Recombinant adenovirus-mediated p14(ARF) overexpression sensitizes human breast cancer cells to cisplatin

p14(ARF), the alternative product from the human INK4a/ARF locus, is one of the major targets for alterations in the development of human cancers. Overexpression of p14(ARF) results in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. To examine the potential therapeutic role of re-expressing p14(ARF) gene product in human breast cancer, a recombinant adenovirus expressing the human p14(ARF) cDNA (Adp14(ARF)) was constructed and used to infect breast cancer cells. Five days after infection, Adp14(ARF) had considerable cytotoxicity on p53-wild-type MCF-7 cells. A time-course study showed that Adp14(ARF) infection of MCF-7 cells at 100pfu/cell increased the number of cells in G0/G1 phase and decreased that in S and G2/M phases. The presence of apoptotic cells was confirmed using the TUNEL assay. Adp14(ARF)-mediated expression of p14(ARF) also resulted in a considerable increase in the amounts of p53 and its target proteins, p21(WAF1) and MDM2. Furthermore, the combination treatment of MCF-7 cells with Adp14(ARF) and cisplatin resulted in a significantly greater cell death. Together, we conclude that p14(ARF) plays an important role in the induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in breast cancer cells and recombinant adenovirus-mediated p14(ARF) expression greatly increases the sensitivity of these cells to cisplatin. These results demonstrate that the proper combination of Adp14(ARF) with conventional chemotherapeutic drug(s) could have potential benefits in treating breast cancer that carries wild-type p53 gene.     

CARF is a novel protein that cooperates with mouse p19ARF (human p14ARF) in activating p53

The INK4a locus on chromosome 9p21 encodes two structurally distinct tumor suppressor proteins, p16(INK4a) and the alternative reading frame protein, ARF (p19(ARF) in mouse and p14(ARF) in human). Each of these proteins has a role in senescence of primary cells and activates pathways for cell cycle control and tumor suppression. The current prevailing model proposes that p19(ARF) activates p53 function by antagonizing its degradation by MDM2. It was, however, recently shown that stabilization of p53 by p14(ARF) occurs independent of the relocalization of MDM2 to the nucleolus. We have identified a novel collaborator of ARF, CARF. It co-localizes and interacts with ARF in the nucleolus. We demonstrate that CARF is co-regulated with ARF, cooperates with it in activating p53, and thus acts as a novel component of the ARF-p53-p21 pathway.     

Role of p14(ARF) in replicative and induced senescence of human fibroblasts

Following a proliferative phase of variable duration, most normal somatic cells enter a growth arrest state known as replicative senescence. In addition to telomere shortening, a variety of environmental insults and signaling imbalances can elicit phenotypes closely resembling senescence. We used p53(-/-) and p21(-/-) human fibroblast cell strains constructed by gene targeting to investigate the involvement of the Arf-Mdm2-p53-p21 pathway in natural as well as premature senescence states. We propose that in cell types that upregulate p21 during replicative exhaustion, such as normal human fibroblasts, p53, p21, and Rb act sequentially and constitute the major pathway for establishing growth arrest and that the telomere-initiated signal enters this pathway at the level of p53. Our results also revealed a number of significant differences between human and rodent fibroblasts in the regulation of senescence pathways.     

Contribution of two independent MDM2-binding domains in p14(ARF) to p53 stabilization

The MDM2 protein targets the p53 tumor suppressor for ubiquitin-dependent degradation [1], and can function both as an E3 ubiquitin ligase [2] and as a regulator of the subcellular localization of p53 [3]. Oncogene activation stabilizes p53 through expression of the ARF protein (p14(ARF) in humans, p19(ARF) in the mouse) [4], and loss of ARF allows tumor development without loss of wild-type p53 [5] [6]. ARF binds directly to MDM2, and prevents MDM2 from targeting p53 for degradation [6] [7] [8] [9] by inhibiting the E3 ligase activity of MDM2 [2] and preventing nuclear export of MDM2 and p53 [10] [11]. Interaction between ARF and MDM2 results in the localization of both proteins to the nucleolus [12] [13] [14] through nucleolar localization signals (NoLS) in ARF and MDM2 [11] [12] [13] [14]. Here, we report a new NoLS within the highly conserved amino-terminal 22 amino acids of p14(ARF), a region that we found could interact with MDM2, relocalize MDM2 to the nucleolus and inhibit the ability of MDM2 to degrade p53. In contrast, the carboxy-terminal fragment of p14(ARF), which contains the previously described NoLS [11], did not drive nucleolar localization of MDM2, although this region could bind MDM2 and weakly inhibit its ability to degrade p53. Our results support the importance of nucleolar sequestration for the efficient inactivation of MDM2. The inhibition of MDM2 by a small peptide from the amino terminus of p14(ARF) might be exploited to restore p53 function in tumors.     

Regulation of p14ARF Through Subnuclear Compartmentalization

The p53-mediated pathway cell cycle arrest and apoptosis is central to cancer and an important point of focus for therapeutics development. The p14ARF ("ARF") tumor suppressor induces the p53 pathway in response to oncogene activation or DNA damage. However, ARF is predominantly nucleolar in localization and engages in several interactions with nucleolar proteins, whereas p53 is nucleoplasmic. This raises the question as to how ARF initiates its involvement in the p53 pathway. We have found that UV irradiation of cells disrupts the interaction of ARF with two of its nucleolar binding partners, B23(NPM, nucleophosmin, NO38, numatrin) and topoisomerase I, and promotes an immediate and transient subnuclear redistribution of ARF to the nucleoplasm, where it can engage the p53 pathway (Lee et al, Cancer Research 65:9834-42; 2005). The results support a model in which the nucleolus serves as a p53 upstream sensor of cellular stress, and add to a growing body of evidence that nucleolar sequestration of ARF prevents activation of p53. The results also have therapeutic implications for therapies based on exploiting p53 and other cellular stress response pathways to suppress cancer.     

Rlp7p is associated with 60S preribosomes,restricted to the granular component of the nucleolus,and required for pre-rRNA processing

Many analyses have examined subnucleolar structures in eukaryotic cells, but the relationship between morphological structures, pre-rRNA processing, and ribosomal particle assembly has remained unclear. Using a visual assay for export of the 60S ribosomal subunit, we isolated a ts-lethal mutation, rix9-1, which causes nucleolar accumulation of an Rpl25p-eGFP reporter construct. The mutation results in a single amino acid substitution (F176S) in Rlp7p, an essential nucleolar protein related to ribosomal protein Rpl7p. The rix9-1 (rlp7-1) mutation blocks the late pre-RNA cleavage at site C2 in ITS2, which separates the precursors to the 5.8S and 25S rRNAs. Consistent with this, synthesis of the mature 5.8S and 25S rRNAs was blocked in the rlp7-1 strain at nonpermissive temperature, whereas 18S rRNA synthesis continued. Moreover, pre-rRNA containing ITS2 accumulates in the nucleolus of rix9-1 cells as revealed by in situ hybridization. Finally, tagged Rlp7p was shown to associate with a pre-60S particle, and fluorescence microscopy and immuno-EM localized Rlp7p to a subregion of the nucleolus, which could be the granular component (GC). All together, these data suggest that pre-rRNA cleavage at site C2 specifically requires Rlp7p and occurs within pre-60S particles located in the GC region of the nucleolus.     

A small ribosomal subunit (SSU) processome component, the human U3 protein 14A (hUTP14A) binds p53 and promotes p53 degradation

Ribosome biogenesis is required for normal cell function, and aberrant ribosome biogenesis can lead to p53 activation. However, how p53 is activated by defects of ribosome biogenesis remains to be determined. Here, we identified human UTP14a as an SSU processome component by showing that hUTP14a is nucleolar, associated with U3 snoRNA and involved in 18 S rRNA processing. Interestingly, ectopic expression of hUTP14a resulted in a decrease and knockdown of hUTP14a led to an increase of p53 protein levels. We showed that hUTP14a physically interacts with p53 and functionally promotes p53 turn-over, and that hUTP14a promotion of p53 destabilization is sensitive to a proteasome inhibitor but independent of ubiquitination. Significantly, knockdown of hUTP14a led to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Our data identified a novel pathway for p53 activation through a defect in rRNA processing and suggest that a ribosome biogenesis factor itself could act as a sensor for nucleolar stress to regulate p53.     

Mutations in the INK4a/ARF melanoma susceptibility locus functionally impair p14ARF

The INK4a/ARF locus encodes two cell cycle regulatory proteins, the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p16(INK4a), and the p53 activator, p14(ARF). Germline mutations in this locus are associated with melanoma susceptibility in 20-40% of multiple case melanoma families. Many of these mutations specifically impair p16(INK4a), whereas mutations uniquely targeting p14(ARF) are rare. Nevertheless, the importance of p14(ARF) has not been excluded because more than 40% of INK4a/ARF alterations affect p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF). We now report that p14(ARF) is functionally impaired in melanoma kindreds carrying INK4a/ARF mutations. Of the seven INK4a/ARF mutations tested, three altered the subcellular distribution of p14(ARF) and diminished the ability of p14(ARF) to activate the p53 pathway. This work establishes the importance of p14(ARF) in melanoma predisposition.     

MDM2-Mediated Degradation of p14ARF: A Novel Mechanism to Control ARF Levels in Cancer Cells

We here show a new relationship between the human p14ARF oncosuppressor and the MDM2 oncoprotein. MDM2 overexpression in various cancer cell lines causes p14ARF reduction inducing its degradation through the proteasome. The effect does not require the ubiquitin ligase activity of MDM2 and preferentially occurs in the cytoplasm. Interestingly, treatment with inhibitors of the PKC (Protein Kinase C) pathway and use of p14ARF phosphorylation mutants indicate that ARF phosphorylation could play a role in MDM2 mediated ARF degradation reinforcing our previous observations that ARF phosphorylation influences its stability and biological activity. Our study uncovers a new potentially important mechanism through which ARF and MDM2 can counterbalance each other during the tumorigenic process.     

Amino terminal hydrophobic import signals target the p14ARF tumor suppressor to the mitochondria

The p14ARF tumour suppressor is frequently targeted for inactivation in many human cancers and in individuals predisposed to cutaneous melanoma. The functions of p14ARF are closely linked with its subcellular distribution. Nucleolar p14ARF dampens ribosome biosynthesis and nucleoplasmic forms of p14ARF activate the p53 pathway and induce cell cycle arrest. p14ARF can also be recruited to mitochondria where it interacts with many mitochondrial proteins, including Bcl-xL and p32 to induce cell death. It has been suggested that the movement of p14ARF to mitochondria requires its interaction with p32, but we now show that the ARF-p32 interaction is not necessary for the accumulation of p14ARF in mitochondria. Instead, highly hydrophobic domains within the amino-terminal half of p14ARF act as mitochondrial import sequences. We suggest that once this hydrophobic pocket is exposed, possibly in a stimulus-dependent manner, it accelerates the mitochondrial import of p14ARF. This allows the interaction of p14ARF with mitochondrial proteins, including p32 and enables p53-independent cell death.     

p16INK4a and p14ARF methylation as a potential biomarker for human bladder cancer

Promoter hypermethylation is one of the putative mechanisms underlying the inactivation of negative cell-cycle regulators. We examined whether the methylation status of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF), genes located upstream of the RB and p53 pathway, is a useful biomarker for the staging, clinical outcome, and prognosis of human bladder cancer. Using methylation-specific PCR (MSP), we examined the methylation status of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) in 64 samples from 45 bladder cancer patients (34 males, 11 females). In 19 patients with recurrent bladder cancer, we examined paired tissue samples from their primary and recurrent tumors. The methylation status of representative samples was confirmed by bisulfite DNA sequencing analysis. The median follow-up duration was 34.3 months (range 27.0-100.1 months). The methylation rate for p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) was 17.8% and 31.1%, respectively, in the 45 patients. The incidence of p16(INKa) and p14(ARF) methylation was significantly higher in patients with invasive (>or=pT2) than superficial bladder cancer (pT1) (p=0.006 and p=0.001, respectively). No MSP bands for p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) were detected in the 8 patients with superficial, non-recurrent tumors. In 19 patients with tumor recurrence, the p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) methylation status of the primary and recurrent tumors was similar. Of the 22 patients who had undergone cystectomy, 8 (36.4%) manifested p16(INKa) methylation; p16(INK4a) was not methylated in 23 patients without cystectomy (p=0.002). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with p14(ARF) methylation had a significantly poorer prognosis than those without (p=0.029). This is the first study indicating that MSP analysis of p16(INK4a) and p14(ARF) genes is a useful biomarker for the pathological stage, clinical outcome, and prognosis of patients with bladder cancer.     

Prevalence of aberrant methylation of p14ARF over p16INK4a in some human primary tumors

The INK4a/ARF locus encodes two unrelated tumor suppressor proteins, p16INK4a and p14ARF, which participate in the two main cell-cycle control pathways, p16–Rb and p14–p53. Methylation of CpG promoter islands has been described as a mechanism of gene silencing. Exon 1 of the p16INK4a gene and the p14ARF promoter gene reside within CpG islands. Therefore, both can become methylated de novo and silenced. It has recently been proposed that the methylation changes in certain genes could be used as molecular markers for the detection of almost all forms of human cancer. Here, we analyzed concomitantly in each tumor sample and normal tissue the methylation status of p16INK4a and p14ARF by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in 100 breast, 95 colon and 27 bladder carcinomas. A series of clinicopathological parameter were obtained from the medical records of the patients, p14ARF showed a higher rate of hypermethylation than p16INK4a in all three tumor types. p16INK4a and p14ARF aberrant methylation was significantly correlated with poor prognosis clinicopathological parameters of the three tumor types. We conclude that both p16INKa and p14ARF hypermethylation may be involved in breast, colon and bladder carcinogenesis, with special emphasis on the role of the lesser studied p14ARF gene, and that tumors with aberrant methylation in the two genes were associated with worse prognosis.     

p14ARF inhibits the growth of p53 deficient cells in a cell-specific manner

While p14(ARF) suppression of tumorigenesis in a p53-dependent manner is well studied, the mechanism by which p14(ARF) inhibits tumorigenesis independently of p53 remains elusive. A variety of factors have been reported to play a role in this latter process. We report here that p14(ARF) displays different effects on the anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of p53-null/Mdm2 wild type cells. p14(ARF) blocks both the anchorage-dependent and-independent (soft agar) proliferation of 293T and p53(-/-) HCT116, but not p53-null H1299 lung carcinoma cells. While p14(ARF) had no effect on the anchorage-dependent proliferation of p53(-/-) MEFs and Ras12V-transformed p53(-/-) MEFs, it inhibited the growth of Ras12V-transformed p53(-/-) MEFs in soft agar. Furthermore, ectopic expression of p14(ARF) did not lead to degradation of the E2F1 protein and did not result in the reduction of E2F1 activity detected by two E2F1 responsible promoters, Apaf1 and p14(ARF) promoter, in 293T, p53(-/-) HCT116, and H1299 cells. This is consistent with our observations that p14(ARF) did not result in G1 arrest, but induced apoptosis via Bax up-regulation. Taken together, our data demonstrate that the response of p53-null cells to ARF is cell type dependent and involves factors other than Mdm2 and E2F1.