Mechanisms of Ras membrane organization and signaling: Ras on a rocker

Understanding the signalling function of Ras GTPases has been the focus of much research for over 20 years. Both the catalytic domain and the membrane anchoring C terminal hypervariable region (HVR) of Ras are necessary for its cellular function. However, while the highly conserved catalytic domain has been characterized in atomic detail, the structure of the full-length membrane-bound Ras has remained elusive. Lack of structural knowledge on the full-length protein limited our understanding of Ras signalling. For example, structures of the Ras catalytic domain solved in complex with effectors do not provide a basis for the functional specificity of different Ras isoforms. Recent molecular dynamics simulations in combination with biophysical and cell biological experiments have shown that the HVR and parts of the G domain cofunction with the lipid tails to anchor H-ras to the plasma membrane. In the GTP-bound state, H-ras adopts an orientation that allows read out by Ras effectors and translation into corresponding MAPK signalling. Here we discuss details of an analysis that suggests a novel balance model for Ras functioning. The balance model rationalizes Ras membrane orientation and may help explain isoform specific interactions of Ras with its effectors and modulators.     

Ras trafficking, localization and compartmentalized signalling

Ras proteins are proto-oncogenes that are frequently mutated in human cancers. Three closely related isoforms, HRAS, KRAS and NRAS, are expressed in all cells and have overlapping but distinctive functions. Recent work has revealed how differences between the Ras isoforms in their trafficking, localization and protein-membrane orientation enable signalling specificity to be determined. We review the various strategies used to characterize compartmentalized Ras localization and signalling. Localization is an important contextual modifier of signalling networks and insights from the Ras system are of widespread relevance for researchers interested in signalling initiated from membranes.     

Mechanisms of Membrane Binding of Small GTPase K-Ras4B Farnesylated Hypervariable Region

K-Ras4B belongs to a family of small GTPases that regulates cell growth, differentiation and survival. K-ras is frequently mutated in cancer. K-Ras4B association with the plasma membrane through its farnesylated and positively charged C-terminal hypervariable region (HVR) is critical to its oncogenic function. However, the structural mechanisms of membrane association are not fully understood. Here, using confocal microscopy, surface plasmon resonance, and molecular dynamics simulations, we observed that K-Ras4B can be distributed in rigid and loosely packed membrane domains. Its membrane binding domain interaction with phospholipids is driven by membrane fluidity. The farnesyl group spontaneously inserts into the disordered lipid microdomains, whereas the rigid microdomains restrict the farnesyl group penetration. We speculate that the resulting farnesyl protrusion toward the cell interior allows oligomerization of the K-Ras4B membrane binding domain in rigid microdomains. Unlike other Ras isoforms, K-Ras4B HVR contains a single farnesyl modification and positively charged polylysine sequence. The high positive charge not only modulates specific HVR binding to anionic phospholipids but farnesyl membrane orientation. Phosphorylation of Ser-181 prohibits spontaneous farnesyl membrane insertion. The mechanism illuminates the roles of HVR modifications in K-Ras4B targeting microdomains of the plasma membrane and suggests an additional function for HVR in regulation of Ras signaling.     

Mapping Cellular Routes of Ras: A Ubiquitin Trail

The three mammalian Ras isoforms: HRas, NRas and KRas have been widely implicated in the control of cell proliferation, survival, motility and transformation. Although nearly identical with respect to their catalytic and effector-binding properties, HRas, NRas and KRas lead to different biological outcomes in development, cell growth and cancer. This functional distinction is believed to result at least in part from the differential membrane compartmentalization of Ras isoforms. The different distribution of Ras proteins in cellular membranes dictates unique spatio-temporal patterns of activation of effector pathways. This perspective focuses on the factors that control membrane compartmentalization of Ras with an emphasis on a recently discovered novel posttranslational modification of Ras—ubiquitination. The properties of Ras ubiquitination, its contribution to the regulation of Ras intracellular trafficking and finally the influence of Ras ubiquitination on its signaling potential are discussed.     

Millisecond molecular dynamics simulations of KRas-dimer formation and interfaces

Ras dimers have been proposed as building blocks for initiating the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cellular signaling pathway. To better examine the structure of possible dimer interfaces, the dynamics of Ras dimerization, and its potential signaling consequences, we performed molecular dynamics simulations totaling 1 ms of sampling, using an all-atom model of two full-length, farnesylated, guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-bound, wild-type KRas4b proteins diffusing on 29%POPS (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-L-serine)-mixed POPC (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) membranes. Our simulations unveil an ensemble of thermodynamically weak KRas dimers spanning multiple conformations. The most stable conformations, having the largest interface areas, involve helix α₂ and a hypervariable region (HVR). Among the dimer conformations, we found that the HVR of each KRas has frequent interactions with various parts of the dimer, thus potentially mediating the dimerization. Some dimer configurations have one KRas G-domain elevated above the lipid bilayer surface by residing on top of the other G-domain, thus likely contributing to the recruitment of cytosolic Raf kinases in the context of a stably formed multi-protein complex. We identified a variant of the α₄-α₅ KRas-dimer interface that is similar to the interfaces obtained with fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) data of HRas on lipid bilayers. Interestingly, we found two arginine fingers, R68 and R149, that directly interact with the beta-phosphate of the GTP bound in KRas, in a manner similar to what is observed in a crystal structure of GAP-HRas complex, which can facilitate the GTP hydrolysis via the arginine finger of GTPase-activating protein (GAP).     

Maize ROP7 GTPase contains a unique, CaaX box-independent plasma membrane targeting signal

Signals in the carboxy-terminal hypervariable region (HVR) of Rho and Ras GTPases target these proteins to specific membrane compartments, where they function in signal transduction. ROP6 and ROP7 are closely related maize Rops (a plant-specific Rho subgroup) that share HVR sequences divergent from other Rho HVRs. Both ROPs terminate in CAA, instead of the consensus C-terminal CaaX motif required for membrane association of all characterized Ras and Rho GTPases. The ROP6/7 HVR contains two additional cysteines, potential sites for post-translational modification that leads to membrane association; one is in an internal CaaX motif, which would be at the C-terminus if the final intron in both genes were not removed. Transient expression of a GFP-ROP7 fusion revealed its near-total association with the plasma membrane (PM). Furthermore, the ROP7 HVR is sufficient to target GFP to the PM. Surprisingly, the cysteine in the terminal CAA is not required for PM targeting of GFP-ROP7. In contrast, an internal HVR cysteine is essential for proper targeting of the fusion, and the cysteine in the internal CaaX is required for complete membrane association. Interestingly, this CaaX motif can also direct PM association when placed at the fusion C-terminus by addition of an internal stop codon. Fractionation experiments confirm that maize ROPs associate with membranes in maize seedlings. Our analysis suggests that the ROP7 HVR directs PM localization by a mechanism independent of a C-terminal CaaX motif; this mechanism may have evolved through addition of 3' intron/exon sequences to a rop progenitor.     

Interactions of Ras proteins with the plasma membrane and their roles in signaling

The complex dynamic structure of the plasma membrane plays critical roles in cellular signaling; interactions with the membrane lipid milieu, spatial segregation within and between cellular membranes and/or targeting to specific membrane-associated scaffolds are intimately involved in many signal transduction pathways. In this review, we focus on the membrane interactions of Ras proteins. These small GTPases play central roles in the regulation of cell growth and proliferation, and their excessive activation is commonly encountered in human tumors. Ras proteins associate with the membrane continuously via C-terminal lipidation and additional interactions in both their inactive and active forms; this association, as well as the targeting of specific Ras isoforms to plasma membrane microdomains and to intracellular organelles, have recently been implicated in Ras signaling and oncogenic potential. We discuss biochemical and biophysical evidence for the roles of specific domains of Ras proteins in mediating their association with the plasma membrane, and consider the potential effects of lateral segregation and interactions with membrane-associated protein assemblies on the signaling outcomes.     

Ras acylation,compartmentalization and signaling nanoclusters (Review)

Ras proteins have become paradigms for isoform- and compartment-specific signaling. Recent work has shown that Ras isoforms are differentially distributed within cell surface signaling nanoclusters and on endomembranous compartments. The critical feature regulating Ras protein localization and isoform-specific functions is the C-terminal hypervariable region (HVR). In this review we discuss the differential post-translational modifications and reversible targeting functions of Ras isoform HVR motifs. We describe how compartmentalized Ras signaling has specific functional consequences and how cell surface signaling nanoclusters generate precise signaling outputs.     

Ras signaling from plasma membrane and endomembrane microdomains

Ras proteins are compartmentalized by dynamic interactions with both plasma membrane microdomains and intracellular membranes. The mechanisms underlying Ras compartmentalization involve a series of protein/lipid, lipid/lipid and cytoskeleton interactions, resulting in the generation of discrete microdomains from which Ras operates. Segregation of Ras proteins to these different platforms regulates the formation of Ras signaling complexes and the generation of discrete signal outputs. This temporal and spatial modulation of Ras signal transduction provides a mechanism for the generation of different biological outcomes from different Ras isoforms, as well as flexibility in the signal output from a single activated isoform.     

Aggregation of Lipid-Anchored Full-Length H-Ras in Lipid Bilayers: Simulations with the MARTINI Force Field

Lipid-anchored Ras oncoproteins assemble into transient, nano-sized substructures on the plasma membrane. These substructures, called nanoclusters, were proposed to be crucial for high-fidelity signal transmission in cells. However, the molecular basis of Ras nanoclustering is poorly understood. In this work, we used coarse-grained (CG) molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the molecular mechanism by which full-length H-ras proteins form nanoclusters in a model membrane. We chose two different conformations of H-ras that were proposed to represent the active and inactive state of the protein, and a domain-forming model bilayer made up of di16:0-PC (DPPC), di18:2-PC (DLiPC) and cholesterol. We found that, irrespective of the initial conformation, Ras molecules assembled into a single large aggregate. However, the two binding modes, which are characterized by the different orientation of the G-domain with respect to the membrane, differ in dynamics and organization during and after aggregation. Some of these differences involve regions of Ras that are important for effector/modulator binding, which may partly explain observed differences in the ability of active and inactive H-ras nanoclusters to recruit effectors. The simulations also revealed some limitations in the CG force field to study protein assembly in solution, which we discuss in the context of proposed potential avenues of improvement.     

High-Affinity Interaction of the K-Ras4B Hypervariable Region with the Ras Active Site

Ras proteins are small GTPases that act as signal transducers between cell surface receptors and several intracellular signaling cascades. They contain highly homologous catalytic domains and flexible C-terminal hypervariable regions (HVRs) that differ across Ras isoforms. KRAS is among the most frequently mutated oncogenes in human tumors. Surprisingly, we found that the C-terminal HVR of K-Ras4B, thought to minimally impact the catalytic domain, directly interacts with the active site of the protein. The interaction is almost 100-fold tighter with the GDP-bound than the GTP-bound protein. HVR binding interferes with Ras-Raf interaction, modulates binding to phospholipids, and slightly slows down nucleotide exchange. The data indicate that contrary to previously suggested models of K-Ras4B signaling, HVR plays essential roles in regulation of signaling. High affinity binding of short peptide analogs of HVR to K-Ras active site suggests that targeting this surface with inhibitory synthetic molecules for the therapy of KRAS-dependent tumors is feasible.     

Activated K-Ras and H-Ras display different interactions with saturable nonraft sites at the surface of live cells

Ras-membrane interactions play important roles in signaling and oncogenesis. H-Ras and K-Ras have nonidentical membrane anchoring moieties that can direct them to different membrane compartments. Ras-lipid raft interactions were reported, but recent studies suggest that activated K-Ras and H-Ras are not raft resident. However, specific interactions of activated Ras proteins with nonraft sites, which may underlie functional differences and phenotypic variation between different Ras isoforms, are unexplored. Here we used lateral mobility studies by FRAP to investigate the membrane interactions of green fluorescent protein-tagged H- and K-Ras in live cells. All Ras isoforms displayed stable membrane association, moving by lateral diffusion and not by exchange with a cytoplasmic pool. The lateral diffusion rates of constitutively active K- and H-Ras increased with their expression levels in a saturable manner, suggesting dynamic association with saturable sites or domains. These sites are distinct from lipid rafts, as the activated Ras mutants are not raft resident. Moreover, they appear to be different for H- and K-Ras. However, wild-type H-Ras, the only isoform preferentially localized in rafts, displayed cholesterol-sensitive interactions with rafts that were independent of its expression level. Our findings provide a mechanism for selective signaling by different Ras isoforms.     

Unravelling the mechanism of dual‐specificity GAPs

The molecular mechanism by which dual‐specificity RasGAPs of the Gap1 subfamily activate the GTP hydrolysis of both Rap and Ras is an unresolved phenomenon. RasGAPs and RapGAPs use different strategies to stimulate the GTPase reaction of their cognate G‐proteins. RasGAPs contribute an arginine finger to orient through the Gln61 of Ras the nucleophilic water molecule. RapGAP contributes an asparagine (Asn thumb) into the active site to substitute for the missing Gln61. Here, by using steady‐state kinetic assays and time‐resolved Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) experiments with wild type and mutant proteins, we unravel the remarkable mechanism for the specificity switch. The plasticity of GAP1^IP4BP and RASAL is mediated by the extra GTPase‐activating protein (GAP) domains, which promote a different orientation of Ras and Rap's switch‐II and catalytic residues in the active site. Thereby, Gln63 in Rap adopts the catalytic role normally taken by Gln61 of Ras. This re‐orientation requires specific interactions between switch‐II of Rap and helix‐α6 of GAPs. This supports the notion that the specificities of fl proteins versus GAP domains are potentially different.     

Diversity in protein associations of the spectrin-based membrane skeleton of nonerythroid cells

Summary The purpose of this review is to summarize recent progress in understanding interactions of spectrin with membranes from brain and other tissues. Spectrin has at least two choices in linkages with the membrane, one through ankyrin, which in turn is associated with integral membrane proteins, and another linkage directly with integral membrane sites identified recently in brain membranes. Some of the integral membrane protein sites in brain bind preferentially with one spectrin isoform, while some can interact with both erythroid and the general isoform of spectrin. Ankyrin also has different isoforms, and these exhibit specificity in binding to spectrin isoforms and associate with distinct integral membrane proteins. The membrane binding sites for ankyrin include several integral membrane proteins, which are differentially expressed in different cells: the anion exchanger of intercalated cells of mammalian kidney, the sodium/potassium ATPase of kidney, and the voltage-dependent sodium channel of neurons. Ankyrin is present in many other cell types and it is likely that additional ankyrin-binding proteins will be identified. Each of the proteins that now are candidates for ankyrin binding proteins are ion channels or transporters and are localized in specialized cellular domains. The polarized localization of the ankyrin-associated membrane proteins is an essential aspect of their function at a physiological level. Spectrin and ankyrin thus exhibit an unsuspected diversity in protein linkages and have the potential for cell domain-specific interactions with a variety of membrane proteins.     

Organization of Farnesylated,Carboxymethylated KRAS4B on Membranes

Mutations of the Ras proteins HRAS, KRAS4A, KRAS4B, and NRAS are associated with a high percentage of all human cancers. The proteins are composed of highly homologous N-terminal catalytic or globular domains, plus C-terminal hypervariable regions (HVRs). Post-translational modifications of all RAS HVRs helps target RAS proteins to cellular membrane locations where they perform their signaling functions. For the predominant KRAS4 isoform, KRAS4B, post-translational farnesylation and carboxymethylation, along with a patch of HVR basic residues help foster membrane binding. Recent investigations implicate membrane-bound RAS dimers, oligomers, and nanoclusters as landing pads for effector proteins that relay RAS signals. The details of these RAS signaling platforms have not been elucidated completely, in part due to the difficulties in preparing modified proteins. We have employed properly farnesylated and carboxymethylated KRAS4B in lipid monolayer incubations to examine how the proteins assemble on membranes. Our results reveal novel insights into to how KRAS4B may organize on membranes.     

The GDI-like solubilizing factor PDEδ sustains the spatial organization and signalling of Ras family proteins

We identify a role for the GDI-like solubilizing factor (GSF) PDEδ in modulating signalling through Ras family G proteins by sustaining their dynamic distribution in cellular membranes. We show that the GDI-like pocket of PDEδ binds and solubilizes farnesylated Ras proteins, thereby enhancing their diffusion in the cytoplasm. This mechanism allows more effective trapping of depalmitoylated Ras proteins at the Golgi and polycationic Ras proteins at the plasma membrane to counter the entropic tendency to distribute these proteins over all intracellular membranes. Thus, PDEδ activity augments K/Hras signalling by enriching Ras at the plasma membrane; conversely, PDEδ down-modulation randomizes Ras distributions to all membranes in the cell and suppresses regulated signalling through wild-type Ras and also constitutive oncogenic Ras signalling in cancer cells. Our findings link the activity of PDEδ in determining Ras protein topography to Ras-dependent signalling.     

The Plasma Membrane as a Competitive Inhibitor and Positive Allosteric Modulator of KRas4B Signaling

Mutant Ras proteins are important drivers of human cancers, yet no approved drugs act directly on this difficult target. Over the last decade, the idea has emerged that oncogenic signaling can be diminished by molecules that drive Ras into orientations in which effector-binding interfaces are occluded by the cell membrane. To support this approach to drug discovery, we characterize the orientational preferences of membrane-bound K-Ras4B in 1.45-ms aggregate time of atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. Individual simulations probe active or inactive states of Ras on membranes with or without anionic lipids. We find that the membrane orientation of Ras is relatively insensitive to its bound guanine nucleotide and activation state but depends strongly on interactions with anionic phosphatidylserine lipids. These lipids slow Ras’ translational and orientational diffusion and promote a discrete population in which small changes in orientation control Ras’ competence to bind multiple regulator and effector proteins. Our results suggest that compound-directed conversion of constitutively active mutant Ras into functionally inactive forms may be accessible via subtle perturbations of Ras’ orientational preferences at the membrane surface.     

The C-terminal nsP1a protein of human astrovirus is a phosphoprotein that interacts with the viral polymerase

Human astrovirus nonstructural C-terminal nsP1a protein (nsP1a/4) colocalizes with the endoplasmic reticulum and viral RNA. It has been suggested that nsP1a/4 protein is involved in the RNA replication process in endoplasmic reticulum-derived intracellular membranes. A hypervariable region (HVR) is contained in the nsP1a/4 protein, and different replicative patterns can be distinguished depending on its variability. In the present work, both the astrovirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and four types (IV, V, VI, and XII) of nsP1a/4 proteins have been cloned and expressed in the baculovirus system to analyze their interactions. Different isoforms of each of the nsP1a/4 proteins exist: a nonphosphorylated isoform and different phosphorylated isoforms. While the polymerase accumulates as a monomer, the nsP1a/4 proteins accumulate as oligomers. The oligomerization domain of nsP1a/4-V is mapped between residues 176 and 209. For all studied genotypes, oligomers mainly contain the nonphosphorylated isoform. When RNA polymerase is coexpressed with nsP1a/4 proteins, they interact, likely forming heterodimers. The polymerase binding region has been mapped in the nsP1a/4-V protein between residues 88 and 176. Phosphorylated isoforms of nsP1a/4 type VI show a stronger interactive pattern with the polymerase than the nonphosphorylated isoform. This difference is not observed in genotypes IV and V, suggesting a role of the HVR in modulating the interaction of the nsP1a/4 protein with the polymerase through phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of some critical residues.     

H-Ras dynamically interacts with recycling endosomes in CHO-K1 cells: involvement of Rab5 and Rab11 in the trafficking of H-Ras to this pericentriolar endocytic compartment

H-, N-, and K-Ras are isoforms of Ras proteins, which undergo different lipid modifications at the C terminus. These post-translational events make possible the association of Ras proteins both with the inner plasma membrane and to the cytosolic surface of endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex, which is also required for the proper function of these proteins. To better characterize the intracellular distribution and sorting of Ras proteins, constructs were engineered to express the C-terminal domain of H- and K-Ras fused to variants of green fluorescent protein. Using confocal microscopy, we found in CHO-K1 cells that H-Ras, which is palmitoylated and farnesylated, localized at the recycling endosome in addition to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. In contrast, K-Ras, which is farnesylated and nonpalmitoylated, mainly localized at the plasma membrane. Moreover, we demonstrate that sorting signals of H- and K-Ras are contained within the C-terminal domain of these proteins and that palmitoylation on this region of H-Ras might operate as a dominant sorting signal for proper subcellular localization of this protein in CHO-K1 cells. Using selective photobleaching techniques, we demonstrate the dynamic nature of H-Ras trafficking to the recycling endosome from plasma membrane. We also provide evidence that Rab5 and Rab11 activities are required for proper delivery of H-Ras to the endocytic recycling compartment. Using a chimera containing the Ras binding domain of c-Raf-1 fused to a fluorescent protein, we found that a pool of GTP-bound H-Ras localized on membranes from Rab11-positive recycling endosome after serum stimulation. These results suggest that H-Ras present in membranes of the recycling endosome might be activating signal cascades essential for the dynamic and function of the organelle.