TOR and S6K1 promote translation reinitiation of uORF‐containing mRNAs via phosphorylation of eIF3h

Mammalian target‐of‐rapamycin (mTOR) triggers S6 kinase (S6K) activation to phosphorylate targets linked to translation in response to energy, nutrients, and hormones. Pathways of TOR activation in plants remain unknown. Here, we uncover the role of the phytohormone auxin in TOR signalling activation and reinitiation after upstream open reading frame (uORF) translation, which in plants is dependent on translation initiation factor eIF3h. We show that auxin triggers TOR activation followed by S6K1 phosphorylation at T449 and efficient loading of uORF‐mRNAs onto polysomes in a manner sensitive to the TOR inhibitor Torin‐1. Torin‐1 mediates recruitment of inactive S6K1 to polysomes, while auxin triggers S6K1 dissociation and recruitment of activated TOR instead. A putative target of TOR/S6K1—eIF3h—is phosphorylated and detected in polysomes in response to auxin. In TOR‐deficient plants, polysomes were prebound by inactive S6K1, and loading of uORF‐mRNAs and eIF3h was impaired. Transient expression of eIF3h‐S178D in plant protoplasts specifically upregulates uORF‐mRNA translation. We propose that TOR functions in polysomes to maintain the active S6K1 (and thus eIF3h) phosphorylation status that is critical for translation reinitiation.     

The Arabidopsis small G protein ROP2 is activated by light in guard cells and inhibits light-induced stomatal opening

ROP small G proteins function as molecular switches in diverse signaling processes. Here, we investigated signals that activate ROP2 in guard cells. In guard cells of Vicia faba expressing Arabidopsis thaliana constitutively active (CA) ROP2 fused to red fluorescent protein (RFP-CA-ROP2), fluorescence localized exclusively at the plasma membrane, whereas a dominant negative version of RFP-ROP2 (DN-ROP2) localized in the cytoplasm. In guard cells expressing green fluorescent protein-ROP2, the relative fluorescence intensity at the plasma membrane increased upon illumination, suggesting that light activates ROP2. Unlike previously reported light-activated factors, light-activated ROP2 inhibits rather than accelerates light-induced stomatal opening; stomata bordered by guard cells transformed with CA-rop2 opened less than controls upon light irradiation. When introduced into guard cells together with CA-ROP2, At RhoGDI1, which encodes a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor, inhibited plasma membrane localization of CA-ROP2 and abolished the inhibitory effect of CA-ROP2 on light-induced stomatal opening, supporting the negative effect of active ROP2 on stomatal opening. Mutant rop2 Arabidopsis guard cells showed phenotypes similar to those of transformed V. faba guard cells; CA-rop2 stomata opened more slowly and to a lesser extent, and DN-rop2 stomata opened faster than wild-type stomata in response to light. Moreover, in rop2 knockout plants, stomata opened faster and to a greater extent than wild-type stomata in response to light. Thus, ROP2 is a light-activated negative factor that attenuates the extent of light-induced changes in stomatal aperture. The inhibition of light-induced stomatal opening by light-activated ROP2 suggests the existence of feedback regulatory mechanisms through which stomatal apertures may be finely controlled.     

Viral factor TAV recruits TOR/S6K1 signalling to activate reinitiation after long ORF translation

The protein kinase TOR (target-of-rapamycin) upregulates translation initiation in eukaryotes, but initiation restart after long ORF translation is restricted by largely unknown pathways. The plant viral reinitiation factor transactivator-viroplasmin (TAV) exceptionally promotes reinitiation through a mechanism involving retention on 80S and reuse of eIF3 and the host factor reinitiation-supporting protein (RISP) to regenerate reinitiation-competent ribosomal complexes. Here, we show that TAV function in reinitiation depends on physical association with TOR, with TAV-TOR binding being critical for both translation reinitiation and viral fitness. Consistently, TOR-deficient plants are resistant to viral infection. TAV triggers TOR hyperactivation and S6K1 phosphorylation in planta. When activated, TOR binds polyribosomes concomitantly with polysomal accumulation of eIF3 and RISP--a novel and specific target of TOR/S6K1--in a TAV-dependent manner, with RISP being phosphorylated. TAV mutants defective in TOR binding fail to recruit TOR, thereby abolishing RISP phosphorylation in polysomes and reinitiation. Thus, activation of reinitiation after long ORF translation is more complex than previously appreciated, with TOR/S6K1 upregulation being the key event in the formation of reinitiation-competent ribosomal complexes.     

Arabidopsis ROP9 and ROP10 GTPases differentially regulate auxin and ABA responses

Auxin and abscisic acid (ABA) are major plant hormones that act together to modulate numerous aspects of plant growth and development, including seed germination, primary root elongation, and lateral root formation. In this study, we analyzed the loss-of-function mutants of two closely related ROP (Rho of plants) GTPases, ROP9 and ROP10, and found that these ROP GTPases differentially regulate the auxin and ABA responses. rop9 and rop10 mutations enhanced the ABA-induced suppression of seed germination, primary root growth, and lateral root formation and the expression of ABA-responsive genes, whereas rop9 but not rop10 suppressed auxin-induced root phenotypes and auxin-responsive gene expression. These results suggest that both ROP9 and ROP10 function as negative regulators of ABA signaling, and that ROP9, but not ROP10, functions as a positive regulator of auxin signaling. Previously, ROPinteractive CRIB motif-containing protein 1 (RIC1) was reported to participate in auxin and ABA responses, and to have a similar effect as ROP9 and ROP10 on gene expression, root development, and seed germination. Because RIC proteins mediate ROP GTPase signaling, our results suggest that ROP9 and ROP10 GTPases function upstream of RIC1 in auxin- and ABA-regulated root development and seed germination.     

Phosphatidic acid induces leaf cell death in Arabidopsis by activating the Rho-related small G protein GTPase-mediated pathway of reactive oxygen species generation

Phosphatidic acid (PA) level increases during various stress conditions. However, the physiological roles of this lipid in stress response remain largely unknown. In this study, we report that PA induced leaf cell death and elevated the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the whole leaf and single cells. To further elucidate the mechanism of PA-induced cell death, we then examined whether Rho-related small G protein (ROP) 2, which enhanced ROS production in an in vitro assay, is involved in PA-induced ROS production and cell death. In response to PA, transgenic leaves of Arabidopsis expressing a constitutively active rop2 mutant exhibited earlier cell death and higher levels of ROS than wild type (WT), whereas those expressing a dominant-negative rop2 mutant exhibited later cell death and lower ROS. However, in the absence of exogenous PA, no spontaneous cell death or elevated ROS was observed in constitutively active rop2 plants, suggesting that the activation of ROP GTPase alone is insufficient to activate the ROP-mediated ROS generation pathway. These results suggest that PA modulates an additional factor required for the active ROP-mediated ROS generation pathway. Therefore, PA may be an important regulator of ROP-regulated ROS generation and the cell death process during various stress and defense responses of plants.     

Phosphorylation of a reinitiation supporting protein,RISP, determines its function in translation reinitiation

Reinitiation supporting protein, RISP, interacts with 60S (60S ribosomal subunit) and eIF3 (eukaryotic initiation factor 3) in plants. TOR (target-of-rapamycin) mediates RISP phosphorylation at residue Ser267, favoring its binding to eL24 (60S ribosomal protein L24). In a viral context, RISP, when phosphorylated, binds the CaMV transactivator/ viroplasmin, TAV, to assist in an exceptional mechanism of reinitiation after long ORF translation. Moreover, we show here that RISP interacts with eIF2 via eIF2β and TOR downstream target 40S ribosomal protein eS6. A RISP phosphorylation knockout, RISP-S267A, binds preferentially eIF2β, and both form a ternary complex with eIF3a in vitro. Accordingly, transient overexpression in plant protoplasts of RISP-S267A, but not a RISP phosphorylation mimic, RISP-S267D, favors translation initiation. In contrast, RISP-S267D preferentially binds eS6, and, when bound to the C-terminus of eS6, can capture 60S in a highly specific manner in vitro, suggesting that it mediates 60S loading during reinitiation. Indeed, eS6-deficient plants are highly resistant to CaMV due to their reduced reinitiation capacity. Strikingly, an eS6 phosphomimic, when stably expressed in eS6-deficient plants, can fully restore the reinitiation deficiency of these plants in cellular and viral contexts. These results suggest that RISP function in translation (re)initiation is regulated by phosphorylation at Ser267.     

A ROP2‐RIC1 pathway fine‐tunes microtubule reorganization for salt tolerance in Arabidopsis

The reorganization of microtubules induced by salt stress is required for Arabidopsis survival under high salinity conditions. RIC1 is an effector of Rho‐related GTPase from plants (ROPs) and a known microtubule‐associated protein. In this study, we demonstrated that RIC1 expression decreased with long‐term NaCl treatment, and ric1‐1 seedlings exhibited a higher survival rate under salt stress. We found that RIC1 reduced the frequency of microtubule transition from shortening to growing status and knockout of RIC1 improved the reassembly of depolymerized microtubules caused by either oryzalin treatment or salt stress. Further investigation showed that constitutively active ROP2 promoted the reassembly of microtubules and the survival of seedlings under salt stress. A rop2‐1 ric1‐1 double mutant rescued the salt‐sensitive phenotype of rop2‐1, indicating that ROP2 functions in salt tolerance through RIC1. Although ROP2 did not regulate RIC1 expression upon salt stress, a quick but mild increase of ROP2 activity was induced, led to reduction of RIC1 on microtubules. Collectively, our study reveals an ROP2‐RIC1 pathway that fine‐tunes microtubule dynamics in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis. This finding not only reveals a new regulatory mechanism for microtubule reorganization under salt stress but also the importance of ROP signalling for salinity tolerance.     

ROP GTPase-dependent actin microfilaments promote PIN1 polarization by localized inhibition of clathrin-dependent endocytosis

Cell polarization via asymmetrical distribution of structures or molecules is essential for diverse cellular functions and development of organisms, but how polarity is developmentally controlled has been poorly understood. In plants, the asymmetrical distribution of the PIN-FORMED (PIN) proteins involved in the cellular efflux of the quintessential phytohormone auxin plays a central role in developmental patterning, morphogenesis, and differential growth. Recently we showed that auxin promotes cell interdigitation by activating the Rho family ROP GTPases in leaf epidermal pavement cells. Here we found that auxin activation of the ROP2 signaling pathway regulates the asymmetric distribution of PIN1 by inhibiting its endocytosis. ROP2 inhibits PIN1 endocytosis via the accumulation of cortical actin microfilaments induced by the ROP2 effector protein RIC4. Our findings suggest a link between the developmental auxin signal and polar PIN1 distribution via Rho-dependent cytoskeletal reorganization and reveal the conservation of a design principle for cell polarization that is based on Rho GTPase-mediated inhibition of endocytosis.     

The Arabidopsis Rho of Plants GTPase AtROP6 Functions in Developmental and Pathogen Response Pathways

How plants coordinate developmental processes and environmental stress responses is a pressing question. Here, we show that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Rho of Plants6 (AtROP6) integrates developmental and pathogen response signaling. AtROP6 expression is induced by auxin and detected in the root meristem, lateral root initials, and leaf hydathodes. Plants expressing a dominant negative AtROP6 (rop6^DN) under the regulation of its endogenous promoter are small and have multiple inflorescence stems, twisted leaves, deformed leaf epidermis pavement cells, and differentially organized cytoskeleton. Microarray analyses of rop6^DN plants revealed that major changes in gene expression are associated with constitutive salicylic acid (SA)-mediated defense responses. In agreement, their free and total SA levels resembled those of wild-type plants inoculated with a virulent powdery mildew pathogen. The constitutive SA-associated response in rop6^DN was suppressed in mutant backgrounds defective in SA signaling (nonexpresser of PR genes1 [npr1]) or biosynthesis (salicylic acid induction deficient2 [sid2]). However, the rop6^DN npr1 and rop6^DN sid2 double mutants retained the aberrant developmental phenotypes, indicating that the constitutive SA response can be uncoupled from ROP function(s) in development. rop6^DN plants exhibited enhanced preinvasive defense responses to a host-adapted virulent powdery mildew fungus but were impaired in preinvasive defenses upon inoculation with a nonadapted powdery mildew. The host-adapted powdery mildew had a reduced reproductive fitness on rop6^DN plants, which was retained in mutant backgrounds defective in SA biosynthesis or signaling. Our findings indicate that both the morphological aberrations and altered sensitivity to powdery mildews of rop6^DN plants result from perturbations that are independent from the SA-associated response. These perturbations uncouple SA-dependent defense signaling from disease resistance execution.Rho of Plants (ROPs), also known as RACs (for clarity, the ROP nomenclature will be used throughout this article), comprise a plant-specific group of Rho family small G proteins. Like other members of the Ras superfamily of small G proteins, ROPs function as molecular switches, existing in a GTP-bound “on” state and a GDP-bound “off” state. In the GTP-bound state, ROPs interact with specific effectors that transduce downstream signaling or function as scaffolds for interaction with additional effector molecules (Berken and Wittinghofer, 2008). Conserved point mutations in the G1 (P loop) Gly-15 or the G3 (switch II) Gln-64, which abolish GTP hydrolysis, or the G1 Thr-20 or G4 Asp-121 that compromise GDP/GTP exchange, can form either constitutively active or dominant negative mutants, respectively (Feig, 1999; Berken et al., 2005; Berken and Wittinghofer, 2008; Sorek et al., 2010). Primarily based on studies with neomorphic mutants, ROPs have been implicated in the regulation of cytoskeleton organization and dynamics, vesicle trafficking, auxin transport and response, abscisic acid (ABA) response, and response to pathogens (Nibau et al., 2006; Yalovsky et al., 2008; Yang, 2008; Lorek et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2011; and refs. therein).In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), there are 11 ROP proteins (Winge et al., 1997). Assigning specific functions to individual members of this family is difficult, however, because ROPs are functionally redundant. A ROP10 loss-of-function mutant was reported to be ABA hypersensitive (Zheng et al., 2002), displaying enhanced expression of tens of genes in response to ABA treatments (Xin et al., 2005). However, in the absence of exogenous ABA, gene expression in the rop10 mutant was similar to that in wild-type plants (Xin et al., 2005). Loss of leaf epidermis pavement cell polarity was reported for rop4 rop2-RNAi (for RNA interference) double mutant plants (Fu et al., 2005). Mild changes in pavement and hypocotyl cell structure and microtubule (MT) organization were reported for a rop6 loss-of-function mutant (Fu et al., 2009).The involvement of ROPs in auxin-regulated development has been addressed in several studies (Wu et al., 2011). Ectopic expression of a dominant negative ROP2 (rop2^DN) mutant under regulation of the 35S promoter resulted in a loss of apical dominance and a reduction in the number of lateral roots. In contrast, ectopic expression of constitutively active ROP2 (rop2^CA) caused an increase in the number of lateral roots and an enhanced decrease in primary root length in response to auxin. Consistent with these findings, the expression of a constitutively active NtRAC1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) protoplasts induced the expression of auxin-regulated genes in the absence of auxin and promoted the formation of protein nuclear bodies containing components of the proteasome and COP9 signalosome (Tao et al., 2002, 2005; Wu et al., 2011). The ROP effector ICR1 (for interactor of constitutively active ROP1) regulates polarized secretion and is required for polar auxin transport (Lavy et al., 2007; Bloch et al., 2008; Hazak et al., 2010; Hazak and Yalovsky, 2010). In the root, local auxin gradients induce the accumulation of ROPs in trichoblasts at the site of future root hair formation (Fischer et al., 2006). Recently, it was shown that interdigitation of leaf epidermis pavement cells depends on Auxin-Binding Protein1 (ABP1)-mediated ROP activation (Xu et al., 2010). Taken together, these data indicate that ROPs are involved in both mediating the auxin response and facilitating directional auxin transport. It is still unclear, however, which ROPs function in these processes.ROP function was linked to plant defense responses in several studies. In rice (Oryza sativa), OsRAC1 is a positive regulator of the hypersensitive response, possibly through interactions with the NADPH oxidase RbohB, Required for Mla12 Resistance, and Heat Shock Protein90 (Ono et al., 2001; Thao et al., 2007; Wong et al., 2007). Interestingly, other members of the rice ROP family, namely RAC4 and RAC5, are negative regulators of resistance to the rice blast pathogen Magnaporthe grisea (Chen et al., 2010). Similar to rice, when expressed in tobacco, dominant negative OsRAC1 suppressed the hypersensitive response (Moeder et al., 2005). In barley (Hordeum vulgare), several constitutively active ROP/RAC mutants and a MT-associated ROPGAP1 loss-of-function mutant enhanced susceptibility to the powdery mildew Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh). The activated ROP-enhanced susceptibility to Bgh was attributed to disorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and was shown to depend on Mildew Resistance Locus O (MLO; Schultheiss et al., 2002, 2003; Opalski et al., 2005; Hoefle et al., 2011). In barley, three ROP proteins, HvRACB, HvRAC1, and HvRAC3, were linked to both development and pathogen response (Schultheiss et al., 2005; Pathuri et al., 2008; Hoefle et al., 2011).We have analyzed the function of the Arabidopsis AtROP6 (ROP6) by characterizing its expression pattern and its regulation by auxin and the phenotype of plants that express rop6^DN under the regulation of its endogenous promoter. The utilization of the dominant negative mutant overcame functional redundancy, while expression under the regulation of the endogenous promoter enabled the analysis of ROP6 function in a developmental context. Phenotypic and gene expression analyses indicate that ROP6 functions in developmental, salicylic acid (SA)-dependent, and SA-independent defense response pathways.     

Emerging links between initiation of translation and human diseases

Some diseases are caused by mutations that perturb the initiation step of translation by changing the context around the AUG(START) codon or introducing upstream AUG codons. The scanning mechanism provides a framework for understanding the effects of these and other structural changes in mRNAs derived from oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and other key regulatory genes. In mRNAs from mutated as well as normal genes, translation sometimes initiates from an internal AUG codon. Sanctioned mechanisms that allow this, including leaky scanning and reinitiation, are discussed. Thrombopoietin mRNA is an example in which translation normally initiates from an internal position via an inefficient reinitiation mechanism. Mutations that restructure this mRNA in ways that elevate production of thrombopoietin cause hereditary thrombocythemia, demonstrating that some mRNAs are designed deliberately with upstream AUG codons to preclude efficient translation and thus to prevent harmful overproduction of potent proteins. While upstream AUG codons in certain mRNAs thus play an important regulatory role, the frequency of upstream AUG codons tends to be exaggerated when cDNA sequences are compiled and analyzed. Because the discovery of mutations that perturb translation usually begins with cDNA analysis, some misunderstandings vis-a-vis the interpretation of cDNA sequences are discussed.     

ROP11 GTPase Negatively Regulates ABA Signaling by Protecting ABI1 Phosphatase Activity from Inhibition by the ABA Receptor RCAR1/PYL9 in Arabidopsis

The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) regulates many key processes in plants, such as seed germina- tion, seedling growth, and abiotic stress tolerance. In recent years, a minimal set of core components of a major ABA signaling pathway has been discovered. These components include a RCAR/PYR/PYL family of ABA receptors, a group of PP2C phosphatases, and three SnRK2 kinases. However, how the interactions between the receptors and their targets are regulated by other proteins remains largely unknown. In a companion paper published in this issue, we showed that ROP11, a member of the plant- specific Rho-like small GTPase family, negatively regulates multiple ABA responses in Arabidopsis. The current work demonstrated that the constitutively active ROP11 (CA-ROP11) can modulate the RCAR1/PYL9-mediated ABA signaling pathway based on reconstitution assays in Arabidopsis thaliana protoplasts. Furthermore, using luciferase complementation imaging, yeast two-hybrid assays, co- immunoprecipitation assays in Nicotiana benthamiana and bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays, we demonstrated that CA-ROP11 directly interacts with ABI1, a signaling component downstream of RCAR1/PYL9. Finally, we provided biochemical evidence that CA-ROP11 protects ABI1 phosphatase activity from inhibition by RCAR1/PYL9 and thus negatively regulates ABA signaling in plant cells. A model of how ROP11 acts to negatively regulate ABA signaling is presented.     

An Arabidopsis kinase cascade influences auxin‐responsive cell expansion

Mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MPK) cascades are conserved mechanisms of signal transduction across eukaryotes. Despite the importance of MPK proteins in signaling events, specific roles for many Arabidopsis MPK proteins remain unknown. Multiple studies have suggested roles for MPK signaling in a variety of auxin‐related processes. To identify MPK proteins with roles in auxin response, we screened mpk insertional alleles and identified mpk1‐1 as a mutant that displays hypersensitivity in auxin‐responsive cell expansion assays. Further, mutants defective in the upstream MAP kinase kinase MKK3 also display hypersensitivity in auxin‐responsive cell expansion assays, suggesting that this MPK cascade affects auxin‐influenced cell expansion. We found that MPK1 interacts with and phosphorylates ROP BINDING PROTEIN KINASE 1 (RBK1), a protein kinase that interacts with members of the Rho‐like GTPases from Plants (ROP) small GTPase family. Similar to mpk1‐1 and mkk3‐1 mutants, rbk1 insertional mutants display auxin hypersensitivity, consistent with a possible role for RBK1 downstream of MPK1 in influencing auxin‐responsive cell expansion. We found that RBK1 directly phosphorylates ROP4 and ROP6, supporting the possibility that RBK1 effects on auxin‐responsive cell expansion are mediated through phosphorylation‐dependent modulation of ROP activity. Our data suggest a MKK3 ? MPK1 ? RBK1 phosphorylation cascade that may provide a dynamic module for altering cell expansion.     

A ROP GTPase-dependent auxin signaling pathway regulates the subcellular distribution of PIN2 in Arabidopsis roots

PIN-FORMED (PIN) protein-mediated auxin polar transport is critically important for development, pattern formation, and morphogenesis in plants. Auxin has been implicated in the regulation of polar auxin transport by inhibiting PIN endocytosis, but how auxin regulates this process is poorly understood. Our genetic screen identified the Arabidopsis SPIKE1 (SPK1) gene whose loss-of-function mutations increased lateral root density and retarded gravitropic responses, as do pin2 knockout mutations. SPK1 belongs to the conserved DHR2-Dock family of Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors. The spk1 mutations induced PIN2 internalization that was not suppressed by auxin, as did the loss-of-function mutations for Rho-like GTPase from Plants 6 (ROP6)-GTPase or its effector RIC1. Furthermore, SPK1 was required for auxin induction of ROP6 activation. Our results have established a Rho GTPase-based auxin signaling pathway that maintains PIN2 polar distribution to the plasma membrane via inhibition of its internalization in Arabidopsis roots. Our findings provide new insights into signaling mechanisms that underlie the regulation of the dynamic trafficking of PINs required for long-distance auxin transport and that link auxin signaling to PIN-mediated pattern formation and morphogenesis.     

Smart-ORF: a single-molecule method for accessing ribosome dynamics in both upstream and main open reading frames

Upstream open reading frame (uORF) translation disrupts scanning 43S flux on mRNA and modulates main open reading frame (mORF) translation efficiency. Current tools, however, have limited access to ribosome dynamics in both upstream and main ORFs of an mRNA. Here, we develop a new two-color in vitro fluorescence assay, Smart-ORF, that monitors individual uORF and mORF translation events in real-time with single-molecule resolution. We demonstrate the utility of Smart-ORF by applying it to uORF-encoded arginine attenuator peptide (AAP)-mediated translational regulation. The method enabled quantification of uORF and mORF initiation efficiencies, 80S dwell time, polysome formation, and the correlation between uORF and mORF translation dynamics. Smart-ORF revealed that AAP-mediated 80S stalling in the uORF stimulates the uORF initiation efficiency and promotes clustering of slower uORF-translating ribosomes. This technology provides a new tool that can reveal previously uncharacterized dynamics of uORF-containing mRNA translation.     

Reassessment of the Role of TSC,mTORC1 and MicroRNAs in Amino Acids-Meditated Translational Control of TOP mRNAs

TOP mRNAs encode components of the translational apparatus, and repression of their translation comprises one mechanism, by which cells encountering amino acid deprivation downregulate the biosynthesis of the protein synthesis machinery. This mode of regulation involves TSC as knockout of TSC1 or TSC2 rescued TOP mRNAs translation in amino acid-starved cells. The involvement of mTOR in translational control of TOP mRNAs is demonstrated by the ability of constitutively active mTOR to relieve the translational repression of TOP mRNA upon amino acid deprivation. Consistently, knockdown of this kinase as well as its inhibition by pharmacological means blocked amino acid-induced translational activation of these mRNAs. The signaling of amino acids to TOP mRNAs involves RagB, as overexpression of active RagB derepressed the translation of these mRNAs in amino acid-starved cells. Nonetheless, knockdown of raptor or rictor failed to suppress translational activation of TOP mRNAs by amino acids, suggesting that mTORC1 or mTORC2 plays a minor, if any, role in this mode of regulation. Finally, miR10a has previously been suggested to positively regulate the translation of TOP mRNAs. However, we show here that titration of this microRNA failed to downregulate the basal translation efficiency of TOP mRNAs. Moreover, Drosha knockdown or Dicer knockout, which carries out the first and second processing steps in microRNAs biosynthesis, respectively, failed to block the translational activation of TOP mRNAs by amino acid or serum stimulation. Evidently, these results are questioning the positive role of microRNAs in this mode of regulation.