Properties of the Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins involved in DNA repair, recombination and mutagenesis

The ruvA and ruvB genes constitute an operon, which is regulated by the SOS system and involved in DNA repair, recombination and mutagenesis. RuvA protein binds to both single-stranded and double-stranded DNA. RuvB protein has weak ATPase activity. RuvA bound to DNA greatly enhances ATPase activity of RuvB. UV-irradiation to supercoiled DNA further enhances the stimulatory effect of RuvA on the RuvB ATPase activity. In the presence of ATP the RuvA-RuvB complex has an activity that renatures cruciform structures formed by heating and gradually cooling supercoiled DNA with an inverted repeat. These findings suggest that the RuvA-RuvB complex interacts with an irregular conformation in damaged DNA and induces conformational changes in DNA using energy provided by ATP hydrolysis, so that it facilitates DNA repair, recombination and error prone replication.     

A unique beta-hairpin protruding from AAA+ ATPase domain of RuvB motor protein is involved in the interaction with RuvA DNA recognition protein for branch migration of Holliday junctions.

The Escherichia coli RuvB protein is a motor protein that forms a complex with RuvA and promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions during homologous recombination. This study describes the characteristics of two RuvB mutants, I148T and I150T, that do not promote branch migration in the presence of RuvA. These RuvB mutants hydrolyzed ATP and bound duplex DNA with the same efficiency as wild-type RuvB, but the mutants did not form a complex with RuvA and were defective in loading onto junction DNA in a RuvA-assisted manner. A recent crystallographic study revealed that Ile(148) and Ile(150) are in a unique beta-hairpin that protrudes from the AAA(+) ATPase domain of RuvB. We propose that this beta-hairpin interacts with hydrophobic residues in the mobile third domain of RuvA and that this interaction is vital for the RuvA-assisted loading of RuvB onto Holliday junction DNA.     

Helicase-defective RuvB(D113E) promotes RuvAB-mediated branch migration in vitro.

In Escherichia coli, the RuvA and RuvB proteins interact at Holliday junctions to promote branch migration leading to the formation of heteroduplex DNA. RuvA provides junction-binding specificity and RuvB drives ATP-dependent branch migration. Since RuvB contains sequence motifs characteristic of a DNA helicase and RuvAB exhibit helicase activity in vitro, we have analysed the role of DNA unwinding in relation to branch migration. A mutant RuvB protein, RuvB(D113E), mutated in helicase motif II (the DExx box), has been purified to homogeneity. The mutant protein forms hexameric rings on DNA similar to those formed by wild-type protein and promotes branch migration in the presence of RuvA. However, RuvB(D113E) exhibits reduced ATPase activity and is severely compromised in its DNA helicase activity. Models for RuvAB-mediated branch migration that invoke only limited DNA unwinding activity are proposed.     

The RuvA homologues from Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae exhibit unique functional characteristics

The DNA recombination and repair machineries of Mycoplasma genitalium and Mycoplasma pneumoniae differ considerably from those of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Most notably, M. pneumoniae is unable to express a functional RecU Holliday junction (HJ) resolvase. In addition, the RuvB homologues from both M. pneumoniae and M. genitalium only exhibit DNA helicase activity but not HJ branch migration activity in vitro. To identify a putative role of the RuvA homologues of these mycoplasmas in DNA recombination, both proteins (RuvA(Mpn) and RuvA(Mge), respectively) were studied for their ability to bind DNA and to interact with RuvB and RecU. In spite of a high level of sequence conservation between RuvA(Mpn) and RuvA(Mge) (68.8% identity), substantial differences were found between these proteins in their activities. First, RuvA(Mge) was found to preferentially bind to HJs, whereas RuvA(Mpn) displayed similar affinities for both HJs and single-stranded DNA. Second, while RuvA(Mpn) is able to form two distinct complexes with HJs, RuvA(Mge) only produced a single HJ complex. Third, RuvA(Mge) stimulated the DNA helicase and ATPase activities of RuvB(Mge), whereas RuvA(Mpn) did not augment RuvB activity. Finally, while both RuvA(Mge) and RecU(Mge) efficiently bind to HJs, they did not compete with each other for HJ binding, but formed stable complexes with HJs over a wide protein concentration range. This interaction, however, resulted in inhibition of the HJ resolution activity of RecU(Mge).     

Novel properties of the Thermus thermophilus RuvB protein, which promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions

Branch migration of Holliday junctions, which are central DNA intermediates in homologous recombination, is promoted by the RuvA-RuvB protein complex, and the junctions are resolved by the action of the RuvC protein in Escherichia coli. We report here the cloning of the ruvB gene from a thermophilic eubacterium, Thermus thermophilus HB8 (Tth), and the biochemical characterization of the gene product expressed in E. coli. The Tth ruvB gene could not complement the UV sensitivity of an E. coli ruvB deletion mutant and made the wild-type strain more sensitive to UV. In contrast to E. coli RuvB, whose ATPase activity is strongly enhanced by supercoiled DNA but only weakly enhanced by linear duplex DNA, the ATPase activity of Tth RuvB was efficiently and equally enhanced by supercoiled and linear duplex DNA. Tth RuvB hydrolyzed a broader range of nucleoside triphosphates than E. coli RuvB. In addition, Tth RuvB, in the absence of RuvA protein, promoted branch migration of a synthetic Holliday junction at 60° C in an ATP-dependent manner. The protein, as judged by its ATPase activity, required ATP for thermostability. Since a RuvA protein has not yet been identified in T. thermophilus, we used E. coli RuvA to examine the effects of RuvA on the activities of Tth RuvB. E. coli RuvA greatly enhanced the ability of Tth RuvB to hydrolyze ATP in the presence of DNA and to promote branch migration of a synthetic Holliday junction at 37° C. These results indicate the conservation of the RuvA-RuvB interaction in different bacterial species, and suggest the existence of a ruvA homolog in T. thermophilus. Although GTP and dGTP were efficiently hydrolyzed by Tth RuvB, these nucleoside triphosphates could not be utilized for branch migration in vitro, implying that the conformational change in RuvB brought about by ATP hydrolysis, which is necessary for driving the Holliday junction branch migration, cannot be accomplished by the hydrolysis of these nucleoside triphosphates. Received: 26 November 1998 / Accepted: 19 April 1999     

Processing of recombination intermediates by the RecG and RuvAB proteins of Escherichia coli.

The RuvAB, RuvC and RecG proteins of Escherichia coli process intermediates in recombination and DNA repair into mature products. RuvAB and RecG catalyse branch migration of Holliday junctions, while RuvC resolves these structures by nuclease cleavage around the point of strand exchange. The overlap between RuvAB and RecG was investigated using synthetic X- and Y-junctions. RuvAB is a complex of RuvA and RuvB, with RuvA providing the DNA binding subunit and RuvB the ATPase activity that drives branch migration. Both RuvA and RecG form defined complexes with each of the junctions. The gel mobilities of these complexes suggests that the X-junction attracts two tetramers of RuvA, but mainly monomers of RecG. Dissociation of the junction in the presence of ATP requires high levels of RuvAB. RecG is shown to have a much higher specific activity to the extent that very little of this protein would be required to match RuvAB in vivo. Both proteins also dissociate a Y-junction, which is consistent with helicase activity. However, RecG shows no ability to unwind more conventional substrates and the suggestion is made that its helicase activity is directed towards specific DNA structures such as junctions.     

The role of RuvA octamerization for RuvAB function in vitro and in vivo

RuvA plays an essential role in branch migration of the Holliday junction by RuvAB as part of the RuvABC pathway for processing Holliday junctions in Escherichia coli. Two types of RuvA-Holliday junction complexes have been characterized: 1) complex I containing a single RuvA tetramer and 2) complex II in which the junction is sandwiched between two RuvA tetramers. The functional differences between the two forms are still not clear. To investigate the role of RuvA octamerization, we introduced three amino acid substitutions designed to disrupt the E. coli RuvA tetramer-tetramer interface as identified by structural studies. The mutant RuvA was tetrameric and interacted with both RuvB and junction DNA but, as predicted, formed complex I only at protein concentrations up to 500 nm. We present biochemical and surface plasmon resonance evidence for functional and physical interactions of the mutant RuvA with RuvB and RuvC on synthetic junctions. The mutant RuvA with RuvB showed DNA helicase activity and could support branch migration of synthetic four-way and three-way junctions. However, junction binding and the efficiency of branch migration of four-way junctions were affected. The activity of the RuvA mutant was consistent with a RuvAB complex driven by one RuvB hexamer only and lead us to propose that one RuvA tetramer can only support the activity of one RuvB hexamer. Significantly, the mutant failed to complement the UV sensitivity of E. coli DeltaruvA cells. These results indicate strongly that RuvA octamerization is essential for the full biological activity of RuvABC.     

Novel properties of the Thermus thermophilus RuvB protein, which promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions

Branch migration of Holliday junctions, which are central DNA intermediates in homologous recombination, is promoted by the RuvA-RuvB protein complex, and the junctions are resolved by the action of the RuvC protein in Escherichia coli. We report here the cloning of the ruvB gene from a thermophilic eubacterium, Thermus thermophilus HB8 (Tth), and the biochemical characterization of the gene product expressed in E. coli. The Tth ruvB gene could not complement the UV sensitivity of an E. coli ruvB deletion mutant and made the wild-type strain more sensitive to UV. In contrast to E. coli RuvB, whose ATPase activity is strongly enhanced by supercoiled DNA but only weakly enhanced by linear duplex DNA, the ATPase activity of Tth RuvB was efficiently and equally enhanced by supercoiled and linear duplex DNA. Tth RuvB hydrolyzed a broader range of nucleoside triphosphates than E. coli RuvB. In addition, Tth RuvB, in the absence of RuvA protein, promoted branch migration of a synthetic Holliday junction at 60°?C in an ATP-dependent manner. The protein, as judged by its ATPase activity, required ATP for thermostability. Since a RuvA protein has not yet been identified in T. thermophilus, we used E. coli RuvA to examine the effects of RuvA on the activities of Tth RuvB. E. coli RuvA greatly enhanced the ability of Tth RuvB to hydrolyze ATP in the presence of DNA and to promote branch migration of a synthetic Holliday junction at 37°?C. These results indicate the conservation of the RuvA-RuvB interaction in different bacterial species, and suggest the existence of a ruvA homolog in T. thermophilus. Although GTP and dGTP were efficiently hydrolyzed by Tth RuvB, these nucleoside triphosphates could not be utilized for branch migration in vitro, implying that the conformational change in RuvB brought about by ATP hydrolysis, which is necessary for driving the Holliday junction branch migration, cannot be accomplished by the hydrolysis of these nucleoside triphosphates.     

Electron microscopic single particle analysis of a tetrameric RuvA/RuvB/Holliday junction DNA complex

During the late stage of homologous recombination in prokaryotes, RuvA binds to the Holliday junction intermediate and executes branch migration in association with RuvB. The RuvA subunits form two distinct complexes with the Holliday junction: complex I with the single RuvA tetramer on one side of the four way junction DNA, and complex II with two tetramers on both sides. To investigate the functional roles of complexes I and II, we mutated two residues of RuvA (L125D and E126K) to prevent octamer formation. An electron microscopic analysis indicated that the mutant RuvA/RuvB/Holliday junction DNA complex formed the characteristic tripartite structure, with only one RuvA tetramer bound to one side of the Holliday junction, demonstrating the unexpected stability of this complex. The novel bent images of the complex revealed an intriguing morphological similarity to the structure of SV40 large T antigen, which belongs to the same AAA+ family as RuvB.     

ATP-dependent branch migration of Holliday junctions promoted by the RuvA and RuvB proteins of E. coli.

The RuvA and RuvB proteins of E. coli, which are induced as part of the cellular response to DNA damage, act together to promote the branch migration of Holliday junctions. Addition of purified RuvA and RuvB to a RecA-mediated recombination reaction stimulates the rate of strand exchange and the formation of hetero-duplex DNA. Stimulation does not occur via interaction with RecA; instead, RuvA and RuvB act directly upon recombination intermediates (Holliday junctions) made by RecA. We show that RuvAB-mediated branch migration requires ATP and can bypass UV-induced DNA lesions. At high RuvB concentrations, the requirement for RuvA is overcome, indicating that the RuvB ATPase provides the motor force for branch migration. RuvA protein provides specificity by binding to the Holliday junction, thereby reducing the requirement for RuvB by 50-fold. The newly discovered biochemical properties of RuvA, RuvB, and RuvC are incorporated into a model for the postreplicational repair of DNA following UV irradiation.     

Characterisation of RuvAB-Holliday junction complexes by glycerol gradient sedimentation.

The Escherichia coli RuvA and RuvB proteins interact specifically with Holliday junctions to promote ATP-dependent branch migration during genetic recombination and DNA repair. In the work described here, glycerol gradient centrifugation was used to investigate the requirements for the formation of pre-branch migration complexes. Since gradient centrifugation provides a simple and gentle method to analyse relatively unstable protein-DNA complexes, we were able to detect RuvA- and RuvAB-Holliday junction complexes without the need for chemical fixation. Using 35S-labelled RuvA protein and 3H-labelled Holliday junctions, we show that RuvA acts as a helicase accessory factor that loads the RuvB helicase onto the Holliday junction by structure-specific interactions. The resulting complex contained both RuvA and RuvB, as detected by Western blotting using serum raised against RuvA and RuvB. The stoichiometry of binding was estimated to be approximately four RuvA tetramers per junction. Formation of the RuvAB-Holliday junction complex required the presence of divalent metal ions and occurred without the need for ATP. However, the stability of the complex was enhanced by the presence of ATP gamma S, a non-hydrolysable ATP analogue. The data support a model for branch migration in which structure-specific binding of Holliday junctions by RuvA targets the assembly of hexameric RuvB rings on DNA. Specific loading of the RuvB ring helicase by RuvA is likely to be the initial step towards ATP-dependent branch migration.     

Formation of a stable RuvA protein double tetramer is required for efficient branch migration in vitro and for replication fork reversal in vivo

In bacteria, RuvABC is required for the resolution of Holliday junctions (HJ) made during homologous recombination. The RuvAB complex catalyzes HJ branch migration and replication fork reversal (RFR). During RFR, a stalled fork is reversed to form a HJ adjacent to a DNA double strand end, a reaction that requires RuvAB in certain Escherichia coli replication mutants. The exact structure of active RuvAB complexes remains elusive as it is still unknown whether one or two tetramers of RuvA support RuvB during branch migration and during RFR. We designed an E. coli RuvA mutant, RuvA2(KaP), specifically impaired for RuvA tetramer-tetramer interactions. As expected, the mutant protein is impaired for complex II (two tetramers) formation on HJs, although the binding efficiency of complex I (a single tetramer) is as wild type. We show that although RuvA complex II formation is required for efficient HJ branch migration in vitro, RuvA2(KaP) is fully active for homologous recombination in vivo. RuvA2(KaP) is also deficient at forming complex II on synthetic replication forks, and the binding affinity of RuvA2(KaP) for forks is decreased compared with wild type. Accordingly, RuvA2(KaP) is inefficient at processing forks in vitro and in vivo. These data indicate that RuvA2(KaP) is a separation-of-function mutant, capable of homologous recombination but impaired for RFR. RuvA2(KaP) is defective for stimulation of RuvB activity and stability of HJ·RuvA·RuvB tripartite complexes. This work demonstrates that the need for RuvA tetramer-tetramer interactions for full RuvAB activity in vitro causes specifically an RFR defect in vivo.     

Modulation of RuvB function by the mobile domain III of the Holliday junction recognition protein RuvA

In prokaryotes, RuvA-RuvB complexes play a crucial role in the migration of the Holliday junction, which is a key intermediate of homologous recombination. RuvA binds to the Holliday junction and enhances the ATPase activity of RuvB required for branch migration. RuvA adopts a unique domain structure, which assembles into a tetrameric molecule. The previous mutational and proteolytic analyses suggested that mutations in a carboxyl-terminal domain (domain III) impair binding of RuvA to RuvB. In order to clarify the functional role of each domain in vitro, we established the recombinant expression systems, which allow us to analyze structural and biochemical properties of each domain separately. A small-angle X-ray scattering solution study, combined with X-ray crystallographic analyses, was applied to the tetrameric full-length RuvA and its tetrameric NH2 region (domains I and II) lacking the domain III. These results demonstrated that domain III can be completely separate from the tetrameric major core of the NH2 region and freely mobile in solution, through a remarkably flexible loop. Biochemical analyses indicated that domain III not only interacts with RuvB, but also modulates its ATPase activity. This modulation may facilitate the dynamic coupling between RuvA and RuvB during branch migration.     

Interaction of Branch Migration Translocases with the Holliday Junction-resolving Enzyme and Their Implications in Holliday Junction Resolution

Double-strand break repair involves the formation of Holliday junction (HJ) structures that need to be resolved to promote correct replication and chromosomal segregation. The molecular mechanisms of HJ branch migration and/or resolution are poorly characterized in Firmicutes. Genetic evidence suggested that the absence of the RuvAB branch migration translocase and the RecU HJ resolvase is synthetically lethal in Bacillus subtilis, whereas a recU recG mutant was viable. In vitro RecU, which is restricted to bacteria of the Firmicutes phylum, binds HJs with high affinity. In this work we found that RecU does not bind simultaneously with RecG to a HJ. RuvB by interacting with RecU bound to the central region of HJ DNA, loses its nonspecific association with DNA, and re-localizes with RecU to form a ternary complex. RecU cannot stimulate the ATPase or branch migration activity of RuvB. The presence of RuvB·ATPγS greatly stimulates RecU-mediated HJ resolution, but the addition of ATP or RuvA abolishes this stimulatory effect. A RecU·HJ·RuvAB complex might be formed. RecU does not increase the RuvAB activities but slightly inhibits them.     

Escherichia coli RuvBL268S: a mutant RuvB protein that exhibits wild-type activities in vitro but confers a UV-sensitive ruv phenotype in vivo.

The RuvABC proteins of Escherichia coli process recombination intermediates during genetic recombination and DNA repair. RuvA and RuvB promote branch migration of Holliday junctions, a process that extends heteroduplex DNA. Together with RuvC, they form a RuvABC complex capable of Holliday junction resolution. Branch migration by RuvAB is mediated by RuvB, a hexameric ring protein that acts as an ATP-driven molecular pump. To gain insight into the mechanism of branch migration, random mutations were introduced into the ruvB gene by PCR and a collection of mutant alleles were obtained. Mutation of leucine 268 to serine resulted in a severe UV-sensitive phenotype, characteristic of a ruv defect. Here, we report a biochemical analysis of the mutant protein RuvBL268S. Unexpectedly, the purified protein is fully active in vitro with regard to its ATPase, DNA binding and DNA unwinding activities. It also promotes efficient branch migration in combination with RuvA, and forms functional RuvABC-Holliday junction resolvase complexes. These results indicate that RuvB may perform some additional, and as yet undefined, function that is necessary for cell survival after UV-irradiation.     

RuvA is a sliding collar that protects Holliday junctions from unwinding while promoting branch migration

The RuvAB proteins catalyze branch migration of Holliday junctions during DNA recombination in Escherichia coli. RuvA binds tightly to the Holliday junction, and then recruits two RuvB pumps to power branch migration. Previous investigations have studied RuvA in conjunction with its cellular partner RuvB. The replication fork helicase DnaB catalyzes branch migration like RuvB but, unlike RuvB, is not dependent on RuvA for activity. In this study, we specifically analyze the function of RuvA by studying RuvA in conjunction with DnaB, a DNA pump that does not work with RuvA in the cell. Thus, we use DnaB as a tool to dissect RuvA function from RuvB. We find that RuvA does not inhibit DnaB-catalyzed branch migration of a homologous junction, even at high concentrations of RuvA. Hence, specific protein-protein interaction is not required for RuvA mobilization during branch migration, in contrast to previous proposals. However, low concentrations of RuvA block DnaB unwinding at a Holliday junction. RuvA even blocks DnaB-catalyzed unwinding when two DnaB rings are acting in concert on opposite sides of the junction. These findings indicate that RuvA is intrinsically mobile at a Holliday junction when the DNA is undergoing branch migration, but RuvA is immobile at the same junction during DNA unwinding. We present evidence that suggests that RuvA can slide along a Holliday junction structure during DnaB-catalyzed branch migration, but not during unwinding. Thus, RuvA may act as a sliding collar at Holliday junctions, promoting DNA branch migration activity while blocking other DNA remodeling activities. Finally, we show that RuvA is less mobile at a heterologous junction compared to a homologous junction, as two opposing DnaB pumps are required to mobilize RuvA over heterologous DNA.     

Biological roles of the Escherichia coli RuvA, RuvB and RuvC proteins revealed

In Escherichia coli, the ruvA, ruvB and ruvC gene products are required for genetic recombination and the recombinational repair of DNA damage. New studies suggest that these three proteins function late in recombination and process Holliday junctions made by RecA protein-mediated strand exchange. In vitro, RuvA protein binds a Holliday junction with high affinity and, together with RuvB (an ATPase), promotes ATP-dependent branch migration of the junction leading to the formation of heteroduplex DNA. The third protein, RuvC, which acts independently of RuvA and RuvB, resolves recombination intermediates by specific endonucleolytic cleavage of the Holliday junction.     

Purification and properties of the RuvA and RuvB proteins of Escherichia coli

Summary The RuvA and RuvB proteins of Escherichia coli play important roles in the post-replicational repair of damaged DNA, genetic recombination and cell division. In this paper, we describe the construction of over expression vectors for RuvA and RuvB and detail simple purification schemes for each protein. The purified 22 kDa RuvA polypeptide forms a tetrameric protein (M_r ca. 100000) as observed by gel filtration. The tetramer is stabilised by strong disulphide bridges that resist denaturation during SDS-PAGE (in the absence of boiling and -mercaptoethanol). In contrast, purified RuvB polypeptides (37 kDa) weakly associate to form a dimeric protein (M_r ca. 85000). At low protein concentrations, the RuvB dimer dissociates into monomers. The multimeric forms of each protein may be covalently linked by the bifunctional cross-linking reagent dimethyl suberimidate. Addition of purified RuvA and RuvB to a RecA-mediated recombination reaction was found to stimulate the rate of strand exchange leading to the rapid formation of heteroduplex DNA.     

Two different oligomeric states of the RuvB branch migration motor protein as revealed by electron microscopy

In prokaryotes, the RuvA, B, and C proteins play major roles at the late stage of DNA homologous recombination, where RuvB complexed with RuvA acts as an ATP-dependent motor for branch migration. The oligomeric structures of negatively stained and frozen hydrated RuvB from Thermus thermophilus HB8 were investigated by electron microscopy. RuvB oligomers free of DNA formed a ring structure of about 14 nm in diameter. The averaged top view image clearly indicated a sevenfold symmetry, suggesting that it exists as a heptamer. The RuvB oligomers complexed with duplex DNA formed a smaller ring of about 13 nm in diameter. The averaged top view images represented a sixfold symmetry. This difference in oligomerization indicates that the oligomeric structure of RuvB may convert from a heptamer to a hexamer upon DNA binding. In addition, this finding provides the lesson that great care should be taken in investigating the subunit organizations of DNA binding proteins, because their oligomeric states are more sensitive to DNA interactions than expected.     

Identification and characterization of Thermus thermophilus HB8 RuvA protein, the subunit of the RuvAB protein complex that promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions

The Escherichia coli ruvA and ruvB genes constitute an SOS-regulated operon. The products of these genes form a protein complex that promotes branch migration of the Holliday junction, an intermediate of homologous recombination. RuvA protein binds specifically to the Holliday junction and recruits RuvB protein to the junction. RuvB is an ATP-driven motor protein involved in branch migration. We previously cloned the ruvB gene of the thermophilic bacterium Thermus thermophilus HB8 (Tth) and found that, in contrast to the operon structure in most mesothermic bacteria, the ruvA gene is absent from the vicinity of ruvB. In this work, we cloned the ruvA gene from T. thermophilus HB8 and analyzed its nucleotide sequence. Tth RuvA is a protein of 20,414 Da consisting of 191 amino acid residues, and is 37% identical in amino acid sequence to E. coli RuvA. Tth ruvA complemented the DNA repair defect of E. coli deltaruvA mutants. The purified Tth RuvA protein stimulated Tth RuvB activities, such as hydrolysis of ATP and promotion of branch migration of the Holliday junction, in a manner similar to the RuvA-RuvB interactions observed in E. coli. In addition, Tth RuvA stimulated the E. coli RuvB activities in vitro, which was well consistent with the results of in vivo hetero-complementation experiments.