A single amino acid substitution in sigma E affects its ability to bind core RNA polymerase.

We have examined the role of the most highly conserved region of bacterial RNA polymerase sigma factors by analyzing the effect of amino acid substitutions and small deletions in sigma E from Bacillus subtilis. sigma E is required for the production of endospores in B. subtilis but not for vegetative growth. Strains expressing each of several mutant forms of sigE were found to be deficient in their ability to form endospores. Single amino acid substitutions at positions 68 and 94 resulted in sigma factors that bind with less affinity to the core subunits of RNA polymerase. The substitution at position 68 did not affect the stability of the protein in B. subtilis; therefore, this substitution probably did not have large effects on the overall structure of the sigma factor. The substitution at position 68 probably defines a position in sigma E that closely contacts a subunit of RNA polymerase, while the substitution at position 94 may define a position that is important for protein stability or for binding to core RNA polymerase.     

Genetic suppression analysis of sigma E interaction with three promoters in sporulating Bacillus subtilis.

Genetic evidence suggests that the sigma (sigma) subunit of RNA polymerase determines the specificity of promoter utilization, by making sequence-specific contacts with DNA. We examined the effects of two single amino acid(aa) substitutions in sigma E on the utilization of mutated derivatives of three different promoters in sporulating Bacillus subtilis. We found allele-specific suppression of mutations in all three promoters by each aa substitution in sigma E. These results provide strong evidence that sigma E interacts with each of these promoters in vivo. Moreover, the specificity of suppression of the mutations by the aa substitutions in sigma E lead us to speculate that the Met124 of sigma E closely contacts two adjacent bp in the -10 region of the promoters.     

Genetic evidence for interaction of sigma A with two promoters in Bacillus subtilis.

The specificity of promoter binding by RNA polymerase is governed by the sigma subunit. Recent studies, in which single-amino-acid substitutions in sigma factors have been found to suppress the effects of specific base pair substitutions in promoters, support the model that these sigma factors make sequence-specific contacts with nucleotides at the -10 and -35 regions of promoters. We found that single-amino-acid substitutions in the putative -35 region and -10 region recognition domains of sigma A specifically suppressed the effects of mutations in the -35 and -10 regions, respectively, of two promoters that are expressed in exponentially growing Bacillus subtilis. These mutations change the specificity of sigma A, the primary sigma factor in growing B. subtilis, and demonstrate that this sigma factor interacts with promoters in a manner similar to that of its homolog in Escherichia coli, sigma 70. These mutant derivatives of sigma A also provide a tool that may be useful for determining whether sigma A uses specific promoters in vivo.     

Interactions between the Rhodobacter sphaeroides ECF sigma factor, sigma(E), and its anti-sigma factor, ChrR

Rhodobacter sphaeroides sigma(E) is a member of the extra cytoplasmic function sigma factor (ECF) family, whose members have been shown to regulate gene expression in response to a variety of signals. The functions of ECF family members are commonly regulated by a specific, reversible interaction with a cognate anti-sigma factor. In R.sphaeroides, sigma(E) activity is inhibited by ChrR, a member of a newly discovered family of zinc containing anti-sigma factors. We used gel filtration chromatography to gain insight into the mechanism by which ChrR inhibits sigma(E) activity. We found that formation of the sigma(E):ChrR complex inhibits the ability of sigma(E) to form a stable complex with core RNA polymerase. Since the sigma(E):ChrR complex inhibits the ability of the sigma factor to bind RNA polymerase, we sought to identify amino acid substitutions in sigma(E) that altered the sensitivity of this sigma factor to inhibition by ChrR. This analysis identified single amino acid changes in conserved region 2.1 of sigma(E) that either increased or decreased the sensitivity of sigma(E) for inhibition by ChrR. Many of the amino acid residues that alter the sensitivity of sigma(E) to ChrR are located within regions known to be important for interacting with core RNA polymerase in other members of the sigma(70) superfamily. Our results suggest a model where solvent-exposed residues with region 2.1 of sigma(E) interact with ChrR to sterically occlude this sigma factor from binding core RNA polymerase and to inhibit target gene expression.