Taste preference synergy between glutamate receptor agonists and inosine monophosphate in rats

Monosodium glutamate (MSG) elicits a taste called umami and interacts synergistically with nucleotide monophosphates such as 5'-inosine monophosphate (IMP) to potentiate this taste intensity. Indeed, the synergistic interaction of nucleotide monophosphates and MSG is a hallmark of umami. We examined interactions between MSG and other taste stimuli, including IMP, by measuring the lick rates of non-deprived rats during 30 s trials. To control for non-linear psychophysical functions, the concentration of one taste stimulus in a binary mixture was systematically increased while the concentration of the second taste stimulus was decreased (stimulus substitution method). Synergy between two stimuli was detected if the lick rate for a binary mixture exceeded that expected from the sum of the lick rates for each stimulus alone. In initial experiments, taste synergy was observed when rats were presented with mixtures of MSG and IMP but not with mixtures of MSG and sucrose. In subsequent experiments, glutamate receptor agonists other than MSG were presented with IMP to test for taste synergy. No evidence of synergy was seen when rats were presented with mixtures of IMP and kainic acid or IMP and N:-methyl-D-aspartate. However, taste synergy between IMP and L-AP4, a potent agonist at mGluR4 receptors, was observed. These results suggest that a metabotropic glutamate receptor similar to mGluR4 may be involved in the taste synergy that characterizes umami.     

Differential covariation in taste responsiveness to bitter stimuli in rats

Variation exists in the sensitivity of individual rodents and humans to different bitter tastants. An absence of uniform correlation in responsiveness to different bitter substances across individuals within a species suggests heterogeneity in the mechanisms underlying stimulus processing within this taste modality. Here, we examined taste responsiveness of individual rats to three bitter compounds (quinine hydrochloride, denatonium benzoate, and cycloheximide) in short-term lick tests to determine the magnitude of covariation among responses to these stimuli and infer commonalities in their receptor and neural mechanisms. Rats were tested with a given pair of bitter stimuli during three sessions comprising randomized trial blocks of six concentrations of each stimulus + deionized water. Psychophysical functions were generated for individual rats for respective stimulus pairs, and concentrations of each stimulus that produced equivalent lick suppression relative to water were correlated across animals. Behavioral taste responsiveness to quinine hydrochloride strongly covaried with responsiveness to denatonium benzoate (r = +0.82). Lick responsiveness to quinine was less robustly correlated with that to cycloheximide (r = +0.44), and denatonium and cycloheximide responses failed to correlate. These results imply substantial overlap in the bitter taste coding mechanisms for quinine and denatonium but some degree of independence in the mechanisms responsible for gustatory processing of cycloheximide. More generally, these data reinforce the notion that bitter taste processing is not a homogeneous event.     

Taste psychophysics based on a simulation of human drinking

Taste stimulation during human drinking is approximated by alternatestimulation of the tongue with a stimulus liquid and a secondliquid. Such stimulation produces no significant sensory adaptationof taste, in contrast to continuous stimulation with the stimulusliquid. The absence of a reduction over time in judged tasteintensity holds up under variations in flow duration of thetwo liquids (1 sec to 3 sec), stimulus compound NaCl or Na-saccharin),stimulus concentration (2 mM Nasaccharin; 100 mM-500 mM NaCl),or subjects (29). Pulsatile, alternating taste stimulus presentationrepresents a model of taste relevant to human drinking. ¹With the technical assistance of D. Baron and L. Snyder.     

A brief-access test for bitter taste in mice

Inbred mouse strains vary in their response to bitter-tasting compounds as assessed by 48 h preference tests. These differences are generally assumed to result from altered gustatory function, although such long-term tests could easily reflect additional factors. We developed a brief-access taste test and tested the responses of two inbred strains, as well as C3. SW congenic mice, to the bitter stimulus sucrose octaacetate (SOA). Water-deprived trained mice were tested with five concentrations of SOA (0.00018-0.18 mM) and distilled water in a Davis MS- 160 apparatus. Trials were 5 s in duration and stimuli were presented randomly within blocks; each stimulus trial was preceded by a water rinse trial. Each concentration was presented twice in a session and mice were repeatedly tested across consecutive days. SOA-taster mice, including the SWR/J (SW) inbred and C3. SW congenic taster (T) mice, avoided licking SOA at concentrations >0.003 mM. In comparison, C3HeB/FeJ (C3) and C3. SW demitaster mice (D) licked all concentrations at the same rate as water. Concentration-response functions were similar across strains for both the brief-access test and a parallel 48 h preference test run on separate groups of mice. Furthermore, concentration-response functions were similar whether or not the brief-access test was preceded by a 4 day, single concentration pretest with SOA. The brief-access test is a suitable assay for bitter taste function in mice because it minimizes possible post-ingestive influences on taste.     

Taste judgments and gustatory stimulus duration: simple taste reaction times

Human simple taste reaction times to aqueous solutions of organicand inorganic molecules flowing across 39.3 mm² of the anterodorsaltongue were measured for stimulus durations of 50, 100, 300,1000 and 2000 ms. Median reaction times were >400 msand <850ms. Analyses of variance indicated that they differed acrossdurations for 2 mM Na-saccharin, 250 mM and 500 mM MgSO₄, 3.2mM HC1 and 214 mM monosodium glutamate. Pairwise comparisonsshowed significant differences between times to 50 or 100 msversus 2000 ms stimuli for these five solutions, but only forNa-saccharin and HC1 between 50 and 100 ms stimuli. Longer reactiontimes generally accompanied briefer durations. Simple tastereaction times did not differ across 50 ms through 2000 ms durationsfor 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM HCl or 2 mM Na-saccharin in 10 mM citricacid. A relationship between effective taste stimulus concentrationand sensitivity to stimulus duration is suggested. The lengthof taste reaction time, and the differences in reaction timebetween stimulus molecules, are attributed to central processingrather than receptor level events.     

Neural coding of gustatory information.

The nervous system encodes information relating chemical stimuli to taste perception, beginning with transduction mechanisms at the receptor and ending in the representation of stimulus attributes by the activity of neurons in the brain. Recent studies have rekindled the long-standing debate about whether taste information is coded by the pattern of activity across afferent neurons or by specifically tuned 'labeled lines'. Taste neurons are broadly tuned to stimuli representing different qualities and are also responsive to stimulus intensity and often to touch and temperature. Their responsiveness is also modulated by a number of physiological factors. In addition to representing stimulus quality and intensity, activity in taste neurons must code information about the hedonic value of gustatory stimuli. These considerations suggest that individual gustatory neurons contribute to the coding of more than one stimulus parameter, making the response of any one cell meaningful only in the context of the activity of its neighbors.     

Taste sensitivities to PROP and PTC vary independently in mice

Mammals use common mechanisms to detect, transduce and process taste stimulus information. For example, they share families of receptors that respond to amino acids, and sweet- and bitter-tasting stimuli. Nonetheless, it also clear that different species exhibit unique taste sensitivities that may reflect specific genetic variations. In humans, sensitivities to the chemically similar, bitter-tasting compounds 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) are heritable and strongly correlated, suggesting a common genetic basis. However, it is unknown whether PROP and PTC taste sensitivities are similarly correlated in mice. Here we report that PROP and PTC taste sensitivities vary independently between two inbred strains of mice. In brief-access taste tests C3HeB/FeJ (C3) and SWR/J (SW) mice possess similar taste sensitivity to PTC, while SW mice are significantly more sensitive to PROP than are C3 mice. In two-bottle preference tests, however, SW mice display greater aversion to both compounds. This discrepancy may be explained by the observation that SW mice consumed taste solutions at a greater rate during the intake test than did C3 mice. Therefore, PTC avoidance is correlated with the amount of PTC consumed in the intake tests rather than the concentration of PTC tested. These findings suggest that post-ingestive factors play a significant role in PTC avoidance during intake tests and highlight an important advantage of brief-access tests over intake tests in resolving the gustatory and post-ingestive contributions to taste-related behaviors. Most strikingly, these results demonstrate that in mice, unlike in humans, PTC and PROP taste sensitivities vary independently, thereby suggesting a subtle functional diversity of bitter-taste mechanisms across mammalian species.     

Epithelial responses to glycinamide and glycylglycinamide in the frog (Rana catesbeiana) tongue.

1. Open-circuit potential difference and short-circuit current across the frog tongue epithelium in response to glycinamide and glycylglycinamide were investigated. 2. Response to both of these amides were larger than the responses produced by glycine, glycylglycine and NaCl, and were independent of Na+ in the mucosal medium but dependent on H+ in the stimulus. 3. The relationships of the magnitudes of both response to the stimulus were similar to that in the taste nerve. 4. The results indicate that H+-dependent transport of these amides is related to taste reception in frogs.     

Time-intensity evaluation of acid taste in subjects with saliva high flow and low flow rates for acids of various chemical properties

The role of the chemical properties of sour stimuli and the role of the human saliva flow rate on acid perception were investigated in 11 high saliva flow rate (HF) and 11 low saliva flow rate (LF) subjects with a continuous stimulus delivery flow rate of 3.2 ml/min and using the time-intensity technique for perception recording. Continuously measuring the pH on the tongue surface on three HF and three LF subjects showed that HF subjects' saliva decreased the acidity of the acid solution more efficiently than the LF subjects' saliva did. However, HF subjects exhibited higher perceived intensity for acid solutions than LF subjects. At equal pH, the order of the efficiency of acids indicated that HCl was the least efficient acid stimulus and acetic acid the most efficient. At equal concentration, the order of efficiency was the opposite (citric acid > malic acid > lactic acid > acetic acid), indicating that titratable acidity rather than pH has to be considered when comparing weak acids. At high concentrations, the ratio of relative efficiency is more in favor of the hydrophobic than the hydrophilic acid in HF subjects compared with LF subjects, i.e. HF subjects are more sensitive to hydrophobic stimuli. Hydrophobic molecules may diffuse more easily into the epithelium of HF than LF subjects, and reach more efficiently trigeminal nerve endings in addition to taste receptor cells.     

Direct measurement of translingual epithelial NaCl and KCl currents during the chorda tympani taste response.

We have measured the NaCl or KCl currents under voltage clamp across the dorsal lingual epithelium of the rat and simultaneously the response of the taste nerves. Under short-circuit conditions a NaCl stimulus evoked an inward current (first current) that coincided with excitation of the chorda tympani. This was followed by a slower inward current (second current) that matched the kinetics of taste nerve adaptation. The peak first current and the coincident neural response satisfied the same saturating NaCl concentration dependence. Both first and second currents were partially blocked by amiloride as were the phasic and tonic components of the neural response. The NaCl-evoked second current was completely blocked by ouabain. Investigation of the NaCl-evoked current and the neural response over a range of clamped voltages showed that inward negative potentials enhanced the inward current and the neural response to 0.3 M NaCl. Sufficiently high inward positive potentials reversed the current, and made the neural response independent of further changes in voltage. Therefore, one of the NaCl taste transduction mechanisms is voltage dependent while the other is voltage independent. A KCl stimulus also evoked an inward short-circuit current, but this and the neural response were not amiloride-sensitive. The data indicate that neural adaptation to a NaCl stimulus, but not a KCl stimulus, is mediated by cell Na/K pumps. A model is proposed in which the connection between the NaCl-evoked second current and cell repolarization is demonstrated.     

Ongoing ingestive behavior is rapidly suppressed by a preabsorptive, intestinal "bitter taste" cue

The discovery that cells in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract express the same molecular receptors and intracellular signaling components known to be involved in taste has generated great interest in potential functions of such post-oral "taste" receptors in the control of food intake. To determine whether taste cues in the GI tract are detected and can directly influence behavior, the present study used a microbehavioral analysis of intake, in which rats drank from lickometers that were programmed to simultaneously deliver a brief yoked infusion of a taste stimulus to the intestines. Specifically, in daily 30-min sessions, thirsty rats with indwelling intraduodenal catheters were trained to drink hypotonic (0.12 M) sodium chloride (NaCl) and simultaneously self-infuse a 0.12 M NaCl solution. Once trained, in a subsequent series of intestinal taste probe trials, rats reduced licking during a 6-min infusion period, when a bitter stimulus denatonium benzoate (DB; 10 mM) was added to the NaCl vehicle for infusion, apparently conditioning a mild taste aversion. Presentation of the DB in isomolar lithium chloride (LiCl) for intestinal infusions accelerated the development of the response across trials and strengthened the temporal resolution of the early licking suppression in response to the arrival of the DB in the intestine. In an experiment to evaluate whether CCK is involved as a paracrine signal in transducing the intestinal taste of DB, the CCK-1R antagonist devazepide partially blocked the response to intestinal DB. In contrast to their ability to detect and avoid the bitter taste in the intestine, rats did not modify their licking to saccharin intraduodenal probe infusions. The intestinal taste aversion paradigm developed here provides a sensitive and effective protocol for evaluating which tastants-and concentrations of tastants-in the lumen of the gut can control ingestion.     

CROSS-MODAL ADDITIVITY OF TASTE AND SMELL

Subjects were simultaneously given subthreshold levels of taste and odor stimuli, delivered orally, for both a commonly paired and an uncommonly paired taste–odor combination. Results indicate cross‐modal summation of subthreshold concentrations of both taste–odor pairs when the olfactory stimulus is delivered orally. Results of control studies suggest that the summation was indeed across modalities, and not due to the taste of the odor compound or the smell of the taste compounds. Furthermore, results indicate that regardless of taste–odor pair commonness, taste and smell can combine in a completely additive fashion (i.e., at threshold detectability when both stimuli are presented simultaneously at 50% threshold level) if the taste–odor pair is presented orally. In several instances, but not all, measured probabilities exceeded those predicted by probability summation, indicating that hyperadditive mixing often occurs, but there do seem to be individual differences. Cross‐modal summation, regardless of taste–odor pair commonness, has broader implications for the development of foods, beverages and pharmaceuticals, especially in masking undesirable tastes and smells.     

Topographic distribution of taste responsiveness in the hamster medulla

The purpose of the present investigation was to map the multiunitresponsiveness of the gustatory portion of the nucleus of thesolitary tract (NTS) in the hamster, elicited by chemical stimulationof oral taste receptors. Neural responsiveness to four stimuli(0.1 M sucrose, 0.03 M NaCl, 0.003 M HCl, 0.001 M QHCl) deliveredto either the anterior tongue or other parts of the oral cavitywas examined at 37 NTS recording sites. Gustatory responseswere shown-to depend collectively upon the stimulus, the receptivearea being stimulated, and the location of the recording sitewithin the NTS. By comparing the proportional magnitudes ofintegrated responses across recording sites, unique topographicpatterns of responsiveness were demonstrated for sucrose, NaCIand QHCl. Responses to HCl and NaCl generated similar patterns.Further, the response patterns for each stimulus differed followingstimulation of the anterior tongue or posterior oral cavity.Spatial differences in NTS responsiveness arise as a resultof differences in peripheral gustatory nerve sensitivities andprovide a possible substrate for the coding of taste quality.     

Molecular Signals into the Insular Cortex and Amygdala During Aversive Gustatory Memory Formation

In this paper, we will provide evidence of the putative molecular signals and biochemical events that mediate the formation of long-lasting gustatory memory trace. When an animal drinks a novel taste (the conditioned stimulus; CS) and it is later associated with malaise (unconditioned stimulus; US), the animal will reject it in the next presentation, developing a long-lasting taste aversion, i.e., the taste cue becomes an aversive signal, and this is referred to as conditioning taste aversion. Different evidence indicates that the novel stimulus (taste) induces a rapid and strong cortical acetylcholine activity that decreases when the stimulus becomes familiar after several presentations. Cholinergic activation via muscarinic receptors initiates a series of intracellular events leading to plastic changes that could be related to short- and/or long-term memory gustatory trace. Such plastic changes facilitate the incoming US signals carried out by, in part, the glutamate release induced by the US. Altogether, these events could produce the cellular changes related to the switch from safe to aversive taste memory trace. A proposed working model to explain the biochemical sequence of signals during taste memory formation will be discussed.     

Basic taste stimuli elicit unique responses in facial skin blood flow

Facial expression changes characteristically with the emotions induced by basic tastes in humans. We tested the hypothesis that the five basic tastes also elicit unique responses in facial skin blood flow. Facial skin blood flow was measured using laser speckle flowgraphy in 16 healthy subjects before and during the application of basic taste stimuli in the oral cavity for 20 s. The skin blood flow in the eyelid increased in response to sweet and umami taste stimuli, while that in the nose decreased in response to a bitter stimulus. There was a significant correlation between the subjective hedonic scores accompanying these taste stimuli and the above changes in skin blood flow. These results demonstrate that sweet, umami, and bitter tastes induce unique changes in facial skin blood flow that reflect subjective hedonic scores.     

'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor

Individual differences in taste perception have been explained in part by variations in peripheral innervation associated with the genetic ability to taste the bitter substances PTC and PROP. In the present study we report evidence of another source of individual differences that is independent of taste stimulus, taste quality, or gustatory nerve. Individuals who perceived taste from thermal stimulation alone (thermal taste) gave significantly higher taste ratings to chemical stimuli--often by a factor of >2:1--than did individuals who perceived no taste from thermal stimulation. This was true for all taste stimuli tested (sucrose, saccharin, sodium chloride, citric acid, quinine sulfate, MSG and PROP), for all three gustatory areas of the mouth (anterior tongue, posterior tongue and soft palate) and for whole-mouth stimulation. Moreover, the same individuals reported stronger sensations from the olfactory stimulus vanillin, particularly when it was sensed retronasally. The generality of the thermal-taster advantage and its extension to an olfactory stimulus suggests that it arises from individual differences in CNS processes that are involved in perception of both taste and flavor.     

Influence of Stimulus Duration on a Regional Measure of NaCl Taste Sensitivity

The present study demonstrates that perithreshold temporal integrationoccurs in the human taste system across stimulus durations rangingfrom 200 to 1500 ms in a manner analogous to that seen in othermajor sensory systems. Thus, the notion that gustation is comparativelyinsensitive to temporal stimulus parameters at threshold levelsis disproved. Chem. Senses 22: 171–175, 1997.     

Selective removal of a target stimulus localized by taste in humans

Recent studies have shown that people can localize a punctate gustatory stimulus on the lingual epithelium in the absence of discriminative tactile cues. The present studies examined the human ability to localize taste sensations on the tongue and to use this information to remove selectively a target stimulus (a flavored, 1 cm(3) gelatin cube) from the mouth when presented with non-target distractors that vary in number and taste. Findings indicate that humans are capable of localizing and removing either an aversive or an appetitive gustatory target from a field of tactile distractors via taste sensations alone, although this ability diminishes as the number of distractors increases (implicating serial searches, rather than parallel). In addition, humans can localize and selectively remove a target taste in the presence of distractors of another distinct taste quality. Under these conditions performance is either unaffected or reduced, which indicates that contrast with the distinct taste of the distractors does not enhance performance. Humans also are capable of removing a nearly tasteless cube from a field of flavored distractors, but this is clearly a more difficult task, suggesting that 'tactile capture' of taste occurs for the tasteless target cube and interferes with the localization of taste. Finally, perceived suprathreshold stimulus intensity did not seem to be related to the ability to localize and remove a target stimulus via taste sensations and failed to account for variations in performance across individuals.     

Fat taste in humans: Sources of within- and between-subject variability

Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) are reportedly detectable through taste mechanisms in the human oral cavity. However, wide variability has been observed in NEFA taste sensitivity between and within subjects as well as across research groups. Some of this variability may be due to the hydrophobic nature of the NEFA and the methods used to make stimuli emulsions. As NEFA are poorly soluble in water, emulsification is necessary for delivery of stimuli to taste receptors. However, properties of emulsions may also be detected by somatosensory cues complicating attribution of sensory findings to taste. Additionally, learning (improved test performance) has been observed when using traditional tests for measuring sensitivity to NEFA, which may contribute greatly to within-subject variability if not standardized. Factors such as sex, diet, and BMI have been proposed to affect NEFA taste sensitivity, but the degree to which these individual factors influence NEFA detection thresholds remains to be fully established. Improved knowledge of stimulus properties and individual sensory capabilities will be needed to further evaluate the posited taste component to human oral fat detection. Progress in this area should facilitate the translation of findings on how NEFA taste may contribute to or reflect food choice and chronic disease risk.     

The organization of taste sensibilities in hamster chorda tympani nerve fibers

Electrophysiological measurements of nerve impulse frequencies were used to explore the organization of taste sensibilities in single fibers of the hamster chorda tympani nerve. Moderately intense taste solutions that are either very similar or easily discriminated were applied to the anterior lingual surface. 40 response profiles or 13 stimulus activation patterns were considered variables and examined with multivariate statistical techniques. Three kinds of response profiles were seen in fibers that varied in their overall sensitivity to taste solutions. One profile (S) showed selectivity for sweeteners, a second (N) showed selectivity for sodium salts, and a third (H) showed sensitivity to salts, acids, and other compounds. Hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that profiles fell into discrete classes. Responses to many pairs of effective stimuli were covariant across profiles within a class, but some acidic stimuli had more idiosyncratic effects. Factor analysis of profiles identified two common factors, accounting for 77% of the variance. A unipolar factor was identified with the N profile, and a bipolar factor was identified with the S profile and its opposite, the H profile. Three stimulus activation patterns were elicited by taste solutions that varied in intensity of effect. Hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that the patterns fell into discrete classes. Factor analysis of patterns identified three common unipolar factors accounting for 82% of the variance. Eight stimuli (MgSO4, NH4Cl, KCl, citric acid, acetic acid, urea, quinine HCl, HCl) selectively activated fibers with H profiles, three stimuli (fructose, Na saccharin, sucrose) selectively activated fibers with S profiles, and two stimuli (NaNO3, NaCl) activated fibers with N profiles more strongly than fibers with H profiles. Stimuli that evoke different patterns taste distinct to hamsters. Stimuli that evoke the same pattern taste more similar. It was concluded that the hundreds of peripheral taste neurons that innervate the anterior tongue play one of three functional roles, providing information about one of three features that are shared by different chemical solutions.