Identification of rCop-1, a New Member of the CCN Protein Family,as a Negative Regulator for Cell Transformation

By using a model system for cell transformation mediated by the cooperation of the activated H-ras oncogene and the inactivated p53 tumor suppressor gene, rCop-1 was identified by mRNA differential display as a gene whose expression became lost after cell transformation. Homology analysis indicates that rCop-1 belongs to an emerging cysteine-rich growth regulator family called CCN, which includes connective-tissue growth factor, CYR61, CEF10 (v-src inducible), and the product of the nov proto-oncogene. Unlike the other members of the CCN gene family, rCop-1 is not an immediate-early gene, it lacks the conserved C-terminal domain which was shown to confer both growth-stimulating and heparin-binding activities, and its expression is lost in cells transformed by a variety of mechanisms. Ectopic expression of rCop-1 by retroviral gene transfers led to cell death in a transformation-specific manner. These results suggest that rCop-1 represents a new class of CCN family proteins that have functions opposing those of the previously identified members.Oncogenic conversion of a normal cell into a tumor cell requires multiple genetic alterations (12). Of particular interest is the fact that mutations in both ras oncogenes (3) and the p53 tumor suppressor gene cooperate in transformation of mammalian cells (11). Mutations in both ras and the p53 gene were also found at high frequencies in a variety of human cancers, including those of the colon, lung, and pancreas (2, 18). It has been proposed that both p53 and Ras function, whether directly or through other signaling molecules, to control expression of genes that are important for cell growth and differentiation (13, 17, 37). To this end, several ras target genes (10) and p53 target genes, including those encoding p21/CIP1/WAF1, an inhibitor of G₁ cyclin-dependent kinase (9); Mdm-2, a negative regulator of p53 (1); GADD45, a protein involved in DNA repair (36); and Bax, which promotes apoptosis (28), have been identified. Most of these genes, except p21/CIP1/WAF1, which was cloned by subtractive hybridization, were identified by the candidate gene hypothesis. Recently, more p53 target genes have been isolated by the differential display technique, including those coding for cyclin G (31); MAP4, a microtubule-associated protein negatively regulated by p53 (29); and PAG608, a novel nuclear zinc finger protein whose overexpression promotes apoptosis (14). Functional characterizations of these genes have shed light on the role of p53 in cell cycle control and apoptosis. However, genes that mediate tumor suppression activity by p53 remain elusive.The fact that neither the inactivation of p53 nor the activation of Ras alone is able to transform primary mammalian cells (34), whereas both mutations together can do so, suggests that genes regulated by p53 and Ras cooperate in upsetting normal cell growth control cells (11). Using differential display (22), we set out to identify genes whose expression is altered by both mutant ras and p53 by comparing the mRNA expression profiles of normal rat embryo fibroblasts (REFs) and their derivatives transformed by either a constitutively inactivated or a temperature-sensitive mutant p53 in cooperation with the activated H-ras oncogene (11, 27). In this report we describe the identification and give a functional characterization of rCop-1, a gene whose expression is abolished by cell transformation. By sequence homology, rCop-1 was found to belong to an emerging cysteine-rich growth regulator family called CCN (which stands for connective-tissue growth factor [CTGF], CEF10/Cyr61, and Nov) (4). Here we show that rCop-1 may represent a novel class of CCN family proteins based on its unique cell cycle expression pattern, its lack of the C-terminal (CT) domain conserved in all CCN proteins, its loss of expression in all transformed cells analyzed, and its ability to confer cytotoxicity to the transformed cells.     

Analysis of Host Range Restriction Determinants in the Rabbit Model: Comparison of Homologous and Heterologous Rotavirus Infections

The main limitation of both the rabbit and mouse models of rotavirus infection is that human rotavirus (HRV) strains do not replicate efficiently in either animal. The identification of individual genes necessary for conferring replication competence in a heterologous host is important to an understanding of the host range restriction of rotavirus infections. We recently reported the identification of the P type of the spike protein VP4 of four lapine rotavirus strains as being P[14]. To determine whether VP4 is involved in host range restriction in rabbits, we evaluated infection in rotavirus antibody-free rabbits inoculated orally with two P[14] HRVs, PA169 (G6) and HAL1166 (G8), and with several other HRV strains and animal rotavirus strains of different P and G types. We also evaluated whether the parental rhesus rotavirus (RRV) (P5B[3], G3) and the derived RRV-HRV reassortant candidate vaccine strains RRV × D (G1), RRV × DS-1 (G2), and RRV × ST3 (G4) would productively infect rabbits. Based on virus shedding, limited replication was observed with the P[14] HRV strains and with the SA11 Cl3 (P[2], G3) and SA11 4F (P6[1], G3) animal rotavirus strains, compared to the homologous ALA strain (P[14], G3). However, even limited infection provided complete protection from rotavirus infection when rabbits were challenged orally 28 days postinoculation (DPI) with 10³ 50% infective doses of ALA rabbit rotavirus. Other HRVs did not productively infect rabbits and provided no significant protection from challenge, in spite of occasional seroconversion. Simian RRV replicated as efficiently as lapine ALA rotavirus in rabbits and provided complete protection from ALA challenge. Live attenuated RRV reassortant vaccine strains resulted in no, limited, or productive infection of rabbits, but all rabbits were completely protected from heterotypic ALA challenge. The altered replication efficiency of the reassortants in rabbits suggests a role for VP7 in host range restriction. Also, our results suggest that VP4 may be involved in, but is not exclusively responsible for, host range restriction in the rabbit model. The replication efficiency of rotavirus in rabbits also is not controlled by the product of gene 5 (NSP1) alone, since a reassortant rotavirus with ALA gene 5 and all other genes from SA11 was more severely replication restricted than either parental rotavirus strain.Rotaviruses are the leading cause of acute viral gastroenteritis in humans and animals throughout the world. Rotaviruses belong to the Reoviridae family and are characterized by a genome consisting of 11 segments of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), enclosed in a triple-layered protein capsid (28). Serotype designations are based on independent neutralization determinants on the two outer capsid proteins VP4 (P serotypes, for protease-sensitive protein) and VP7 (G serotypes, for glycoprotein) (28). Serotype specificity determined by cross-neutralization assays using hyperimmune sera against the whole virus is mainly defined by VP7, and 14 G serotypes have been identified (28). Recently, antisera or monoclonal antibodies raised to VP4 and sequence analysis of VP4 identified 12 P serotypes and 20 P genotypes, respectively (28, 39). Rotavirus VP4 protein is responsible for a number of important biological functions, such as the enhancement of infectivity by proteolytic cleavage of VP4 into VP8* and VP5*, hemagglutination, restricted growth in cell culture, virulence, initial virus attachment to cells, and protease sensitivity associated with plaque formation (1, 4, 25, 34, 40, 51).The use of animal models, including the rabbit and mouse models, has been essential to the understanding of rotavirus infection, pathology, disease, immunity, and testing of prospective vaccines in children (21). The limitations of the rabbit and adult mouse models of rotavirus infection for vaccine testing are as follows: (i) human rotavirus (HRV) strains do not efficiently replicate in either animal, (ii) clinical disease is not observed, and (iii) only homologous virus strains (isolated from the same species) replicate efficiently and spread horizontally to uninoculated control animals, whereas heterologous virus strains (isolated from a different species) do not (6, 15, 16, 29, 31, 35, 37, 44, 50, 55). We and others developed a rabbit model of rotavirus infection that is useful for defining basic parameters of active immunity, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of vaccines (12, 15–21, 36, 61). Rabbits are productively infected with homologous lapine rotavirus strains up to at least the age of 5 years, which allows examination of active and long-term immunity for vaccine studies (13, 15–17, 36, 61). Group A lapine rotavirus strains have been isolated in Canada, Japan, Italy, and the United States, and those that have been characterized are serotype G3 (8, 11, 15, 53, 56, 61). Recently, the P type of four different strains was identified as genotype P[14] (11). Previously, limited infection of rabbits with a heterologous strain had been obtained only with SA11 Cl3 (P[2], G3) (15).Attempts to identify host range and virulence determinants for rotavirus have implicated different constellations of genes, including genes 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11 (5, 23, 30, 33, 37, 38, 41, 43, 44, 60, 62, 65). Although host range restriction and virulence may be multigenic, two genes, 4 and 5, are of interest because they cluster according to species of origin, suggesting a role in host range restriction. The finding that genome segment 5 (NSP1) sequences cluster according to species of origin (24, 39, 65) and that, in the mouse model, gene 5 segregates with transmission of virus among littermates (5), led to the hypothesis that NSP1 is involved in host range restriction. VP4 sequence analyses of rotavirus strains isolated from different species revealed that specific VP4 types also generally correlate with the species of origin of each rotavirus strain (43, 60). Therefore, once we identified the P type of four lapine rotaviruses as P[14], we tested two P[14] HRV strains, PA169 (G6) and HAL1166 (G8) (32) to determine if VP4 is involved in host range restriction. We also tested several other HRV strains, live attenuated reassortant candidate vaccine strains [rhesus rotavirus (RRV) × D (G1), RRV × DS-1 (G2), and RRV × ST3 (G4)], and animal rotavirus strains of different P and G types to determine if they could productively infect rabbits. In addition, to evaluate whether the single rotavirus gene 5 is responsible for replication efficiency in rabbits, rabbits were inoculated with a reassortant rotavirus with the lapine ALA gene 5 and all the other genes from the simian rotavirus SA11 Cl3 strain.     

Dbf4-Cdc7 Phosphorylation of Mcm2 Is Required for Cell Growth

The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase (DDK) is required for the activation of the origins of replication, and DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro. We find that budding yeast Cdc7 alone exists in solution as a weakly active multimer. Dbf4 forms a likely heterodimer with Cdc7, and this species phosphorylates Mcm2 with substantially higher specific activity. Dbf4 alone binds tightly to Mcm2, whereas Cdc7 alone binds weakly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to phosphorylate Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2 near the N terminus of the protein, Ser-164 and Ser-170. Expression of mcm2-S170A is lethal to yeast cells that lack endogenous MCM2 (mcm2Δ); however, this lethality is rescued in cells harboring the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth.The Cdc7 protein kinase is required throughout the yeast S phase to activate origins (1, 2). The S phase cyclin-dependent kinase also activates yeast origins of replication (3–5). It has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase, and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6). However, it is not known how Dbf4-Cdc7 (DDK)² acts during S phase to trigger the initiation of DNA replication. DDK has homologs in other eukaryotic species, and the role of Cdc7 in activation of replication origins during S phase may be conserved (7–10).The Mcm2-7 complex functions with Cdc45 and GINS to unwind DNA at a replication fork (11–15). A mutation of MCM5 (mcm5-bob1) bypasses the cellular requirements for DBF4 and CDC7 (16), suggesting a critical physiologic interaction between Dbf4-Cdc7 and Mcm proteins. DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro with proteins purified from budding yeast (17, 18) or human cells (19). Furthermore, there are mutants of MCM2 that show synthetic lethality with DBF4 mutants (6, 17), suggesting a biologically relevant interaction between DBF4 and MCM2. Nevertheless, the physiologic role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is a matter of dispute. In human cells, replacement of MCM2 DDK-phosphoacceptor residues with alanines inhibits DNA replication, suggesting that Dbf4-Cdc7 phosphorylation of Mcm2 in humans is important for DNA replication (20). In contrast, mutation of putative DDK phosphorylation sites at the N terminus of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm2 results in viable cells, suggesting that phosphorylation of S. pombe Mcm2 by DDK is not critical for cell growth (10).In budding yeast, Cdc7 is present at high levels in G₁ and S phase, whereas Dbf4 levels peak in S phase (18, 21, 22). Furthermore, budding yeast DDK binds to chromatin during S phase (6), and it has been shown that Dbf4 is required for Cdc7 binding to chromatin in budding yeast (23, 24), fission yeast (25), and Xenopus (9). Human and fission yeast Cdc7 are inert on their own (7, 8), but Dbf4-Cdc7 is active in phosphorylating Mcm proteins in budding yeast (6, 26), fission yeast (7), and human (8, 10). Based on these data, it has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6, 9, 18, 21–24). However, a mechanistic analysis of how Dbf4 activates Cdc7 has not yet been accomplished. For example, the multimeric state of the active Dbf4-Cdc7 complex is currently disputed. A heterodimer of fission yeast Cdc7 (Hsk1) in complex with fission yeast Dbf4 (Dfp1) can phosphorylate Mcm2 (7). However, in budding yeast, oligomers of Cdc7 exist in the cell (27), and Dbf4-Cdc7 exists as oligomers of 180 and 300 kDa (27).DDK phosphorylates the N termini of human Mcm2 (19, 20, 28), human Mcm4 (10), budding yeast Mcm4 (26), and fission yeast Mcm6 (10). Although the sequences of the Mcm N termini are poorly conserved, the DDK sites identified in each study have neighboring acidic residues. The residues of budding yeast Mcm2 that are phosphorylated by DDK have not yet been identified.In this study, we find that budding yeast Cdc7 is weakly active as a multimer in phosphorylating Mcm2. However, a low molecular weight form of Dbf4-Cdc7, likely a heterodimer, has a higher specific activity for phosphorylation of Mcm2. Dbf4 or DDK, but not Cdc7, binds tightly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2, Ser-164 and Ser-170, in an acidic region of the protein. Mutation of Ser-170 is lethal to yeast cells, but this phenotype is rescued by the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Ser-170 of Mcm2 is required for budding yeast growth.     

Characterization of Interactions between the Mammalian Polycomb-Group Proteins Enx1/EZH2 and EED Suggests the Existence of Different Mammalian Polycomb-Group Protein Complexes

In Drosophila melanogaster, the Polycomb-group (PcG) and trithorax-group (trxG) genes have been identified as repressors and activators, respectively, of gene expression. Both groups of genes are required for the stable transmission of gene expression patterns to progeny cells throughout development. Several lines of evidence suggest a functional interaction between the PcG and trxG proteins. For example, genetic evidence indicates that the enhancer of zeste [E(z)] gene can be considered both a PcG and a trxG gene. To better understand the molecular interactions in which the E(z) protein is involved, we performed a two-hybrid screen with Enx1/EZH2, a mammalian homolog of E(z), as the target. We report the identification of the human EED protein, which interacts with Enx1/EZH2. EED is the human homolog of eed, a murine PcG gene which has extensive homology with the Drosophila PcG gene extra sex combs (esc). Enx1/EZH2 and EED coimmunoprecipitate, indicating that they also interact in vivo. However, Enx1/EZH2 and EED do not coimmunoprecipitate with other human PcG proteins, such as HPC2 and BMI1. Furthermore, unlike HPC2 and BMI1, which colocalize in nuclear domains of U-2 OS osteosarcoma cells, Enx1/EZH2 and EED do not colocalize with HPC2 or BMI1. Our findings indicate that Enx1/EZH2 and EED are members of a class of PcG proteins that is distinct from previously described human PcG proteins.In Drosophila melanogaster, the genes of the Polycomb group (PcG) and trithorax group (trxG) are part of a cellular memory system, which is responsible for the stable inheritance of gene activity. The PcG and trxG genes have been identified in Drosophila as repressors (PcG) (18, 22, 27, 28, 38) and activators (trxG) (20, 21), respectively, of homeotic gene activity. PcG and trxG genes were originally found in Drosophila, but mammalian homologs have also been identified and appear to function like their Drosophila homologs (reviewed in reference 37). It has been proposed that PcG proteins repress gene expression through the formation of multimeric protein complexes. We have recently shown that the human PcG proteins HPH1 and HPH2 coimmunoprecipitate, cofractionate, and colocalize in nuclear domains with the human PcG proteins BMI1 (2, 12, 33) and HPC2, a recently identified, novel human Polycomb protein (33, 34). Furthermore, we have found that the human RING1 protein coimmunoprecipitates and colocalizes with HPC2 and other PcG proteins, indicating that RING1 is associated with, or is part of, the mammalian PcG complex (33, 35). These results indicate that mammalian PcG proteins form a multimeric protein complex. This observation is in agreement with observations that different PcG proteins, including Pc, bind in overlapping patterns on polytene chromosomes in Drosophila salivary gland cells (4, 10, 29).Interestingly, also the trithorax gene product trx colocalizes with Drosophila PcG proteins at many sites on polytene chromosomes (6, 24). Even more strikingly, binding of the trx protein has been mapped to small DNA fragments that also contain binding sites for PcG proteins, the Polycomb response elements (5, 6). This finding is further substantiated by the observation that GAGA factor, the gene product of the trxG gene trithorax-like (Trl) (13), colocalizes with Pc protein within the close vicinity of a Polycomb response element (41). Furthermore, the PcG gene Enhancer of zeste [E(z)] contains a domain with sequence homology with the activator protein trx (17). This observation is in agreement with genetic data which indicate that E(z) can be considered both a PcG gene and a trxG gene (26). Double mutations of E(z) and trxG genes result in homeotic phenotypes which are similar to the homeotic phenotypes which are also observed in double mutants of trxG genes (26). Finally, polytene chromosome binding of the trx protein is strongly reduced in homozygous E(z) mutants (4), and vice versa, polytene chromosome binding of the E(z) protein is reduced in trx mutants (24). These data suggest functional interactions between activators (trxG proteins) and repressors (PcG proteins) that are important for their mode of action.To start to investigate these puzzling features of the E(z) gene product, we used the two-hybrid system (8, 9) in order to identify proteins that interact with a mammalian homolog of E(z), the Enx1/EZH2 protein (15, 16). Here, we report the identification of the human EED protein, which interacts with Enx1/EZH2. EED is the human homolog of eed, a murine PcG gene (7, 36) which has extensive homology with the Drosophila PcG gene extra sex combs (esc) (14, 32, 39). Whereas Enx1/EZH2 and EED coimmunoprecipitate, they neither coimmunoprecipitate nor colocalize with other human PcG proteins, such as HPC2 and BMI1. Our findings indicate that both Enx1/EZH2 and EED form a class of mammalian PcG proteins that is distinct from previously described human PcG proteins.