Prospective parallel randomized trial of the MultiCyte™ ThinPrep® imaging system: the Scottish experience

T.J. Palmer, S.M. Nicoll, M.E. McKean, A.J. Park, D. Bishop, L. Baker and J.E.A. Imrie
Prospective parallel randomized trial of the MultiCyte? ThinPrep^® imaging system: the Scottish experience Background: Computer‐assisted screening of cervical liquid‐based cytology (LBC) preparations using the ThinPrep® Imaging System (TIS) has shown improved qualitative and quantitative gains. The use of Multicyte? has not been described in a well‐established national screening programme with a low incidence of high‐grade dyskaryosis. Objectives: To assess the impact of computer‐assisted screening within the Scottish Cervical Screening Programme (SCSP). Methods: Two groups of three laboratories, each sharing a ThinPrep® Imager, screened 79 366 slides randomized to test and 90 551 to control arms by laboratory accession. Screeners were not blinded. Standard laboratory reporting profiles of the SCSP, sensitivity, specificity and false‐negative rates of all grades of LBC abnormalities with respect to final cytology reports, predictive value for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) on histology; and screening rates were compared for both arms. Results: Inadequate and negative reporting rates were significantly lower and low‐grade reporting rates significantly higher in the imager arm. Imager‐assisted screening showed significantly better specificity than manual screening with respect to the final cytology result. There was no evidence of a significant difference in the detection of CIN2 + or CIN3 + . Positive, abnormal and total predictive values (high‐grade, low‐grade and all abnormal cytology found to be CIN2 + , respectively) were similar in both arms. Productivity was significantly higher in the imager arm. Conclusion: Computer‐assisted screening in a well established screening programme showed significantly improved productivity without loss of quality. These findings should inform future policy for cervical screening programmes.     

Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?

K. Sigurdsson
Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear? Background: The comparative sensitivity of liquid‐based cytology (LBC) test and conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is controversial. Material and methods: This study analyses the distribution of cytology, histology, colposcopy and large loop excision of the transformation zone among women screened in Iceland with LBC at the Cancer Detection Clinic in Reykjavik and with a conventional Pap smear outside the Detection Clinic in 2007–2011. The study material included 42 654 LBC tests from 20 439 women and 103 909 Pap smears from 61 574 women. The period 2000–2004 is used to correct for potential bias as a result of unequal distribution of the studied parameters between the study sites before the introduction of LBC. Results: The observed results indicated that women screened with an LBC sample had significantly decreased detection rates of inadequate smears, increased detection of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)/atypical cytology and referrals to colposcopy, and an increased detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) irrespective of age. LBC increased significantly the detection rates of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+) cytology and CIN3+ histology only in women under 40 years of age. Taking into consideration the unequal prevalence of the studied parameters between the study sites in 2000–2004 indicated, however, that LBC only affected the rate of inadequate and low‐grade cytology tests under the age of 40 years. Positive predictive values for CIN2+ were not significantly different between the tests. Conclusions: The study results support the view that LBC is no more sensitive than Pap smears for the detection of HSIL+ and CIN2+ irrespective of age. LBC decreased the rate of inadequate smears, but increased the rate of low‐grade cytology under the age of 40 years and decreased the total rate of abnormal smears over the age of 40 years.     

Comparison of SurePath® and ThinPrep® liquid‐based cervical cytology using positive predictive value,atypical predictive value and total predictive value as performance indicators

P. K. Wright, J. Marshall and M. Desai Comparison of SurePath ^® and ThinPrep ^® liquid‐based cervical cytology using positive predictive value, atypical predictive value and total predictive value as performance indicators Objective: Two liquid‐based cytology (LBC) systems are in widespread use in the UK: ThinPrep^® and SurePath^®. A number of studies have now compared LBC with conventional cytology in cervical screening. However, to date, we are aware of no studies that have compared ThinPrep^® with SurePath^® LBC. As the selection and use of specific diagnostic systems in a laboratory has significant clinical and economic implications, there is a clear need to compare directly existing LBC technology. The objective of this study was to compare ThinPrep^® with SurePath^® LBC in a single cytology laboratory using performance indicators. Methods: Data were collected for all cervical cytology samples processed at Manchester Cytology Centre over a 1‐year period. ThinPrep^® LBC was compared with SurePath^® LBC using positive predictive value (PPV), atypical predictive value (APV) and total predictive value (TPV), reflecting outcome of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse for high‐grade dyskaryosis (PPV), low‐grade dyskaryosis or borderline (atypical) cytology (APV) and all (total) abnormal cytology (TPV). Results: 2287 (out of 56 467) (ThinPrep^®) and 586 (out of 22 824) (SurePath^®) samples showed borderline or worse cytology after exclusion criteria. PPV, APV and TPV were within acceptable ranges for both ThinPrep^® and SurePath^®. Conclusions: ThinPrep^® and SurePath^® were equivalent based on three performance indicators. We suggest that APV and TPV should be used as an adjunct to PPV and other methods of quality assurance for cervical screening.     

Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories

OBJECTIVE: Cervical screening programmes in England and Wales were advised by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in 2003 to adopt liquid-based cytology (LBC) in place of conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) cytology to facilitate laboratory efficiency. Pilot evaluations in England and Scotland monitored daily or weekly workloads of smear readers and concluded that LBC could increase hourly throughput rates. This study, instead, used timing surveys to determine screening rates. METHODS: Two National Health Service cytology laboratories in Manchester and Stockport were partially converted to the LBC ThinPrep process for a cervical screening trial. Three 1-week timing surveys were conducted over 7 months. The surveys covered all LBC-trained staff. The first survey in Manchester also covered staff undertaking conventional Pap screening. The smear readers used timers to record time taken for examining and reporting each slide. RESULTS: In Manchester, in the first survey, nearly 1 minute per slide was saved by the LBC method during primary microscopy. In both laboratories, the mean microscopy time for primary screening of LBC slides was reduced by almost 1 minute between the first and second surveys. There was no difference between the second and third surveys. Microscopy by cytopathologists was also 1 minute per slide quicker with LBC than conventional Pap. The LBC inadequate rates for both laboratories were <2.0%. Organizational factors impacted on the hourly LBC primary screening rates in the laboratories, the rate for Stockport being higher than the rates in the pilot evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: The timing surveys confirm that the LBC ThinPrep technology can improve laboratory efficiency. However, decision-makers should also consider the overall costs and benefits of introducing the technology in screening programmes, including the capital investment and workforce implications.     

Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid‐based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high‐grade dyskaryosis?

R. G. Blanks and R. S. Kelly
Comparison of cytology and histology results in English cervical screening laboratories before and after liquid‐based cytology conversion: do the data provide evidence for a single category of high‐grade dyskaryosis? Objective: To determine whether the difference between the positive predictive value (PPV) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) of referral from moderate dyskaryosis and from severe dyskaryosis was reduced after laboratories converted from conventional to liquid‐based cytology (LBC). Furthermore, to explore the cytology/histology agreement after LBC conversion, and to determine post‐LBC whether there was increased support for the use of one single category of high‐grade dyskaryosis (equivalent to high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion). Methods: The association between cytology and histology has been examined using annual Korner return data (KC61 returns) collected by laboratories from the English National Health Service cervical screening programme. The study compares return data before and after LBC conversion. Results: The study examined data from 102 laboratories that converted from conventional cytology to LBC. Before conversion the PPV for CIN2+ of severe dyskaryosis was 88% and after increased to 90% (P = 0.003). For moderate dyskaryosis the PPV for CIN2+ increased from 70% to 72% (P = 0.06). The absolute difference of 18% between severe and moderate dyskaryosis was therefore the same pre‐ and post‐LBC conversion. The PPV of mild dyskaryosis for CIN2+ before and after conversion reduced from 23% to 19% (P < 0.001). The agreement between cytology and histology measured using a weighted Kappa statistic increased from 0.52 to 0.60 after conversion to LBC because of small increases in the proportions of severe dyskaryosis or worse with CIN3+ outcomes and mild dyskaryosis with CIN1 or less outcomes. Conclusions: Following LBC conversion there was evidence of a modest increase in the agreement between cytology and histology but no evidence of a change in the absolute difference in PPV for CIN2+ between moderate and severe dyskaryosis. The data support the conclusion that women referred with moderate dyskaryosis will on average have a lower risk of progression to invasive cancer than women referred with severe dyskaryosis. If the data were considered to support the categories of high‐grade dyskaryosis (moderate) and high‐grade dyskaryosis (severe) before LBC conversion then it can be strongly argued that they also support these categories after conversion.     

Diagnostic value of urine erythrocyte morphology in the detection of glomerular disease in SurePath™ liquid‐based cytology compared with fresh urine sediment examination

H. Ohsaki, T. Hirouchi, N. Hayashi, E. Okanoue, M. Ohara, N. Kuroda, E. Hirakawa and Y. Norimatsu
Diagnostic value of urine erythrocyte morphology in the detection of glomerular disease in SurePath? liquid‐based cytology compared with fresh urine sediment examination Objective: To assess whether the morphology of urine erythrocytes can be an effective tool for distinguishing glomerular disease from lower urinary tract disease in SurePath^? liquid‐based cytology (SP‐LBC). Methods: We examined four morphological parameters of erythrocytes: (1) irregular erythrocytes (of all types including fragmented forms) comprising greater than or equal to 20% of erythrocytes; (2) uniform erythrocytes (>80%); (3) doughnut or target‐like shaped (D/T) erythrocytes (≥1%); and (4) acanthocytes (≥1%) in glomerular disease (n = 32) and lower urinary tract disease (n = 20) with SP‐LBC slides in cases that had also been assessed by fresh urine sediment examination. Results: Sensitivity of D/T erythrocytes and acanthocytes (dysmorphic erythrocytes) for glomerular disease were 100% and 87.5%, respectively, with urine sediment examination, and 81.3% and 46.9%, respectively, in SP‐LBC slides. Specificity was 100% for D/T erythrocytes and acanthocytes using either procedure. While irregular erythrocytes were specific for glomerular disease using urine sediment examination, they were seen in 70% of those with lower urinary tract disease using SP‐LBC slides as a result of the deformation of erythrocytes by the fixative. Conclusions: Although the sensitivity of D/T erythrocytes and acanthocytes for glomerular disease was lower in SP‐LBC slides than fresh urine sediment examination, their specificity was equally high. Therefore, urine erythrocyte morphology is useful in the detection of glomerular disease with the SP‐LBC slides. However, morphological features apart from D/T erythrocytes and acanthocytes are not useful in SP‐LBC slides.     

O‐110 YEAR AUDIT OF GLANDULAR CYTOLOGY REPORTS WITH SPECIAL REGARD TO THE EFFECT OF CONVERSION TO LBC

Objectives: A randomised trial in screening to improve cytology (ARTISTIC Trial) was set up to evaluate the effectiveness of human papilloma virus (HPV) testing in primary cervical screening. Design: Women attending the NHS Cervical Screening Programme in Greater Manchester were screened for HPV in addition to routine cytological testing with ThinPrep Liquid‐Based Cytology (LBC). 25 020 women aged 20–64 were screened at entry and 3 years later. Participants were randomised in a 3 : 1 ratio between those whose HPV test result was revealed and acted upon and those in whom it was concealed. Results: A total of 24 510 women (18 386 revealed and 6124 concealed) had adequate cytology and HPV results. Cytology results at entry were: 87% normal, 11% borderline or mild, 1.1% moderate and 0.6% severe dyskaryosis or worse. Prevalence of HPV decreased sharply with age, from 40% at age 20–24 to 12% at 35–39 and 7% or less above age 50, and increased with cytological grade, from 10% (normal cytology) to 31% (borderline), 70% (mild), 86% (moderate), and 96% (severe or worse). Only 60% of women with severe dyskaryosis showed HPV 16 and / or 18 infection. Conclusion: The ARTISTIC Trial has provided the largest collection of LBC samples with HPV typing in Greater Manchester population. It has shown that the HPV testing is practicable in routine screening in women aged over 30. HPV 16 and 18 are more predictive for underlying disease, but other HPV types account for 30% of high‐grade disease.     

P-9A COMPARISON OF THE REPORTING MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF GLANDULAR NEOPLASIA FOR CONVENTIONAL AND LIQUID BASED CYTOLOGY FOR CERVICAL SAMPLES

Cervical cancer accounts for approximately 15% of cancer diagnosed in women worldwide with up to 190 000 deaths per annum. One of the major causes of cervical cancer is the infection of human papillomavirus (HPV), a DNA virus. This virus is epidermotropic; there are over 75 subtypes and subtypes 16, 18, 31 and 33 are associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and carcinomas. Since the start of the cervical screening in mid 1960s, the cervical cancer rate has decreased. There are two techniques used for slide preparation and staining: conventional cytology and liquid based cytology (LBC). Due to the differences in sample collection and preparation, certain aspects of cell morphology, architecture and patterns will present differently from each other on the slide. The study was conducted in a County Hospital. Twenty conventional slides and eight LBC slides already reported as ? Glandular neoplasia were reviewed and assessed with regards to their morphological features. Moreover, conventional slides were compared with LBC slides to determine the differences in their cell morphology, sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, a semi-quantitative method was used and also true-positive and false-positive rates were evaluated using positive predictive value (PPV). The findings indicated that despite the differences in cell morphology there are many similarities between the two techniques. The study also showed that it was difficult to distinguish between abnormal glandular cells and abnormal squamous cells, which may end in a false positive result and over reporting of glandular neoplasia. Finally, it showed that LBC slides were easier to screen and also had a higher positive predictive value (PPV) resulting in higher sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, the LBC technique is more accurate and conversion to this technique is the positive step in the screening program.     

Assessing the wellbeing of cytoscreeners: experience in two NHS cytology laboratories

OBJECTIVE: Cervical screening programmes in England are in transition as the liquid-based cytology (LBC) method replaces conventional Papanicolaou screening and staff in NHS laboratories are trained to analyse LBC smears. Cytoscreeners and biomedical scientists undertake routine microscopy of slides, but the scientists usually have a wider professional role. Attitudinal surveys were carried out in laboratories where LBC was partially introduced. METHODS: Staff in two cytology laboratories in Greater Manchester were surveyed twice over 6 months. The questionnaire assessed work pressures using scales from the Measures of Work Characteristics instrument, work-related stress using the General Survey version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, job intentions and job satisfaction. RESULTS: Cytoscreeners, many aged over 50 years, formed over 60% of respondents in both surveys (27/42 in the first survey), and biomedical scientists and doctors, 30%. Both groups were under moderate pressure from work demands in each survey, but cytoscreeners had significantly less autonomy over their working methods (P < 0.001). Although both groups experienced similar levels of exhaustion, cytoscreeners were much more cynical or indifferent towards work in the second survey (P = 0.008) and had lower expectations of being effective (P < 0.001). For the cytoscreeners, there were strong negative correlations in both surveys between cynicism and the work characteristics of influencing decisions and autonomy/control. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the relationship between work performance and wellbeing serves to emphasize the importance of the new LBC technology in ameliorating low morale where it exists. Further attitudinal research involving larger samples of laboratories is warranted to assess the full impact of this innovation.     

Comparison of the conventional cervical smear and liquid-based cytology: results of a controlled, prospective study in the Abruzzo Region of Italy

OBJECTIVE: To compare conventional cervical testing (CCT) and liquid-based cytology (LBC) within a randomized trial performed during 2001-2002 in the Abruzzo Region of Italy, including a cost-outcome comparative analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Study subjects were recruited in the framework of a controlled, randomized study organized in the Abruzzo Region. Women aged 2 6-64 years were randomized to an active arm (LBC) or control arm (CC1). The particip ating laboratories had no previous ex perience with LBC. RESULTS: The inadequacy rate was 4.3% in CCT and 1.3% in the LBC arm (D < 0.001). Atypical squamous cells of undetermined sign ifi cance and atypical glands of undetermined significance reports were more frequent at CCT vs. LBC. A small, insignificant excess of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or high grade squamous epithelial lesions+ reports was observed in the LBC arm. The cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN2+) detection rate was not statistically different in the 2 arms (CCT=0.54%, LBC= 0.66%, p = 0.28). In the overall series positive predictive value was slightly but not significantly higher in the LBC arm. LBC increased costs by 4.2% per both screened women and CIN2+ detected. CONCLUSION: The study reflects the introductory phase of LBC in laboratories without prior LBC experience. In this setting LBC reduced the inadequacy rate and decreased reading and was at least as sensitive as and more specific than CCT. Utilization of LBC in organized screening programs will be based on local feasibility, considering that the high cost of LBC is only partially compensated for by other benefits, such as residual cellular material, available for molecular testing, including human papillomavirus testing.     

Image analysis of peripheral compression artefacts of ThinPrep® liquid‐based cytology preparations

J. Choi, H. S. Shim, J.‐W. Song, S. W. Chae, Y.‐N. Lee, J. E. Kim and S. H. Kim
Image analysis of peripheral compression artefacts of ThinPrep^® liquid‐based cytology preparations Objective: ThinPrep (TP), one of the Food and Drug Administration‐approved liquid‐based cytology (LBC) preparations, is widely used for gynaecological and non‐gynaecological cytology samples. A unique physical artefact caused by the compression at the periphery in TP slides has not been adequately evaluated to date. Methods: We processed four established tumour cell lines (MKN28, MKN45, KG‐1 and NB4) and mononuclear cells isolated from whole blood over Ficoll‐Plaque for TP preparations. For this part of the study, we included five normal cervical LBC preparations. We then auto‐counted and auto‐measured the area, mean grey value and Feret’s diameter in both the inner disc and peripheral rim of the preparations by image morphometry. In addition, we compared the distribution of atypical cell groups in the peripheral rim and inner disc of 132 lung aspirates, 80 thyroid aspirates, 212 cerebrospinal fluids (CSFs) and 50 gynaecological samples. Results: The areas and Feret’s diameters of the cytoplasm in the peripheral compressed rim area were statistically larger than those of cells in the inner disc. The mean grey values of cells (cytoplasm and nucleus) in the peripheral compression rim were also smaller than those in the inner disc cells, leading to decreases in nuclear and cytoplasmic chromatism. Except for the mean grey values, the differences were not significant in the cervical samples. Conclusions: Cellular morphology may be markedly distorted in the peripheral rim, regardless of cell malignancy, which may lead to the misinterpretation of cells during the screening. Accordingly, cytological diagnosis based on the findings within the peripheral rim should take this phenomenon into account. Compressed cells found in the peripheral rim should be interpreted with caution when TP slides are used for cytopathological diagnosis.     

Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology

T. Heard, A. Chandra, G. Culora, S.S. Gupta, A. Herbert and M. Morgan
Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology Objective: To audit the use of the ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS) for internal quality control (IQC) in the place of rapid review (RR), and to compare its performance with routine primary screening. Method: During 9 months, 16 462 ThinPrep slides were processed by TIS. Slides were initially reviewed using the TIS review scope, as recommended by the manufacturer: 22 fields of view were observed and, if considered abnormal, a full microscopic review was conducted using the review scope. Different biomedical scientists (BMSs), working on each procedure in rotation, performed batches of TIS‐assisted quality control and routine primary screening independently on unmarked slides. Any slides with abnormalities detected by either method were referred to a consultant pathologist or advanced BMS practitioner for a final report. TIS results were compared with both previous records of RR and routine primary screening carried out on the same slides. We used the UK terminology in which ‘dyskaryosis’ is equivalent to squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) and borderline to atypical (including squamous and glandular cells). Results: TIS preview detected significantly more high‐grade dyskaryosis compared with RR during the previous 4 years: 2.0–4.2 compared with 0.1–1.8 detected per 1000 slides (P = 0.0001). TIS and routine screening were equivalent in sensitivity and specificity for the final cytology result, but BMSs were significantly more likely to classify slides as dyskaryotic rather than borderline when using TIS compared with routine screening. Referrals for potentially high‐grade abnormalities detected by TIS‐assisted IQC alone found 28 biopsies of at least cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2+), whereas 15 CIN2+ biopsies were found on routine screening but missed using TIS. There was no significant change in the rates of inadequate tests, high‐ or low‐grade cytological abnormalities, or positive predictive value for CIN2+ when TIS was in use. Conclusions: Screening with TIS was more sensitive than RR for IQC, providing a rescreening method equivalent to routine primary screening in overall accuracy.     

Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology

A. Evered and N. Dudding Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology Objective: To evaluate virtual microscopy in terms of diagnostic performance and acceptability among practising cytologists. Methods: Twenty‐four experienced cytologists were recruited to examine 20 SurePath® cervical cytology slides by virtual microscopy. Diagnostic accuracy was compared with glass slide microscopy using an unbiased crossover experimental design. Responses were allocated a score of one for a correct identification of normal or abnormal (borderline/atypical changes in squamous or glandular cells or worse) and a score of zero for an incorrect response (a normal slide reported as abnormal or vice versa). Perceptions of virtual microscopy were assessed by questionnaire analysis. Results: Participants yielded a total of 285 responses for the virtual slide set and 300 for the glass slide set. The approximate time to screen a virtual slide was 18 minutes, compared with 8 minutes or less for a glass slide. Overall there was no significant difference between virtual microscopy and glass slide microscopy in terms of diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.22). Virtual microscopy under‐performed when images were captured over a narrow focal range (P = 0.01). Diagnostic accuracy of virtual microscopy equalled that of glass slide microscopy when participants were able to focus through the full thickness of the slide images (P = 0.07). The most common difficulties experienced by participants with virtual microscopy were freezing of the computer screen during image download, slow response of the computer during slide movement and, in some instances, ‘fuzzy’ images. Cytologists have a strong preference for glass slides over virtual microscopy despite the overall equal diagnostic performance of the two viewing modalities. Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy of virtual microscopy can equal that of glass slide microscopy. However, without good computer network connections, wide focal range and software that permits effortless navigation across virtual slides, cytologists are unlikely to be convinced of the utility of this technology for cytology screening and diagnosis.     

P-6SCREENER SENSITIVITY – ALL CHANGE FOR LBC

Introduction:  This poster aims to provide a discussion point for the calculation of screener performance. LBC has brought about changes in the way slides are interpreted, single dispersed isolated dyskaryotic cells take on a new meaning and the process of quality control, rapid review has changed. These changes challenge the rationale behind screener sensitivity calculations especially as many laboratories are in an early learning phase with regard to LBC.
Method:  Screener sensitivities and the PPV of reporting consultants for a period of six months post LBC conversion are compared with those since the introduction of LBC.
Results:  Screener sensitivities have dropped below the 95% threshold for high-grade dyskaryosis.
Discussion:  The change in rapid review or preview from a partial stepped rescreening of a conventional smear to a full rescreening of LBC slides has meant that all missed abnormalities that may not have been visualised in the conventional slide have a greater possibility of detection in the LBC slide. In analysing screener sensitivity a holistic approach that assesses the reasons for missing or misdiagnosing high-grade abnormalities is advised. Over reporting by consultants as indicated by PPV and slide review should be taken into account when there is a suspected poor performer. The recent move to refer all mild dyskaryotic smears for colposcopic assessment and the EQA requirement for screeners to detect dyskaryosis without the necessity for grading suggests that there may be a need to reassess the basis of current screener sensitivity calculations.     

Significance of bizarre cells in cervical screening liquid‐based cytology: A prospective study of 15 cases

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the significance of bizarre cells (cells of squamous origin with a superficial squamous cell‐type cytoplasm and characterised by multinucleation that produces bizarre nuclear shapes) in liquid‐based cytology (LBC) Papanicoaou (pap) smears with clinical and histological follow‐up correlation.

Methods

Fifteen patients, all with LBC samples containing bizarre cells, were identified in routine ThinPrep^® LBC workload. HPV testing was performed in each case using residual LBC material. Cytological‐histological correlations were reviewed.

Results

All 15 LBC samples contained bizarre cells and tested positive for high‐risk HPV types. Ten of the 15 cases were identified as atypical squamous cells ‐ cannot exclude an HSIL (ASC‐H) with secondary diagnosis of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), while five cases were identified as high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), and a subsequent biopsy was recommended. Additionally, 13/15 cases underwent cone biopsy or hysterectomy within 1‐11 months, of which 10 showed histologically confirmed HSIL end‐points. LSIL was present in three cases. Bizarre cells were identified in the HSIL epithelium of five cone biopsies.

Conclusions

Identification of bizarre cells in LBC is straightforward and may facilitate diagnosis. The cytology of bizarre cells is associated with HSIL in cone biopsies. We recommend assigning LBC samples containing bizarre cells as ASC‐H with secondary diagnosis of LSIL.     

Tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology: a feasible tool for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients

K. Yamashiro, K. Taira, M. Nakajima, D. Okuyama, M. Azuma, H. Takeda, H. Suzuki, H. Jotoku, K. Watanabe, M. Takahashi, K. Taguchi and M. Tamura
Tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology: a feasible tool for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients Objectives: A unique diagnostic method was designed for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer patients, and the results were verified with 2 years of experience. Methods: Excised lymph nodes were cut into 2‐mm‐thick slices and rinsed thoroughly in CytoRich Red^®. The sliced tissues were embedded in a paraffin block. Three cytological glass slides of the cells exfoliated in CytoRich Red^® were prepared by the SurePath^® liquid‐based cytology (LBC) technique. Two slides were stained by the Papanicolaou method, and the remaining slide was immunostained with an anti‐keratin antibody. This process is called tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology (TRLBC). The results of TRLBC were compared with those of the final pathological diagnoses, including immunostaining with an anti‐keratin antibody on paraffin blocks (PB). Results: This study analysed 444 SLNs from 247 consecutive breast cancer patients. It required 35 minutes to complete the intraoperative diagnosis on a single node, and it took an additional 5 minutes per node if more than one node was submitted. When the results of PB were assumed to be the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of TRLBC were 81.9% and 96.1%, respectively. TRLBC detected all nodes with macrometastasis and 23 of 24 nodes with micrometastasis. Fifteen false‐negative TRLBC results were ‘isolated tumour cell clusters’ on PB, but there was one with micrometastasis histologically. Four of 14 false‐positive TRLBC results were proven to be true positive by supplementary examination using step sectioning of the paraffin blocks of the nodes. Conclusion: TRLBC is a feasible and promising intraoperative cytopathological tool showing a comparable efficacy to PB while still allowing the conventional postoperative histological examination.     

The British Society For Clinical Cytology Certificate of Competence In Cytology Screening: A Report of the First 3 Years'' Experience

In 1988 the Department of Health (DOH) recognized the cytology screener grade of laboratory staff. Cytology screeners have a 2 year training period after which they must sit a 'competence examination'. The British Society for Clinical Cytology offers an examination to meet the DOH specification. It consists of a written paper, a practical screening test, a spot test and a short viva voce. The screening test is paramount and candidates who miss a dyskaryotic smear cannot be successful. In the first 3 years there have been 22 examinations, 294 candidates and a pass rate of 76%. The majority of candidates were Cytology Screeners of 2-3 years experience but significant numbers of Medical Laboratory Scientific Officers (MLSOs) and senior MLSOs also chose to sit the examination.     

A comparison of variability in Papanicolaou and liquid-based cytology inadequacy rates using Shewhart control charts

OBJECTIVE: To use Shewhart control charts to compare variability in inadequacy rates from Papanicolaou (Pap) and liquid-based cytology (LBC). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of quality assurance data. SETTING: Eleven Welsh cytology laboratories. METHODS: Shewhart 'p' charts were plotted for proportions of slides reported as inadequate. Charts were compared for statistical control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evidence of statistical control in the processes. RESULTS: Control charts allowed easy interpretation of patterns in the data. Variability in inadequacy rates was much lower for LBC than for Pap cytology. CONCLUSION: Monitoring inadequate rates with Shewhart charts provides more information than tabular monitoring reports, assisting in quality improvement. With respect to inadequacy rates, LBC is less variable than Pap cytology.     

Are significant numbers of abnormal cells lost on the discarded ThinPrep® broom when used for cervical cytology?

A. Umana, H. Dunsmore, A. Herbert, A. Jokhan and A. Kubba
Are significant numbers of abnormal cells lost on the discarded ThinPrep® broom when used for cervical cytology? Background: In view of a study with SurePath® showing that cells were lost on the broom if it was discarded, we decided to investigate whether cells were lost on the ThinPrep® (TP) broom, which is discarded according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Aim: To determine whether significant amounts of cellular material are lost on the discarded TP broom, and whether the loss is operator dependent. Methods: Three hundred and six women attending the Guy’s Hospital Colposcopy Unit gave their consent for TP liquid‐based cytology samples to be taken and the broom immersed in a second vial instead of being discarded. The cellularity of the first and second vials was compared by counting cells in 10 ×40 high‐power fields (HPFs). The significance of cell loss was ascertained by correlating the likelihood of abnormal cells and transformation zone (TZ) material being present with the degree of cellularity of the two vials. Results: More than 10 cells per HPF were seen in 3.2%, 19.4% and 35.8% of slides from the second vial taken by three experienced colposcopists, which was significantly different between them (P < 0.001); cellularity of the first vial was not significantly different between colposcopists but the one with highest cellularity in the first vial discarded most in the second. Abnormal cells were more likely to be seen in slides with more than 10 cells per HPF (P < 0.001) and with evidence of TZ sampling (P < 0.001), but there was no preferential loss of TZ material in the second vial. Of 126 slides with abnormal cells on the slides from the second vial, 113 (89.7%) were also present on the significantly more cellular first vial (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Abnormal cells were potentially lost on the broom, but were usually represented in the first vial. The likelihood of abnormal cells being discarded was operator dependent in this small study, but this did not affect the quality of the initial preparation. The likelihood of abnormal cells being seen on TP slides was dependent on their cellularity, which provided our laboratory with a criterion for the assessment of sample adequacy.     

Factors contributing to false‐negative and potential false‐negative cytology reports in SurePath™ liquid‐based cervical cytology

N. Gupta, D. John, N. Dudding, J. Crossley and J. H. F. Smith
Factors contributing to false‐negative and potential false‐negative cytology reports in SurePath ? liquid‐based cervical cytology Objectives: The characteristics of false‐negative conventional cervical cytology smears have been well documented, but there is limited literature available for liquid‐based cytology (LBC), especially SurePath? samples. We aimed to assess the characteristics of false‐negative SurePath LBC samples. Methods: Over a period of 5 years, an audit of false‐negative reports in SurePath cervical cytology was undertaken. In a workload of 183, 112 samples, 481 (0.3%) false negatives were identified using two routes: those detected by routine laboratory internal quality control (rapid pre‐screening) (n = 463) and those reported as normal (true false negatives) with concurrent high‐grade cervical histology (n = 18). Ninety‐five false‐negative cases with a subsequent biopsy reported as at least cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2+) were reviewed for a number of different cytomorphological features. Results: Of 95 samples with subsequent CIN2+, 30.5% predominately contained microbiopsies/hyperchromatic crowded cell groups (HCGs), 27.3% sparse dyskarytotic cells, 4.2% pale cell dyskaryosis, 6.3% small dyskaryotic cells; 3.2% were misinterpreted cells, 8.4% contained other distracting cells, 7.4% were low contrast, 5.3% were unexplained and 7.4% were true negatives. The mean number of microbiopsies/HCGs in that category was 4.6. The mean number of abnormal cells in the sparse dyskaryotic cell category was 13.8. Conclusions: Microbiopsies/HCGs were the commonest reason for false negatives. They were usually present in sufficient numbers to be detected but interpretation could be problematic. Dispersed single abnormal cells were usually not identified because of their scarcity or the presence of distracters.