Macromolecular regulators have matching effects on the phase equilibrium and interfacial tension of biomolecular condensates

The interfacial tension of phase‐separated biomolecular condensates affects their fusion and multiphase organization, and yet how this important property depends on the composition and interactions of the constituent macromolecules is poorly understood. Here we use molecular dynamics simulations to determine the interfacial tension and phase equilibrium of model condensate‐forming systems. The model systems consist of binary mixtures of Lennard‐Jones particles or chains of such particles. We refer to the two components as drivers and regulators; the former has stronger self‐interactions and hence a higher critical temperature (T _c) for phase separation. In previous work, we have shown that, depending on the relative strengths of driver‐regulator and driver‐driver interactions, regulators can either promote or suppress phase separation (i.e., increase or decrease T _c). Here we find that the effects of regulators on T _c quantitatively match the effects on interfacial tension (γ). This important finding means that, when a condensate‐forming system experiences a change in macromolecular composition or a change in intermolecular interactions (e.g., by mutation or posttranslational modification, or by variation in solvent conditions such as temperature, pH, or salt), the resulting change in T _c can be used to predict the change in γ and vice versa. We also report initial results showing that disparity in intermolecular interactions drives multiphase coexistence. These findings provide much needed guidance for understanding how biomolecular condensates mediate cellular functions.     

Regulation of biomolecular condensate dynamics by signaling

Biomolecular condensates are mesoscopic biomolecular assemblies devoid of long range order that contribute to important cellular functions. They form reversibly, are stabilized by numerous but relatively weak intermolecular interactions, and their formation can be regulated by various cellular signals including changes in local concentration, post-translational modifications, energy-consuming processes, and biomolecular interactions. Condensates formed by liquid–liquid phase separation are initially liquid but are metastable relative to hydrogels or irreversible solids that have been associated with protein aggregation diseases and are stabilized by stronger, more permanent interactions. As a consequence of this, a series of cellular mechanisms are available to regulate not only biomolecular condensation but also the physical properties of the condensates.     

Biomolecular phase separation through the lens of sodium‐23 NMR

Phase separation is a fundamental physicochemical process underlying the spatial arrangement and coordination of cellular events. Detailed characterization of biomolecular phase separation requires experimental access to the internal environment of dilute and especially condensed phases at high resolution. In this study, we take advantage from the ubiquitous presence of sodium ions in biomolecular samples and present the potentials of ²³Na NMR as a proxy to report the internal fluidity of biomolecular condensed phases. After establishing the temperature and viscosity dependence of ²³Na NMR relaxation rates and translational diffusion coefficient, we demonstrate that ²³Na NMR probes of rotational and translational mobility of sodium ions are capable of capturing the increasing levels of confinement in agarose gels in dependence of agarose concentration. The ²³Na NMR approach is then applied to a gel‐forming phenylalanine‐glycine (FG)‐containing peptide, part of the nuclear pore complex involved in controlling the traffic between cytoplasm and cell nucleus. It is shown that the ²³Na NMR together with the ¹⁷O NMR provide a detailed picture of the sodium ion and water mobility within the interior of the FG peptide hydrogel. As another example, we study phase separation in water‐triethylamine (TEA) mixture and provide evidence for the presence of multiple microscopic environments within the TEA‐rich phase. Our results highlight the potentials of ²³Na NMR in combination with ¹⁷O NMR in studying biological phase separation, in particular with regards to the molecular properties of biomolecular condensates and their regulation through various physico‐ and biochemical factors.     

Regulation of the activity of the bacterial histidine kinase PleC by the scaffolding protein PodJ

Scaffolding proteins can customize the response of signaling networks to support cell development and behaviors. PleC is a bifunctional histidine kinase whose signaling activity coordinates asymmetric cell division to yield a motile swarmer cell and a stalked cell in the gram-negative bacterium Caulobacter crescentus. Past studies have shown that PleC’s switch in activity from kinase to phosphatase correlates with a change in its subcellular localization pattern from diffuse to localized at the new cell pole. Here we investigated how the bacterial scaffolding protein PodJ regulates the subcellular positioning and activity of PleC. We reconstituted the PleC-PodJ signaling complex through both heterologous expressions in Escherichia coli and in vitro studies. In vitro, PodJ phase separates as a biomolecular condensate that recruits PleC and inhibits its kinase activity. We also constructed an in vivo PleC-CcaS chimeric histidine kinase reporter assay and demonstrated using this method that PodJ leverages its intrinsically disordered region to bind to PleC’s PAS sensory domain and regulate PleC-CcaS signaling. Regulation of the PleC-CcaS was most robust when PodJ was concentrated at the cell poles and was dependent on the allosteric coupling between PleC-CcaS’s PAS sensory domain and its downstream histidine kinase domain. In conclusion, our in vitro biochemical studies suggest that PodJ phase separation may be coupled to changes in PleC enzymatic function. We propose that this coupling of phase separation and allosteric regulation may be a generalizable phenomenon among enzymes associated with biomolecular condensates.     

Phase Separation in Biology and Disease; Current Perspectives and Open Questions

In the past almost 15 years, we witnessed the birth of a new scientific field focused on the existence, formation, biological functions, and disease associations of membraneless bodies in cells, now referred to as biomolecular condensates. Pioneering studies from several laboratories [reviewed in1, 2, 3] supported a model wherein biomolecular condensates associated with diverse biological processes form through the process of phase separation. These and other findings that followed have revolutionized our understanding of how biomolecules are organized in space and time within cells to perform myriad biological functions, including cell fate determination, signal transduction, endocytosis, regulation of gene expression and protein translation, and regulation of RNA metabolism. Further, condensates formed through aberrant phase transitions have been associated with numerous human diseases, prominently including neurodegeneration and cancer. While in some cases, rigorous evidence supports links between formation of biomolecular condensates through phase separation and biological functions, in many others such links are less robustly supported, which has led to rightful scrutiny of the generality of the roles of phase separation in biology and disease.4, 5, 6, 7 During a week-long workshop in March 2022 at the Telluride Science Research Center (TSRC) in Telluride, Colorado, ～25 scientists addressed key questions surrounding the biomolecular condensates field. Herein, we present insights gained through these discussions, addressing topics including, roles of condensates in diverse biological processes and systems, and normal and disease cell states, their applications to synthetic biology, and the potential for therapeutically targeting biomolecular condensates.     

Assembly of Mitotic Structures through Phase Separation

Cells compartmentalize biochemical reactions using organelles, which can be membrane enclosed or built entirely of proteins and ribonucleic acids. Recent studies indicate that many organelles that lack membranes have liquid-like properties, including the ability to flow, fuse, and undergo rapid internal rearrangement. The assembly of these “biomolecular condensates” has been described as liquid–liquid phase separation, whereby their constituent components demix from the cytoplasm, similar to water separating from oil. Other studies suggest that protein phase separation followed by maturation, where intramolecular connections strengthen over time, can lead to gel- or glass-like states. This review discusses how the principles of phase separation might help to understand the assembly and behavior of organelles that operate in mitosis, when the cell assembles the mitotic spindle to segregate chromosomes. Special attention is given to the mitotic pericentriolar material of centrosomes and the spindle matrix.     

Metals and inorganic molecules in regulating protein and nucleic acid phase separation

The realization that liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) underlies the formation of membraneless compartments in cells has motivated efforts to modulate the condensation process of biomolecules. Increasing evidence shows that metals and inorganic molecules abundantly distributed in cells play important roles in the regulation of biomolecular condensation. Herein, we briefly reviewed the background of biomacromolecular phase separation and summarized the recent research progress on the roles of metals and inorganic molecules in regulating protein and nucleic acid phase separation in vitro and in cells.     

Towards sequence-based principles for protein phase separation predictions

The phenomenon of protein phase separation, which underlies the formation of biomolecular condensates, has been associated with numerous cellular functions. Recent studies indicate that the amino acid sequences of most proteins may harbour not only the code for folding into the native state but also for condensing into the liquid-like droplet state and the solid-like amyloid state. Here we review the current understanding of the principles for sequence-based methods for predicting the propensity of proteins for phase separation. A guiding concept is that entropic contributions are generally more important to stabilise the droplet state than they are for the native and amyloid states. Although estimating these entropic contributions has proven difficult, we describe some progress that has been recently made in this direction. To conclude, we discuss the challenges ahead to extend sequence-based prediction methods of protein phase separation to include quantitative in vivo characterisations of this process.     

Biomolecular condensates in autophagy regulation

Autophagy is an intracellular degradation system that contributes to cellular homeostasis. Autophagosome formation is a landmark event in autophagy, which sequesters and delivers cytoplasmic components to the lysosome for degradation. Based on selectivity, autophagy can be classified into bulk and selective autophagy, which are mechanistically distinct from each other, especially in the requirement of cargos for autophagosome formation. Recent studies revealed that liquid-like biomolecular condensates, which are formed through liquid–liquid phase separation, regulate the autophagosome formation of both bulk and selective autophagy. Here, we focus on recent findings on the involvement of biomolecular condensates in autophagy regulation and discuss their significance.     

Biochemical Timekeeping Via Reentrant Phase Transitions

Appreciation for the role of liquid–liquid phase separation in the functional organization of cellular matter has exploded in recent years. More recently there has been a growing effort to understand the principles of heterotypic phase separation, the demixing of multiple proteins and nucleic acids into a single functional condensate. A phase transition is termed reentrant if it involves the transformation of a system from one state into a macroscopically similar or identical state via at least two phase transitions elicited by variation of a single parameter. Reentrant liquid–liquid phase separation can occur when the condensation of one species is tuned by another. Reentrant phase transitions have been modeled in vitro using protein and RNA mixtures. These biochemical studies reveal two features of reentrant phase separation that are likely important to functional cellular condensates: (1) the ability to generate condensates with layered functional topologies, and (2) the ability to generate condensates whose composition and duration are self-limiting to enable a form of biochemical timekeeping. We relate these biochemical studies to potential cellular examples and discuss how layered topologies and self-regulation may impact key biological processes.     

生物大分子相分离在植物中的研究进展

细胞中存在种类繁多的无膜细胞器,在感知环境信号,基因表达调控,RNA加工等过程中发挥了重要的作用,而生物大分子相分离被证明是无膜细胞器形成的主要方式。文章介绍了生物大分子相分离的概念与特征,总结了有关相分离在植物对环境信号响应中的研究进展,并对相分离在植物中的生物学功能进行了分类,以期解析相分离在植物生长发育和逆境适应中的作用机理,揭示植物无膜细胞器的本质与功能。     

Aggregation,Phase Separation and Spatial Morphologies of the Assemblies of FG Nucleoporins

Nuclear pore complex (NPC) is a biomolecular “nanomachine” that controls nucleocytoplasmic transport in eukaryotic cells. The key component of the functional architecture of the NPC is the assembly of intrinsically disordered proteins that line its passageway and play a central role in the NPC transport mechanism. Due to paucity of experimental methods capable to directly probe the morphology of this assembly in intact NPCs, much of our knowledge about its properties derives from in vitro experiments augmented by theoretical and computational modeling. I review the major insights into the biophysics of the assemblies of the intrinsically disordered proteins of the NPC arising from the theoretical analysis of the recent in vitro experimental results, with the emphasis on the phase separation and aggregation phenomena.     

Rich Phase Separation Behavior of Biomolecules

Phase separation is a thermodynamic process leading to the formation of compositionally distinct phases. For the past few years, numerous works have shown that biomolecular phase separation serves as biogenesis mechanisms of diverse intracellular condensates, and aberrant phase transitions are associated with disease states such as neurodegenerative diseases and cancers. Condensates exhibit rich phase behaviors including multiphase internal structuring, noise buffering, and compositional tunability. Recent studies have begun to uncover how a network of intermolecular interactions can give rise to various biophysical features of condensates. Here, we review phase behaviors of biomolecules, particularly with regard to regular solution models of binary and ternary mixtures. We discuss how these theoretical frameworks explain many aspects of the assembly, composition, and miscibility of diverse biomolecular phases, and highlight how a model-based approach can help elucidate the detailed thermodynamic principle for multicomponent intracellular phase separation.     

Controlling Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of Cold-Adapted Crystallin Proteins from the Antarctic Toothfish

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins is important to a variety of biological processes both functional and deleterious, including the formation of membraneless organelles, molecular condensations that sequester or release molecules in response to stimuli, and the early stages of disease-related protein aggregation. In the protein-rich, crowded environment of the eye lens, LLPS manifests as cold cataract. We characterize the LLPS behavior of six structural γ-crystallins from the eye lens of the Antarctic toothfish Dissostichus mawsoni, whose intact lenses resist cold cataract in subzero waters. Phase separation of these proteins is not strongly correlated with thermal stability, aggregation propensity, or cross-species chaperone protection from heat denaturation. Instead, LLPS is driven by protein–protein interactions involving charged residues. The critical temperature of the phase transition can be tuned over a wide temperature range by selective substitution of surface residues, suggesting general principles for controlling this phenomenon, even in compactly folded proteins.     

Challenges in studying the liquid-to-solid phase transitions of proteins using computer simulations

“Membraneless organelles,” also referred to as biomolecular condensates, perform a variety of cellular functions and their dysregulation is implicated in cancer and neurodegeneration. In the last two decades, liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of intrinsically disordered and multidomain proteins has emerged as a plausible mechanism underlying the formation of various biomolecular condensates. Further, the occurrence of liquid-to-solid transitions within liquid-like condensates may give rise to amyloid structures, implying a biophysical link between phase separation and protein aggregation. Despite significant advances, uncovering the microscopic details of liquid-to-solid phase transitions using experiments remains a considerable challenge and presents an exciting opportunity for the development of computational models which provide valuable, complementary insights into the underlying phenomenon. In this review, we first highlight recent biophysical studies which provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying liquid-to-solid (fibril) phase transitions of folded, disordered and multi-domain proteins. Next, we summarize the range of computational models used to study protein aggregation and phase separation. Finally, we discuss recent computational approaches which attempt to capture the underlying physics of liquid-to-solid transitions along with their merits and shortcomings.     

Biophysical studies of phase separation integrating experimental and computational methods

Biomolecular phase separation that contributes to the formation of membraneless organelles and biomolecular condensates has recently gained tremendous attention because of the importance of these assemblies in physiology, disease, and engineering applications. Understanding and directing biomolecular phase separation requires a multiscale view of the biophysical properties of these phases. Yet, many classic tools to characterize biomolecular properties do not apply in these condensed phases. Here, we discuss insights obtained from spectroscopic methods, in particular nuclear magnetic resonance and optical spectroscopy, in understanding the molecular and atomic interactions that underlie the formation of protein-rich condensates. We also review approaches closely coupling nuclear magnetic resonance data with computational methods especially coarse-grained and all-atom molecular simulations, which provide insight into molecular features of phase separation. Finally, we point to future methodolical developments, particularly visualizing biophysical properties of condensates in cells.     

Low membrane fluidity triggers lipid phase separation and protein segregation in living bacteria

All living organisms adapt their membrane lipid composition in response to changes in their environment or diet. These conserved membrane‐adaptive processes have been studied extensively. However, key concepts of membrane biology linked to regulation of lipid composition including homeoviscous adaptation maintaining stable levels of membrane fluidity, and gel‐fluid phase separation resulting in domain formation, heavily rely upon in vitro studies with model membranes or lipid extracts. Using the bacterial model organisms Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, we now show that inadequate in vivo membrane fluidity interferes with essential complex cellular processes including cytokinesis, envelope expansion, chromosome replication/segregation and maintenance of membrane potential. Furthermore, we demonstrate that very low membrane fluidity is indeed capable of triggering large‐scale lipid phase separation and protein segregation in intact, protein‐crowded membranes of living cells; a process that coincides with the minimal level of fluidity capable of supporting growth. Importantly, the in vivo lipid phase separation is not associated with a breakdown of the membrane diffusion barrier function, thus explaining why the phase separation process induced by low fluidity is biologically reversible.