老年瓣膜病患者瓣膜置换术术后死亡原因分析

目的:分析老年瓣膜病在瓣膜置换术后的死亡原因,为降低术后死亡率提供科学依据。方法:回顾分析我院以瓣膜置换术治疗的329例老年瓣膜病变患者的资料,对比分析生存患者和死亡患者之间的差异,总结瓣膜置换术后患者死亡的危险因素。结果:心脏瓣膜置换术后死亡率8.51%,单因素分析发现年龄、心功能分级、置换瓣膜数、LAD、LVEF、LVEDD、CPB时间、主动脉阻断时间、置换瓣膜数目与术后死亡有关联(P0.05),Logistic回归分析发现高龄、心功能差、LVEED、CPB为死亡独立危险因素(P0.05)。结论:高龄、心功能差、LVEED过度增大、CPB过长均是瓣膜置换术后的老年瓣膜病患者死亡的独立危险因素,建议临床在诊治中加以警惕。     

CROSS-SECTIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN VEGETATIVE AORTIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS

M-mode echocardiograms of two patients with bacterial endocarditis of approximately 4 months' duration showed dense echoes in the area of the aortic valve. In one patient, who had no prior abnormal cardiac findings, the echoes were clearly suggestive of valvular vegetations. The second patient, however, was known to have had aortic valve disease and a systolic murmur for more than a decade; therefore, dense echoes arising from the aortic valve also could have resulted from valvular calcification. In both patients, cross-sectional echocardiography provided important information. In the first patient, retrograde cardiac catheterization was prevented by large and highly mobile masses attached to the aortic cusps that prolapsed into the left ventricular outflow tract during diastole. Aortic valve replacement without further hemodynamic evaluation was recommended. In the second patient, whose blood cultures remained negative after the acute phase of his illness had been treated, cross-sectional echocardiography showed large vegetations on the aortic valve. Intraoperative findings confirmed the echocardiographic interpretation in each case.     

Cardiac valve replacement in elderly patients.

Cardiac valve replacement in 65 consecutive elderly patients (aged 65 years and older) revealed that the indications for cardiac valve replacement in the elderly should be the same as those in the general population. These 65 patients represented 16% of the patients undergoing valve replacement. The mortality in the first 30 days after operation was 4.6% in the elderly group, compared with 0.9% in the group under 65 years of age. There were 26 significant but nonfatal early complications in the elderly patients, but their long-term functional status was excellent, most of the survivors ending up in either class I or class II of the New York Heart Association functional classification. The late mortality was 3.9% per patient year for aortic valve replacement and 15.1% for mitral with or without aortic valve replacement. The actuarial survival rates were 88% at 24 months and 55% at 54 months for the total elderly group, 86% at 36 months for those with aortic valve replacement, 85% at 24 months and 64% at 36 months for those with mitral valve replacement, 90% at 24 months and 77% at 42 months for the men, and 82% at 24 months and 68% at 42 months for the women. Aortic valve replacement was more common in the elderly than in the younger group because of the higher prevalence of congenital calcific aortic stenosis in the former, and this operation provided more gratifying results than mitral valve replacement in the elderly patients.     

Book Reviews

The findings in and experiences with 19 consecutive patients subjected to open mitral valve surgery are described. All patients underwent a right-heart catheterization. In order to exclude multivalvular heart disease, a left-heart catheterization was performed in 10 patients and angiographic studies of the aortic valve area in 12. Pulmonary function studies were performed on 11 patients. The FEV (0.75 sec.) and the MMFR were found to correlate well with existing pulmonary reserves.Fourteen of the 19 patients subjected to open mitral valve surgery survived the operation and have been followed up for three months to 2½ years. Four patients had a mitral valvuloplasty. Three of these four have deteriorated and will require a valvular replacement. Ten of 15 patients subjected to a mitral valve replacement are alive; five of these 10 have had signs and symptoms indicating peripheral embolization. Mitral valvuloplasty is preferable to a valvular replacement as far as embolic complications are concerned, while valvular replacements result in a more perfect and lasting hemodynamic repair. The high incidence of peripheral embolization following valvular replacements focuses attention on the need for improved mitral valve prostheses.     

The evolution of an ideal stent design and its impact on the aortic endothelium during and after percutaneous replacement

Vascular support structures are important devices for treating valve stenosis. A large population of patients is treated for valvular disease and the preferred mode of treatment is percutaneous valve replacement. Stent devices are proving to be an improved technology in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. This new technology provides highly effective results at minimal cost and with a short duration of hospitalisation. Stents as a supporting structure for tissue valves have evolved over the years into remarkably useful and effective devices. During this process, a number of specific designs have come and gone, and a few have remained. Many design changes were successful, and many were not. This article describes the merits and demerits of various stent designs and details the specific reasons why a particular novel design is expected to be the most suitable implant during and after percutaneous aortic valve replacement.     

Balloon dilatation of the aortic valve for inoperable aortic stenosis.

The place of balloon dilatation of the aortic valve in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis is controversial. Thirty two patients (mean age 76) in whom valve replacement was contraindicated were followed up for three to 24 months (mean 8); 25 were in functional class III or IV according to the New York Heart Association''s classification. Major complications of the procedure occurred in four patients. Echocardiography and Doppler studies were performed before operation and before discharge in 28 patients, and the area of the valve was measured again six to 50 (mean 23) weeks after operation in 11 patients. The peak to peak aortic pressure gradient fell from a mean of 65 (SD 24) to 46 (20) mm Hg, but the area of the aortic valve, measured by Doppler echocardiography, in 18 patients showed a modest but significant increase, from 0.61 (0.16) to 0.74 (0.23) cm2. One month after dilatation, 29 patients were alive, of whom 17 had improved symptoms. Only two had lasting clinical benefit. Sixteen patients died, 12 of a cardiac cause. The estimated one year survival rate was 49%. Six patients underwent or required valve replacement because of persisting symptoms. In view of its limited long term efficacy balloon dilatation of the aortic valve should be used only for patients with severe symptoms whose life expectancy is limited by other disease or who are considered to be unsuitable for valve replacement. It may have a role in improving the condition of patients who present with cardiogenic shock or pulmonary oedema before valve replacement is undertaken.     

Aortic Valvular Replacement: Clinical Experience With 13 Cases

Acquired aortic disease is now currently corrected by total prosthetic replacement of the aortic valve. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 13 cases at the Montreal Heart Institute in 1963. In the first four cases, Bahnson aortic leaflets were used; in the remaining nine, the Starr-Edwards semirigid aortic valve prosthesis. The surgical technique employed is described. There were two operative deaths and two late deaths. The results have been excellent in all of the survivors but one. They have returned to full-time activities and four of them to strenuous physical work. It is the contention of the authors that aortic valve replacement is a surgical procedure with acceptable risks, offering hope for a near-normal life to patients crippled by severe aortic valvular lesions.     

Prolapse of noncoronary aortic cusp with severe aortic regurgitation after a tear of the aortic root

A patient with acute aortic regurgitation, a dissecting aneurysm with a localized transverse tear just above the aortic valve, and an aortic noncoronary cusp eversion is discussed. The valvular defects were considered to be of recent etiology, and the patient underwent successful aortic valve replacement and repair of the dissection.     

同期行冠状动脉旁路移植和心脏瓣膜置换术治疗冠心病合并心脏瓣膜病的临床研究

目的:总结同期行冠状动脉旁路移植(CABG)和心脏瓣膜置换术治疗冠心病合并心脏瓣膜病的临床经验。方法:回顾性分析我院收治的41例接受冠状动脉旁路移植同期行心脏瓣膜置换术的冠心病合并心脏瓣膜病患者的临床资料,对手术方法、主要并发症和术后处理方法进行分析总结。结果:41例患者中,行二次开胸4例(9.76%),应用IABP 2例(4.88%),发生低心排综合征6例(14.63%)、肾功能不全6例(14.63%)、肺功能不全7例(17.07%)、脑合并症1例(2.44%)、胸腔积液4例(9.77%),死亡6例(13.63%),其余患者康复出院。结论:CABG同期行心脏瓣膜置换术治疗冠心病合并心脏瓣膜病的近期疗效满意。术前改善心功能,成熟的手术技术,完全的心肌再血管化,良好的心肌保护,停机困难者尽早应用主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)及加强术后处理是提高CABG同期行心脏瓣膜置换术疗效的重要措施。     

Current Status of Prosthetic Cardiac Valves

The majority of patients with acquired valvular heart disease have severe damage to valves which is not amenable to repair but can now be treated by valve replacement with an acceptable mortality and morbidity.The caged ball or disc valve is widely used and is proving clinically satisfactory for cardiac valve replacement. Thromboembolism is the significant complication. With improvement in technique the incidence of infection, detachment and other complications has been reduced.     

Allogenic heart valve bank in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology of Jagiellonian University in Cracow – 23 years experience in the treatment of aortic valve or aortic root diseases.

Allogenic aortic valves are widely used in case of native aortic valve or root disease as well as failed prosthetic valves with great success. At the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology of the Jagiellonian University in Cracow, aortic valve or aortic root replacement with allogenic aortic valve has been performed for 23 years. Allogenic heart valve bank was founded in 1980. In the bank we prepare both aortic allografts for adult cardiac surgical procedures and pulmonary allografts that are mostly used for repair of congenital heart disease.Allogenic aortic valves implantation was usually considered in our clinic for older patients, patients with infective endocarditis of the native or prosthetic valve, young women in reproductive age and patients with Marfan syndrome. Allografts exhibit excellent clinical performance and acceptable durability with no early failure if properly inserted. Between 1980 and 1992, allografts were obtained only from cadavers during routine autopsies. More than 10% of prepared allografts were exported to other cardiac surgery centres in Poland and foreign countries.Aortic valve replacement using allogenic aortic valves can be performed with acceptable mortality and good long-term results. The procedure although surgically more challenging has the advantage of not requiring anticoagulation therapy, hemodynamic performance of the allogenic valve is excellent, it demonstrates freedom from thromboembolism and infective endocarditis. We would like to emphasize the importance and advantages of the fact that allogenic heart valve bank is placed in the department of cardiovascular surgery and it is able to supply the department in heart valve allografts 24 h a day.     

Percutaneous valve procedures: present and future

Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy and aortic valvuloplasty have been being performed since the mid-1980s. Balloon commissurotomy has been used in thousands of cases worldwide and it provides good short- and long-term results in a wide range of patients. It has virtually replaced surgical commissurotomy in the treatment of mitral stenosis. In contrast, percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty is almost abandoned worldwide due to its lack of efficacy and the risks involved. The new techniques of percutaneous valve intervention: aortic valve replacement and mitral valve repair are at an early stage: the first in-man applications of these fledgling techniques started in 2002. Preliminary series show that they are feasible; however, they need to be further evaluated in comparison with contemporary treatment to assess accurately how efficient they are and the risks involved. Currently potential applications concern high-risk patients, however, in the future, after thorough evaluation, this may be extended to others. Thus, percutaneous interventions already play an important role in treatment of valvular heart disease, a role that seems set for future expansion.     

Respective impacts of aortic stenosis and systemic hypertension on left ventricular hypertrophy

It has been reported that 30-40% of patients with aortic stenosis are hypertensive. In such patients, the left ventricle faces a double (i.e. valvular and vascular) pressure overload, which results in subsequent wall volume hypertrophy. From a clinical standpoint, it is difficult to separate the respective contributions of aortic stenosis and systemic hypertension to left ventricular burden and patient's symptoms and thus to predict whether valve replacement would be beneficial. The objective of this theoretical study was therefore to investigate the relative effects of valvular and vascular afterloads on left ventricular hypertrophy. We used a ventricular-valvular-vascular mathematical model in combination with the Arts' model describing the myofiber stress. Left ventricular wall volume was computed for different aortic blood pressure levels and different degrees of aortic stenosis severity. Our simulations show that the presence of concomitant systemic hypertension has a major influence on the development of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis. These results also suggest that mild-to-moderate aortic stenosis has a minor impact on left ventricular wall volume when compared with hypertension. On the other hand, when aortic stenosis is severe, wall volume increases exponentially with increasing aortic stenosis severity and the impact of aortic stenosis on left ventricular hypertrophy becomes highly significant.     

微创小切口主动脉瓣置换术对主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床效果、心功能及术后时间的影响

目的:探讨微创小切口主动脉瓣置换术对主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床效果、心功能及术后时间的影响。方法:选择2017年5月-2018年11月我院收治的98例患者,随机分为观察组(n=49)和对照组(n=49)。对照组患者给予传统开胸主动脉瓣置换术,观察组患者给予微创小切口主动脉瓣置换术。观察比较两组临床疗效,心功能指标变化,术后时间变化。结果:观察组有效率为93.88%,明显高于对照组71.43%,两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术后左室射血分数(LVEF)、左室舒张末期直径(LVEDD)、平均跨瓣压差(MVPG)明显低于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组术室间隔厚度(IVST)高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组术后机械通气时间,ICU时间,住院时间明显低于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:微创小切口主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄临床疗效显著,可有效改善患者心功能,缩短治疗时间,提高患者生活质量,值得推广应用。     

LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION—The Clinical Importance of Findings

Left heart catheterization using the transbronchial route to obtain pressures in the left atrium and left ventricle was used successfully in 29 cases with no mortality or morbidity. It was found to be useful in differentiating between mitral stenosis and mitral insufficiency, as well as determining the amount of aortic stenosis present when there was involvement of the aortic valve. The technique was also helpful in determining which is the predominant lesion when there is a disease of the aortic and mitral valves.In two patients in a series of 29, data obtained by left heart catheterization forestalled operation on the basis of a mistaken diagnosis of mitral stenosis when actually no mitral valvular disease was present. In another eight patients, the predominant lesion was found to be mitral stenosis rather than mitral insufficiency as it was thought to be before catheterization. In two patients, who had only systolic murmurs, catheterization revealed mitral stenosis rather than mitral insufficiency. In four patients who were thought to have mixed valvular disease, left heart catheterization showed only aortic valvular disease.     

Combined replacement of the ascending aorta and the aortic valve in 42 consecutive patients: A comparison of composite graft techniques and conventional techniques over one year

During 1978, 42 consecutive patients underwent simultaneous aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement in our institution. Seventy-one percent were at low risk despite a high incidence of dissection. Twenty-nine percent were high-risk patients requiring repeat or concomitant cardiac procedures, mostly on an emergency basis. Depending upon the extent of the disease at the aortic root, either of two surgical approaches was used: (1) conventional aortic valve and supracoronary ascending aorta replacement, with or without right coronary artery ostium reimplantation, or (2) insertion of a composite graft containing an aortic valve prosthesis, with reconstruction of both coronary arteries. Preservation of coronary ostia was possible in 85% of the patients, and composite grafts were used in 15%. The conventional method was associated with a higher percentage of survivors. This technique was found to be satisfactory unless severe dilatation or complete destruction of the aortic annulus made composite grafting necessary. The latter technique was associated with fewer re-explorations for postoperative hemorrhage. Both procedures were equally effective, resulting in an operative mortality of 10% in uncomplicated situations. Surgery appeared to offer the only chance of survival for the high-risk group, and half of these patients were salvaged.     

Left heart catheterization; the clinical importance of findings

Left heart catheterization using the transbronchial route to obtain pressures in the left atrium and left ventricle was used successfully in 29 cases with no mortality or morbidity. It was found to be useful in differentiating between mitral stenosis and mitral insufficiency, as well as determining the amount of aortic stenosis present when there was involvement of the aortic valve. The technique was also helpful in determining which is the predominant lesion when there is a disease of the aortic and mitral valves. In two patients in a series of 29, data obtained by left heart catheterization forestalled operation on the basis of a mistaken diagnosis of mitral stenosis when actually no mitral valvular disease was present. In another eight patients, the predominant lesion was found to be mitral stenosis rather than mitral insufficiency as it was thought to be before catheterization. In two patients, who had only systolic murmurs, catheterization revealed mitral stenosis rather than mitral insufficiency. In four patients who were thought to have mixed valvular disease, left heart catheterization showed only aortic valvular disease.     

LOW PROFILE BIOPROSTHESIS FOR CARDIAC VALVE REPLACEMENT: EARLY CLINICAL RESULTS

Between May 1976 and April 1977, 100 patients underwent cardiac valve replacement with a unique low profile glutaraldehyde-treated porcine aortic xenograft. These patients were classified in four groups: Group I, 43 patients who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR); Group II, 27 patients who had isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR); Group III, 10 patients who had MVR and AVR; and Group IV, 20 patients who had MVR or AVR associated with other cardiac procedures. The operative mortality for Group I was 2.3% (1 of 43) and 15% (3 of 20) in Group IV. The total operative mortality was 4% (4 of 100) and the late mortality was 1.02% (1 of 96 survivors), who died apparently secondary to a cardiac arrhythmia. During a follow-up period extending for 16 months, thromboembolic complications occurred early in the postoperative period in 3% (3 of 100), one patient with neurological residual, and two patients with transient symptoms only. The embolic complications occurred only in Group I. Considering all patients in whom the mitral valves were replaced, the incidence of emboli was 4.9% (3 of 61). The 96 patients did not receive anticoagulant therapy. Reoperation was necessary in one patient because of periprosthetic leak. The incidence of endocarditis was 1.02% (1 of 96 survivors). We recommend anticoagulant therapy for eight to twelve weeks postoperatively in MVR patients after bioprosthetic insertion.