, water, phytohormones) to the more distally located nodes and this caused the retardation in the outgrowth of their axillary buds. Based on all three experiments we conclude that the primary control of bud outgrowth is exerted by roots via the acropetal transport of root-supplied resources necessary for axillary bud outgrowth and that apical dominance plays a very minor role in the regulation of axillary bud outgrowth in T. repens.     

Preformation of Node Number in Vegetative and Reproductive Proleptic Shoot Modules of Persea (Lauraceae)

The numbers of nodes on single flush terminal and axillary shootmodules were determined in a range of Persea species and cultivars.They were compared with node numbers in apical and axillarybuds to investigate whether preformation or neoformation ofnodes occurred. Mean number of nodes on terminal shoots was14 for vegetative shoot modules and 21 for reproductive shootmodules, and was similar across species, cultivars, rootstocks,locations and climates. In the cultivar 'Hass', numbers of nodeson axillary shoot modules were variable, and lower than thosefor primary shoot modules forming the dominant growth axis ofannual growth modules. There was a mean of 12 nodes for vegetativeproleptic shoot modules, 15 for reproductive proleptic shootmodules and six for sylleptic shoot modules, which were invariablyvegetative. All nodes were preformed within both apical andaxillary proleptic buds. This was not the case in syllepticbuds, which burst contemporaneously with extension of the parentaxis. The majority (63%) of reproductive buds formed indeterminatecompound inflorescences. They carried six basal bud scales,six axillary inflorescences and their subtending bracts, andup to nine true leaves.Copyright 1994, 1999 Academic Press Persea Clus., avocado, Persea americana Mill., bud morphology, shoot growth, preformation, prolepsis     

Dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in developing leaves, bracts and floral buds of cotton

Development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) squares (i.e. floral buds with bracts) is fundamental for yield formation. A 2-year field study was conducted to determine dry weight (DW) accumulations of cotton leaves, floral bracts and floral buds, and the changes in concentrations of non-structural carbohydrates (hexoses, sucrose and starch) in these tissues during square ontogeny as affected by fruiting positions within the plant canopy. During square development, DW accumulation of a subtending sympodial leaf and floral bracts followed a sigmoid growth curve with increasing square age, whereas the DW increase of a floral bud followed an exponential curve. Main-stem node (Node 8, 10 or 12) and branch position (proximal vs. distal) within a plant canopy significantly affected DW accumulations of the leaf, bracts and floral bud. Starch was the dominant non-structural carbohydrate in the three tissues, accounting for more than 65% of total non-structural carbohydrates (TNC). Subtending leaf TNC increased as square age increased. The bracts exhibited a smaller change in TNC than leaves. Non-structural carbohydrate concentration was the lowest in 10-day-old floral buds, and had little change during the first 15 days of square development. Within 5 days prior to anthesis, the floral-bud TNC increased dramatically, tripling at the time of floral anthesis compared with 15-day-old floral buds. Square age and fruiting position significantly affected non-structural carbohydrate concentrations of subtending leaves, bracts, and floral buds. The correlation did not exist between final boll retention and non-structural carbohydrate concentrations of floral buds at different fruiting positions under normal growth conditions. The pattern of floral-bud non-structural carbohydrates during square ontogeny suggests that major events in carbohydrate metabolism occur just prior to anthesis.     

Periods of organogenesis in shoots of Nothofagus dombeyi (Mirb.) oersted (Nothofagaceae)

The organogenetic cycle of main-branch shoots of Nothofagus dombeyi (Nothofagaceae) was studied. Twelve samples of 52-59 parent shoots were collected from a roadside population between September 1999 and October 2000. Variations over time in the number of nodes of terminal and axillary buds, and the length, diameter and number of leaves of shoots derived from these buds (sibling shoots) were analysed. The number of nodes of buds developed by parent shoots was compared with the number of nodes of buds developed, I year later, by sibling shoots. The length, diameter and number of leaves of sibling shoots increased from October 1999 to February 2000 in those shoots with a terminal bud. However, extension of most sibling shoots, including the first five most distal leaf primordia, ceased before February due to abscission of the shoot apex. Axillary buds located most distally on a shoot had more nodes than both terminal buds and more proximal axillary buds. The longest shoots included a preformed part and a neoformed part. The organogenetic event which initiated the neoformed organs continued until early autumn, giving rise to the following year's preformation. The absence of cataphylls in terminal buds could indicate a low intensity of shoot rest. The naked terminal bud of Nothofagus spp. could be interpreted as a structure less specialized than the scaled bud found in genera of Fagaceae and Betulaceae.