Activation of early phase of adipogenesis through Krüppel-like factor KLF9-mediated,enhanced expression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β in 3T3-L1 cells

In this study, we found that Krüppel-like factor (KLF) 9 activate the progression of the early phase of adipocyte differentiation in mouse adipocytic 3T3-L1 cells. KLF9 mRNA was detected in preadipocytes; and its level increased after the initiation of adipocyte differentiation, reached its maximum at 1 h, and gradually decreased thereafter. Functional suppression of KLF9 mRNA by its siRNAs repressed the accumulation of the intracellular lipids with a reduction in the expression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) β, but not in that of C/EBPδ. In contrast, C/EBPβ and C/EBPδ did not affect the expression of KLF9 in 3T3-L1 cells. A chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that KLF9 bound the KLF binding element at position − 874 of the mouse C/EBPβ promoter. Moreover, the ability of KLF9 to bind to this element was enhanced, with a peak at 1–2 h after the initiation of adipogenesis, whose profile well resembled that of the expression of the C/EBPβ gene in 3T3-L1 cells. These results indicate that KLF9 activated the early phase of adipogenesis by enhancing the expression of the C/EBPβ gene in 3T3-L1 cells.     

Brahma is required for proper expression of the floral repressor FLC in Arabidopsis

Background

BRAHMA (BRM) is a member of a family of ATPases of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes from Arabidopsis. BRM has been previously shown to be crucial for vegetative and reproductive development.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here we carry out a detailed analysis of the flowering phenotype of brm mutant plants which reveals that, in addition to repressing the flowering promoting genes CONSTANS (CO), FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1 (SOC1), BRM also represses expression of the general flowering repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC). Thus, in brm mutant plants FLC expression is elevated, and FLC chromatin exhibits increased levels of histone H3 lysine 4 tri-methylation and decreased levels of H3 lysine 27 tri-methylation, indicating that BRM imposes a repressive chromatin configuration at the FLC locus. However, brm mutants display a normal vernalization response, indicating that BRM is not involved in vernalization-mediated FLC repression. Analysis of double mutants suggests that BRM is partially redundant with the autonomous pathway. Analysis of genetic interactions between BRM and the histone H2A.Z deposition machinery demonstrates that brm mutations overcome a requirement of H2A.Z for FLC activation suggesting that in the absence of BRM, a constitutively open chromatin conformation renders H2A.Z dispensable.

Conclusions/Significance

BRM is critical for phase transition in Arabidopsis. Thus, BRM represses expression of the flowering promoting genes CO, FT and SOC1 and of the flowering repressor FLC. Our results indicate that BRM controls expression of FLC by creating a repressive chromatin configuration of the locus.     

Inhibition of LPS‐induced C/EBPδ by trichostatin a has a positive effect on LPS‐induced cyclooxygenase 2 expression in RAW264.7 cells

Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX‐2) is an important inflammatory factor. Previous studies have indicated that COX‐2 is induced with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment. Here, we found that an inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC), trichostatin A (TSA), cannot repress LPS‐induced COX‐2 but it increased the COX‐2 level in RAW264.7 cells. We found no significant difference in NF‐κB activation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, but LPS‐induced C/EBPδ expression was completely abolished after TSA treatment of LPS‐treated cells. Interesting, reporter assay of C/EBPδ promoter revealed that Sp1‐binding site is important. Although there was no alteration in c‐Jun levels, but the phosphorylation of c‐Jun at its C‐terminus was increased dramatically. A DNA‐associated protein assay (DAPA) and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP) indicated that c‐Jun was recruited via Sp1 to the promoter of C/EBPδ after LPS treatment; this recruitment of c‐Jun was repressed by TSA. C/EBPδ inhibition by TSA resulted in increased binding of C/EBPα and C/EBPβ to the COX‐2 promoter. Therefore, TSA has a positive effect on LPS‐induced COX‐2 since it decreases the C/EBPδ level by reducing c‐Jun recruitment by Sp1 to the C/EBPδ promoter, resulting in increased the recruitment of C/EBPα and C/EBPβ to the COX‐2 promoter. J. Cell. Biochem. 110: 1430–1438, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.