Synaptonemal complex components persist at centromeres and are required for homologous centromere pairing in mouse spermatocytes

Recent studies in simple model organisms have shown that centromere pairing is important for ensuring high-fidelity meiotic chromosome segregation. However, this process and the mechanisms regulating it in higher eukaryotes are unknown. Here we present the first detailed study of meiotic centromere pairing in mouse spermatogenesis and link it with key events of the G2/metaphase I transition. In mouse we observed no evidence of the persistent coupling of centromeres that has been observed in several model organisms. We do however find that telomeres associate in non-homologous pairs or small groups in B type spermatogonia and pre-leptotene spermatocytes, and this association is disrupted by deletion of the synaptonemal complex component SYCP3. Intriguingly, we found that, in mid prophase, chromosome synapsis is not initiated at centromeres, and centromeric regions are the last to pair in the zygotene-pachytene transition. In late prophase, we first identified the proteins that reside at paired centromeres. We found that components of the central and lateral element and transverse filaments of the synaptonemal complex are retained at paired centromeres after disassembly of the synaptonemal complex along diplotene chromosome arms. The absence of SYCP1 prevents centromere pairing in knockout mouse spermatocytes. The localization dynamics of SYCP1 and SYCP3 suggest that they play different roles in promoting homologous centromere pairing. SYCP1 remains only at paired centromeres coincident with the time at which some kinetochore proteins begin loading at centromeres, consistent with a role in assembly of meiosis-specific kinetochores. After removal of SYCP1 from centromeres, SYCP3 then accumulates at paired centromeres where it may promote bi-orientation of homologous centromeres. We propose that, in addition to their roles as synaptonemal complex components, SYCP1 and SYCP3 act at the centromeres to promote the establishment and/or maintenance of centromere pairing and, by doing so, improve the segregation fidelity of mammalian meiotic chromosomes.     

Whole mount electron microscopy of meiotic chromosomes and the synaptonemal complex

The mechanism by which homologous chromosomes pair and crossover has been a major unsolved problem in genetics. Thin section electron microscopy of the synaptonemal complex has not provided enough details to allow any significant insight into this problem. Whole mount preparations of the testis of mice, quail, crayfish, and frogs provided a striking improvement in visualization of the morphological features of meiotic chromosomes. These studies, when combined with the use of deoxyribonuclease and trypsin allowed the following conclusions. 1. The synaptonemal complex (lateral and central elements with connecting L-C fibers) is composed of protein. 2. Contrary to common speculation the central element is not the pairing surface of homologous chromosomes. 3. The L-C fibers, averaging 75–100 Å in width, extend from the lateral elements and meet to form the central element which is usually composed of four fibers. 4. During leptotene, homologous axial elements, although unpaired for most of their length, attach next to each other at the nuclear membrane. 5. Short segments of the chromatin fibers attach to the lateral elements. These points of attachment are clustered, producing the chromomeres seen by light microscopy. 6. The chromatin fibers extend out from the lateral element as loops. Lampbrush chromosomes are thus not restricted to oogenesis but are common to all meiotic chromosomes.Since the morphological features of the central element of the synaptonemal complex persist despite extensive deoxyribonuclease digestion, pairing is perhaps best visualized as a two-step process consisting of a) chromosomal pairing during which the proteinaceous synaptonemal complex pulls homologous chromosomes into approximate association with each other, and b) molecular pairing, which probably takes place in the area around the synaptonemal complex.Supported by NIH Grants GM-15886 and C-2568, and The Charles and Henrietta Detoy Research Fellowship.     

Meiotic recombination in Drosophila females depends on chromosome continuity between genetically defined boundaries

In the pairing-site model, specialized regions on each chromosome function to establish meiotic homolog pairing. Analysis of these sites could provide insights into the mechanism used by Drosophila females to form a synaptonemal complex (SC) in the absence of meiotic recombination. These specialized sites were first established on the X chromosome by noting that there were barriers to crossover suppression caused by translocation heterozygotes. These sites were genetically mapped and proposed to be pairing sites. By comparing the cytological breakpoints of third chromosome translocations to their patterns of crossover suppression, we have mapped two sites on chromosome 3R. We have performed experiments to determine if these sites have a role in meiotic homolog pairing and the initiation of recombination. Translocation heterozygotes exhibit reduced gene conversion within the crossover-suppressed region, consistent with an effect on the initiation of meiotic recombination. To determine if homolog pairing is disrupted in translocation heterozygotes, we used fluorescent in situ hybridization to measure the extent of homolog pairing. In wild-type oocytes, homologs are paired along their entire lengths prior to accumulation of the SC protein C(3)G. Surprisingly, translocation heterozygotes exhibited homolog pairing similar to wild type within the crossover-suppressed regions. This result contrasted with our observations of c(3)G mutant females, which were found to be defective in pairing. We propose that each Drosophila chromosome is divided into several domains by specialized sites. These sites are not required for homolog pairing. Instead, the initiation of meiotic recombination requires continuity of the meiotic chromosome structure within each of these domains.     

Chromosome-wide regulation of meiotic crossover formation in Caenorhabditis elegans requires properly assembled chromosome axes

Most sexually reproducing organisms depend on the regulated formation of crossovers, and the consequent chiasmata, to accomplish successful segregation of homologous chromosomes at the meiosis I division. A robust, chromosome-wide crossover control system limits chromosome pairs to one crossover in most meioses in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans; this system has been proposed to rely on structural integrity of meiotic chromosome axes. Here, we test this hypothesis using a mutant, him-3(me80), that assembles reduced levels of meiosis-specific axis component HIM-3 along cohesin-containing chromosome axes. Whereas pairing, synapsis, and crossing over are eliminated when HIM-3 is absent, the him-3(me80) mutant supports assembly of synaptonemal complex protein SYP-1 along some paired chromosomes, resulting in partial competence for chiasma formation. We present both genetic and cytological evidence indicating that the him-3(me80) mutation leads to an increased incidence of meiotic products with two crossovers. These results indicate that limiting the amount of a major axis component results in a reduced capacity to communicate the presence of a (nascent) crossover and/or to discourage others in response.     

The chromodomain protein MRG-1 facilitates SC-independent homologous pairing during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans

Homologous chromosome pairing is a prerequisite to establish physical linkage between homologs, which is critical for faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I. The establishment of pairing is genetically separable from subsequent synapsis, defined as stabilization of pairing by the synaptonemal complex (SC). The underlying mechanism of presynaptic pairing is poorly understood. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a unique cis-acting element, the pairing center (PC), is essential for presynaptic pairing; however, it is not known whether and how the remainder of the chromosome contributes to presynaptic pairing. Here we report direct evidence for presynaptic pairing activity intrinsic to non-PC regions, which is facilitated by a conserved chromodomain protein, MRG-1. In mrg-1 loss-of-function mutants, pairing is compromised specifically in non-PC regions, leading to nonhomologous SC assembly. Our data support a model in which presynaptic alignment in non-PC regions collaborates with initial PC pairing to ensure correct homologous synapsis.     

Couples,pairs, and clusters: mechanisms and implications of centromere associations in meiosis

Observations of a wide range of organisms show that the centromeres form associations of pairs or small groups at different stages of meiotic prophase. Little is known about the functions or mechanisms of these associations, but in many cases, synaptonemal complex elements seem to play a fundamental role. Two main associations are observed: homology-independent associations very early in the meiotic program—sometimes referred to as centromere coupling—and a later association of homologous centromeres, referred to as centromere pairing or tethering. The later centromere pairing initiates during synaptonemal complex assembly, then persists after the dissolution of the synaptonemal complex. While the function of the homology-independent centromere coupling remains a mystery, centromere pairing appears to have a direct impact on the chromosome segregation fidelity of achiasmatic chromosomes. Recent work in yeast, Drosophila, and mice suggest that centromere pairing is a previously unappreciated, general meiotic feature that may promote meiotic segregation fidelity of the exchange and non-exchange chromosomes.     

Molecular perspectives of chromosome pairing at meiosis

Ideas about the mechanisms that regulate chromosome pairing, recombination, and segregation during meiosis have gained in molecular detail over the last few years. The purpose of this article is to survey briefly the shifts in paradigms and experiments that have generated new perspectives. It has never been very clear what it is that brings together the homologous chromosomes at meiotic prophase. For a while it appeared that the synaptonemal complex might be the nuclear organelle responsible for synapsis, but the supporting evidence has not been entirely convincing. Whatever the mechanism, it has always been assumed that homologous synapsis creates the opportunity for homologous DNA sequences to initiate recombination. At present, alternative ideas are developing. Attractive is the concept that double strand DNA repair mechanisms, that find and use the undamaged homologue for repair, have evolved into a meiotic mechanism for the recognition and pairing of homologous sequences. Subsequent intimate synapsis of homologous chromosomes in the context of the synaptonemal complex may serve later functions in the regulation of interference and segregation at first anaphase. A number of areas that are being tested at present and some that may be investigated in the future are discussed at the end of the review.     

Protein Phosphatase 4 Promotes Chromosome Pairing and Synapsis,and Contributes to Maintaining Crossover Competence with Increasing Age

Prior to the meiotic divisions, dynamic chromosome reorganizations including pairing, synapsis, and recombination of maternal and paternal chromosome pairs must occur in a highly regulated fashion during meiotic prophase. How chromosomes identify each other''s homology and exclusively pair and synapse with their homologous partners, while rejecting illegitimate synapsis with non-homologous chromosomes, remains obscure. In addition, how the levels of recombination initiation and crossover formation are regulated so that sufficient, but not deleterious, levels of DNA breaks are made and processed into crossovers is not understood well. We show that in Caenorhabditis elegans, the highly conserved Serine/Threonine protein phosphatase PP4 homolog, PPH-4.1, is required independently to carry out four separate functions involving meiotic chromosome dynamics: (1) synapsis-independent chromosome pairing, (2) restriction of synapsis to homologous chromosomes, (3) programmed DNA double-strand break initiation, and (4) crossover formation. Using quantitative imaging of mutant strains, including super-resolution (3D-SIM) microscopy of chromosomes and the synaptonemal complex, we show that independently-arising defects in each of these processes in the absence of PPH-4.1 activity ultimately lead to meiotic nondisjunction and embryonic lethality. Interestingly, we find that defects in double-strand break initiation and crossover formation, but not pairing or synapsis, become even more severe in the germlines of older mutant animals, indicating an increased dependence on PPH-4.1 with increasing maternal age. Our results demonstrate that PPH-4.1 plays multiple, independent roles in meiotic prophase chromosome dynamics and maintaining meiotic competence in aging germlines. PP4''s high degree of conservation suggests it may be a universal regulator of meiotic prophase chromosome dynamics.     

Synaptonemal complex analysis of hybrid cattle. III. Meiotic pairing mechanisms in F1 Brahman x Hereford hybrids

The mechanisms of homologous chromosome pairing were studied in synaptonemal complex (SC) spreads of F1 Brahman (Bos indicus) x Hereford (Bos taurus) cattle. The most common SC abnormalities were bivalents with partial pairing failure and interlocks. While C-band polymorphisms could underlie most of the SC abnormalities observed in the full-blood cattle, other causes seem also to be contributing in the hybrids. The pattern of the abnormalities indicates that genic differences between the species were probably involved. Pachytene substaging data suggest that in some spreads, early pachytene bivalents with partial pairing failure may achieve complete synapsis or may be converted to interlocks by late pachytene.     

Components of the RNAi machinery that mediate long-distance chromosomal associations are dispensable for meiotic and early somatic homolog pairing in Drosophila melanogaster

Homolog pairing is indispensable for the proper segregation of chromosomes in meiosis but the mechanism by which homologs uniquely pair with each other is poorly understood. In Drosophila, somatic chromosomes also undergo full homolog pairing by an unknown mechanism. It has been recently demonstrated that both insulator function and somatic long-distance interactions between Polycomb response elements (PREs) are stabilized by the RNAi machinery in Drosophila. This suggests the possibility that long-distance pairing interactions between homologs, either during meiosis or in the soma, may be stabilized by a similar mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we have characterized meiotic and early somatic chromosome pairing of homologous chromosomes in flies that are mutant for various components of the RNAi machinery. Despite the identification of a novel role for the piRNA machinery in meiotic progression and synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly, we have found that the components of the RNAi machinery that mediate long-distance chromosomal interactions are dispensable for homologous chromosome pairing. Thus, there appears to be at least two mechanisms that bring homologous sequences together within the nucleus: those that act between dispersed homologous sequences and those that act to align and pair homologous chromosomes.     

Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and A. fistulosum

The general features and fine structure of homologous chromosome alignment and pairing have been investigated in two species of Allium (A. fistulosum and A. cepa), which have similar karyotypes but very different patterns of chiasma distribution. Although there is no support for the occurrence of a general pre-meiotic alignment of homologous chromosomes, both species show some alignment of homologues as an immediate prelude to synaptonemal complex (SC) formation. In both species pairing usually commences at sub-terminal sites and is succeeded by numerous separate intercalary initiations of pairing in interstitial and distal regions and then in proximal regions. The last parts to pair, in both species, are pericentromeric and telomeric regions. There is, therefore, no evident relationship between the sequence of pairing and chiasma distribution in these species. Regularly alternating convergences and divergences of aligned axial cores (ACs), termed multiple association sites, are frequently observed. It is proposed that these represent potential pairing initiation sites and from observations on their spatial distribution it is argued that they may be evenly distributed through most of the genome. Small spherical or ellipsoid nodules are found at association sites and between closely aligned ACs which persist in the SC segments present during zygotene, but most of them disappear abruptly at the end of zygotene. These are termed zygotene nodules (ZN) and it is proposed that they are involved in matching corresponding sites on homologous chromosomes as well as possibly having a recombinational role. Their composition, structure, mode of action and relationship to pachytene recombination nodules are at present unknown.     

OsSPO11-1 is essential for both homologous chromosome pairing and crossover formation in rice

Spo11 is a homolog of a subunit of archaebacterial topoisomerase, which catalyzes DNA double-strand breaks and initiates homologous chromosome recombination. In the present study, we silenced the SPO11-1 gene in rice (Oryza sativa) using RNAi. Rice plants with loss-of-function of OsSPO11-1 have no apparent growth defects during vegetative development, but homologous chromosome pairing and recombination are significantly obstructed. Telomeres can be assembled as bouquet during the zygotene stage of the OsSPO11-1-deficient plants, just as that in wild type. Although the two axial-associated proteins, REC8 and PAIR2, are loaded onto the chromosomes, the depletion of PAIR2 from the chromosomes is much later than in wild type. The central element of the synaptonemal complex (SC), ZEP1, does not load onto the chromosomes normally, implying that SC formation is disturbed severely. The crossover protein, MER3, isn't efficiently assembled onto chromosomes and the lack of bivalent suggests that crossovers are also affected in the absence of OsSPO11-1. Thus, OsSPO11-1 is essential for both homologous chromosomes pairing and crossover formation during meiosis in rice.     

A component of C. elegans meiotic chromosome axes at the interface of homolog alignment, synapsis, nuclear reorganization, and recombination

A universal feature of meiotic prophase is the pairing of homologous chromosomes, a fundamental prerequisite for the successful completion of all subsequent meiotic events. HIM-3 is a Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis-specific non-cohesin component of chromosome axes that is required for synapsis. Our characterization of new him-3 alleles reveals previously unknown functions for the protein. HIM-3 is required for the establishment of initial contacts between homologs, for the nuclear reorganization characteristic of early meiotic prophase, and for the coordination of these events with synaptonemal complex (SC) assembly. Despite the absence of homolog alignment, we find that recombination is initiated efficiently, indicating that initial pairing is not a prerequisite for early steps of the recombination pathway. Surprisingly, RAD-51-marked recombination intermediates disappear with apparent wild-type kinetics in him-3 null mutants in which homologs are spatially unavailable for recombination, raising the possibility that HIM-3's presence at chromosome axes inhibits the use of sister chromatids as templates for repair. We propose that HIM-3 is a molecular link between multiple landmark events of meiotic prophase; it is critical for establishing chromosome identity by configuring homologs to facilitate their recognition while simultaneously imposing structural constraints that later promote the formation of the crossover essential for proper segregation.     

The meiotic prophase in Bombyx mori females analyzed by three-dimensional reconstructions of synaptonemal complexes

Serial sectioning followed by three dimensional reconstruction of lateral components of the synaptonemal complex have been used to follow chromosome pairing during the prophase of the achiasmatic meiotic division in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. During leptotene and early zygotene, the lateral components become attached to the nuclear envelope at a specific region, thus forming a chromosome bouquet. The attachment of lateral components to the nuclear envelope precedes the completion of the components between their attachment points. Synapsis and synaptonemal complex formation start during the period of lateral component organization in the individual nucleus. Telomeric movements on the nuclear envelope occur at two stages of the prophase: the chromosome pairing appears to be initiated by an association of unpaired ends of homologous chromosomes, the nature of this primary attraction and recognition being unknown. Secondly, the paired chromosomes become dispersed in the nucleus by shifting of attachment sites of completed synaptonemal complexes at the end of zygotene. This movement is possibly related to a membrane flow occurring during this stage. Membrane material is synthesized at the region of synaptonemal complex attachment. Later, the excess membrane material is shifted to the opposite pole where it protrudes into the lumen of the nuclei thus forming vacuoles. — Two previously undescribed features of chromosome pairing were revealed. In late zygotene, chromosome pairing and synaptonemal complex formation were frequently observed to be delayed or even prevented over a short distance by interlocking of two bivalents, both being attached to the nuclear envelope. Such interlocking of bivalents was not found in pachytene. Secondly, one nucleus was found in which two homologous chromosomes were totally unpaired while the remaining 27 bivalents were completed or in a progressed state of pairing. The lateral components of the two unpaired chromosomes had the same length and were located several microns apart, thus eliminating the possibility of a permanent association of homologous chromosomes before the onset of meiosis in Bombyx mori females. — During pachytene, one of the 8 cells belonging to the syncytial cell cluster characteristic of oogenesis continues the meiotic prophase whereas the remaining 7 cells, the nurse cells, enter a different developmental sequence, finally resulting in their degeneration. The synaptonemal complex of the oocyte develops into a sausage-like structure after pachytene by a deposition of dense material onto the lateral components, thus filling out most of the central region. The diameter of this modified synaptonemal complex reaches at least 300 nm, as compaired to a pachytene width of approximately 130 nm. Also, the length of synaptonemal complexes increases from 212 at zygotene/pachytene to at least 300 at the modified pachytene stage. In nurse cells, synaptonemal complexes are shed from the bivalents shortly after pachytene simultaneously with a condensation of the chromatin. These free synaptonemal complex fragments associate and form various aggregates, either more or less normal looking polycomplexes or various complex figures formed by reorganized synaptonemal complex subunits. Later stages have not been included in the present investigation.     

Hop1: A Yeast Meiotic Pairing Gene

The recessive mutation, hop1-1, was isolated by use of a screen designed to detect mutations defective in homologous chromosomal pairing during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutants in HOP1 displayed decreased levels of meiotic crossing over and intragenic recombination between markers on homologous chromosomes. In contrast, assays of the hop1-1 mutation in a spo13-1 haploid disomic for chromosome III demonstrated that intrachromosomal recombination between directly duplicated sequences was unaffected. The spores produced by SPO13 diploids homozygous for hop1 were largely inviable, as expected for a defect in interhomolog recombination that results in high levels of nondisjunction. HOP1 was cloned by complementation of the spore lethality phenotype and the cloned gene was used to map HOP1 to the LYS11-HIS6 interval on the left arm of chromosome IX. Electron microscopy revealed that diploids homozygous for hop1 fail to form synaptonemal complex, which normally provides the structural basis for homolog pairing. We propose that HOP1 acts in meiosis primarily to promote chromosomal pairing, perhaps by encoding a component of the synaptonemal complex.     

The evolution of meiosis.

Meiosis is too complex to have arisen at once full blown and a stepwise scheme is proposed for its evolution, where each step is believed to have provided an immediate selective advantage: (1) The first step in this tentative sequence is the development of a haploidization process by means of a rapid series of mitotic non-disjunctions, turned on under conditions where haploidy is favored. The non-disjunctions may have resulted from a conditional mutation which caused sister centromere cohesiveness in the past mitotic metaphase. (2) Next probably came the formation of rudimentary synaptonemal complex type structures, first at Holliday-type configurations and later extending from these along chromosome pairs. These structures between homologues, though costly to produce and maintain, may have directly served the disjunctive function by setting the stage for the production of haploidy in one division, under conditions where it was advantageous. (3) Then secondarily acquired functions of the synaptonemal complex or structures associated with it may have promoted greatly increased crossover frequency, in part at least by increasing the frequency of the isomerization-type reaction. The resulting recombination of linked genes could have been advantageous under some conditions. (4) Finally, it is proposed that the capability was acquired for enhanced association of sister chromatids during the period between pachytene and anaphase I to give rise to chiasma-mediated disjunction, so that the relatively costly synaptonemal complex maintenance until anaphase I could be abandoned without losing disjunctive capability. It is implied that the modern synaptonemal complex is a structure which embodies a number of separately encoded proteins and that secondary structures and functions are associated with close homologue pairing. This scheme is based upon observable cytological and molecular characteristics of modern organisms.     

Chromosome structure and pairing preferences in autotetraploid rye (Secale cereale).

The influence of chromosome structure upon pairing behaviour during meiosis was investigated by comparing four autotetraploid genotypes of rye (Secale cereale) containing homologous chromosome sets with different degrees of structural similarity. The series provided a range of genotypes that, at one extreme, contained structurally identical chromosome sets and, at the other extreme, sets that are certainly more heterozygous in the genic sense and probably also more diverse from a purely structural viewpoint. Relative frequencies of pairing configurations at meiotic prophase and metaphase I were compared by electron microscopy of whole-mount surface-spread synaptonemal complex complements and light microscopy of squash preparations. Despite unexpectedly low quadrivalent frequencies over all four genotypes, higher mean bivalent frequencies appeared to be associated with greater homologue diversity. In other words, greater structural divergence between chromosome sets appears to facilitate more efficient discrimination between homologous and identical chromosomes that drives the formation of bivalents. Statistical comparisons were not able to confirm in some cases the significance of the observed pattern of pairing behaviour.     

Synaptic adjustment,non-homologous pairing,and non-pairing of homologous segments in sex chromosome mutants of Ephestia kuehniella (Insecta,Lepidoptera)

Microspread pachytene nuclei of wild-type and W chromosome mutants of the mealmoth Ephestia kuehniella were used to study synaptonemal complex (SC) formation. In structurally heterozygous bivalents, axial elements of considerable length differences were brought to the same length by synaptic adjustment. The adjustment length was a compromise between the mutant and the wildtype homologue length in a structural heterozygote of a W chromosome-autosome translocation, T(A; W). The translocated non-homologous W segment really participated in SC formation as could be seen from the W chromosomal heterochromatin, used as a cytogenetic marker. Pachytene pairing of the wild-type W-Z bivalent extended from about two-thirds to the full length of the W chromosome, though from cytogenetic and genetic evidence W and Z are largely — if not completely — non-homologous. Nonhomologous pairing was even more conspicuous in sex chromosome bivalents containing a deleted W chromosome, Df(W). In one of the pairing configurations the halves of the Z chromosome were synapsed to either side of the Df(W). Thus, one side was pairing with the Df(W) in reversed order. The pairing behavior of the W with homologous chromosome segments was tested by introducing supernumerary W segments via the T(A; W) translocation. Pairing between the W and the translocated homologous W segment never occurred, whereas the Z frequently synapsed with it. Even in T(A; W) homozygotes, pairing between the two translocated W segments was not regularly found while the autosomal parts of the translocation chromosomes were always completely paired. Homologous chromosomes and the ability to form an SC are not sufficient for pairing initiation. Specific loci or sequences are postulated for this function. They are either absent from the W chromosome or are present in only low concentrations.     

Evidence That Masking of Synapsis Imperfections Counterbalances Quality Control to Promote Efficient Meiosis

Reduction in ploidy to generate haploid gametes during sexual reproduction is accomplished by the specialized cell division program of meiosis. Pairing between homologous chromosomes and assembly of the synaptonemal complex at their interface (synapsis) represent intermediate steps in the meiotic program that are essential to form crossover recombination-based linkages between homologs, which in turn enable segregation of the homologs to opposite poles at the meiosis I division. Here, we challenge the mechanisms of pairing and synapsis during C. elegans meiosis by disrupting the normal 1∶1 correspondence between homologs through karyotype manipulation. Using a combination of cytological tools, including S-phase labeling to specifically identify X chromosome territories in highly synchronous cohorts of nuclei and 3D rendering to visualize meiotic chromosome structures and organization, our analysis of trisomic (triplo-X) and polyploid meiosis provides insight into the principles governing pairing and synapsis and how the meiotic program is “wired” to maximize successful sexual reproduction. We show that chromosomes sort into homologous groups regardless of chromosome number, then preferentially achieve pairwise synapsis during a period of active chromosome mobilization. Further, comparisons of synapsis configurations in triplo-X germ cells that are proficient or defective for initiating recombination suggest a role for recombination in restricting chromosomal interactions to a pairwise state. Increased numbers of homologs prolong markers of the chromosome mobilization phase and/or boost germline apoptosis, consistent with triggering quality control mechanisms that promote resolution of synapsis problems and/or cull meiocytes containing synapsis defects. However, we also uncover evidence for the existence of mechanisms that “mask” defects, thus allowing resumption of prophase progression and survival of germ cells despite some asynapsis. We propose that coupling of saturable masking mechanisms with stringent quality controls maximizes meiotic success by making progression and survival dependent on achieving a level of synapsis sufficient for crossover formation without requiring perfect synapsis.     

HAL-2 Promotes Homologous Pairing during Caenorhabditis elegans Meiosis by Antagonizing Inhibitory Effects of Synaptonemal Complex Precursors

During meiosis, chromosomes align with their homologous pairing partners and stabilize this alignment through assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC). Since the SC assembles cooperatively yet is indifferent to homology, pairing and SC assembly must be tightly coordinated. We identify HAL-2 as a key mediator in this coordination, showing that HAL-2 promotes pairing largely by preventing detrimental effects of SC precursors (SYP proteins). hal-2 mutants fail to establish pairing and lack multiple markers of chromosome movement mediated by pairing centers (PCs), chromosome sites that link chromosomes to cytoplasmic microtubules through nuclear envelope-spanning complexes. Moreover, SYP proteins load inappropriately along individual unpaired chromosomes in hal-2 mutants, and markers of PC-dependent movement and function are restored in hal-2; syp double mutants. These and other data indicate that SYP proteins can impede pairing and that HAL-2 promotes pairing predominantly but not exclusively by counteracting this inhibition, thereby enabling activation and regulation of PC function. HAL-2 concentrates in the germ cell nucleoplasm and colocalizes with SYP proteins in nuclear aggregates when SC assembly is prevented. We propose that HAL-2 functions to shepherd SYP proteins prior to licensing of SC assembly, preventing untimely interactions between SC precursors and chromosomes and allowing sufficient accumulation of precursors for rapid cooperative assembly upon homology verification.