Turnip crinkle virus-encoded suppressor of RNA silencing interacts with Arabidopsis SGS3 to enhance virus infection

Most plant viruses encode suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs) to protect themselves from antiviral RNA silencing in host plants. The capsid protein (CP) of Turnip crinkle virus (TCV) is a well-characterized VSR, whereas SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3) is an important plant-encoded component of the RNA silencing pathways. Whether the VSR activity of TCV CP requires it to engage SGS3 in plant cells has yet to be investigated. Here, we report that TCV CP interacts with SGS3 of Arabidopsis in both yeast and plant cells. The interaction was identified with the yeast two-hybrid system, and corroborated with bimolecular fluorescence complementation and intracellular co-localization assays in Nicotiana benthamiana cells. While multiple partial TCV CP fragments could independently interact with SGS3, its hinge domain connecting the surface and protruding domains appears to be essential for this interaction. Conversely, SGS3 enlists its N-terminal domain and the XS rice gene X and SGS3 (XS) domain as the primary CP-interacting sites. Interestingly, SGS3 appears to stimulate TCV accumulation because viral RNA levels of a TCV mutant with low VSR activities decreased in the sgs3 knockout mutants, but increased in the SGS3-overexpressing transgenic plants. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing TCV CP exhibited developmental abnormalities that resembled sgs3 knockout mutants and caused similar defects in the biogenesis of trans-acting small interfering RNAs. Our data suggest that TCV CP interacts with multiple RNA silencing pathway components that include SGS3, as well as previously reported DRB4 (dsRNA-binding protein 4) and AGO2 (ARGONAUTE protein 2), to achieve efficient suppression of RNA silencing-mediated antiviral defence.     

Turnip crinkle virus‐encoded suppressor of RNA silencing interacts with Arabidopsis SGS3 to enhance virus infection

Most plant viruses encode suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs) to protect themselves from antiviral RNA silencing in host plants. The capsid protein (CP) of Turnip crinkle virus (TCV) is a well‐characterized VSR, whereas SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3) is an important plant‐encoded component of the RNA silencing pathways. Whether the VSR activity of TCV CP requires it to engage SGS3 in plant cells has yet to be investigated. Here, we report that TCV CP interacts with SGS3 of Arabidopsis in both yeast and plant cells. The interaction was identified with the yeast two‐hybrid system, and corroborated with bimolecular fluorescence complementation and intracellular co‐localization assays in Nicotiana benthamiana cells. While multiple partial TCV CP fragments could independently interact with SGS3, its hinge domain connecting the surface and protruding domains appears to be essential for this interaction. Conversely, SGS3 enlists its N‐terminal domain and the XS rice gene X and SGS3 (XS) domain as the primary CP‐interacting sites. Interestingly, SGS3 appears to stimulate TCV accumulation because viral RNA levels of a TCV mutant with low VSR activities decreased in the sgs3 knockout mutants, but increased in the SGS3‐overexpressing transgenic plants. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing TCV CP exhibited developmental abnormalities that resembled sgs3 knockout mutants and caused similar defects in the biogenesis of trans‐acting small interfering RNAs. Our data suggest that TCV CP interacts with multiple RNA silencing pathway components that include SGS3, as well as previously reported DRB4 (dsRNA‐binding protein 4) and AGO2 (ARGONAUTE protein 2), to achieve efficient suppression of RNA silencing‐mediated antiviral defence.     

RNA沉默与植物病毒

植物中RNA沉默（RNAsilencing)亦称为转录后基因沉默（PTGS）或共抑制,是植物抵抗外来核酸（转座子、转基因或病毒）入侵,并保护自身基因组完整性的一种防御机制。RNA沉默是近十年来发现的植物界中普遍存在的现象,已成为植物分子生物学领域的一个新的研究方向。对RNA沉默特点和机制的研究表明,植物病毒与（转基因）植物内发生的RNA沉默有着密切的联系,作者从病毒对RNA沉默的诱导、抑制、防御等方面,简述了RNA沉默与病毒的关系。并对病毒载体所诱导的RNA沉默在植物发育和基因组功能分析等方面的应用价值进行了讨论。     

Truncation of a P1 leader proteinase facilitates potyvirus replication in a non‐permissive host

The Potyviridae family is a major group of plant viruses that includes c. 200 species, most of which have narrow host ranges. The potyvirid P1 leader proteinase self‐cleaves from the remainder of the viral polyprotein and shows large sequence variability linked to host adaptation. P1 proteins can be classified as Type A or Type B on the basis, amongst other things, of their dependence or not on a host factor to develop their protease activity. In this work, we studied Type A proteases from the Potyviridae family, characterizing their host factor requirements. Our in vitro cleavage analyses of potyvirid P1 proteases showed that the N‐terminal domain is relevant for host factor interaction and suggested that the C‐terminal domain is also involved. In the absence of plant factors, the N‐terminal end of Plum pox virus P1 antagonizes protease self‐processing. We performed extended deletion mutagenesis analysis to define the N‐terminal antagonistic domain of P1. In viral infections, removal of the P1 protease antagonistic domain led to a gain‐of‐function phenotype, strongly increasing local infection in a non‐permissive host. Altogether, our results shed new insights into the adaptation and evolution of potyvirids.     

Mutational analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana ABCE2 identifies important motifs for its RNA silencing suppressor function

• ATP‐binding cassette sub‐family E member 1 (ABCE1) is recognized as a strongly conserved ribosome recycling factor, indispensable for translation in archaea and eukaryotes, however, its role in plants remains largely unidentified. Arabidopsis thaliana encodes two paralogous ABCE proteins (AtABCE1 and AtABCE2), sharing 81% identity. We previously reported that AtABCE2 functions as a suppressor of RNA silencing and that its gene is ubiquitously expressed. Here we describe the structural requirements of AtABCE2 for its suppressor function.
• Using agroinfiltration assays, we transiently overexpressed mutated versions of AtABCE2 together with GFP, to induce silencing in GFP transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. The influence of mutations was analysed at both local and systemic levels by in vivo imaging of GFP, Northern blot analysis of GFP siRNAs and observation of plants under UV light.
• Mutants of AtABCE2 with impaired ATP binding in either active site I or II failed to suppress GFP RNA silencing. Mutations disrupting ATP hydrolysis influenced the suppression of silencing differently at active site I or II. We also found that the N‐terminal iron–sulphur cluster domain of AtABCE2 is crucial for its suppressor function.
• Meaningfully, the observed structural requirements of AtABCE2 for RNA silencing suppression were found to be similar to those of archaeal ABCE1 needed for ribosome recycling. AtABCE2 might therefore suppress RNA silencing via supporting the competing RNA degradation mechanisms associated with ribosome recycling.

     

Nuclear import of CaMV P6 is required for infection and suppression of the RNA silencing factor DRB4

Replication of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), a plant double-stranded DNA virus, requires the viral translational transactivator protein P6. Although P6 is known to form cytoplasmic inclusion bodies (viroplasms) so far considered essential for virus biology, a fraction of the protein is also present in the nucleus. Here, we report that monomeric P6 is imported into the nucleus through two importin-alpha-dependent nuclear localization signals, and show that this process is mandatory for CaMV infectivity and is independent of translational transactivation and viroplasm formation. One nuclear function of P6 is to suppress RNA silencing, a gene regulation mechanism with antiviral roles, commonly counteracted by dedicated viral suppressor proteins (viral silencing suppressors; VSRs). Transgenic P6 expression in Arabidopsis is genetically equivalent to inactivating the nuclear protein DRB4 that facilitates the activity of the major plant antiviral silencing factor DCL4. We further show that a fraction of P6 immunoprecipitates with DRB4 in CaMV-infected cells. This study identifies both genetic and physical interactions between a VSR to a host RNA silencing component, and highlights the importance of subcellular compartmentalization in VSR function.     

RNA binding is more critical to the suppression of silencing function of Cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein than nuclear localization

Previously, we found that silencing suppression by the 2b protein and six mutants correlated both with their ability to bind to double-stranded (ds) small RNAs (sRNAs) in vitro and with their nuclear/nucleolar localization. To further discern the contribution to suppression activity of sRNA binding and of nuclear localization, we have characterized the kinetics of in vitro binding to a ds sRNA, a single-stranded (ss) sRNA, and a micro RNA (miRNA) of the native 2b protein and eight mutant variants. We have also added a nuclear export signal (NES) to the 2b protein and assessed how it affected subcellular distribution and suppressor activity. We found that in solution native protein bound ds siRNA, miRNA, and ss sRNA with high affinity, at protein:RNA molar ratios ~2:1. Of the four mutants that retained suppressor activity, three showed sRNA binding profiles similar to those of the native protein, whereas the remaining one bound ss sRNA at a 2:1 molar ratio, but both ds sRNAs with 1.5-2 times slightly lower affinity. Three of the four mutants lacking suppressor activity failed to bind to any sRNA, whereas the remaining one bound them at far higher ratios. NES-tagged 2b protein became cytoplasmic, but suppression activity in patch assays remained unaffected. These results support binding to sRNAs at molar ratios at or near 2:1 as critical to the suppressor activity of the 2b protein. They also show that cytoplasmically localized 2b protein retained suppressor activity, and that a sustained nuclear localization was not required for this function.     

dsRNA with 5′ overhangs contributes to endogenous and antiviral RNA silencing pathways in plants

In plants, SGS3 and RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6) are required to convert single‐ to double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the innate RNAi‐based antiviral response and to produce both exogenous and endogenous short‐interfering RNAs. Although a role for RDR6‐catalysed RNA‐dependent RNA polymerisation in these processes seems clear, the function of SGS3 is unknown. Here, we show that SGS3 is a dsRNA‐binding protein with unexpected substrate selectivity favouring 5′‐overhang‐containing dsRNA. The conserved XS and coiled‐coil domains are responsible for RNA‐binding activity. Furthermore, we find that the V2 protein from tomato yellow leaf curl virus, which suppresses the RNAi‐based host immune response, is a dsRNA‐binding protein with similar specificity to SGS3. In competition‐binding experiments, V2 outcompetes SGS3 for substrate dsRNA recognition, whereas a V2 point mutant lacking the suppressor function in vivo cannot efficiently overcome SGS3 binding. These findings suggest that SGS3 recognition of dsRNA containing a 5′ overhang is required for subsequent steps in RNA‐mediated gene silencing in plants, and that V2 functions as a viral suppressor by preventing SGS3 from accessing substrate RNAs.     

Size-independent and noncooperative recognition of dsRNA by the Rice stripe virus RNA silencing suppressor NS3

Plant and animal viruses employ diverse suppressor proteins to thwart the host antiviral reaction of RNA silencing. Many suppressors bind dsRNA with different size specificity. Here, we examine the dsRNA recognition mechanism of the Rice stripe virus NS3 suppressor using quantitative biochemical approaches, as well as mutagenesis and suppression activity analyses in plants. We show that dimeric NS3 is a size-independent, rather than small interfering RNA-specific, dsRNA-binding protein that recognizes a minimum of 9 bp and can bind to long dsRNA with two or more copies. Global analysis using a combinatorial approach reveals that NS3 dimer has an occluded site size of ∼ 13 bp on dsRNA, an intrinsic binding constant of 1 × 10⁸ M^− 1, and virtually no binding cooperativity. This lack of cooperativity suggests that NS3 is not geared to target long dsRNA. The larger site size of NS3, compared with its interacting size, indicates that the NS3 structure has a border region that has no direct contact with dsRNA but occludes a ∼ 4-bp region from binding. We also develop a method to correct the border effect of ligand by extending the lattice length. In addition, we find that NS3 recognizes the helical structure and 2′-hydroxyl group of dsRNA with moderate specificity. Analysis of dsRNA-binding mutants suggests that silencing of the suppression activity of NS3 is mechanistically related to its dsRNA binding ability.     

Two amino acids near the N‐terminus of Cucumber mosaic virus 2b play critical roles in the suppression of RNA silencing and viral infectivity

Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) 2b suppresses RNA silencing primarily through the binding of double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) of varying sizes. However, the biologically active form of 2b remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the single and double alanine substitution mutants in the N‐terminal 15th leucine and 18th methionine of CMV 2b exhibit drastically attenuated virulence in wild‐type plants, but are efficiently rescued in mutant plants defective in RNA‐dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6) and Dicer‐like 4 (DCL4). Moreover, the transgenic plants of 2b, but not 2blm (L15A/M18A), rescue the high infectivity of CMV‐Δ2b through the suppression of antiviral silencing. L15A, M18A or both weaken 2b suppressor activity on local and systemic transgene silencing. In contrast with the high affinity of 2b to short and long dsRNAs, 2blm is significantly compromised in 21‐bp duplex small interfering RNA (siRNA) binding ability, but maintains a strong affinity for long dsRNAs. In cross‐linking assays, 2b can form dimers, tetramers and oligomers after treatment with glutaraldehyde, whereas 2blm only forms dimers, rather than tetramers and oligomers, in vitro. Together, these findings suggest that L15 and M18 of CMV 2b are required for high affinity to ds‐siRNAs and oligomerization activity, which are essential for the suppression activity of 2b on antiviral silencing.     

Escape of a plant virus from amplicon-mediated RNA silencing is associated with biotic or abiotic stress

Strong RNA silencing was induced in plants transformed with an amplicon consisting of full-length cDNA of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP), as shown by low levels of PLRV-GFP accumulation, lack of symptoms and accumulation of amplicon-specific short interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Inoculation of these plants with various viruses known to encode silencing suppressor proteins induced a striking synergistic effect leading to the enhanced accumulation of PLRV-GFP, suggesting that it had escaped from silencing. However, PLRV-GFP escape also occurred following inoculation with viruses that do not encode known silencing suppressors and treatment of silenced plants with biotic or abiotic stress agents. We propose that viruses can evade host RNA-silencing defences by a previously unrecognized mechanism that may be associated with a host response to some types of abiotic stress such as heat shock.     

Signatures of selection and host‐adapted gene expression of the Phytophthora infestans RNA silencing suppressor PSR2

Phytophthora infestans is a devastating pathogen in agricultural systems. Recently, an RNA silencing suppressor (PSR2, ‘Phytophthora suppressor of RNA silencing 2’) has been described in P. infestans. PSR2 has been shown to increase the virulence of Phytophthora pathogens on their hosts. This gene is one of the few effectors present in many economically important Phytophthora species. In this study, we investigated: (i) the evolutionary history of PSR2 within and between species of Phytophthora; and (ii) the interaction between sequence variation, gene expression and virulence. In P. infestans, the highest PiPSR2 expression was correlated with decreased symptom expression. The highest gene expression was observed in the biotrophic phase of the pathogen, suggesting that PSR2 is important during early infection. Protein sequence conservation was negatively correlated with host range, suggesting host range as a driver of PSR2 evolution. Within species, we detected elevated amino acid variation, as observed for other effectors; however, the frequency spectrum of the mutations was inconsistent with strong balancing selection. This evolutionary pattern may be related to the conservation of the host target(s) of PSR2 and the absence of known corresponding R genes. In summary, our study indicates that PSR2 is a conserved effector that acts as a master switch to modify plant gene regulation early during infection for the pathogen's benefit. The conservation of PSR2 and its important role in virulence make it a promising target for pathogen management.     

Respective contributions of Arabidopsis DCL2 and DCL4 to RNA silencing

Dicer proteins are central to the different mechanisms involving RNA interference. Plants have evolved multiple DICER‐LIKE (DCL) copies, thus enabling functional diversification. In Arabidopsis, DCL2 and DCL4 process double‐stranded RNA into 22 and 21 nucleotide small interfering (si)RNAs, respectively, and have overlapping functions with regards to virus and transgene silencing. Nonetheless, some studies have reported that dcl2 or dcl4 single mutations are sometimes sufficient to hinder silencing. To better dissect the role of DCL2 and DCL4, we analyzed silencing kinetics and efficiencies using different transgenic systems in single and double mutant backgrounds. The results indicate that DCL2 stimulates transitivity and secondary siRNA production through DCL4 while being sufficient for silencing on its own. Notably, silencing of 35S‐driven transgenes functions more efficiently in dcl4 mutants, indicating that DCL4 mostly obscures DCL2 in wild‐type plants. Nonetheless, in a dcl4 mutant compromised in phloem‐originating silencing, ectopically expressed DCL2 allows restoration of silencing, suggesting that DCL2 is not, or poorly, expressed in phloem. Remarkably, this ectopic DCL2 contribution to phloem‐originating silencing is dependent on the activity of RNA‐DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE6. These results indicate that, despite differences in the silencing activity of their small RNA products, DCL2 and DCL4 mostly act redundantly yet hierarchically when present simultaneously.     

Leek Yellow Stripe Virus Can Adjust for Host Adaptation by Trimming the N-Terminal Domain to Allow the P1 Protein to Function as an RNA Silencing Suppressor

In Japan, the P1 protein (S-type) encoded by leek yellow stripe virus (LYSV) isolates detected in Honshu and southward is shorter than the P1 (N-type) of LYSV isolates from garlic grown in Hokkaido due to a large deletion in the N-terminal half. In garlic fields in Hokkaido, two types of LYSV isolate with N- and S-type P1s are sometimes found in mixed infections. In this study, we confirmed that N- and S-type P1 sequences were present in the same plant and that they belong to different evolutionary phylogenetic groups. To investigate how LYSV with S-type P1 (LYSV-S) could have invaded LYSV with N-type P1 (LYSV-N)-infected garlic, we examined wild Allium spp. plants in Hokkaido and found that LYSV was almost undetectable. On the other hand, in Honshu, LYSV-S was detected at a high frequency in Allium spp. other than garlic, suggesting that the LYSV-S can infect a wider host range of Allium spp. compared to LYSV-N. Because P1 proteins of potyviruses have been reported to promote RNA silencing suppressor (RSS) activity of HC-Pro proteins, we analyzed whether the same was true for P1 of LYSV. In onion, contrary to expectation, the P1 protein itself had RSS activity. Moreover, the RSS activity of S-type P1 was considerably stronger than that of N-type P1, suggesting that LYSV P1 may be able to enhance its RSS activity when the deletion is in the N-terminal half and that acquiring S-type P1 may have enabled LYSV to expand its host range.     

Human initiation factor eIF3 subunit b interacts with HCV IRES RNA through its N-terminal RNA recognition motif

Many viral mRNAs contain a 5′-UTR RNA element called internal ribosome-entry site (IRES), which bypasses the requirement of some canonical initiation factors allowing cap-independent translation. The IRES of hepatitis-C virus drives translation by directly recruiting 40S ribosomal subunits and binds to eIF3 which plays a critical role in both cap-dependent and cap-independent translation. However, the molecular basis for eIF3 activity in either case remains enigmatic. Here we report that subunit b of the eIF3 complex directly binds to HCV IRES domain III via its N-terminal-RRM. Because eIF3b was previously shown to be involved in eIF3j binding, biological implications are discussed.     

Transgenically expressed viral RNA silencing suppressors interfere with microRNA methylation in Arabidopsis

HEN1-dependent methylation of the 3'-terminal nucleotide is a crucial step in plant microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis. Here we report that several viral RNA silencing suppressors (P1/HC-Pro, p21 and p19) inhibit miRNA methylation. These suppressors have distinct effects on different miRNAs. We also show that miRNA* is methylated in vivo in a suppressor-sensitive manner, suggesting that the viral proteins interfere with miRNA/miRNA* duplexes. p19 and p21 bind both methylated and unmethylated miRNA/miRNA* duplexes in vivo. These findings suggest miRNA/miRNA* as the in vivo substrates for the HEN1 miRNA methyltransferase and raise intriguing possibilities regarding the cellular location of miRNA methylation.