Study of structure-function relationships in human glutamate dehydrogenases reveals novel molecular mechanisms for the regulation of the nerve tissue-specific (GLUD2) isoenzyme

In mammalian brain, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is located predominantly in astrocytes, where is thought to play a role in transmitter glutamate's metabolism. Human GDH exists in GLUD1 (housekeeping) and GLUD2 (nerve tissue-specific) isoforms, which share all but 15 out of their 505 amino acids. The GLUD1 GDH is potently inhibited by GTP, whereas the GLUD2 enzyme is resistant to this compound. On the other hand, the GLUD2 isoform assumes in the absence of GTP a conformational state associated with little catalytic activity, but it remains amenable to full activation by ADP and/or L-leucine. Site-directed mutagenesis of the GLUD1 gene at sites that differ from the corresponding residues of the GLUD2 gene showed that replacement of Gly456 by Ala made the enzyme resistant to GTP (IC(50)=2.8+/-0.15 microM) compared to the wild-type GDH (IC(50)=0.19+/-0.01 microM). In addition, substitution of Ser for Arg443 virtually abolished basal activity and rendered the enzyme dependent on ADP for its function. These properties may permit the neural enzyme to be recruited under conditions of low energy charge (high ADP:ATP ratio), similar to those that prevail in synaptic astrocytes during intense glutamatergic transmission. Hence, substitution of Ser for Arg443 and Ala for Gly456 are the main evolutionary changes that led to the adaptation of the GLUD2 GDH to the unique metabolic needs of the nerve tissue.     

Single amino acid substitution (G456A) in the vicinity of the GTP binding domain of human housekeeping glutamate dehydrogenase markedly attenuates GTP inhibition and abolishes the cooperative behavior of the enzyme

Human glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) exists in two isoforms encoded by the GLUD1 and GLUD2 genes, respectively. Although the two enzymes share in their mature form all but 15 of their 505 amino acids, they differ markedly in their allosteric regulation. To identify the structural basis for these allosteric characteristics, we performed site-directed mutagenesis on the human GLUD1 gene at sites that differ from the GLUD2 gene using a cloned GLUD1 cDNA. Results showed that substitution of Ala for Gly-456, but not substitution of His for Arg-470 or Ser for Asn-498, renders the enzyme markedly resistant to GTP inhibition (IC(50) = 2.80 microm) as compared with the wild type GLUD1-derived GDH (IC(50) = 0.19 microm). The G456A mutation abolished the cooperative behavior of the enzyme, as revealed by the GTP inhibitory curves. The catalytic and kinetic properties of the G456A mutant and its activation by ADP were comparable with those of the wild type GDH. Gly-456 lies in a very tightly packed region of the GDH molecule, and its replacement by Ala may lead to steric clashes with neighboring amino acids. These, in turn, may affect the conformational state of the protein that is essential for the allosteric regulation of the enzyme by GTP.     

Nerve Tissue-Specific Human Glutamate Dehydrogenase that Is Thermolabile and Highly Regulated by ADP

Abstract: Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), an enzyme that is central to the metabolism of glutamate, is present at high levels in the mammalian brain. Studies on human leukocytes and rat brain suggested the presence of two GDH activities differing in thermal stability and allosteric regulation, but molecular biological investigations led to the cloning of two human GDH-specific genes encoding highly homologous polypeptides. The first gene, designated GLUD1, is expressed in all tissues (housekeeping GDH), whereas the second gene, designated GLUD2, is expressed specifically in neural and testicular tissues. In this study, we obtained both GDH isoenzymes in pure form by expressing a GLUD1 cDNA and a GLUD2 cDNA in Sf9 cells and studied their properties. The enzymes generated showed comparable catalytic properties when fully activated by 1 mM ADP. However, in the absence of ADP, the nerve tissue-specific GDH showed only 5% of its maximal activity, compared with ～40% showed by the housekeeping enzyme. Low physiological levels of ADP (0.05–0.25 mM) induced a concentration-dependent enhancement of enzyme activity that was proportionally greater for the nerve tissue GDH (by 550–1,300%) than of the housekeeping enzyme (by 120–150%). Magnesium chloride (1–2 mM) inhibited the nonactivated housekeeping GDH (by 45–64%); this inhibition was reversed almost completely by ADP. In contrast, Mg²⁺ did not affect the nonstimulated nerve tissue-specific GDH, although the cation prevented much of the allosteric activation of the enzyme at low ADP levels (0.05–0.25 mM). Heat-inactivation experiments revealed that the half-life of the housekeeping and nerve tissue-specific GDH was 3.5 and 0.5 h, respectively. Hence, the nerve tissue-specific GDH is relatively thermolabile and has evolved into a highly regulated enzyme. These allosteric properties may be of importance for regulating brain glutamate fluxes in vivo under changing energy demands.     

Mutations in human GLUD2 glutamate dehydrogenase affecting basal activity and regulation

Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) in human exists in GLUD1 and GLUD2 gene-encoded isoforms (hGDH1 and hGDH2, respectively), differing in their regulation and tissue expression pattern. Whereas hGDH1 is subject to GTP control, hGDH2 uses for its regulation, a novel molecular mechanism not requiring GTP. This is based on the ability of hGDH2 to maintain a baseline activity of <10% of its capacity subject to full activation by rising ADP/ l -leucine levels. Here we studied further the molecular mechanisms regulating hGDH2 function by creating and analyzing hGDH2 mutants harboring single amino acid substitutions in the regulatory domain (antenna, pivot helix) of the protein. Five hGDH2 mutants were obtained: two with an amino acid change (Gln441Arg, Ser445Leu) in the antenna, two (Lys450Glu, His454Tyr) in the pivot helix, and one (Ser448Pro) in the junction between the two structures. Functional analyses revealed that, while the antenna mutations increased basal enzyme activity without affecting its allosteric properties, the pivot helix mutations drastically reduced basal activity and impaired enzyme regulation. On the other hand, the Ser448Pro mutation reduced basal activity but did not alter allosteric regulation. Also, compared with wild-type hGDH2, the antenna mutants were relatively thermostable, whereas the pivot helix mutants were extremely heat labile. Hence, the present data further our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the function and stability of hGDH2, an enzyme thought to be of importance for nerve tissue biology.     

Substitution of Ser for Arg-443 in the regulatory domain of human housekeeping (GLUD1) glutamate dehydrogenase virtually abolishes basal activity and markedly alters the activation of the enzyme by ADP and L-leucine

Human glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) exists in GLUD1 (housekeeping) and in GLUD2-specified (brain-specific) isoforms, which differ markedly in their basal activity and allosteric regulation. To determine the structural basis of these functional differences, we mutagenized the GLUD1 GDH at four residues that differ from those of the GLUD2 isoenzyme. Functional analyses revealed that substitution of Ser for Arg-443 (but not substitution of Thr for Ser-331, Leu for Met-370, or Leu for Met-415) virtually abolished basal activity and totally abrogated the activation of the enzyme by l-leucine (1-10 mm) in the absence of other effectors. However, when ADP (0.025-0.1 mm) was present in the reaction mixture, l-leucine (0.3-6.0 mm) activated the mutant enzyme up to >2,000%. The R443S mutant was much less sensitive to ADP (SC(50) = 383.9 +/- 14.6 microm) than the GLUD1 GDH (SC(50) = 31.7 +/- 4.2 microm; p < 0.001); however, at 1 mm ADP the V(max) for the mutant (136.67 micromol min(-1) mg(-1)) was comparable with that of the GLUD1 GDH (152.95 micromol min(-1) mg(-1)). Varying the composition and the pH of the reaction buffer differentially affected the mutant and the wild-type GDH. Arg-443 lies in the "antenna" structure, in a helix that undergoes major conformational changes during catalysis and is involved in intersubunit communication. Its replacement by Ser is sufficient to impair both the catalytic and the allosteric function of human GDH.     

Heterogeneous Cellular Distribution of Glutamate Dehydrogenase in Brain and in Non-neural Tissues

Mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) is an evolutionarily conserved enzyme central to the metabolism of glutamate, the main excitatory transmitter in mammalian CNS. Its activity is allosterically regulated and thought to be controlled by the need of the cell for ATP. While in most mammals, GDH is encoded by a single GLUD1 gene that is widely expressed (housekeeping; hGDH1 in the human), humans and other primates have acquired via retroposition a GLUD2 gene encoding an hGDH2 isoenzyme with distinct functional properties and tissue expression profile. Whereas hGDH1 shows high levels of expression in the liver, hGDH2 is expressed in human testis, brain and kidney. Recent studies have provided significant insight into the functional adaptation of hGDH2. This includes resistance to GTP control, enhanced sensitivity to inhibition by estrogens and other endogenous allosteric effectors, and ability to function in a relatively acidic environment. While inhibition of hGDH1 by GTP, derived from Krebs cycle, represents the main mechanism by which the flux of glutamate through this pathway is regulated, dissociation of hGDH2 from GTP control may provide a biological advantage by permitting enzyme function independently of this energy switch. Also, the relatively low optimal pH for hGDH2 is suited for transmitter glutamate metabolism, as glutamate uptake by astrocytes leads to significant mitochondrial acidification. Although mammalian GDH is a housekeeping enzyme, its levels of expression vary markedly among the various tissues and among the different types of cells that constitute the same organ. In this paper, we will review existing evidence on the cellular and subcellular distribution of GDH in neural and non-neural tissues of experimental animals and humans, and consider the implications of these findings in biology of these tissues. Special attention is given to accumulating evidence that glutamate flux through the GDH pathway is linked to cell signaling mechanisms that may be tissue-specific.     

The human GLUD2 glutamate dehydrogenase and its regulation in health and disease

Whereas glutamate dehydrogenase in most mammals (hGDH1 in the human) is encoded by a single functional GLUD1 gene expressed widely, humans and other primates have acquired through retroposition an X-linked GLUD2 gene that encodes a highly homologous isoenzyme (hGDH2) expressed in testis and brain. Using an antibody specific for hGDH2, we showed that hGDH2 is expressed in testicular Sertoli cells and in cerebral cortical astrocytes. Although hGDH1 and hGDH2 have similar catalytic properties, they differ markedly in their regulatory profile. While hGDH1 is potently inhibited by GTP and may be controlled by the need of the cell for ATP, hGDH2 has dissociated its function from GTP and may metabolize glutamate even when the Krebs cycle generates GTP amounts sufficient to inactivate hGDH1. As astrocytes are known to provide neurons with lactate that largely derives from the Krebs cycle via conversion of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate, the selective expression of hGDH2 may facilitate metabolic recycling processes essential for glutamatergic transmission. As there is evidence for deregulation of glutamate metabolism in degenerative neurologic disorders, we sequenced GLUD1 and GLUD2 genes in neurologic patients and found that a rare T1492G variation in GLUD2 that results in substitution of Ala for Ser445 in the regulatory domain of hGDH2 interacted significantly with Parkinson's disease (PD) onset. Thus, in two independent Greek and one North American PD cohorts, Ser445Ala hemizygous males, but not heterozygous females, developed PD 6-13 years earlier than subjects with other genotypes. The Ala445-hGDH2 variant shows enhanced catalytic activity that is resistant to modulation by GTP, but sensitive to inhibition by estrogens. These observations are thought to suggest that enhanced glutamate oxidation by the Ala445-hGDH2 variant accelerates nigral cell degeneration in hemizygous males and that inhibition of the overactive enzyme by estrogens protects heterozygous females. We then evaluated the interaction of estrogens and neuroleptic agents (haloperidol and perphenazine) with the wild-type hGDH1 and hGDH2 and found that both inhibited hGDH2 more potently than hGDH1 and that the evolutionary Arg443Ser substitution was largely responsible for this sensitivity. Hence, the properties acquired by hGDH2 during its evolution have made the enzyme a selective target for neuroactive steroids and drugs, providing new means for therapeutic interventions in disorders linked to deregulation of this enzyme.     

The Discovery of Human of GLUD2 Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Its Implications for Cell Function in Health and Disease

While the evolutionary changes that led to traits unique to humans remain unclear, there is increasing evidence that enrichment of the human genome through DNA duplication processes may have contributed to traits such as bipedal locomotion, higher cognitive abilities and language. Among the genes that arose through duplication in primates during the period of increased brain development was GLUD2, which encodes the hGDH2 isoform of glutamate dehydrogenase expressed in neural and other tissues. Glutamate dehydrogenase GDH is an enzyme central to the metabolism of glutamate, the main excitatory neurotransmitter in mammalian brain involved in a multitude of CNS functions, including cognitive processes. In nerve tissue GDH is expressed in astrocytes that wrap excitatory synapses, where it is thought to play a role in the metabolic fate of glutamate removed from the synaptic cleft during excitatory transmission. Expression of GDH rises sharply during postnatal brain development, coinciding with nerve terminal sprouting and synaptogenesis. Compared to the original hGDH1 (encoded by the GLUD1 gene), which is potently inhibited by GTP generated by the Krebs cycle, hGDH2 can function independently of this energy switch. In addition, hGDH2 can operate efficiently in the relatively acidic environment that prevails in astrocytes following glutamate uptake. This adaptation is thought to provide a biological advantage by enabling enhanced enzyme catalysis under intense excitatory neurotransmission. While the novel protein may help astrocytes to handle increased loads of transmitter glutamate, dissociation of hGDH2 from GTP control may render humans vulnerable to deregulation of this enzyme’s function. Here we will retrace the cloning and characterization of the novel GLUD2 gene and the potential implications of this discovery in the understanding of mechanisms that permitted the brain and other organs that express hGDH2 to fine-tune their functions in order to meet new challenging demands. In addition, the potential role of gain-of-function of hGDH2 variants in human neurodegenerative processes will be considered.     

Adenosine 5'-0-[S-(4-succinimidyl-benzophenone)thiophosphate]: a new photoaffinity label of the allosteric ADP site of bovine liver glutamate dehydrogenase

By reaction of adenosine 5'-monothiophosphate with benzophenone-4-maleimide, we synthesized adenosine 5'-O-[S-(4-succinimidyl-benzophenone)thiophosphate] (AMPS-Succ-BP) as a photoreactive ADP analogue. Bovine liver glutamate dehydrogenase is known to be allosterically activated by ADP, but the ADP site has not been located in the crystal structure of the hexameric enzyme [Peterson, P. E., and Smith, T. J. (1999) Structure 7, 769-782]. In the dark, AMPS-Succ-BP reversibly activates GDH. Irradiation of the complex of glutamate dehydrogenase and AMPS-Succ-BP at lambda >300 nm causes a time-dependent, irreversible 2-fold activation of the enzyme. The k(obs) for photoactivation shows nonlinear dependence on the concentration of AMPS-Succ-BP, with K(R) = 4.9 microM and k(max) = 0.076 min(-)(1). The k(obs) for photoreaction by 20 microM AMPS-Succ-BP is decreased 10-fold by 200 microM ADP, but is reduced less than 2-fold by NAD, NADH, GTP, or alpha-ketoglutarate. Modified enzyme is no longer activated by ADP, but is still inhibited by GTP and high concentrations of NADH. These results indicate that reaction of AMPS-Succ-BP occurs within the ADP site. The enzyme incorporates up to 0.5 mol of [(3)H]AMPS-Succ-BP/mol of enzyme subunit or 3 mol of reagent/mol of hexamer. The peptide Lys(488)-Glu(495) has been identified as the only reaction target, and the data suggest that Arg(491) is the modified amino acid. Arg(491) (in the C-terminal helix close to the GTP #2 binding domain of GDH) is thus considered to be at or near the enzyme's allosteric ADP site. On the basis of these results, the AMPS-Succ-BP was positioned within the crystal structure of glutamate dehydrogenase, where it should also mark the ADP binding site of the enzyme.     

Purification and Characterization of a Soluble and a Particulate Glutamate Dehydrogenase from Rat Brain

Glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) activity was determined in high-speed fractions (100,000 g for 60 min) obtained from whole rat brain homogenates after removal of a low-speed pellet (480 g for 10 min). Approximately 60% of the high-speed GDH activity was particulate (associated with membrane) and the remaining was soluble (probably of mitochondrial matrix origin). Most of the particulate GDH activity resisted extraction by several commonly used detergents, high concentration of salt, and sonication; however, it was largely extractable with the cationic detergent cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) in hypotonic buffer solution. The two GDH activities were purified using a combination of hydrophobic interaction, ion exchange, and hydroxyapatite chromatography. Throughout these purification steps the two activities showed similar behavior. Kinetic studies indicated similar Km values for the two GDH fractions for the substrates alpha-ketoglutarate, ammonia, and glutamate; however, there were small but significant differences in Km values for NADH and NADPH. Although the allosteric stimulation by ADP and L-leucine and inhibition by diethylstilbestrol was comparable, the two GDH components differed significantly in their susceptibility to GTP inhibition in the presence of 1 mM ADP, with apparent Ki values of 18.5 and 9.0 microM GTP for the soluble and particulate fractions, respectively. The Hill plot coefficient, binding constant, and cooperativity index for the GTP inhibition were also significantly different, indicating that the two GDH activities differ in their allosteric sites. In addition, enzyme activities of the two purified proteins exhibited a significant difference in thermal stability when inactivated at 45 degrees C and pH 7.4 in 50 mM phosphate buffer.     

Effects of ADP on different inhibitory properties of brain glutamate dehydrogenase isoproteins by perphenazine

Incubation of glutamate dehydrogenase isoproteins (GDH I and GDH II) from bovine brains with perphenazine resulted in a time-dependent loss of enzyme activity. 2-Oxoglutarate and NADH, separately or together, gave partial but not complete protection against the inhibition. Although there were no detectable differences between GDH I and GDH II in inhibition by perphenazine in the absence of ADP, the sensitivities to the inhibition by the drug were significantly distinct for the two isoproteins in the presence of ADP. Low concentrations of ADP (0.05-0.20 mM) did not interfere with the inhibition of GDH I and GDH II by perphenazine. However, in the presence of high concentrations of ADP (0.5-1.0 mM), inhibitory effects of perphenazine on GDH isoproteins were significantly diminished as determined by enzyme kinetics and quantitative affinity chromatography on perphenazine-Sepharose. GDH I was more sensitively reacted with ADP than GDH II on the inhibition by perphenazine. Since physiological ADP levels can vary from 0.05 to > 1.0 mM depending on the rate of oxidative phosphorylation, our results suggest a possibility that two types of GDHs are differently regulated by the antipsychotic actions of perphenazine depending on the physiological concentrations of ADP. GTP and L-leucine, other well-known allosteric regulators, did not affect the inhibitory actions of perphenazine on bovine brain GDH isoproteins.     

Inhibitory properties of nerve-specific human glutamate dehydrogenase isozyme by chloroquine

Human glutamate dehydrogenase exists in hGDH1 (housekeeping isozyme) and in hGDH2 (nerve-specific isozyme), which differ markedly in their allosteric regulation. In the nervous system, GDH is enriched in astrocytes and is important for recycling glutamate, a major excitatory neurotransmitter during neurotransmission. Chloroquine has been known to be a potent inhibitor of house-keeping GDH1 in permeabilized liver and kidney-cortex of rabbit. However, the effects of chloroquine on nerve-specific GDH2 have not been reported yet. In the present study, we have investigated the effects of chloroquine on hGDH2 at various conditions and showed that chloroquine could inhibit the activity of hGDH2 at dose-dependent manner. Studies of the chloroquine inhibition on enzyme activity revealed that hGDH2 was relatively less sensitive to chloroquine inhibition than house-keeping hGDH1. Incubation of hGDH2 was uncompetitive with respect of NADH and non-competitive with respect of 2-oxoglutarate. The inhibitory effect of chloroquine on hGDH2 was abolished, although in part, by the presence of ADP and L-leucine, whereas GTP did not change the sensitivity to chloroquine inhibition. Our results show a possibility that chloroquine may be used in regulating GDH activity and subsequently glutamate concentration in the central nervous system.     

The structure of bovine glutamate dehydrogenase provides insights into the mechanism of allostery.

BACKGROUND: Bovine glutamate dehydrogenase (boGDH) is a homohexameric, mitochondrial enzyme that reversibly catalyzes the oxidative deamination of L-glutamate to 2-oxoglutarate using either NADP(H) or NAD(H) with comparable efficacy. GDH represents a key enzymatic link between catabolic and biosynthetic pathways, and is therefore ubiquitous in both higher and lower organisms. Only mammalian GDH exhibits strong negative cooperativity with respect to the coenzyme, however, and is regulated by a large number of allosteric effectors. RESULTS: The atomic structure of boGDH in complex with NADH, glutamate, and the allosteric inhibitor GTP has been determined to 2.8 A resolution. The major difference between the bacterial and bovine GDH structures is the presence of an additional 'antenna' in boGDH that protrudes from each trimer, twisting counterclockwise along the threefold axis. NADH and glutamate are clearly observed in the active site, but the contacts differ slightly from those observed in Clostridium symbiosum GDH. A second, inhibitory NADH molecule lies buried in the core of the hexamer. Finally, two GTP molecules bind near the hinge region connecting the NAD(+)- and glutamate-binding domains. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that the antenna serves as an intersubunit communication conduit during negative cooperativity and allosteric regulation. GTP and NADH inhibit GDH by keeping the catalytic cleft in a closed conformation. In contrast, ADP probably binds to the back of the NAD(+)-binding domain and activates the enzyme by keeping the catalytic cleft open. Extensive contacts between antennae within the crystal lattice may represent hexamer interactions in solution and, perhaps, with other enzymes within the mitochondrial matrix.     

Alpha helical structures in the leader sequence of human GLUD2 glutamate dehydrogenase responsible for mitochondrial import

Human glutamate dehydrogenase (hGDH) exists in two highly homologous isoforms with a distinct regulatory and tissue expression profile: a housekeeping hGDH1 isoprotein encoded by the GLUD1 gene and an hGDH2 isoenzyme encoded by the GLUD2 gene. There is evidence that both isoenzymes are synthesized as pro-enzymes containing a 53 amino acid long N-terminal leader peptide that is cleaved upon translocation into the mitochondria. However, this GDH signal peptide is substantially larger than that of most nuclear DNA-encoded mitochondrial proteins, the leader sequence of which typically contains 17-35 amino acids and they often form a single amphipathic α-helix. To decode the structural elements that are essential for the mitochondrial targeting of human GDHs, we performed secondary structure analyses of their leader sequence. These analyses predicted, with 82% accuracy, that both leader peptides are positively charged and that they form two to three α-helices, separated by intermediate loops. The first α-helix of hGDH2 is strongly amphipathic, displaying both a positively charged surface and a hydrophobic plane. We then constructed GLUD2-EGFP deletion mutants and used them to transfect three mammalian cell lines (HEK293, COS 7 and SHSY-5Y). Confocal laser scanning microscopy, following co-transfection with pDsRed2-Mito mitochondrial targeting vector, revealed that deletion of the entire leader sequence prevented the enzyme from entering the mitochondria, resulting in its retention in the cytoplasm. Deletion of the first strongly amphipathic α-helix only was also sufficient to prevent the mitochondrial localization of the truncated protein. Moreover, truncated leader sequences, retaining the second and/or the third putative α-helix, failed to restore the mitochondrial import of hGDH2. As such, the first N-terminal alpha helical structure is crucial for the mitochondrial import of hGDH2 and these findings may have implications in understanding the evolutionary mechanisms that led to the large mitochondrial targeting signals of human GDHs.     

The Odyssey of a Young Gene: Structure–Function Studies in Human Glutamate Dehydrogenases Reveal Evolutionary-Acquired Complex Allosteric Regulation Mechanisms

Mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) catalyzes the reversible inter-conversion of glutamate to α-ketoglutarate and ammonia, interconnecting carbon skeleton and nitrogen metabolism. In addition, it functions as an energy switch by its ability to fuel the Krebs cycle depending on the energy status of the cell. As GDH lies at the intersection of several metabolic pathways, its activity is tightly regulated by several allosteric compounds that are metabolic intermediates. In contrast to other mammals that have a single GDH-encoding gene, humans and great apes possess two isoforms of GDH (hGDH1 and hGDH2, encoded by the GLUD1 and GLUD2 genes, respectively) with distinct regulation pattern, but remarkable sequence similarity (they differ, in their mature form, in only 15 of their 505 amino-acids). The GLUD2 gene is considered a very young gene, emerging from the GLUD1 gene through retro-position only recently (<23 million years ago). The new hGDH2 iso-enzyme, through random mutations and natural selection, is thought to have conferred an evolutionary advantage that helped its persistence through primate evolution. The properties of the two highly homologous human GDHs have been studied using purified recombinant hGDH1 and hGDH2 proteins obtained by expression of the corresponding cDNAs in Sf21 cells. According to these studies, in contrast to hGDH1 that maintains basal activity at 35–40 % of its maximal, hGDH2 displays low basal activity that is highly responsive to activation by rising levels of ADP and/or l-leucine which can also act synergistically. While hGDH1 is inhibited potently by GTP, hGDH2 shows remarkable GTP resistance. Furthermore, the two iso-enzymes are differentially inhibited by estrogens, polyamines and neuroleptics, and also differ in heat-lability. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms that underlie these different regulation patterns of the two iso-enzymes (and consequently the evolutionary adaptation of hGDH2 to a new functional role), we have performed mutagenesis at sites of difference in their amino acid sequence. Results showed that the low basal activity, heat-lability and estrogen sensitivity of hGDH2 could be, at least partially, ascribed to the Arg443Ser evolutionary change, whereas resistance to GTP inhibition has been attributed to the Gly456Ala change. Other amino acid substitutions studied thus far cannot explain all the remaining functional differences between the two iso-enzymes. Also, the Arg443Ser/Gly456Ala double mutation in hGDH1 approached the properties of wild-type hGDH2, without being identical to it. The insights into the structural mechanism of enzymatic regulation and the implications in cell biology provided by these findings are discussed.     

Nucleotide allosteric regulation of the glutamate dehydrogenases of Teladorsagia circumcincta and Haemonchus contortus

The expression of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH; EC 1.4.1.3) in L3 of the nematode Haemonchus contortus was confirmed by detecting GDH mRNA, contrary to earlier reports. The enzyme was active in both L3 and adult H. contortus homogenates either with NAD⁺/H or NADP⁺/H as co-factor. Although it was a dual co-factor GDH, activity was greater with NAD⁺/H than with NADP⁺/H. The rate of the aminating reaction (glutamate formation) was approximately three times higher than for the deaminating reaction (glutamate utilisation). GDH provides a pathway for ammonia assimilation, although the affinity for ammonia was low. Allosteric regulation by GTP, ATP and ADP of L3 and adult H. contortus and Teladorsagia circumcincta (Nematoda) GDH depended on the concentration of the regulators and the direction of the reaction. The effects of each nucleotide were qualitatively similar on the mammalian and parasite GDH, although the nematode enzymes were more responsive to activation by ADP and ATP and less inhibited by GTP under optimum assay condition. GTP inhibited deamination and low concentrations of ADP and ATP stimulated weakly. In the reverse direction, GTP was strongly inhibitory and ADP and ATP activated the enzyme.     

The effect of nucleotides on glutamate dehydrogenase from the mealworm fat body

The effect of nucleotides: AMP, cAMP, ADP, ATP, GDP and GTP, on glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) purified from the mealworm fat body was studied. Guanine nucleotides and ATP inhibited the enzyme strongly in both directions. GDH was partially protected from the inhibition by the addition of ADP to an assay medium. AMP and cAMP activated the enzyme slightly. The concerted effects of ADP and ATP indicate the importance of adenylate energy charge in the regulation of fat body GDH. It is suggested that GDH may play amphibolic role in the fat body and that the direction of GDH catalysed reaction is under strong influence of nucleotides. The enzyme may synthesize glutamate at high energy charge, but when the energy reserves are low, it oxidizes glutamate.     

Conformational flexibility of a model protein upon immobilization on self-assembled monolayers

The present study reports on the retention of conformational flexibility of a model allosteric protein upon immobilization on self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on gold. Organothiolated SAMs of different compositions were utilized for adsorptive and covalent attachment of bovine liver glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), a well-characterized allosteric enzyme. Sensitive fluorimetric assays were developed to determine immobilization capacity, specific activity, and allosteric properties of the immobilized preparations as well as the potential for repeated use and continuous catalytic transformations. The allosteric response of the free and immobilized forms towards ADP, L-leucine and high concentrations of NAD(+), some of the well-known activators for this enzyme, were determined and compared. The enzyme immobilized by adsorption or chemical binding responded similarly to the activators with a greater degree of activation, as compared to the free form. Also loss of activity involving the two immobilization procedures were similar, suggesting that residues essential for catalytic activity or allosteric properties of GDH remained unchanged in the course of chemical modification. A recently established method was used to predict GDH orientation upon immobilization, which was found to explain some of the experimental results presented. The general significance of these observations in connection with retention of native properties of protein structures upon immobilization on SAMs is discussed.