Temporal patterns and selectivity in the unitary responses of olfactory receptors in the tiger salamander to odor stimulation

Temporal patterns and selectivity in unitary responses of 100 single olfactory receptors in the tiger salamander to odor stimulation were investigated. An olfactometer which permitted control of stimulus concentration, duration, and flow rate was calibrated with a gas chromatograph. Stimulus pulses were monitored by recording the electroolfactogram from the surface of the olfactory epithelium. Both diphasic and triphasic spikes were recorded extracellularly. No discernible differences in types of responses, reproducibility of responses, and cross-unit distribution of spontaneous rates distinguished diphasic from triphasic units. The cross-unit selectivity in responses to the seven olfactory stimulants used and the range of odorant concentrations which effectively evoked these responses suggest variations in types and number of types of receptive sites on each cell. Temporal patterns in the unitary responses were generally less complex than those observed in the olfactory bulb. Phasic stimulations evoked phasic patterns. Tonic stimulations evoked phasic/tonic patterns. Occasionally poststimulus depressions or elevations in firing rates were observed. The nature of these patterns varied somewhat with odorant concentration for a particular unit.     

Identification of second messenger mediating signal transduction in the olfactory receptor cell

One of the biggest controversial issues in the research of olfaction has been the mechanism underlying response generation to odorants that have been shown to fail to produce cAMP when tested by biochemical assays with olfactory ciliary preparations. Such observations are actually the original source proposing a possibility for the presence of multiple and parallel transduction pathways. In this study the activity of transduction channels in the olfactory cilia was recorded in cells that retained their abilities of responding to odorants that have been reported to produce InsP3 (instead of producing cAMP, and therefore tentatively termed "InsP3 odorants"). At the same time, the cytoplasmic cNMP concentration ([cNMP]i) was manipulated through the photolysis of caged compounds to examine their real-time interactions with odorant responses. Properties of responses induced by both InsP3 odorants and cytoplasmic cNMP resembled each other in their unique characteristics. Reversal potentials of currents were 2 mV for InsP3 odorant responses and 3 mV for responses induced by cNMP. Current and voltage (I-V) relations showed slight outward rectification. Both responses showed voltage-dependent adaptation when examined with double pulse protocols. When brief pulses of the InsP3 odorant and cytoplasmic cNMP were applied alternatively, responses expressed cross-adaptation with each other. Furthermore, both responses were additive in a manner as predicted quantitatively by the theory that signal transduction is mediated by the increase in cytoplasmic cAMP. With InsP3 odorants, actually, remarkable responses could be detected in a small fraction of cells ( approximately 2%), explaining the observation for a small production of cAMP in ciliary preparations obtained from the entire epithelium. The data will provide evidence showing that olfactory response generation and adaptation are regulated by a uniform mechanism for a wide variety of odorants.     

The Role of Perceptual and Structural Similarity in Cross-adaptation

Cross-adaptation, the decrease in sensitivity to one odorantfollowing exposure to a different odorant, is affected by odorantsimilarity, both perceptual and structural, but the preciserelationship is obscure. The present series of studies was designedto explore various aspects of perceptual and structural similarityas they relate to cross-adaptation. In Experiment 1, cross-adaptationwas assessed between androstenone and five odorants that sharea common urinous note with androstenone, but retain unique perceptualcharacteristics; only the compound judged most perceptuallysimilar to androstenone cross-adapted it. In Experiment 2, odorantsboth perceptually and structurally similar (androstenone andandrostanone) displayed significant, mutual cross-adaptation.Furthermore, magnitude estimates for androstanone were significantlyreduced following exposure to 3-methylidene-5a-androstane (3M5A),a structurally similar, perceptually odorless compound. Thisfinding appears to be the first demonstration that an odorlesscompound can affect, via cross-adaptation, the perception ofan odorous compound. Finally, in Experiment 3, significant,asymmetric cross-adaptation was observed between compounds thatare perceptually and structurally dissimilar (4-cyclohexylcyclohexanone[4-CHCH] and androstenone). These findings indicate that therole of similarity in cross-adaptation is difficult to quantifyand emphasize the numerous odorant characteristics that canaffect cross-adaptation. Chem. Senses 21: 223–237, 1996.     

Molecular receptive range variation among mouse odorant receptors for aliphatic carboxylic acids

The ability of mammals to identify and distinguish among many thousands of different odorants suggests a combinatorial use of odorant receptors, with each receptor detecting multiple odorants and each odorant interacting with multiple receptors. Numerous receptors may be devoted to the sampling of particularly important regions of odor space. In this study, we explore the similarities and differences in the molecular receptive ranges of four mouse odorant receptors (MOR23-1, MOR31-4, MOR32-11 and MOR40-4), which have previously been identified as receptors for aliphatic carboxylic acids. Each receptor was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, along with Gα_olf and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator to allow electrophysiological assay of receptor responses. We find that even though these receptors are relatively unrelated, there is extensive overlap among their receptive ranges. That is, these receptors sample a similar region of odor space. However, the receptive range of each receptor is unique. Thus, these receptors contribute to the depth of coverage of this small region of odor space. Such a group of receptors with overlapping, but distinct receptive ranges, may participate in making fine distinctions among complex mixtures of closely related odorant compounds.     

Neural Sensitivity to Odorants in Deprived and Normal Olfactory Bulbs

Early olfactory deprivation in rodents is accompanied by an homeostatic regulation of the synaptic connectivity in the olfactory bulb (OB). However, its consequences in the neural sensitivity and discrimination have not been elucidated. We compared the odorant sensitivity and discrimination in early sensory deprived and normal OBs in anesthetized rats. We show that the deprived OB exhibits an increased sensitivity to different odorants when compared to the normal OB. Our results indicate that early olfactory stimulation enhances discriminability of the olfactory stimuli. We found that deprived olfactory bulbs adjusts the overall excitatory and inhibitory mitral cells (MCs) responses to odorants but the receptive fields become wider than in the normal olfactory bulbs. Taken together, these results suggest that an early natural sensory stimulation sharpens the receptor fields resulting in a larger discrimination capability. These results are consistent with previous evidence that a varied experience with odorants modulates the OB''s synaptic connections and increases MCs selectivity.     

Regulation of intracellular cyclic GMP levels in olfactory sensory neurons

Cyclic AMP is the primary second messenger mediating odorant signal transduction in mammals. A number of studies indicate that cyclic GMP is also involved in a variety of other olfactory signal transduction processes, including adaptation, neuronal development, and long-term cellular responses in the setting of odorant stimulation. However, the mechanisms that control the production and degradation of cGMP in olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) remain unclear. Here, we investigate these mechanisms using primary cultures of OSNs. We demonstrate that odorants increase cGMP levels in intact OSNs in vitro. Different from the rapid and transient cAMP responses to odorants, the cGMP elevation is both delayed and sustained. Inhibition of soluble guanylyl cyclase and heme oxygenase blocks these odorant-induced cGMP increases, whereas inhibition of cGMP PDEs (phosphodiesterases) increases this response. cGMP PDE activity is increased by odorant stimulation, and is sensitive to both ambient calcium and cAMP concentrations. Calcium stimulates cGMP PDE activity, whereas cAMP and protein kinase A appears to inhibit it. These data demonstrate a mechanism by which odorant stimulation may regulate cGMP levels through the modulation of cAMP and calcium level in OSNs. Such interactions between odorants and second messenger systems may be important to the integration of immediate and long-term responses in the setting odorant stimulation.     

Concentration and Membrane Fluidity Dependence of Odor Discrimination in the Turtle Olfactory System

In the present study, we examined the concentration dependenceof odor discrimination in turtle olfactory bulbar responsesusing the cross-adaptation technique. In the odorant pairs withdiverse molecular structures, the degree of discrimination wasunchanged or only slightly decreased with an increase in odorantconcentrations, suggesting that odorants are well discriminatedeven at high concentrations. In the odorant pairs with closelyrelated molecular structures, the degree of discrimination wasdecreased with an increase in odorant concentrations. An increasein the temperature of turtle olfactory epithelium also decreasedthe ability to discriminate these odorants. There was a goodcorrelation between changes in the odor discriminating abilityinduced by an increase in odor concentrations and those inducedby a temperature increase. The liposomes were made of lipidsextracted from the turtle olfactory epithelia and changes oftheir membrane fluidity induced by adsorption of odorants weremonitored with DPH. There was a good correlation between a decreasein odor discriminating ability and the membrane fluidity changesinduced by odorants. We suggest that decreases in odor discriminatingability induced either by an increase in odor concentrationor by a temperature increase are ultimately caused by changesin the membrane fluidity. Chem. Senses 22: 553–563, 1997.     

Olfaction and odor discrimination are mediated by the C. elegans guanylyl cyclase ODR-1

Animals in complex environments must discriminate between salient and uninformative sensory cues. Caenorhabditis elegans uses one pair of olfactory neurons called AWC to sense many different odorants, yet the animal can distinguish each odorant from the others in discrimination assays. We demonstrate that the transmembrane guanylyl cyclase ODR-1 is essential for responses to all AWC-sensed odorants. ODR-1 appears to be a shared signaling component downstream of odorant receptors. Overexpression of ODR-1 protein indicates that ODR-1 can influence odor discrimination and adaptation as well as olfaction. Adaptation to one odorant, butanone, is disrupted by ODR-1 overexpression. Olfactory discrimination is also disrupted by ODR-1 overexpression, probably by overproduction of the shared second messenger cGMP. We propose that AWC odorant signaling pathways are insulated to permit odor discrimination.     

Response patterns of single neurons in the tortoise olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb

The responses to odor stimulation of 40 single units in the olfactory mucosa and of 18 units in the olfactory bulb of the tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) were recorded with indium-filled, Pt-black-tipped microelectrodes. The test battery consisted of 27 odorants which were proved effective by recording from small bundles of olfactory nerve. Two concentrations of each odorant were employed. These values were adjusted for response magnitudes equal to those for amyl acetate at –2.5 and –3.5 log concentration in olfactory twig recording. Varying concentrations were generated by an injection-type olfactometer. The mucosal responses were exclusively facilitory with a peak frequency of 16 impulses/sec. 19 mucosal units responded to at least one odorant and each unit was sensitive to a limited number of odorants (1–15). The sensitivity pattern of each unit was highly individual, with no clear-cut types, either chemical or qualitative, emerging. Of the 18 olfactory bulb units sampled, all responded to at least one odorant. The maximum frequency observed during a response was 39 impulses/sec. The bulbar neurons can be classified into two types. There are neurons that respond exclusively with facilitation and others that respond with facilitation to some odorants and with inhibition to others. Qualitatively or chemically similar odorants did not generate similar patterns across bulbar units.     

Cross-adaptation between olfactory responses induced by two subgroups of odorant molecules

It has long been believed that vertebrate olfactory signal transduction is mediated by independent multiple pathways (using cAMP and InsP3 as second messengers). However, the dual presence of parallel pathways in the olfactory receptor cell is still controversial, mainly because of the lack of information regarding the single-cell response induced by odorants that have been shown to produce InsP3 exclusively (but not cAMP) in the olfactory cilia. In this study, we recorded activities of transduction channels of single olfactory receptor cells to InsP3-producing odorants. When the membrane potential was held at -54 mV, application of InsP3-producing odorants to the ciliary region caused an inward current. The reversal potential was 0 +/- 7 mV (mean +/- SD, n = 10). Actually, InsP3-producing odorants generated responses in a smaller fraction of cells (lilial, 3.4%; lyral, 1.7%) than the cAMP-producing odorant (cineole, 26%). But, fundamental properties of responses were surprisingly homologous; namely, spatial distribution of the sensitivity, waveforms, I-V relation, and reversal potential, dose dependence, time integration of stimulus period, adaptation, and recovery. By applying both types of odorants alternatively to the same cell, furthermore, we observed cells to exhibit symmetrical cross-adaptation. It seems likely that even with odorants with different modalities adaptation occurs completely depending on the amount of current flow. The data will also provide evidence showing that olfactory response generation and adaptation are regulated by a uniform mechanism for a wide variety of odorants.     

Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process

Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream of gas already flowing through the nose. Of the parameters definable at the naris, temperature, relative humidity, and nature of inert gas had little effect on olfactory responses to amyl acetate, whereas odorant species, odorant concentration, and volume flow rate effectively determined the responses of all nasal chemoreceptors. An intrinsic variable of accessibility to the receptors, particularly olfactory, was demonstrated. Flow dependence of chemoreceptor responses is thought to reflect the necessity for delivery of odorant molecules to receptor sites. Since the olfactory receptors are relatively exposed, plateauing of the response with flow rate for slightly soluble odorants suggests an approach to concentration equilibrium in the overlying mucus with that in the air entering the naris. Accordingly, data for responses to amyl acetate were fitted with Beidler's (1954) taste equation for two kinds of sites being active. The requirement for finite aqueous solubility, if true, suggests substitution of aqueous solutions for gaseous solutions. A suitable medium was found and results conformed to expectations. Olfactory receptors were insensitive to variation of ionic strength, pH, and osmotic pressure.     

Subthreshold olfactory stimulation can enhance sweetness

The impact of olfactory perception on sweetness was explored in a model solution using odorants at subthreshold concentrations. First, the impact of 6 odorants, previously described in the literature as congruent with sweetness, was investigated at suprathreshold level in a sucrose solution. Ethyl butyrate and maltol were selected as they had the highest and the lowest sweetness-enhancing properties, respectively. Second, the impact on sweetness of the 2 odorants was investigated at subthreshold concentrations. A system delivering a continuous liquid flow at the same sucrose level, but with varying odorant concentrations, was used. At a subthreshold level, ethyl butyrate but not maltol significantly enhanced the sweetness of the sucrose solution. This study highlights that olfactory perception induced by odorants at a subthreshold level can significantly modulate taste perception. Finally, contrary to results observed with ethyl butyrate at suprathreshold levels, at subthreshold levels, the intensity of sweetness enhancement was not proportional to ethyl butyrate concentration.     

Odorant-induced hyperpolarization and suppression of cAMP-activated current in newt olfactory receptor neurons

Although many studies have reported that odorants can elicit inhibitory responses as well as excitatory responses in vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons, the cellular mechanisms that underlie this inhibition are unclear. Here we examine the inhibitory effect of odorants on newt olfactory receptor neurons using whole cell patch clamp recording. At high concentrations, odorant stimulation decreased the membrane conductance and inhibited depolarization. Various odorants (anisole, isoamyl acetate, cineole, limonene and isovaleric acid) suppressed the depolarizing current in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, one odorant could suppress the depolarization caused by another odorant. The depolarization caused by isoamyl acetate was inhibited by anisole in cells that were excited by isoamyl acetate but not by anisole. Odorants were able to hyperpolarize cells that were depolarized by cAMP-induced conductance. Given that this inhibitory effect of odorants can affect excitation caused by other odorants, we suggest that it might play a role in coding odorants in olfactory receptor neurons.     

Dissociable codes of odor quality and odorant structure in human piriform cortex

The relationship between odorant structure and odor quality has been a focus of olfactory research for 100 years, although no systematic correlations are yet apparent. Animal studies suggest that topographical representations of odorant structure in olfactory bulb form the perceptual basis of odor quality. Whether central olfactory regions are similarly organized is unclear. Using an olfactory version of fMRI cross-adaptation, we measured neural responses in primary olfactory (piriform) cortex as subjects smelled pairs of odorants systematically differing in quality and molecular functional group (as one critical attribute of odorant structure). Our results indicate a double dissociation in piriform cortex, whereby posterior regions encode quality (but not structure) and anterior regions encode structure (but not quality). The presence of structure-based codes suggests fidelity of sensory information arising from olfactory bulb. In turn, quality-based codes are independent of any simple structural configuration, implying that synthetic mechanisms may underlie our experience of smell.     

Effects of antibodies against odorant binding proteins on electrophysiological responses to odorants

Monoclonal antibodies against two olfactory mucosal proteins, one with affinity for anisole-like and the other for benzaldehyde-like compounds, were applied to mouse olfactory epithelium. Responses to three odorants (anisole, benzaldehyde and amyl acetate) were measured. Of 26 antibodies, three (12%) inhibited responses only to the odorant with affinity for the antigen, nine (35%) inhibited responses to all three odorants, and 14 (54%) were without effect. None reduced responses by as much as 50%. The data support the hypothesis that there is a class of related proteins in olfactory neuronal cell membranes that function as receptor molecules and that other mechanisms also mediate odorant stimulation.     

Internalization of odorant-binding proteins into the mouse olfactory epithelium

The detection of odorants in vertebrates is mediated by chemosensory neurons that reside in the olfactory epithelium of the nose. In land-living species, the hydrophobic odorous compounds inhaled by the airstream are dissolved in the nasal mucus by means of specialized globular proteins, the odorant-binding proteins (OBPs). To assure the responsiveness to odors of each inhalation, a rapid removal of odorants from the microenvironment of the receptor is essential. In order to follow the fate of OBP/odorant complexes, a recombinant OBP was fluorescently labeled, loaded with odorous compounds, and applied to the nose of a mouse. Very quickly, labeled OBP appeared inside the sustentacular cells of the epithelium. This uptake occurred only when the OBP was loaded with appropriate odorant compounds. A search for candidate transporters that could mediate such an uptake process led to the identification of the low density lipoprotein receptor Lrp2/Megalin. In the olfactory epithelium, megalin was found to be specifically expressed in sustentacular cells and the Megalin protein was located in their microvilli. In vitro studies using a cell line that expresses megalin revealed a rapid internalization of OBP/odorant complexes into lysosomes. The uptake was blocked by a Megalin inhibitor, as was the internalization of OBPs into the sustentacular cells of the olfactory epithelium. The results suggest that a Megalin-mediated internalization of OBP/odorant complexes into the sustentacular cells may represent an important mechanism for a rapid and local clearance of odorants.     

A piezoelectric biosensor as an olfactory receptor for odour detection: electronic nose

Humans can detect and differentiate the presence of different odours even at trace levels of these odorous compounds. The odour quantification of any particular samples is normally based on conventional panel decisions. Other analytical instruments could be used to detect trace levels of odorous molecules. This study presents the results of a biological sensor system subject to different odorants. The system consists of a sensor in which the isolated olfactory receptor proteins (ORPs) from bullfrogs (Rana spp.) were coated onto the surface of a piezoelectric (PZ) electrode, similar to the mechanism of human olfaction. The PZ crystal served as a signal transducer. The results indicate rapid (about 400 s), reversible, and longterm (up to 3 months) stable responses to different volatile compounds such as n-caproic acid, isoamyl acetate, n-decyl alcohol, beta-ionone, linalool, and ethyl caporate. The sensitivity of the sensor ranges from 10(-6)-10(-7) g, fully correlated with the olfactory threshold values of human noses. An array of six sensors consisting of five fractionated ORPs and one referenced phospholipid probe is able to respond to different odorants and form a typical fingerprint for each odorant.     

A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition.

The mammalian olfactory system can recognize and discriminate a large number of different odorant molecules. The detection of chemically distinct odorants presumably results from the association of odorous ligands with specific receptors on olfactory sensory neurons. To address the problem of olfactory perception at a molecular level, we have cloned and characterized 18 different members of an extremely large multigene family that encodes seven transmembrane domain proteins whose expression is restricted to the olfactory epithelium. The members of this novel gene family are likely to encode a diverse family of odorant receptors.     

Functional dissection of Odorant binding protein genes in Drosophila melanogaster

Most organisms rely on olfaction for survival and reproduction. The olfactory system of Drosophila melanogaster is one of the best characterized chemosensory systems and serves as a prototype for understanding insect olfaction. Olfaction in Drosophila is mediated by multigene families of odorant receptors and odorant binding proteins (OBPs). Although molecular response profiles of odorant receptors have been well documented, the contributions of OBPs to olfactory behavior remain largely unknown. Here, we used RNAi-mediated suppression of Obp gene expression and measurements of behavioral responses to 16 ecologically relevant odorants to systematically dissect the functions of 17 OBPs. We quantified the effectiveness of RNAi-mediated suppression by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and used a proteomic liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry procedure to show target-specific suppression of OBPs expressed in the antennae. Flies in which expression of a specific OBP is suppressed often show altered behavioral responses to more than one, but not all, odorants, in a sex-dependent manner. Similarly, responses to a specific odorant are frequently affected by suppression of expression of multiple, but not all, OBPs. These results show that OBPs are essential for mediating olfactory behavioral responses and suggest that OBP-dependent odorant recognition is combinatorial.