Cell cycle-dependent localization of two novel prokaryotic chromosome segregation and condensation proteins in Bacillus subtilis that interact with SMC protein

Disruption of ypuG and ypuH open reading frames in Bacillus subtilis leads to temperature-sensitive slow growth, a defect in chromosome structure and formation of anucleate cells. The genes, which were named scpA and scpB, were found to be epistatic to the smc gene. Fusions of ScpA and ScpB to the fluorescent proteins YFP or CFP showed that both proteins co-localize to two or four discrete foci that were present at mid-cell in young cells, and within both cell halves, generally adjacent to chromosomal origin regions, in older cells. ScpA and ScpB foci are associated with DNA and depend on the presence of SMC and both Scps. ScpA and ScpB are associated with each other and with SMC in vivo, as determined using the FRET technique and immunoprecipitation assays. Genes similar to scpA and scpB are present in many bacteria and archaea, which suggests that their gene products form a condensation complex with SMC in most prokaryotes. The observed foci could constitute condensation factories that pull DNA away from mid-cell into both cell halves.     

Discovery of two novel families of proteins that are proposed to interact with prokaryotic SMC proteins,and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis family members ScpA and ScpB

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins are present in all eukaryotes and in many prokaryotes. Eukaryotic SMC proteins form complexes with various non-SMC subunits, which affect their function, whereas the prokaryotic homologues had no known non-SMC partners and were thought to act as simple homodimers. Here we describe two novel families of proteins, widespread in archaea and (Gram-positive) bacteria, which we denote 'segregation and condensation proteins' (Scps). ScpA genes are localized next to smc genes in nearly all SMC- containing archaea, suggesting that they belong to the same operon and are thus involved in a common process in the cell. The function of ScpA was studied in Bacillus subtilis, which also harbours a well characterized smc gene. Here we show that scpA mutants display characteristic phenotypes nearly identical to those of smc mutants, including temperature- sensitive growth, production of anucleate cells, formation of aberrant nucleoids, and chromosome splitting by the so-called guillotine effect. Thus, both SMC and ScpA are required for chromosome segregation and condensation. Interestingly, mutants of another B. subtilis gene, scpB, which is localized downstream from scpA, display the same phenotypes, which indicate that ScpB is also involved in these functions. ScpB is generally present in species that also encode ScpA. The physical interaction of ScpA and SMC was proven (i) by the use of the yeast two-hybrid system and (ii) by the isolation of a complex containing both proteins from cell extracts of B. subtilis. By extension, we speculate that interaction of orthologues of the two proteins is important for chromosome segregation in many archaea and bacteria, and propose that SMC proteins generally have non-SMC protein partners that affect their function not only in eukaryotes but also in prokaryotes.     

A prokaryotic condensin/cohesin-like complex can actively compact chromosomes from a single position on the nucleoid and binds to DNA as a ring-like structure

We show that Bacillus subtilis SMC (structural maintenance of chromosome protein) localizes to discrete foci in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Early in the cell cycle, SMC moves from the middle of the cell toward opposite cell poles in a rapid and dynamic manner and appears to interact with different regions on the chromosomes during the cell cycle. SMC colocalizes with its interacting partners, ScpA and ScpB, and the specific localization of SMC depends on both Scp proteins, showing that all three components of the SMC complex are required for proper localization. Cytological and biochemical experiments showed that dimeric ScpB stabilized the binding of ScpA to the SMC head domains. Purified SMC showed nonspecific binding to double-stranded DNA, independent of Scp proteins or ATP, and was retained on DNA after binding to closed DNA but not to linear DNA. The SMC head domains and hinge region did not show strong DNA binding activity, suggesting that the coiled-coil regions in SMC mediate an association with DNA and that SMC binds to DNA as a ring-like structure. The overproduction of SMC resulted in global chromosome compaction, while SMC was largely retained in bipolar foci, suggesting that the SMC complex forms condensation centers that actively affect global chromosome compaction from a defined position on the nucleoid.     

Positive and negative regulation of SMC-DNA interactions by ATP and accessory proteins

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins are central regulators of higher-order chromosome dynamics from bacteria to humans. The Bacillus subtilis SMC (BsSMC) homodimer adopts a V-shaped structure with an ATP-binding catalytic domain at each end. We report here that two small proteins, ScpA and ScpB, associate with the catalytic domains of BsSMC in an ordered fashion and suppress its ATPase activity. When combined with a 'transition state' mutant of BsSMC that poorly hydrolyzes ATP, ScpA promotes stable engagement of two catalytic domains in an ATP-dependent manner. In solution, this occurs intramolecularly and closes the DNA-entry gate of an SMC dimer. ScpB further stabilizes this conformation and prevents BsSMC from binding to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). In contrast, when the mutant BsSMC is first allowed to interact with dsDNA, subsequent addition of ScpA leads to assembly of large nucleoprotein complexes, possibly by stabilizing intermolecular engagement of the catalytic domains from different SMC dimers. We propose that the ATP-modulated engagement/disengagement cycle of SMC proteins plays both positive and negative roles in their dynamic interactions with dsDNA.     

Using DNA as a fiducial marker to study SMC complex interactions with the atomic force microscope

Atomic force microscopy can potentially provide information on protein volumes, shapes, and interactions but is susceptible to variable tip-induced artifacts. In this study, we present an atomic force microscopy approach that can measure volumes of nonglobular polypeptides such as structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins, and use it to study the interactions that occur within and between SMC complexes. Together with the protein of interest, we coadsorb a DNA molecule and use it as a fiducial marker to account for tip-induced artifacts that affect both protein and DNA, allowing normalization of protein volumes from images taken on different days and with different tips. This approach significantly reduced the error associated with volume analysis, and allowed determination of the oligomeric states and architecture of the Bacillus subtilis SMC complex, formed by the SMC protein, and by the smaller ScpA and ScpB subunits. This work reveals that SMC and ScpB are dimers and that ScpA is a stable monomer. Moreover, whereas ScpA binds directly to SMC, ScpB only binds to SMC in the presence of ScpA. Notably, the presence of both ScpA and ScpB favored the formation of higher-order structures of SMC complexes, suggesting a role for these subunits in the organization of SMC oligomers.     

Dynamic assembly,localization and proteolysis of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacillus subtilis</Emphasis> SMC complex

Background  

SMC proteins are key components of several protein complexes that perform vital tasks in different chromosome dynamics. Bacterial SMC forms a complex with ScpA and ScpB that is essential for chromosome arrangement and segregation. The complex localizes to discrete centres on the nucleoids that during most of the time of the cell cycle localize in a bipolar manner. The complex binds to DNA and condenses DNA in an as yet unknown manner.     

Subcellular localization of the Bacillus subtilis structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein

The Bacillus subtilis structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) protein is a member of a large family of proteins involved in chromosome organization. We found that SMC is a moderately abundant protein ( approximately 1000 dimers per cell). In vivo cross-linking and immunoprecipitation assays revealed that SMC binds to many regions on the chromosome. Visualization of SMC in live cells using a fusion to the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and in fixed cells using immunofluorescence microscopy indicated that a portion of SMC localizes as discrete foci in positions similar to that of the DNA replication machinery (replisome). When visualized simultaneously, SMC and the replisome were often in similar regions of the cell but did not always co-localize. Persistence of SMC foci did not depend on ongoing replication, but did depend on ScpA and ScpB, two proteins thought to interact with SMC. Our results indicate that SMC is bound to many sites on the chromosome and a concentration of SMC is localized near replication forks, perhaps there to bind and organize newly replicated DNA.     

Comparison of Staphopain A (ScpA) and B (SspB) precursor activation mechanisms reveals unique secretion kinetics of proSspB (Staphopain B), and a different interaction with its cognate Staphostatin, SspC

The scp AB and ssp ABC operons of Staphylococcus aureus encode Staphopain cysteine proteases ScpA and SspB, and their respective Staphostatins ScpB and SspC, which are thought to protect against premature activation of Staphopain precursors during protein export. However, we found that the proSspB precursor was secreted and activated without detriment to S. aureus in the absence of SspC function. Our data indicate that this is feasible due to a restricted substrate specificity of mature SspB, a stable precursor structure and slow secretion kinetics. In contrast, mature ScpA had a broad substrate specificity, such that it was prone to autolytic degradation, but also was uniquely able to degrade elastin fibres. Modelling of proScpA relative to the proSspB structure identified several differences, which appear to optimize proScpA for autocatalytic activation, whereas proSspB is optimized for stability, and cannot initiate autocatalytic activation. Consequently, recombinant proSspB remained stable and unprocessed when retained in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli , whereas proScpA initiated rapid autocatalytic activation, leading to capture of an activation intermediate by ScpB. We conclude that the status of ssp BC in S. aureus , as paralogues of the ancestral scp AB genes, facilitated a different activation mechanism, a stable proSspB isoform and modified Staphostatin function.     

Model for Substrate Interactions in C5a Peptidase from Streptococcus pyogenes: A 1.9 Å Crystal Structure of the Active Form of ScpA

The crystal structure of an active form of ScpA has been solved to 1.9 Å resolution. ScpA is a multidomain cell-envelope subtilase from Streptococcus pyogenes that cleaves complement component C5a. The catalytic triad of ScpA is geometrically consistent with other subtilases, clearly demonstrating that the additional activation mechanism proposed for the Streptococcus agalactiae homologue (ScpB) is not required for ScpA. The ScpA structure revealed that access to the catalytic site is restricted by variable regions in the catalytic domain (vr7, vr9, and vr11) and by the presence of the inserted protease-associated (PA) domain and the second fibronectin type III domains (Fn2). Modeling of the ScpA-C5a complex indicates that the substrate binds with carboxyl-terminal residues (65-74) extended through the active site and core residues (1-64) forming exosite-type interactions with the Fn2 domain. This is reminiscent of the two-site mechanism proposed for C5a binding to its receptor. In the nonprime region of the active site, interactions with the substrate backbone are predicted to be more similar to those observed in kexins, involving a single β-strand in the peptidase. However, in contrast to kexins, there would be diminished emphasis on side-chain interactions, with little charged character in the S3-S1 and S6-S4 subsites occupied by the side chains of residues in vr7 and vr9. Substrate binding is anticipated to be dominated by ionic interactions in two distinct regions of ScpA. On the prime side of the active site, salt bridges are predicted between P1′, P2′, and P7′ residues, and residues in the catalytic and PA domains. Remote to the active site, a larger number of ionic interactions between residues in the C5a core and the Fn2 domain are observed in the model. Thus, both PA and Fn2 domains are expected to play significant roles in substrate recognition.     

Defense against own arms: staphylococcal cysteine proteases and their inhibitors

Staphylococcus aureus is a human pathogen causing a wide range of diseases. Most staphylococcal infections, unlike those caused by other bacteria are not toxigenic and very little is known about their pathogenesis. It has been proposed that a core of secreted proteins common to many infectious strains is responsible for colonization and infection. Among those proteins several proteases are present and over the years many different functions in the infection process have been attributed to them. However, little direct, in vivo data has been presented. Two cysteine proteases, staphopain A (ScpA) and staphopain B (SspB) are important members of this group of enzymes. Recently, two cysteine protease inhibitors, staphostatin A and staphostatin B (ScpB and SspC, respectively) were described in S. aureus shedding new light on the complexity of the processes involving the two proteases. The scope of this review is to summarize current knowledge on the network of staphylococcal cysteine proteases and their inhibitors in view of their possible role as virulence factors.     

Association of small CAB-like proteins (SCPs) of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 with Photosystem II

The cyanobacterial small CAB-like proteins (SCPs) are one-helix proteins with compelling similarity to the first and third transmembrane helix of proteins belonging to the CAB family of light-harvesting complex proteins in plants. The SCP proteins are transiently expressed at high light intensity and other stress conditions but their exact function remains largely unknown. Recently we showed association of ScpD with light-stressed, monomeric Photosystem II in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (Yao et al. J Biol Chem 282:267–276, 2007). Here we show that ScpB associates with Photosystem II at normal growth conditions. Moreover, upon introduction of a construct into Synechocystis so that ScpB is expressed continuously under normal growth conditions, ScpE was detected under non-stressed conditions as well, and was copurified with tagged ScpB and Photosystem II. We also report on a one-helix protein, Slr1544, that is somewhat similar to the SCPs and whose gene is cotranscribed with that of ScpD; Slr1544 is another member of the extended light-harvesting-like (Lil) protein family, and we propose to name it LilA. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Galyna Kufryk and Miguel Hernandez-Prieto have contributed equally to this work.     

Experimental condensation inhibition in constitutive and facultative heterochromatin of mammalian chromosomes

What drives the dramatic changes in chromosome structure during the cell cycle is one of the oldest questions in genetics. During mitosis, all chromosomes become highly condensed and, as the cell completes mitosis, most of the chromatin decondenses again. Only chromosome regions containing constitutive or facultative heterochromatin remain in a more condensed state throughout interphase. One approach to understanding chromosome condensation is to experimentally induce condensation defects. 5-Azacytidine (5-aza-C) and 5-azadeoxycytidine (5-aza-dC) drastically inhibit condensation in mammalian constitutive heterochromatin, in particular in human chromosomes 1, 9, 15, 16, and Y, as well as in facultative heterochromatin (inactive X chromosome), when incorporated into late-replicating DNA during the last hours of cell culture. The decondensing effects of 5-aza-C analogs, which do not interfere with normal base pairing in substituted duplex DNA, have been correlated with global DNA hypomethylation. In contrast, decondensation of constitutive heterochromatin by incorporation of 5-iododeoxyuridine (IdU) or other non-demethylating base analogs, or binding of AT-specific DNA ligands, such as berenil and Hoechst 33258, may reflect an altered steric configuration of substituted or minor-groove-bound duplex DNA. Consequently, these compounds exert relatively specific effects on certain subsets of AT-rich constitutive heterochromatin, i.e. IdU on human chromosome 9, berenil on human Y, and Hoechst 33258 on mouse chromosomes, which provide high local concentrations of IdU incorporation sites or DNA-ligand-binding sites. None of these non-demethylating compounds affect the inactive X chromosome condensation. Structural features of chromosomes are largely determined by chromosome-associated proteins. In this light, we propose that both DNA hypomethylation and steric alterations in chromosomal DNA may interfere with the binding of specific proteins or multi-protein complexes that are required for chromosome condensation. The association between chromosome condensation defects, genomic instability, and epigenetic reprogramming is discussed. Chromosome condensation may represent a key ancestral mechanism for modulating chromatin structure that has since been realloted to other nuclear processes.     

Kleisins: a superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners

We describe a superfamily of eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins (kleisins) that includes ScpA, Scc1, Rec8, and Barren. Scc1 interacts with SMC proteins through N- and C-terminal domains to form a ring-like structure. Since these are the only domains conserved among kleisins, we suggest that ring formation with SMC proteins may define this family.     

The archaeal cell cycle: current issues

The recently discovered structural similarities between the archaeal Orc1/Cdc6 and bacterial DnaA initiator proteins for chromosome replication have exciting implications for cell cycle regulation. Together with current attempts to identify archaeal chromosome replication origins, the information is likely to yield fundamental insights into replication control in both archaea and eukaryotes within the near future. Several proteins that affect, or are likely to affect, chromatin structure and genome segregation in archaea have been described recently, including Sph1 and 2, ScpA and B, Sir2, Alba and Rio1p. Important insights into the properties of the MinD and FtsZ cell division proteins, and of putative cytoskeletal elements, have recently been gained in bacteria. As these proteins also are present among archaea, it is likely that the new information will also be essential for understanding archaeal genome segregation and cell division. A series of interesting cell cycle issues has been brought to light through the discovery of the novel Nanoarchaeota phylum, and these are outlined briefly. Exciting areas for extended cell cycle investigations of archaea are identified, including termination of chromosome replication, application of in situ cytological techniques for localization of cell cycle proteins and the regulatory roles of GTP-binding proteins and small RNAs.     

Localization of the small CAB-like proteins in photosystem II

The cyanobacterial small CAB-like proteins (SCPs) consist of one-helix proteins that resemble transmembrane regions of the light-harvesting proteins of plants. To determine whether these proteins are associated with protein complexes in the thylakoid membrane, an abundant member of the SCP family, ScpD, was marked with a His tag, and proteins co-isolating with His-tagged ScpD were identified. These proteins included the major Photosystem (PS) II components as well as FtsH, which is involved in degradation of the PSII complex. To ascertain specific interaction between ScpD and the PSII complex, the His-tagged protein fraction was subjected to two-dimensional blue native/SDS-PAGE. Again, PSII components were co-isolated with ScpD-His, and ScpD-His was found to interact most strongly with CP47. ScpD association was most prominent with the monomeric form of PSII, suggesting ScpD association with PSII that is repaired. Using antibodies that recognize both ScpC and ScpD, we found the ScpC protein, which is very similar in primary structure to ScpD, to also co-isolate with the PSII complex. In contrast, ScpE did not co-isolate with a major protein complex in thylakoids. A fourth member of the SCP family, ScpB, could not be immunodetected, but was found by mass spectrometry in samples co-isolating with ScpD-His. Therefore, ScpB may be associated with ScpD as well. No association between SCPs and PSI could be demonstrated. On the basis of these and other data presented, we suggest that members of the SCP family can associate with damaged PSII and can serve as a temporary pigment reservoir while PSII components are being replaced.     

In vivo dissection of the chromosome condensation machinery: reversibility of condensation distinguishes contributions of condensin and cohesin

The machinery mediating chromosome condensation is poorly understood. To begin to dissect the in vivo function(s) of individual components, we monitored mitotic chromosome structure in mutants of condensin, cohesin, histone H3, and topoisomerase II (topo II). In budding yeast, both condensation establishment and maintenance require all of the condensin subunits, but not topo II activity or phospho-histone H3. Structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) protein 2, as well as each of the three non-SMC proteins (Ycg1p, Ycs4p, and Brn1p), was required for chromatin binding of the condensin complex in vivo. Using reversible condensin alleles, we show that chromosome condensation does not involve an irreversible modification of condensin or chromosomes. Finally, we provide the first evidence of a mechanistic link between condensin and cohesin function. A model discussing the functional interplay between cohesin and condensin is presented.     

The small CAB-like proteins of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 bind chlorophyll

The large family of light-harvesting-like proteins contains members with one to four membrane spanning helices with significant homology to the chlorophyll a/b-binding antenna proteins of plants. From structural as well as evolutionary perspective, it is likely that the members of this family bind chlorophylls and carotenoids. However, undisputable evidence is still lacking. The cyanobacterial small CAB-like proteins (SCPs) are one-helix proteins with compelling similarity to the first and third transmembrane helix of LHCII (LHCIIb) including the chlorophyll-binding motifs. They have been proposed to act as chlorophyll-carrier proteins. Here, we analyze the in vivo absorption spectra of single scp deletion mutants in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and compare the in vitro pigment binding ability of the SCP pairs ScpC/D and ScpB/E with the one of LHCII and a synthetic peptide containing the chlorophyll-binding motif (Eggink LL, Hoober JK (2000) J Biol Chem 275:9087-9090). We demonstrate that deletion of scpB alters the pigmentation in the cyanobacterial cell. Furthermore, we are able to show that chlorophylls and carotenoids interact in vitro with the pairs of ScpC/D and ScpB/E, demonstrated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer and circular dichroism.     

The SMC proteins and the coming of age of the chromosome scaffold hypothesis

The mechanism of chromosome condensation is one of the classic mysteries of mitosis. A number of years ago, it was suggested that nonhistone proteins of the chromosome scaffold fraction might help chromosomes to condense, possibly by constructing a framework for the condensed structure. Recent results have shown that topoisomerase II and the SMC proteins, two abundant members of the scaffold fraction, are required for chromosome condensation and segregation during mitosis. Topoisomerase II is a well-characterized enzyme. In contrast, nothing is yet known about the function of the SMC proteins. We summarize evidence suggesting that these proteins may be enzymes whose activity is somehow involved in the establishment and maintenance of mitotic chromosome morphology.     

The protease associated (PA) domain in ScpA from Streptococcus pyogenes plays a role in substrate recruitment

Annually, over 18 million disease cases and half a million deaths worldwide are estimated to be caused by Group A Streptococcus. ScpA (or C5a peptidase) is a well characterised member of the cell enveleope protease family, which possess a S8 subtilisin-like catalytic domain and a shared multi-domain architecture. ScpA cleaves complement factors C5a and C3a, impairing the function of these critical anaphylatoxins and disrupts complement-mediated innate immunity. Although the high resolution structure of ScpA is known, the details of how it recognises its substrate are only just emerging. Previous studies have identified a distant exosite on the 2nd fibronectin domain that plays an important role in recruitment via an interaction with the substrate core. Here, using a combination of solution NMR spectroscopy, mutagenesis with functional assays and computational approaches we identify a second exosite within the protease-associated (PA) domain. We propose a model in which the PA domain assists optimal delivery of the substrate's C terminus to the active site for cleavage.