Dominant distribution of mitochondrial DNA from recipient oocytes in bovine embryos and offspring after nuclear transfer

In the process of nuclear transfer, heteroplasmic sources of mitochondrial DNA from a donor cell and a recipient oocyte are mixed in the cytoplasm of the reconstituted embryo. The distribution of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in nuclear transfer bovine embryos and resultant offspring was investigated by measuring polymorphism in the displacement loop region of mitochondrial DNA using PCR-mediated single-strand conformation polymorphism. Most offspring (20 of 21 calves) from recipient oocytes of undefined mitochondrial DNA genotypes showed different genotypes from the mitochondrial DNA of donor cells. The single calf that was an exception showed heteroplasmy, including the donor mitochondrial DNA genotype. Six cloned calves were produced from oocytes of a defined mitochondrial DNA genotype. All of these clonal members and various tissues showed only the mitochondrial DNA genotype derived from the oocyte. The mitochondrial DNA from donor cells appeared to be eliminated during early embryonic development; it gradually decreased at the early cleavage stages and was hardly detectable by the blastocyst stage. These results indicate that the genotype of mitochondrial DNA from recipient oocytes may become the dominant category of mitochondrial DNA in calves resulting from nuclear transfer.     

Fate of donor mitochondrial DNA in cloned bovine embryos produced by microinjection of cumulus cells

This study examined the fate of donor mitochondrial DNA during preimplantation development after nuclear transfer (NT) in cattle. Frozen-thawed cumulus cells were used as donor cells in the nuclear transfer. Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in the nuclear transfer embryos was analyzed by allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR), direct DNA sequencing, and DNA chromatography. AS-PCR analysis for the detection of donor mitochondrial DNA was performed at the 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, 16-cell, morula, and blastocyst stages of the embryos. The mitochondrial DNA from donor cells was detected at all developmental stages of the nuclear transfer embryos. However, mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy was not observed in direct DNA sequencing of displacement-loop sequence from nuclear-transfer-derived blastocyst embryos. To confirm the mtDNA heteroplasmy in cloned embryos, the AS-PCR product from NT-derived blastocysts was analyzed by DNA sequencing and DNA chromatography. The nucleotides of NT-derived blastocysts were in accordance with the nucleotides from donor cells. These results indicate that the foreign cytoplasmic genome from donor cells was not destroyed by cytoplasmic events during preimplantation development that followed nuclear transfer.     

Blastocysts produced by nuclear transfer between chicken blastodermal cells and rabbit oocytes

Interspecies nuclear transfer (INT) has been used as an invaluable tool for studying nucleus-cytoplasm interactions; and it may also be a method for rescuing endangered species whose oocytes are difficult to obtain. In the present study, we investigated interaction of the chicken genome with the rabbit oocyte cytoplasm. When chicken blastodermal cells were transferred into the perivitelline space of rabbit oocytes, 79.3% of the couplets were fused and 9.7% of the fused embryos developed to the blastocyst stage. Both M199 and SOF medium were used for culturing chicken-rabbit cloned embryos; embryo development was arrested at the 8-cell stage obtained in SOF medium, while the rates of morulae and blastocysts were 12.1 and 9.7%, respectively, in M199 medium. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of nuclear DNA and karyotype analyses confirmed that genetic material of morulae and blastocysts was derived from the chicken donor cells. Analysis mitochondrial constitution of the chicken-rabbit cloned embryos found that mitochondria, from both donor cells and enucleated oocytes, co-existed. Our results suggest that: (1) chicken genome can coordinate with rabbit oocyte cytoplasm in early embryo development; (2) there may be an 8- to 16-cell stage block for the chicken-rabbit cloned embryos when cultured in vitro; (3) mitochondrial DNA from the chicken donor cells was not eliminated until the blastocyst stage in the chicken-rabbit cloned embryos; (4) factors existing in ooplasm for somatic nucleus reprogramming may be highly conservative.     

Proliferation of donor mitochondrial DNA in nuclear transfer calves (Bos taurus) derived from cumulus cells

In embryos derived by nuclear-transfer (NT), fusion of donor cell and recipient oocyte caused mitochondrial heteroplasmy. Previous studies from other laboratories have reported either elimination or maintenance of donor-derived mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from somatic cells in cloned animals. Here we examined the distribution of donor mtDNA in NT embryos and calves derived from somatic cells. Donor mitochondria were clearly observed by fluorescence labeling in the cytoplasm of NT embryos immediately after fusion; however, fluorescence diminished to undetectable levels at 24 hr after nuclear transfer. By PCR-mediated single-strand conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis, donor mtDNAs were not detected in the NT embryos immediately after fusion (less than 3-4%). In contrast, three of nine NT calves exhibited heteroplasmy with donor cell mtDNA populations ranging from 6 to 40%. These results provide the first evidence of a significant replicative advantage of donor mtDNAs to recipient mtDNAs during the course of embryogenesis in NT calves from somatic cells.     

A simple DNA extraction and rapid specific identification technique for single cells and early embryos of two breeds of Bos taurus

In the process of nuclear transfer (NT), different cytoplasm from a donor cell and a recipient oocyte are mixed. However, it is unclear what effect the donor cytoplasm has upon the dedifferentiation of donor nuclei in enucleated ooplasm and upon subsequent production of live cloned offspring. Mitochondria are component parts of cytoplasm so the detection of mitochondrial DNA is helpful to reveal changes of donor cytoplasm in the NT reconstructed embryos. In this study, the experiments were designed to develop efficient DNA extraction techniques and specific primer pairs for mitochondrial DNA of Holstein and Chinese Yellow breeds in order to identify the changes of donor cytoplasm in early stage embryos. Firstly, by adding Triton X-100 and Taq DNA polymerase reaction buffer to the DNA extraction mixture, DNA was rapidly isolated from single diploid cells, single oocytes, early stage embryos and from single hairs. Secondly, two specific primer pairs for the two breeds were designed to detect the cytoplasmic DNA in a different amount of single cells and in early stage embryos. The results show that two specific fragments were successfully amplified from single somatic cells, single oocytes, parthenogenetic embryos and from NT reconstructed embryos. As a result, the techniques provide a powerful tool for studying the developmental mechanism in NT reconstructed embryos.     

Improvement of the nuclear transfer efficiency by using the same genetic background of recipient oocytes as the somatic donor cells in goats

We have compared the effect of the genetic background of recipient oocytes on the in vitro and in vivo development of nuclear transfer reconstructed embryos in goats. Adult fibroblast cells from Boer goats were used as donor cells, and recipient oocytes were obtained from Boer goats and Boer cross-breeds (Boer♂×Huanghuai♀). Nuclear transfer reconstructed embryos were cultured in vitro, or transferred into recipient goats. The mitochondrial origin of 2 cloned Boer goats was investigated by analysing the D-loop region based on polymorphisms via DNA sequencing. There was no significant difference in the fusion rate and cleavage rate of reconstructed embryos (P>0.05), when using Boer and cross-breeding goat oocytes as recipient cytoplast respectively. However, in vitro morula development of reconstructed embryos from Boer oocytes was significantly higher than that of cross-breeding embryos (34.1% versus 19.1%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of pregnancy and foetus loss between the 2 breeds. However, the live-birth rate was significantly higher with Boer goat oocyte recipients than the cross-breeds (3.1% versus 0.8%, P<0.05). Mitochondrial analysis showed that the 2 cloned goats were similar to their respective oocyte donor goats, and significantly different from the nucleus donor. In conclusion, genetic background of recipient oocytes affected in vitro and in vivo development of reconstructed embryos, with the homologous background of cytoplast and nuclear donor benefiting development of reconstructed embryos. The mitochondrial origin of the 2 cloned Boer goats came from recipient oocytes, not donors.     

Segregation of donor cell mitochondrial DNA in gaur-bovine interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos, fetuses and an offspring

The fate of foreign mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) following somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is still controversial. In this study, we examined the transmission of the heteroplasmic mtDNA of gaur donor cells and recipient bovine oocytes to an offspring and aborted and mummified fetuses at various levels during the development of gaur-bovine interspecies SCNT (iSCNT) embryos. High levels of the donor cell mtDNA were found in various tissue samples but they did not have any beneficial effect to the survival of iSCNT offspring. However, the factors on mtDNA inheritance are unique for each iSCNT experiment and depend on the recipient oocyte and donor cell used, which might play an important role in the efficiency of iSCNT.     

Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer is dependent on compatible mitochondrial DNA and reprogramming factors

Interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) involves the transfer of a nucleus or cell from one species into the cytoplasm of an enucleated oocyte from another. Once activated, reconstructed oocytes can be cultured in vitro to blastocyst, the final stage of preimplantation development. However, they often arrest during the early stages of preimplantation development; fail to reprogramme the somatic nucleus; and eliminate the accompanying donor cell's mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in favour of the recipient oocyte's genetically more divergent population. This last point has consequences for the production of ATP by the electron transfer chain, which is encoded by nuclear and mtDNA. Using a murine-porcine interspecies model, we investigated the importance of nuclear-cytoplasmic compatibility on successful development. Initially, we transferred murine fetal fibroblasts into enucleated porcine oocytes, which resulted in extremely low blastocyst rates (0.48%); and failure to replicate nuclear DNA and express Oct-4, the key marker of reprogramming. Using allele specific-PCR, we detected peak levels of murine mtDNA at 0.14±0.055% of total mtDNA at the 2-cell embryo stage and then at ever-decreasing levels to the blastocyst stage (<0.001%). Furthermore, these embryos had an overall mtDNA profile similar to porcine embryos. We then depleted porcine oocytes of their mtDNA using 10 μM 2',3'-dideoxycytidine and transferred murine somatic cells along with murine embryonic stem cell extract, which expressed key pluripotent genes associated with reprogramming and contained mitochondria, into these oocytes. Blastocyst rates increased significantly (3.38%) compared to embryos generated from non-supplemented oocytes (P<0.01). They also had significantly more murine mtDNA at the 2-cell stage than the non-supplemented embryos, which was maintained throughout early preimplantation development. At later stages, these embryos possessed 49.99±2.97% murine mtDNA. They also exhibited an mtDNA profile similar to murine preimplantation embryos. Overall, these data demonstrate that the addition of species compatible mtDNA and reprogramming factors improves developmental outcomes for iSCNT embryos.     

The developmental competence of bovine nuclear transfer embryos derived from cow versus heifer cytoplasts

Due to its economic importance, the production of cattle by nuclear transfer has been a primary research focus for many researchers during the past few years. While many groups have successfully produced cattle by nuclear transfer, and progress in this area continues, nuclear transfer remains a very inefficient technology. This study evaluates the effect of the oocyte source (cow and heifer) on the developmental competence of nuclear transfer embryos. In order for nuclear transfer to be successful, a differentiated donor cell must be reprogrammed and restored to a totipotent state. This reprogramming is probably accomplished by factors within the oocyte cytoplasm. This study indicates that oocytes derived from cows have a greater capacity to reprogram donor cell DNA following nuclear transfer as compared to heifer oocytes based on in vitro development to the 2-cell stage and to the compacted morula/blastocyst stages. Nuclear transfer embryos derived from cow oocytes resulted in significantly higher rates of pregnancy establishment than embryos derived from heifer oocytes and resulted in higher pregnancy retention at 90 and 180 days and a greater number of term deliveries. Following delivery more calves derived from cow oocytes tended to be healthy and normal than those derived from heifer oocytes. The differences in developmental efficiency between nuclear transfer embryos derived from cow and heifer cytoplasts demonstrate that subtle differences in oocyte biology can have significant effects on subsequent development of nuclear transfer embryos.     

Aberrant heteroplasmic transmission of mtDNA in cloned pigs arising from double nuclear transfer

Double nuclear transfer begins with the transfer of nuclear DNA from a donor cell into an enucleated recipient oocyte. This reconstructed oocyte is allowed to develop to the pronuclear stage, where the pronuclei are transferred into an enucleated zygote. This reconstructed zygote is then transferred to a surrogate sow. The genetic integrity of cloned offspring can be compromised by the transmission of mitochondrial DNA from the donor cell, the recipient oocyte and the recipient zygote. We have verified through the use of sequence analysis, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis, allele specific PCR and primer extension polymorphism analysis that following double nuclear transfer the donor cell mtDNA is eliminated. However, it is likely that the recipient oocyte and zygote mitochondrial DNA are transmitted to the offspring, indicating bimaternal mitochondrial DNA transmission. This pattern of mtDNA inheritance is similar to that observed following cytoplasmic transfer and violates the strict unimaternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA to offspring. This form of transmission raises concerns regarding the genetic integrity of cloned offspring and their uses in studies that require metabolic analysis or a stable genetic environment where only one variable is under analysis, such as in knockout technology.     

Dependence of DNA synthesis and in vitro development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos on the stage of the cell cycle of donor cells and recipient cytoplasts

The effect of the stage of the cell cycle of donor cells and recipient cytoplasts on the timing of DNA replication and the developmental ability in vitro of bovine nuclear transfer embryos was examined. Embryos were reconstructed by fusing somatic cells with unactivated recipient cytoplasts or with recipient cytoplasts that were activated 2 h before fusion. Regardless of whether recipient cytoplasts were unactivated or activated, the embryos that were reconstructed from donor cells at the G0 phase initiated DNA synthesis at 6-9 h postfusion (hpf). The timing of DNA synthesis was similar to that of parthenogenetic embryos, and was earlier than that of the G0 cells in cell culture condition. Most embryos that were reconstructed from donor cells at the G1/S phase initiated DNA synthesis within 6 hpf. The developmental rate of embryos reconstructed by a combination of G1/S cells and activated cytoplasts was higher than the rates of embryos in the other combination of donor cells and recipient cytoplasts. The results suggest that the initial DNA synthesis of nuclear transfer embryos is affected by the state of the recipient oocytes, and that the timing of initiation of the DNA synthesis depends on the donor cell cycle. Our results also suggest that the cell cycles of somatic cells synchronized in the G1/S phase and activated cytoplasts of recipient oocytes are well coordinated after nuclear transfer, resulting in high developmental rates of nuclear transfer embryos to the blastocyst stage in vitro.     

Role of mitochondrial DNA replication during differentiation of reprogrammed stem cells

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a 16.6 kb genome that encodes for 13 of the 100+ subunits of the electron transfer chain (ETC), whilst the other subunits are encoded by chromosomal DNA. The ETC is responsible for the generation of the majority of cellular ATP through the process of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). mtDNA is normally inherited from the population present in the mature oocyte just prior to fertilisation. However, following somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), mtDNA can be transmitted from both the donor cell and the recipient oocyte. This heteroplasmic transmission of mtDNA is a random event and does not appear to be related to the amount of mtDNA contributed by the donor cell. The distribution of mtDNA is randomly segregated between blastomeres and differentiating tissues, and therefore the mtDNA complement transmitted to offspring tissue cannot be predicted. mtDNA divergence between the cytoplast and the donor cell in intra- and inter-specific crosses favours a slightly more diverse mtDNA haplotype. However, this is limited as interspecies SCNT (iSCNT) genetic divergence contributes to developmental failure. SCNT embryos demonstrate a plethora of aberrantly reprogrammed characteristics including the uncoordinated regulation of the mtDNA replication factors. This results in increased mtDNA copy number during preimplantation development and propagates the replication of donor cell mtDNA. These failures are likely to be a consequence of incompatible nuclear- and mtDNA -encoded proteins interacting within the ETC thus reducing ATP production. The outcomes would be similar to the severely debilitating or even fatal mtDNA diseases associated with genetic rearrangements to mtDNA or mtDNA depletion type syndromes and have serious implications for any form of karyoplast transfer approach. The only method to overcome the problems of heteroplasmy in SCNT embryos is to completely deplete the donor cell of its mtDNA prior to SCNT.     

Donor-host mitochondrial compatibility improves efficiency of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer

Background  

The interaction between the karyoplast and cytoplast plays an important role in the efficiency of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. It is generally accepted that in nuclear transfer embryos, the reprogramming of gene expression is induced by epigenetic mechanisms and does not involve modifications of DNA sequences. In cattle, oocytes with various mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplotypes usually have different ATP content and can further affect the efficiency of in vitro production of embryos. As mtDNA comes from the recipient oocyte during SCNT and is regulated by genes in the donor nucleus, it is a perfect model to investigate the interaction between donor nuclei and host oocytes in SCNT.