A novel membrane protein involved in protein translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli.

A novel factor, which is a membrane component of the protein translocation machinery of Escherichia coli, was discovered. This factor was found in the trichloracetic acid-soluble fraction of solubilized cytoplasmic membrane. The factor was purified to homogeneity by ion exchange column chromatographies and found to be a hydrophobic protein with a molecular mass of approximately 12 kDa. The factor caused > 20-fold stimulation of the protein translocation when it was reconstituted into proteoliposomes together with SecE and SecY. SecE, SecY, SecA and ATP were essential for the factor-dependent stimulation of the activity. The factor stimulated the translocation of all three precursor proteins examined, including authentic proOmpA. Stimulation of the translocation of proOmpF-Lpp, a model presecretory protein, was especially remarkable, since no translocation was observed unless proteoliposomes were reconstituted with the factor. Partial amino acid sequence of the purified factor was determined. An antibody raised against a synthetic peptide of this sequence inhibited the protein translocation into everted membrane vesicles, indicating that the factor is playing an important role in protein translocation into membrane vesicles. The partial amino acid sequence was found to coincide with that deduced from the reported DNA sequence of the upstream region of the leuU gene. Cloning and sequencing of the upstream region revealed the presence of a new open reading frame, which encodes a hydrophobic protein of 11.4 kDa. We propose that the factor is a general component of the protein translocation machinery of E. coli.     

State-of-the-art in membrane protein prediction

Membrane proteins are crucial for many biological functions and have become attractive targets for pharmacological agents. About 10%-30% of all proteins contain membrane-spanning helices. Despite recent successes, high-resolution structures for membrane proteins remain exceptional. The gap between known sequences and known structures calls for finding solutions through bioinformatics. While many methods predict membrane helices, very few predict membrane strands. The good news is that most methods for helical membrane proteins are available and are more often right than wrong. The best current prediction methods appear to correctly predict all membrane helices for about 50%-70% of all proteins, and to falsely predict membrane helices for about 10% of all globular proteins. The bad news is that developers have seriously overestimated the accuracy of their methods. In particular, while simple hydrophobicity scales identify many membrane helices, they frequently and incorrectly predict membrane helices in globular proteins. Additionally, all methods tend to confuse signal peptides with membrane helices. Nonetheless, wet-lab biologists can reach into an impressive toolbox for membrane protein predictions. However, the computational biologists will have to improve their methods considerably before they reach the levels of accuracy they claim.     

Lipids in membrane protein structures

This review describes the recent knowledge about tightly bound lipids in membrane protein structures and deduces general principles of the binding interactions. Bound lipids are grouped in annular, nonannular, and integral protein lipids. The importance of lipid binding for vertical positioning and tight integration of proteins in the membrane, for assembly and stabilization of oligomeric and multisubunit complexes, for supercomplexes, as well as their functional roles are pointed out. Lipid binding is stabilized by multiple noncovalent interactions from protein residues to lipid head groups and hydrophobic tails. Based on analysis of lipids with refined head groups in membrane protein structures, distinct motifs were identified for stabilizing interactions between the phosphodiester moieties and side chains of amino acid residues. Differences between binding at the electropositive and electronegative membrane side, as well as a preferential binding to the latter, are observed. A first attempt to identify lipid head group specific binding motifs is made. A newly identified cardiolipin binding site in the yeast cytochrome bc(1) complex is described. Assignment of unsaturated lipid chains and evolutionary aspects of lipid binding are discussed.     

Bipartite gating in the outer membrane protein FecA

The recent structure determination of FecA, with and without ligand, shows the existence of two gates. These are the extracellular loops closing over the binding site and the plug located inside the barrel. It indicates a process which is described as bipartite gating and allows for a rational distinction between the binding event and the transport process.     

TRAP assists membrane protein topogenesis at the mammalian ER membrane

Membrane protein insertion and topogenesis generally occur at the Sec61 translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. During this process, membrane spanning segments may adopt two distinct orientations with either their N- or C-terminus translocated into the ER lumen. While different topogenic determinants in membrane proteins, such as flanking charges, polypeptide folding, and hydrophobicity, have been identified, it is not well understood how the translocon and/or associated components decode them. Here we present evidence that the translocon-associated protein (TRAP) complex is involved in membrane protein topogenesis in vivo. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated silencing of the TRAP complex in HeLa cells enhanced the topology effect of mutating the flanking charges of a signal-anchor, but not of increasing signal hydrophobicity. The results suggest a role of the TRAP complex in moderating the ‘positive-inside’ rule.     

An ATP-binding membrane protein is required for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

The role of nucleotides in providing energy for polypeptide transfer across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is still unknown. To address this question, we treated ER-derived mammalian microsomal vesicles with a photoactivatable analogue of ATP, 8-N3ATP. This treatment resulted in a progressive inhibition of translocation activity. Approximately 20 microsomal membrane proteins were labeled by [alpha 32P]8-N3ATP. Two of these were identified as proteins with putative roles in translocation, alpha signal sequence receptor (SSR), the 35-kDa subunit of the signal sequence receptor complex, and ER-p180, a putative ribosome receptor. We found that there was a positive correlation between inactivation of translocation activity and photolabeling of alpha SSR. In contrast, our data demonstrate that the ATP-binding domain of ER-p180 is dispensable for translocation activity and does not contribute to the observed 8-N3ATP sensitivity of the microsomal vesicles.     

Thylakoid membrane protein phosphorylation in correlation with photosynthetic membrane activation

The phosphorylation of five $\text{E.}\text{gracilis}$ thylakoid membrane polypeptides was studied, in isolated chloroplasts. Using [³²P] labelling, in the light, we found that phosphorylation was inhibited by ethanol and DCMU. Inhibition curves were characteristic of photosynthetic inhibition. [γ-³²P] ATP labelling was used to distinguish between two groups of phosphoproteins: the first one, includes protein I, II, V which require only ATP for phosphorylation while the second one includes protein III and IV whose phosphorylation is light-requiring. Phosphorylation of protein III and IV was inhibited by CCCP, NH₄Cl and DCMU, and was reversible in the dark.     

Alternative membrane protein conformations in alcohols

Alcohols modulate the oligomerization of membrane proteins in lipid bilayers. This can occur indirectly by redistributing lateral membrane pressure in a manner which correlates with alcohol hydrophobicity. Here we investigate the direct impact of different alcohol-water mixtures on membrane protein stability and solubility, using the two detergent-solubilized alpha-helical membrane proteins DsbB and NhaA. Both proteins precipitate extensively at intermediate concentrations of alcohols, forming states with extensive (40-60%) beta-sheet structure and affinity for the fibril-specific dye thioflavin T, although atomic force microscopy images reveal layer-like and spherical deposits, possibly early stages in a fibrillation process trapped by strong hydrophobic contacts. At higher alcohol concentrations, both DsbB and NhaA are resolubilized and form non-native structures with increased (DsbB) or decreased (NhaA) helicity compared to the native state. The alternative conformational states cannot be returned to the functional native state upon dilution of alcohol. The efficiency of precipitation and the degree to which DsbB is destabilized at low alcohol concentrations show the same correlation with alcohol hydrophobicity. Thus, in addition to their effect on the membrane, alcohols perturb membrane proteins directly by solvating the hydrophobic regions of the protein. At intermediate concentrations, this perturbation exposes hydrophobic segments but does not provide sufficient solvation to avoid intermolecular association. Resolubilization requires a reduction in the relative dielectric constant below 65 in conjunction with specific properties of the individual alcohols. We conclude that alcohols provide access to a diversity of conformations for membrane proteins but are not a priori suitable for solution studies requiring reversible denaturation of monomeric proteins.     

Current concepts in membrane protein reconstitution

The reconstitution of integral proteins into artificial lipid vesicles is largely prompted by the complexity of most biological membranes and the inherent difficulty of studying individual components in situ. Ideally, therefore, the reconstituted system should consist of a single protein in a lipid matrix which mimics the native membrane in all but its diversity. While such an approach allows individual components of a complex system to be studied in isolation it should also be sufficiently versatile to permit the generation of increasingly sophisticated multicomponent models. From the considerable number of reconstitution techniques which have been developed I have tried in this review to identify those characteristics of a particular system which maximise both the information it can provide and its versatility.     

Structural insights into the membrane chaperones for multi-pass membrane protein biogenesis

Certain transmembrane α-helices of multi-pass membrane proteins line substrate transport paths or catalytic pockets and, therefore, are partially hydrophilic. Sec61 alone is insufficient to insert these less hydrophobic segments into the membrane and needs to work with dedicated membrane chaperones. Three such membrane chaperones have been described in the literature—the endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein complex (EMC), the TMCO1 complex, and the PAT complex. Recent structural studies on these membrane chaperones have revealed their overall architecture, multi-subunit assembly, putative substrate transmembrane helix-binding pockets, and cooperative mechanisms with the ribosome and Sec61 translocon. These structures are providing initial insights into the poorly understood processes of multi-pass membrane protein biogenesis.     

Revolutionizing membrane protein overexpression in bacteria

The bacterium Escherichia coli is the most widely used expression host for overexpression trials of membrane proteins. Usually, different strains, culture conditions and expression regimes are screened for to identify the optimal overexpression strategy. However, yields are often not satisfactory, especially for eukaryotic membrane proteins. This has initiated a revolution of membrane protein overexpression in bacteria. Recent studies have shown that it is feasible to (i) engineer or select for E. coli strains with strongly improved membrane protein overexpression characteristics, (ii) use bacteria other than E. coli for the expression of membrane proteins, (iii) engineer or select for membrane protein variants that retain functionality but express better than the wild-type protein, and (iv) express membrane proteins using E. coli-based cell-free systems.     

Rationalizing membrane protein overexpression

Functional and structural studies of membrane proteins usually require overexpression of the proteins in question. Often, however, the 'trial and error' approaches that are mainly used to produce membrane proteins are not successful. Our rapidly increasing understanding of membrane protein insertion, folding and degradation means that membrane protein overexpression can be more rationalized, both at the level of the overexpression host and the overexpressed membrane protein. This change of mindset is likely to have a significant impact on membrane protein research.     

How to quantify protein diffusion in the bacterial membrane

Lateral diffusion of proteins in the plane of a biological membrane is important for many vital processes, including energy conversion, signaling, chemotaxis, cell division, protein insertion, and secretion. In bacteria, all these functions are located in a single membrane. Therefore, quantitative measurements of protein diffusion in bacterial membranes can provide insight into many important processes. Diffusion of membrane proteins in eukaryotes has been studied in detail using various experimental techniques, including fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), and particle tracking using single-molecule fluorescence (SMF) microscopy. In case of bacteria, such experiments are intrinsically difficult due to the small size of the cells. Here, we review these experimental approaches to quantify diffusion in general and their strengths and weaknesses when applied to bacteria. In addition, we propose a method to extract multiple diffusion coefficients from trajectories obtained from SMF data, using cumulative probability distributions (CPDs). We demonstrate the power of this approach by quantifying the heterogeneous diffusion of the bacterial membrane protein TatA, which forms a pore for the translocation of folded proteins. Using computer simulations, we study the effect of cell dimensions and membrane curvature on measured CPDs. We find that at least two mobile populations with distinct diffusion coefficients (of 7 and 169 nm(2) ms(-1) , respectively) are necessary to explain the experimental data. The approach described here should be widely applicable for the quantification of membrane-protein diffusion in living bacteria.     

Separation methods in the analysis of protein membrane complexes

The separation of membrane protein complexes can be divided into two categories. One category, which is operated on a relatively large scale, aims to purify the membrane protein complex from membrane fractions while retaining its native form, mainly to characterize its nature. The other category aims to analyze the constituents of the membrane protein complex, usually on a small scale. Both of these face the difficulty of isolating the membrane protein complex without interference originating from the hydrophobic nature of membrane proteins or from the close association with membrane lipids. To overcome this difficulty, many methods have been employed. Crystallized membrane protein complexes are the most successful example of the former category. In these purification methods, special efforts are made in the steps prior to the column chromatography to enrich the target membrane protein complexes. Although there are specific aspects for each complex, the most popular method for isolating these membrane protein complexes is anion-exchange column chromatography, especially using weak anion-exchange columns. Another remarkable trend is metal affinity column chromatography, which purifies the membrane protein complex as an intact complex in one step. Such protein complexes contain subunit proteins which are genetically engineered so as to include multiple-histidine tags at carboxyl- or amino-termini. The key to these successes for multi-subunit complex isolation is the idea of keeping the expression at its physiological level, rather than overexpression. On the other hand, affinity purification using the Fv fragment, in which a Strep tag is genetically introduced, is ideal because this method does not introduce any change to the target protein. These purification methods supported by affinity interaction can be applied to minor membrane protein complexes in the membrane system. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) and blue native (BN) electrophoresis have also been employed to prepare membrane protein complexes. Generally, a combination of two or more chromatographic and/or electrophoretic methods is conducted to separate membrane protein complexes. IEF or BN electrophoresis followed by 2nd dimension electrophoresis serve as useful tools for analytical demand. However, some problems still exist in the 2D electrophoresis using IEF. To resolve such problems, many attempts have been made, e.g. introduction of new chaotropes, surfactants, reductants or supporting matrices. This review will focus in particular on two topics: the preparative methods that achieved purification of membrane protein complexes in the native (intact) form, and the analytical methods oriented to resolve the membrane proteins. The characteristics of these purification and analytical methods will be discussed along with plausible future developments taking into account the nature of membrane protein complexes.     

Bacterial-based membrane protein production

Escherichia coli is by far the most widely used bacterial host for the production of membrane proteins. Usually, different strains, culture conditions and production regimes are screened for to design the optimal production process. However, these E. coli-based screening approaches often do not result in satisfactory membrane protein production yields. Recently, it has been shown that (i) E. coli strains with strongly improved membrane protein production characteristics can be engineered or selected for, (ii) many membrane proteins can be efficiently produced in E. coli-based cell-free systems, (iii) bacteria other than E. coli can be used for the efficient production of membrane proteins, and, (iv) membrane protein variants that retain functionality but are produced at higher yields than the wild-type protein can be engineered or selected for. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.