Behavioral recovery after irreversible inactivation of D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors

Irreversible inactivation of both D-1 and D-2 dopamine (DA) receptors by N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) resulted in complete loss of stereotypy response to R-(-)-N-propylnorapomorphine (NPA; 0.1-1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) 24 hr later. Stereotyped sniffing recovered much more rapidly than oral behaviors. The D-2 antagonist sulpiride (200 mg/kg) and the putatively nonselective antagonist cis-flupenthixol (2 mg/kg), administered prior to EEDQ, prevented the loss of NPA-induced sniffing but only partially protected against loss of oral behaviors 24 hr later. Complete protection of both behaviors was seen after pretreatment with a combination of sulpiride and the selective D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 (1 mg/kg); pretreatment with the selective D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 alone, however, did not modify the rate of recovery of either behavioral response. The results suggest that either different populations of DA receptors mediate expression of these behaviors or stimulation of a small fraction of the total DA receptor pool may be sufficient to elicit sniffing but not oral responses. Furthermore, maintaining a normal complement of D-2 rather than D-1 receptors appears to be a critical determinant for the elicitation of these behaviors.     

Hyperactivity induced by stimulation of separate dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptors in rats with bilateral 6-OHDA lesions

The effects of DA agonists and antagonists with different dopamine (DA) D-1 and D-2 receptor selectivity have been studied in rats with bilateral 6-OHDA lesions. The D-1 agonist SK & F 38393, the D-2 agonist pergolide and the mixed agonist apomorphine all induced marked hyperactivity in lesioned rats in doses which were without stimulant effect in sham-operated animals. The hyperactivity induced by SK & F 38393 was blocked by the DA D-1 antagonist SCH 23390, but unaffected by the D-2 antagonists spiroperidol or clebopride. Pergolide-induced hyperactivity showed the reverse selectivity. The mixed D-1/D-2 antagonists, cis(Z)-flupentixol and cis(Z)-clopenthixol, however blocked the effect of both agonists. Apomorphine-induced hyperactivity was neither blocked by selective D-1 nor D-2 antagonists, but was dose-dependently inhibited by cis(Z)-flupentixol and cis(Z)-clopenthixol. Potent blockade was also obtained by combined treatment with SCH 23390 and spiroperidol, indicating the need of blocking both D-1 and D-2 receptors simultaneously. The results indicate that D-1 and D-2 receptor function can be independently manipulated in denervated rats and they confirm similar results obtained in rats with unilateral 6-OHDA lesions using circling behaviour.     

Behavioral and radioligand binding evidence for irreversible dopamine receptor blockade by N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline

N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ), an irreversible alpha adrenergic antagonist, also acts as a potent and longlasting in vivo antagonist of D-2 dopamine receptors. Rats given EEDQ 3-10 mg/kg i.p. exhibit catalepsy and greatly reduced apomorphine-induced stereotypy, behavioral effects associated with D-2 dopamine receptor blockade. These effects are apparent up to 4 days after drug administration, with scores returning to control level by day 7. In vitro receptor binding assays of striatal membrane preparations from these animals using the radioligand 3H-spiroperidol directly demonstrate that EEDQ is a potent D-2 dopamine receptor antagonist, revealing the apparent basis of the behavioral effects of EEDQ. This antagonism proceeds via a reduction in D-2 receptor Bmax, with no change in the observed KD for 3H-spiroperidol, and is resistant to extensive washing of the membrane preparation after in vivo EEDQ exposure. These observations suggest that EEDQ inhibition of D-2 receptors is irreversible. Administration of behaviorally active doses of EEDQ effect a reduction of 50-85% in D-2 receptor number. Recovery of this loss roughly parallels recovery of normal catalepsy and apomorphine stereotypy scores. These doses of EEDQ also reduce binding of 3H-flupentixol to D-1 and 3H-dopamine to D-3 type dopaminergic binding sites, putative dopamine receptors with no known behavioral correlates. Recovery of D-1 and D-3 binding also occurs with a similar timecourse. Because of the apparent covalent nature of its interaction with dopamine receptors and because of its activity after peripheral administration, EEDQ may prove useful in the study of the function and turnover of dopamine receptors.     

Two dopamine receptors: biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology

In 1979, two categories of dopamine (DA) receptors (designated as D-1 and D-2) were identified on the basis of the ability of a limited number of agonists and antagonists to discriminate between these two entities. In the past 5 years agonists and antagonists selective for each category of receptor have been identified. Using these selective drugs it has been possible to attribute the effects of DA upon physiological and biochemical processes to the stimulation of either a D-1 or a D-2 receptor. Thus, DA-induced enhancement of both hormone release from bovine parathyroid gland and firing of neurosecretory cells in the CNS of Lymnaea stagnalis has been attributed to stimulation of a D-1 receptor. Likewise, the DA-induced inhibition of the release of prolactin and alpha-MSH from the pituitary gland, as well as of acetylcholine, DA and beta-endorphin from brain, the DA-induced inhibition of chemo-sensory discharge in rabbit carotid body and the DA-induced hyperpolarization of neurosecretory cells in the CNS of Lymnaea stagnalis have been attributed to stimulation of a D-2 receptor. Independently two categories of DA receptors (designated as DA-1 and DA-2) were identified in the cardiovascular system. Stimulation of a DA-1 receptor increases the vascular cyclic AMP content and causes a relaxation of vascular smooth muscle in renal blood vessels, whereas stimulation of a DA-2 receptor inhibits the release of norepinephrine from certain postganglionic sympathetic neurons. Recent studies with the newly developed drugs discriminating between D-1 and D-2 receptors suggest however that the independently developed schemata for classification of dopamine receptors in either the central nervous and endocrine systems or the cardiovascular system are similar although maybe not completely identical.     

Interactions of novel dopaminergic ligands with D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors

The interactions of three novel dopaminergic ligands, SKF38393, SKF82526 and SKF83742, with D-1 and D-2 dopamine (DA) receptors have been investigated using radioligand binding techniques and computer modeling procedures. Using the bovine anterior pituitary D-2 DA receptor system, SKF38393 and SKF82526 behave as agonists demonstrating biphasic agonist/3H-antagonist competition curves. For both drugs, the high affinity phase comprised 30% of the total displacement curve. Such findings are atypical as previously tested classical dopamine agonists demonstrated high and low affinity displacement phases in equal proportions. Such behavior exhibited by the SKF agonists may be related to their activity as partial agonists. In contrast, SKF83742 behaves as an antagonist exhibiting homogeneous monophasic competition curves. Similar results are obtained in the rat striatal membrane D-2 DA receptor system. Both SKF38393 and SKF82526 also demonstrate shallow biphasic displacement curves on rat striatal D-1 receptors labeled with 3H-flupentixol whereas SKF83742/3H-flupentixol curves are uniphasic. Of all the ligands, only SKF38393 clearly demonstrates higher affinity for 3H-flupentixol labeled D-1 receptors.     

Modulation of In Vivo Dopamine Release by D2 but Not D1 Receptor Agonists and Antagonists

The capacity of D1 and D2 agonists and antagonists to regulate the in vivo release and metabolism of dopamine (DA) in mesolimbic and nigrostriatal DA neurons of the mouse was determined using gas chromatographic and mass fragmentographic (GC-MF) analysis. DA release was inferred from levels of 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) and DA metabolism was inferred from levels of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA). DA release was increased by the D2 antagonists haloperidol and metoclopramide but not by the D1 antagonists SCH 23390 and SKF 83566. DA metabolism was increased by each of the four antagonists but to a greater extent with the D2 antagonists. The D2 agonists CGS 15855A and LY 171555 decreased DA release whereas the D1 agonist SKF 38393, at relatively high doses, only slightly affected DA release. Each of the three agonists decreased DA metabolism but again metabolism was more affected by the D2-selective drugs. The in vivo release of DA from mesolimbic and neostriatal DA neurons appears to be modulated by D2 but not by D1 receptors, whereas both receptor types can modulate DA metabolism.     

Chemical modification of A1 adenosine receptors in rat brain membranes. Evidence for histidine in different domains of the ligand binding site

Chemical modification of amino acid residues was used to probe the ligand recognition site of A1 adenosine receptors from rat brain membranes. The effect of treatment with group-specific reagents on agonist and antagonist radioligand binding was investigated. The histidine-specific reagent diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP) induced a loss of binding of the agonist R-N6-[3H] phenylisopropyladenosine ([3H]PIA), which could be prevented in part by agonists, but not by antagonists. DEP treatment induced also a loss of binding of the antagonist [3H]8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX). Antagonists protected A1 receptors from this inactivation while agonists did not. This result provided evidence for the existence of at least 2 different histidine residues involved in ligand binding. Consistent with a modification of the binding site, DEP did not alter the affinity of [3H]DPCPX, but reduced receptor number. From the selective protection of [3H] PIA and [3H]DPCPX binding from inactivation, it is concluded that agonists and antagonists occupy different domains at the binding site. Sulfhydryl modifying reagents did not influence antagonist binding, but inhibited agonist binding. This effect is explained by modification of the inhibitory guanine nucleotide binding protein. Pyridoxal 5-phosphate inactivated both [3H]PIA and [3H]DPCPX binding, but the receptors could not be protected from inactivation by ligands. Therefore, no amino group seems to be located at the ligand binding site. In addition, it was shown that no further amino acids with polar side chains are present. The absence of hydrophilic amino acids from the recognition site of the receptor apart from histidine suggests an explanation for the lack of hydrophilic ligands with high affinity for A1 receptors.     

Sulfhydryl group(s) in the ligand binding site of the D-1 dopamine receptor: specific protection by agonist and antagonist

An iodinated compound, [125I]-8-iodo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin -7-ol, has been recently reported [Sidhu, A., & Kebabian, J.W. (1985) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 113, 437-440] to be a specific ligand for the D-1 dopamine receptor. Due to its high affinity and specific activity, this ligand was chosen for the biochemical characterization of the D-1 receptor. Alkylation of particulate fractions of rat caudate nucleus by N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) caused an inactivation of the D-1 receptor, as measured by diminished binding of the radioligand to the receptor. The inactivation of the receptor sites by NEM was rapid and irreversible, resulting in a 70% net loss of binding sites. On the basis of Scatchard analysis of binding to NEM-treated tissue, the loss in binding sites was due to a net decrease in the receptor number with a 2-fold decrease in the affinity of the receptor for the radioligand. Receptor occupancy by either a D-1 specific agonist or antagonist protected the ligand binding sites from NEM-mediated inactivation. NEM treatment of the receptor in the absence or presence of protective compound abolished the agonist high-affinity state of the receptor as well as membrane adenylate cyclase activity. The above-treated striatal membranes were fused with HeLa membranes and assayed for dopamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. When the sources of D-1 receptors were from agonist-protected membranes, the receptors retained their ability to functionally couple to the HeLa adenylate cyclase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Adenylate cyclase from sea urchin eggs is positively and negatively regulated by D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors

The adenylate cyclase present in membranes prepared from sea urchin eggs is sensitive to dopamine stimulation. The receptor sites coupled to sea urchin adenylate cyclase were characterized by means of specific agonists and antagonists. The D-1 dopamine agonist SKF-38393 was able to stimulate enzyme activity, while the two D-1 dopamine antagonists, SCH-23390 and SKF-83566, suppressed the stimulatory effect of dopamine. In addition, the D-2 dopamine agonists, PPHT and metergoline, brought about a dose-dependent inhibition of dopamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. These data show that: (i) in sea urchin eggs adenylate cyclase is regulated by dopamine receptors; (ii) these receptors share characteristics with D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptors present in the mammalian brain.     

Solubilization of the D-1 dopamine receptor from rat striatum

The D-1 dopamine receptor was extracted from rat striatal membranes with 0.7% sodium cholate and 1 M NaCl. Pretreatment of the membranes with a D-1 specific agonist, inclusion of crude phospholipids in the solubilization buffer, and subsequent removal of the detergent led to a maximal extraction of 48% of the receptor binding sites. The D-1 antagonist, [125I]SCH 23982, bound to single class of sites with a Kd of 1.8 nM and a Bmax of 1.65 pmol/mg protein. The solubilized receptors retained the ability to discriminate between active and inactive enantiomers of agonists and antagonists selective for the D-1 receptor.     

Solubilization and reconstitution of the D-1 dopamine receptor: potentiation of the agonist high-affinity state of the receptor

The D-1 dopamine receptor was extracted from rat striatal membranes with sodium cholate and NaCl in the presence of a specific agonist and phospholipids. The soluble receptor then was reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles by further addition of phospholipids prior to detergent removal. Of the total membrane receptors, up to 48% were extracted and 36% were reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. Yields were greatly reduced if the agonist was omitted or replaced with an antagonist. The solubilized and reconstituted D-1 receptors retained the pharmacological properties of the membrane-bound receptors, including the ability to discriminate between active and inactive enantiomers of specific agonists and antagonists. In this regard, the affinity of the reconstituted receptors for the D-1 specific antagonist 125I SCH 23982 was similar to that of the membrane-bound receptors with a Kd of 1.5 nM. Both the soluble and reconstituted forms of the D-1 receptor exhibited two affinity states for the D-1 specific agonist SK&F R-38393. In contrast to the low proportion of the receptors that had a high affinity for the agonists in striatal membranes (less than 6%), there was a dramatic increase following solubilization (22%) and reconstitution (40%). Similar results were obtained by using dopamine; the proportion of high-affinity sites increased from 4% (membrane-bound) to 48% (reconstituted) of the total receptor population. These high-affinity sites were coupled to G proteins, as guanyl nucleotides completely abolished them. Addition of guanyl nucleotides prior to solubilization or to reconstitution, however, had no effect on the subsequent yield of the reconstituted receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

In Vivo Partial Inactivation of Dopamine D1 Receptors Induces Hypersensitivity of Cortical Dopamine-Sensitive Adenylate Cyclase: Permissive Role of α1-Adrenergic Receptors

As shown by autoradiography, peripheral injections of N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) induced a dose-dependent decrease of [3H]SCH 23390 and [3H]prazosin high-affinity binding sites in the rat prefrontal cortex. EEDQ showed similar efficacy in inactivating cortical and striatal dopamine (DA) D1 receptors, whereas prazosin-sensitive alpha 1-adrenergic receptors were more sensitive to the action of the alkylating agent, as for all doses of EEDQ tested (from 0.8 to 3 mg/kg, i.p.), the decrease in cortical [3H]SCH 23390 binding was less pronounced than that of [3H]prazosin. The effects of EEDQ on [3H]SCH 23390 binding and DA-sensitive adenylate cyclase activity were then simultaneously compared in individual rats. In the striatum, whatever the dose of EEDQ used, the decrease of DA-sensitive adenylate cyclase activity was always lower than that of D1 binding sites, suggesting the occurrence of a large proportion of spare D1 receptors. In the prefrontal cortex, a significant increase in DA-sensitive adenylate cyclase activity was observed in rats treated with a low dose of EEDQ (0.8 mg/kg), this effect being associated with a slight reduction in [3H]SCH 23390 binding sites (-20%). Parallel decreases in the enzyme activity and D1 binding sites were observed with higher doses. The EEDQ-induced supersensitivity of DA-sensitive adenylate cyclase did not occur in rats in which the decrease in [3H]prazosin binding sites was higher than 35%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Anterior pituitary dopamine receptors. Demonstration of interconvertible high and low affinity states of the D-2 dopamine receptor

The interactions of dopaminergic agonists and antagonists with binding sites in bovine anterior pituitary membranes have been investigated with radioligand-binding techniques and computer-modeling procedures. 3H-labeled agonist binding is stereospecific, reversible, saturable, and of high affinity. The rank order of catecholamines, phenothiazines, and related drugs in competing for 3H-agonist binding is indicative of interactions with a D-2 dopamine receptor. Both agonist/3H-agonist and antagonist/3H-agonist competition curves are monophasic and noncooperative (nH = 1) with computer analysis indicating a single class of binding sites. Specific 3H-agonist binding can be completely inhibited by guanine nucleotides. GppNHp us the most potent nucleotide followed by GTP and GDP which are equipotent. The equilibrium binding capacity for 3H-labeled antagonists is twice that for 3H-agonists. Unlabeled antagonists inhibit 3H-antagonist binding competitively and exhibit antagonist/3H-antagonist competition curves which model best to a state of homogeneous affinity. In contrast, unlabeled agonists inhibit 3H-antagonist binding in a heterogeneous fashion displaying multiphasic (nH less than 1) competition curves which can be resolved into high and low affinity binding sites. In the presence of saturating concentrations of guanine nucleotides, however, the agonist/3H-antagonist curves model best to a single affinity state which is identical with the low affinity state seen in control curves. The binding data can be explained by postulating two states of the D-2 dopamine receptor, inducible by agonists but not antagonists and modulated by guanine nucleotides.     

Striatal D-2 dopamine agonist binding sites fluctuate during the rat estrous cycle

Striatal D-2 dopamine (DA) antagonist and agonist binding sites were measured during the rat estrous cycle and compared to ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Dopaminergic D-2 antagonist binding sites were constant during the estrous cycle while agonist binding sites show a rapid and significant decrease of the ratio of high to low D-2 agonist binding sites from proestrus AM (PAM) to diestrus 1 (D1) and return to OVX value in diestrus 2 (DII). Thus, physiological fluctuations of hormones as occur during the estrous cycle can modulate extrahypothalamic biogenic amine activity, namely striatal DA systems which are not involved in the control of hormone secretion.     

Pharmacological effects of a specific dopamine D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 in comparison with neuroleptics

Neuroleptics such as thioxanthenes (cis($\text{Z}$)-flupentixol and cis($\text{Z}$)-clopenthixol) and phenothiazines (fluphenazine and perphenazine), which block both dopamine (DA) D-1 and D-2 receptors and the butyrophenones (haloperidol and spiroperidol), which block D-2 receptors only, are equipotent both behaviorally and clinically. A new compound SCH 23390 which selectively blocks DA D-1 receptors, resembles many neuroleptics in its pharmacological profile: antistereotypic effects in mice, rats and dogs, cataleptogenic effect and inhibitory effect on amphetamine circling. In contrast SCH 23390 has no effect on apomorphine-induced vomiting in dogs and little effects on 6-OHDA-denervated supersensitive DA receptors, stimulated by the DA agonist 3-PPP. In a series of experiments where methylphenidate-induced stereotyped gnawing in mice was inhibited by neuroleptics, it was shown that concomitant treatment with scopolamine or diazepam attenuated the effect of butyrophenones (D-2 antagonists). The same treatment attenuated the effect of phenothiazines, to a lesser extent, and hardly attenuated the effect of thioxanthenes and SCH 23390 at all. It is concluded that DA D-1 receptors are as important as D-2 receptors for the expression of neuroleptic activity in most animal models believed to be predictive of antipsychotic and extrapyramidal side-effect potential. However, the D-1 antagonist is less sensitive than D-2 antagonists to antimuscarinic compounds and benzodiapines.     

Dopamine D1 receptors with enhanced agonist affinity and reduced antagonist affinity revealed by chemical modification

In order to investigate the possibility that there may be two conformationally distinct dopamine D1 binding sites, the effect of lysine-modifying agents on striatal dopamine D1 receptors was investigated. Treatment with the distilbene derivative, 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonate, (DIDS), resulted in an irreversible D1 receptor inactivation that was associated with a 70% loss of binding sites. The remaining DIDS-insensitive sites displayed both a decreased affinity (approximately 5 fold) for the D1 antagonist SCH-23390 and an enhanced affinity of dopaminergic agonists (approximately 10 fold) for the agonist high-affinity form of the receptor. Pretreatment with Gpp(NH)p, a non-hydrolysable guanine nucleotide, prevented the formation of the agonist high-affinity form, indicating that these sites are G-protein-linked. Prior occupancy of D1 receptors with dopaminergic agonists and antagonists afforded no protection against DIDS inactivation, suggesting that a site outside the ligand binding subunit of the D1 receptor was modified. Taken together, these data suggest that [3H]SCH-23390 labels two conformationally distinct populations of dopamine D1 receptors.     

Influence of D-1 receptor system on the D-2 receptor-mediated hypothermic response in mice

The hypothermia induced by apomorphine, a mixed dopamine (DA) agonist in male Swiss-Webster mice, was not blocked by the selective D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 but was completely blocked by the selective D-2 antagonists haloperidol, sulpiride and YM-09151-2. The selective D-1 agonist SKF 38393 did not elicit hypothermic response but the selective D-2 agonist quinpirole caused a marked lowering of rectal temperature. D-2 antagonists blocked this response to quinpirole. SCH 23390 enhanced and SKF 38393 attenuated the hypothermia induced by quinpirole. Ineffective doses of haloperidol and SKF 38393, when given together, completely blocked the effect of quinpirole. It was concluded that hypothermia is a D-2 receptor mediated response but modulated by the D-1 receptor system. In another series of experiments the influence of neuroleptics and antidepressants on the hypothermic effect of apomorphine and quinpirole was investigated. The hypothermic effect of a low dose (1 mg/kg) of apomorphine was blocked by the D-2 receptor antagonists, but not by classical antidepressants. However, the response to a high dose (10 mg/kg) of apomorphine was blocked by both classical antidepressants and D-2 antagonists (except haloperidol). These drugs did not show similar effect on quinpirole-induced hypothermia. It is clear that the hypothermic response, especially that of quinpirole, is not a suitable model for testing either neuroleptics or antidepressants.     

Dopaminergic 3H-agonist receptors in rat brain. New evidence on localization and pharmacology

Recent methodological advances have allowed the reliable assay of specific dopaminergic 3H-agonist binding sites in rat striatum. Successful assay depends on preincubation of tissue homogenates at 37 degrees C; this results in a guanyl nucleotide-sensitive and dopamine (DA)-dependent increase in the density (Bmax) of 3H-agonist binding. Lesions of DA terminals or drugs which deplete DA levels prevent the preincubation-induced increase in binding, and this effect is completely reversible by preincubation with added DA. In contrast, kainic acid lesions irreversibly reduce 3H-agonist binding. It is concluded that the evidence supporting the existence of presynaptic "D-3" sites is artefactual and that 3H-DA binding sites are more likely related to post-synaptic receptors. 3H-DA binding involves two sites, one of which has pharmacologic properties similar to D-1 receptors, whereas the other resembles D-2 receptors. The affinity of 15 antipsychotic drugs for 3H-haloperidol binding sites was highly correlated (R = 0.94) with their inhibitory potency at a subset of 3H-DA binding sites. However, the inhibition of 3H-DA binding by antipsychotic drugs was noncompetitive. These findings can be explained by an allosteric model, whereby antagonists bind to a site different from but allosterically linked to a high-affinity 3H-DA binding site.     

Guanyl nucleotide and divalent cation regulation of cortical S2 serotonin receptors

Computer-assisted quantitative analysis of radioligand binding to rat cortical S2 serotonin receptors indicates the existence of two affinity states of the same receptor population. Monophasic antagonist competition curves for [3H]ketanserin-labelled sites suggest a uniform population of receptors with one affinity state for antagonists. Biphasic competition curves of agonists suggest that agonists discriminate high- and low-agonist-affinity forms of the S2 receptors. The affinities of agonists for the high- and low-affinity states, and the apparent percentages of high agonist-affinity forms varies with different agonists. The guanine nucleotides GTP and guanyl-5'-imido-diphosphate [Gpp(NH)p], as well as divalent cations, modulate the proportion of the sites with high affinity for agonists as evidenced by their ability to shift the agonist competition curves for [3H]ketanserin-labelled S2 receptors. GTP and Gpp(NH)p effects appear to be agonist-specific, as they do not affect antagonist competition for [3H]ketanserin-labelled S2 receptors, or [3H]ketanserin binding to S2 receptors. ATP and ADP have little or no effect on the binding properties of S2 serotonin receptors, whereas GDP is less potent than GTP. The presence of these specific nucleotide effects are the first evidence suggesting involvement of a guanine nucleotide-binding protein in the mechanism of agonist interaction with the S2 serotonin receptor. In general, the binding properties of [3H]ketanserin-labelled S2 serotonin receptors strongly resemble those of adenylate-cyclase coupled receptors such as the beta-adrenergic, the alpha 2-receptor, and the D-2 dopamine receptor. This may indicate the S2 serotonin receptor is coupled to adenylate cyclase activity, through a GTP binding protein.     

Preferential adsorption of dopamine antagonist binding sites by fluphenazine-agarose

Separation of dopamine (DA) agonist and antagonist receptors was attempted by means of a covalently-bound fluphenazine-agarose (Flu-agarose). Incubation of striatal membranes with Flu-agarose resulted in loss of 3H-spiroperidol (3H-SPI) binding sites, while incubation with non-coupled agarose did not cause any change. The loss of 3H-SPI binding to the Flu-agarose treated membranes was not attributed to the release of fluphenazine from Flu-agarose as justified by several criteria. Flu-agarose adsorbed more effectively striatal membranes with 3H-SPI binding sites than those with 3H-DA binding sites. Following incubation of the membranes with Flu-agarose (2.5 ml beads/100 mg membrane protein), the density of 3H-SPI binding sites in the resulting membranes was reduced to 29%, whereas the density of 3H-DA binding sites to the same membranes was not changed. In addition, the potencies of DA antagonists to inhibit 3H-N-propylnorapomorphine binding to the membranes were decreased more than a hundred times, while the potencies of DA agonists were little affected. These results suggest that in the striatal membranes exist at least two populations of DA receptors.