Spatial Resilience of Coral Reefs

There have been several earlier studies that addressed the influence of natural disturbance regimes on coral reefs. Humans alter natural disturbance regimes, introduce new stressors, and modify background conditions of reefs. We focus on how coral reef ecosystems relate to disturbance in an increasingly human-dominated environment. The concept of ecosystem resilience—that is, the capacity of complex systems with multiple stable states to absorb disturbance, reorganize, and adapt to change—is central in this context. Instead of focusing on the recovery of certain species and populations within disturbed sites of individual reefs, we address spatial resilience—that is, the dynamic capacity of a reef matrix to reorganize and maintain ecosystem function following disturbance. The interplay between disturbance and ecosystem resilience is highlighted. We begin the identification of spatial sources of resilience in dynamic seascapes and exemplify and discuss the relation between “ecological memory” (biological legacies, mobile link species, and support areas) and functional diversity for seascape resilience. Managing for resilience in dynamic seascapes not only enhances the likelihood of conserving coral reefs, it also provides insurance to society by sustaining essential ecosystem services. Received 25 February 2000; accepted 31 January 2001.     

The Changing Health of Coral Reefs

Throughout their entire global range coral reefs are in decline. Coral bleaching, macroalgal overgrowth and coral diseases — responses signaling the declining health of coral reefs — have occurred with increasing frequency and intensity in recent decades. Decreased calcification may also be affecting coral reefs over longer time scales. Declines in coral reef health have been attributed to various natural and anthropogenic processes, but assignment of causality has proved problematic. Coral bleaching has been observed during extreme climate events such as El Niño; furthermore, there are indications that exposure to UV radiation, air, infectious microbes, and elevated temperature plays a role in the dramatic increase of coral bleaching since the mid-1970s. Macroalgal overgrowth is usually ascribed to eutrophi-cation and coral diseases to weakening of the coral host resistance by anthropogenic pollution. An issue precluding a strict anthropogenic cause of coral reef decline is that both overgrowth and coral diseases are known to occur, although less frequently, on reefs remote from human development. While its causes are still being unraveled, the overall decline in coral reef health sends an unambiguous signal that the coral reef system is losing its ability to withstand sudden or persistent environmental changes.     

Communities of Coral Reefs of Central Vietnam

Communities of macrobenthos on fringing reefs of central Vietnam were studied by the hydrobiological method using scuba diving. The species composition (more than 600 species), population densities of common species of the macrobenthos, and the degree of coverage of the substrate by corals and macrophytes were examined. Bottom communities classified on the basis of these data are indicative of the similarity of the investigated reefs with those of southern and northern Vietnam.     

Ecological Consequences of Sediment on High-Energy Coral Reefs

Sediments are widely accepted as a threat to coral reefs but our understanding of their ecological impacts is limited. Evidence has suggested that benthic sediments bound within the epilithic algal matrix (EAM) suppress reef fish herbivory, a key ecological process maintaining reef resilience. An experimental combination of caging and sediment addition treatments were used to investigate the effects of sediment pulses on herbivory and EAMs and to determine whether sediment addition could trigger a positive-feedback loop, leading to deep, sediment-rich turfs. A 1-week pulsed sediment addition resulted in rapid increases in algal turf length with effects comparable to those seen in herbivore exclusion cages. Contrary to the hypothesised positive-feedback mechanism, benthic sediment loads returned to natural levels within 3 weeks, however, the EAM turfs remained almost 60% longer for at least 3 months. While reduced herbivore density is widely understood to be a major threat to reefs, we show that acute disturbances to reef sediments elicit similar ecological responses in the EAM. With reefs increasingly threatened by both reductions in herbivore biomass and altered sediment fluxes, the development of longer turfs may become more common on coral reefs.     

Patterns of Coral Recruitment and Post-settlement Mortality on Bermuda's Reefs: Comparisons to Caribbean and Pacific Reefs

The recruitment of juvenile corals and post-settlement mortalityare important processes for coral population dynamics and reefcommunity ecology. I monitored juvenile coral recruitment andsurvival on a severely disturbed reef in Bermuda from 1981 to1989 and on adjacent healthy reefs from 1986 to 1990. Poritesastreoides was the dominant recruiting species at all sites,due to the release of brooded planulae that may settle rapidly.The dominant corals on Bermuda's reef, Diploria spp., were poorrecruiters, perhaps due to the broadcast mode of reproductionof these species. However, Diploria spp. have lower juvenilemortality rates compared to P. astreoides, which may explaintheir abundance on Bermuda's reefs. Brooding corals, primarily agariciids, were the dominant recruitson Atlantic reefs compared to high recruitment rates by spawningacroporids in the Pacific, which may be the result of differentenvironmental conditions and/or evolutionary trends in the twooceans. The latter group also suffered high post-settlementmortality compared to brooding coralsin both the Atlantic andthe Pacific. Massive corals in both oceans had generally lowrecruitment rates, related to their spawning mode of reproduction,and low rates of post-settlement mortality. The dominant roleof long-lived massive corals on the Atlantic and Pacific reefscan be understood in terms of their life-history strategy incomparison to the relatively short-lived Pacific acroporidsand Atlantic agariciids that rely on different strategies tomaintain their populations.     

Prioritizing Land and Sea Conservation Investments to Protect Coral Reefs

Background

Coral reefs have exceptional biodiversity, support the livelihoods of millions of people, and are threatened by multiple human activities on land (e.g. farming) and in the sea (e.g. overfishing). Most conservation efforts occur at local scales and, when effective, can increase the resilience of coral reefs to global threats such as climate change (e.g. warming water and ocean acidification). Limited resources for conservation require that we efficiently prioritize where and how to best sustain coral reef ecosystems.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Here we develop the first prioritization approach that can guide regional-scale conservation investments in land- and sea-based conservation actions that cost-effectively mitigate threats to coral reefs, and apply it to the Coral Triangle, an area of significant global attention and funding. Using information on threats to marine ecosystems, effectiveness of management actions at abating threats, and the management and opportunity costs of actions, we calculate the rate of return on investment in two conservation actions in sixteen ecoregions. We discover that marine conservation almost always trumps terrestrial conservation within any ecoregion, but terrestrial conservation in one ecoregion can be a better investment than marine conservation in another. We show how these results could be used to allocate a limited budget for conservation and compare them to priorities based on individual criteria.

Conclusions/Significance

Previous prioritization approaches do not consider both land and sea-based threats or the socioeconomic costs of conserving coral reefs. A simple and transparent approach like ours is essential to support effective coral reef conservation decisions in a large and diverse region like the Coral Triangle, but can be applied at any scale and to other marine ecosystems.     

A Theoretical Model of Pattern Formation in Coral Reefs

We present a mathematical model of the growth of coral subject to unidirectional ocean currents using concepts of porous-media flow and nonlinear dynamics in chemical systems. Linear stability analysis of the system of equations predicts that the growth of solid (coral) structures will be aligned perpendicular to flow, propagating against flow direction. Length scales of spacing between structures are selected based on chemical reaction and flow rates. In the fully nonlinear system, autocatalysis in the chemical reaction accelerates growth. Numerical analysis reveals that the nonlinear growth creates sharp fronts of high solid fraction that, as predicted by the linear stability, advance against the predominating flow direction. The findings of regularly spaced growth areas oriented perpendicular to flow are qualitatively supported on both a colonial and a regional reef scale. Received 1 October 2001; accepted 22 May 2002.     

Coral Reefs and Environmental Change: Adaptation to What?

SYNOPSIS. The present concern about future climate change andsea-level rise due to the enhanced greenhouse effect is putin the context of past changes. Best estimates of future changesare detailed, with an explanation of methods and uncertainties.Considerable progress is being made in regard to estimates offuture sealevel rise and its regional variation, and towardspredicting likely changes in the behaviour of the El Niño-SouthernOscillation (ENSO) and tropical cyclones. Changes in rainfallamounts and intensity, and in extremes of surface temperatureare other critical climatic variables for coral reefs. Impactson coral reefs will result from a combination of stresses arisingfrom several aspects of global change, including stresses dueto sea-level rise, extreme temperatures, human damage (frommining, dredging, fishing and tourism), and changes in salinityand pollutant concentrations (nutrients, pesticides, herbicidesand particulates), and in ocean currents, ENSO, and storm damage.These may be exacerbated by any reduction in calcification ratesof corals due to changes in ocean chemistry. In view of ongoinguncertainties regarding future rates of change, especially atthe local scale, impact and adaptation assessments cannot provideunequivocal answers, but rather must be couched in terms ofprobabilities and risk. Reef communities which are presentlyunder stress are likely to be particularly vulnerable. Bothautonomous and managed (or planned) adaptations should be considered.     

Movements of Fishes Within and Among Fringing Coral Reefs in Barbados

Movement of coral reef fishes across marine reserve boundaries subsequent to their initial settlement from the plankton will affect the ability of no-take reserves to conserve stocks and to benefit adjacent fisheries. However, the mobility of most exploited reef species is poorly known. We tagged 1443 individuals of 35 reef fish species captured in Antillean fish traps in the Barbados Marine Reserve and adjacent non-reserve over a two-month period. Trapping and visual surveys were used to monitor the movements of these fish during the trapping period and the subsequent two months. Estimates of distances moved were corrected for the spatial distribution of sampling effort and for the number of recaptures of individual fish. Recapture rates for individual species ranged from 0–100% (median=38%). Species mobility estimated by recapture and resighting were highly correlated. Most species were strongly site attached, with the majority of recaptures and resightings occurring at the site of tagging. However, only one of 59 tagged jacks (Caranx latus, C. ruber) was ever resighted, suggesting emigration from the study area. All species were occasionally recorded away from the sites where they had been tagged (20–500m), and several species, including surgeonfish, Acanthurus bahianus, A. coeruleus, filefish, Cantherhines pullus, butterflyfish, Chaetodon striatus, angelfish Holocanthus tricolor and parrotfish, Sparisoma viride, ranged widely within reefs. In contrast, few movements were observed between reefs separated by more than 20m of sand and rubble, and no emigration from the Reserve was recorded. Most reef fishes vulnerable to Antillean traps appear sufficiently site-attached to benefit from reserves. However, many species move over a wide enough area to take them out of small reserves on continuous reef. Use of natural home range boundaries could minimize exposure of fishes in reserves to mortality from adjacent fisheries.