Tyrosine sulfation influences the chemokine binding selectivity of peptides derived from chemokine receptor CCR3

The interactions of chemokines with their G protein-coupled receptors play critical roles in the control of leukocyte trafficking in normal homeostasis and in inflammatory responses. Tyrosine sulfation is a common post-translational modification in the amino-terminal regions of chemokine receptors. However, tyrosine sulfation of chemokine receptors is commonly incomplete or heterogeneous. To investigate the possibility that differential sulfation of two adjacent tyrosine residues could bias the responses of chemokine receptor CCR3 to different chemokines, we have studied the binding of three chemokines (eotaxin-1/CCL11, eotaxin-2/CCL24, and eotaxin-3/CCL26) to an N-terminal CCR3-derived peptide in each of its four possible sulfation states. Whereas the nonsulfated peptide binds to the three chemokines with approximately equal affinity, sulfation of Tyr-16 gives rise to 9-16-fold selectivity for eotaxin-1 over the other two chemokines. Subsequent sulfation of Tyr-17 contributes additively to the affinity for eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-2 but cooperatively to the affinity for eotaxin-3. The doubly sulfated peptide selectively binds to both eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-3 approximately 10-fold more tightly than to eotaxin-2. Nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift mapping indicates that these variations in affinity probably result from only subtle differences in the chemokine surfaces interacting with these receptor peptides. These data support the proposal that variations in sulfation states or levels may regulate the responsiveness of chemokine receptors to their cognate chemokines.     

Expression of the chemokine eotaxin and its receptor, CCR3, in human endometrium

Eosinophils are present in human endometrium only immediately before and during menstruation, suggesting a role in that process. The expression of the eosinophil chemoattractant, eotaxin, and its receptor, CCR3, within the human endometrium were investigated by immunohistochemical analysis of tissue sections spanning the entire menstrual cycle. Eotaxin was localized to perivascular cells in the late secretory phase, and it was also identified in eosinophils. However, the highest levels of this chemokine were present in both luminal and glandular epithelial cells during the proliferative and secretory phases of the cycle. Treatment of endometrial tissue with monensin, which blocks protein secretion, increased epithelial immunoreactive eotaxin, substantiating synthesis in these cells. Although the CCR3 receptor was expressed by eosinophils, it was also strongly expressed by endometrial epithelial cells. The CCR3 receptor on purified, cultured endometrial epithelial cells was functional, as assessed by a transient Ca(2+) flux in response to eotaxin. These analyses demonstrate that eotaxin is expressed by endometrial cells and may therefore be involved in the recruitment of eosinophils into this tissue premenstrually. However, the observation that this chemokine and the CCR3 molecule are strongly expressed by epithelial cells throughout the cycle suggests that these proteins may have additional important functions within the endometrium.     

Expression of a functional eotaxin (CC chemokine ligand 11) receptor CCR3 by human dendritic cells

Critical to the function of Ag-presenting dendritic cells (DCs) is their capacity to migrate to lymphoid organs and to sites of inflammation. A final stage of development, termed maturation, yields DCs that are strong stimulators of T cell-mediated immunity and is associated with a remodeling of the cell surface that includes a change in the levels of expression of many molecules, including chemokine receptors. We show in this study that CCR3, a chemokine receptor initially discovered on eosinophils, is also expressed by human DCs that differentiate from blood monocytes, DCs that emigrate from skin (epidermal and dermal DCs), and DCs derived from CD34+ hemopoietic precursors in bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and cytokine-elicited peripheral blood leukapheresis. Unlike other chemokine receptors, such as CCR5 and CCR7, the expression of CCR3 is not dependent on the state of maturation. All DC subsets contain a large intracellular pool of CCR3. The surface expression of CCR3 is not modulated following uptake of particulate substances such as zymosan or latex beads. CCR3 mediates in vitro chemotactic responses to the known ligands, eotaxin and eotaxin-2, because the DC response to these chemokines is inhibited by CCR3-specific mAbs. We postulate that expression of CCR3 may underlie situations where both DCs and eosinophils accumulate in vivo, such as the lesions of patients with Langerhans cell granulomatosis.     

Two C-terminal peptides of human CKLF1 interact with the chemokine receptor CCR4

Human chemokine-like factor 1 (CKLF1) exhibits chemotactic effects on leukocytes. A previous study demonstrated that CKLF1 is a functional ligand for human CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4). In this study, N-terminal amino acid sequencing of secreted CKLF1 protein showed that it contains at least two peptides, C27 and C19. To examine whether C27 or C19 play a role via CCR4, C27 and C19 were chemically synthesized and analyzed by chemotaxis, calcium mobilization, and receptor internalization assays in CCR4-tranfected HEK293 cells or Hut78 cells. The chemotaxis assay showed that C27 could induce chemotaxis to CCR4-transfected HEK293 cells or Hut78 cells while C19 had weaker chemotactic activity, especially in Hut78 cells. C27- or C19-induced chemotaxis was abolished by pertussis toxin, suggesting the involvement of a Gi/o pathway. C27- or C19-induced chemotaxis was also inhibited by an antagonist of CCR4 that show good binding potency, excellent chemotaxis inhibitory activity and selectivity toward CCR4, suggesting that their chemotactic activity specifically involved CCR4. The chemotactic response of CCR4-tranfected HEK293 cells to C27 or C19 was markedly inhibited by preincubation with TARC/CCL17. TARC/CCL17 effectively desensitized the calcium mobilization induced by C27 or C19. Similarly, both of C27 or C19 also desensitized the calcium mobilization and chemotaxis of CCR4-tranfected HEK293 cells in response to TARC/CCL17, suggesting that they might interact with a common receptor. Both C27- and C19-induced clear internalization of CCR4-EGFP. These results confirm that the secreted peptides of CKLF1, C27 and C19, have functional activation via CCR4.     

Identification of receptor binding and activation determinants in the N-terminal and N-loop regions of the CC chemokine eotaxin

Eotaxin is a CC chemokine that specifically activates the receptor CCR3 causing accumulation of eosinophils in allergic diseases and parasitic infections. Twelve amino acid residues in the N-terminal (residues 1-8) and N-loop (residues 11-20) regions of eotaxin have been individually mutated to alanine, and the ability of the mutants to bind and activate CCR3 has been determined in cell-based assays. The alanine mutants at positions Thr(7), Asn(12), Leu(13), and Leu(20) show near wild type binding affinity and activity. The mutants T8A, N15A, and K17A have near wild type binding affinity for CCR3 but reduced receptor activation. A third class of mutants, S4A, V5A, R16A, and I18A, display significantly perturbed binding affinity for CCR3 while retaining the ability to activate or partially activate the receptor. Finally, the mutant Phe(11) has little detectable activity and 20-fold reduced binding affinity relative to wild type eotaxin, the most dramatic effect observed in both assays but less dramatic than the effect of mutating the corresponding residue in some other chemokines. Taken together, the results indicate that residues contributing to receptor binding affinity and those required for triggering receptor activation are distributed throughout the N-terminal and N-loop regions. This conclusion is in contrast to the separation of binding and activation functions between N-loop and N-terminal regions, respectively, that has been observed previously for some other chemokines.     

Synthesis and receptor binding of IgG1 peptides derived from the IgG Fc region

The IgG binding Fcgamma receptors (FcgammaRs) play a key role in defence against pathogens by linking humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Impaired expression and/or function of FcgammaR may result in the development of pathological autoimmunity. Considering the functions of FcgammaRs, they are potential target molecules for drug design to aim at developing novel anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory therapies. Previous data mostly obtained by X-ray analysis of ligand-receptor complexes indicate the profound role of the CH2 domain in binding to various FcgammaRs. Our aim was to localize linear segments, which are able to bind and also to modulate the function of the low affinity FcgammaRs, like FcgammaRIIb and FcgammaRIIIa. To this end a set of overlapping octapeptides was prepared corresponding to the 231-298 sequence of IgG1 CH2 domain and tested for binding to human recombinant soluble FcgammaRIIb. Based on these results, a second group of peptides was synthesized and their binding properties to recombinant soluble FcgammaRIIb, as well as to FcgammaRs expressed on the cell surface, was investigated. Here we report that peptide representing the Arg(255)-Ser(267) sequence of IgG1 is implicated in the binding to FcgammaRIIb. In addition we found that peptides corresponding to the Arg(255)-Ser(267), Lys(288)-Ser(298) or Pro(230)-Val(240) when presented in a multimeric form conjugated to branched chain polypeptide in uniformly oriented copies induced the release of TNFalpha, a pro-inflammatory cytokine from MonoMac monocyte cell line. These findings indicate that these conjugated peptides are able to cluster the activating FcgammaRs, and mediate FcgammaR dependent function. Peptide Arg(255)-Ser(267) can also be considered as a lead for further functional studies.     

Structure modeling of the chemokine receptor CCR5: implications for ligand binding and selectivity

The G-protein coupled receptor CCR5 is the main co-receptor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains. I have built a structural model of the chemokine receptor CCR5 and used it to explain the binding and selectivity of the antagonist TAK779. Models of the extracellular (EC) domains of CCR5 have been constructed and used to rationalize current biological data on the binding of HIV-1 and chemokines. Residues spanning the transmembrane region of CCR5 have been modeled after rhodopsin, and their functional significance examined using the evolutionary trace method. The receptor cavity shares six residues with CC-chemokine receptors CCR1 through CCR4, while seven residues are unique to CCR5. The contribution of these residues to ligand binding and selectivity is tested by molecular docking simulations of TAK779 to CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5. TAK779 binds to CCR5 in the cavity formed by helices 1, 2, 3, and 7 with additional interactions with helices 5 and 6. TAK779 did not dock to either CCR1 or CCR2. The results are consistent with current site-directed mutagenesis data and with the observed selectivity of TAK779 for CCR5 over CCR1 and CCR2. The specific residues responsible for the observed selectivity are identified. The four EC regions of CCR5 have been modeled using constrained simulated annealing simulations. Applied dihedral angle constraints are representative of the secondary structure propensities of these regions. Tertiary interactions, in the form of distance constraints, are generated from available epitope mapping data. Analysis of the 250 simulated structures provides new insights to the design of experiments aimed at determining residue-residue contacts across the EC domains and for mapping CC-chemokines on the surface of the EC domains.     

Identification of chemokine receptor CCR4 antagonist

The present study reports the identification and hits to leads optimization of chemokine receptor CCR4 antagonists. Compound 12 is a high affinity, non-cytotoxic antagonist of CCR4 that blocks the functional activity mediated by the receptor.     

Gene conversion between mammalian CCR2 and CCR5 chemokine receptor genes: a potential mechanism for receptor dimerization

The chemokine receptor genes of the CCR cluster on human chromosome 3p21 play important roles in humoral and cellular immune responses. Several of these receptors have been shown to influence human immunodeficiency virus infection and progression to AIDS, and their homologues may play a role in feline immunodeficiency virus infection. We report the isolation and sequencing of a 150-kb domestic cat BAC clone containing the feline CCR genes CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, and CCR5 to further analyze these four receptor genes within the family Felidae. Comparative and phylogenetic analyses reveal evidence for historic gene conversion between the adjacent CCR2 and CCR5 genes in the Felidae and in three independent mammalian orders (Primates, Cetartiodactyla, and Rodentia), resulting in higher than expected levels of sequence similarity between the two paralogous genes within each order. The gene conversion was restricted to the structural (transmembrane) domains of the CCR2 and CCR5 genes. We also discovered a recent gene conversion event between the third extracellular loop of CCR2 and CCR5 genes that was fixed in Asian lions and found at low frequency in African lions (Panthera leo), suggesting that this domain may have an important functional role. Our results suggest that ongoing parallel gene conversion between CCR2 and CCR5 promotes receptor heterodimerization in independent evolutionary lineages and offers an effective adaptive strategy for gene editing and coevolution among interactive immune response genes in mammals.     

Expression of the C-C chemokine receptor CCR3 in human airway epithelial cells

Chemokine-induced eosinophil chemotaxis is mediated primarily through the C-C chemokine receptor, CCR3. We have now detected CCR3 immunoreactivity on epithelial cells in biopsies of patients with asthma and other respiratory diseases. CCR3 mRNA was detected by Northern blot analysis after TNF-alpha stimulation of the human primary bronchial epithelial cells as well as the epithelial cell line, BEAS-2B; IFN-gamma potentiated the TNF-alpha-induced expression. Western blots and flow cytometry confirmed the expression of CCR3 protein. This receptor is functional based on studies demonstrating eotaxin-induced intracellular Ca(2+) flux and tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins. The specificity of this functional response was confirmed by blocking these signaling events with anti-CCR3 mAb (7B11) or pertussis toxin. Furthermore, (125)I-eotaxin binding assay confirmed that CCR3 expressed on epithelial cells have the expected ligand specificity. These studies indicate that airway epithelial cells express CCR3 and suggest that CCR3 ligands may influence epithelial cell functions.     

Identification of the binding site for a novel class of CCR2b chemokine receptor antagonists: binding to a common chemokine receptor motif within the helical bundle

Monocyte chemoattracant-1 (MCP-1) stimulates leukocyte chemotaxis to inflammatory sites, such as rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, and asthma, by use of the MCP-1 receptor, CCR2, a member of the G-protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor superfamily. These studies identified a family of antagonists, spiropiperidines. One of the more potent compounds blocks MCP-1 binding to CCR2 with a K(d) of 60 nm, but it is unable to block binding to CXCR1, CCR1, or CCR3. These compounds were effective inhibitors of chemotaxis toward MCP-1 but were very poor inhibitors of CCR1-mediated chemotaxis. The compounds are effective blockers of MCP-1-driven inhibition of adenylate cyclase and MCP-1- and MCP-3-driven cytosolic calcium influx; the compounds are not agonists for these pathways. We showed that glutamate 291 (Glu(291)) of CCR2 is a critical residue for high affinity binding and that this residue contributes little to MCP-1 binding to CCR2. The basic nitrogen present in the spiropiperidine compounds may be the interaction partner for Glu(291), because the basicity of this nitrogen was essential for affinity; furthermore, a different class of antagonists, a class that does not have a basic nitrogen (2-carboxypyrroles), were not affected by mutations of Glu(291). In addition to the CCR2 receptor, spiropiperidine compounds have affinity for several biogenic amine receptors. Receptor models indicate that the acidic residue, Glu(291), from transmembrane-7 of CCR2 is in a position similar to the acidic residue contributed from transmembrane-3 of biogenic amine receptors, which may account for the shared affinity of spiropiperidines for these two receptor classes. The models suggest that the acid-base pair, Glu(291) to piperidine nitrogen, anchors the spiropiperidine compound within the transmembrane ovoid bundle. This binding site may overlap with the space required by MCP-1 during binding and signaling; thus the small molecule ligands act as antagonists. An acidic residue in transmembrane region 7 is found in most chemokine receptors and is rare in other serpentine receptors. The model of the binding site may suggest ways to make new small molecule chemokine receptor antagonists, and it may rationalize the design of more potent and selective antagonists.     

pH-independent endocytic cycling of the chemokine receptor CCR5

Following agonist activation, the chemokine receptor CCR5 is internalised through clathrin-coated pits and delivered to recycling endosomes. Subsequently, ligand- free and resensitised receptors are recycled to the cell surface. Currently little is known of the mechanisms regulating resensitisation and recycling of this G-protein coupled receptor. Here we show that raising the pH of endocytic compartments, using bafilomycin A, monensin or NH(4)Cl, does not significantly affect CCR5 endocytosis, recycling or dephosphorylation. By contrast, these reagents inhibited recycling of another well-characterised G protein coupled receptor, the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, following agonist-induced internalisation. CCR5-bound RANTES (CCL5) and MIP-1beta (CCL4) only exhibit pH-dependent dissociation at pH < 4.0, below the values normally found in endocytic organelles. Although receptor-agonist dissociation is not dependent on low pH, the subsequent degradation of released chemokine is inhibited in the presence of reagents that raise endosomal pH. Our data show that exposure to low pH is not required for RANTES or MIP-1beta dissociation from CCR5, or for recycling of internalised CCR5 to the cell surface.     

Cell-type-dependent induction of eotaxin and CCR3 by ionizing radiation

Eotaxin is an eosinophil-specific C-C chemokine that is implicated in the pathogenesis of eosinophilic inflammatory diseases, such as asthma and atopic dermatitis, by acting specifically on its receptor CCR3. Using RT-PCR analysis, we show that the expression of eotaxin is upregulated upon treatment with ionizing radiation (IR) in human dermal fibroblasts, but not in the bronchial epithelial cell line A549. In contrast, the gene encoding CCR3 is markedly induced in both cell types. None of the genes coding for other CCR3 ligands are significantly induced by IR in these cell types. cDNA array analysis of irradiated versus nonirradiated A549 cells and human dermal fibroblasts confirm and extend these results, and support the observation that regulation of eotaxin/CCR3-induction by IR occurs in a selective and cell-type-dependent manner. They further suggest that the induction of signaling via eotaxin and CCR3 may be an important step leading to eosinophilia in patients with radiation exposure.     

Allosteric model of maraviroc binding to CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5)

Maraviroc is a nonpeptidic small molecule human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) entry inhibitor that has just entered the therapeutic arsenal for the treatment of patients. We recently demonstrated that maraviroc binding to the HIV-1 coreceptor, CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), prevents it from binding the chemokine CCL3 and the viral envelope glycoprotein gp120 by an allosteric mechanism. However, incomplete knowledge of ligand-binding sites and the lack of CCR5 crystal structures have hampered an in-depth molecular understanding of how the inhibitor works. Here, we addressed these issues by combining site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) with homology modeling and docking. Six crystal structures of G-protein-coupled receptors were compared for their suitability for CCR5 modeling. All CCR5 models had equally good geometry, but that built from the recently reported dimeric structure of the other HIV-1 coreceptor CXCR4 bound to the peptide CVX15 (Protein Data Bank code 3OE0) best agreed with the SDM data and discriminated CCR5 from non-CCR5 binders in a virtual screening approach. SDM and automated docking predicted that maraviroc inserts deeply in CCR5 transmembrane cavity where it can occupy three different binding sites, whereas CCL3 and gp120 lie on distinct yet overlapped regions of the CCR5 extracellular loop 2. Data suggesting that the transmembrane cavity remains accessible for maraviroc in CCL3-bound and gp120-bound CCR5 help explain our previous observation that the inhibitor enhances dissociation of preformed ligand-CCR5 complexes. Finally, we identified residues in the predicted CCR5 dimer interface that are mandatory for gp120 binding, suggesting that receptor dimerization might represent a target for new CCR5 entry inhibitors.     

Rescue of HIV-1 receptor function through cooperation between different forms of the CCR5 chemokine receptor

Interaction of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope glycoproteins with the CCR5 chemokine receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor, triggers a membrane fusion process and virus entry. Cooperation for HIV-1 receptor activity was observed when two forms of CCR5 were coexpressed, either the wild-type (WT) receptor and a defective mutant with deletion of the amino-terminal (NT) extracellular domain or the latter deltaNT mutant and a human-mouse CCR5 chimera bearing the NT domain from human CCR5. Cooperation was most efficient when the two forms of CCR5 were in a 1:1 ratio. It was not observed between the CCR5 deltaNT mutant and a chimeric receptor (5444) in which the NT domain of CCR5 was in the context of another G-protein-coupled receptor, the HIV-1 receptor CXCR4. These results suggested that physical association between two forms of CCR5 was required for their cooperation. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments in transfected cell lysates indeed showed that the deltaNT CCR5 mutant formed oligomeric complexes with the WT CCR5 or the HMMM chimera but not with the CXCR4-derived chimera 5444. These observations suggest that the formation of CCR5 oligomers is a constitutive process independent from activation by chemokine ligands. The interaction of HIV-1 with independent subunits of CCR5 oligomers could favor the local recruitment of fusiogenic proteins and the formation of a fusion pore.     

Characterization of sequence determinants within the carboxyl-terminal domain of chemokine receptor CCR5 that regulate signaling and receptor internalization.

The CC chemokine receptor CCR5 mediates chemotaxis of leukocytes and serves as a principal co-receptor for macrophage-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1. To identify determinants on the CCR5 carboxyl-terminal domain that regulate receptor signaling and internalization, we generated several CCR5 mutants, which were progressively shortened from the COOH terminus or had carboxyl-terminal serine, cysteine, or leucine residues substituted by alanine and expressed them in RBL-2H3 cells. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer between beta-arrestin and CCR5 tagged with cyan and yellow variants of green fluorescent protein, we show that high affinity association of the two molecules in living cells requires intact carboxyl-terminal serine phosphorylation sites. Phosphorylation-deficient truncation or Ser/Ala replacement mutants of CCR5 mediated a sustained calcium response and enhanced granular enzyme release in RANTES-stimulated cells. Carboxyl-terminal serine residues are critically involved in CCR5 endocytosis and a dileucine motif, similar to that implicated in the regulation of CXCR2 and CXCR4, contributes to the internalization of CCR5 in a phosphorylation-independent manner. Despite their prominent role in receptor desensitization and internalization, beta-arrestins are dispensable for the CCR5-mediated stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in RBL-2H3 cells. We also show that CCR5 is palmitoylated on carboxyl-terminal cysteine residues. Inhibition of CCR5 palmitoylation by alanine mutagenesis of cysteines or treatment with a palmitate analogue inhibitor profoundly reduces phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate- and RANTES-induced receptor phosphorylation, homologous desensitization, and internalization. Alanine mutagenesis of serine, cysteine, or leucine residues or the limited carboxyl-terminal truncation of CCR5 did not impair chemokine-stimulated migration of RBL-2H3 cells. Together these results indicate that post-translational modifications of carboxyl-terminal serine and cysteine residues have a significant impact on receptor deactivation and internalization.     

Predictions of CCR1 chemokine receptor structure and BX 471 antagonist binding followed by experimental validation

A major challenge in the application of structure-based drug design methods to proteins belonging to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the paucity of structural information (1). The 19 chemokine receptors, belonging to the Class A family of GPCRs, are important drug targets not only for autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis but also for the blockade of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 entry (2). Using the MembStruk computational method (3), we predicted the three-dimensional structure of the human CCR1 receptor. In addition, we predicted the binding site of the small molecule CCR1 antagonist BX 471, which is currently in Phase II clinical trials (4). Based on the predicted antagonist binding site we designed 17 point mutants of CCR1 to validate the predictions. Subsequent competitive ligand binding and chemotaxis experiments with these mutants gave an excellent correlation to these predictions. In particular, we find that Tyr-113 and Tyr-114 on transmembrane domain 3 and Ile-259 on transmembrane 6 contribute significantly to the binding of BX 471. Finally, we used the predicted and validated structure of CCR1 in a virtual screening validation of the Maybridge data base, seeded with selective CCR1 antagonists. The screen identified 63% of CCR1 antagonists in the top 5% of the hits. Our results indicate that rational drug design for GPCR targets is a feasible approach.     

Small molecule receptor agonists and antagonists of CCR3 provide insight into mechanisms of chemokine receptor activation

Chemokine receptor CCR3 is highly expressed by eosinophils and signals in response to binding of the eotaxin family of chemokines, which are up-regulated in allergic disorders. Consequently, CCR3 blockade is of interest as a possible therapeutic approach for the treatment of allergic disease. We have described previously a bispecific antagonist of CCR1 and CCR3 named UCB35625 that was proposed to interact with the transmembrane residues Tyr-41, Tyr-113, and Glu-287 of CCR1, all of which are conserved in CCR3. Here, we show that cells expressing the CCR3 constructs Y113A and E287Q are insensitive to antagonism by UCB35625 and also exhibit impaired chemotaxis in response to CCL11/eotaxin, suggesting that these residues are important for antagonist binding and also receptor activation. Furthermore, mutation of the residue Tyr-113 to alanine was found to turn the antagonist UCB35625 into a CCR3 agonist. Screens of small molecule libraries identified a novel specific agonist of CCR3 named CH0076989. This was able to activate eosinophils and transfectants expressing both wild-type CCR3 and a CCR1-CCR3 chimeric receptor lacking the CCR3 amino terminus, indicating that this region of CCR3 is not required for CH0076989 binding. A direct interaction with the transmembrane helices of CCR3 was supported by mutation of the residues Tyr-41, Tyr-113, and Glu-287 that resulted in complete loss of CH0076989 activity, suggesting that the compound mimics activation by CCL11. We conclude that both agonists and antagonists of CCR3 appear to occupy overlapping sites within the transmembrane helical bundle, suggesting a fine line between agonism and antagonism of chemokine receptors.     

Backbone dynamics of the human CC chemokine eotaxin: fast motions, slow motions, and implications for receptor binding.

Eotaxin is a member of the chemokine family of about 40 proteins that induce cell migration. Eotaxin binds the CC chemokine receptor CCR3 that is highly expressed by eosinophils, and it is considered important in the pathology of chronic respiratory disorders such as asthma. The high resolution structure of eotaxin is known. The 74 amino acid protein has two disulfide bridges and shows a typical chemokine fold comprised of a core of three antiparallel beta-strands and an overlying alpha-helix. In this paper, we report the backbone dynamics of eotaxin determined through 15N-T1, T2, and [1H]-15N nuclear Overhauser effect heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments. This is the first extensive study of the dynamics of a chemokine derived from 600, 500, and 300 MHz NMR field strengths. From the T1, T2, and NOE relaxation data, parameters that describe the internal motions of eotaxin were derived using the Lipari-Szabo model free analysis. The most ordered regions of the protein correspond to the known secondary structure elements. However, surrounding the core, the regions known to be functionally important in chemokines show a range of motions on varying timescales. These include extensive subnanosecond to picosecond motions in the N-terminus, C-terminus, and the N-loop succeeding the disulfides. Analysis of rotational diffusion anisotropy of eotaxin and chemical exchange terms at multiple fields also allowed the confident identification of slow conformational exchange through the "30s" loop, disulfides, and adjacent residues. In addition, we show that these motions may be attenuated in the dimeric form of a synthetic eotaxin. The structure and dynamical basis for eotaxin receptor binding is discussed in light of the dynamics data.