S-adenosylmethionine activates adpA transcription and promotes streptomycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces griseus

Using a two-plasmid system, we recently identified sigma(E)-dependent promoters directing expression of the sigma(E) regulon genes in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium). Comparison of the promoters revealed a consensus sequence almost identical to the sigma(E)-dependent rpoEp3 promoter directing expression of rpoE. This two-plasmid system was previously optimized to identify nucleotides critical for the rpoEp3 promoter activity. However, two highly conserved nucleotides in the sigma(E) consensus sequence were not identified by this screening. In the present study, we have improved the two-plasmid screening system using a new optimized error-prone PCR mutagenesis. Together with site-directed mutagenesis, we further identified nucleotides critical for activity of the rpoEp3 promoter and quantified the effect of the particular mutation upon promoter activity. All the identified critical nucleotides of the rpoEp3 promoter (in capital) were located in the -35 (ggAACtt) and -10 (gTCtaA) regions and corresponded to the most conserved nucleotides in the sigma(E) consensus sequence. The expression of the wild-type and mutated rpoEp3 promoters was confirmed in S. Typhimurium and was found to exhibit a different pattern of sigma(E) activation compared with Escherichia coli, with a peak rpoEp3 promoter activity in early stationary phase followed by a decrease in late stationary phase.     

A two-plasmid system for identification of promoters recognized by RNA polymerase containing extracytoplasmic stress response sigma(E) in Escherichia coli

We have previously established a two-plasmid system in Escherichia coli for identification of promoters recognized by RNA polymerase containing a heterologous sigma factor. Attempts to optimize this system for identification of promoters recognized by RNA polymerase containing E. coli extracytoplasmic stress response sigma(E) failed owing to high toxicity of the expressed rpoE. A new system for identification of sigma(E)-cognate promoters was established, and verified using the two known sigma(E)-dependent promoters, rpoEp2 and degPp. Expression of the sigma(E)-encoding rpoE gene was under the control of the AraC-dependent P(BAD) promoter. A low level of arabinose induced a non-toxic, however, sufficient level of sigma(E) to interact with the core enzyme of RNA polymerase. Such an RNA polymerase holoenzyme recognized both known sigma(E)-dependent promoters, rpoEp2 and degPp, which were cloned in the compatible promoter probe plasmid, upstream of a promoterless lacZ alpha reporter gene. This new system has proved to be useful for identification of E. coli sigma(E)-cognate promoters. Moreover, the system could be used for identification of ECF sigma-cognate promoters from other bacteria.     

The structural basis of the high in vivo strength of the rRNA P2 promoter of Escherichia coli

Ribosomal RNA promoters of Escherichia coli are probably the strongest promoters in vivo and they can be used on plasmid vectors to express protein-coding sequences at a high rate. In fact, the P2 promoter of the rrnB gene is stronger (in vivo) than the tac promoter, which has a perfect consensus sequence. Conversion of the rrnB P2 promoter sequence to consensus significantly increases in vivo promoter strength. The removal of four nucleotides downstream of the -10 region also increases the strength of this promoter. On the other hand, shifting of the A + T-rich region upstream of this promoter by an 11-bp insertion drastically decreases in vivo activity. It is concluded that the two functionally important hexanucleotide sequences, -35 and -10, are necessary but not sufficient factors for the optimalization of in vivo promoter strength.