Dealing with stable structures at ribosome binding sites: bacterial translation and ribosome standby.

Bacterial ribosomes have great difficulties to initiate translation on stable structures within mRNAs. Translational coupling and induced structure changes are strategies to open up inhibitory RNA structures encompassing ribosome binding sites (RBS). There are, however, mRNAs in which stable structures are not unfolded, but that are nevertheless efficiently initiated at high rates. de Smit and van Duin(1) proposed a "ribosome standby" model to theoretically solve this paradox: the 30S ribosome binds nonspecifically to an accessible site on the mRNA (standby site), waiting for a transient opening of a stable RBS hairpin. Upon unfolding, the 30S subunit relocates to form a productive initiation complex. Recent reports have provided experimental support for this model. This review will describe and compare two different flavors of standby sites, their properties, and their likely implications. We also discuss the possibility that ribosome standby may be a more general strategy to obtain high translation rates.     

Binding of 30S Ribosome Induces Single-stranded Conformation Within and Downstream of the Expression Platform in a Translational Riboswitch

Translational riboswitches are bacterial gene regulatory elements found in the 5′-untranslated region of mRNAs. They operate through a conformational refolding reaction that is triggered by a concentration change of a modulating small molecular ligand. The translation initiation region (TIR) is either released from or incorporated into base pairing interactions through the conformational switch. Hence, initiation of translation is regulated by the accessibility of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and start codon. Interaction with the 30S ribosome is indispensable for the structural switch between functional OFF and ON states. However, on a molecular level it is still not fully resolved how the ribosome is accommodated near or at the translation initiation region in the context of translational riboswitches. The standby model of translation initiation postulates a binding site where the mRNA enters the ribosome and where it resides until the initiation site becomes unstructured and accessible. We here investigated the adenine-sensing riboswitch from Vibrio vulnificus. By application of a ¹⁹F labelling strategy for NMR spectroscopy that utilizes ligation techniques to synthesize differentially ¹⁹F labelled riboswitch molecules we show that nucleotides directly downstream of the riboswitch domain are first involved in productive interaction with the 30S ribosomal subunit. Upon the concerted action of ligand and the ribosomal protein rS1 the TIR becomes available and subsequently the 30S ribosome can slide towards the TIR. It will be interesting to see whether this is a general feature in translational riboswitches or if riboswitches exist where this region is structured and represent yet another layer of regulation.     

An antisense RNA inhibits translation by competing with standby ribosomes

Most antisense RNAs in bacteria inhibit translation by competing with ribosomes for translation initiation regions (TIRs) on nascent mRNA. We propose a mechanism by which an antisense RNA inhibits translation without binding directly to a TIR. The tisAB locus encodes an SOS-induced toxin, and IstR-1 is the antisense RNA that counteracts toxicity. We show that full-length tisAB mRNA (+1) is translationally inactive and endonucleolytic processing produces an active mRNA (+42). IstR-1 binding inhibits translation of this mRNA, and subsequent RNase III cleavage generates a truncated, inactive mRNA (+106). In vitro translation, toeprinting, and structure mapping suggest that active, but not inactive, tisAB mRNAs contain an upstream ribosome loading or "standby" site. Standby binding is required for initiation at the highly structured tisB TIR. This may involve ribosome sliding to a transiently open tisB TIR. IstR-1 competes with ribosomes by base pairing to the standby site located approximately 100 nucleotides upstream.     

HCV IRES domain IIb affects the configuration of coding RNA in the 40S subunit's decoding groove

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) uses a structured internal ribosome entry site (IRES) RNA to recruit the translation machinery to the viral RNA and begin protein synthesis without the ribosomal scanning process required for canonical translation initiation. Different IRES structural domains are used in this process, which begins with direct binding of the 40S ribosomal subunit to the IRES RNA and involves specific manipulation of the translational machinery. We have found that upon initial 40S subunit binding, the stem–loop domain of the IRES that contains the start codon unwinds and adopts a stable configuration within the subunit''s decoding groove. This configuration depends on the sequence and structure of a different stem–loop domain (domain IIb) located far from the start codon in sequence, but spatially proximal in the IRES•40S complex. Mutation of domain IIb results in misconfiguration of the HCV RNA in the decoding groove that includes changes in the placement of the AUG start codon, and a substantial decrease in the ability of the IRES to initiate translation. Our results show that two distal regions of the IRES are structurally communicating at the initial step of 40S subunit binding and suggest that this is an important step in driving protein synthesis.     

Escherichia coli Ribosomal Protein S1 Unfolds Structured mRNAs Onto the Ribosome for Active Translation Initiation

Regulation of translation initiation is well appropriate to adapt cell growth in response to stress and environmental changes. Many bacterial mRNAs adopt structures in their 5′ untranslated regions that modulate the accessibility of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Structured mRNAs interact with the 30S in a two-step process where the docking of a folded mRNA precedes an accommodation step. Here, we used a combination of experimental approaches in vitro (kinetic of mRNA unfolding and binding experiments to analyze mRNA–protein or mRNA–ribosome complexes, toeprinting assays to follow the formation of ribosomal initiation complexes) and in vivo (genetic) to monitor the action of ribosomal protein S1 on the initiation of structured and regulated mRNAs. We demonstrate that r-protein S1 endows the 30S with an RNA chaperone activity that is essential for the docking and the unfolding of structured mRNAs, and for the correct positioning of the initiation codon inside the decoding channel. The first three OB-fold domains of S1 retain all its activities (mRNA and 30S binding, RNA melting activity) on the 30S subunit. S1 is not required for all mRNAs and acts differently on mRNAs according to the signals present at their 5′ ends. This work shows that S1 confers to the ribosome dynamic properties to initiate translation of a large set of mRNAs with diverse structural features.     

Tombusvirus recruitment of host translational machinery via the 3′ UTR

RNA viruses recruit the host translational machinery by different mechanisms that depend partly on the structure of their genomes. In this regard, the plus-strand RNA genomes of several different pathogenic plant viruses do not contain traditional translation-stimulating elements, i.e., a 5′-cap structure and a 3′-poly(A) tail, and instead rely on a 3′-cap-independent translational enhancer (3′CITE) located in their 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) for efficient synthesis of viral proteins. We investigated the structure and function of the I-shaped class of 3′CITE in tombusviruses—also present in aureusviruses and carmoviruses—using biochemical and molecular approaches and we determined that it adopts a complex higher-order RNA structure that facilitates translation by binding simultaneously to both eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4F and the 5′ UTR of the viral genome. The specificity of 3′CITE binding to eIF4F is mediated, at least in part, through a direct interaction with its eIF4E subunit, whereas its association with the viral 5′ UTR relies on complementary RNA–RNA base-pairing. We show for the first time that this tripartite 5′ UTR/3′CITE/eIF4F complex forms in vitro in a translationally relevant environment and is required for recruitment of ribosomes to the 5′ end of the viral RNA genome by a mechanism that shares some fundamental features with cap-dependent translation. Notably, our results demonstrate that the 3′CITE facilitates the initiation step of translation and validate a molecular model that has been proposed to explain how several different classes of 3′CITE function. Moreover, the virus–host interplay defined in this study provides insights into natural host resistance mechanisms that have been linked to 3′CITE activity.     

Role of premature translational termination in the regulation of expression of the phi X174 lysis gene

Expression of the phi X174 lysis (E) gene, a member of an overlapping gene pair, appears to depend on a frameshift-induced chain termination by ribosomes translating the upstream D gene. A -1 reading frameshift, possibly induced by misreading of an alanine codon as a doublet, causes ribosomes to terminate translation at two different sites, suggesting two modes of regulating expression of the E gene. One frameshift can cause translational termination at a stop codon(s) near the E gene ribosome binding site (RBS), resulting in reinitiation by ribosomes at the E gene RBS. Termination at a second site some 70 bases upstream from the E gene RBS, while too far away to allow ribosomal re-initiation at the E gene RBS, probably results in an unmasking of the message, allowing entry of a new ribosome at the E gene RBS.     

An mRNA-rRNA base-pairing mechanism for translation initiation in eukaryotes

Base-pairing of messenger RNA to ribosomal RNA is a mechanism of translation initiation in prokaryotes. Although analogous base-pairing has been suggested to affect the translation of various eukaryotic mRNAs, direct evidence has been lacking. To test such base-pairing, we developed a yeast system that uses ribosomes containing a mouse-yeast hybrid 18S rRNA. Using this system, we demonstrate that a 9-nucleotide element found in the mouse Gtx homeodomain mRNA facilitates translation initiation by base-pairing to 18S rRNA. Various point mutations in the Gtx element and in either the hybrid or wild-type yeast 18S rRNAs confirmed the requirement for an intact complementary match. The presence of the Gtx element in various mRNAs suggests that this element affects the translation of groups of mRNAs. We discuss the possibility that other mRNA elements affect translation by base-pairing to different sites in the 18S rRNA.     

Translation initiation by factor-independent binding of eukaryotic ribosomes to internal ribosomal entry sites

Two exceptional mechanisms of eukaryotic translation initiation have recently been identified that differ fundamentally from the canonical factor-mediated, end-dependent mechanism of ribosomal attachment to mRNA. Instead, ribosomal 40S subunits bind in a factor-independent manner to the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) in an mRNA. These two mechanisms are exemplified by initiation on the unrelated approximately 300 nt.-long Hepatitis C virus (HCV) IRES and the approximately 200 nt.-long cricket paralysis virus (CrPV) intergenic region (IGR) IRES, respectively. Ribosomal binding involves interaction with multiple non-contiguous sites on these IRESs, and therefore also differs from the factor-independent attachment of prokaryotic ribosomes to mRNA, which involves base-pairing to the linear Shine-Dalgarno sequence. The HCV IRES binds to the solvent side of the 40S subunit, docks a domain of the IRES into the ribosomal exit (E) site and places the initiation codon in the ribosomal peptidyl (P) site. Subsequent binding of eIF3 and the eIF2-GTP/initiator tRNA complex to form a 48S complex is followed by subunit joining to form an 80S ribosome. The CrPV IRES binds to ribosomes in a very different manner, by occupying the ribosomal E and P sites in the intersubunit cavity, thereby excluding initiator tRNA. Ribosomes enter the elongation stage of translation directly, without any involvement of initiator tRNA or initiation factors, following recruitment of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal aminoacyl (A) site and translocation of it to the P site.     

Evidence for a Competitive-Displacement Model for the initiation of protein synthesis involving the intermolecular hybridization of 5 S rRNA, 18 S rRNA and mRNA.

We have previously shown that a 5'-terminal region of mouse 5 S rRNA can base-pair in vitro with two distinct regions of 18 S rRNA. Further analysis reveals that these 5 S rRNA-complementary sequences in 18 S rRNA also exhibit complementarity to the Kozak consensus sequence surrounding the mRNA translational start site. To test the possibility that these 2 regions in 18 S rRNA may be involved in mRNA binding and translational initiation, we have tested, using an in vitro translation system, the effects of DNA oligonucleotides complementary to these 18 S rRNA sequences on protein synthesis. Results show that an oligonucleotide complementary to one 18 S rRNA region does inhibit translation at the step of initiation. We propose a Competitive-Displacement Model for the initiation of translation involving the intermolecular base-pairing of 5 S rRNA, 18 S rRNA and mRNA.     

Mechanism of ribosome recruitment by hepatitis C IRES RNA

Many viruses and certain cellular mRNAs initiate protein synthesis from a highly structured RNA sequence in the 5' untranslated region, called the internal ribosome entry site (IRES). In hepatitis C virus (HCV), the IRES RNA functionally replaces several large initiation factor proteins by directly recruiting the 43S particle. Using quantitative binding assays, modification interference of binding, and chemical and enzymatic footprinting experiments, we show that three independently folded tertiary structural domains in the IRES RNA make intimate contacts to two purified components of the 43S particle: the 40S ribosomal subunit and eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3). We measure the affinity and demonstrate the specificity of these interactions for the first time and show that the high affinity interaction of IRES RNA with the 40S subunit drives formation of the IRES RNA-40S-eIF3 ternary complex. Thus, the HCV IRES RNA recruits 43S particles in a mode distinct from both eukaryotic cap-dependent and prokaryotic ribosome recruitment strategies, and is architecturally and functionally unique from other large folded RNAs that have been characterized to date.     

RNA stem-loop enhanced expression of previously non-expressible genes

The key step in bacterial translation is formation of the pre-initiation complex. This requires initial contacts between mRNA, fMet-tRNA and the 30S subunit of the ribosome, steps that limit the initiation of translation. Here we report a method for improving translational initiation, which allows expression of several previously non-expressible genes. This method has potential applications in heterologous protein synthesis and high-throughput expression systems. We introduced a synthetic RNA stem-loop (stem length, 7 bp; DeltaG(0) = -9.9 kcal/mol) in front of various gene sequences. In each case, the stem-loop was inserted 15 nt downstream from the start codon. Insertion of the stem-loop allowed in vitro expression of five previously non-expressible genes and enhanced the expression of all other genes investigated. Analysis of the RNA structure proved that the stem-loop was formed in vitro, and demonstrated that stabilization of the ribosome binding site is due to stem-loop introduction. By theoretical RNA structure analysis we showed that the inserted RNA stem-loop suppresses long-range interactions between the translation initiation domain and gene-specific mRNA sequences. Thus the inserted RNA stem-loop supports the formation of a separate translational initiation domain, which is more accessible to ribosome binding.     

Characterization of ribosome binding on Rous sarcoma virus RNA in vitro.

We determined the sites at which ribosomes form initiation complexes on Rous sarcoma virus RNA in order to determine how initiation of Pr76gag synthesis at the fourth AUG codon from the 5' end of Rous sarcoma virus strain SR-A RNA occurs. Ribosomes bind almost exclusively at the 5'-proximal AUG codon when chloride is present as the major anion added to the translational system. However, when chloride is replaced with acetate, ribosomes bind at the two 5'-proximal AUG codons, as well as at the initiation site for Pr76gag. We confirmed that the 5'-proximal AUG codon is part of a functional initiation site by identifying the seven-amino acid peptide encoded there. Our results suggest that (i) translation in vitro of Rous sarcoma virus virion RNA results in the synthesis of at least two polypeptides; (ii) the pattern of ribosome binding observed for Rous sarcoma virus RNA can be accounted for by the modified scanning hypothesis; and (iii) the interaction between 40S ribosomal subunits or 80S ribosomal complexes is stronger at the 5'-proximal AUG codon than at sites farther downstream, including the initiation site for the major viral proteins.     

GTP-independent tRNA Delivery to the Ribosomal P-site by a Novel Eukaryotic Translation Factor

During translation, aminoacyl-tRNAs are delivered to the ribosome by specialized GTPases called translation factors. Here, we report the tRNA binding to the P-site of 40 S ribosomes by a novel GTP-independent factor eIF2D isolated from mammalian cells. The binding of tRNA_i^Met occurs after the AUG codon finds its position in the P-site of 40 S ribosomes, the situation that takes place during initiation complex formation on the hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site or on some other specific RNAs (leaderless mRNA and A-rich mRNAs with relaxed scanning dependence). Its activity in tRNA binding with 40 S subunits does not require the presence of the aminoacyl moiety. Moreover, the factor possesses the unique ability to deliver non-Met (elongator) tRNAs into the P-site of the 40 S subunit. The corresponding gene is found in all eukaryotes and includes an SUI1 domain present also in translation initiation factor eIF1. The versatility of translation initiation strategies in eukaryotes is discussed.     

A translation-like cycle is a quality control checkpoint for maturing 40S ribosome subunits

Assembly factors (AFs) prevent premature translation initiation on small (40S) ribosomal subunit assembly intermediates by blocking ligand binding. However, it is unclear how AFs are displaced from maturing 40S ribosomes, if or how maturing subunits are assessed for fidelity, and what prevents premature translation initiation once AFs dissociate. Here we show that maturation involves a translation-like cycle whereby the translation factor eIF5B, a GTPase, promotes joining of large (60S) subunits with pre-40S subunits to give 80S-like complexes, which are subsequently disassembled by the termination factor Rli1, an ATPase. The AFs Tsr1 and Rio2 block the mRNA channel and initiator tRNA binding site, and therefore 80S-like ribosomes lack mRNA or initiator tRNA. After Tsr1 and Rio2 dissociate from 80S-like complexes Rli1-directed displacement of 60S subunits allows for translation initiation. This cycle thus provides a functional test of 60S subunit binding and the GTPase site before ribosomes enter the translating pool.     

Functional importance of RNA interactions in selection of translation initiation codons

RNA base pairing between the initiation codon and anticodon loop of initiator tRNA is essential but not sufficient for the selection of the 'correct' mRNA translational start site by ribosomes. In prokaryotes, additional RNA interactions between small ribosomal subunit RNA and mRNA sequences just upstream of the start codon can efficiently direct the ribosome to the initiation site. Although there is presently no proof for a similar important ribosomal RNA interaction in eukaryotes, the 5' non-coding regions of their mRNAs and 'consensus sequences' surrounding initiation codons have been shown to be strong determinants for initiation-site selection, but the exact mechanisms are not yet understood. Intramolecular base pairing in mRNA and participation of translation initiation factors can strongly influence the formation of mRNA–small ribosomal subunit–initiator tRNA complexes and modulate translational activities in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Only recently has it been appreciated that alternative mechanisms may also contribute to the selection of initiation codons in all organisms. Although direct proof is currently lacking, there is accumulating evidence that additional cis -acting mRNA elements and trans -acting proteins may form specific 'bridging' interactions with ribosomes during translation initiation.