CircHIPK3 sponges miR‐558 to suppress heparanase expression in bladder cancer cells

Correction to: EMBO Reports (2017) 18(9): 1646–1659. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201643581 ¦ Published online 9 August 2017The authors contacted the journal after being alerted to issues in the figures. The authors state that while preparing the figures, images were mislabelled leading to partial duplications in two figure panels. The authors requested to withdraw the affected panels and to replace them with correct representative images that had been generated at the time of the original experimentation. The panels listed below are therefore withdrawn and replaced. The related source data are published with this note.Figure 4DThe transwell assay image for UMUC3 cells showing invasion behaviour upon miR‐558 mimic treatment (“miR‐558”) had been incorrect. An image showing the invasion behaviour of UMUC3 cells upon depletion of circHIPK3 (“si‐circHIPK3#1”) showing the same cells as depicted in Fig 2H was erroneously used. A representative image of the correct data is now displayed in the paper.Figure 4EThe transwell assay image for UMUC3 cells showing migration behaviour upon treatment with an miR‐588 anti‐miR (“anti‐miR‐558”) had been incorrect. An image showing the migration behaviour of UMUC3 cells upon circHIPK3 overexpression (“circHIPK3”) showing the same cells as those depicted in Fig 2D was erroneously used. A representative image of the correct data is now displayed in the paper.Figure 5CThe Western blot image showing the β‐actin loading control for T24T cells had been incorrect. A representative image of the correct data is now displayed in the paper.Figure 5FThe image for UMUC3 cells showing tube formation upon treatment with a control mimic and overexpression of circHIPK3 “mimicNC+circHIPK3” had been incorrect. A representative image of the correct data is now displayed in the paper.The figure issues described above are herewith corrected. The authors state that the errors do not affect the results or conclusions of the study and apologize for any confusion these errors may have caused. Figure 4D. Original. Figure 4D. Corrected. Figure 4E. Original. Figure 4E. Corrected. Figure 5C. Original. Figure 5C. Corrected. Figure 5F. Original. Figure 5F. Corrected.      

Inactive variants of death receptor p75NTR reduce Alzheimer’s neuropathology by interfering with APP internalization

Correction to: The EMBO Journal (2021) 40: e104450. DOI 10.15252/embj.2020104450 | Published online 1 December 2020The authors correct Figure 6A of this paper. During the revision process, images from p75^NTR‐expressing mice were inadvertently used in place of p75^NTR knock‐out neurons. The corrected figure, showing lack of p75^NTR labeling in knock‐out neurons, along with their corresponding internalized APP, is shown here. This error only concerns the images used to illustrate the quantitative data. It does not affect the analysis itself nor the conclusions derived from it. The authors apologize for this oversight and agree with this corrigendum; no response could be obtained from KT. Figure 6A. Original Figure 6A. Corrected     

Cytosolic GDH1 degradation restricts protein synthesis to sustain tumor cell survival following amino acid deprivation

Correction to: The EMBO Journal (2021) 40: e107480. DOI 10.15252/embj.2020107480 ¦ Published online 6 July 2021The authorship of this research paper is herewith corrected to indicate that Jialiang Shao, Tiezhu Shi, Hua Yu, and Yufeng Ding are all equal co‐first authors.     

Caspase‐12 and endoplasmic reticulum stress mediate neurotoxicity of pathological prion protein

Correction to: The EMBO Journal (2003) 22: 5435–5445. DOI 10.1093/emboj/cdg537 ¦ Published online 15 October 2003 Figure 7A. Original.Source data are available online for this figure. Figure 7A. Corrected. Source data are available online for this figure. The journal was informed of potential image aberrations in Fig 7A. The authors claim that the loading control in the originally published figure corresponded to a replicate experiment as many Western blots were run in parallel with the same samples to measure levels of ER stress markers. The control panel in Fig 7A is herewith retracted and replaced with the author‐supplied loading control of the experiment shown in Fig 7A.The journal noted that Fig 3 and Appendix Figure 3 were duplicated and that the legend to Appendix Figure 3 did not match the displayed figure. The authors recovered the quantification data for Appendix Figure 3, but not the scanned blots. The authors state that they no longer have access to the laboratory books or primary data and that they cannot definitively say which image was analysed. The authors withdraw Appendix Figure 3.The authors also acknowledge that there are undeclared splice sites in Fig 3, but that they could not locate the source data.The source data for Fig 7A are available with this corrigendum notice.The authors apologize for these errors and agree with this corrigendum; no response could be obtained from MR‐C.     

BH3‐only proteins are part of a regulatory network that control the sustained signalling of the unfolded protein response sensor IRE1α

Correction to: The EMBO Journal (2012) 31: 2322–2335. DOI 10.1038/emboj.2012.84 ¦ Published online 17 April 2012 Figure 4A. Original.Source data are available online for this figure. Figure 4A. Corrected. Source data are available online for this figure. The journal was alerted to the claim that the IRE input panels are identical in Figure 1G. Since the IRE input panels show a high degree of similarity, the source data for both panels are published with this notice for the avoidance of doubt.The HSP90 blot looks very similar in Fig 3F and Fig S4A. The authors confirmed that they had stripped and re‐probed the original HSP90 blot in Fig 3F and Fig S4A. Specifically, the membrane was probed with antibodies to IRE1, and HSP90, and then re‐probed with anti‐PERK antibodies. For that reason, HSP90 was presented in both figures because it is the same experiment. In the source data published with this correction, the authors have marked the original data with contrast boxes and arrows to indicate which blots were presented in the figure. The legends have been updated to state that a control originating from one blot is displayed in both figures.The authors acknowledge that they had removed one set of experimental conditions with wild‐type parental DKO cells when preparing Fig 4A and state that this does not change the conclusions of the figure. The figure is herewith updated with a demarcating line and source data for the full experiment is published with this notice.All authors agree with this corrigendum. The authors apologize for any confusion caused by these errors.     

Posttranscriptional regulation of colonic epithelial repair by RNA binding protein IMP1/IGF2BP1

Correction to: EMBO Reports (2019) 20: e47074. DOI 10.15252/embr.201847074 | Published online 6 May 2019The authors noticed that the control and disease labels had been inverted in their data analysis resulting in publication of incorrect data in Figure 1C. The corrected figure is displayed below. This change affects the conclusions as detailed below. The authors apologize for this error and any confusion it may have caused.In the legend of 1C, change from, “Differential gene expression analysis of pediatric ileal CD patient samples (n = 180) shows increased (> 4‐fold) IMP1 expression as compared to non‐inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pediatric samples (n = 43)”.Open in a separate windowFigure 1CCorrected Open in a separate windowFigure 1COriginal To, "Differential gene expression analysis of pediatric ileal CD patient samples (n = 180) shows decreased (> 4‐fold) IMP1 expression as compared to non‐inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pediatric samples (n = 43)”.In abstract, change from, “Here, we report increased IMP1 expression in patients with Crohn''s disease and ulcerative colitis”.To, “Here, we report increased IMP1 expression in adult patients with Crohn''s disease and ulcerative colitis”.In results, change from, “Consistent with these findings, analysis of published the Pediatric RISK Stratification Study (RISK) cohort of RNA‐sequencing data 38 from pediatric patients with Crohn''s disease (CD) patients revealed that IMP1 is upregulated significantly compared to control patients and that this effect is specific to IMP1 (i.e., other distinct isoforms, IMP2 and IMP3, are not changed; Fig 1C)”.To, “Contrary to our findings in colon tissue from adults, analysis of published RNA‐sequencing data from the Pediatric RISK Stratification Study (RISK) cohort of ileal tissue from children with Crohn’s disease (CD) 38 revealed that IMP1 is downregulated significantly compared to control patients in the RISK cohort and that this effect is specific to IMP1 (i.e., other distinct isoforms, IMP2 and IMP3, are not changed; Fig 1C)”.In discussion, change from, “Indeed, we report that IMP1 is upregulated in patients with Crohn''s disease and ulcerative colitis and that mice with Imp1 loss exhibit enhanced repair following DSS‐mediated damage”.To “Indeed, we report that IMP1 is upregulated in adult patients with Crohn''s disease and ulcerative colitis and that mice with Imp1 loss exhibit enhanced repair following DSS‐mediated damage”.     

Molecular basis of cross‐species ACE2 interactions with SARS‐CoV‐2‐like viruses of pangolin origin

Correction to: The EMBO Journal (2021) 40: e107786. DOI 10.15252/embj.2021107786 | Published online 8 June 2021The authors would like to add three references to the paper: Starr et al and Zahradník et al also reported that the Q498H or Q498R mutation has enhanced binding affinity to ACE2; and Liu et al reported on the binding of bat coronavirus to ACE2.Starr et al and Zahradník et al have now been cited in the Discussion section, and the following sentence has been corrected from:“According to our data, the SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD with Q498H increases the binding strength to hACE2 by 5‐fold, suggesting the Q498H mutant is more ready to interact with human receptor than the wildtype and highlighting the necessity for more strict control of virus and virus‐infected animals”.to“Here, according to our data and two recently published papers, the SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD with Q498H or Q498R increases the binding strength to hACE2 (Starr et al, 2020; Zahradník et al, 2021), suggesting the mutant with Q498H or Q498R is more ready to interact with human receptor than the wild type and highlighting the necessity for more strict control of virus and virus‐infected animals”.The Liu et al citation has been added to the following sentence:“In another paper published by our group recently, RaTG13 RBD was found to bind to hACE2 with much lower binding affinity than SARS‐CoV‐2 though RaTG13 displays the highest whole‐genome sequence identity (96.2%) with the SARS‐CoV‐2 (Liu et al, 2021)”.Additionally, the authors have added the GISAID accession IDs to the sequence names of the SARS‐CoV‐2 in two human samples (Discussion section). To make identification unambiguous, the sequence names have been updated from “SA‐lsf‐27 and SA‐lsf‐37” to “GISAID accession ID: EPI_ISL_672581 and EPI_ISL_672589”.Lastly, the authors declare in the Materials and Methods section that all experiments employed SARS‐CoV‐2 pseudovirus in cultured cells. These experiments were performed in a BSL‐2‐level laboratory and approved by Science and Technology Conditions Platform Office, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.These changes are herewith incorporated into the paper.     

Structural basis of transport and inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum transporter PfFNT

In “Structural basis of transport and inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum transporter PfFNT” by Lyu et al (2021), the authors depict the inhibitor MMV007839 in its hemiketal form in Fig 3A and F, Fig 4C, and Appendix Figs S10A, B and S13. We note that Golldack et al (2017) reported that the linear vinylogous acid tautomer of MMV007839 constitutes the binding and inhibitory entity of PfFNT. The authors are currently obtaining higher resolution cryo‐EM structural data of MMV007839‐bound PfFNT to ascertain which of the interconvertible isoforms is bound and the paper will be updated accordingly.     

Structural basis of transport and inhibition of the Plasmodium falciparum transporter PfFNT

Subject Categories: Membranes & Trafficking, Microbiology, Virology & Host Pathogen Interaction, Structural Biology

We recently reported the first structures of the Plasmodium falciparum transporter PfFNT, both in the absence and presence of the inhibitor MMV007839 (Lyu et al, 2021). These structures indicated that PfFNT assembles as a pentamer. The bound MMV007839 was found in the middle of the elongated channel formed by each PfFNT protomer, adjacent to residue G107. MMV007839 exists in two tautomeric forms and can adopt either a cyclic hemiketal‐like structure or a linear vinylogous acid conformation (Fig ​(Fig3A).3A). Unfortunately, these two tautomeric forms could not be clearly distinguished based on the existing cryo‐EM data at 2.78 Å resolution. The bound MMV007839 inhibitor was reported as the cyclic hemiketal‐like form in the structure in Figs ​Figs3A3A and ​andF,F, and ​and4C,4C, Appendix Figs S10A and B, and S13 and in the online synopsis image.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Cryo‐EM structure of the PfFNT‐MMV007839 complex

1. Chemical structure of MMV007839. The compound can either be in cyclic hemiketal‐like or linear vinylogous acid tautomeric forms.
2. Cryo‐EM density map of pentameric PfFNT viewed from the parasite’s cytoplasm. Densities of the five bound MMV007839 within the pentamer are colored red. The five protomers of pentameric PfFNT are colored yellow, slate, orange, purple, and gray.
3. Ribbon diagram of the 2.18‐Å resolution structure of pentameric PfFNT‐MMV007839 viewed from the parasite’s cytoplasm. The five protomers of pentameric PfFNT are colored yellow, slate, orange, purple, and gray.
4. Ribbon diagram of pentameric PfFNT‐MMV007839 viewed from the extracellular side of the parasite. The five protomers of pentameric PfFNT are colored yellow, slate, orange, purple, and gray.
5. Ribbon diagram of pentameric PfFNT‐MMV007839 viewed from the parasite’s membrane plane. The five protomers of pentameric PfFNT are colored yellow, slate, orange, purple, and gray. Densities of the five bound MMV007839 are depicted as red meshes.
6. The MMV007839‐binding site of PfFNT. The bound MMV007839 is colored green. Density of the bound MMV007839 is depicted as black mesh. Residues involved in forming the inhibitor binding site are colored yellow. The hydrogen bonds are highlighted with black dotted lines.

Open in a separate windowFigure 4Structure of the central channel in the PfFNT‐MMV007839 protomer

• CA cartoon of the central channel formed within a PfFNT protomer. The channel contains one constriction site in this conformational state. Residues forming the constriction and the K35‐D103‐N108 and K177‐E229‐N234 triads are illustrated as sticks. Residues F94, I97, and L104, which form the first constriction site in the apo‐PfFNT structure, are also included in the figure.

Eric Beitz alerted us to the findings reported by his group that the linear vinylogous acid tautomer of MMV007839 constitutes the binding and inhibitory entity of PfFNT (Golldack et al, 2017).     

Exercise‐induced α‐ketoglutaric acid stimulates muscle hypertrophy and fat loss through OXGR1‐dependent adrenal activation

The authors approached the journal to correct a mistake in the data presented in Appendix␣Fig S3D. The authors state that the mouse images in Appendix␣Fig S3D mistakenly displayed images from Fig 2F and Appendix␣Fig S1F. The images in Appendix␣Fig S3D are herewith corrected. The authors state that this change does not affect the conclusions or the statistics. The source data for these panels have been added to the original publication.The authors note that the following sentence needs to be corrected from: Appendix Figure S3D. Original. Appendix Figure S3D. Corrected. “Interestingly, several well‐established accumulation signatures of succinate, malate, hypoxanthine, and xanthine induced by endurance exercise (Lewis et␣al, 2010) were found to be decreased by endurance exercise (Figs 1D and EV1A–D)”.to“Interestingly, several well‐established accumulation signatures of succinate, malate, hypoxanthine, and xanthine induced by endurance exercise (Lewis et␣al, 2010) were found to be decreased by resistance exercise (Figs 1D and EV1A–D)”.Further, the authors requested to amend the legend of Appendix␣Fig S3R to indicate that the same sample for the iWAT group, “WT+2%AKG” treatment, is shown in Fig 3P. The corrected legend reads: “(R‐S). Representative images (R) and quantification (S) of p‐HSL DAB staining from male OXGR1OE^AG mice treated with AKG for 12 weeks (n = 6 per group). The same sample is shown as in Fig 3P ”.The authors regret these errors and any confusion they may have caused. All authors approve of this correction.     

Experts in science communication: A shift from neutral encyclopedia to equal participant in dialogue

Even if the predominant model of science communication with the public is now based on dialogue, many experts still adhere to the outdated deficit model of informing the public. Subject Categories: Genetics, Gene Therapy & Genetic Disease, S&S: History & Philosophy of Science, S&S: Ethics

During the past decades, public communication of science has undergone profound changes: from policy‐driven to policy‐informing, from promoting science to interpreting science, and from dissemination to interaction (Burgess, 2014). These shifts in communication paradigms have an impact on what is expected from scientists who engage in public communication: they should be seen as fellow citizens rather than experts whose task is to increase scientific literacy of the lay public. Many scientists engage in science communication, because they see this as their responsibility toward society (Loroño‐Leturiondo & Davies, 2018). Yet, a significant proportion of researchers still “view public engagement as an activity of talking to rather than with the public” (Hamlyn et al, 2015). The highly criticized “deficit model” that sees the role of experts as educating the public to mitigate skepticism still persists (Simis et al, 2016; Suldovsky, 2016).Indeed, a survey we conducted among experts in training seems to corroborate the persistence of the deficit model even among younger scientists. Based on these results and our own experience with organizing public dialogues about human germline gene editing (Box 1), we discuss the implications of this outdated science communication model and an alternative model of public engagement, that aims to align science with the needs and values of the public.Box 1

The DNA‐dialogue project

The Dutch DNA‐dialogue project invited citizens to discuss and form opinions about human germline gene editing. During 2019 and 2020, this project organized twenty‐seven dialogues with professionals, such as embryologists and midwives, and various lay audiences. Different scenarios of a world in 2039 (https://www.rathenau.nl/en/making‐perfect‐lives/discussing‐modification‐heritable‐dna‐embryos) served as the starting point. Participants expressed their initial reactions to these scenarios with emotion‐cards and thereby explored the values they themselves and other participants deemed important as they elaborated further. Starting each dialogue in this way provides a context that enables everyone to participate in dialogue about complex topics such as human germline gene editing and demonstrates that scientific knowledge should not be a prerequisite to participate.An important example of “different” relevant knowledge surfaced during a dialogue with children between 8 and 12 years in the Sophia Children’s Hospital in Rotterdam (Fig 1). Most adults in the DNA‐dialogues accepted human germline gene modification for severe genetic diseases, as they wished the best possible care and outcome for their children. The children at Sophia, however, stated that they would find it terrible if their parents had altered something about them before they had been born; their parents would not even have known them. Some children went so far to say they would no longer be themselves without their genetic condition, and that their condition had also given them experiences they would rather not have missed.Open in a separate windowFigure 1 Children participating in a DNA‐dialogue meeting. Photographed by Levien Willemse.     

Syncytia formation by SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected cells

In the supporting information of the article, the authors noticed that there was an error in Movie EV1. The right panel (SARS‐CoV‐2 + IFITM1) showed the same PI channel data (red) as the middle panel (SARS‐CoV‐2). This mistake occurred during the assembly of the merged movie file and does not change the interpretation of the data. A corrected version of the movie is herewith updated.     

PDBsum1 : A standalone program for generating PDBsum analyses

PDBsum1 is a standalone set of programs to perform the same structural analyses as provided by the PDBsum web server (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbsum). The server has pages for every entry in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and can also process user‐uploaded PDB files, returning a password‐protected set of pages that are retained for around 3 months. The standalone version described here allows for in‐house processing and indefinite retention of the results. All data files and images are pre‐generated, rather than on‐the‐fly as in the web version, so can be easily accessed. The program runs on Linux, Windows, and mac operating systems and is freely available for academic use at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/software/PDBsum1.     

Clinical translation of mesenchymal stromal cell extracellular vesicles: Considerations on scientific rationale and production requisites

The present paper is a commentary to ‘Identification and characterization of hADSC‐derived exosome proteins from different isolation methods’ (Huang et al. 2021; 10.1111/jcmm.16775). Given the enthusiasm for the potential of mesenchymal stromal cell‐derived extracellular vesicles (MSC‐EVs), some considerations deserve attention as they move through successive stages of research and application into humans. We herein remark the prerequisite of generating that evidence ensuring a high consistency in safety, composition and biological activity of the intended MSC‐EV preparations, and the suitability of disparate isolation techniques to produce efficacious EV preparations and fulfil requirements for standardized clinical‐grade biomanufacturing.     

Involving society in science: Reflections on meaningful and impactful stakeholder engagement in fundamental research

Open Science calls for transparent science and involvement of various stakeholders. Here are examples of and advice for meaningful stakeholder engagement. Subject Categories: Economics, Law & Politics, History & Philosophy of Science

The concepts of Open Science and Responsible Research and Innovation call for a more transparent and collaborative science, and more participation of citizens. The way to achieve this is through cooperation with different actors or “stakeholders”: individuals or organizations who can contribute to, or benefit from research, regardless of whether they are researchers themselves or not. Examples include funding agencies, citizens associations, patients, and policy makers (https://aquas.gencat.cat/web/.content/minisite/aquas/publicacions/2018/how_measure_engagement_research_saris1_aquas2018.pdf). Such cooperation is even more relevant in the current, challenging times—even apart from a global pandemic—when pseudo‐science, fake news, nihilist attitudes, and ideologies too often threaten social and technological progress enabled by science. Stakeholder engagement in research can inform and empower citizens, help render research more socially acceptable, and enable policies grounded on evidence‐based knowledge. Beyond, stakeholder engagement is also beneficial to researchers and to research itself. In a recent survey, the majority of scientists reported benefits from public engagement (Burns et al, 2021). This can include increased mutual trust and mutual learning, improved social relevance of research, and improved adoption of results and knowledge (Cottrell et al, 2014). Finally, stakeholder engagement is often regarded as an important factor to sustain public investment in the life sciences (Burns et al, 2021).

Stakeholder engagement in research can inform and empower citizens, help render research more socially acceptable and enable policies grounded on evidence‐based knowledge

Here, we discuss different levels of stakeholder engagement by way of example, presenting various activities organized by European research institutions. Based on these experiences, we propose ten reflection points that we believe should be considered by the institutions, the scientists, and the funding agencies to achieve meaningful and impactful stakeholder engagement.