Performance of the AutoPap Primary Screening System in the detection of high-risk cases in cervicovaginal smears

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the AutoPap Primary Screening System (APSS) (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) for the detection of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 14,779 consecutive conventional Pap smears were processed by the APSS. All slides designated as "Review" by the device were manually screened according to the Bethesda System. The ranking scores obtained from the device were compared with the cytologic interpretations in all cases and with the final histologic diagnoses in the cases with cytologic severe abnormalities. RESULTS: The device classified 10,349 slides as Review (78%) and 2,912 (22%) as "No Further Review." In the 78% Review cases, the samples were ranked in descending order of potential abnormality, broken into quintiles. The correlation between the slide quintile ranks and the manual cytologic diagnosis indicated that 90% of abnormal smears were categorized by the device as in the first and second quintile rank, and the correlation between the rank report of the device and the histologic diagnosis showed that all cases of HSIL or invasive carcinoma were in the top two ranks. No significant abnormalities were observed in any of the smears categorized as No Further Review. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the effectiveness of APSS for the detection of Pap smears with severe abnormalities.     

Evaluation of the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical cytopathology laboratory

OBJECTIVE: To compare the AutoCyte SCREEN (AutoCyte, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) system with manual screening by experienced cytotechnologists using thin-layer preparations that had been previously extensively studied and their cytologic abnormalities well defined. STUDY DESIGN: AutoCyte PREP (AutoCyte) samples prepared for a previous split-sample study comparing thin-layer preparations to conventional smears were used. These 1,992 AutoCyte PREP samples were in a cohort the abnormal findings of which had been confirmed via independent review by two sets of pathologists. For the current study, these samples were remasked and evaluated by the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical laboratory. The instrument scanned each slide and selected six overview fields and 120 single objects for storage and display. The computer classified each slide in one of the following categories: abnormal, uncertain, normal or unsatisfactory. Independently for each case, a cytotechnologist evaluated the six fields and 120 objects selected by the instrument as abnormal, normal or unsatisfactory. For those cases classified as uncertain by AutoCyte, the technologist then reexamined the cellular displays and entered a consensus classification. These results were then compared to those of an independent review by cytotechnologists of the identical set of slides using routine manual screening. RESULTS: The AutoCyte SCREEN selected 35% of slides for manual review. Technologist and computer rendered equivalent classifications in 79%. Of the total slides screened by the AutoCyte SCREEN, 57% were classified as "uncertain," and 88% of these were subsequently classified as normal by consensus. Using the well-defined abnormal values of the cellular sample as a basis for calculation, the AutoCyte SCREEN-assisted practice had a diagnostic sensitivity of 85% and diagnostic specificity of 97.6%. Comparable values for manual screening of the identical cellular sample were a diagnostic sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 97.4%. CONCLUSION: The AutoCyte SCREEN achieves comparable or greater sensitivity in detecting cervical abnormalities in comparison with manual screening. When combined with the substantial advantage of thin-layer preparations over conventional smears, the AutoCyte SCREEN provides a screening system of superior sensitivity over conventionally prepared and examined cervical smears.     

Comparison of TriPath thin-layer technology with conventional methods on nongynecologic specimens

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of the TriPath PREP (previously called AutoCyte) TriPath Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in nongynecologic cytologic material by performing side-by-side comparison of conventional preparations with TriPath-prepared slides. STUDY DESIGN: An initial study of 613 cases (set A) was conducted to compare the TriPath PREP system with conventional methods for the evaluation of nongynecologic specimens, including urine, body cavity effusions, cerebrospinal fluid, pulmonary and gastrointestinal specimens. Paired cases were evaluated for cellularity, staining quality, preservation and representation of diagnostic material. Subsequent changes in the automated technique warranted reevaluation of the TriPath method. The follow-up study of 259 cases (set B) was conducted with the same design as set A. Results of evaluated parameters were analyzed using the chi 2 test. RESULTS: Results of the two sets were strikingly different. Prior to technical changes made by the laboratory, the TriPath method was significantly inferior. In the second set, the preferred material was most commonly the TriPath-prepared material. In particular, the majority of urine samples were prepared better by the automated, thin-layer system. CONCLUSION: The TriPath PREP system offers a reliable preparation of urine and has potential for other nongynecologic specimens, provided that careful attention is paid to technical details and some adjustments are made to account for specimen variability.     

Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.     

Evaluation of a centrifuge method and thin-layer preparation in urine cytology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the quality and cost of urine cytology using the Cytospin method (Shandon, ThermoElectron Corporation, Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A.) and the AutoCyte PREP (TriPath Imaging, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in a general laboratory. STUDY DESIGN: A study of differences between the Cytospin method and AutoCyte PREP in the areas of specimen preparation, staining, number and quality of diagnostic cells, background, screener preference, and cost was undertaken over a 3-month period in 2000. Sixty fresh voided urine samples from 25 patients with known transitional cell carcinoma were prepared by the Cytospin method and the AutoCyte PREP according to the manufacturers' instructions. RESULTS: The Cytospin method had longer preparation time but shorter screening time than the AutoCyte PREP. The number of diagnostic cells was higher in the Cytospin method. Fixation quality and staining clarity were better in the Cytospin method. Qualitative assessment of cell arrangements, cell and nuclear size and shape, nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear membrane irregularity showed no significant differences between the 2 methods. Cellular details and nuclear chromatin patterns were clearer and better preserved in the Cytospin method, but the AutoCyte PREP showed less blood and inflammatory cells and debris. CONCLUSION: In the majority of cases the screeners preferred the Cytospin method due to its better overall cytologic quality. However, the amount of blood, inflammation and debris was much lower in the AutoCyte PREP. This reduced the need to make a second, diluted specimen and made turnaround time faster. The AutoCyte PREP was 7 times more expensive than the Cytospin method.     

Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of the Focal-Point slide profiler (TriPath Care Technologies, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) in determing the absence of endocervical cells in conventional Pap smear slides. STUDY DESIGN: A consecutive series of conventional Pap smears, designated by FocalPoint as requiring no further review (NFR) and as lacking endocervical cells, was manually screened to determine the true presence or absence of endocervical cells. These results were compared to those obtained by FocalPoint. RESULTS: From January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2001, FocalPoint indicated that 797 NFR slides did not contain endocervical cells. In contrast, manual screening revealed that 504/797 (63.2%) did contain endocervical cells. CONCLUSION: The reliability of a negative FocalPoint determination for endocervical cells is limited. Manual screening of NFR slides designated by the instrument as lacking endocervical cells appears to be necessary.     

Evaluation of thin-layer methods in urine cytology

Conventional cytospin smears prepared from urinary tract specimens were compared with two new thin layer techniques, i.e. ThinPrep and AutoCyte PREP. Cellularity, cell preservation, background features, detection rate, screening time and ease of preparation were evaluated. Thin-layer techniques when applied to urine cytology were found to improve cell yield and cell preservation, and reduce background artefact. The reporting rate for abnormal urothelial cells was comparable to conventional cytospin smears, as was screening time. Laboratory staff found the methodologies to be practicable and easily incorporated into a large routine diagnostic service. We conclude that a one-slide thin-layer urine preparation is comparable to four cytospin slides in the detection of urothelial abnormalities, and that both ThinPrep and AutoCyte PREP have comparable features.     

Sensitivity studies of AutoPap System Location-Guided Screening of cervical-vaginal cytologic smears.

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of a study that assessed the efficacy of a cervical cytology screening method utilizing the AutoPap System with Location-Guided Screening (AutoPap LGS) software for detecting abnormal Papanicolaou smear slides. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred cases of abnormal cervical and vaginal smears were selected from the recent archives of the Taipei Institute of Pathology. For each abnormal slide, a matched "within normal limit" slide was included in the study. The slides were processed on the AutoPap Primary Screening System to select slides for Review or No Review and identify areas of the Review slides for human review and diagnosis (AutoPap LGS). The effectiveness of AutoPap LGS for detecting abnormal Papanicolaou smear slides was evaluated at multiple No Review rates. RESULTS: The AutoPap LGS demonstrated statistically superior sensitivity over current laboratory practice for the identification of abnormal slides. Assessing the potential benefit of the AutoPap LGS using a projection method, it is expected that the AutoPap LGS would detect an additional 52 low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and 13 high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cases missed by current laboratory practice in a population of 2,860 cases. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of AutoPap LGS was demonstrated by its statistically superior performance in the detection of missed abnormal slides as compared to current laboratory practice at the Taipei Institute of Pathology.     

Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology. A morphologic study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphologic characteristics of gynecologic samples prepared by 3 different methods of liquid-based cytology. STUDY DESIGN: Cytologic samples from representative cases of each diagnostic category of squamous epithelial lesion, prepared by automated and manual liquid-based systems, were analyzed by 3 laboratories in the United States, Portugal and Brazil. The systems included: ThinPrep (automated, U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved; Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A.), Autocyte PREP (South American system, manual; TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) and DNACITOLIQ (manual; Digene Brazil, S?o Paulo, Brazil). A panel of 16 morphologic parameters was evaluated: cellularity, clean background, uniform distribution, artifacts, cellular overlapping, architectural and cytoplasmic distortion, cytoplasmic vacuolization, cellular elongation, imprecise cytoplasmic borders, folded cytoplasmic borders, nuclear hyperchromasia, coarse chromatin, prominent nucleolus, irregular nuclear borders, atypical mitosis and inflammatory infiltrate. Negative, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cases were included. Cases without biopsies were confirmed by consensus. RESULTS: Cellularity was adequate in all samples. Clean background was observed in the vast majority of samples with all liquid-based systems. Uniform distribution was frequently found in ThinPrep and Autocyte PREP samples but not in DNACITOLIQ. Artifacts were not present in DNACITOLIQ samples, rare in ThinPrep and observed in 8 (34.7%) Autocyte PREP. Cellular overlapping was observed in all 3 system samples: 11 (31.42%) cases in ThinPrep, 16 (69.56%) in Autocyte PREP and 17 (68%) in DNACITOLIQ System. Architectural and cytoplasmic distortion were present in 3 cases of HSIL (13%) and cytoplasmic vacuolization in 2 cases of LSIL and 1 HSIL of Autocyte PREP. Cellular elongation was found in 13 (56.5%) Autocyte PREP and in 5 (20%) DNACITOLIQ samples. Inflammatory infiltrate was found in all 3 system samples but with more frequency in the Autocyte PREP (69.56%) and DNACITOLIQ System (72%). CONCLUSION: This study clearly indicated that in spite of the different methodologies, the 3 methods adequately preserved cellular structure for morphologic evaluation. The choice of method will depend on price, availability and procedures involved.     

Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of both screening and diagnosis in a liquid-based cervical sample. STUDY DESIGN: SurePath samples (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with known diagnoses were selected, including 18 negative, 16 low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and 12 high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cases. Through a serial dilution technique, samples of varying cellularity were prepared. The 275 slides were assigned random numbers and were routinely screened by 1 of 2 senior cytotechnologists, blinded to the reference diagnosis. Specimens with a screening diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or higher were reviewed by two pathologists, resulting in a final consensus diagnosis. Using a grid counting system, cellularity was determined for each slide. RESULTS: There was a clear demarcation in sensitivity between specimens with a cellularity of < 5,000 or > or = 5,000 squamous cells. This applied to both the sensitivity for screening and to the final consensus diagnosis. For cases with a reference diagnosis of LSIL+, at a cytotechnologist screening level of ASCUS or greater, sensitivity increased from 72.8% (< 5,000 cells) to 98.1% (> or = 5,000 cells) and for a reference diagnosis of HSIL from 85.7% to 100%, respectively. Similarly, for the consensus diagnosis, sensitivity rose from 78.5% (< 5,000 cells) to 96.6% (> or = 5,000 cells) for LSIL+ and from 82.9% to 100%, respectively, for HSIL. These differences were statistically significant (P < .001). CONCLUSION: A minimum cellularity of 5,000 squamous cells is recommended for SurePath liquid-based cervical preparations.     

Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices

OBJECTIVE: To examine cells that were retained on sampling devices used to collect ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp., Boxborough, Massachusetts, U.S.A) Pap smears in order to evaluate both the number and significance of cells that are routinely discarded with these devices after liquid-based specimens are collected. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred Pap smears from 100 women were prospectively procured after gynecologic Pap smears were collected for the ThinPrep Pap test. The sampling end of the collection devices was cut off and placed in a vial that contained SUREPATH preservative fluid (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A). The residual cell samples were processed using the SurePath PREPSTAIN slide processor (TriPath). A single liquid-based slide was prepared from the sampling devices from each of the 100 specimens collected. The slides produced from the discarded devices were reviewed for the following: squamous cells, endocervical component, epithelial cell abnormalities and miscellaneous findings. The slides prepared from the "throw-away" (TA) material were subsequently compared with the primary ThinPrep Pap smear slide. RESULTS: Twenty-five percent of the TA samples had an equal or greater number of squamous cells per high-power microscopic field when compared to the primary ThinPrep slide, with 8% of the TA slides demonstrating greater overall cellularity. An endocervical component was present on 27 of 66 cervical samples (40.9%). Three of five cases (60%) interpreted as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance had similar cells on the TA slides. Two cases of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance had no abnormal cells on the TA slides. Twelve of 14 cases (85.71%) of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion contained similar cells on the TA slides. Two of four cases (50%) of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion also had similar abnormal cells on the TA slides. Miscellaneous findings included 1 case of benign endometrial cells and 4 Candida infections present on both preparations, along with 1 case of Trichomonas vaginalis organisms present on the ThinPrep slide only. In 1 specimen, several multinucleated histiocytic giant cells were present only on the TA slide. CONCLUSIONS: Specimens prepared from TA collecting devices used for the ThinPrep Pap test are less sensitive than the primary specimen for the detection of cervical lesions. This is in contrast to split-sample studies involving ThinPrep and conventional smears. Our study documented the presence of normal and abnormal cells discarded from ThinPrep sampling devices in a high percentage of cases. Discarded abnormal cells on the TA slides were, however, few when compared to the primary specimen, with only 1 exception involving a high grade lesion.     

Processing liquid-based gynecologic specimens: comparison of the available techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a cytopreparation protocol suitable for satisfactory processing by the AutoCyte PREP System with the gynecologic specimens collected in PreservCyt fluid for the ThinPrep machine. STUDY DESIGN: The residue of a number of gynecologic specimens collected in PreservCyt and processed by ThinPrep were processed by AutoCyte PREP. Some modifications were made in the cytopreparatory protocol in order to obtain satisfactory specimens. RESULTS: The ThinPrep and AutoCyte PREP specimens were examined independently. The results were comparable, with a high degree of concordance between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Gynecologic specimens collected in PreservCyt and following the ThinPrep specimen collection protocol can be processed using the AutoCyte PREP System. Minor protocol modifications provided comparable diagnostic material. Additional studies are needed to explore the feasibility of this approach and fulfill the various U.S. regulatory agency requirements for the liquid-based Pap test.     

Fine needle aspiration cytology of lymph node: experience of 2 university hospitals with conventional smears and liquid-based cytology

OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 different series of fine needle aspirations (FNA) performed by conventional smears (CS) and liquid-based cytology (TriPath PREP). STUDY DESIGN: From January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2005, we selected 139 FNA samples of lymph node, if the diagnosis was histologically proven after the initial cytologic diagnosis. Samples came from 2 university hospitals from Brussels: UZ-Brussel (n=96) using liquid-based cytology (LBC) and Hospital Erasme ULB (n=43) using CS. RESULTS: The number of inadequate samples was greater for LBC than CS, but there was no statistical difference (17.7% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.059). No differences were found between LBC and CS in sensitivity (respectively, 85.0% vs. 85.2%), specificity (84.2% vs. 85.7%) and efficiency (84.8% vs. 85.4%). CONCLUSION: Despite the cost, the efficiency of lymph node FNA cytology is identical between the CS and LBC performed by the TriPath PREP system. The quality of the smears, both LBC and CS, depends mainly on practitioner dexterity. Nevertheless, one advantage of LBC is that it provides an ancillary technique to improve FNAC diagnosis. In the future, a combination of these technologies with FNAC alone could in some cases take the place of surgical lymph node excision.     

Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the conventional Pap test and liquid-based cytology (LBC) in an ongoing multicenter trial testing optional screening tools (cytology, screening colposcopy, visual inspection with acetic acid, visual inspection with Lugol's Iodine, cervicography and Hybrid Capture II [HCII] (Digene Brazil, S?o Paulo, Brazil) conventional and self-sampling), for cervical cancer in Brazil and Argentina. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 12,107 women attending four clinics (Campinas, S?o Paulo, Porto Alegre, Buenos Aires) were randomized into the 8 diagnostic arms. Women testing positive with any of the tests were referred for colposcopy, and cervical biopsies were used as the gold standard to assess performance characteristics of the diagnostic tests. Conventional Pap smears were sampled by all clinics (n = 10,240), and LBC (Autocyte PREP, [TriPath Imaging, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.], n=320, and DNA-Citoliq [Digene Brazil], n =1,346) was performed by 1 of the clinics. RESULTS: Conventional Pap smears showed no squamous intraepithelial lesions (normal) in 8,946 (87.4%) and LBC in 1,373 (82.4%). Using high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) as the cutoff, Pap smears predicted high grade (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 3) with OR 63.0 (95% CI, 36.90-107.70), standard error (SE) 59%, SP 97.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) 68.1% and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.7%. The same figures for Autocyte PREP were: OR 9.0 (95% CI, 2.43-33.24), sensitivity (SE) 33.3%, specificity (SP) 100%, PPV 100% and negative PV (NPV) 88.8%. DNA-Citoliq detected CIN 3 as follows: OR 11.8 (95% CI 2.60-53.26), SE 40.0%, SP 94.6%, PPV 40.0% and NPV 94.6%. Lowering the cutoff to low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions increased SE and NPV but compromised SP and PPV. The detection rates for high grade lesions after an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance diagnosis were similar with the 3 techniques. In our settings, the 3 methods of cervical cytology were slightly different in performance. The conventional Pap smear had the highest SE, while Autocyte PREP had 100% SP and PPV in detecting CIN3 with the HSIL cutoff. All 3 tests had lower SE but higher SP as compared to HCII.     

Applicability of liquid-based cytology to the assessment of DNA content in cervical lesions using static cytometry

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the nuclear DNA content of cervical lesions in liquid-based cytologic specimens prepared for static cytometry. STUDY DESIGN: The DNA content of cervical lesions was evaluated in cervical samples prepared with the Autocyte PREP liquid-based cytology system (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.). A series of 47 samples stained with the Papanicolaou method (chronic cervicitis, n = 15; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 1, n = 25; CIN 2, n = 5; CIN 3, n = 2) were collected from consecutive women enrolled in an ongoing screening study at Leonor Mendes de Barros Hospital, S?o Paulo, Brazil, in 2002. Each residual sample was processed according to the Feulgen-thionin method (TriPath Imaging). Ploidy evaluation was performed using the CAS 200 image analysis system and Quantitative DNA Measurement software 3.0 (version 8.1) (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, Califoria, U.S.A.). Cellular ploidy was analyzed from atypical nuclei, and the DNA index was obtained using histograms for interpretation. RESULTS: All chronic cervicitis cases were diploid. Of the CIN 1 cases, 44% were diploid, 12% tetraploid, 32% aneuploid and 12% polyploid (diploid plus tetraploid). CIN 2 lesions were diploid in 60% and aneuploid in 40% of cases, whereas all CIN 3 lesions (100%) were aneuploid. CONCLUSION: The liquid-based cytologic samples proved to be suitable and highly useful for DNA analysis by image cytometry, which was capable of discriminating CIN 3 lesions from CIN 1 and 2 but not CIN 1 from 2 lesions. Aneuploidy was closely associated with CIN 3 lesions.     

Evaluation of the FocalPoint GS system performance in an Italian population-based screening of cervical abnormalities

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the FocalPoint Location-Guided Screening (FPGS) performance in computer-assisted primary screening of Papanicolaou-stained cervicovaginal smears. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 37,306 routine consecutive conventional Pap slides were prospectively processed on the FPGS. Each slid designated by the instrument as Review was reported according to results obtained using a GS Review Station. Subsequently, all slides under went conventional manual rapid screening and reported results were compared. RESULTS: Of the slides initially submitted to the FPGS, 34,004 (91.15%) were qualified for scanning. Within these slides, the system classified 7,399 (21.8%) as needing No Further Review and ranked to Review the remaining 26,605 (78.2%). Of the 418 cellular abnormalities found, 409 were classified for Review by FPGS and 9 minor grade lesions were classified in the "No Further Review" population. Overall, 352 (86%) of atypical squamous cell (ASC)+ were ranked in high-score quintiles, including 96 (94%) of the 102 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse. Location-guided software identified cellular abnormalities, in the automatically selected fields of view, in 378 (92%) of the ranked abnormal slides, showing a sensitivity > 95% on SILs. CONCLUSION: Slide ranking and location-guided screening features are of value in detecting and triaging abnormal smears.     

Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the qualification of a Pap smear classified as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) favor reactive or neoplasia as recommended by the Bethesda System. STUDY DESIGN: The smears from 105 concurrent patients with a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS not otherwise qualified were reviewed and subclassified as ASCUS favor reactive, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) based on the Bethesda System criteria. The cervical biopsy diagnoses were correlated. RESULTS: Of the 105 cases classified as ASCUS, 37 were subclassified as favor reactive, 51 as favor LSIL and 17 as favor HSIL on cytologic review. In the ASCUS favor reactive group, 19 (51%) had reactive changes on biopsy, 17 (46%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, and 1 (2%) had CIN 3. A total of 48% patients had CIN. In the favor LSIL group, there was CIN 1 in 28 cases (55%), CIN 2 or 3 in 12 (23%) and benign changes in 11 (22%) on biopsy. Seventy-eight percent had CIN. In the 17 cases classified as ASCUS favor HSIL group, all had CIN. CONCLUSION: Of the total 105 cases of ASCUS, 71% had CIN, 29% had reactive changes on follow-up biopsies, and 48% of patients in the ASCUS favor reactive group had CIN. Qualifiers of ASCUS have questionable utility in patient management.     

Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Cytologic predictive value for glandular involvement in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

OBJECTIVE: To verify the cytologic predictive value of a diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) cases. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective study, 98 cases of HSIL were reviewed. All patients were referred for colposcopy and directed biopsy to confirm the cytologic diagnoses. Loop excision of the transformation zone was performed to treat clinical lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were evaluated. Kappa statistics and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the findings statistically. RESULTS: By logistic regression analysis, we found that the chance of finding squamous intraepithelial lesions involving glands in AGUS smears was 5.32 times higher than in those with no AGUS. It was 5.74 times higher in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 lesions than in CIN 2. CONCLUSION: The cytologic predictive value for HSIL involving glands is statistically significant when specific and objective criteria are used for the AGUS diagnosis.     

100% rapid rescreening for quality assurance in a quality control program in a public health cytologic laboratory

OBJECTIVE: To verij5 the efficacy of the quality control (QC) program in a cytologic laboratwy with a rapid rescreening (RR) protocol. STUDY DESIGN: RR, according to the Turret RR method, of all samples initially screened as negative at the Laboratory of Cytology, Adolfo Lutz Institute, was performed. The slides were reviewed for 60 seconds. Suspect smears were fully checked by 2 reviewers to determine the final diagnoses. A total of 2954 sequential cytologic results were considered in this study. Of the 2954, 2568 (86.9%) were considered initially negative according to our internal QC, and these cases underwent RR. Also, 10% were randomly selected from these negative cases for full reviewing. The internal QC in our laboratory includes review of cases selected according to clinical and cytomorphologic criteria. RESULTS: Among the 2954 total cases, QC detected 386 (13%) atypias with final diagnoses reported according to The Bethesda System 2001 as follows: 82 (2.18%) low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), 35 (1.18%) high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs), 2 (0.06%) squamous cell carcinomas, 105 (3.5%) atypical cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), 4 (0.12%) atypical endocervical cells (AECs) and 158 (5.3%) unsatisfactory samples. RR of 2568 smears initially considered negative selected 194 (7.5%) slides. Of the 194, 146 (75.3%) were negative, 28 (14.4%) ASC-US, 5 (2.6%) AEC, 1 (0.5%) LSIL and 14 (7.2%) unsatisfactory. Full review of a 10% random fraction of the 2568 cases interpreted as negative did not detect lesions but did detect 5 (1.95%) unsatisfactory samples. CONCLUSION: Internal QC used in our laboratory based on clinical and cytomorphologic criteria to select cases for review proved to be an efficient method of detecting HSIL and cervical cancer. The consensus basis of this program strongly limits the false positive and false negative rates and also provides subjects with continuing education. One hundred percent RR is more efficient than 10% full reviewing in detecting cervical abnormalities.     

Human papillomavirus DNA detection in women with primary abnormal cytology of the cervix: prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we focus on the prevalence and occurrence of different anogenital human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in a first abnormal cervical screening test, and correlate HPV genotyping with the cytological diagnosis on thin-layer liquid-based preparations in routine gynaecological screening. METHODS: Out of 780 abnormal smears, 513 tested positive for HPV. All 25 different HPV types were identified by Line Probe Assay. RESULTS: The prevalence of high-risk HPV types increased from 72% in atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance to 94.5% in high-grade intra-epithelial lesion (HSIL). Co-infection with multiple HPV types was predominantly found in HSIL (35.8%). In the HSIL group the most common HPV types were 16, 52, 51 and 31; type 18 was rarely present. CONCLUSION: The role of types 31, 51 and 52 should be considered in future studies on vaccine development.