A Developmental Pattern of Flowering in Colored <Emphasis Type="Italic">Zantedeschia</Emphasis> spp.: Effects of Bud Position and Gibberellin

The restricted flowering of colored cultivars ofZantedeschia is a consequence of developmental constraints imposed by apical dominance of the primary bud on secondary buds in the tuber, and by the sympodial growth of individual shoots. GA₃ enhances flowering inZantedeschia by increasing the number of flowering shoots per tuber and inflorescences per shoot. The effects of gibberellin on the pattern of flowering and on the developmental fate of differentiated inflorescences along the tuber axis and individual shoot axes were studied in GA₃ and Uniconazole-treated tubers. Inflorescence primordia and fully developed (emerged) floral stems produced during tuber storage and the plant growth period were recorded. Days to flowering, percent of flowering shoots and floral stem length decreased basipetally along the shoot and tuber axes. GA₃ prolonged the flowering period and increased both the number of flowering shoots per tuber and the differentiated inflorescences per shoot. Activated buds were GA₃ responsive regardless of meristem size or age. Uniconazole did not inhibit inflorescence differentiation but inhibited floral stem elongation. The results suggest that GA₃ has a dual action in the flowering process: induction of inflorescence differentiation and promotion of floral stem elongation. The flowering pattern could be a result of a gradient in the distribution of endogenous factors involved in inflorescence differentialtion (possibly GAs) and in floral stem growth. This gradient along the tuber and shoot axes is probably controlled by apical dominance of the primary bud. Online publication: 7 April 2005     

Auxin–cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching

In many plant species, the intact main shoot apex grows predominantly and axillary bud outgrowth is inhibited. This phenomenon is called apical dominance, and has been analyzed for over 70 years. Decapitation of the shoot apex releases the axillary buds from their dormancy and they begin to grow out. Auxin derived from an intact shoot apex suppresses axillary bud outgrowth, whereas cytokinin induced by decapitation of the shoot apex stimulates axillary bud outgrowth. Here we describe the molecular mechanisms of the interactions between auxin and cytokinin in the control of shoot branching.     

Apical Dominanace in Xanthium strumarium: A DISCUSSION IN RELATION TO CURRENT HYPOTHESES OF CORRELATIVE INHIBITION

The influence of the spectral distribution of illumination onthe gibberellin, cytokinin, auxin, and abscisic acid levelsand the correlation with the degree of branching in Xanthiumstrumarium is presented and discussed. Gibberellins do not appearto play a major role in apical dominance but may be importantfor bud extension following the initial release from dominance.The cytokinin level was much higher in inhibited buds than inreleased buds. It is suggested that the cytokinins present wereprobably not able to participate in bud growth because of anauxin-induced accumulation of abscisic acid in the buds themselves.The concentration of abscisic acid as measured by bioassay andgas-liquid chromatography was between 50 and 250 times thatoccurring in all other plants parts examined. This level felldramatically following release from apical dominance by decapitation.The results are discussed in relation to current hypothesesof apical dominance.     

Cytokinin Function: Increase in [Methyl−14C] Metabolism to Phosphatidylcholine and a Decrease in Oxidation to Carbon Dioxide−14C

Axillary buds of Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Maryland Catterton normally suppressed by apical dominance are released from dormancy with 6-benzylaminopurine. This work was done to determine the change in the [methyl^?14C] metabolism from methionine during bud stimulation with cytokinin. Dormant buds metabolize [methyl^?14C] -methionine to ¹⁴CO₂ more effectively than buds released from dormancy. This oxidation of the methyl group is inhibited with benzylaminopurine. On the other hand, the methylation of polar membrane components, including phosphatidylcholine, is enhanced by the cytokinin during the period preceding the increase in bud weight. The interpretation is presented that the enhanced synthesis of membrane components, as well as the preservation of the methyl groups, are mechanisms for the cytokinin release of bud dormancy with 6-benzylaminopurine.     

Variation in Endogenous Gibberellins,Abscisic Acid,and Carbohydrate Content During the Growth Cycle of Colored <Emphasis Type="Italic">Zantedeschia</Emphasis> spp., a Tuberous Geophyte

Phenologic changes and variation in the level of endogenous gibberellins (GAs), abscisic acid (ABA), carbohydrate content, and α-amylase activity were examined in colored Zantedeschia spp. cv. Cala Gold. These changes were examined in the primary bud tissues and in the attached tuber tissue during the growth cycle. Dormant tubers were dry-stored at 20°C for 3 months, planted in a phytotron, and grown under 22/16 ± 1°C. Plant development was monitored under continued irrigation until leaf senescence and tuber dormancy. GAs and ABA were extracted from the primary bud tissues, fractionated by HPLC, and analyzed using GC-SIM. Starch, glucose, soluble protein, and α-amylase activity were monitored in the tuber tissue attached to the primary bud. Endogenous changes in GAs and ABA in the primary bud were correlated with endogenous changes in carbohydrate content and α-amylase activity in the attached tuber tissue. These correlations were observed during the rest and the growth periods and were associated with developmental changes in the plant, that is, bud dormancy relaxation, bud growth, and inflorescence differentiation. ABA content decreased and a transient pulse of GA was measured in the primary bud concomitantly with the onset of shoot elongation in dry tubers during storage, before planting. The sharp increase of GAs in the bud preceded inflorescence differentiation as observed in dissected apices by about 15 days, as well as the increase in α-amylase activity in the attached tuber tissue. A steep decrease in starch level was measured in the tuber after planting, concomitantly with massive plant growth. These findings suggest a possible involvement of gibberellin in the initiation of α-amylase activity during dormancy relaxation in colored Zantedeschia and in the autonomous induction of flowering.     

Roles for Auxin, Cytokinin, and Strigolactone in Regulating Shoot Branching

Many processes have been described in the control of shoot branching. Apical dominance is defined as the control exerted by the shoot tip on the outgrowth of axillary buds, whereas correlative inhibition includes the suppression of growth by other growing buds or shoots. The level, signaling, and/or flow of the plant hormone auxin in stems and buds is thought to be involved in these processes. In addition, RAMOSUS (RMS) branching genes in pea (Pisum sativum) control the synthesis and perception of a long-distance inhibitory branching signal produced in the stem and roots, a strigolactone or product. Auxin treatment affects the expression of RMS genes, but it is unclear whether the RMS network can regulate branching independently of auxin. Here, we explore whether apical dominance and correlative inhibition show independent or additive effects in rms mutant plants. Bud outgrowth and branch lengths are enhanced in decapitated and stem-girdled rms mutants compared with intact control plants. This may relate to an RMS-independent induction of axillary bud outgrowth by these treatments. Correlative inhibition was also apparent in rms mutant plants, again indicating an RMS-independent component. Treatments giving reductions in RMS1 and RMS5 gene expression, auxin transport, and auxin level in the main stem were not always sufficient to promote bud outgrowth. We suggest that this may relate to a failure to induce the expression of cytokinin biosynthesis genes, which always correlated with bud outgrowth in our treatments. We present a new model that accounts for apical dominance, correlative inhibition, RMS gene action, and auxin and cytokinin and their interactions in controlling the progression of buds through different control points from dormancy to sustained growth.     

Axillary bud flowering after apical decapitation in Pharbitis in relation to photoinduction

The flowering response of axillary buds of seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy, cv. Violet, was examined in relation to the timing of apical bud removal (plumule including the first leaf or second leaf) before or after a flower-inductive 16-h dark period. When the apical bud was removed well before the dark period, flower buds formed on the axillary shoots that subsequently developed, but when removed just before, or after, the dark period, different results were observed depending on the timing of the apical bud removal and plant age. In the case of 8-day-old seedlings, fewer flower buds formed on the axillary shoots developing from the cotyledonary node when plumules were removed 20 to 0 h before the dark period. When the apical bud was removed after the dark period, no flower buds formed. Using 14-day-old seedlings a similar reduction of flowering response was observed on the axillary shoots developing from the first leaf node when the apical bud was removed just after the dark period. To further elucidate the relationship between apical dominance and flowering, kinetin or IAA was applied to axillary buds or the cut site where the apical bud was located. Both chemicals influenced flowering, probably by modulating apical dominance which normally forces axillary buds to be dormant.     

The Effect of the Apical Bud on the Growth of Lateral Buds on Subterranean Shoots

The influence of the apical bud on the growth of the lateral buds on subterranean shoots was studied in Stachys sieboldiiMig. and Helianthus rigidus(Gass.) Desv. Removing and damaging the apical parts of subterranean shoots or their treatment with 2% chlorocholine chloride shoot enhanced shoot branching. The response to light of the apical bud was invariably negative: the stolons, which came out or were extracted from the soil, grew back into the ground (negative phototropism). The response to light of lateral buds was autonomous and depended on the conditions of their initiation. The lateral buds developed in darkness manifested negative phototropism when withdrawn from the soil and exposed to the light, whereas the buds developed in the light showed positive phototropism. The author concludes that the concept of apical dominance, thoroughly studied in aboveground shoots, is also valid for subterranean shoots. However, in contrast to the former, in the latter case, the apical bud does not control the growth orientation of the lateral buds.     

The gravity-regulated growth of axillary buds is mediated by a mechanism different from decapitation-induced release

When the upper part of the main shoot of the Japanese morning glory (Pharbitis nil or Ipomoea nil) is bent down, the axillary bud situated on the uppermost node of the bending region is released from apical dominance and elongates. Here, we demonstrate that this release of axillary buds from apical dominance is gravity regulated. We utilized two agravitropic mutants of morning glory defective in gravisensing cell differentiation, weeping (we) and weeping2 (we2). Bending the main shoots of either we or we2 plants resulted in minimal elongation of their axillary buds. This aberration was genetically linked to the agravitropism phenotype of the mutants, which implied that shoot bending-induced release from apical dominance required gravisensing cells. Previous studies have shown that basipetal translocation of auxin from the apical bud inhibits axillary bud growth, whereas cytokinin promotes axillary bud outgrowth. We therefore compared the roles of auxin and cytokinin in bending- or decapitation-induced axillary bud growth. In the wild-type and we plants, decapitation increased cytokinin levels and reduced auxin response. In contrast, shoot bending did not cause significant changes in either cytokinin level or auxin response, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying gravity- and decapitation-regulated release from apical dominance are distinct and unique.     

Cytokinin/Auxin Control of Apical Dominance in Ipomoea nil

Although the concept of apical dominance control by the ratioof cytokinin to auxin is not new, recent experimentation withtransgenic plants has given this concept renewed attention.In the present study, it has been demonstrated that cytokinintreatments can partially reverse the inhibitory effect of auxinon lateral bud outgrowth in intact shoots of Ipomoea nil. Althoughless conclusive, this also appeared to occur in buds of isolatednodes. Auxin inhibited lateral bud outgrowth when applied eitherto the top of the stump of the decapitated shoot or directlyto the bud itself. However, the fact that cytokinin promotiveeffects on bud outgrowth are known to occur when cytokinin isapplied directly to the bud suggests different transport tissuesand/or sites of action for the two hormones. Cytokinin antagonistswere shown in some experiments to have a synergistic effectwith benzyladenine on the promotion of bud outgrowth. If theratio of cytokinin to auxin does control apical dominance, thenthe next critical question is how do these hormones interactin this correlative process? The hypothesis that shoot-derivedauxin inhibits lateral bud outgrowth indirectly by depletingcytokinin content in the shoots via inhibition of its productionin the roots was not supported in the present study which demonstratedthat the repressibility of lateral bud outgrowth by auxin treatmentsat various positions on the shoot was not correlated with proximityto the roots but rather with proximity to the buds. Resultsalso suggested that auxin in subtending mature leaves as wellas that in the shoot apex and adjacent small leaves may contributeto the apical dominance of a shoot. (Received September 24, 1996; Accepted March 16, 1997)     

Concepts and terminology of apical dominance

Apical dominance is the control exerted by the shoot apex over lateral bud outgrowth. The concepts and terminology associated with apical dominance as used by various plant scientists sometimes differ, which may lead to significant misconceptions. Apical dominance and its release may be divided into four developmental stages: (I) lateral bud formation, (II) imposition of inhibition on lateral bud growth, (III) release of apical dominance following decapitation, and (IV) branch shoot development. Particular emphasis is given to discriminating between Stage III, which is accompanied by initial bud outgrowth during the first few hours of release and may be promoted by cytokinin and inhibited by auxin, and Stage IV, which is accompanied by subsequent bud outgrowth occurring days or weeks after decapitation and which may be promoted by auxin and gibberellin. The importance of not interpreting data measured in Stage IV on the basis of conditions and processes occurring in Stage III is discussed as well as the correlation between degree of branching and endogenous auxin content, branching mutants, the quantification of apical dominance in various species (including Arabidopsis ), and apical control in trees.     

Nauclea diderrichii: rooting of stem cuttings,clonal variation in shoot dominance,and branch plagiotropism

Summary Nauclea diderrichii (De Wild, and Th. Dur.) Merill (Rubiaceae), an indigenous hardwood of West Africa, is increasingly being grown commercially. This study investigates the potential for vegetative propagation and clonal selection, and raises some fundamental questions about the physiology of apical dominance and of plagiotropism. Rooting ability was high, with up to 100% rooting in 2–4 weeks, when different Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) concentrations and leaf areas were tested. Auxin applications greatly increased the numbers of roots per cutting. The decapitation of unbranched plants revealed clonal variation in apical dominance and also in the establishment of outright dominance by the two shoots formed from the outgrowth of the axillary buds of the opposite leaves at the top node. Regression analysis of the Dominance Ratio (length of dominant: length of the sub-dominant shoot at the time of achieving dominance) against overall lateral bud activity (r = 0.82), showed that when the two top shoots co-dominate they provide a more powerful source of Correlative Inhibition than when one of the top shoots dominates the other. The imposition of plagiotropism in the axillary bud occurred over a period of a few days as the terminal and axillary buds emerged from the stipule. Growth of accessory buds on intact plants and debranched cuttings was orthotropic. These results are discussed with regard to the role of the leaf in root formation and the understanding of dominance relationships, branching and crown development in trees.     

Regulation of Branching in Decussate Species with Unequal Lateral Buds

In the decussate plants Alternanthera philoxeroides and Hygrophilasp. the opposite axillary bud primordia are of unequal sizefrom the time of their inception; the larger or + buds lie alongone helix and the smaller or – buds along another (helicoidalsystem). In decapitated plants of Alternanthera both buds grewout, but unequally; if the node was vertically split growthof the two shoots was more equal, and if the + buds were excisedgrowth of the – shoots approximately equalled that ofcontrol + shoots. In decapitated shoots of Hygrophila grownin sterile culture only one bud, the + or larger one, grew outat each of the upper nodes. In excised cultured nodes, also,only the + bud grew out; but if the nodes were split longitudinallyboth buds grew out, initially rather unequally. These experimentssupport the view that the regulation of branching in these specieshas two components, apical dominance and the dominance of thelarger (+) bud over the smaller (–) bud at the same node.The restriction of growth potentiality imposed on the –bud is not permanent but can be modified. Further correlativeeffects on bud outgrowth include those of the subtending leavesand of buds at other nodes.     

The Roles of Auxin in Regulating “Shoot Branching” of Cremastra appendiculata

Cremastra appendiculata (D. Don) Makino is a mainly vegetative propagation terrestrial orchid that is a typical representative of the warm-temperate vegetation in China. In this experiment, we investigated the growth and development process of C. appendiculata leaf buds and examined their biochemical components (proteins, auxin, and cytokinin) to gain insight into the “shoot branching” of C. appendiculata pseudobulb string. The results showed that the metabolic activity of C. appendiculata pseudobulbs became lower with the increase of pseudobulb age. However, biennial and triennial pseudobulbs have higher auxin levels than annual pseudobulbs in the intact plant (P < 0.05). After decapitation, the auxin rapidly reduces in biennials. The reduction of auxin level promotes cytokinin biosynthesis, which makes the biennial dormant buds start to germinate 18 days after decapitation. These data and phenomena suggested that auxin plays important roles in regulating shoot branching of C. appendiculata, although further studies are needed to consolidate this viewpoint. Our data indirectly support the classical apical dominance theory whereby biennial pseudobulbs are strongly dependent on reduced auxin to initiate leaf bud outgrowth.

     

APICAL DOMINANCE AND FORM IN WOODY PLANTS: A REAPPRAISAL

The form of woody plants is commonly interpreted in terms of apical dominance. Trees with the decurrent or deliquescent branching habit are said to have weak apical dominance, whereas excurrent branching is associated with strong apical dominance. A close examination of many decurrent species such as the oaks, hickories, and maples reveals that almost all of the lateral buds on the current year's twigs are completely inhibited. This complete inhibition of lateral buds by definition and common usage of the term is an expression of strong apical dominance. In trees possessing the excurrent branching habit, such as most conifers and some angiosperms, many of the lateral buds on the current year's twigs elongate to varying degrees. This is usually interpreted as an expression of weak apical dominance. The relationship between bud inhibition and form in woody perennials is much more complex than bud inhibition in herbaceous plants because of the time sequence in the formation and release of lateral buds. For example, it is only after a period of rest or dormancy in the decurrent forms that one or more of the uppermost lateral buds are released, and these may outgrow the currently elongating terminal shoot resulting in forking. Conversely, in the excurrent forms, it seems that the initial expression of weak apical dominance enables the terminal leader to outgrow the currently elongating lateral branches so that it exerts complete control over their subsequent growth and development in later years. An examination of the levels of diffusible auxin at different points along the twigs of excurrent and decurrent species indicates that the balance of growth factors at any given locus, and not the absolute quantity of auxin, exerts primary control over bud inhibition and shoot elongation.     

Apical dominance

Apical dominance is the control exerted by the apical portions of the shoot over the outgrowth of the lateral buds. The classical explanations for correlative inhibition have focused on hormone/nutrient hypotheses. The remarkable progress that has been made in the technology of endogenous hormone quantification in plant tissue has not been accompanied by comparable progress in the elucidation of mechanisms of hormone action in apical dominance. Evidence from hormonal studies suggests that apically produced auxin indirectly suppresses axillary bud outgrowth that is promoted by cytokinin originating from roots/shoots. Significant involvement with other hormones, although less likely, has not been ruled out. Possible changes in tissue sensitivity to hormones should not be overlooked. Auxin-induced oligosaccharide signals originating from the cell walls of shoot tips or polyamines may function as secondary inhibitors to bud growth. Alternatively, apically produced auxin may suppress lateral bud growth by inhibiting auxin export from these buds. Support for a critical role for nutrients in apical dominance keeps resurfacing, especially for auxin-directed nutrient transport and for water as a possible inducing signal for bud outgrowth. Histological and biochemical analyses of lateral buds recently released from apical dominance are urgently needed. The feasibility of manipulating endogenous auxin/cytokinin content in plant tissue by gene insertion and modulation opens the door to exciting approaches as does the use of hormone insensitive/resistant mutants. There is also need to recognize the existence of variability of apical dominance mechanisms among different plant types. The aesthetic and economic implications of understanding apical dominance for the modification of plant structure and form are extremely significant.     

In vitro flowering of Boronia megastigma Nees. and the effect of 6-benzylaminopurine

Successful flower bud initiation and development was achieved on Boronia megastigma in vitro. The effect of cytokinin on flowering was investigated in environmental conditions that promote flowering as well as under conditions that stimulate vegetative growth (nonfloral promotory conditions). Flower initiation and differentiation was enhanced by cytokinin; however, many flower buds reverted when the media contained high levels of cytokinin. Anthesis occurred only on media that had no cytokinin added and under floral promotory conditions.     

Relationship between reproductive behavior and new shoot development in 5-year-old branches of olive trees (Olea europaea L.)

The development of new shoots plays a central role in the complex interactions determining vegetative and reproductive growth in woody plants. To explore this role we evaluated the new shoots in the olive tree, Olea europaea L., and the effect of fruiting on new shoot growth and subsequent flowering. Five-year-old branches served as canopy subunits in order to obtain a global, whole-tree view of new shoot number, size and morphological origin. The non-bearing trees had many more shoots than the fruit-bearing trees, and a greater number of longer shoots. In both bearing conditions, however, the majority of shoots were less than 4 cm long, with shoots of progressively longer lengths present in successively decreasing frequencies. Six major shoot types were defined on the basis of apical or lateral bud origin and of parent shoot age. On fruit-bearing trees, the new shoots originated predominantly from the shoot apex, while on non-fruiting trees, they formed mainly from axillary buds, but in both cases, they tended to develop on younger parent shoots. The previous bearing condition of the tree was the main determinant for subsequent inflorescence development, which was independent of both shoot type and length. Thus, reproductive behavior strongly affected both the amount and type of new branching, but subsequent flowering level was more influenced by previous bearing than by the potential flowering sites on new shoots.     

Participation of gibberellin in the control of apical dominance in soybean and redwood

Summary Loss of apical dominance in soybeans and redwood was increased when the plants were treated with the growth retardant AMO-1618. Simultaneous application of gibberellin reduced the number of elongating buds and promoted growth of the first or second uppermost axillary bud, thus restoring apical dominance. It is concluded that gibberellin participates in the expression of apical dominance.     

Cytokinin Profiles in the Conifer Tree <Emphasis Type="Italic">Abies nordmanniana</Emphasis>: Whole-Plant Relations in Year-Round Perspective

Conifer trees are routinely manipulated hormonally to increase flowering, branching, or adjust crown shape for production purposes. This survey of internal cytokinin levels provides a background for such treatments in Abies nordmanniana, a tree of great economic interest. Reference points in the crown and root system were sampled destructively in 4- and 6-year-old trees and analyzed for a range of cytokinins by LC-MS/MS. No seasonal patterns were detected in the root samples, and a major portion of cytokinin was in conjugated forms. Dramatic and consistent seasonal changes occurred in the crown, at levels 17–65 times higher than in the root. Predominant among crown cytokinins was ZR, except in the needles where IPR was also prominent. Within the crown, cytokinin profiles in different organs differed consistently. The leader bud showed a pronounced mid-June minimum, and a maximum later in summer. Subapical buds showed the same June minimum but peaked in mid autumn at a much lower level. Maxima in these buds were preceded by peaks in the subapical stem. Parallel patterns were observed in homologous tissues on branches.This pattern is consistent with two surges beginning in the uppermost stem tissues leading to subsequent accumulation or stimulated production within the buds. Strong differential hormonal profiles between adjacent buds with different fates agree with recent evidence of localized cytokinin production. The data suggest a reduced role of root-derived cytokinins in crown development. Practical cytokinin treatments for crown-shape regulation require close attention to dosage as well as precise timing and positioning.