The Effect of Novel Chromosome Position and Variable Dose on the Genetic Behavior of the Responder (Rsp) Element of the Segregation Distorter (Sd) System of Drosophila Melanogaster

In the Segregation distorter (SD) system of meiotic drive, a minimum of two trans-acting elements [Sd and E(SD)] act in concert to cause a certain probability of dysfunction for sperm carrying a sensitive allele at the Responder (Rsp) target locus. By employing a number of insertional translocations of autosomal material into the long arm of the Y chromosome, Rsp can be mapped as the most proximal locus in the 2R heterochromatin as defined both by cytology and lethal complementation tests. Several of these insertional translocations result in the transposition of Rsp to the Y chromosome, where its sensitivity remains virtually unaltered. This argues that Rsp is separable from the second chromosome centromere, that its behavior does not depend on its gross chromosomal position, and that meiotic pairing of the chromosomes carrying the various SD elements is not a prerequisite for sperm dysfunction. Several other translocations apparently leave both resulting chromosomes at least partially sensitive to SD action, suggesting that Rsp is a large subdivisible genetic element. This view is compatible with observations published elsewhere that suggest that Rsp is a cytologically large region of highly repetitive AT-rich DNA. The availability of Y-linked copies of Rsp also allows the construction of SD males carrying two independently segregating Rsp alleles; this in turn allows the production of sperm with zero, one or two Rsp copies from the same male. Examination of the relative recovery proportions of progeny arising from these gametes suggests that sperm with two Rsp copies survive at much lower frequencies than would be predicted if each Rsp acted independently in causing sperm dysfunction. Possible explanations for such behavior are discussed.     

Segregation Distortion in Drosophila Melanogaster: Genomic Organization of Responder Sequences

The heterochromatic Responder (Rsp) locus of Drosophila melanogaster is the target of the two distorter loci Sd and E(SD). Rsp is located in a specific heterochromatic region of the second chromosome and is made up of AT-rich satellite sequences whose abundance is related to its sensitivity to the distorter chromosomes. Here we report that a cluster of Rsp sequences is also located in the third chromosome. The third-chromosome cluster has the same flanking sequences as the clone originally used to identify the Rsp elements, and one of the flanking sequences is a rearranged 412 retrotrsansposon. The presence of a second, unlinked Rsp-sequence cluster makes re-interpretation necessary for some earlier experiments in which segregation of the third chromosome had not been followed and raises interesing possibilities for the origin of the Rsp locus.     

The Independent Distorting Ability of the Enhancer of Segregation Distortion, E(sd), in Drosophila Melanogaster

Segregation distortion is a meiotic drive system, discovered in wild populations, in which males heterozygous for an SD chromosome and a sensitive SD+ homolog transmit the SD chromosome almost exclusively. SD represents a complex of three closely linked loci in the centromeric region of chromosome 2: Sd, the Segregation distorter gene; E(SD), the Enhancer of Segregation Distortion, required for full expression of drive; and Rsp, the target for the action of Sd, existing in a continuum of states classifiable into sensitive (Rsps) and insensitive (Rspi). In an SD/SD+ male which is Sd E(SD) Rspi/Sd+ E(SD)+ Rsps, the Sd and E(SD) elements act jointly to induce the dysfunction of those spermatids receiving the Rsps chromosome. By manipulating the number of copies and the position of the Enhancer region, I demonstrated that: (1) E(SD), whether in its normal position or translocated to the Y chromosome, is able to enhance the degree of Sd-caused distortion in a dosage-dependent manner; (2) even in the absence of Sd, the E(SD) allele in two doses can cause significant distortion, in Sd+ or Df(Sd)-bearing genotypes; (3) quantitative differences among Enhancers of different sources suggest allelic variation at E(SD), which could account at least in part for differences among wild SD chromosomes in strength of distortion; (4) E(SD)/E(SD)-mediated distortion, like that of Sd, is directed at the Rsp target, whether Rsp is on the second or the Y chromosome; (5) E(SD), like Sd, is suppressed by an unlinked dominant suppressor of SD action. These results show that E(SD) is independently capable of acting on Rsp and is not a simple modifier of the action of Sd. E(SD) provides an example of a trans-acting gene embedded in heterochromatin that can interact with another heterochromatic gene, Rsp, as well as parallel the effect of a euchromatic gene, Sd.     

Transposition of the Responder Element (Rsp) of the Segregation Distorter System (Sd) to the X Chromosome in Drosophila Melanogaster

In order to test whether the meiotic drive system Segregation distorter (SD) can operate on the X chromosome to exclude it from functional sperm, we have transposed the Responder locus (Rsp) to this element. This was accomplished by inducing detachments of a compound-X chromosome in females carrying a Y chromosome bearing a Rsps allele. Six Responder-sensitive-bearing X chromosomes, with kappa values ranging from 0.90 to 1.00, were established as permanent lines. Two of these have been characterized more extensively with respect to various parameters affecting meiotic drive. SD males with a Responder-sensitive X chromosome produce almost exclusively male embryos, while those with a Rsp-Y chromosome produce almost exclusively female embryos. This provides a genetic system of great potential utility for the study of early sex-specific differentiation events as it allows the collection of large numbers of embryos of a given sex.     

Association between a satellite DNA sequence and the Responder of Segregation Distorter in D. melanogaster

A large array of satellite DNA sequences are always associated with the Responder (Rsp) element of Segregation Distorter in D. melanogaster. In the appropriate genetic backgrounds, Rsp causes aberrant chromatin condensation in spermiogenesis, leading to dysfunction of sperm carrying Rsp, and meiotic drive. The repeat array is deleted or translocated to the Y chromosome whenever Rsp is. Moreover, the translocation of part of Rsp to Y is associated with the translocation of an incomplete repeat array. The number of repeats among 35 independently derived chromosomes correlates nearly perfectly with sensitivity to distortion. We hypothesize that this satellite repeat array represents Responder itself. Finally, the molecular structure of this locus is extremely variable, indicating a very active process of change.     

Population Genetics of Tandem Repeats in Centromeric Heterochromatin: Unequal Crossing over and Chromosomal Divergence at the Responder Locus of Drosophila Melanogaster

The Responder (Rsp) locus in Drosophila melanogaster is the target locus of segregation distortion and is known to be comprised of a tandem array of 120-bp repetitive sequences. In this study, we first determined the large scale molecular structure of the Rsp locus, which extends over a region of 600 kb on the standard sensitive (cn bw) chromosome. Within the region, small Rsp repeat arrays are interspersed with non-Rsp sequences and account for 10-20% of the total sequences. We isolated and sequenced 32 Rsp clones from three different chromosomes. The main results are: (1) Rsp repeats isolated from the same chromosome are not more similar than those from different chromosomes. This implies either that there are more homologous exchanges at the Rsp locus than expected or, alternatively, that the second chromosomes of D. melanogaster have diverged from one another more recently at the centromeric heterochromatin than at the nearby euchromatin. (2) The repeats usually have a dimeric structure with an average difference of 16% between the left and right halves. The differences allow us to easily identify the products of unequal exchanges. Despite the large differences between the two halves, exchanges have occurred frequently and the majority of them fall within a 29-bp interval of identity between the two halves. Our data thus support the suggestion that recombination depends on short stretches of complete identity rather than long stretches of general homology. (3) Frequent unequal crossover events obscure the phylogenetic relationships between repeats; therefore, different parts of any single repeat could often have different phylogenetic histories. The high rate of unequal crossing over may also help explain the evolutionary dynamics of the Rsp locus.     

Further Characterization of Genetic Elements Associated with the Segregation Distorter Phenomenon in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Segregation Distorter, SD, associated with the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster, is known to cause sperm bearing the non-SD homologue to dysfunction in heterozygous males. In earlier studies, using different, independently derived, SD chromosomes, three major loci were identified as contributing to the distortion of segregation ratios in males. In this study the genetic components of the SD-5 chromosome have been the subjects of further investigation, and our findings offer the following information. Crossover analysis confirms the mapping of the Sd locus to a position distal to but closely linked with the genetic marker pr. Spontaneous and radiation-induced recombinational analyses and deficiency studies provide firm support to the notion that the Rsp (Responder) locus lies within the proximal heterochromatin of chromosome 2, between the genetic markers lt and rl and most likely in the heterochromatin of the right arm. The major focus of this study, however, has been on providing a better definition of the genetic properties of the Enhancer of SD [E(SD)]. Our findings place this locus within the region of the two most proximal essential genes in the heterochromatin of the left arm of chromosome 2. Moreover, our analysis reveals a probable association of the E(SD) locus with a meiotic drive independent of that caused by Sd.     

On the Components of Segregation Distortion in Drosophila Melanogaster. IV. Construction and Analysis of Free Duplications for the Responder Locus

Male Drosophila heterozygous for an SD-bearing second chromosome and a normal homolog preferentially transmit the SD chromosome to their offspring. The distorted transmission involves the induced dysfunction of the sperm that receive the SD+ chromosome. The loci on the SD chromosome responsible for causing distortion are the Sd locus the the E(SD) locus. Their target of action on the SD+ chromosome is the Rsps locus. Previous studies of Rsps indicated that deletion of this locus rendered a chromosome insensitive to the action of SD and mapped Rsps physically within the centric heterochromatin of 2R. In this study we have constructed a collection of marked free duplications for the centromeric region of a second chromosome that carried Rsps. The heterochromatic extent of each duplication as well as its sensitivity to distortion was determined. We found that Rsps is the most proximal known locus within the 2R heterochromatin. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the presence of Rsps is not only necessary but sufficient to confer sensitivity to distortion irrespective of its association with an intact second chromosome or one that pairs meiotically with an SD chromosome. By use of these duplications we increased the usual dosage of Rsps relative to SD to determine whether there was any competition for limited amounts of SD [and/or E(SD)] product. When two Rsps-bearing chromosomes are present within the same spermatocyte nucleus an SD chromosome is capable of causing efficient distortion of both. However, at least in some cases the degree of distortion against a given Rsps was reduced by the presence of an extra dose of Rsps indicating that there was some competition between them. The bearing of these results on present models of segregation distortion are discussed.     

Negative Segregation Distortion in the Sd System of Drosophila Melanogaster: A Challenge to the Concept of Differential Sensitivity of Rsp Alleles

Current models of segregation distortion based on previous experimental results predict that, in the Sd heterozygous Rspi/Rsps male, the chromosome carrying the sensitive Rsps allele is distorted or transmitted in a frequency smaller than that of the expected Mendelian 0.5 relative to the chromosome carrying the insensitive Rspi allele. The present study presents a case where this does not occur, that is, when the genotype of the males is supp-X(SD)/Y; Sd E(SD)Rspi M(SD)+/Sd+ E(SD)+ Rsps M(SD)+ where supp-X(SD) is an X chromosome carrying a strong suppressor or suppressors of SD activity and SD+ E(SD)+ Rsps M(SD)+ is the standard cn bw chromosome. Following the "inseminated female transfer" procedure, young males of the above genotype carrying the standard-X instead of the supp-X(SD) chromosome show k values for the SD chromosome (frequencies of the SD chromosome recovered among progeny) of about 0.75, but with the supp-X(SD) chromosome, the k values are reduced to 0.36-0.41. Several possibilities other than the mechanism of segregation distortion to explain the reduced k values are ruled out. The occurrence of "negative segregation distortion" is clearly demonstrated, where the chromosome carrying the Rspi allele is distorted but the chromosome with the Rsps allele is not. This result requires a major modification of the current models or even a new model for the mechanism of segregation distortion to accommodate Rsp allele sensitivity or insensitivity. The present study also shows that males of the genotype, Sd Rspss M(SD)+/Sd+ Rspss M(SD), are almost completely sterile, but their fertility is considerably increased when SD activity is suppressed by the presence of the supp-X(SD) chromosome. This result suggests that the amount of the Sd product is not limited with respect to the interacting sites available, that is, the amount is large enough to interact with both of the Rspss alleles.     

The Selfish Segregation Distorter Gene Complex of Drosophila melanogaster

Segregation Distorter (SD) is an autosomal meiotic drive gene complex found worldwide in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. During spermatogenesis, SD induces dysfunction of SD(+) spermatids so that SD/SD(+) males sire almost exclusively SD-bearing progeny rather than the expected 1:1 Mendelian ratio. SD is thus evolutionarily "selfish," enhancing its own transmission at the expense of its bearers. Here we review the molecular and evolutionary genetics of SD. Genetic analyses show that the SD is a multilocus gene complex involving two key loci-the driver, Segregation distorter (Sd), and the target of drive, Responder (Rsp)-and at least three upward modifiers of distortion. Molecular analyses show that Sd encodes a truncated duplication of the gene RanGAP, whereas Rsp is a large pericentromeric block of satellite DNA. The Sd-RanGAP protein is enzymatically wild type but mislocalized within cells and, for reasons that remain unclear, appears to disrupt the histone-to-protamine transition in drive-sensitive spermatids bearing many Rsp satellite repeats but not drive-insensitive spermatids bearing few or no Rsp satellite repeats. Evolutionary analyses show that the Sd-RanGAP duplication arose recently within the D. melanogaster lineage, exploiting the preexisting and considerably older Rsp satellite locus. Once established, the SD haplotype collected enhancers of distortion and suppressors of recombination. Further dissection of the molecular genetic and cellular basis of SD-mediated distortion seems likely to provide insights into several important areas currently understudied, including the genetic control of spermatogenesis, the maintenance and evolution of satellite DNAs, the possible roles of small interfering RNAs in the germline, and the molecular population genetics of the interaction of genetic linkage and natural selection.     

On the Components of Segregation Distortion in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The segregation distorter (SD) complex is a naturally occurring meiotic drive system with the property that males heterozygous for an SD-bearing chromosome 2 and an SD⁺-bearing homolog transmit the SD-bearing chromosome almost exclusively. This distorted segregation is the consequence of an induced dysfunction of those sperm that receive the SD⁺ homolog. From previous studies, two loci have been implicated in this phenomenon: the Sd locus which is required to produce distortion, and the Responder (Rsp) locus that is the site at which Sd acts. There are two allelic alternatives of Rsp—sensitive (Rsp^sens) and insensitive (Rsp^ins); a chromosome carrying Rsp^ins is not distorted by SD. In the present study, the function and location of each of these elements was examined by a genetic and cytological characterization of X-ray-induced mutations at each locus. The results indicate the following: (1) the Rsp locus is located in the proximal heterochromatin of 2R; (2) a deletion for the Rsp locus renders a chromosome insensitive to distortion; (3) the Sd locus is located to the left of pr (2-54.5), in the region from 37D2-D7 to 38A6-B2 of the salivary chromosome map; (4) an SD chromosome deleted for Sd loses its ability to distort; (5) there is another important component of the SD system, E(SD), in or near the proximal heterochromatin of 2L, that behaves as a strong enhancer of distortion. The results of these studies allow a reinterpretation of results from earlier analyses of the SD system and serve to limit the possible mechanisms to account for segregation distortion.     

Studies on polytene chromosomes of Smittia parthenogenetica (Chironomidae,Diptera)

In polytene chromosome II of Smittia parthenogenetica a heterochromatin insertion has been studied which is derived from a germ-line limited chromosome section (Bauer, 1970). This insertion is C-banding positive, late replicating, inactive in RNA synthesis, fluoresces brightly with quinacrine and is polytenized. After N-banding a major part of the heterochromatin insertion is N-banding negative, whereas in the centre of the insertion a N-banding positive body is present. The properties of the N-positive and N-negative parts of the inserted heterochromatin section are compared with the properties of the heterochromatin of Chironomus melanotus and Drosophila melanogaster. It is concluded that the heterochromatin insertion consists of two different heterochromatin types and it is discussed whether the N-banding positive part within the insertion represents a heterochromatin type which is underreplicated during polytenization.Dedicated to Professor Dr. Hans Bauer in honour of his 75th birthday on September 27, 1979     

Cytogenetic Analysis of the Second Chromosome Heterochromatin of Drosophila Melanogaster

This paper reports the cytogenetic characterization of the second chromosome heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. High resolution cytological analysis of a sample of translocations, inversions, deficiencies and free duplications involving the pericentric regions of the second chromosome was achieved by applying sequential Hoechst 33258 and N-chromosome banding techniques to larval neuroblast prometaphase chromosomes. Heterochromatic rearrangements were employed in a series of complementation assays and the genetic elements previously reported to be within or near the second chromosome heterochromatin were thus precisely assigned to specific heterochromatic bands. The results of this analysis reveal a nonhomogeneous distribution of loci along the second chromosome heterochromatin. The l(2)41Aa, l(2)41Ab, rolled (l(2)41Ac) and l(2)41Ad loci are located within the proximal heterochromatin of 2R, while the nine remaining loci in the left arm and two (l(2)41Ae and l(2)41Ah) in the right arm map to h35 and to h46, respectively, the most distal heterochromatic regions. In addition, a common feature of these loci revealed by the cytogenetic analysis is that they map to specific heterochromatic blocks but do not correspond to the blocks themselves, suggesting that they are not as large as the Y fertility factors or the Rsp locus. Mutations of the proximal most heterochromatic loci, l(2)41Aa and rolled, were also examined for their phenotypic effects. Extensive cell death during imaginal disc development was observed in individuals hemizygous for either the EMS 31 and rolled mutations, leading to a pattern of phenotypic defects of adult structures.     

On the Models of Segregation Distortion in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The Segregation Distorter system of Drosophila melanogaster consists of two major elements, Sd and Rsp. There are two allelic alternatives of Rsp-sensitive (Rsp(s)) and insensitive (Rsp(i)); a chromosome carrying Rsp(i) is not distorted. According to the model proposed by Hartl (1973), these two elements interact to cause segregation distortion. For a sperm to complete the maturation process, it is assumed that the Rsp locus has to be complexed with the product of the Sd locus. This product is assumed to be a multimetric regulatory protein. Three kinds of regulatory multimers may be distinguished: Sd(+)/Sd(+), which is assumed to complex with both Rsp(s) and Rsp(i); Sd(+)/Sd heteromultimers, which complex preferentially with Rsp(i); and Sd/Sd homomultimers, which complex with neither Rsp(s) nor Rsp(i). Most of the regulatory protein in the Sd(+)/Sd heterozygous male is assumed to be the Sd(+)/Sd heteromultimer.--Some modifications of Hartl's model were made by Ganetzky (1977). Rather than the binding of a product of Sd at the Rsp locus being a necessary condition for normal spermigenesis, this binding causes sperm dysfunction. It is assumed that the product of Sd complexes more readily with Rsp(s) than with Rsp(i) and that the amount of Sd product is limited with respect to the number of binding sites available. No function is ascribed to the Sd(+) locus. In order to explain reduced male fertility of some genotypes, Ganetzky further assumes that the Sd product, when not competed for by an Rsp(s) locus, can bind to an Rsp(i) locus.--Two consequences of these models were critically examined: according to these models (1) an Sd Rsp(s)/Sd(+)Rsp(s) male should not show any segregation distortion, and (2) an Sd Rsp(s)/Sd Rsp(s) male should show much reduced fertility, if not complete sterility.--The results of the present study bear on these two points. (1) Rsp(s) locus seems to consist of multiple alleles, each having a different degree of ability to interact with the product of the Sd locus. An Sd Rsp(s)/Sd(+)Rsp(s) male shows a certain degree of segregation distortion when the two Rsp(s) alleles are different, but it shows a normal Mendelian segregation ratio when the Rsp(s) alleles are homozygous. The first prediction of the models is supported by actual observation when the two Rsp(s) alleles are the same. (2) There is a suggestion of slight reduction in fertility, but generally Sd Rsp(s)/Sd Rsp(s) males are quite fertile. Thus, the second prediction is not supported by actual observation. The mechanism of segregation distortion is still open for future studies.     

Detection of Rsp and Modifier Variation in the Meiotic Drive System SEGREGATION DISTORTER (SD) of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Identification of allelic variability at the two major loci (Sd and Rsp) that interact to cause sperm dysfunction in Segregation distorter (SD) males of D. melanogaster has been hampered by the difficulty in separating the elements recombinationally. In addition, small differences in the strength of Sd alleles or sensitivities of Rsp alleles to Sd are difficult to measure against background genetic or environmental variation. Viability effects of the markers used to score progeny classes may also introduce a bias. Removal of Sd and E(SD) from their second chromosome location to create a Dp(2;Y)Sd E(SD) chromosome eliminates these problems, since any combination of Rsp alleles can be easily tested without resorting to recombinational techniques. Further, since these pairs of Rsp alleles are compared in their response to Dp Sd E(SD) in the same individual males, background variation and viability effects can be easily removed to allow fine-scale resolution of Rsp differences. Tests of all possible pairwise combination of six laboratory chromosomes in this way revealed at least three and possibly four different Rsp allelic classes. In addition, the hierarchical nature of the tests further allowed for determination of the presence of linked suppressors or enhancers of Sd activity. A sample of 11 second chromosomes selected from a group recently isolated from a natural population was also unambiguously ordered as to Rsp allelic status using this approach. The resultant pattern was similar to that obtained for the laboratory chromosomes, except for the not unexpected observation that the natural population apparently harbored more drive suppressors. The pattern of results obtained from these pairwise combinations of Rsp alleles supports the notion that there are no dominance interactions within the group, but that each responds more or less independently to Sd in giving sperm dysfunction.     

Biological parameters and the segregation distortion (SD) phenomenon in Drosophila melanogaster

The relationship between some biological parameters (mortality, longevity, fertility, fecundity and sex ratio) and segregation of second chromosomes in heterozygous and homozygous SD males has been analyzed. The results obtained in SD/SD+ heterozygous males show: (1) their reduced fertility with respect to that of control males, (2) an alteration in the sex ratio in the SD+ progeny only, and (3) inversely related sex-ratio and segregation distortion values. In SDi/SDj combinations: (1) surprisingly, fertility is intermediate between that of SD/SD+ heterozygous males and that of control males, (2) the segregation ratios of the second chromosomes are normal (0.50), and (3) the sex ratio = 0.50 in both classes of SD progeny. The relationship between mortality (and therefore longevity) and fertility of the different genotypes and fecundity per male indicates that the total productivity of heterozygous males is less than that so far claimed. Indeed, their productivity depends not only on the mechanism of nonformation of the SD+ sperm, but also on their reduced longevity. The k = 0.50 and the high fecundity of SDi/SDj combinations indicated that in these males the SD phenomenon is partially suppressed, the SD chromosomes being insensitive to each other, thus implying that particular Rsp alleles are sensitive to given Sd alleles. The complementation pattern for male fertility of SD homozygous males again supports previous evidence that Sd factors from natural populations are, in effect, different Sd genes.     

Alpha and beta heterochromatin in polytene chromosome 2 ofDrosophila melanogaster

The formation of alpha and beta heterochromatin in chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster was studied in salivary glands (SGs) and pseudonurse cells (PNCs). In SGs of X0, XY, XYY, XX and XXY individuals the amounts of alpha heterochromatin were similar, suggesting that the Y chromosome does not substantially contribute to alpha heterochromatin formation. Pericentric heterochromatin developed a linear sequence of blocks in PNCs, showing morphology of both alpha and beta heterochromatin. In situ hybridization with Rsp sequences (H _o clone) revealed that the most proximal heterochromatic segment of the mitotic map (region h39) formed a polytenized block in PNCs. Dot analysis showed that the clone had a hybridization rate with PNC-DNA very close to that with DNA from mainly diploid head cells, whereas the homologous SG-DNA was dramatically underrepresented. A similar increase of DNA representation in PNC was found for AAGAC satellite DNA. The mitotic region h44 was found not to polytenize in the SG chromosome, whereas in PNC chromosome 2 this region was partly polytenized and presented as an array of several blocks of alpha and beta heterochromatin. The mapping of deficiencies with proximal breakpoints in the most distal heterochromatin segments h35 in arm 2L and h46 in 2R showed that the mitotic eu-heterochromatin transitions were located in SG chromosomes distally to the polytene 40E and 41C regions, respectively. Thus, the transition zones between mitotic hetero- and euchromatin are located in banded polytene euchromatin. A scheme for dynamic organization of pericentric heterochromatin in nuclei with polytene chromosomes is proposed. Received: 17 November 1995; in revised form: 10 April 1996 / Accepted: 18 September 1996