Activation of the Inositol (1,4,5)-Triphosphate Calcium Gate Receptor Is Required for HIV-1 Gag Release

The structural precursor polyprotein, Gag, encoded by all retroviruses, including the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), is necessary and sufficient for the assembly and release of particles that morphologically resemble immature virus particles. Previous studies have shown that the addition of Ca²⁺ to cells expressing Gag enhances virus particle production. However, no specific cellular factor has been implicated as mediator of Ca²⁺ provision. The inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphate receptor (IP3R) gates intracellular Ca²⁺ stores. Following activation by binding of its ligand, IP3, it releases Ca²⁺ from the stores. We demonstrate here that IP3R function is required for efficient release of HIV-1 virus particles. Depletion of IP3R by small interfering RNA, sequestration of its activating ligand by expression of a mutated fragment of IP3R that binds IP3 with very high affinity, or blocking formation of the ligand by inhibiting phospholipase C-mediated hydrolysis of the precursor, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate, inhibited Gag particle release. These disruptions, as well as interference with ligand-receptor interaction using antibody targeted to the ligand-binding site on IP3R, blocked plasma membrane accumulation of Gag. These findings identify IP3R as a new determinant in HIV-1 trafficking during Gag assembly and introduce IP3R-regulated Ca²⁺ signaling as a potential novel cofactor in viral particle release.Assembly of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is determined by a single gene that encodes a structural polyprotein precursor, Gag (71), and may occur at the plasma membrane or within late endosomes/multivesicular bodies (LE/MVB) (7, 48, 58; reviewed in reference 9). Irrespective of where assembly occurs, the assembled particle is released from the plasma membrane of the host cell. Release of Gag as virus-like particles (VLPs) requires the C-terminal p6 region of the protein (18, 19), which contains binding sites for Alix (60, 68) and Tsg101 (17, 37, 38, 41, 67, 68). Efficient release of virus particles requires Gag interaction with Alix and Tsg101. Alix and Tsg101 normally function to sort cargo proteins to LE/MVB for lysosomal degradation (5, 15, 29, 52). Previous studies have shown that addition of ionomycin, a calcium ionophore, and CaCl₂ to the culture medium of cells expressing Gag or virus enhances particle production (20, 48). This is an intriguing observation, given the well-documented positive role for Ca²⁺ in exocytotic events (33, 56). It is unclear which cellular factors might regulate calcium availability for the virus release process.Local and global elevations in the cytosolic Ca²⁺ level are achieved by ion release from intracellular stores and by influx from the extracellular milieu (reviewed in reference 3). The major intracellular Ca²⁺ store is the endoplasmic reticulum (ER); stores also exist in MVB and the nucleus. Ca²⁺ release is regulated by transmembrane channels on the Ca²⁺ store membrane that are formed by tetramers of inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphate receptor (IP3R) proteins (reviewed in references 39, 47, and 66). The bulk of IP3R channels mediate release of Ca²⁺ from the ER, the emptying of which signals Ca²⁺ influx (39, 51, 57, 66). The few IP3R channels on the plasma membrane have been shown to be functional as well (13). Through proteomic analysis, we identified IP3R as a cellular protein that was enriched in a previously described membrane fraction (18) which, in subsequent membrane floatation analyses, reproducibly cofractionated with Gag and was enriched in the membrane fraction only when Gag was expressed. That IP3R is a major regulator of cytosolic calcium concentration (Ca²⁺) is well documented (39, 47, 66). An IP3R-mediated rise in cytosolic Ca²⁺ requires activation of the receptor by a ligand, inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphate (IP3), which is produced when phospholipase C (PLC) hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate [PI(4,5)P₂] at the plasma membrane (16, 25, 54). Paradoxically, PI(4,5)P₂ binds to the matrix (MA) domain in Gag (8, 55, 59), and the interaction targets Gag to PI(4,5)P₂-enriched regions on the plasma membrane; these events are required for virus release (45). We hypothesized that PI(4,5)P₂ binding might serve to target Gag to plasma membrane sites of localized Ca²⁺ elevation resulting from PLC-mediated PI(4,5)P₂ hydrolysis and IP3R activation. This idea prompted us to investigate the role of IP3R in Gag function.Here, we show that HIV-1 Gag requires steady-state levels of IP3R for its efficient release. Three isoforms of IP3R, types 1, 2, and 3, are encoded in three independent genes (39, 47). Types 1 and 3 are expressed in a variety of cells and have been studied most extensively (22, 39, 47, 73). Depletion of the major isoforms in HeLa or COS-1 cells by small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibited viral particle release. Moreover, we show that sequestration of the IP3R activating ligand or blocking ligand formation also inhibited Gag particle release. The above perturbations, as well as interfering with receptor expression or activation, led to reduced Gag accumulation at the cell periphery. The results support the conclusion that IP3R activation is required for efficient HIV-1 viral particle release.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation Remodels the Plasma Membrane Lipid Environment To Induce Nanocluster Formation

Signal transduction is regulated by the lateral segregation of proteins into nanodomains on the plasma membrane. However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the lateral segregation of cell surface receptors, such as receptor tyrosine kinases, upon ligand binding are unresolved. Here we used high-resolution spatial mapping to investigate the plasma membrane nanoscale organization of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR). Our data demonstrate that in serum-starved cells, the EGFR exists in preformed, cholesterol-dependent, actin-independent nanoclusters. Following stimulation with EGF, the number and size of EGFR nanoclusters increase in a time-dependent manner. Our data show that the formation of EGFR nanoclusters requires receptor tyrosine kinase activity. Critically, we show for the first time that production of phosphatidic acid by phospholipase D2 (PLD2) is essential for ligand-induced EGFR nanocluster formation. In accordance with its crucial role in regulating EGFR nanocluster formation, we demonstrate that modulating PLD2 activity tunes the degree of EGFR nanocluster formation and mitogen-activated protein kinase signal output. Together, these data show that EGFR activation drives the formation of signaling domains by regulating the production of critical second-messenger lipids and modifying the local membrane lipid environment.The epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) is a single transmembrane domain protein that possesses intrinsic tyrosine kinase (TK) activity. Ligand binding to the extracellular domain induces conformational changes that promote activation of the intracellular TK domain. The kinase domain then autophosphorylates a number of tyrosine residues in the C-terminal region of the protein, creating docking sites for adapter and effector proteins. Thus, the active form of the EGFR could reasonably be expected to be a dimer. However, recent studies using single-molecule imaging, image correlation spectroscopy (ICS), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), and immunoelectron microscopy (immuno-EM) show that the EGFR is, in fact, nonrandomly organized into oligomers on the plasma membrane (6, 7, 16, 34, 44). ICS measurements estimate that, in the absence of ligand, there are, on average, 2.2 EGFRs per cluster, which increases to 3.7 receptors per cluster upon stimulation (7). Single-molecule tracking experiments also suggest that unliganded EGFRs continually fluctuate between monomers and dimers that are primed for activation (5). Furthermore, the organization of the EGFR is dynamic and clustering of the EGFR increases over time after EGF stimulation (7, 16). However, neither the precise role of EGFR oligomerization in signal transduction nor the mechanisms driving oligomer formation have been resolved.The organization of the EGFR into oligomers is dependent upon cellular cholesterol. Saffarian et al., using FCS, estimated that 70% of EGFRs exist as monomers, 20% as dimers, and 10% as oligomers (34). However, depletion of cholesterol decreases the percentage of monomeric receptors and increases the proportion of oligomeric receptors. Cholesterol depletion and actin depolymerization also alter the diffusion coefficient of the EGFR and the confinement area size (22). The finding that EGFR membrane organization is dependent upon cholesterol is of particular interest because a number of studies have demonstrated that EGFR activity is negatively regulated by cholesterol (4, 23, 28, 32).Phospholipase D2 (PLD2) hydrolyzes phosphatidylcholine (PC) to produce choline and phosphatidic acid (PA). PLD2 is localized to the plasma membrane (10), associates with the EGFR (39), and is rapidly activated upon EGF stimulation, leading to increased production of PA (15, 38, 39). A number of lines of evidence suggest that PA is an important mediator of EGFR action. First, exogenous PA is mitogenic when incubated with cells (17, 19, 42, 45). Second, direct interaction with membrane PA regulates the activity of a number of components downstream of the EGFR, including Sos (47) and Raf (12, 13, 30, 31).In the current study, we used high-resolution spatial analysis techniques to investigate EGFR plasma membrane organization. Using these approaches, we identified PA as the key molecular component responsible for driving EGFR nanocluster formation in response to EGF binding and demonstrated that the level of PLD2 activity regulates the duration of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signal output.     

Trafficking of UL37 Proteins into Mitochondrion-Associated Membranes during Permissive Human Cytomegalovirus Infection

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 proteins traffic sequentially from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the mitochondria. In transiently transfected cells, UL37 proteins traffic into the mitochondrion-associated membranes (MAM), the site of contact between the ER and mitochondria. In HCMV-infected cells, the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, trafficked into the ER, the MAM, and the mitochondria. Surprisingly, a component of the MAM calcium signaling junction complex, cytosolic Grp75, was increasingly enriched in heavy MAM from HCMV-infected cells. These studies show the first documented case of a herpesvirus protein, HCMV pUL37x1, trafficking into the MAM during permissive infection and HCMV-induced alteration of the MAM protein composition.The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) UL37 immediate early (IE) locus expresses multiple products, including the predominant UL37 exon 1 protein, pUL37x1, also known as viral mitochondrion-localized inhibitor of apoptosis (vMIA), during lytic infection (16, 22, 24, 39, 44). The UL37 glycoprotein (gpUL37) shares UL37x1 sequences and is internally cleaved, generating pUL37_NH2 and gpUL37_COOH (2, 22, 25, 26). pUL37x1 is essential for the growth of HCMV in humans (17) and for the growth of primary HCMV strains (20) and strain AD169 (14, 35, 39, 49) but not strain TownevarATCC in permissive human fibroblasts (HFFs) (27).pUL37x1 induces calcium (Ca²⁺) efflux from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (39), regulates viral early gene expression (5, 10), disrupts F-actin (34, 39), recruits and inactivates Bax at the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) (4, 31-33), and inhibits mitochondrial serine protease at late times of infection (28).Intriguingly, HCMV UL37 proteins localize dually in the ER and in the mitochondria (2, 9, 16, 17, 24-26). In contrast to other characterized, similarly localized proteins (3, 6, 11, 23, 30, 38), dual-trafficking UL37 proteins are noncompetitive and sequential, as an uncleaved gpUL37 mutant protein is ER translocated, N-glycosylated, and then imported into the mitochondria (24, 26).Ninety-nine percent of ∼1,000 mitochondrial proteins are synthesized in the cytosol and directly imported into the mitochondria (13). However, the mitochondrial import of ER-synthesized proteins is poorly understood. One potential pathway is the use of the mitochondrion-associated membrane (MAM) as a transfer waypoint. The MAM is a specialized ER subdomain enriched in lipid-synthetic enzymes, lipid-associated proteins, such as sigma-1 receptor, and chaperones (18, 45). The MAM, the site of contact between the ER and the mitochondria, permits the translocation of membrane-bound lipids, including ceramide, between the two organelles (40). The MAM also provides enriched Ca²⁺ microdomains for mitochondrial signaling (15, 36, 37, 43, 48). One macromolecular MAM complex involved in efficient ER-to-mitochondrion Ca²⁺ transfer is comprised of ER-bound inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor 3 (IP3R3), cytosolic Grp75, and a MOM-localized voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) (42). Another MAM-stabilizing protein complex utilizes mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) to tether ER and mitochondrial organelles together (12).HCMV UL37 proteins traffic into the MAM of transiently transfected HFFs and HeLa cells, directed by their NH₂-terminal leaders (8, 47). To determine whether the MAM is targeted by UL37 proteins during infection, we fractionated HCMV-infected cells and examined pUL37x1 trafficking in microsomes, mitochondria, and the MAM throughout all temporal phases of infection. Because MAM domains physically bridge two organelles, multiple markers were employed to verify the purity and identity of the fractions (7, 8, 19, 46, 47).(These studies were performed in part by Chad Williamson in partial fulfillment of his doctoral studies in the Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Program at George Washington Institute of Biomedical Sciences.)HFFs and life-extended (LE)-HFFs were grown and not infected or infected with HCMV (strain AD169) at a multiplicity of 3 PFU/cell as previously described (8, 26, 47). Heavy (6,300 × g) and light (100,000 × g) MAM fractions, mitochondria, and microsomes were isolated at various times of infection and quantified as described previously (7, 8, 47). Ten- or 20-μg amounts of total lysate or of subcellular fractions were resolved by SDS-PAGE in 4 to 12% Bis-Tris NuPage gels (Invitrogen) and examined by Western analyses (7, 8, 26). Twenty-microgram amounts of the fractions were not treated or treated with proteinase K (3 μg) for 20 min on ice, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and probed by Western analysis. The blots were probed with rabbit anti-UL37x1 antiserum (DC35), goat anti-dolichyl phosphate mannose synthase 1 (DPM1), goat anti-COX2 (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), mouse anti-Grp75 (StressGen Biotechnologies), and the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (8, 47). Reactive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Pierce), and images were digitized as described previously (26, 47).     

The Receptor Complex Associated with Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 3 (HTLV-3) Env-Mediated Binding and Entry Is Distinct from,but Overlaps with,the Receptor Complexes of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2

Little is known about the transmission or tropism of the newly discovered human retrovirus, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 3 (HTLV-3). Here, we examine the entry requirements of HTLV-3 using independently expressed Env proteins. We observed that HTLV-3 surface glycoprotein (SU) binds efficiently to both activated CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells. This contrasts with both HTLV-1 SU, which primarily binds to activated CD4⁺ T cells, and HTLV-2 SU, which primarily binds to activated CD8⁺ T cells. Binding studies with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), two molecules important for HTLV-1 entry, revealed that these molecules also enhance HTLV-3 SU binding. However, unlike HTLV-1 SU, HTLV-3 SU can bind efficiently in the absence of both HSPGs and NRP-1. Studies of entry performed with HTLV-3 Env-pseudotyped viruses together with SU binding studies revealed that, for HTLV-1, glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) functions at a postbinding step during HTLV-3 Env-mediated entry. Further studies revealed that HTLV-3 SU binds efficiently to naïve CD4⁺ T cells, which do not bind either HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 SU and do not express detectable levels of HSPGs, NRP-1, and GLUT-1. These results indicate that the complex of receptor molecules used by HTLV-3 to bind to primary T lymphocytes differs from that of both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.The primate T-cell lymphotropic virus (PTLV) group of deltaretroviruses consists of three types of human T-cell lymphotropic viruses (HTLVs) (HTLV-1, HTLV-2, HTLV-3), their closely related simian T-cell lymphotropic viruses (STLVs) (STLV-1, STLV-2, STLV-3), an HTLV (HTLV-4) for which a simian counterpart has not been yet identified, and an STLV (STLV-5) originally described as a divergent STLV-1 (5-7, 30, 35, 37, 38, 45, 51, 53). HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, which have a 70% nucleotide homology, differ in both their pathobiology and tropism (reviewed in reference 13). While HTLV-1 causes a neurological disorder (tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-1-associated myelopathy) and a hematological disease (adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma) (15, 42, 55), HTLV-2 is only rarely associated with tropical spastic paraparesis/HTLV-1-associated myelopathy-like disease and is not definitively linked to any lymphoproliferative disease (12, 20). In vivo, both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infect T cells. Although HTLV-1 is primarily found in CD4⁺ T cells, other cell types in the peripheral blood of infected individuals have been found to contain HTLV-1, including CD8⁺ T cells, dendritic cells, and B cells (19, 29, 33, 36, 46).Binding and entry of retroviruses requires specific interactions between the Env glycoproteins on the virus and cell surface receptor complexes on target cells. For HTLV-1, three molecules have been identified as important for entry, as follows: heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) (16, 22, 26, 28, 29, 34, 39, 44). Recent studies support a model in which HSPG and NRP-1 function during the initial binding of HTLV-1 to target cells, and GLUT-1 functions at a postattachment stage, most likely to facilitate fusion (29, 34, 49). Efficient HTLV-2 binding and entry requires NRP-1 and GLUT-1 but not HSPGs (16, 26, 39, 49).This difference in the molecules required for binding to target cells reflects differences in the T-cell tropisms of these two viruses. Activated CD4⁺ T cells express much higher levels of HSPGs than CD8⁺ T cells (26). In infected individuals, HTLV-1 is primarily found in CD4⁺ T cells, while HTLV-2 is primarily found in CD8⁺ T cells (21, 43, 46). In vitro, HTLV-1 preferentially transforms CD4⁺ T cells while HTLV-2 preferentially transforms CD8⁺ T cells, and this difference has been mapped to the Env proteins (54).We and others have reported the discovery of HTLV-3 in two Cameroonese inhabitants (6, 7, 53). We recently uncovered the presence of a third HTLV-3 strain in a different population living several hundred kilometers away from the previously identified groups (5), suggesting that this virus may be common in central Africa. Since the HTLV-3 sequences were obtained by PCR amplification of DNA isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of infected individuals, little is known about its tropism and pathobiology in vivo. Based on the correlation between HSPG expression levels and viral tropisms of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, we reasoned that knowledge about the HTLV-3 receptors might provide insight into the tropism of this virus. We therefore generated vectors expressing HTLV-3 Env proteins and used them to begin to characterize the receptor complex used by HTLV-3 to bind and enter cells.     

Tryptophan Residues in the Portal Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Critical to the Interaction with Scaffold Proteins and Incorporation of the Portal into Capsids

Incorporation of the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) portal vertex into the capsid requires interaction with a 12-amino-acid hydrophobic domain within capsid scaffold proteins. The goal of this work was to identify domains and residues in the U_L6-encoded portal protein pU_L6 critical to the interaction with scaffold proteins. We show that whereas the wild-type portal and scaffold proteins readily coimmunoprecipitated with one another in the absence of other viral proteins, truncation beyond the first 18 or last 36 amino acids of the portal protein precluded this coimmunoprecipitation. The coimmunoprecipitation was also precluded by mutation of conserved tryptophan (W) residues to alanine (A) at positions 27, 90, 127, 163, 241, 262, 532, and 596 of U_L6. All of these W-to-A mutations precluded the rescue of a viral deletion mutant lacking U_L6, except W163A, which supported replication poorly, and W596A, which fully rescued replication. A recombinant virus bearing the W596A mutation replicated and packaged DNA normally, and scaffold proteins readily coimmunoprecipitated with portal protein from lysates of infected cells. Thus, viral functions compensated for the W596A mutation''s detrimental effects on the portal-scaffold interaction seen during transient expression of portal and scaffold proteins. In contrast, the W27A mutation precluded portal-scaffold interactions in infected cell lysates, reduced the solubility of pU_L6, decreased incorporation of the portal into capsids, and abrogated viral-DNA cleavage and packaging.Immature herpesvirus capsids or procapsids consist of two shells: an inner shell, or scaffold, and an outer shell that is roughly spherical and largely composed of the major capsid protein VP5 (24, 38).The capsid scaffold consists of a mixture of the U_L26.5 and U_L26 gene products, with the U_L26.5 gene product (pU_L26.5, ICP35, or VP22a) being the most abundant (1, 12, 20, 21, 32, 38). The U_L26.5 open reading frame shares its coding frame and C terminus with the U_L26 gene but initiates at codon 307 of U_L26 (17). The extreme C termini of both VP22a and the UL26-encoded protein (pU_L26) interact with the N terminus of VP5 (7, 14, 26, 40, 41). Capsid assembly likely initiates when the portal binds VP5/VP22a and/or VP5/pU_L26 complexes (22, 25). The addition of more of these complexes to growing capsid shells eventually produces a closed sphere bearing a single portal. pU_L26 within the scaffold contains a protease that cleaves itself between amino acids 247 and 248, separating pU_L26 into an N-terminal protease domain called VP24 and a C-terminal domain termed VP21 (4, 5, 8, 9, 28, 42). The protease also cleaves 25 amino acids from pU_L26 and VP22a to release VP5 (5, 8, 9). VP21 and VP22a are replaced with DNA when the DNA is packaged (12, 29).When capsids undergo maturation, the outer protein shell angularizes to become icosahedral (13). One fivefold-symmetrical vertex in the angularized outer capsid shell is biochemically distinct from the other 11 and is called the portal vertex because it serves as the channel through which DNA is inserted as it is packaged (23). In herpes simplex virus (HSV), the portal vertex is composed of 12 copies of the portal protein encoded by U_L6 (2, 23, 39). We and others have shown that interactions between scaffold and portal proteins are critical for incorporation of the portal into the capsid (15, 33, 44, 45). Twelve amino acids of scaffold proteins are sufficient to interact with the portal protein, and tyrosine and proline resides within this domain are critical for the interaction with scaffold proteins and incorporation of the portal into capsids (45).One goal of the current study was to map domains and residues within the U_L6-encoded portal protein that mediate interaction with scaffold proteins. We show that the portal-scaffold interaction requires all but the first 18 and last 36 amino acids of pU_L6, as well as several tryptophan residues positioned throughout the portal protein.