Dissection of the GTPase mechanism of Ras protein by MD analysis of Ras mutants

Controlling the hydrolysis rate of GTP bound to the p21ras protein is crucial for the delicate timing of many biological processes. A few mechanisms were suggested for the hydrolysis of GTP. To gain more insight into the individual elementary events of GTP hydrolysis, we carried out molecular dynamic analysis of wild-type p21ras and some of its mutants. It was recently shown that Ras-related proteins and mutants generally follow a linear free energy relationship (LFER) relating the rate of reaction to the pK(a) of the gamma-phosphate group of the bound GTP, indicating that proton transfer from the attacking water to the GTP is the first elementary event in the GTPase mechanism. However, some exceptions were observed. Thus, the Gly12 --> Aspartic p21ras (G12D) mutant had a very low GTPase activity although its pK(a) was very close to that of the wild-type ras. Here we compared the molecular dynamics (MD) of wild-type Ras and G12D, showing that in the mutant the catalytic water molecule is displaced to a position where proton transfer to GTP is unfavorable. These results suggest that the mechanism of GTPase is indeed composed of an initial proton abstraction from water by the GTP, followed by a nucleophilic attack of the hydroxide ion on the gamma-phosphorus of GTP.     

Hydrolysis of GTP by the alpha-chain of Gs and other GTP binding proteins

The functions of G proteins--like those of bacterial elongation factor (EF) Tu and the 21 kDa ras proteins (p21ras)--depend upon their abilities to bind and hydrolyze GTP and to assume different conformations in GTP- and GDP-bound states. Similarities in function and amino acid sequence indicate that EF-Tu, p21ras, and G protein alpha-chains evolved from a primordial GTP-binding protein. Proteins in all three families appear to share common mechanisms for GTP-dependent conformational change and hydrolysis of bound GTP. Biochemical and molecular genetic studies of the alpha-chain of Gs (alpha s) point to key regions that are involved in GTP-dependent conformational change and in hydrolysis of GTP. Tumorigenic mutations of alpha s in human pituitary tumors inhibit the protein's GTPase activity and cause constitutive elevation of adenylyl cyclase activity. One such mutation replaces a Gln residue in alpha s that corresponds to Gln-61 of p21ras; mutational replacements of this residue in both proteins inhibit their GTPase activities. A second class of GTPase inhibiting mutations in alpha s occurs in the codon for an Arg residue whose covalent modification by cholera toxin also inhibits GTP hydrolysis by alpha s. This Arg residue is located in a domain of alpha s not represented in EF-Tu or p21ras. We propose that this domain constitutes an intrinsic activator of GTP hydrolysis, and that it performs a function analogous to that performed for EF-Tu by the programmed ribosome and for p21ras by the recently discovered GTPase-activating protein.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

GTP hydrolysis mechanisms in ras p21 and in the ras-GAP complex studied by fluorescence measurements on tryptophan mutants

We have substituted leucine 56 or tyrosine 64 of p21 ras with a tryptophan. The intrinsic fluorescence of this tryptophan was used as an internal conformational probe for time-resolved biochemical studies of the ras protein. The slow intrinsic GTPase, GDP/GTP exchange induced by the SDC25 "exchange factor", and the fast GTP hydrolysis induced by GAP were studied. Tryptophan fluorescence of mutated ras is very sensitive to magnesium binding, GDP/GTP exchange, and GTP hydrolysis (changes in tyrosine fluorescence of wild-type ras are also observed but with a lower sensitivity). Nucleotide affinities, exchange kinetics, and intrinsic GTPase rates of the mutated ras could be measured by this method and were found to be close to those of wild-type ras. The SDC25 gene product enhances GDP/GTP exchange in both mutants. In both mutants, a slow fluorescence change follows the binding of GTP gamma S; its kinetics are close to those of the intrinsic GTPase, suggesting that a slow conformational change precedes the GTPase and is the rate-limiting step, as proposed by Neal et al. (1990) (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 3562-3565). GAP interacts with both mutant ras proteins and accelerates the GTPase of (L56W)ras but not that of (Y64W)ras, suggesting a role for tyrosine 64 in GAP-induced GTP hydrolysis. However, GAP does not accelerate the slow conformational change following GTP gamma S binding in either of the mutated ras proteins. This suggests that the fast GAP-induced catalysis of GTP hydrolysis that is observed with (L56W)ras bypasses the slow conformational change associated with the intrinsic GTPase and therefore might proceed by a different mechanism.     

Structure of the small G protein Rap2 in a non-catalytic complex with GTP

We report a novel crystal form of the small G protein Rap2A in complex with GTP which has no GTPase activity in the crystal. The asymmetric unit contains two complexes which show that a conserved switch I residue, Tyr 32, contributes an extra hydrogen bond to the gamma-phosphate of GTP as compared to related structures with GTP analogs. Since GTP is not hydrolyzed in the crystal, this interaction is unlikely to contribute to the intrinsic GTPase activity. The comparison of other G protein structures to the Rap2-GTP complex suggests that an equivalent interaction is likely to exist in their GTP form, whether unbound or bound to an effector. This interaction has to be released to allow the GAP-activated GTPase, and presumably the intrinsic GTPase activity as well. We also discuss the definition of the flexible regions and their hinges in the light of this structure and the expanding database of G protein structures. We propose that the switch I and switch II undergo either partial or complete disorder-to-order transitions according to their cellular status, thus defining a complex energy landscape comprising more than two conformational states. We observe in addition that the region connecting the switch I and switch II is flexible in Rap2 and other G proteins. This region may be important for protein-protein interactions and possibly behave as a conformational lever arm, as characterized for Arf. Taken together, these observations suggest that the structural mechanisms of small G proteins are significantly driven by entropy-based free energy changes.     

An Autoinhibited Noncanonical Mechanism of GTP Hydrolysis by Rheb Maintains mTORC1 Homeostasis

Rheb, an activator of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), displays low intrinsic GTPase activity favoring the biologically activated, GTP-bound state. We identified a Rheb mutation (Y35A) that increases its intrinsic nucleotide hydrolysis activity ～10-fold, and solved structures of both its active and inactive forms, revealing an unexpected mechanism of GTP hydrolysis involving Asp65 in switch II and Thr38 in switch I. In the wild-type protein this noncanonical mechanism is markedly inhibited by Tyr35, which constrains the active site conformation, restricting the access of the catalytic Asp65 to the nucleotide-binding pocket. Rheb Y35A mimics the enthalpic and entropic changes associated with GTP hydrolysis elicited by the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) TSC2, and is insensitive to further TSC2 stimulation. Overexpression of Rheb Y35A impaired the regulation of mTORC1 signaling by growth factor availability. We demonstrate that the opposing functions of Tyr35 in the intrinsic and GAP-stimulated GTP catalysis are critical for optimal mTORC1 regulation.     

On the mechanism of guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis in ras p21 proteins.

The residue Gln61 is assumed to play a major role in the mechanism of ras p21, and mutations of this residue are often found in human tumors. Such mutations lead to a major reduction in the rate of GTP hydrolysis by the complex of ras p21 and the GTPase activating protein (GAP) and lock the protein in a growth-promoting state. This work examines the role of Gln61 in ras p21 by using computer simulation approaches to correlate the structure and energetics of this system. Free energy perturbation calculations and simpler electrostatic considerations demonstrate that Gln61 is unlikely to serve as the general base in the intrinsic GAP-independent reaction of p21. Glutamine is already a very weak base in water, and surprisingly the GlnH+ OH-reaction intermediate is even less stable in the protein active site than in the corresponding reaction in water. The electrostatic field of Glu63, which could in principle stabilize the protonated Gln61, is found to be largely shielded by the surrounding solvent. However, it is still possible that Gln61 is a general base in the GAP/ras p21 complex since this system could enhance the electrostatic effect of Glu63. It is also possible that the gamma-phosphate acts as general base and that Gln61 accelerates the reaction by stabilizing the OH- nucleophile. If such a mechanism is operative, then GAP may enhance the effect of Gln61 by preorienting its hydrogen bonds in the transition-state configuration.     

Transformation efficiency of RasQ61 mutants linked to structural features of the switch regions in the presence of Raf

Transformation efficiencies of Ras mutants at residue 61 range over three orders of magnitude, but the in vitro GTPase activity decreases 10-fold for all mutants. We show that Raf impairs the GTPase activity of RasQ61L, suggesting that the Ras/Raf complex differentially modulates transformation. Our crystal structures show that, in transforming mutants, switch II takes part in a network of hydrophobic interactions burying the nucleotide and precatalytic water molecule. Our results suggest that Y32 and a water molecule bridging it to the gamma-phosphate in the wild-type structure play a role in GTP hydrolysis in lieu of the Arg finger in the absence of GAP. The bridging water molecule is absent in the transforming mutants, contributing to the burying of the nucleotide. We propose a mechanism for intrinsic hydrolysis in Raf-bound Ras and elucidate structural features in the Q61 mutants that correlate with their potency to transform cells.     

Essential role of histidine 84 in elongation factor Tu for the chemical step of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is a GTP-binding protein that delivers aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the ribosome during protein synthesis. The mechanism of GTP hydrolysis in EF-Tu on the ribosome is poorly understood. It is known that mutations of a conserved histidine residue in the switch II region of the factor, His84 in Escherichia coli EF-Tu, impair GTP hydrolysis. However, the partial reaction which is directly affected by mutations of His84 was not identified and the effect on GTP hydrolysis was not quantified. Here, we show that the replacement of His84 with Ala reduces the rate constant of GTP hydrolysis more than 10(6)-fold, whereas the preceding steps of ternary complex binding to the ribosome, codon recognition and, most importantly, the GTPase activation step are affected only slightly. These results show that His84 plays a key role in the chemical step of GTP hydrolysis. Rate constants of GTP hydrolysis by wild-type EF-Tu, measured using the slowly hydrolyzable GTP analog, GTPgammaS, showed no dependence on pH, indicating that His84 does not act as a general base. We propose that the catalytic role of His84 is to stabilize the transition state of GTP hydrolysis by hydrogen bonding to the attacking water molecule or, possibly, the gamma-phosphate group of GTP.     

Crystal structures at 2.2 A resolution of the catalytic domains of normal ras protein and an oncogenic mutant complexed with GDP

The biological functions of ras proteins are controlled by the bound guanine nucleotide GDP or GTP. The GTP-bound conformation is biologically active, and is rapidly deactivated to the GDP-bound conformation through interaction with GAP (GTPase Activating Protein). Most transforming mutants of ras proteins have drastically reduced GTP hydrolysis rates even in the presence of GAP. The crystal structures of the GDP complexes of ras proteins at 2.2 A resolution reveal the detailed interaction between the ras proteins and the GDP molecule. All the currently known transforming mutation positions are clustered around the bound guanine nucleotide molecule. The presumed "effector" region and the GAP recognition region are both highly exposed. No significant structural differences were found between the GDP complexes of normal ras protein and the oncogenic mutant with valine at position 12, except the side-chain of the valine residue. However, comparison with GTP-analog complexes of ras proteins suggests that the valine side-chain may inhibit GTP hydrolysis in two possible ways: (1) interacting directly with the gamma-phosphate and altering its orientation or the conformation of protein residues around the phosphates; and/or (2) preventing either the departure of gamma-phosphate on GTP hydrolysis or the entrance of a nucleophilic group to attack the gamma-phosphate. The structural similarity between ras protein and the bacterial elongation factor Tu suggests that their common structural motif might be conserved for other guanine nucleotide binding proteins.     

GTP hydrolysis mechanism of Ras-like GTPases

The Ras-like GTPases regulate diverse cellular functions via the chemical cycle of binding and hydrolyzing GTP molecules. They alternate between GTP- and GDP-bound conformations. The GTP-bound conformation is biologically active and promotes a cellular function, such as signal transduction, cytoskeleton organization, protein synthesis/translocation, or a membrane budding/fusion event. GTP hydrolysis turns off the GTPase switch by converting it to the inactive GDP-bound conformation. The fundamental GTP hydrolysis mechanism by these GTPases has generated considerable interest over the last two decades but remained to be firmly established. This review provides an update on the catalytic mechanism with discussions on recent developments from kinetic, structural, and model studies in the context of the various GTP hydrolysis models proposed over the years.     

The structure of Ras protein: a model for a universal molecular switch.

X-ray crystallography has revealed the molecular architecture of the cellular and oncogenic forms of p21Ha-ras, the protein encoded by the human Ha-ras gene, in both its active (GTP-bound) and in its inactive (GDP-bound) forms. From comparison of these two structures, a mechanism is suggested for the GTPase hydrolysis reaction that triggers the conformational change necessary for signal transduction. The structures have also allowed identification of the structural consequences of point mutations and the way in which they interfere with the intrinsic GTPase activity of p21ras. The p21ras structure is similar to that of the G-domain of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) from Escherichia coli, suggesting that p21ras can serve as a good model for other guanine nucleotide binding proteins.     

Simulation of the solution structure of the H-ras p21-GTP complex.

An unconstrained simulation of the GTP-bound form of the H-ras protein p21 is performed in an aqueous environment with charge-neutralizing counterions. The simulation is compared to the 1.35-A structure of Pai et al. [(1990) EMBO J. 9, 2351] and a proposed alternate structure, in which the loop at residues 60-65 is modeled into a form which may activate a water molecule for the GTP hydrolysis. The simulation suggests that some protein intermolecular H-bond contacts which are present in the crystal structure are lost in the solvation process and this loss may lead to localized refolding of the molecule. For instance, we find that the gamma-phosphate of the GTP has somewhat weaker contact with the protein in the simulation structure. The antiparallel beta-sheet (residues 38-57) partially melts. The 60-65 loop, which is hypervariable in the X-ray study, is initially relatively distant from the gamma-phosphate region. However, this loop moves so as to sample the space around the gamma-phosphate. For a significant fraction of the simulation time, forms similar to the alternate structure are observed, and a water molecule is localized near the hydrolytic site. The molecular dynamics simulations of p21-GTP in solution support a postulated hydrolysis mechanism for the biological inactivation of the nucleotide complex based on crystallographic data.     

Mechanisms of guanosine triphosphate hydrolysis by Ras and Ras-GAP proteins as rationalized by ab initio QM/MM simulations

The hydrolysis reaction of guanosine triphosphate (GTP) by p21(ras) (Ras) has been modeled by using the ab initio type quantum mechanical-molecular mechanical simulations. Initial geometry configurations have been prompted by atomic coordinates of the crystal structure (PDBID: 1QRA) corresponding to the prehydrolysis state of Ras in complex with GTP. Multiple searches of minimum energy geometry configurations consistent with the hydrogen bond networks have been performed, resulting in a series of stationary points on the potential energy surface for reaction intermediates and transition states. It is shown that the minimum energy reaction path is consistent with an assumption of a two-step mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. At the first stage, a unified action of the nearest residues of Ras and the nearest water molecules results in a substantial spatial separation of the gamma-phosphate group of GTP from the rest of the molecule (GDP). This phase of hydrolysis process proceeds through the low barrier (16.7 kcal/mol) transition state TS1. At the second stage, the inorganic phosphate is formed in consequence of proton transfers mediated by two water molecules and assisted by the Gln61 residue from Ras. The highest transition state at this segment, TS3, is estimated to have an energy 7.5 kcal/mol above the enzyme-substrate complex. The results of simulations are compared to the previous findings for the GTP hydrolysis in the Ras-GAP (p21(ras)-p120(GAP)) protein complex. Conclusions of the modeling lead to a better understanding of the anticatalytic effect of cancer causing mutation of Gln61 from Ras, which has been debated in recent years.     

Structural and functional analysis of the ARF1-ARFGAP complex reveals a role for coatomer in GTP hydrolysis

The crystal structure of the complex of ARF1 GTPase bound to GDP and the catalytic domain of ARF GTPase-activating protein (ARFGAP) has been determined at 1.95 A resolution. The ARFGAP molecule binds to switch 2 and helix alpha3 to orient ARF1 residues for catalysis, but it supplies neither arginine nor other amino acid side chains to the GTPase active site. In the complex, the effector-binding region appears to be unobstructed, suggesting that ARFGAP could stimulate GTP hydrolysis while ARF1 maintains an interaction with its effector, the coatomer complex of COPI-coated vesicles. Biochemical experiments show that coatomer directly participates in the GTPase reaction, accelerating GTP hydrolysis a further 1000-fold in an ARFGAP-dependent manner. Thus, a tripartite complex controls the GTP hydrolysis reaction triggering disassembly of COPI vesicle coats.     

Crystallographic evidence for substrate-assisted GTP hydrolysis by a small GTP binding protein

GTP hydrolysis by small GTP binding proteins of the Ras superfamily is a universal reaction that controls multiple cellular regulations. Its enzymic mechanism has been the subject of long-standing debates as to the existence/identity of the general base and the electronic nature of its transition state. Here we report the high-resolution crystal structure of a small GTP binding protein, Rab11, solved in complex with GDP and Pi. Unexpectedly, a Pi oxygen and the GDP-cleaved oxygen are located less than 2.5 A apart, suggesting that they share a proton, likely in the form of a low-barrier hydrogen bond. This implies that the gamma-phosphate of GTP was protonated; hence, that GTP acts as a general base. Furthermore, this interaction should establish at, and stabilize, the transition state. Altogether, we propose a revised model for the GTPase reaction that should reconcile earlier models into a unique substrate-assisted mechanism.     

Kinetic analysis of the hydrolysis of GTP by p21N-ras. The basal GTPase mechanism

The rate constants have been determined for elementary steps in the basal GTPase mechanism of normal p21N-ras (Gly-12) and an oncogenic mutant (Asp-12): namely GTP binding, hydrolysis, phosphate release, and GDP release. By extrapolation from data at lower temperatures, the GTP association rate constant at 37 degrees C is 1.4 x 10(8) M-1 s-1 for the normal protein and 4.8 x 10(8) M-1 s-1 for the mutant. Other rate constants were measured directly at 37 degrees C, and three processes have similar slow values. GTP dissociation is at 1.0 x 10(-4) s-1 (normal) and 5.0 x 10(-4) s-1 (mutant). The hydrolysis step is at 3.4 x 10(-4) s-1 (normal) and 1.5 x 10(-4) s-1 (mutant). GDP dissociates at 4.2 x 10(-4) s-1 (normal) and 2.0 x 10(-4) s-1 (mutant). GDP association rate constants are similar to those for GTP, 0.5 x 10(8) M-1 s-1 for normal and 0.7 x 10(8) M-1 s-1 for mutant. Both hydrolysis and GDP release therefore contribute to rate limitation of the basal GTPase activity. There are distinct differences (up to 5-fold) between rate constants for the normal and mutant proteins at a number of steps. The values are consistent with the reduced GTPase activity for this mutant and suggest little difference between normal and mutant proteins in the relative steady-state concentrations of GTP and GDP complexes that may represent active and inactive states. The results are discussed in terms of the likely role of p21ras in transmembrane signalling.     

Structural basis of activation and GTP hydrolysis in Rab proteins

BACKGROUND: Rab proteins comprise a large family of GTPases that regulate vesicle trafficking. Despite conservation of critical residues involved in nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, Rab proteins exhibit low sequence identity with other GTPases, and the structural basis for Rab function remains poorly characterized. RESULTS: The 2. 0 A crystal structure of GppNHp-bound Rab3A reveals the structural determinants that stabilize the active conformation and regulate GTPase activity. The active conformation is stabilized by extensive hydrophobic contacts between the switch I and switch II regions. Serine residues in the phosphate-binding loop (P loop) and switch I region mediate unexpected interactions with the gamma phosphate of GTP that have not been observed in previous GTPase structures. Residues implicated in the interaction with effectors and regulatory factors map to a common face of the protein. The electrostatic potential at the surface of Rab3A indicates a non-uniform distribution of charged and nonpolar residues. CONCLUSIONS: The major structural determinants of the active conformation involve residues that are conserved throughout the Rab family, indicating a common mode of activation. Novel interactions with the gamma phosphate impose stereochemical constraints on the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis and provide a structural explanation for the large variation of GTPase activity within the Rab family. An asymmetric distribution of charged and nonpolar residues suggests a plausible orientation with respect to vesicle membranes, positioning predominantly hydrophobic surfaces for interaction with membrane-associated effectors and regulatory factors. Thus, the structure of Rab3A establishes a framework for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the function of Rab GTPases.     

Interactions of GTP with the ATP-grasp domain of GTP-specific succinyl-CoA synthetase

Two isoforms of succinyl-CoA synthetase exist in mammals, one specific for ATP and the other for GTP. The GTP-specific form of pig succinyl-CoA synthetase has been crystallized in the presence of GTP and the structure determined to 2.1 A resolution. GTP is bound in the ATP-grasp domain, where interactions of the guanine base with a glutamine residue (Gln-20beta) and with backbone atoms provide the specificity. The gamma-phosphate interacts with the side chain of an arginine residue (Arg-54beta) and with backbone amide nitrogen atoms, leading to tight interactions between the gamma-phosphate and the protein. This contrasts with the structures of ATP bound to other members of the family of ATP-grasp proteins where the gamma-phosphate is exposed, free to react with the other substrate. To test if GDP would interact with GTP-specific succinyl-CoA synthetase in the same way that ADP interacts with other members of the family of ATP-grasp proteins, the structure of GDP bound to GTP-specific succinyl-CoA synthetase was also determined. A comparison of the conformations of GTP and GDP shows that the bases adopt the same position but that changes in conformation of the ribose moieties and the alpha- and beta-phosphates allow the gamma-phosphate to interact with the arginine residue and amide nitrogen atoms in GTP, while the beta-phosphate interacts with these residues in GDP. The complex of GTP with succinyl-CoA synthetase shows that the enzyme is able to protect GTP from hydrolysis when the active-site histidine residue is not in position to be phosphorylated.     

CD2 antigen mediated activation of the guanine nucleotide binding proteins p21ras in human T lymphocytes.

T cell stimulation via the TCR complex (TCR/CD3 complex) results in activation of the guanine nucleotide binding proteins encoded by the ras protooncogenes (p21ras). In the present study we show that the activation state of p21ras in T lymphocytes can also be controlled by triggering of the CD2 Ag. The activation state of p21ras is controlled by GTP levels on p21ras. In T cells stimulation of protein kinase C is able to induce an accumulation of "active" p21ras-GTP complexes due to an inhibitory effect of protein kinase C stimulation on the intrinsic GTPase activity of p21ras. The regulatory effect of protein kinase C on p21ras GTPase activity appears to be mediated via regulation of GAP, the GTPase activating protein of p21ras. In the present report, we demonstrate that the TCR/CD3 complex and the CD2 Ag control the accumulation of p21ras-GTP complexes via a regulatory effect on p21ras GTPase activity. The TCR/CD3 complex and CD2 Ag are also able to control the cellular activity of GAP. These data demonstrate that p21ras is part of the signal transduction responses controlled by the CD2 Ag, and reveal that the TCR/CD3 complex and CD2 Ag control the activation state of p21ras via a similar mechanism.     

Purification and characterization from bovine brain cytosol of a novel regulatory protein inhibiting the dissociation of GDP from and the subsequent binding of GTP to rhoB p20, a ras p21-like GTP-binding protein

A novel regulatory protein for the rho proteins (rhoA p21 and rhoB p20), belonging to a ras p21/ras p21-like small molecular weight (Mr) GTP-binding protein (G protein) superfamily, was purified to near homogeneity from bovine brain cytosol and characterized. This regulatory protein, designated here as GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) for the rho proteins (rho GDI), inhibited the dissociation of GDP from rhoB p20 and the binding of guanosine 5'-(3-O-thio)triphosphate (GTP gamma S) to the GDP-bound form of rhoB p20 but not of that to the guanine nucleotide-free form. The Mr value of rho GDI was estimated to be about 27,000 by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and from the S value, indicating that rho GDI is composed of a single polypeptide without a subunit structure. The isoelectric point was about pH 5.7. rho GDI made a complex with the GDP-bound form of rhoB p20 with a molar ratio of 1:1 but not with the GTP gamma S-bound or guanine nucleotide-free form. rho GDI did not stimulate the GTPase activity of rhoB p20 and by itself showed neither GTP gamma S-binding nor GTPase activity. rho GDI was equally active for rhoA p21 and rhoB p20 but was inactive for other ras p21/ras p21-like G proteins including c-Ha-ras p21, smg p25A, and smg p21. rho GDI activity was detected in the cytosol fraction of various rat tissues. These results indicate that, in mammalian tissues, there is a novel type of regulatory protein specific for the rho proteins that interacts with the GDP-bound form of the rho proteins and thereby regulates the GDP/GTP exchange reaction of the rho proteins by inhibiting the dissociation of GDP from and the subsequent binding of GTP to them. Since there is a GTPase-activating protein for the rho proteins stimulating the GTPase activity of the rho proteins in mammalian tissues, the rho proteins appear to be regulated at least by GTPase-activating protein and GDI in a dual manner.